Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
3.2
1.7
Journals
Social Sciences
Special Issues
Sport, Gender and Stereotypes
share announcement

Sport, Gender and Stereotypes

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Gender Studies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 September 2024 | Viewed by 2608

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Lindsay Parks Pieper

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sport Management Department, University of Lynchburg, Lynchburg, VA 24501-3113, USA
Interests: sport management; gender
Dr. Jörg Krieger

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Public Health-Sport Science, Aarhus Universitet, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Interests: sport science
Dr. April Henning

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
Interests: women and sport
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We invite submissions for a special issue on "Sport, Gender and Stereotypes" to Social Sciences. Stereotypes, deeply rooted in social norms and beliefs, often shape our perceptions and expectations regarding gender roles and behaviors in sports. This special issue aims to explore the gendered contexts of sport and how these have become entangled in the reproduction of or challenges to gender stereotypes. We are interested in contributions that investigate how social assumptions about masculinity and femininity impact the development, practice, and sporting experiences at various levels. We encourage contributions that analyze historical trends, events, business, and coaching practices, as well as sociological aspects related to participation and performance in sports. 

The special issue welcomes interdisciplinary research that examines the complex interplay between gender, sport, and the broader social constructs within which they are embedded. We particularly encourage submissions that offer a strong historical perspective, but we also welcome contributions from contemporary perspectives, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of gender, stereotypes, and sport. 

Potential topics for submission include, but are not limited to: 

  • Historical analyses of gendered trends and practices in sports.
  • Examinations of gendered stereotypes and their impacts on sporting events and athletes.
  • Gender disparities in sports participation and access to resources.
  • The influence of social constructs on coaching, organizational structures, and decision-making processes in sports.
  • Socio-cultural factors affecting the performance and achievements of male and female athletes.
  • Explorations of the intersectionality of gender with other social categories (e.g., race, ethnicity, sexuality, disability) and its influence on the construction of sporting identities or sporting experiences.
  • Analyses of media representations and their role in reinforcing or challenging gender stereotypes in sports.

Dr. Lindsay Parks Pieper
Dr. Jörg Krieger
Dr. April Henning
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sport
  • gender
  • history
  • intersectionality
  • social constructivism

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1397 KiB  
Article
‘For Those Who Like the Life Nothing Could Be Better’: The Games Mistress in 1920s Britain
by Dave Day
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040212 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 317
Abstract
During the Edwardian period, women’s physical education colleges were graduating significant numbers of gymnastics and games teachers, the demand for whom had increased rapidly following an expansion in the playing of team sports in girls’ schools. Much of the subsequent development of women’s [...] Read more.
During the Edwardian period, women’s physical education colleges were graduating significant numbers of gymnastics and games teachers, the demand for whom had increased rapidly following an expansion in the playing of team sports in girls’ schools. Much of the subsequent development of women’s physical activity in the 1920s can be credited to the passion and commitment of these women, who were not only key role models within the school setting but who also coached and organised women’s sport at club, regional, and national level. Given that the education sector operated a ‘marriage bar’ until 1944, the critical juncture in their careers was the decision to marry or not, and several of these women decided to remain single. This, and the strong bonds they often formed with other practitioners, has resulted in a great deal of unsubstantiated speculation about their private lives. Combining evidence from a variety of primary sources, including newspapers, census returns, college records, literature, girls’ annuals, specialist periodicals, photographs, and local and family histories, this paper illuminates some of the biographies and experiences of these women and questions the stereotypical image of the games mistress as an unfulfilled spinster. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport, Gender and Stereotypes)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 348 KiB  
Article
Why Do We Run in a Sporting Event? A Gender Perspective through the Half-Marathon of Cordoba, Spain
by Jose E. Ramos-Ruiz, Miguel A. Solano-Sanchez, Lucia Castaño-Prieto and Lucia Garcia-Garcia
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040209 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 375
Abstract
The study of participants’ motivations in sporting events is a recurring topic that provides valuable information for stakeholders interested in the event’s success. This motivation structure varies between geographies and evolves, so addressing new case studies from fresh perspectives updates and enriches the [...] Read more.
The study of participants’ motivations in sporting events is a recurring topic that provides valuable information for stakeholders interested in the event’s success. This motivation structure varies between geographies and evolves, so addressing new case studies from fresh perspectives updates and enriches the knowledge on the subject. Through a survey of 416 participants in the Córdoba Half-Marathon, Spain, we aim to explore the existence of new dimensions of motivation to participate in running events, as well as to analyse if there are statistically significant differences between men and women in their participation motivations and the magnitude of these differences. To this end, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) has been conducted, and the Mann–Whitney U and Hedges’ G statistics have been utilised. The results of this research complement previous studies with two new dimensions of motivation: inclusivity at various levels and the posting of images on social networks. Additionally, the leading role of female participants is evident, as they are more motivated than men to compete and surpass themselves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport, Gender and Stereotypes)
15 pages, 325 KiB  
Article
Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals’ Experiences of Advocacy
by Alex Mollin, Justine Allen and April Henning
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(11), 617; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110617 - 04 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1449
Abstract
The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how [...] Read more.
The underrepresentation of women in sport coaching continues to be recognised by researchers and some international organisations. Golf too suffers from a dramatic underrepresentation of women coaches. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women golf coaches and how they navigate this male-dominated coaching domain with a particular focus on experiences of advocacy. The research was designed to qualitatively capture women PGA Professionals’ lived experiences. Women PGA Professionals (N = 11) with 10–34 years of experience (M = 19.8) participated in semi-structured interviews that were structured on the four Ecological Systems Theory (EST) layers. Data were thematically analysed using the EST layers for initial categorization. From this, four themes were developed: recruitment and opportunity; on the course and in the pro shop; perceptions of women PGA Professionals; and advocacy and allies. The themes were part of two related processes: legitimisation and delegitimisation. These dual processes work to either validate women coaches—both as individuals and as a collective—or to undermine them within the profession, respectively, and operate over the four EST layers. Further, these processes are not always discreet and the two may overlap in unanticipated ways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport, Gender and Stereotypes)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop