At Risk Youth: A Focus on Technology-Assisted Adolescent Dating Violence

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (23 September 2023) | Viewed by 2358

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Criminology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
Interests: adolescent dating violence; technology-assisted adolescent dating violence; domestic violence; gender-based violence; technology-facilitated gender-based violence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There is a recognised body of literature that has well established the nature and extent of domestic violence among adults. This literature has been accompanied, and very much welcomed, by an increasing number of studies focusing on what is often termed dating violence or intimate partner violence, among adolescent populations. This has further been developed in recent years by research exploring the role and use of digital technologies in the perpetration and victimisation of dating abuse among adolescents (and adults too), despite those under the age of 16 still not being recognised in the UK government definition of domestic violence. In fact, the role of digital technology in dating violence has been subject to increased academic and practitioner concern. While developments in digital and communication technologies have brought many benefits in all aspects of life, it has also brought with it risks. Digital technologies are widely used by adolescents as a method to communicate, develop and maintain relationships with both friends and romantic partners. In terms of Technology-Assisted Adolescent Dating Violence and Abuse (TAADVA), adolescents are particularly vulnerable due to their relative immaturity, a lack of experience of romantic relationships, and their level of digital literacy in terms of awareness of privacy and being safe online. As such, they may also have more tolerant attitudes towards TAADVA and the acceptability of such behaviours may be normalised.  Importantly, TAADVA is recognised as a new method in which partners can abuse, monitor and control a victim. For some victims, technology is used as an additional tool of abuse for their partners, while for others, technology may create new opportunities for abuse that might not have occurred offline. Research on TAADVA is still in its relative  infancy; therefore, further research is welcomed that examines this issue in terms of its measurement, typologies of violence, risk factors, and the impact of such forms of abuse, along with the exploration of how behaviour online may be viewed as different to that offline (i.e., blurred boundaries, less regulation, online disinhibition), as such issues could be influential for adolescents at a time when they are learning and exploring relationships and digital technologies more independently. This Special Issue, therefore, will compose a selection of original articles from leading authors in the field with the aim of bringing together the latest knowledge and recommendations for addressing TAADVA and taking research on this issue a step further.

Dr. Karlie E. Stonard
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • adolescent(ce)
  • youth
  • dating violence
  • technology-assisted dating violence
  • cyber harassment
  • gender-based violence
  • psychological abuse
  • coercive control
  • sexual abuse

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1476 KiB  
Article
Fear and Distress: How Can We Measure the Impact of Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships?
by Cynthia Brown and Kelsey Hegarty
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(1), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010071 - 22 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2032
Abstract
Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships (TAR) is a relatively new form of intimate partner violence. Research exploring the impact of TAR on young people is limited, and while robust measures of TAR itself are emerging, measures of TAR impact lack evidence of validity. A [...] Read more.
Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships (TAR) is a relatively new form of intimate partner violence. Research exploring the impact of TAR on young people is limited, and while robust measures of TAR itself are emerging, measures of TAR impact lack evidence of validity. A mixed-methods approach was used to establish preliminary face and content validity for the measurement of TAR impact. Youth discussion groups (n = 38) revealed that (1) distress is favored over upset as a preferred measure of TAR impact, and (2) fear is an appropriate impact measure for some TAR behaviors. In an online survey, frontline practitioners (n = 171) perceived and subsequently rated a total of 54 TAR behaviors in the upper half of the severity range on fear and distress, with 6 behaviors ranking among each of the top 10 most fear- and distress-inducing behaviors. These findings provide evidence of both face and content validity for the use of fear and distress measures when seeking to understand the impact of TAR. Scholars, practitioners, and educators alike can use this evidence to enhance the validity of investigations into TAR and its impact, to support victims of TAR, and to improve TAR education among youth. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop