International Counter-Trafficking: A Zero-Sum Game?

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "International Migration".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2024) | Viewed by 2623

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: trafficking and counter-trafficking; migration; sex work; qualitative research

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

“Human trafficking” is widely considered to be a fundamentally global issue, with counter-trafficking efforts having consolidated in many countries over the past two decades. Despite a large amount of public attention and widespread condemnation of the exploitation of individuals who move within and between nation-state boundaries, the mobilization of the idea of trafficking remains inherently problematic. One reason is that the motivations that have animated activists, non-governmental organizations and states to mobilize against trafficking differ, with some parties having sought the abolition of prostitution or attempted to exert more control over international mobility. Other considerations relate to the power gained and the business opportunities opened up for “legal” actors within counter-trafficking apparatuses, bringing few benefits to victims who often face abuses and violence within counter-trafficking. This situation, in different contexts, results in counter-trafficking efforts appearing to have become a zero-sum game, in which gains made by those who populate counter-trafficking apparatuses rarely trickle down to the “victims of trafficking”. This Special Issue aims to present evidence and debate on counter-trafficking apparatuses, reflecting on the different obstacles that create and maintain this controversial situation, undermining the basic rights of “victims” and many other people on the move who fall outside this category. It welcomes submissions from scholars, scholar-activists, and collaborations with other counter-trafficking actors to contribute empirical research on counter-trafficking and informing debates that can help make counter-trafficking something more than a controversial zero-sum game. We welcome papers that engage with critical trafficking, migration and border studies, especially in relation the following issues: The challenges faced by labour and migration rights activists and organizations, as well as sex workers and pro-sex work activists and organizations, in gaining access to and influencing counter-trafficking debates; Counter-trafficking organizations, their idea of trafficking, and relations with target groups/beneficiaries, states and other counter-trafficking actors; Current debate and conceptual issues around “vulnerability”, “coercion” and “exploitation”; The impact of recent political and social developments—from the development of the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migrants to the COVID-19 pandemic and the conflict in Ukraine—on the idea of “trafficking” and related counter-trafficking interventions.

Dr. Mara Clemente
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 278 KiB  
Article
Protecting Protection Programmes or Engaging with People? Conditional Inclusion and Evolving Relational Dynamics in Anti-Trafficking Programmes
by Michela Semprebon
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040218 - 18 Apr 2024
Viewed by 319
Abstract
Anti-trafficking programmes in Italy have been implemented for more than two decades. Yet, little empirical evidence is available regarding their functioning. This paper draws on 56 semi-structured interviews carried out in the period of 2019–2021 with practitioners and beneficiaries of the N.A.Ve anti-trafficking [...] Read more.
Anti-trafficking programmes in Italy have been implemented for more than two decades. Yet, little empirical evidence is available regarding their functioning. This paper draws on 56 semi-structured interviews carried out in the period of 2019–2021 with practitioners and beneficiaries of the N.A.Ve anti-trafficking programme. The interviews focused on practitioners’ experience working with Nigerian women and on Nigerian women’s experiences of the programme upon completion. By building on critical anti-trafficking studies and the autonomy of migration perspective, this contribution looks at the relationship between practitioners and Nigerian women admitted to the programme by addressing the following questions: what is the experience of practitioners and beneficiaries in the N.A.Ve programme? To what extent is the structural violence of the counter-trafficking apparatus reproduced in the relational dynamics between practitioners, particularly Case Managers, and beneficiaries? How do beneficiaries cope with such violence? I argue that the Case Managers’ approach builds on “stratified layers of institutional knowledge” and that this concept is useful to highlight how their knowledge derives both from the counter-trafficking apparatus and their social work background. Furthermore, I present evidence that such an approach reproduces structural violence through processes of “conditional inclusion”. Nigerian women denounced this violence but also seized the relational capital grown from rapport, calling for more engagement with people rather than programme objectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue International Counter-Trafficking: A Zero-Sum Game?)
14 pages, 306 KiB  
Article
Nigerian Migrant Women and Human Trafficking Narratives: Stereotypes, Stigma and Ethnographic Knowledge
by Estefanía Acién González
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040207 - 11 Apr 2024
Viewed by 449
Abstract
During the last decades, Nigerian migrant women in the European sex market, described as victims of trafficking, have generated consistent concern and outrage. This article analyzes data from an ethnographic study of more than 800 Nigerian sex workers in southern Spain, describing the [...] Read more.
During the last decades, Nigerian migrant women in the European sex market, described as victims of trafficking, have generated consistent concern and outrage. This article analyzes data from an ethnographic study of more than 800 Nigerian sex workers in southern Spain, describing the networks used by these women to carry out their migration projects and the relationships they establish with their agents. Thus, it contributes to refuting the hegemonic narrative about trafficking and its victims by contrasting it with data collected and systematized over almost a decade of participant observation and informal conversation. This paper argues that the stereotypical image of the Nigerian migrant women as victims of abuse and violence by transnational trafficking networks functions to justify strict migration-control policies and the denial of labor rights to sex workers. As an antidote to the dominance of narratives based on stereotypes and pseudoscientific claims, this paper underscores the urgent need for ethnographic research and its focus on emic (participant) perspectives. The goal is to develop tailored and effective policies and practices for the prevention of and intervention in migrant women’s experience of exploitation, abuse, and violence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue International Counter-Trafficking: A Zero-Sum Game?)
14 pages, 299 KiB  
Article
Excluded but Fighting: Where Are the Voices of Sex Workers and Their Allies in EU Anti-Trafficking Policymaking?
by Irena Ferčíková Konečná
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(3), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030148 - 05 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1459
Abstract
The ‘end demand’ approach to prostitution has been popping up in Europe through the anti-trafficking debate and receives increasing attention on the international agenda. It is well recognized that improving workers’ rights, increasing unionization and collective bargaining coverage are effective strategies for tackling [...] Read more.
The ‘end demand’ approach to prostitution has been popping up in Europe through the anti-trafficking debate and receives increasing attention on the international agenda. It is well recognized that improving workers’ rights, increasing unionization and collective bargaining coverage are effective strategies for tackling trafficking. However, with regard to sexual exploitation, focus is not on these strategies but instead on the abolition of the entire sex industry with the help of criminal justice systems. In first decade after the Palermo Protocol (2000), international organizations (IGOs) promoted a human rights-based approach to tackling trafficking, aiming to balance the criminal justice focus of the protocol. This work guided states on how to maintain and protect human rights while combating human trafficking. However, the explosive issue of sex work/prostitution was minimized, with IGOs avoiding the topic due to the fragile consensus about the definition of human trafficking and state obligations. Meanwhile, sex workers’ collectives and unions globally and throughout Europe developed their own strategies on how to address widespread criminalization, discrimination, violence and exploitation, with no or very limited funding and resources—and without recognition of their work, experience and expertise. This article presents how the European Sex Workers’ Rights Alliance (ESWA) and other sex workers’ rights civil society organizations have sought to challenge the harmful impacts of the ‘end demand’ discourse and the criminalization of sex work in the name of anti-trafficking in Europe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue International Counter-Trafficking: A Zero-Sum Game?)
Back to TopTop