Biosorption and Biomineralization in Metal Removal

A special issue of Minerals (ISSN 2075-163X). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Mineralogy and Biogeochemistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2020) | Viewed by 14783

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Life and Environmental Science, Hachinohe Institute of Technology, Hachinohe, Japan
Interests: biosorption; biomineralization; metal removal; metal separation; metal recovery; microorganism; biomass

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biosorption is a process that utilizes biological materials as adsorbents, and this method has been studied by several researchers as an alternative technique to conventional methods for heavy metal removal from wastewater. On the other hand, biomineralization is the process by which living forms influence the precipitation of mineral materials. The process creates heterogeneous accumulations, composites composed of biologic (or organic) and inorganic compounds, with nonhomogeneous distributions that reflect the environment in which they form. Biosorption and biomineralizaton of some metals are often occurred in the metal removal process using microorganisms. This Special Issue aims to publish papers with appropriate examples that confirm the important role of the metal removal by biosorption and biomineralization in several types of metal ions from the aqueous system. Papers providing experimental data to evaluate the metal removal by biosorption and biomineralization are also welcome.

Prof. Dr. Takehiko Tsuruta
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Minerals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biosorption
  • biomineralization
  • metal removal
  • microorganism

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1020 KiB  
Article
Remediation of Cobalt-Contaminated Soil Using Manure, Clay, Charcoal, Zeolite, Calcium Oxide, Main Crop (Hordeum vulgare L.), and After-Crop (Synapis alba L.)
by Milena Kosiorek and Mirosław Wyszkowski
Minerals 2020, 10(5), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10050429 - 11 May 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3004
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine the effects of various substances on soil contaminated with cobalt (Co) on the mass and content of cobalt in the main crop—spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)—and the after-crop—white mustard (Synapis alba L.). Manure, clay, charcoal, [...] Read more.
This study was undertaken to determine the effects of various substances on soil contaminated with cobalt (Co) on the mass and content of cobalt in the main crop—spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)—and the after-crop—white mustard (Synapis alba L.). Manure, clay, charcoal, zeolite, and calcium oxide were used for phytostabilization. Cobalt was applied in the form of CoCl2 in doses of 0, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 mg/kg soil. Amendments in the form of manure, clay, charcoal, and zeolite were applied in an amount of 2% in relation to the weight of the soil in a pot, with calcium oxide at a dose of 1.30 g CaO/kg of soil. The highest cobalt doses resulted in a significant reduction in yield of both plants and in tolerance index for cobalt. Increasing contamination of soil with cobalt resulted in a major and significant increase in its content in plants and a reduction in cobalt translocation factor in both plants. Amendments used in phytostabilization had a significant effect on growth and development of oat and content of cobalt in plants. The strongest effect on the yield of above-ground parts was exerted by manure (both plants) and calcium oxide (white mustard), while the strongest effect on weight of roots was exerted by calcium oxide (both plants) and zeolite (white mustard). The addition of manure, zeolite and calcium oxide to soil caused an increase of the tolerance index for both plants, while the addition of clay only had a positive effect for white mustard. All substances used in phytostabilization (except zeolite) decreased cobalt content of roots, and manure and calcium oxide in above-ground parts of spring barley; manure and zeolite only in above-ground parts, and calcium oxide in both organs of white mustard. Most of them also reduced bioconcentration of cobalt in above-ground parts, calcium oxide decreased cobalt content in roots of both plants, and manure in roots of spring barley. The effect on cobalt translocation was less clear, but most substances used in phytostabilization increased the transfer of cobalt from the soil to plants. White mustard had higher ability to accumulate cobalt than spring barley. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosorption and Biomineralization in Metal Removal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1345 KiB  
Article
Microbial Gold Biosortion and Biomineralization from Aqueous HAuCl4 Solution
by Ichiro Maeda and Takehiko Tsuruta
Minerals 2020, 10(3), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10030285 - 21 Mar 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2434
Abstract
The removal of gold (III) from aqueous systems using biosorption and biomineralization by microbial cells was investigated. High levels of gold (III) were removed from a hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) solution for 72 h by microbial species, including bacteria, fungi and yeasts. Previously, we [...] Read more.
The removal of gold (III) from aqueous systems using biosorption and biomineralization by microbial cells was investigated. High levels of gold (III) were removed from a hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) solution for 72 h by microbial species, including bacteria, fungi and yeasts. Previously, we reported that the amounts of gold (III) removed through biosorption by gram-positive bacteria, fungi, and yeasts was lower than that by gram-negative bacteria. Candida krusei was able to remove large amounts of gold (III) through biosorption and biomineralization. Interestingly, more gold was removed by atomic reduction than by biosorption. Additionally, we examined time, pH, concentration and other factors affecting gold removal. The rate of gold (III) removal by C. krusei increased for 6 h, and then stabilized, however, the rate of removal increased after 22 h, and reached a second equilibrium after 68 h. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosorption and Biomineralization in Metal Removal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2286 KiB  
Article
Recovery of Copper from Leached Tailing Solutions by Biosorption
by Sonia Cortés, Elizabeth E. Soto and Javier I. Ordóñez
Minerals 2020, 10(2), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020158 - 12 Feb 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4043
Abstract
Due to the progressive fall of the ore grades and the increasingly refractory composition of minerals, concentrating plants have increased which has led to an increase in the generation of tailings. Tailings, especially those obtained in the past, have remaining copper and other [...] Read more.
Due to the progressive fall of the ore grades and the increasingly refractory composition of minerals, concentrating plants have increased which has led to an increase in the generation of tailings. Tailings, especially those obtained in the past, have remaining copper and other valuable species in quantities that can potentially be recovered, such as gold, silver, vanadium, and rare earth elements which transforms this abundant waste into a potential source of precious or strategic metals for secondary mining. One of the techniques of solid–liquid separation that processes solutions with low concentrations of metals corresponds to adsorption, and more recently biosorption, which is based on the use of biological matrices that do not constitute an environmental liability after application. Biosorption occurs as a consequence of the wide variety of active functional groups present in different types of biomass. Bacterial, fungal, plant, and algal biomasses have been described as biosorbents, mainly for the treatment of diluted and simple solutions. This work aims to recover copper from leached tailings using biomass of the red algae Gracilaria chilensis as a biosorbent. The tailing samples were taken from an abandoned deposit, in the north of Chile, and after an acid leaching copper was biosorbed, kinetics of adsorption and the equilibrium isotherms were studied, applying the Freundlich and Langmuir models. Operational parameters such as adsorbent dose, pH, and initial metal concentration were studied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosorption and Biomineralization in Metal Removal)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 6158 KiB  
Article
Bio-Precipitation of Calcium and Magnesium Ions through Extracellular and Intracellular Process Induced by Bacillus Licheniformis SRB2
by Yanyang Zhao, Huaxiao Yan, Jingxuan Zhou, Maurice E. Tucker, Mei Han, Hui Zhao, Guangzhou Mao, Yifan Zhao and Zuozhen Han
Minerals 2019, 9(9), 526; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090526 - 30 Aug 2019
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4708
Abstract
Removal of calcium and magnesium ions through biomineralization induced by bacteria has been proven to be an effective and environmentally friendly method to improve water quality, but the process and mechanism are far from fully understood. In this study, a newly isolated probiotic [...] Read more.
Removal of calcium and magnesium ions through biomineralization induced by bacteria has been proven to be an effective and environmentally friendly method to improve water quality, but the process and mechanism are far from fully understood. In this study, a newly isolated probiotic Bacillus licheniformis SRB2 (GenBank: KM884945.1) was used to induce the bio-precipitation of calcium and magnesium at various Mg/Ca molar ratios (0, 6, 8, 10, and 12) in medium with 30 g L−1 sodium chloride. Due to the increasing pH and HCO3 and CO32− concentrations caused by NH3 and carbonic anhydrase, about 98% Ca2+ and 50% Mg2+ were precipitated in 12 days. The pathways of bio-precipitation include extracellular and intracellular processes. Biominerals with more negative δ13C values (−16‰ to −18‰) were formed including calcite, vaterite, monohydrocalcite, and nesquehonite with preferred orientation. The nucleation on extracellular polymeric substances was controlled by the negatively charged amino acids and organic functional groups. The intracellular amorphous inclusions containing calcium and magnesium also contributed to the bio-precipitation. This study reveals the process and mechanism of microbial desalination for the removal of calcium and magnesium, and provides some references to explain the formation of the nesquehonite and other carbonate minerals in a natural and ancient earth surface environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosorption and Biomineralization in Metal Removal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop