Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Risk Management in Collective Wisdom Era

A special issue of Journal of Risk and Financial Management (ISSN 1911-8074). This special issue belongs to the section "Risk".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2023) | Viewed by 1875

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 10645, Taiwan
Interests: technology management; innovation; entrepreneurship; supply chain management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, No. 269, Chenghua North Road, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, China
Interests: online financing; data analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, research on crowdfunding has been explosively conducted, but much research focuses on the micro level, such as statistical analysis (e.g., Hörisch, 2018), protentional backer's investment behavior (e.g., Belleflamme, Lambert and Schwienbacher, 2014), analysis of influencing factors of a crowdfunding campaign’s financing (e.g., Wang et al., 2020), prediction of fundraising outcomes (e.g., Fan-Osuala, Zantedeschi and Jank, 2018), herding effect of investment behavior (e.g., Li et al., 2020), personal behavior analysis (e.g., Lin and Viswanathan, 2016), economic principle of crowdfunding (e.g., Agrawal, Catalini and Goldfarb, 2014), attraction analysis of crowdfunding campaigns (e.g., Colombo, Franzoni and Rossi–Lamastra, 2015), social capital (e.g., Zhang et al., 2022), risk analysis (e.g., Wasiuzzaman, 2021) and so on. 

We find that these studies pay less attention to the risk and financial mangement from a collective wisdom perspective. Collective wisdom is different from individual decision making. Take crowdfunding as an example: crowdfunding is changing enterprise, innovation, entrepreneurship and organization, expanding a new financing mode, and profoundly altering forms of communication. Enterprise and organizations can operate in a more open way. On macro level, the economic benefits brought by crowdfunding should not be underestimated. What policies should the government adopt to deal with the risk? How can we deal with the relationship with traditional financial industry? How can we apply the crowdfunding model to traditional industries and control its risks? In addition, the pros and cons of crowdfunding in other areas are not clear. For example, how does the crowd or citizen science model change the existing scientific research model? These are research questions that have not been widely and deeply studied.

We welcome research results on crowdfunding or similar activities at different levels. Potential topics include but are not limited to the following:

  • Crowdfunding on organizations;
  • Crowdfunding on company operation;
  • Investment on the local and remote crowdfunding campaigns;
  • Crowdfunding model in scientific research (citizen science);
  • Crowdfunding on government policy;
  • Crowdfunding on intellectual property;
  • Crowdfunding on innovation in specific areas;
  • Crowdfunding and knowledge plagiarism;
  • Some other collective wisdom campaigns;
  • Risk and financial management in innovation;
  • Risk and financial management in entrepreneurship. 

References

Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2014). "Some simple economics of crowdfunding". Innovation policy and the economy, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 63-97.

Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). "Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd". Journal of business venturing, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 585-609.

Colombo, M.G., Franzoni, C. and Rossi–Lamastra, C. (2015). "Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding". Entrepreneurship theory and practice, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 75-100.

Fan-Osuala, O., Zantedeschi, D. and Jank, W. (2018). "Using past contribution patterns to forecast fundraising outcomes in crowdfunding". International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 30-44.

Hörisch, J. (2018). "'Think big'or'small is beautiful'? An empirical analysis of characteristics and determinants of success of sustainable crowdfunding projects". International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 111-29.

Li, Y., Liu, F., Fan, W., Lim, E.T. and Liu, Y. (2020). "Exploring the impact of initial herd on overfunding in equity crowdfunding". Information & Management, p. 103269.

Lin, M. and Viswanathan, S. (2016). "Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market". Management Science, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 1393-414.

Wang, W., Chen, W., Zhu, K. and Wang, H. (2020). "Emphasizing the entrepreneur or the idea? The impact of text content emphasis on investment decisions in crowdfunding". Decision Support Systems, Vol. 136, p. 113341.

Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). "Regulations, perceived information quality and perceived risk of equity crowdfunding: A study of Malaysian investors". Strategic Change, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 353-66.

Zhang, X., Liu, X., Wang, X., Zhao, H. and Zhang, W. (2022). "Exploring the Effects of Social Capital on Crowdfunding Performance: A holistic analysis from the empirical and predictive views". Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 126, p. 107011. 

Prof. Dr. Yenchun Jim Wu
Dr. Wei Wang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Risk and Financial Management is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • innovation
  • entrepreneurship
  • risk management
  • crowdfunding
  • citizen science

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 333 KiB  
Article
Innovation Output and Idiosyncratic Volatility: US Evidence
by Naji Mohammad Alshammasi and Adel Abdulkarim Almomen
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2023, 16(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010024 - 30 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1270
Abstract
Firms engaging in innovative practices have patents to prevent competitive forces from eroding the resulting economic rents; however, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of innovation on risk. We shed new light on how firms’ involvement in innovation activities impacts their volatility, [...] Read more.
Firms engaging in innovative practices have patents to prevent competitive forces from eroding the resulting economic rents; however, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of innovation on risk. We shed new light on how firms’ involvement in innovation activities impacts their volatility, particularly their idiosyncratic volatility. In this paper, we empirically examine the effect of innovation on idiosyncratic volatility. To do so, we empirically examine the impact of innovation, measured by patents weighted by citations and R&D expenditure, on the idiosyncratic volatility of firms. Using a large sample of 8256 US firms, we find that more innovation is associated with lower idiosyncratic volatility. We also find that information uncertainty is the channel through which innovation affects idiosyncratic risk. The results are robust for different measures of idiosyncratic volatility. These results have empirical implications for investors, managers, and firms engaging in innovation-related activities. Full article
Back to TopTop