ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Using a Health Equity Framework in Research to Address Unmet Social Needs

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (27 March 2023) | Viewed by 9931

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
2. Office for Community Health, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Interests: community-engaged research; diabetes; food insecurity; gender theory; health equity/health disparities; political economy of health; qualitative research methods; social needs screening; immigrant health; social isolation; depression; basic adult education/GED

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As many of you are aware, first introduced in the 1940s, social ecology is a seminal theoretical model in public health research. The idea that an individual’s health and well-being are influenced by factors at multiple “levels” countered the tendency to approach health narrowly in terms of seemingly autonomous and self-contained individuals. However, although the model encompasses the idea of a broader health “ecology” or “environment,” it still generally lacks theoretical complexity about mechanisms and pathways of influence or their intersections.

However, as socio-ecological innovations in public health research gained momentum, the emphasis evolved. Previously underappreciated domains of an individual’s life outside the realm of healthcare were increasingly acknowledged as factors significantly influencing health outcomes. With growing recognition of the extent to which social and structural factors outside of the control of individuals are key drivers of health outcomes—often more so than the healthcare system itself—the concept of social determinants of health (SDoH) emerged as a more holistic and integrated way to think about individuals as located within an even more complex context—an environment more broadly defined. As a result, the concept of SDoH has drawn attention to disparate health outcomes and the social and structural dynamics that produce them. This “health disparities” lens is important for revealing unjust and inequitable geographies of health risk, disease, suffering, and death. Furthermore, in parallel with these paradigm changes, there is growing recognition that community engagement and stakeholder involvement are essential to improving health outcomes.

SDoH thinking has produced valuable innovations in healthcare, health research, and funding. These innovations are reflected in the now large body of SDoH literature. There is an increased emphasis on identifying and addressing social needs, and on “upstream strategies” such as multisectoral collaboration, “collective impact,” and policy change. Community engagement has been further prioritized with ongoing refinement of strategies for enabling equitable participation of diverse stakeholders. However, as the SDoH paradigm has become embedded in healthcare and public health circles, too often understanding of SDoH still remains tied to a static, one-dimensional conceptualization of context using a narrow socio-ecological emphasis on “barriers” and “promotors.” As my colleagues and I previously argued, acknowledging that individuals exist within a context of social determinants does not necessarily lead to the investigation of how those social determinants operate. As such, theoretical frameworks such as structural violence, intersectionality, and syndemics, and the incorporation of life-course approaches in research, provide opportunities to illuminate the structures, mechanisms, and pathways that operate through complex, intersecting webs of influence to become the SDoH that shape health and social landscapes in both negative and positive ways.

Similarly, the health disparities focus that importantly drew our attention to inequitable health outcomes has been embraced by researchers, providers, and funders, transforming, to some extent, the way that resources are allocated, the goal of research studies, and the content of public health literature. However, disparity framing has also been critiqued as failing to disrupt deficit narratives and thinking that can operate to reproduce oppression and inequality. Health disparities and social inequality do not merely exist as a reflection of some assumed “natural” state of affairs, they are constantly produced and reproduced through quotidian dynamics of everyday life.

It has become increasingly clear that we need critical dialogues about positionality, privilege, and power to produce a more complete and integrated understanding of the way that health and wellbeing are socially constructed with attention to the racial, ethnic, social, and economic power structures undergirding these processes. Research frameworks that emphasize health equity and align with participatory, community-engaged practices are providing new powerful tools in this regard. This Special Edition is seeking submissions from scholars working in this domain in order to contribute to the knowledge base of equity as a guiding principle in research to address social needs.

Call for Submissions

The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) is accepting submissions for a Special Issue on “Using an Equity Framework in Research to Address Unmet Social Needs.” The “environmental” focus of this call is broadly defined to refer to social, structural, and physical domains, including but not limited to economics, social relationships, education, politics, health systems, religious institutions, culture, the food environment/system, policy, racism, structural racism, and hierarchies of race, class, gender, and ethnicity. Submissions that use social determinants of health, structural violence, intersectionality, syndemic, and life-course approaches that investigate social dynamics and mechanisms, and problematize complexity are encouraged. Authors should identify the equity framework that was used and include discussion of any relevant racial, ethnic, social, and economic power dynamics and structures.

New research papers, reviews, case reports and papers describing important lessons learned are welcome to this issue. Other manuscript types accepted include methodological papers, process papers, position papers, brief reports, and commentaries. We will accept manuscripts from diverse disciplines including social sciences (e.g., anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science), health sciences, health systems research, epidemiology, and population health/public health.

Dr. Janet Page-Reeves
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • health equity
  • social needs
  • social determinants of health (SDoH)
  • structural violence
  • intersectionality
  • syndemics
  • life-course

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

36 pages, 2629 KiB  
Article
Integrating Health into Local Plans: A Comparative Review of Health Requirements for Urban Development in Seven Local Planning Authorities in England
by Rosalie Callway, Anna Le Gouais, Emma L. Bird, Michael Chang and Judi Kidger
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 4079; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054079 - 24 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3668
Abstract
A local plan is a statutory policy document that supports urban development decisions across a local government area in England. Local plans are reported to need more specific requirements for development proposals regarding wider health determinants to address potential health outcomes and health [...] Read more.
A local plan is a statutory policy document that supports urban development decisions across a local government area in England. Local plans are reported to need more specific requirements for development proposals regarding wider health determinants to address potential health outcomes and health inequalities. This study reviews the integration of Health in Local Plans of seven local planning authorities through documentary analysis methods. A review framework was formulated based on health and planning literature regarding local plans, health policy and determinants of health and dialogue with a local government partner. The findings identify opportunities to strengthen the consideration of Health in Local Plans, including ensuring that policies are informed by local health priorities and signpost national guidance, strengthening health-related requirements for developers (e.g., indoor air quality, fuel poverty and security of tenure) and improving implementation of requirements for developers (e.g., through adoption of health management plans and community ownership). The study identifies further research needs regarding how policies are interpreted by developers in practice, and on national guidance for Health Impact Assessment. It highlights the benefit of undertaking a comparative review, contrasting local plan policy language and identifying opportunities to share, adapt and strengthen planning requirements regarding health outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 394 KiB  
Article
Health Psychology Services for People in Disadvantaged Regions of Hungary: Experiences from the Primary Health Care Development Model Program
by Viola Sallay, Tamás Martos, Lilla Lucza, Orsolya Papp-Zipernovszky and Márta Csabai
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 3900; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053900 - 22 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1558
Abstract
Background: The importance of community health psychology in providing complex bio-psycho-social care is well documented. We present a mixed-method outcome-monitoring study of health psychology services in the public-health-focused Primary Health Care Development Model Program (2012–2017) in four disadvantaged micro-regions in northeast Hungary. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: The importance of community health psychology in providing complex bio-psycho-social care is well documented. We present a mixed-method outcome-monitoring study of health psychology services in the public-health-focused Primary Health Care Development Model Program (2012–2017) in four disadvantaged micro-regions in northeast Hungary. Methods: Study 1 assessed the availability of the services using a sample of 17,003 respondents. Study 2 applied a follow-up design to measure the mental health outcomes of the health psychology services on a sample of 132 clients. In Study 3, we conducted focus-group interviews to assess clients’ lived experiences. Results: More mental health issues and higher education predicted a higher probability of service use. Follow-up showed that individual and group-based psychological interventions resulted in less depression and (marginally) higher well-being. Thematic analysis of the focus-group interviews indicated that participants deemed topics such as psychoeducation, greater acceptance of psychological support, and heightened awareness of individual and community support important. Conclusions: The results of the monitoring study demonstrate the important role health psychology services can play in primary healthcare in disadvantaged regions in Hungary. Community health psychology can improve well-being, reduce inequality, raise the population’s health awareness, and address unmet social needs in disadvantaged regions. Full article
15 pages, 354 KiB  
Article
Intersectionality-Informed Sex/Gender-Sensitivity in Public Health Monitoring and Reporting (PHMR): A Case Study Assessing Stratification on an “Intersectional Gender-Score”
by Emily Mena, Katharina Stahlmann, Klaus Telkmann, Gabriele Bolte and on behalf of the AdvanceGender Study Group
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032220 - 26 Jan 2023
Viewed by 1880
Abstract
To date, PHMR has often relied on male/female stratification, but rarely considers the complex, intersecting social positions of men and women in describing the prevalence of health and disease. Stratification on an Intersectional Gender-Score (IG-Score), which is based on a variety of social [...] Read more.
To date, PHMR has often relied on male/female stratification, but rarely considers the complex, intersecting social positions of men and women in describing the prevalence of health and disease. Stratification on an Intersectional Gender-Score (IG-Score), which is based on a variety of social covariables, would allow comparison of the prevalence of individuals who share the same complex intersectional profile (IG-Score). The cross-sectional case study was based on the German Socio-Economic Panel 2017 (n = 23,269 age 18+). After stratification, covariable-balance within the total sample and IG-Score-subgroups was assessed by standardized mean differences. Prevalence of self-rated health, mental distress, depression and hypertension was compared in men and women. In the IG-Score-subgroup with highest proportion of males and lowest probability of falling into the ‘woman’-category, most individuals were in full-time employment. The IG-Score-subgroup with highest proportion of women and highest probability of falling into the ‘woman’-category was characterized by part-time/occasional employment, housewife/-husband, and maternity/parental leave. Gender differences in prevalence of health indicators remained within the male-dominated IG-Score-subgroup, whereas the same prevalence of depression and self-rated health was observed for men and women constituting the female-dominated IG-Score-subgroup. These results might indicate that sex/gender differences of depression and self-rated health could be interpreted against the background of gender associated processes. In summary, the proposed procedure allows comparison of prevalence of health indicators conditional on men and women sharing the same complex intersectional profile. Full article
17 pages, 856 KiB  
Article
“It Made Me Feel like Things Are Starting to Change in Society:” A Qualitative Study to Foster Positive Patient Experiences during Phone-Based Social Needs Interventions
by Anna L. Steeves-Reece, Christina Nicolaidis, Dawn M. Richardson, Melissa Frangie, Katherin Gomez-Arboleda, Chrystal Barnes, Minnie Kang, Bruce Goldberg, Stephan R. Lindner and Melinda M. Davis
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912668 - 3 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2141
Abstract
Many healthcare organizations are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Due to both the COVID-19 pandemic and limited time during clinical visits, much of this screening is now happening by phone. To promote healing and avoid [...] Read more.
Many healthcare organizations are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Due to both the COVID-19 pandemic and limited time during clinical visits, much of this screening is now happening by phone. To promote healing and avoid harm, it is vital to understand patient experiences and recommendations regarding these activities. We conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a HRSN intervention. We applied maximum variation sampling, completed recruitment and interviews by phone, and carried out an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. From August to November 2021 we interviewed 34 patients, developed 6 themes, and used these themes to create a framework for generating positive patient experiences during phone-based HRSN interventions. First, we found patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention. Second, we identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience: transparency and respect for patient autonomy; kind demeanor; genuine intention to help; and attentiveness and responsiveness to patients’ situations. Finally, we found patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources. Healthcare organizations can incorporate our framework into trainings for team members carrying out phone-based HRSN interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop