Carcinogenesis as an Evolutionary Process

A special issue of Genes (ISSN 2073-4425). This special issue belongs to the section "Population and Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 November 2022) | Viewed by 3186

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
Interests: molecular biology; protein science; genomics; evolutionary biology; protein evolution; genome evolution
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the last two decades, significant advance in genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics have given us insights into the molecular details of cancer evolution. These studies have confirmed that tumors evolve from normal tissues by acquiring a series of genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic changes with concomitant alterations in the control of the proliferation, survival, and spread of affected cells. In the first phase of carcinogenesis, a cell may acquire a mutation that permits it to proliferate abnormally. In the next phase, other mutations allow for the expansion of cell number and this process of mutations continues, thus generating a primary tumor that can eventually metastasize in distant organs. According to current estimates, the number of cancer-driving mutations needed for the full development of cancer ranges from two to eight, depending on the cancer type. On average, cancer genomes contain four to five driver mutations. Analyses of the mutation landscapes and evolutionary trajectories of various tumor tissues have identified a constrained set of driver genes (e.g., BRAF, KRAS, TP53, RB, or APC) as the key genes whose mutation is most likely to initiate carcinogenesis. Significantly, the mutation rate of these genes in tumors far exceeds those of other genes, suggesting that their mutations are subject to positive selection during tumor evolution. Several types of approaches exploit this principle for the identification of genes that drive carcinogenesis: the rate of mutation of ‘driver genes’ must be significantly higher in the tumor tissue than those of ‘passenger genes’ that play no role in the development of cancer but simply happen to mutate in the same tumor.  

As a result of combined efforts, in 2020 the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) study identified a total of 722 protein-coding genes as cancer driver genes and 22 non-coding driver mutations, leading to the conclusion that the core of the mission of cancer-genome sequencing projects—to provide a catalogue of driver mutations that could give rise to cancer—has been achieved. It is noteworthy, however, that although on average cancer genomes were shown to contain four to five driver mutations, in a significant proportion of cases no drivers were identified in tumors, suggesting that a rather large fraction of cancer driver genes remain to be identified.   

Another outstanding problem concerns the existence of tumor essential genes, i.e., genes whose functional integrity is essential for the growth and survival of tumor cells that is thus expected to be subject to negative selection. Although several groups have investigated the role of negative selection in tumor evolution, the results are controversial as some studies have reached the conclusion that negative selection has no role in tumor evolution.  

This Special Issue aims to focus on the toolkit of cancer driver genes and tumor essential genes. The significance of this question is that novel driver genes and tumor essential genes may prove to be valuable targets for cancer therapy.

 

Prof. Dr. Laszlo Patthy
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cancer evolution
  • cancer gene
  • driver gene
  • positive selection
  • passenger gene
  • purifying selection
  • tumor essential gene

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 1762 KiB  
Article
Unaffected Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Carrier Parent Demonstrates Allele-Specific mRNA Stabilization of Wild-Type TP53 Compared to Affected Offspring
by Jeffrey S. Buzby, Shirley A. Williams and Diane J. Nugent
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2302; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122302 - 7 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1419
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant disorder where an oncogenic TP53 germline mutation is inherited by offspring of a carrier parent. p53 is a key tumor suppressor regulating cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Unexpectedly, some mutant TP53 carriers remain [...] Read more.
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant disorder where an oncogenic TP53 germline mutation is inherited by offspring of a carrier parent. p53 is a key tumor suppressor regulating cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Unexpectedly, some mutant TP53 carriers remain unaffected, while their children develop cancer early in life. To begin unravelling this paradox, the response of dermal fibroblasts (dFb) isolated from a child with LFS was compared to those from her unaffected father after UV exposure. Phospho-Chk1[S345], a key activator of cell cycle arrest, was increased by UV induction in the LFS patient compared to their unaffected parent dFb. This result, along with previous findings of reduced CDKN1A/p21 UV induction in affected dFb, suggest that cell cycle dysregulation may contribute to cancer onset in the affected LFS subject but not the unaffected parent. Mutant p53 protein and its promoter binding affinity were also higher in dFb from the LFS patient compared to their unaffected parent. These results were as predicted based on decreased mutant TP53 allele-specific mRNA expression previously found in unaffected dFb. Investigation of the potential mechanism regulating this TP53 allele-specific expression found that, while epigenetic promoter methylation was not detectable, TP53 wild-type mRNA was specifically stabilized in the unaffected dFb. Hence, the allele-specific stabilization of wild-type TP53 mRNA may allow an unaffected parent to counteract genotoxic stress by means more characteristic of homozygous wild-type TP53 individuals than their affected offspring, providing protection from the oncogenesis associated with LFS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carcinogenesis as an Evolutionary Process)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 2232 KiB  
Hypothesis
The Theory of Carcino-Evo-Devo and Its Non-Trivial Predictions
by A. P. Kozlov
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2347; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122347 - 12 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1422
Abstract
To explain the sources of additional cell masses in the evolution of multicellular organisms, the theory of carcino-evo-devo, or evolution by tumor neofunctionalization, has been developed. The important demand for a new theory in experimental science is the capability to formulate non-trivial [...] Read more.
To explain the sources of additional cell masses in the evolution of multicellular organisms, the theory of carcino-evo-devo, or evolution by tumor neofunctionalization, has been developed. The important demand for a new theory in experimental science is the capability to formulate non-trivial predictions which can be experimentally confirmed. Several non-trivial predictions were formulated using carcino-evo-devo theory, four of which are discussed in the present paper: (1) The number of cellular oncogenes should correspond to the number of cell types in the organism. The evolution of oncogenes, tumor suppressor and differentiation gene classes should proceed concurrently. (2) Evolutionarily new and evolving genes should be specifically expressed in tumors (TSEEN genes). (3) Human orthologs of fish TSEEN genes should acquire progressive functions connected with new cell types, tissues and organs. (4) Selection of tumors for new functions in the organism is possible. Evolutionarily novel organs should recapitulate tumor features in their development. As shown in this paper, these predictions have been confirmed by the laboratory of the author. Thus, we have shown that carcino-evo-devo theory has predictive power, fulfilling a fundamental requirement for a new theory. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carcinogenesis as an Evolutionary Process)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop