Radiomics and Imaging in Cancer Analysis

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Methods and Technologies Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 10 December 2024 | Viewed by 3023

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Medical Physics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Bologna, Italy
Interests: medical physics; radiology optimization process; radiomics; artificial intelligence applications in medicine

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Interests: radiotherapy; nuclear medicine; dosimetry and radiobiology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, radiomics has been at the forefront of extensive medical research, showing its potential translational ability, especially in oncology, to support cancer diagnosis, prognosis, or the prediction of treatment responses and benefits. However, there is still much to be achieved regarding the methodological aspects of radiomics, so as to produce robust and trustable tools for clinical practice.

We are pleased to invite you to submit an article on this topic in this Special Issue entitled "Radiomics and Imaging in Cancer Analysis". This Special Issue aims to collect ten high-quality articles delving into the application of radiomics in various oncological fields and highlighting its potential, without neglecting the possible causes of error/traps that may affect these analyses. In particular, it is interesting to explore future trends in the application of these techniques so that they may contribute effectively to clinical practice.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the methodological aspects of the application of radiomics in oncology, new methods that may be employed to validate the quality of radiomics study, and a discussion of the future of this technique in light of the increasing diffusion of deep learning methods.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Marco Bertolini
Dr. Lidia Strigari
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Dr. Marco Bertolini
Dr. Lidia Strigari
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • radiomics
  • biomarker
  • cancer imaging
  • machine learning
  • oncology

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

25 pages, 4595 KiB  
Article
Clinical Use of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Software for Autocontouring in Radiation Therapy: Geometric Performance and Dosimetric Impact
by S M Hasibul Hoque, Giovanni Pirrone, Fabio Matrone, Alessandra Donofrio, Giuseppe Fanetti, Angela Caroli, Rahnuma Shahrin Rista, Roberto Bortolus, Michele Avanzo, Annalisa Drigo and Paola Chiovati
Cancers 2023, 15(24), 5735; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245735 - 07 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1911
Abstract
Purpose: When autocontouring based on artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, the contours are reviewed and eventually adjusted by a radiation oncologist before an RT treatment plan is generated, with the purpose of improving dosimetry [...] Read more.
Purpose: When autocontouring based on artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, the contours are reviewed and eventually adjusted by a radiation oncologist before an RT treatment plan is generated, with the purpose of improving dosimetry and reducing both interobserver variability and time for contouring. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of application of a commercial AI-based autocontouring for RT, assessing both geometric accuracies and the influence on optimized dose from automatically generated contours after review by human operator. Materials and Methods: A commercial autocontouring system was applied to a retrospective database of 40 patients, of which 20 were treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa) and 20 for head and neck cancer (HNC). Contours resulting from AI were compared against AI contours reviewed by human operator and human-only contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and relative volume difference (RVD). Dosimetric indices such as Dmean, D0.03cc, and normalized plan quality metrics were used to compare dose distributions from RT plans generated from structure sets contoured by humans assisted by AI against plans from manual contours. The reduction in contouring time obtained by using automated tools was also assessed. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was computed to assess the significance of differences. Interobserver variability of the comparison of manual vs. AI-assisted contours was also assessed among two radiation oncologists for PCa. Results: For PCa, AI-assisted segmentation showed good agreement with expert radiation oncologist structures with average DSC among patients ≥ 0.7 for all structures, and minimal radiation oncology adjustment of structures (DSC of adjusted versus AI structures ≥ 0.91). For HNC, results of comparison between manual and AI contouring varied considerably e.g., 0.77 for oral cavity and 0.11–0.13 for brachial plexus, but again, adjustment was generally minimal (DSC of adjusted against AI contours 0.97 for oral cavity, 0.92–0.93 for brachial plexus). The difference in dose for the target and organs at risk were not statistically significant between human and AI-assisted, with the only exceptions of D0.03cc to the anal canal and Dmean to the brachial plexus. The observed average differences in plan quality for PCa and HNC cases were 8% and 6.7%, respectively. The dose parameter changes due to interobserver variability in PCa were small, with the exception of the anal canal, where large dose variations were observed. The reduction in time required for contouring was 72% for PCa and 84% for HNC. Conclusions: When an autocontouring system is used in combination with human review, the time of the RT workflow is significantly reduced without affecting dose distribution and plan quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics and Imaging in Cancer Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 286 KiB  
Review
Radiogenomics: Contemporary Applications in the Management of Rectal Cancer
by Niall J. O’Sullivan, Hugo C. Temperley, Michelle T. Horan, Alison Corr, Brian J. Mehigan, John O. Larkin, Paul H. McCormick, Dara O. Kavanagh, James F. M. Meaney and Michael E. Kelly
Cancers 2023, 15(24), 5816; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245816 - 12 Dec 2023
Viewed by 859
Abstract
Radiogenomics, a sub-domain of radiomics, refers to the prediction of underlying tumour biology using non-invasive imaging markers. This novel technology intends to reduce the high costs, workload and invasiveness associated with traditional genetic testing via the development of ‘imaging biomarkers’ that have the [...] Read more.
Radiogenomics, a sub-domain of radiomics, refers to the prediction of underlying tumour biology using non-invasive imaging markers. This novel technology intends to reduce the high costs, workload and invasiveness associated with traditional genetic testing via the development of ‘imaging biomarkers’ that have the potential to serve as an alternative ‘liquid-biopsy’ in the determination of tumour biological characteristics. Radiogenomics also harnesses the potential to unlock aspects of tumour biology which are not possible to assess by conventional biopsy-based methods, such as full tumour burden, intra-/inter-lesion heterogeneity and the possibility of providing the information of tumour biology longitudinally. Several studies have shown the feasibility of developing a radiogenomic-based signature to predict treatment outcomes and tumour characteristics; however, many lack prospective, external validation. We performed a systematic review of the current literature surrounding the use of radiogenomics in rectal cancer to predict underlying tumour biology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics and Imaging in Cancer Analysis)
Back to TopTop