Seismic Risk Assessment of Buildings: Results of the Italian MARS Project and Other Applications Worldwide

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Building Structures".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 January 2024) | Viewed by 1568

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genoa, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genoa, Italy
Interests: masonry buildings; assessment of existing structures; preservation of historical structures; nonlinear modeling; seismic risk assessment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
Interests: seismic risk; reinforced concrete structures; assessment and retrofitting of existing buildings; experimental evaluation of materials; mitigation strategies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The evaluation at a large scale of seismic risk maps is a challenging and crucial task to correctly predict potential future losses, to plan emergency management procedures, and to define effective mitigation policies.

Seismic input should be defined through a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, or a scenario-based assessment may be performed at regional or urban scale. The inventory of the built environment is another crucial issue, which requires the classification into homogeneous sets on the base of the available taxonomy (structural material, building age, number of stories, etc.) and characterized by a combination of specific regional structural features which are relevant for the vulnerability.

The fundamental step of seismic risk analysis is the assessment of the building’s vulnerability, in terms of fragility curves that may be derived through different approaches (empirical, mechanical, hybrid, etc.). Scientific papers are expected both on residential and strategic or special buildings.

The evaluation of consequences (casualties, unusable buildings, etc.) and economic losses (direct and indirect) is another topic of this Special Issue.

This Special Issue will collect the main results of MARS (Seismic Risk and Damage Maps in Italy), a big national project funded by the Civil Protection Agency, within the activities of the ReLUIS consortium (Network of the University Laboratories of Seismic Engineering). The aim is to compare the developed procedures with other experiences worldwide; hence, other contributions are welcome.

We look forward to your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Sergio Lagomarsino
Prof. Dr. Angelo Masi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • seismic risk analysis
  • taxonomy and classification of buildings
  • seismic vulnerability
  • fragility curves
  • losses and consequence functions
  • damage scenarios and risk maps
  • strengthening for the risk mitigation

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 14187 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Fragility Sets to Assess the Effectiveness of Retrofit Interventions on Masonry Buildings in Italy
by Veronica Follador, Pietro Carpanese, Marco Donà, Sara Alfano, Serena Cattari, Sergio Lagomarsino and Francesca da Porto
Buildings 2023, 13(12), 2937; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122937 - 24 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 554
Abstract
Seismic events that have occurred in Italy in recent decades have shown the significant vulnerability of the Italian building stock. In particular, residential masonry buildings have suffered serious damage, highlighting the need to plan effective mitigation strategies as soon as possible. In this [...] Read more.
Seismic events that have occurred in Italy in recent decades have shown the significant vulnerability of the Italian building stock. In particular, residential masonry buildings have suffered serious damage, highlighting the need to plan effective mitigation strategies as soon as possible. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of possible retrofit interventions for masonry buildings. Fragility curves of macro-classes of residential masonry buildings have been developed in both as-built and retrofitted conditions within the DPC-ReLUIS agreement (Department of Civil Protection—Network of University Laboratories for Earthquake Engineering). In particular, three sets of fragility curves, developed by the University of Padova (UniPD) and the University of Genova (UniGEa and UniGEb) are discussed and compared herein. The three models show similar estimates of the expected structural improvements for the examined retrofit interventions when applied to the building macro-classes, although some differences, due to the different analysis approaches, can be observed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4462 KiB  
Article
Loss Functions for the Risk Assessment of Residential Buildings
by Marco Di Ludovico, Giuseppina De Martino, Vincenzo Manfredi, Angelo Masi, Andrea Prota, Luigi Sorrentino and Maria Zucconi
Buildings 2023, 13(11), 2817; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112817 - 10 Nov 2023
Viewed by 622
Abstract
Within the ReLUIS 2019–2021 research project (Network of the University Laboratories of Seismic Engineering) supported by the Civil Protection Department (DPC), the Work Package WP4 “Seismic Risk and Damage Maps at National scale—MARS” aimed to update the 2018 version of the National Risk [...] Read more.
Within the ReLUIS 2019–2021 research project (Network of the University Laboratories of Seismic Engineering) supported by the Civil Protection Department (DPC), the Work Package WP4 “Seismic Risk and Damage Maps at National scale—MARS” aimed to update the 2018 version of the National Risk Assessment (NRA). One of the goals of the WP4—MARS was to collect, analyse and upgrade loss models to estimate direct economic losses, unusable buildings and casualties (Task 4.4—“Risk: evaluation of consequences and economic losses”). Task 4.4 aimed to carry out a critical review of the models available in the literature and subsequently specific comparisons to better understand the capability and reliability of the different models, in particular those adopted to calculate the seismic losses in the 2018 NRA. Furthermore, the derivation of new models in order to improve the results of the previous study was another goal of the project. The paper focuses on the assessment and calibration of models and tools to derive human casualties (deaths and injured) and usability rating as well as repair costs and population assistance costs associated with residential buildings damaged by seismic actions. In detail, the available literature on Casualty Estimation Models (CEMs) is analysed, and an updated model is calibrated to estimate human casualties for the Italian context. The model emphasises a relationship between the casualties and the severity of the damage. A strong correlation exists between the post-earthquake usability of buildings, damage state (DS), repair costs and time required to assist the population. According to data collected in the reconstruction processes of recent Italian earthquakes, fragility curves in terms of loss-of-usability for partially unusable and unusable buildings and the correlation between usability ratings (immediately available post-earthquake) and DS (easily computable by using existing empirical- or mechanical-based fragility functions) are defined. Finally, consequence functions able to associate direct costs (repair costs) and indirect costs (population assistance) have been calibrated as a function of buildings’ usability or damage state. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop