Research on Nascent Innovative Entrepreneurship

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2024) | Viewed by 5339

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia
Interests: entrepreneurship; entrepreneurial process; sustainable entrepreneurship; entrepreneurship education; technology/innovative entrepreneurship
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia
Interests: innovation studies; entrepreneurship education; innovation policy; business administration; technology transfer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Innovative entrepreneurship appears as one engine for developing a knowledge-based society in modern times. Innovative entrepreneurs channel new knowledge and technological opportunities into products and services, the need of which could not have been imagined a few decades ago. Digital technology and the Internet have fundamentally transformed people's behaviour and habits. We experienced the importance of biotechnology in the search for a vaccine during the COVID crisis. These manifestations illustrate the connection between new scientific knowledge and everyday life.

Entrepreneurship is a process phenomenon (Shane, 2012; Moroz and Hindle, 2012). The current Special Issue deals with nascent entrepreneurship, which mediates new knowledge to real life, characterised by its innovativeness. According to Schumpeter (2013/1949), an entrepreneur introduces innovation into the market. However, innovation in this context, besides the novelty, also means the process from the idea to its application on the market. That means the innovative entrepreneur carries entrepreneurial and innovation processes together, probably not distinguishing them from each other. 

In order to understand the emergence of innovative nascent entrepreneurship, it is necessary to find answers to some essential questions: (1) how do opportunities for the creation of innovative ventures arise? (2) Where do innovative ideas come from? (3) Who implements these ideas of launching innovative ventures and how? These are questions about the entrepreneurial process and journey on both a societal and an individual level. However, this is, in part, the task of better understanding the entrepreneurial process, knowledge of which has developed very little in the last thirty years (Davidsson and Gruenhagen, 2021).

Entrepreneurial opportunities are a widely discussed topic to which there is no single answer, whether they are so-called objectively exciting and need to be discovered, are created by the entrepreneur (Alvarez and Barney, 2007), or are a combination of the two. This situation has raised the question about the definition and operationalisation of opportunity (e.g., Davidsson, 2015). Regardless of different interpretations, we can state that the opportunities (in a more general sense) to implement innovative ideas depend on the entrepreneurial/start-up ecosystem (Stam, 2015; Isenberg, 2010). The combination of entrepreneurial ecosystems with digital (Song, 2019) and other (Trabskaja and Mets, 2019) ecosystems should be considered. The specific opportunities and ecosystems and the impact of their so-called instruments—incubators and accelerators—on emerging innovative start-up processes, among other topics, could be answered in this Special Issue.

In addition to the ecosystem, research institutions, including universities, should be noted as new knowledge sources from which spin-off start-ups emerge. Universities contribute, besides research, by educating digitally competent generations and enabling digital entrepreneurship. Some innovative nascent ventures implementing new business models with support from venture capital grow fast, scaling-up businesses and becoming 'unicorns' (e.g., Piaskowska et al., 2021). The development trajectory analysis of knowledge-intensive start-ups in the (technology) knowledge, market extent, time, and any other dimension could be a better understanding for society on how to deal with these challenges.

The preceding is only a brief introduction to the field of the Special Issue 'Research on Innovative Nascent Entrepreneurship'. Qualitative and quantitative research articles that reveal the multifaceted nature of innovative nascent entrepreneurship and its contribution to the development of the knowledge of society are welcome. Expected articles include theory building, review, policy, and empirical studies. The topics should include the keywords below but are not limited to the list.

References (optional)

Alvarez, A., and Barney, B. 2007. Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal (1): 11–26.

Davidsson, P. 2015. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualisation. Journal of Business Venturing 30 (5): 1-22.

Davidsson, P. and J. H. Gruenhagen. 2020. Fulfilling the Process Promise: A Review and Agenda for New Venture Creation Process Research. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice 45(5): 1083–1118.

Isenberg, D.J. 2010. How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review June: 41-50.

Malerba, Franco, and Maureen McKelvey. 2019. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship 14(6): 555-681.

Moroz, P. W. and Hindle, K. 2012. Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 36(4): 781-818.

OECD (2005). Oslo-Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. 3rd edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Piaskowska, D., Tippmann, E. and Monaghan, S., 2021. Scale-up modes: Profiling activity configurations in scaling strategies. Long Range Planning 54(6): 102101.

Schumpeter, J.A., 2013. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London & New York: Routledge.

Song, A. K., 2019. The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—a critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics 53(3): 569-590.

Stam, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies 23(9): 1759-1769.

Trabskaja, J. and Mets, T., 2019. Ecosystem as the source of entrepreneurial opportunities. Foresight and STI Governance 13(4): .2500-2597.

Prof. Dr. Tõnis Mets 
Dr. Kärt Rõigas
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nascent entrepreneurship
  • innovative entrepreneurship
  • digital innovation
  • high growth entrepreneurship
  • high-technology entrepreneurship
  • unicorns
  • entrepreneurial startup process
  • entrepreneurial journey
  • process-based model
  • startup ecosystem
  • incubators
  • accelerators

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 788 KiB  
Article
Entrepreneurship and Innovation—Process Overlap or the Same? Systematic Overview and Converging Process-Dynamic Model
by Piia Vettik-Leemet and Tõnis Mets
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020038 - 19 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1960
Abstract
Recently, there has been increased discussion of entrepreneurship and innovation as process-based phenomena. However, research on the essence of dynamic entrepreneurial and innovation processes and their simultaneous interactions needs to be more cohesive and well-covered. This article critically reviews prior publications and explores [...] Read more.
Recently, there has been increased discussion of entrepreneurship and innovation as process-based phenomena. However, research on the essence of dynamic entrepreneurial and innovation processes and their simultaneous interactions needs to be more cohesive and well-covered. This article critically reviews prior publications and explores the process approach to entrepreneurial and innovation processes. Structuration and equivalence theory, systems and design thinking, and pattern matching theory were implemented to structure and synthesise a converged operationalised dynamic process model. Exploring different approaches to entrepreneurial and innovation processes by screening 468 publications on entrepreneurship and 527 on innovation and a critical review of prior findings, the article identified only 17 and 13 dynamic process models, respectively. Six structurally comparable models covering both disciplines were selected for further analysis. Both disciplines’ dynamic process models can be structured into five harmonised stages, which can partly be divided into (sub)phases. The article’s primary contribution to the theory is systematically integrating process-based and design approaches in entrepreneurship and innovation. As a result, a streamlined and converged dynamic process model is developed, and the role of the process venue and the entrepreneur or innovator is discussed. As a practical implication, future directions for entrepreneurship and innovation educators, policymakers, and entrepreneurial/innovation ecosystem stakeholders are presented at the end of the article. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Nascent Innovative Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 498 KiB  
Article
From Start to Scale: Navigating Innovation, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, and Strategic Evolution
by Katja Crnogaj and Matej Rus
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(12), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120254 - 12 Dec 2023
Viewed by 2904
Abstract
In the contemporary business environment, startups have emerged as significant employment contributors, particularly in mature startup ecosystems, such as the United States. However, Europe, with a particular focus on Slovenia, represents an unexplored avenue in this area. As startups make the transition to [...] Read more.
In the contemporary business environment, startups have emerged as significant employment contributors, particularly in mature startup ecosystems, such as the United States. However, Europe, with a particular focus on Slovenia, represents an unexplored avenue in this area. As startups make the transition to scaleups, they face numerous challenges. Our study aims to comprehend the dynamics that affect startups during this crucial phase, focusing on the relationship between entrepreneurial motivations, the startup ecosystem, and their strategic adaptability. We undertook a primary survey among Slovenian startup and scaleup companies, and we utilized factor and regression analysis as the primary tools for conducting a thorough data analysis. The research underscores the symbiotic relationship between tailored business strategies, innovation, and growth challenges. To achieve successful transition from startup to scaleup, it is a strategic necessity for businesses to harness their innovative capacities. Our research pioneers the inclusion of Slovenia within the European startup landscape, providing insight into the unique challenges and opportunities inherent to the region. The findings advocate for a holistic approach in the startup ecosystem, reinforcing the significance of a multifaceted support system for these budding enterprises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Nascent Innovative Entrepreneurship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop