Next Article in Journal
Photophysics and Electrochemistry of Biomimetic Pyranoflavyliums: What Can Bioinspiration from Red Wines Offer
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure-Function-Environment Relationship of the Isomers Zeaxanthin and Lutein
Previous Article in Journal
Autofluorescence Spectroscopy and Imaging II: A Special Issue Aimed to Promote Optically Based Studies on Biological Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unravelling the Photoprotection Capacity of Resveratrol on Histidine Oxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Photoprotection

by
Michael Moustakas
Department of Botany, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Photochem 2022, 2(1), 5-8; https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010002
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 27 December 2021 / Published: 30 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species and Photoprotection)
Light energy, absorbed as photons by chlorophylls and other pigment molecules consisting of light-harvesting complexes (LHCs), is transferred to the reaction centres (RCs), where, through charge separation, electrons flow from photosystem II (PSII) through cytochrome b6f and diffusible electron carriers to photosystem I (PSI) [1,2,3]. This is a highly regulated process in which PSII and PSI work coordinately for an efficient electron transfer and are located in the photosynthetic membranes of chloroplasts (i.e., the thylakoids) [1,3,4,5]. The outcomes of light reactions are the formation of ATP and reducing power (reduced ferredoxin and NADPH) requiring coordination with the activity of metabolic processes for the synthesis of carbohydrates and other essential organic molecules [1,2,3,4]. Still, in the light reactions of photosynthesis, at both photosystems (PSII and PSI), reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion radical (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and singlet oxygen (1O2), are continuously produced at basal levels but are scavenged by different antioxidant mechanisms [6,7,8,9].
Under excess light conditions or other abiotic or biotic stresses, the overexcitation of PSII increases the probability of the formation of the triplet chlorophyll state (3Chl*) from the singlet excited states (1Chl*) through the intersystem crossing, producing single oxygen (1O2) [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Photoprotection mechanisms preventing ROS formation by downregulating 1Chl* through the process of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), by quenching 3Chl*, or by scavenging ROS are activated to prevent damage and improve fitness [6,7,15,16]. Constant overexcitation is neutralised by the long-term reduction in the PSII antenna’s size [17]. Thus, if the absorbed light energy exceeds that which can be used, this excess excitation energy must be quenched by the photoprotective mechanism of NPQ, so as to not damage the photosynthetic apparatus by the increased ROS production that can lead to oxidative stress [6,7,18,19,20,21].
ROS (e.g., O2, H2O2, OH, 1O2) are partially reduced or activated forms of atmospheric oxygen (O2) and, in plant cells, are constantly formed by the unavoidable leakage of electrons onto O2 from energy metabolism activities in chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes, in plasma membranes, or as by-products in the various metabolic pathways located in diverse cellular parts [22,23,24,25], with chloroplasts and peroxisomes rather than mitochondria being considered as the main ROS birthplaces in irradiated photosynthetic cells [26].
The hydroxyl radical (OH) reacts with almost all molecules, as it is the most reactive of all ROS and yet the shortest lived (half-life of 1 ns) [27]. Electron leakage to O2 at PSI results in O2 formation, which is shorter lived than H2O2, into which it rapidly converts [28]. The superoxide anion radical (O2) is also shorter lived than 1O2 but longer lived than OH, while H2O2 is the most stable and least reactive ROS with the longest lifetime, as it is able to easily diffuse through the membranes [28]. The global ROS levels in cells must be controlled and balanced, allowing only a basal ROS level to employ its beneficial function [24,29]. The efficient utilisation of sunlight photons for the production of energy-rich carbohydrates and other essential organic molecules must be accompanied by the harmless removal of unused photons that would otherwise transfer excitation energy to potentially toxic ROS [30].
Abiotic or biotic stress-induced ROS accumulation is scavenged by enzymatic antioxidants, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), guaiacol peroxidase (GOPX), glutathione-S- transferase (GST), and catalase (CAT), and non-enzymatic metabolites such as ascorbic acid, glutathione, a-tocopherol, carotenoids, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and proline [11,31,32].
ROS produced in chloroplasts generate oxidative stress, but also confer an important biological function (e.g., plant growth, development, and redox signalling) [23,25,28]. As the ROS formed by energy transfer (1O2) and electron transport (O2•−, H2O2) are produced simultaneously, it seems likely that the signalling pathways of one occasionally interfere with the signalling pathways of the other, therefore sometimes it may antagonize each other [5,9,11,25,33]. The role of chloroplast antioxidants, often having covering or interdepending functions, does not totally remove ROS but rather accomplishes a suitable balance between creation and deletion, so as to match the process of photosynthesis, allowing an effective scattering of signals to the nucleus [33,34,35]. Accordingly, ROS provide cells with tools to monitor electron transport and, thus, avoid over-reduction or over-oxidation and also create redox regulatory networks that enable plants to sense and react to biotic and abiotic stress conditions [34,36,37,38]. ROS activate the plant’s defence mechanisms in order to cope with oxidative stress, and are important signalling molecules for the regulation of a plethora of metabolic functions, accomplishing plant function and development [20,21,37,38,39,40]. Consequently, at the same time, as cells maintain high enough energy reserves to scavenge ROS, ROS are beneficial to both biotic and abiotic stresses, permitting them to regulate their metabolism and support a proper acclimation response [41,42,43,44]. There are more than 150 genes able to encode ROS-producing and ROS-detoxifying proteins in Arabidopsis cells consisting of the ROS gene network [29].
Environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, chilling, metal toxicity, and UV-B radiation, as well as pathogen attacks, lead to an enhanced generation of ROS in plants due to the disruption of cellular homeostasis [39,45]. During the last few decades, fluctuations in weather conditions have enormously affected rainfall patterns, influencing plant growth and development, eventually affecting crop yield and quality, as well as plant survival [39]. As a consequence of global climate change, the frequency, intensity, and duration of drought and high-temperature scenarios are increasing, resulting in reduced worldwide productivity [39]. Water deficit, among all environmental factors, has been characterised as one of the key hazards for the future of agriculture [39]. Under drought stress, as well as other environmental stresses, the absorbed light energy exceeds what can be used for photochemistry and, thus, an excess accumulation of ROS occurs able to damage the chloroplast, with photosystem II (PSII) being particularly exposed to damage [2,18,39,46].
Though ROS were initially believed to be toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism having to be scavenged to avoid the oxidative damage of cells, now it is widely accepted that ROS are used by most organisms as crucial signal transduction molecules [29]. It is well documented that a basal level of ROS is essential to sustain life [24,25]. Hence, the amount of ROS in cells needs to be retained [16].
The scenarios of global climate change demand a better understanding of the relationship between plant photochemistry and the role of ROS as signalling molecules for photoprotection, but also for generating oxidative stress under different environmental conditions. The elucidation of the mechanism in this interaction could help to enhance agricultural sustainability under global climate change.
In this Special Issue of Photochem, we expect to publish a collection of papers regarding recent advances in plant photochemistry, reactive oxygen species, and photoprotection.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, J.M. Changing concepts about the distribution of photosystems I and II between grana-appressed and stroma-exposed thylakoid membranes. Photosynth. Res. 2002, 73, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moustaka, J.; Ouzounidou, G.; Sperdouli, I.; Moustakas, M. Photosystem II is more sensitive than photosystem I to Al3+ induced phytotoxicity. Materials 2018, 11, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Moustakas, M.; Bayçu, G.; Sperdouli, I.; Eroğlu, H.; Eleftheriou, E.P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances photosynthesis in the medicinal herb Salvia fruticosa by improving photosystem II photochemistry. Plants 2020, 9, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mustárdy, L.; Garab, G. Granum revisited. A three-dimensional model-where things fall into place. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sperdouli, I.; Moustaka, J.; Antonoglou, O.; Adamakis, I.D.S.; Dendrinou-Samara, C.; Moustakas, M. Leaf age dependent effects of foliar-sprayed CuZn nanoparticles on photosynthetic efficiency and ROS generation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Materials 2019, 12, 2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Asada, K. The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: Scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 50, 601–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Moustaka, J.; Moustakas, M. Photoprotective mechanism of the non-target organism Arabidopsis thaliana to paraquat exposure. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 111, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moustaka, J.; Tanou, G.; Adamakis, I.D.; Eleftheriou, E.P.; Moustakas, M. Leaf age dependent photoprotective and antioxidative mechanisms to paraquat-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 13989–14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Müller, P.; Li, X.P.; Niyogi, K.K. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant. Physiol. 2001, 125, 1558–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Moustaka, J.; Tanou, G.; Giannakoula, A.; Panteris, E.; Eleftheriou, E.P.; Moustakas, M. Anthocyanin accumulation in poinsettia leaves and its functional role in photo-oxidative stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 175, 104065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kasajima, I.; Ebana, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Takahara, K.; Yano, M.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Uchimiya, H. Molecular distinction in genetic regulation of nonphotochemical quenching in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 13835–13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gawroński, P.; Witoń, D.; Vashutina, K.; Bederska, M.; Betliński, B.; Rusaczonek, A.; Karpiński, S. Mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 is a salicylic acid-independent regulator of growth but not of photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1151–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Melis, A. Photosystem-II damage and repair cycle in chloroplasts: What modulates the rate of photodamage? Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Niyogi, K.K. Safety valves for photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Bianchi, S.; Betterle, N.; Kouril, R.; Cazzaniga, S.; Boekema, E.; Bassi, R.; Dall’Osto, L. Arabidopsis mutants deleted in the light-harvesting protein Lhcb4 have a disrupted photosystem II macrostructure and are defective in photoprotection. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2659–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Anderson, J.M. Photoregulation of the composition, function and structure of thylakoid membranes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1986, 37, 93–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sperdouli, I.; Moustaka, J.; Ouzounidou, G.; Moustakas, M. Leaf age-dependent photosystem II photochemistry and oxidative stress responses to drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana are modulated by flavonoid accumulation. Molecules 2021, 26, 4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moustaka, J.; Meyling, N.V.; Hauser, T.P. Induction of a compensatory photosynthetic response mechanism in tomato leaves upon short time feeding by the chewing insect Spodoptera exigua. Insects 2021, 12, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sachdev, S.; Ansari, S.A.; Ansari, M.I.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: Generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox signaling in plants. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2087–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Inupakutika, M.A.; Sengupta, S.; Devireddy, A.R.; Azad, R.K.; Mittler, R. The evolution of reactive oxygen species metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5933–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mittler, R. ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Noctor, G.; Veljovic-Jovanovic, S.; Driscoll, S.; Novitskaya, L.; Foyer, C.H. Drought and oxidative load in the leaves of C3 plants: A predominant role for photorespiration? Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Phua, S.Y.; De Smet, B.; Remacle, C.; Chan, K.X.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species and organellar signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 5807–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Terrón-Camero, L.C.; Peláez-Vico, M.Á.; Molina-Moya, E.; Sandalio, L.M. An update on redox signals in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress crosstalk: Insights from cadmium and fungal pathogen interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 5857–5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Demmig-Adams, B.; Cohu, C.M.; Muller, O.; Adams II, W.W. Modulation of photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency in nature: From seconds to seasons. Photosynth. Res. 2012, 113, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1998, 49, 249–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adamakis, I.D.S.; Sperdouli, I.; Eleftheriou, E.P.; Moustakas, M. Hydrogen peroxide production by the spot-like mode action of bisphenol A. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Foyer, C.H. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 154, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sperdouli, I.; Andreadis, S.; Moustaka, J.; Panteris, E.; Tsaballa, A.; Moustakas, M. Changes in light energy utilization in photosystem II and reactive oxygen species generation in potato leaves by the pinworm Tuta absoluta. Molecules 2021, 26, 2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Suzuki, N.; Miller, G.; Tognetti, V.B.; Vandepoele, K.; Gollery, M.; Shulaev, V.; Van Breusegem, F. ROS signaling: The new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1866–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Sperdouli, I.; Mellidou, I.; Moustakas, M. Harnessing chlorophyll fluorescence for phenotyping analysis of wild and cultivated tomato for high photochemical efficiency under water deficit for climate change resilience. Climate 2021, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adamakis, I.D.S.; Malea, P.; Sperdouli, I.; Panteris, E.; Kokkinidi, D.; Moustakas, M. Evaluation of the spatiotemporal effects of bisphenol A on the leaves of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stamelou, M.L.; Sperdouli, I.; Pyrri, I.; Adamakis, I.D.S.; Moustakas, M. Hormetic responses of photosystem II in tomato to Botrytis cinerea. Plants 2021, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Sperdouli, I.; Hanć, A.; Dobrikova, A.; Apostolova, E.; Moustakas, M. Rapid hormetic responses of photosystem II photochemistry of clary sage to cadmium exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Moustaka, J.; Panteris, E.; Adamakis, I.D.S.; Tanou, G.; Giannakoula, A.; Eleftheriou, E.P.; Moustakas, M. High anthocyanin accumulation in poinsettia leaves is accompanied by thylakoid membrane unstacking, acting as a photoprotective mechanism, to prevent ROS formation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 154, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moustakas, M. The role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry and medicine. Materials 2021, 14, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zavafer, A.; Mancilla, C. Concepts of photochemical damage of Photosystem II and the role of excessive excitation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2021, 47, 100421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moustakas, M. Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Photoprotection. Photochem 2022, 2, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010002

AMA Style

Moustakas M. Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Photoprotection. Photochem. 2022; 2(1):5-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moustakas, Michael. 2022. "Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Photoprotection" Photochem 2, no. 1: 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem2010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop