Next Article in Journal
Smart Manufacturing in Timber Production
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Modified Kepok Banana (Musa acuminata × balbisiana) Starch Substitution on the Fat, Dietary Fiber, and Resistant Starch Content of Product Cookies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Effect of Heating Temperature on Indoor Photovoltaics †

Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Jl. Ahmad Yani, Sukoharjo 57162, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 7th Mechanical Engineering, Science and Technology International Conference, Surakarta, Indonesia, 21–22 December 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 63(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063008
Published: 27 February 2024

Abstract

:
The purpose of this research was to investigate the performance of photovoltaic modules when used in different heating temperatures. The heating temperature variants used were room T, TA = 50 °C, TB = 60 °C, and TC = 70 °C. The lamp capacity used was 5 watts with a bulb-type lamp. In addition, the circuit used was a series circuit. This research done on the effect of different temperatures of the heater placed under the photovoltaics showed that when there was an increase in the photovoltaic temperature, the voltage, current, power, and efficiency decreased. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the temperature used for photovoltaics.

1. Introduction

The utilization of solar energy as an environmentally friendly alternative energy source is increasingly in demand by many people. According to research, in the last decade, the level of solar energy usage in Indonesia has continued to increase, reaching 60% [1]. Along with the increasing need for energy, the utilization of solar energy is increasingly enhanced by optimizing the performance of solar panels. The process of converting solar energy into electrical energy is done with the help of photovoltaics (PVs) [2]. However, the disadvantage of photovoltaics is that they are unable to tolerate high temperatures [3]. If the photovoltaics are used at a high temperature, the resulting efficiency will decrease. Overheating caused by an excessive light source and high operating temperature are the main reasons for the low electrical efficiency of photovoltaics [4,5,6].
Other than this, the weather is an obstacle when using photovoltaics, which results in some circumstances that cause photovoltaics to not work optimally [7,8]. To reduce these problems, a tool was made for indoor photovoltaics, where the tool has a light source from the lamp. This makes the photovoltaics work optimally and stably.
Previous research was conducted by Shafa et al. [9] regarding the effect of light intensity and panel tilt on the convection rate coefficient of a solar water heater. From the results obtained, the higher the light intensity and panel tilt angle, the higher the output temperature. The slope of the panel is influential, namely, by increasing the temperature of the panel.
In addition, Jola et al. [1] researched the performance of series, parallel, and parallel–series relationships of solar panels. The results of the tests carried out show that an arrangement of solar panels with a series relationship is better if the aim is to produce a higher voltage. However, if the goal is to produce a higher current, then the arrangement of solar panels with a parallel relationship is better. In addition, a series–parallel relationship can be used as an alternative if you want to obtain a high enough voltage but with an adequate current.
Another study conducted by Mengata et al. [10] characterized solar photovoltaic modules powered by artificial light to be used as a source for smart sensors. The types of modules used were monocrystalline silicon and polycrystalline modules. Meanwhile, the types of lamps used were CFL, halogen, LED, and incandescent lamps with values of 100–2000 lx, which were evaluated with an uncertainty of ±(3% + 8) lx. The best performance was recorded for the m-Si PV4 module, which achieved a power of up to 555.83 µW/cm2 at 2000 lux under incandescent lamps. The lowest performance was recorded for the p-Si PV3 module under LED and CFL lamps, with a power density of only 0.16 µW/cm2 at 100 lux.
Based on the results of the research that was done, the purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of photovoltaic modules in indoor photovoltaic testing for different heating temperatures. The heating temperature variants used were room T, TA = 50 °C, TB = 60 °C, and TC = 70 °C. The lamp capacity used was 5 watts with a bulb. In addition, the circuit used was a series circuit. The outputs of this research were the photovoltaic temperature parameters, voltage, current, power, and efficiency.

2. Research Method

The photovoltaic testing was undertaken with an indoor system using a photovoltaic indoor test tool, as shown in Figure 1. The photovoltaic indoor test tool is a tool used to test photovoltaics in a closed room with lighting using lamp light intensity. This study aimed to investigate the effect of heating temperature on the photovoltaic performance.
The photovoltaic testing process began with the installation of the photovoltaics on the photovoltaic indoor test tool. Figure 2 is a schematic of the photovoltaic performance testing with the photovoltaic indoor test. The photovoltaics were arranged in order from bottom to top, including the heater, aluminum block, and two photovoltaic units arranged in series. In the photovoltaic indoor test tool, this research used a light bulb with a power of 5 watts. The parameters measured included the photovoltaic voltage, photovoltaic current, light intensity, and operating temperature of the photovoltaics. The photovoltaic temperature settings used in this study included room temperature conditions and heating temperatures around 50, 60, and 70 °C. The heating process was carried out by holding at temperatures of 50, 60, and 70 °C for 100 s.
During the testing process, the data logger was activated to collect data on the photovoltaic temperature, photovoltaic voltage, photovoltaic current, and light intensity. The photovoltaic heating used a 240 × 40 mm heating plate with 220 V, as shown in Figure 3. The heating plate was adjusted to the electrical capacity as needed using a dimmer to produce heating temperatures of 50, 60, and 70 °C. In the research results, the room temperature heating temperature is given as T room, as well as TA for 50 °C, TB for 60 °C, and TC for 70 °C.
This study used two photovoltaic units with a monocrystalline type. The two photovoltaic units were assembled in series, as shown in Figure 4. The size of one photovoltaic unit was 110 × 69 mm.
Data were collected using Arduino Uno to control the voltage and current sensors, temperature sensor, and light intensity sensor. The voltage and current sensors used were MAX 471, Kuongshun Electronic, Shenzhen, China. The temperature was measured using a thermocouple with a MAX 6675 sensor, Kuongshun Electronic. The light intensity sensor used a light intensity LDR. Data from these sensors were collected on an Arduino Uno data logger. The data collected on the Arduino was displayed on a serial monitor.
Photovoltaics can produce electrical energy from the conversion of light intensity in the photovoltaics. The light intensity causes the movement of electrons in the photovoltaics to produce a direct electric current. To find out the electrical power generated by PVs, we can use the following formula:
P = V × I
where P is the power produced by the photovoltaics, V is the voltage of the photovoltaics, and I is the electric current. The photovoltaic efficiency is the ratio between the power generated and the energy of the light intensity:
η = P I r · A × 100 %
where η is the photovoltaic efficiency, Ir is the light intensity, and A is the cross-sectional area.

3. Results and Discussion

The following presents the results of the tests that were carried out with the heating temperature variants: T room, TA, TB, and TC.
From Figure 5, the test results show that the highest voltage was found at the temperature T room, with a value of 1.760 V, while the lowest value was found at the heating temperature TC, with a value of 1.515 V.
The current graph in Figure 6 shows that the temperature T room produced the highest value of 1.095 A, while the lowest value was produced at heating temperature TC, amounting to 0.862 A.
The power graph in Figure 7 shows that the temperature T room produced the highest value of 1.929 W, while the lowest value was produced at heating temperature TC, with 1.317 W.
Figure 8 shows that the highest efficiency was found at the temperature T room, with 0.00012691%, while the lowest was at the TC heating temperature, with 0.0000902%.
From the results of the tests that were carried out, including voltage, current, power, and efficiency tests, all the results showed that the heating temperature T room produced the highest values, while the heating temperature TC produced the lowest values. This happened because temperature is very influential on photovoltaic efficiency. This agrees with research conducted by Dhassa et al. [4], which explained that an increase in the photovoltaic temperature causes a decrease in the efficiency of the current (A) and voltage (V) of the electrical output.

4. Conclusions

This research that was done on the effect of the temperature of the heater placed under the photovoltaics (room temperature, 50, 60, and 70 °C) showed that an increase in the temperature of the photovoltaics resulted in voltage, current, power, and efficiency decreases. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the temperature used for photovoltaics. In addition, a cooler can be used to reduce the temperature of the photovoltaics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; methodology, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; software, D.A.P. and W.K.; validation, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; formal analysis, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; investigation, D.A.P., A.I.S. and W.K.; resources, D.A.P., A.I.S. and W.K.; data curation, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.P.; writing—review and editing, D.A.P. and A.I.S.; visualization, D.A.P., A.I.S. and W.K.; supervision, D.A.P.; project administration, D.A.P.; funding acquisition, D.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful to Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta for financing this research under contract number 053/A.3-III/FT/I/2023 from the Tridharma Integration Grant Research plan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets in this article are not accessible to the public due to their involvement in current research. Requests for access for the datasets should be sent to the the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Humaira, J.D. Comparative Performance of Series, Parallel, and Series Parallel Relationships in Solar Panels. MSI Trans. Edu. 2023, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Widodo Besar Riyadi, T.; Effendy, M.; Radiant Utomo, B.; Tri Wijayanta, A. Performance of a photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator panel in combination with various solar tracking systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 235, 121336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dubey, S.; Sarvaiya, J.N.; Seshadri, B. Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world—A review. Energy Procedia 2013, 33, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dhassa, A.D.; Natarajana, E.; Lakshmi, P. An investigation of temperature effects on solar photovoltaic cells and modules. Int. J. Eng. Trans. B Appl. 2014, 27, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Dousari, A.; Al-Nassar, W.; Ahmed, M. Photovoltaic and wind energy: Challenges and solutions in desert regions. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 166, 04003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Utomo, B.R.; Sulistyanto, A.; Riyadi, T.W.B.; Wijayanta, A.T. Enhanced Performance of Combined Photovoltaic–Thermoelectric Generator and Heat Sink Panels with a Dual-Axis Tracking System. Energies 2023, 16, 2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hosenuzzaman, M.; Rahim, N.A.; Selvaraj, J.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Malek, A.B.M.A.; Nahar, A. Global prospects, progress, policies, and environmental impact of solar photovoltaic power generation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khairuddin, M.; Nugrahanto, L.K.I. Investigation of The Effect of Correlated Colour Temperature on Dssc Performance for Indoor Solar Cell Systems. JT J. Teknik 2021, 10, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Salsabila, S.; Yunanto, I. Effect of Light Intensity and Panel Tilt on the Convection Rate Coefficient of Solar Water Heater. J. Pendidik. Tambusai 2023, 7, 21361–21366. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mengounou Mengata, G.; Ngoffe Perabi, S.; Ndi, F.E.; Wiysahnyuy, Y.S. Characterization of solar photovoltaic modules powered by artificial light for use as a source for smart sensors. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 12105–12116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Indoor photovoltaic test tool.
Figure 1. Indoor photovoltaic test tool.
Engproc 63 00008 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of indoor photovoltaic test; (b) real test.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of indoor photovoltaic test; (b) real test.
Engproc 63 00008 g002
Figure 3. (a) Aluminum block; (b) heater.
Figure 3. (a) Aluminum block; (b) heater.
Engproc 63 00008 g003
Figure 4. (a) Real test; (b) schematic of indoor photovoltaic test.
Figure 4. (a) Real test; (b) schematic of indoor photovoltaic test.
Engproc 63 00008 g004
Figure 5. Voltage against time graph.
Figure 5. Voltage against time graph.
Engproc 63 00008 g005
Figure 6. Current against time graph.
Figure 6. Current against time graph.
Engproc 63 00008 g006
Figure 7. Power against time graph.
Figure 7. Power against time graph.
Engproc 63 00008 g007
Figure 8. Efficiency against time graph.
Figure 8. Efficiency against time graph.
Engproc 63 00008 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pratiwi, D.A.; Soumi, A.I.; Kurniawan, W. Effect of Heating Temperature on Indoor Photovoltaics. Eng. Proc. 2024, 63, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063008

AMA Style

Pratiwi DA, Soumi AI, Kurniawan W. Effect of Heating Temperature on Indoor Photovoltaics. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 63(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pratiwi, Dessy Ade, Andi Ibrahim Soumi, and Wafiq Kurniawan. 2024. "Effect of Heating Temperature on Indoor Photovoltaics" Engineering Proceedings 63, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop