Next Article in Journal
Fiber Laser Cutting of AISI 431 Martensitic Stainless Steel: An Experimental Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Assembly of Fine-Pitch Package Integrated Circuits in a Laminated Transfer Process for E-Textile Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Fundamental Study on Influence of Independent Factors on Response Variable Using Response Surface Methodology and Taguchi Method †

by
Venkatesan Kamalakannan
1,*,
Srinivasan Rajaram
1,
Jenish Iyyadurai
2 and
Felix Sahayaraj Arockiasamy
3
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Valliammai Engineering College, Kancheepuram 603203, India
2
Department of Applied Mechanics, Seenu Atoll School, Hulhudhoo-Meedhoo, Addu City 10901, Maldives
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641402, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Processing and Performance of Materials, Chennai, India, 2–3 March 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 61(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061037
Published: 6 February 2024

Abstract

:
Optimization approaches provide a strong foundation for analyzing and forecasting actions within a selected domain. This approach may be used to assess the extent of the effect of input variables on responses. There are several optimization tools and methodologies available, but each has its numerical approach and degree of accuracy with experimental data. As a result, several optimization methods are constantly evolving, and many new studies have focused on them. This study analyzes new optimization approaches employed to handle the issue of the location and size of distributed generating units for diverse applications, particularly focusing on tribological aspects. In addition, this work examines the modern technological, technical, economic, and regulatory factors that have created interest in distributed generation integration, as well as an overview of the challenges that must be overcome. Finally, it evaluates all relevant strategies for integrating dispersed generation from renewable energy sources using optimization techniques. The main methods of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and the Taguchi optimization technique were chosen because they have been used in many technical investigations and provide more significant predictions.

1. Introduction

Many studies have many numbers of variables; arranging all of the variables in a logical order is difficult, costly, and requires more experiments. All of these issues can be solved using optimization approaches. The majority of optimization algorithms take side constraints into account independently from equality and inequality constraints. Direct implementation of the algorithm can efficiently handle side restrictions. None of the side constraints will ever be violated by a good algorithm. There are no equality or inequality constraints in an unconstrained optimization problem, but there may be side constraints. The optimization problems are with or without side constraints. However, in the constrained optimization problem, it has one or more equality and/or inequality constraints. The Taguchi L9 orthogonal array was used by Jenish et al. [1] to forecast the optimal parameters and influence level on the dry sand three-body abrasive wear behavior of CQSF/epoxy with and without red mud and CSA particulate-filled composites. Four input parameters were employed in this investigation at three levels. The main input parameters were velocities, abrading distance, load against wear, and filler content. As a reaction, a certain wear rate was employed (output parameter). The coded factors were +1, 0, and +1, and the Minitab software 19.2.0 output an L9 (43) design table with 9 runs. CCD-RSM was used to investigate the two-body sliding wear behavior of CQSF/epoxy with and without red mud and CSA particulate-filled composites in this work [2]. The abrasive wear behavior of CQSF/epoxy with and without red mud and CSA particulate-filled composites was studied using the Taguchi optimization technique. Although fiber hybridization is the most effective strategy for improving performance, behavioral studies are difficult to analyze due to the large number of factors [3,4,5]. The characteristic study of polymeric materials has improved significantly recently due to the requirements of such materials, but analytical investigations of the parameters are still common due to a lack of understanding of the optimization technique; if it is understood, the number of experiments can be reduced and proper interpretation of results can be achieved for all the input variables [6]. In polymer composites, every individual input parameter has an impact on the output response, and additionally, the mechanical behavior comprises many input variables, such as filler percentage, fiber percentage, fiber length, and the type of polymer [7,8]. Polymer composites have abundant variables which affect the results [9,10,11,12,13]. These variables are difficult to investigate using conventional methods [14,15,16,17]. In order to overcome this issue, polymer composites’ characterizations can potentially be evaluated with many techniques to identify the behavior of the composites [18,19].
Using a recent highly referenced work for this research, a solid understanding of the optimization technique and methods of analysis contained in the optimization process is achieved. This paper provides an overview of the background and relevance of response surface methodology (RSM) and the Taguchi method in the context of investigating the influence of independent factors on a response variable. While these methodologies have been extensively utilized in various fields, there remains a need for a comprehensive study that systematically compares and evaluates their effectiveness in real-world applications. Additionally, this study aims to address the knowledge gap by highlighting the advantages and limitations of both RSM and the Taguchi method, offering insights into when and how these techniques can be optimally employed.

2. Techniques for Optimization

To analyze the input and output parameters of experimental results, optimization techniques are widely used. Within the boundary conditions, the input parameter must be chosen. The independent or input parameter is a parameter that can be changed within the domain. The response or output parameter refers to the experiment’s result. Different optimization strategies may be used to optimize for lowest or maximum responsiveness. For the experimental design table, an ANOVA table is usually prepared. The accuracy of the model is investigated using regression mean square and modified regression mean square. If the p-value is less than 0.05, the model is significant.

2.1. Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

The influence level of different input variables on output responses can be investigated using RSM. The invention of this statistical method took place in 1951 by George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson. The optimum level of all the responses can be identified using the principle of this unique method. The most preferable equation to execute this technique was recommended by Box and Wilson to be second-order polynomial expression. Regarding the execution of prediction only for the data, which must be within the boundary levels and criteria, if the data go beyond the limit, the prediction would have considerable residual values. Statistical tools, as opposed to conventional methodologies, can analyze the connection between process variables.
In a tribological investigation, there are uncontrolled factors; namely, sliding velocity, load, sliding distance, and filler are considered input parameters, which have been labeled A, B, C, and D for both responses [6]. Equations (1) and (2) [6] show how RSM framed the second-order polynomial equation to mention the response surface ‘Y’ for the selected input parameters.
Y = b0 + Ʃbixi + Ʃbiixi2 + Ʃbijxixj + er
SWR or CoF = b0 + b1(A) + b2(B) + b3(C) + b4(D) + b11(A2) + b22(B2)
+ b33(C2) + b44(D2) + b12(AB) + b13(AC) + b14(AD) + b23(BC)
+ b24(BD) + b34(CD)
where b0 is the average value of the responses; b1, b2, b3, and b4 are the coefficients of the linear effects of the individual parameters; b11,b22,b33, and b44 are the coefficients of interaction effects of the same parameter; and b12, b13,b14,b23,b24, and b34 are the coefficients of the interaction effects of the parameters.

2.2. Taguchi Method

The Taguchi orthogonal array was invented by Dr. Taguchi of Japan as an optimization method for a minimum variable. This method is accurate and well balanced. The Taguchi method’s effectiveness is boosted by the Design of Experiments’ collaboration with it. Furthermore, the investigation of the impact of input factors and their interactions on the output parameter yields more similar results. The best input parameters are found by using criteria like “smaller–the–better”, “bigger–the–better”, and “normal–the–better” for the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) table condition.
Jenish et al. [20] used the RSM regression model to determine the optimal parameters of sliding wear behavior of CQSF/epoxy with and without red mud, as well as CSA particulate-filled composites. The CCD technique was utilized to create a design table in the “Design of Expert” program in this empirical statistical RSM. Loads (10, 20, and 30 N), sliding lengths (500, 1000, and 1500 m), sliding velocities (2, 3, and 4 m/s), and fillers (0, 5, and 10 wt. percent) were utilized as input parameters with three different levels. The coefficient of friction (CoF) and wear rate were calculated based on the results of 30 runs. +1, 0 and −1 were the coded factors.
To perform the analysis using traditional complete factorial approaches, 64 (43) experiments were required. To predict the optimum parameters among three categories of quality characteristics, the “lower-the-better” condition was chosen [21].
S N = 10 × log 1 n ( S W R ) 2
where SWR represents the specific wear rate of the sample, and n represents the total number of experiments. The influence level of each parameter is identified from Equations (4)–(7).
Step: 1
Calculation of S/N ratio.
Step: 2
Computation of overall mean of the S/N ratio. The overall mean can be calculated from this step.
S ¯ N = 1 9 i = 1 9 S N i
Step: 3
Computation of the sum of squares. The sum of squares represents the square of the difference in the mean average of S/N, and the S/N ratio can be calculated from this step.
φ = i = 9 9 S N i S ¯ N 2
Step: 4
Computation of the ith process parameter. The sum of squares of the ith parameter due to variation about the mean can be calculated from this step.
φ i = j = 1 4 S N i j S ¯ N 2
Step: 5
Computation of the ith parameter’s “percentage of contribution”. In the final step, the percentage of contribution of each process parameter can be calculated.
Percentage   of   contribution ,   P i = φ i φ × 100
The optimum response for “lower-the-better” with all the process parameters is given in Equation (8). The average S/N ratio for the recommended condition is computed using this equation. Then, the SWR is calculated by substituting the S/N ratio in the “lower-the-better” condition.
S = H + A p H + B q H + C r H + ( D s H )
where S is the predicted average S/N ratio for SWR, H is the overall experimental mean of the S/N ratio, and Ap, Bq, Cr, and Ds are the S/N ratio values for the recommended level of the process parameters. Selecting variables and orthogonal arrays are important processes in the Taguchi technique. Once all the processes are over, the software provides the necessary solution for the model. The result could be a regression equation, contour plot, or the influence of the input parameter.

3. Studies on Response Surface Methodology

The behavior of iron mud filler particulate filled with glass fiber/epoxy composite was analyzed using response surface methodology. For response surface analysis, the sliding distance, sliding velocity, and iron mud filler content were considered independent variables. An ANOVA was used for all the optimization techniques in order to obtain the numerical significance and percentage contribution. The response surface approach was used to find the best settings for the lowest SWR. The best values were 20 percent iron mud content, a 35 N weight, a 50 m sliding distance, and a 100 cm/s sliding velocity under experimental conditions. With a desirability value of 1, the SWR for this optimum condition was 0.0056591 mm3/N-m. The observed error percentage ranged from 0 to 10%, as determined by a comparison table of the observed and predicted responses.
Using the RSM prediction tool, Parikh and Gohil [22] investigated the sliding wear of cotton fiber-reinforced polymer composites with SiC filler. The percentage of response contribution was calculated. When comparing 3 wt. percent SiC filler composites to 5 wt. percent SiC filler composites, the researchers discovered that 5 wt. percent SiC filler increased wear resistance. Under high load conditions, the 3 wt. percent SiC filler composite had a lower wear rate. The tribological behavior of natural and synthetic fiber-reinforced polymer with and without filler composite has been studied extensively. Many papers have concluded from the study’s findings that speed and load distance are the major controlling parameters for wear, and that adding filler reduces wear.
Babu et al. [23] used RSM to forecast the surface roughness of turned nano-Khorasan-based pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced polyester composites. The F-value from the ANOVA table in this study is 21.37. This indicates that the analytical model performs well. The presence of p-values less than 0.05 for the specified parameters indicates that they are highly significant.
Rajmohan and Palanikumar [24] used RSM under CCD to perform parametric research. CCD is better for creating mathematical models that anticipate output reactions like thrust force, surface roughness, and burr height. The impact of the input parameters and their interactions were addressed, and the RSM model was used to identify the expected control variables. If the p-value was less than 0.05 in the ANOVA table, the parameter was considered insignificant. All unimportant parameters were removed from the ANOVA table and predicted equation in order to obtain a better result. Because the experimental and predicted values were so similar, the model was more useful for analysis.
Sharma et al. [25] experimented with the sliding wear characteristics of Al6082 alloy composites filled with graphite. The experiment was performed using a pin-on-disc wear tester, and the parametric analysis of wear was analyzed via RSM. The design table for statistical analysis was prepared using the CCD approach. Percentage reinforcement, load, sliding speed value, and sliding distance were the input parameters for the analysis. The R2 and adjusted R2 rates were both above 95%. Because the input and output parameters were clearly important, the regression model was more trustworthy for parameter analysis. The p-value in the ANOVA table was less than 0.05, indicating that the model was 95 percent confident.

3.1. Regression Line from RSM

The regression equation summarizes the linear correlation between the obtained and analytical data, and the significance of each datapoint is also determined. The accuracy level of the responses, such as particular wear rate and CoF, are discussed based on the regression line, which was obtained using a normal plot of residuals from the design expert-13 software [2]. Residuals emphasize the discrepancy between the observed and expected values. It is revealed that the residuals decrease close to the accuracy line. All the typically framed values are nullified through this process.

3.2. Description of Surface Plot from RSM

Figure 1 depicts the 3D surface plot of the specific wear rate (SWR) for various input parameters and variations in filler content, indicating the optimal condition for SWR with regard to filler content. For all studies, the SWR ranges from 0.000114 to 0.000931 mm3/Nm.
Figure 1a depicts the differences in SWR with regard to filler content and their corresponding load when the sliding velocity is 3 m/s and the sliding distance variable is 1000 m. The value of the filler content exhibits a negative link with SWR up to 5 wt. percent filler addition, and thereafter, the wear rate increases with filler content due to filler particle debonding. Similarly, the variation in SWR with regard to load is minimal throughout the testing. The filler material percentages are 4% to 6% by weight, and the wear rate is at its lowest.
Figure 1b denotes the SWR variation with regard to the corresponding filler substances and concerns sliding distance when the particular sliding velocity and corresponding load on the pin are 3 m/s and 20 N, respectively. The SWR drops with increasing wt. percent of filler addition up to 5 wt. percent, and then, reverses its behavior with an increase in SWR. The variation in wear rate with regard to sliding distance proves minimal up to 1000 m, and it exhibits a linear trend beyond that. It should be noted that the SWR variation with regard to filler content is minimal in the range of 4 wt. percent to 6 wt. percent for sliding distances ranging from 500 m to 1000 m.
Figure 1c illustrates the SWR values with regard to certain filler substances and concerns sliding velocity, while the applied load on the disc and the sliding distance is 20 N and 1000 m, respectively. The wear rate variation exhibits an initial negative slope with regard to filler content up to 5 wt. percent, and then, the slope reverses due to increased wear losses. The effect of sliding velocity on SWR is nearly consistent throughout the test, with the velocity ranging from 2 m/s to 4 m/s. The optimization plot confirms that the best red mud filler content to lower the SWR was between 4% and 6% by weight.

4. Studies on the Taguchi Method

Using an ASTM standard G99 [2] pin-on-disc machine, Prabhu et al. [26] examined the wear characteristics of glass fiber/epoxy filled with CSP composites. In a signal-to-noise ratio analysis, the amount of time saved from the investigation was admirable. The signal-to-noise ratio can forecast the outcomes inside the domain and suggest the best parameter. The inclusion of coconut shell powder in epoxy resin augmented the wear resistance of the composite materials, according to the findings. The mechanical characteristics were also enhanced by the presence of CSP.
The abrasive wear of fiber/epoxy composites was analyzed and the surface behavior was improved by Swain and Biswas [27]. The trials were carried out using the ASTM-G65 three-body rubber wheel abrasive wear test. In the Minitab software, Taguchi’s orthogonal array was used for this study. The important input parameters used for the investigation were a distance of 70 m, fiber content of 30 wt.%, a load of 10 N, and an abrasive size of 200 mm. These parameters were analyzed from the S/N ratio table under the “lower-the-best” condition and offered a superior SWR.

Taguchi Interpretation

The S/N ratio under lower-the-better conditions was selected and the optimum input parameters were evaluated by Jenish et al. [1]. All the input parameters (velocity, load, filler, and distance) were used for the experiment. The method employed for these experiments was three-body abrasive wear test. The plot showed the optimum parameters at all the upper peaks. The interaction between each parameter for this study was also determined, as shown in Figure 2. The interaction effect of SWR was assessed by looking the peak of the line and the movement of the line. All the mean values were used to complete this interaction plot. For the most significant level in the finite element analysis, even these techniques provide a better solution [28]. Polymer composites represent a widely growing sector, which means the use of this optimization is highly recommended for all sectors. Mechanical characterization is common for polymer composites [29,30]. However, driving experiments with minimum data may not give a clear and complete picture of the performance of the materials. So, optimization is highly recommended to analyze more data and to obtain significant reports.

5. Conclusions

By choosing acceptable input components, the response surface approach and Taguchi orthogonal array are more suited for predicting the experiment’s output response. This article illustrates why optimization approaches are needed for efficient parameter integration, particularly for input and output variables. It describes the worldwide setting that aided the development of regression analysis, as well as the decentralization of generating units through methodologies. The exponential growth in research publications utilizing optimization strategies to handle variable placement and size problems demonstrates the high interest in this area among all traditional methods. This article provides an overview of current research on the use of various optimization approaches to determine the optimum position and magnitude of variables in analyses for this issue. It outlines and analyzes the many traditional and optimization strategies used to solve this issue, taking into account their key benefits and drawbacks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.K. and S.R.; investigation and writing-original preparation, V.K. and S.R.; analysis and project administration, J.I. and F.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iyyadurai, J.; Chinnasamy, V.; Gandhi, S.; Rajeshkumar, G. Sustainable Development of Cissus Quadrangularis Stem Fiber/epoxy Composite on Abrasive Wear Rate Sustainable Development of Cissus Quadrangularis Stem Fiber/epoxy Composite on Abrasive Wear Rate. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 19, 9283–9295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jenish, I.; Gandhi, V.C.S.; Raj, R.E.; Basavarajappa, S.; Indran, S.; Divya, D.; Kumaravelan, R. A New Study on Tribological Performance of Cissus Quadrangularis Stem Fiber/Epoxy with Red Mud Filler Composite. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 19, 3502–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Panda, P.K.; Jebastine, J.; Ramarao, M.; Fairooz, S.; Reddy, C.K.; Nasif, O.; Alfarraj, S.; Manikandan, V.; Jenish, I. Exploration on Mechanical Behaviours of Hyacinth Fibre Particles Reinforced Polymer Matrix-Based Hybrid Composites for Electronic Applications. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 4933450. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenish, I.; Sahayaraj, A.F.; Suresh, V.; Mani Raj, J.; Appadurai, M.; Raj, E.F.I.; Nasif, O.; Alfarraj, S.; Kumaravel, A.K. Analysis of the Hybrid of Mudar/Snake Grass Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy with Nano-Silica Filler Composite for Structural Application. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 7805146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ganesamoorthy, R.; Reddy, R.M.; Raja, T.; Panda, P.K.; Dhoria, S.H.; Nasif, O.; Alfarraj, S.; Manikandan, V.; Jenish, I. Studies on Mechanical Properties of Kevlar/Napier Grass Fibers Reinforced with Polymer Matrix Hybrid Composite. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6907631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Radhika, N.; Raghu, R. Prediction of mechanical properties and modeling on sliding wear behavior of LM25/TiC composite using response surface methodology. Part. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vigneshwaran, G.V.; Jenish, I.; Sivasubramanian, R. Design, Fabrication and Experimental Analysis of Pandanus Fibre Reinforced Polyester Composite. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 984, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stalin, J.R.P.; Jenish, I.; Indran, S. Tribological charecterization of Carbon Epoxy Composite materials with particulate silane treated SiC fillers. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 984–985, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maniraj, J.; Arockiasamy, F.S.; Kumar, C.R.; Kumar, D.A.; Jenish, I.; Suyambulingam, I.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S. Machine Learning Techniques for the Design and Optimization of Polymer Composites: A Review. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 428, 02013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sahayaraj, A.F.; Dhamotharan, S.; Sandeep, D.; Ramachandran, P.; Jenish, I.; Divakaran, D.; Suyambulingam, I.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S. Sustainable Smart Polymer Composite Materials: A Comprehensive Review. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 428, 02014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rajaram, S.; Venkatesan, K.; Jenish, I.; Bhaskar, G.B. Study of mechanical properties on abaca/sisal fibre–reinforced epoxy resin–based hybrid composites. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023. [CrossRef]
  12. Gokulkumar, S.; Suyambulingam, I.; Divakaran, D.; Priyadharshini, G.S.; Aravindh, M.; Iyyadurai, J.; Edwards, M.S.; Siengchin, S. Facile exfoliation and physicochemical characterization of biomass-based cellulose derived from Lantana aculeata leaves for sustainable environment. Macromol. Res. 2023, 31, 1163–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suyambulingam, I.; Gangadhar, L.; Sana, S.S.; Divakaran, D.; Siengchin, S.; Kurup, L.A.; Iyyadurai, J.; Albert Bernad Noble, K.E. Chitosan Biopolymer and Its Nanocomposites: Emerging Material as Adsorbent in Wastewater Treatment. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 2023, 9387016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Venugopal, J.; Dhanasakkaravarthi, B.; Surakasi, R.; Rinawa, M.L.; Manjunatha, L.H.; Alshgari, R.A.; Wabaidur, S.M.; Islam, M.A.; Jenish, I. Effect on Compression Molding Parameters in Mechanical Properties of MWCNT/Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2022, 2022, 9295407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iyyadurai, J.; Arockiasamy, F.S.; Manickam, T.S.; Suyambulingam, I.; Siengchin, S.; Appadurai, M.; Raj, E. Revolutionizing Polymer Composites: Boosting Mechanical Strength, Thermal Stability, Water Resistance, and Sound Absorption of Cissus Quadrangularis Stem Fibers with Nano Silica. Silicon 2023, 15, 6407–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Premkumar, R.; Sathish Kumar, K.; Maniraj, J.; Jenish, I.; Hussain, F.; Khedher, N.B.; Aich, W.; Suresh, V. Experimental studies on mechanical and thermal properties of polyester hybrid composites reinforced with Sansevieria trifasciata fibers. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8604234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Felix Sahayaraj, A.; Muthukrishnan, M.; Jenish, I. Extraction and Characterization of Sponge Gourd Outer Skin Fiber. J. Nat. Fibers 2023, 20, 2208888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sahayaraj, A.F.; Selvan, M.T.; Jenish, I.; Ramesh, M. Extraction and characterization of novel cellulosic fiber from Jatropha integerrima plant stem for potential reinforcement in polymer composites. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023. [CrossRef]
  19. Ramesh, M.; Tamil Selvan, M.; Felix Sahayaraj, A.; Jenish, I.; Balakrishnan, P.; Ravanan, A. Investigation of mechanical and viscoelastic properties of Agave cantala fiber-reinforced green composites for structural applications. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2023. [CrossRef]
  20. Jenish, I.; Chinnasamy, S.G.V.; Basavarajappa, S.; Indran, S.; Divya, D.; Liu, Y.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S. Tribo-Mechanical characterization of carbonized coconut shell micro particle reinforced with Cissus quadrangularis stem fiber/epoxy novel composite for structural application. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 19, 2963–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, T.; Patnaik, A.; Chauhan, R.; Chauhan, P.; Kumar, N. Physico-mechanical and tribological properties of nanoclay filled friction composite materials using Taguchi design of experiment approach. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 1575–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Parikh, H.H.; Gohil, P.P.; Husk, R. ScienceDirect Sliding Wear Experimental Investigation and Prediction Using Response Surface Method: Fillers Filled Fiber Reinforced Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 5388–5393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Babu, G.D.; Babu, B.J.; Sumanth, K.B.; Babu, K.S. Materials Today: Proceedings Experimental investigation on surface roughness of turned Nano-Khorasan based pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced polymer composites using response surface methodology. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 27, 2213–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajmohan, T.; Palanikumar, K. Application of the central composite design in optimization of machining parameters in drilling hybrid metal matrix composites. Measurement 2013, 46, 1470–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sharma, P.; Khanduja, D.; Sharma, S. Dry sliding wear investigation of Al6082/Gr metal matrix composites by response surface methodology. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2016, 5, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prabhu, R.; Rahul, M.P.; Aeilias, A.; Sunny, B.; Alok, J.; Bhat, T. Investigation of Tribological Property of Coconut Shell Powder Filled Epoxy Glass Composites. Am. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 7, 174–184. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mishra, V.; Biswas, S. Three-body abrasive wear behavior of short jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raj, E.; Appadurai, M.; Rani, E.; Jenish, I. Finite-element design and analysis of switched reluctance motor for automobile applications. Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 2022, 5, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Iyyadurai, J.; Arockiasamy, F.S.; Manickam, T.; Rajaram, S.; Suyambulingam, I.; Siengchin, S. Experimental Investigation on Mechanical, Thermal, Viscoelastic, Water Absorption, and Biodegradability Behavior of Sansevieria Ehrenbergii Fiber Reinforced Novel Polymeric Composite with the Addition of Coconut Shell Ash Powder. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2023, 33, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manickam, T.; Iyyadurai, J.; Jaganathan, M.; Babuchellam, A.; Mayakrishnan, M.; Arockiasamy, F.S. Effect of stacking sequence on mechanical, water absorption, and biodegradable properties of novel hybrid composites for structural applications. Int. Polym. Process. 2022, 38, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Contour plots of (a) Filler—load influence on SWR, (b) Filler—sliding distance influence on SWR, and (c) Filler—sliding velocity influence on SWR [2].
Figure 1. Contour plots of (a) Filler—load influence on SWR, (b) Filler—sliding distance influence on SWR, and (c) Filler—sliding velocity influence on SWR [2].
Engproc 61 00037 g001
Figure 2. Signal-to-noise ratio [1].
Figure 2. Signal-to-noise ratio [1].
Engproc 61 00037 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamalakannan, V.; Rajaram, S.; Iyyadurai, J.; Arockiasamy, F.S. Fundamental Study on Influence of Independent Factors on Response Variable Using Response Surface Methodology and Taguchi Method. Eng. Proc. 2024, 61, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061037

AMA Style

Kamalakannan V, Rajaram S, Iyyadurai J, Arockiasamy FS. Fundamental Study on Influence of Independent Factors on Response Variable Using Response Surface Methodology and Taguchi Method. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 61(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamalakannan, Venkatesan, Srinivasan Rajaram, Jenish Iyyadurai, and Felix Sahayaraj Arockiasamy. 2024. "Fundamental Study on Influence of Independent Factors on Response Variable Using Response Surface Methodology and Taguchi Method" Engineering Proceedings 61, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop