Next Article in Journal
Novel Natural Bee Brick with a Low Energy Footprint for “Green” Masonry Walls: Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Research on INS/GNSS/UWB Adaptive Robust ESKF Kinematic and Static Filtering Based on Cost Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A New Approach to the Preparation of Inclusion Complexes with Cyclodextrins: Studying Their Stability Using Molecular Dynamics Methods †

by
Pavel Y. Andreev
1,
Ekaterina S. Barteneva
2,*,
Elena V. Grekhneva
2,
Kirill S. Efanov
3 and
Kirill A. Breskin
2
1
Department of Oncology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Voronezh 394036, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Kursk State University, Kursk 305000, Russia
3
Department of Thermophysics, Institute of Nuclear Physics and Technology, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Kashirskoe Highway 31, Moscow 115409, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 245; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15817
Published: 2 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
One of the key characteristics of pharmaceutical substances is their solubility in pharmaceutically relevant media. This characteristic reflects the quality of the drug and the rate at which the pharmaceutical substance is released from its dosage form. Reduced efficacy and difficulties in the medical use of pharmaceutical substances are often associated with their low solubility in aqueous solutions. It is worth noting that about 40% of pharmaceuticals are practically insoluble, given that 85% are intended for oral administration, which is the simplest and most convenient form. The encapsulation of drug substances can solve this problem. The modern pharmaceutical industry uses molecular containers such as cyclodextrins for this purpose. The incorporation of the target component occurs on a host–guest basis and is driven by weak intermolecular interactions, the nature of which is not yet fully understood. Encapsulation has been shown to promote stability during storage, improve palatability, enhance pharmacological activity and bioavailability, reduce side effects, and, most importantly, increase the solubility of these substances. Our study presents the synthesis of the nimesulide inclusion complex in β-, γ-cyclodextrin cavity. The experimental results were confirmed using TLC, HPLC, UV- and IR spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis. The theoretical justification of the stability of the β-cyclodextrin/nimesulide complex was performed via one of the most innovative methods, the molecular dynamics method, using NAMD V2.14 and Gaussian 09W software with a simulation step of 2 femtoseconds and a duration of 5 nanoseconds. A modified CHARMM36 force field was used as the MD force field. The ability to enhance drug solubility and maintain drug stability is a promising area in the field of pharmaceutical chemistry.

1. Introduction

Nimesulide is a non-steroid anti-inflammatory agent that promotes selective COX2 (cyclooxygenase-2) inhibition; however, it does not affect other isozymes, such as COX1 (cyclooxygenase-1), thereby reducing the risk of ulceration and gastrointestinal bleeding and exhibiting a more favorable safety profile [1,2]. Nimesulide was suggested as a multifactorial approach to inflammation; thus, it serves as a promising therapeutic agent in the management and treatment of a large spectrum of pathologic conditions associated with acute pain [3]. Since it was first authorized and launched in Italian healthcare in 1985 [4,5] as a drug with potent analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic properties, the indications of the application of nimesulide were expanded. In recent decades, several in vitro investigations, accompanied by animal models, provided insights into the promising impact of nimesulide in such pathologic conditions as dry eye syndrome (DES) and malignant tumors via carrier-mediated drug delivery. It is widely known that drug delivery systems (DDSs) are used in order to provide a proper site for drug release, to enhance the bioavailability of a therapeutic agent, to keep it stable, etc. [6]. Several DDSs were developed and suggested as carriers of nimesulide. Among them, niosomely entrapped nimesulide, the success of which was confirmed by both in vivo and in vitro studies due to the percentage of edema inhibition. These investigations shed light on the ability of a noisome-based transdermal drug delivery system of nimesulide to effectively inhibit fluid retention in rodent animal models and ex mortem studies of human cadaver skin (HCS) [7]. Another delivery system of hyaluronic acid, conjugated with nimesulide (HA-NIM) in the form of eye drops, was studied for its anti-inflammatory effect in the benzalkonium chloride-induced experimental dry eye rabbit model. Chen TY and coworkers have developed a rabbit model of dry eye—a severe condition that is a characteristic sign of primary and secondary Sjögren syndrome, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis and numerous other autoimmune and non-autoimmune abnormalities [8,9]. The raw 264.7line, which is the derivate of monocyte/macrophage-like cells [10], was exposed to hyaluronic acid-nimesulide conjugates and was evaluated for several biomarkers representing inflammation. Raw 264.7 is the eukaryotic cell line, which originated from BALB/c male mice with a tumor induced by Abelson leukemia virus. Raw 264.7 cells have been widely used as a myeloid cellular model for several decades. A significant reduction in nitric oxide biosynthesis was observed after the cell culture was treated using nimesulide conjugated with hyaluronic acid, as well as IL-6 and TNF-α, which were considerably decreased. The therapeutic effects of HA-NIM were evaluated in dry eye patients. According to commonly accepted data, the average thickness of their corneal epithelium might be greater than that of normal people. It was revealed that HA-NIM maintains the average thickness of corneal epithelium in dry eye patients in contrast to the Optive Fusion® and Restasis®eye drops. In the animal model, HA-NIM improves the density of goblet cells and inhibits the infiltration of the cornea via CD11b+cells [11]. The significant tumoricidal activity of nimesulide conjugates, such as HAL-nimesulide and HAH-nimesulideis, have also been reported in the HT-29 cell line of colorectal cancer together with HT-29 xenografted mice via the initiation of apoptosis [12].Together with niosomely entrapped and HA-conjugated nimesulide, several other delivery systems were suggested. Among them, the nimesulide–β–cyclodextrin complexation serves as both a clinically and experimentally approved delivery system for nimesulide. The inclusion complex of β-cyclodextrin and nimesulide demonstrates a more favorable therapeutic profile compared to non-conjugated nimesulide drugs. The main therapeutic advantages of the β–CD–nimesulide complex over non-conjugated nimesulide demonstrate a better analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect together with better tolerability with an enhanced drug solubility and dissolution rate [13,14,15,16].
Numerous investigations conducted both in a “wet lab” and in silico indicate the many benefits of β-CD as a drug carrier; it can overcome the low water solubility and low bioavailability of therapeutic agents [17,18,19,20,21]. At the same time, limited data concerning the molecular dynamics simulation of the β–CD–nimesulide inclusion complex are available to the best of our knowledge. Thus, one of the aims of the present study was dedicated to in silico investigations of the β–CD–NIM complexes’ stability and its hydrophobic–hydrophilic characterization. The main distinguishing feature of any molecular dynamic simulation lies in its high accuracy and in the fact that it might reproduce events observed experimentally. In our work, we performed an experiment to obtain the inclusion complex of nimesulide in β–cyclodextrin under laboratory conditions. This theoretical approach to complexation is carried out with the help of quantum mechanical calculations and molecular dynamics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Instrumentation and Chemical Reagents

2.1.1. Chemical Reagents

AcrosOrganics CAS Number: 51803-78-2 nimesulide; AcrosOrganics CAS 68168-23-0 β,-γ-cyclodextrin were used in this work. N,N-Dimethylformamide, acetone, and methanol were also used (Chemistry: CAS68-12-2, CAS 67-64-1, CAS 67-56-1).

2.1.2. Analytical Equipment

The instrumentation for physicochemical methods of analysis includes the following:
  • Shimadzu UV1800 spectrophotometer: the quantitative analysis of complexation products.
  • FMS 1201 FT-IR spectrometer: the qualitative analysis of complexation products and the indirect confirmation of clath–rate inclusion complex formation.
  • Waters MSD SQD—ESI chromatograph: the quantitative analysis of complexation productsand qualitative analysis viaretention time.

2.2. Method for Obtaining the Inclusion Complex

The inclusion complexes were obtained usingvarious methods, including both the classical coprecipitation method and the more complicated co-evaporation method. The co-evaporation method consists ofthe simultaneous evaporation of liquid from an ideal solution obtained viamixing a solution of β-CD in distilled water and a suspension of nimesulide dissolved in excess DMFA. During the addition of the first portions of the nimesulide solution, a white, flaky precipitate may form in the reaction mixture. In this case, the addition of the nimesulide solution is slowed down or stopped until the precipitate is completely dissolved. The reaction mixture should be a homogeneous system free of precipitates and other undissolved particles.The evaporation was carried out at 70 °C for 48 h without any sudden jumps in temperature or boiling. In the case of the co-precipitation and co-evaporation method, we obtained a series of products, which were further subjected to physicochemical analysis.

2.3. Software Used for Molecular Modeling

The first step of the computational part of this study lies in obtaining the topologies of β-cyclodextrin and nimesulide while further modeling the complexity between them using Gaussian software [22], Figure 1. Our simulations were completed using the NAMD package, which is known as one of the most-used forms of software for MD studies of β-cyclodextrin and molecules resembling it [23]. In light of the absence of available parameter files that are compatible enough with such simulations, the customized CHARMM36 parameters were prepared based on previously published data [24]. Particularly, β-cyclodextrin, as a complicated compound, demonstrates a large diversity of atom types comprising its structure. Among them are several carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen atoms, which must be properly chosen.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Instrumental Methods

It was previously shown that the water–soluble complexation product is a mixture of the clathrate inclusion complex and nimesulide microcapsules in cyclodextrin The main objective of the complexation process with cyclodextrins is to obtain a stable clathrate complex at ahigh yield. Therefore, a qualitative and quantitative comparison of co-precipitation and co-evaporation methods for obtaining complexes of nimesulide with cyclodextrins was carried out. It was shown that the co-precipitation method is optimal for obtaining complexes with β-cyclodextrin. In the case of γ-cyclodextrin, co-evaporation is the best. Such conclusions are confirmed by the methods of quantitative UV analysis and HPLC, the results of which are presented in Table 1.
The results are given from the initial amount of nimesulide taken for the reaction without taking losses into account.
Thus, the choice of complexation technique allowed not only for an increase in the yield of the target product but also an increase in the proportion of nimesulide enclosed in the clathrate complex.

3.2. Computational Chemistry Methods

Each of the seven units in the β-cyclodextrin molecule is presented using D-glucopyranose, linked by ether oxygen to the next monomer in the manner of forming a cyclic structure, which β-CD is prominent for. Each unit in the β-CD molecule, in turn, is composed of both extracyclic and intracyclic carbon, several ether and hydroxyl oxygen atoms, etc. Atom types, therefore, may prove to be more than is clear at first sight. Thus, the atom types were determined in accordance with the specification suggested by Arsiccio A et al. for hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin [24]. In this way, each monomer (D-glucopyranose) of the β-CD molecule was represented by 4 types of carbon—CC3161 (C2, C3), CC3162 (C1, C4), CC3163 (C5) and CC321 (C6); 3 types of oxygen—OC301 (O2, O4), OC311 (O3, O6) and OC3C61 (O5); and 2 types of hydrogen—HCA1 (H1–H7) and HCP1 (H8, H9, H10)—in our simulations, see Figure 2.
The value of partial charges in atoms in the β-cyclodextrin molecule was also used as it was applied for hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, as proposed by Arsiccio A et al. [24]. The further parametrization of β-CD, which is essential for the simulation, including the determination of corresponding values of bond strength, angles, dihedrals, and impropers, was completed considering its similarity with existing data in various CHARMM parameter files, including CgenFF, the forcefield for drug-like molecules [25]; CHARMM27, the all-atom force field for nucleic acids [26]; CHARMM36, the all-atom additive protein force field [27] and several other for carbohydrates, ethers, lipids, etc. [28,29]. The parametrization of nimesulide (see Figure 3) and the creation of the waterbox (see Figure 4) were performed via the CHARMM-GUI online server [30]. Nimesulide was represented by 2 types of carbon—CC2R1 (all carbon atoms, except C13 which is linked to sulfur) and CC331 (C13); 2 types of nitrogen—NC201 (N1) and NC311 (N2); 3 types of oxygen—eOC301 (ether O1), OC2N1 (O2, O3) and OC2P1 (O4, O5); and 3 types of hydrogen—HCR61 (H1–H8), HCP1 (H9) and HCA3 (H10, H11, H12) and SC3O2—for the single serum atom.
The molecular dynamics simulation of the complex was performed under standard settings (310 °K, enabled Langevin dynamics) of the NAMD computer program [31] for 5 ns and analyzed using VMD V1.9.4 software [32]. The results of our in silico investigations confirmed the hydrophobic–hydrophilic characteristics of β-cyclodextrin as a proper drug carrier for nimesulide, with outer hydrophilicity on the one hand and a lack of water molecules in the hydrophobic cavity on the other during the entire period of simulation. Such a profile of interaction with water might promote the solubility of nimesulide to be enhanced at its release site in vivo and improve bioavailability. We also suggest the high stability of the β–CD–NIM complex, as no dissociation in the complex was observed [32,33]. An analysis of RMSD trajectories supports the idea of complex stability, as no drastic shifts in the RMSD curves were detected (Figure 5).

4. Conclusions

As a result of this study, it was possible to find an approach to explain the process of complexation with cyclodextrins as the carriers of the active substance. This technique of the synthesis of inclusion complexes can be tested on a wide class of non-steroidal drugs, as its repetition is easy to perform and does not require large material and time costs. The question of an improvement in drugs and methods of their point delivery is one of the most urgent today. Complexation with cyclodextrins is successful in this field. In turn, the method of analysis via molecular dynamics and computer modeling opens wide opportunities for studying the formation of complex supramolecular associates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V.G. and E.S.B.; methodology, E.S.B. and P.Y.A.; software, P.Y.A. and K.S.E.; validation, E.S.B. and K.A.B.; formal analysis, E.S.B. and E.V.G.; investigation, E.S.B., P.Y.A. and K.S.E.; resources, P.Y.A. and K.S.E.; data curation, E.S.B., P.Y.A. and E.V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.B. and P.Y.A.; writing—review and editing, E.S.B., P.Y.A. and K.A.B.; visualization, E.S.B.; supervision, E.V.G. and P.Y.A.; project administration, E.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mattia, C.; Ciarcia, S.; Muhindo, A.; Coluzzi, F. Nimesulide 25 annidopo [Nimesulide: 25 years later]. Minerva Med. 2010, 101, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Bjarnason, I.; Thjodleifsson, B. Gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: The effect of nimesulide compared with naproxen on the human gastrointestinal tract. Rheumatology 1999, 38 (Suppl. S1), 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rainsford, K.D.; Members of the Consensus Report Group on Nimesulide. Nimesulide—A multifactorial approach to inflammation and pain: Scientific and clinical consensus. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006, 22, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kwon, J.; Kim, S.; Yoo, H.; Lee, E. Nimesulide-induced hepatotoxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jain, K.K. An Overview of Drug Delivery Systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2059, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shahiwala, A.; Misra, A. Studies in topical application of niosomally entrapped Nimesulide. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 5, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, H.; Yiu, S.C. Dry eye disease: A review of diagnostic approaches and treatments. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 28, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zemanová, M. Dry eye disease: A review. Cesk. Slov. Oftalmol. 2021, 77, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taciak, B.; Białasek, M.; Braniewska, A.; Sas, Z.; Sawicka, P.; Kiraga, Ł.; Rygiel, T.; Król, M. Evaluation of phenotypic and functional stability of RAW 264.7 cell line through serial passages. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, T.Y.; Tseng, C.L.; Lin, C.A.; Lin, H.Y.; Venkatesan, P.; Lai, P.S. Effects of Eye Drops Containing Hyaluronic Acid-Nimesulide Conjugates in a Benzalkonium Chloride-Induced Experimental Dry Eye Rabbit Model. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jian, Y.-S.; Chen, C.-W.; Lin, C.-A.; Yu, H.-P.; Lin, H.-Y.; Liao, M.-Y.; Wu, S.-H.; Lin, Y.-F.; Lai, P.-S. Hyaluronic acid-nimesulide conjugates as anticancer drugs against CD44-overexpressing HT-29 colorectal cancer in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2315–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bocanegra, M.; Seijas, A.; Yibirín, M.G. Efficacy and tolerability of conventional nimesulide versus Beta-cyclodextrin nimesulide in patients with pain after surgical dental extraction: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. Curr. Ther. Res. Clin. Exp. 2003, 64, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Auda, S.H. Nimesulide/methyl β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: Physicochemical characterization, solubility, dissolution, and biological studies. Drug Dev. Res. 2014, 75, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Paiva-Santos, A.C.; Ferreira, L.; Peixoto, D.; Silva, F.; Soares, M.J.; Zeinali, M.; Zafar, H.; Mascarenhas-Melo, F.; Raza, F.; Mazzola, P.G.; et al. Cyclodextrins as an encapsulation molecular strategy for volatile organic compounds- Pharmaceutical applications. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 218, 112758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Scolari, G.; Lazzarin, F.; Fornaseri, C.; Carbone, V.; Rengo, S.; Amato, M.; Cicciù, D.; Braione, D.; Argentino, S.; Morgantini, A.; et al. A comparison of nimesulide beta cyclodextrin and nimesulide in postoperative dental pain. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 1999, 53, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Xu, F.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shi, Y.; Lai, D.; Sriboonvorakul, N.; Hu, J. A Review of Cyclodextrin Encapsulation and Intelligent Response for the Release of Curcumin. Polymers 2022, 14, 5421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lawtrakul, L.; Viernstein, H.; Wolschann, P. Molecular dynamics simulations of beta-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 256, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Munk, J.T.; Nygaard-Thomsen, S.; Stokholm, T.R.B.; Langhorn, M.R.; Steinmann, C. Ensemble Simulations of 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin Complexes with All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ChemRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khuntawee, W.; Wolschann, P.; Rungrotmongkol, T.; Wong-Ekkabut, J.; Hannongbua, S. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Interaction of Beta Cyclodextrin with a Lipid Bilayer. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 55, 1894–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Megariotis, G.; Mikaelian, G.; Avramopoulos, A.; Romanos, N.; Theodorou, D.N. Molecular simulations of fluoxetine in hydrated lipid bilayers, as well as in aqueous solutions containing β-cyclodextrin. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2022, 117, 108305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mazurek, A.H.; Szeleszczuk, Ł.; Gubica, T. Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in the Analysis of Cyclodextrin Complexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arsiccio, A.; Rospiccio, M.; Shea, J.E.; Pisano, R. Force Field Parameterization for the Description of the Interactions between Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin and Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 7397–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vanommeslaeghe, K.; Hatcher, E.; Acharya, C.; Kundu, S.; Zhong, S.; Shim, J.; Darian, E.; Guvench, O.; Lopes, P.; Vorobyov, I.; et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 671–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. MacKerell, A.D., Jr.; Banavali, N.; Foloppe, N. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 2000, 56, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, J.; MacKerell, A.D., Jr. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2135–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pastor, R.W.; Mackerell, A.D., Jr. Development of the CHARMM Force Field for Lipids. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 1526–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Guvench, O.; Mallajosyula, S.S.; Raman, E.P.; Hatcher, E.; Vanommeslaeghe, K.; Foster, T.J.; Jamison, I.F.W., 2nd; MacKerell, J.A.D., Jr. CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate-protein modeling. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 3162–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jo, S.; Cheng, X.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Patel, D.S.; Beaven, A.H.; Lee, K.I.; Rui, H.; Park, S.; et al. CHARMM-GUI 10 years for biomolecular modeling and simulation. J. Comput. Chem. 2017, 38, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Phillips, J.C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R.D.; Kalé, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grekhneva, E.V.; Barteneva, E.S.; Efanov, K.S. Peculiarities of Obtaining and Modeling the Structure of Nimesulide Clathrate Complexes with β- and γ-Cyclodextrins. Chem. Proc. 2022, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ekaterina, B.; Elena, G.; Kirill, E. Substantiation of the Possibility of Obtaining Complex Including Nimesulide with γ-CD by Computer Modeling Methods. Polym. Sci Peer Rev J. PSPRJ 2023, 4, 000596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The β–cyclodextrin–nimesulide inclusion complex, modelled via Gaussian software. Nimesulide is highlighted in green, and β-cyclodextrin is highlighted in blue.
Figure 1. The β–cyclodextrin–nimesulide inclusion complex, modelled via Gaussian software. Nimesulide is highlighted in green, and β-cyclodextrin is highlighted in blue.
Engproc 56 00245 g001
Figure 2. CHARMM atom types, used for β-cyclodextrin parametrization. One of the 7 β-CD units is highlighted.
Figure 2. CHARMM atom types, used for β-cyclodextrin parametrization. One of the 7 β-CD units is highlighted.
Engproc 56 00245 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of nimesulide with specified atom types.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of nimesulide with specified atom types.
Engproc 56 00245 g003
Figure 4. β–cyclodextrin–nimesulide complex in aqueous solution: (A) upper view, (B) side view.
Figure 4. β–cyclodextrin–nimesulide complex in aqueous solution: (A) upper view, (B) side view.
Engproc 56 00245 g004
Figure 5. Diagram of RMSD trajectories. Nimesulide is represented blue and β-CD is marked in green.
Figure 5. Diagram of RMSD trajectories. Nimesulide is represented blue and β-CD is marked in green.
Engproc 56 00245 g005
Table 1. Results of quantitative analysis.
Table 1. Results of quantitative analysis.
UF
Type of CyclodextrinPreparation MethodAmount of Nimesulide in the Finished Product, %massAmount of Nimesulide in the Filtrate, %mass
β-Co-precipitation7221
Co-evaporation4352
γ-Co-precipitation1967
Co-evaporation878
HPLC
Type of CyclodextrinPreparation MethodAmount of Nimesulide in the Finished Product, %massAmount of Nimesulide in the Filtrate, %mass
Nimesulide encapsulated in CD, %massInclusion complex, %mass
β-Co-precipitation214319
Co-evaporation83554
γ-Co-precipitation51265
Co-evaporation12747
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andreev, P.Y.; Barteneva, E.S.; Grekhneva, E.V.; Efanov, K.S.; Breskin, K.A. A New Approach to the Preparation of Inclusion Complexes with Cyclodextrins: Studying Their Stability Using Molecular Dynamics Methods. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15817

AMA Style

Andreev PY, Barteneva ES, Grekhneva EV, Efanov KS, Breskin KA. A New Approach to the Preparation of Inclusion Complexes with Cyclodextrins: Studying Their Stability Using Molecular Dynamics Methods. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andreev, Pavel Y., Ekaterina S. Barteneva, Elena V. Grekhneva, Kirill S. Efanov, and Kirill A. Breskin. 2023. "A New Approach to the Preparation of Inclusion Complexes with Cyclodextrins: Studying Their Stability Using Molecular Dynamics Methods" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15817

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop