Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Type-1 Fuzzy Controller for Lag-Dominant First and Second Order Nonlinear Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Pneumatic Conveying Technology: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Current Developments in Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Friction Stir Spot Welding (FSSW) of Aluminium and Titanium Alloys †

by
Mukuna Patrick Mubiayi
Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 184; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15881
Published: 7 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
To fabricate joints of dissimilar materials such as alumnium and titanium with excellent joint properties with limited defects, there is a need to use effective joining techniques. Friction stir welding (FSW) and friction stir spot welding (FSSW) are solid-state welding techniques considered environmentally friendly joining techniques. The two techniques have been used to join numerous materials including aluminium, copper, and titanium. Joining dissimilar materials has seen a signifcant expansion worldwide due to the high demand for dissimilar joining exhibiting specific properties to be used for specific applications. This short review presents the resulting properties of joints made with aluminium and titanium using friction stir welding and friction stir spot welding. Microstructure evolution, mechanical properties, and other properties are presented and critically reviewed. Many aluminium and titanium alloys have been welded using several process parameters and tool geometries. In FSW, it has been seen that aluminium/titanium exhibited high strength when the rotational speed is well controlled. From the gathered information, it was concluded that the tool rotational speed was associated with heat input and low speed resulting in low heat input. This produced fine recrystallized grains, especially at the joint interface. On the other hand, FSSW has also been utilized to weld Al to Ti. The results showed that parameters such as rotational speed and dwell time had an impact on the formation of intermetallic compounds (IMCs) including Ti3Al and mechanical properties were achieved. It was observed that FSSW between aluminium and titanium has not been well researched; therefore, there is a need to further study the behavior of the two materials when spot welded. It is expected that the augmentation of knowledge on the fabricated joint behavior will lead to the expansion of these techniques for specific applications and to the optimization of FSW and FSSW between alumnium and titanium alloys.

1. Introduction

The joining of materials with different properties has been a focus of numerous studies. Many joining techniques including resistance welding and friction welding have been used to join similar and dissimilar materials [1,2]. Friction stir welding (FSW) was developed and known as a reliable solid-state joining technique [3]. On the other hand, friction stir spot welding (FSSW) is a variant of FSW and is an established alternative joining procedure for resistance welding. FSW and FSSW use a non-consumable spinning tool for joining different materials. The schematic illustrations of friction stir welding and friction stir spot welding are shown in Figure 1.
Friction stir welding and friction stir spot welding processes use a non-consumable rotating tool consisting of a pin and a shoulder that is forced into the edges of the workpieces [4]. It should further be noted that in the solid-state joining processes, few defects are produced and that is because the materials to be joined do not reach their melting temperatures [5]. Friction stir welding and friction stir spot welding have been used to join a large number of materials [6,7]. On the other hand, FSW and FSSW between aluminium and titanium are not well-researched [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. These solid-state joining techniques have gained popularity because the welding of dissimilar materials using advanced and conventional fusion techniques is challenging due to the differences in the metallurgical and mechanical properties of the materials to be joined [31]. Titanium alloys are widely utilized in aerospace, rail transportation, and biomedical sectors because of their excellent properties (high strength, high melting point, corrosion resistance), while aluminium alloys also display excellent properties including low density, high strength, and good processability. Furthermore, aluminium alloys are also less costly, while titanium alloys are expensive and have poor processibility that prevents their extensive utilization [21,37,38,39]. Since the two alloys exhibit different properties including the melting point, thermal conductivity, and linear expansion coefficient, a proper joint configuration is essential. Moreover, the welding of aluminium to titanium has a major application in the aerospace industry in the fabrication of body structures where high strength and light weight are needed to reduce fuel consumption [31].
For FSW and FSSW, the titanium is put on the advancing side since it has been reported that the harder materials should be placed on the advancing side to maximize the performance of the fabricated joints [21,40,41]. During the FSW and FSSW of Al to Ti, there is usually the formation of intermetallic compounds (IMCs); however, it has been reported that when the right process parameters and tool geometries are used, there is a significant reduction in IMCs that is linked to the generation of heat (heat input) [2,42,43,44,45,46]. And that has an effect on the resulting properties of the fabricated joints. More studies are needed to be carried out to further understand the behaviour of the two materials when joined using FSW and FSSW. Therefore, this review provides a short overview of the current trend in FSW and FSSW between aluminium and titanium alloys.

2. Friction Stir Welding (FSW) between Aluminium and Titanium Alloys

A number of studies are available in the open literature on FSW between Al and Ti focusing on the effects of the process parameter on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of the fabricated joints. It was observed that the process parameters, especially the rotational speed and traverse speed, resulted in a higher heat input that impacted the resulting properties.
Patel et al. [12] used hybrid approaches of FSW to join pure Ti and AA6061-T651 aluminium alloys. They indicated that water cooling can be explored as a novel processing condition when friction stir welding aluminium to titanium. They further said that the tensile strength was improved for the joints fabricated with water-cooling and was attributed to grain refinement and strengthening; however, when the cooling was reduced, the tensile strength was negatively affected. A similar trend was observed for the microhardness results. They also observed the presence of intermetallic compounds at the joint interface. In other studies, the presence of intermetallics was observed by Wu et al. [21] on FS Welds of Ti-6Al-4V and AA6061 when the rotational speed was raised. On the other hand, when the rotational speed was lower, a pure homogeneous interface without an intermetallic compound (IMC) and small interface thickness was observed. Additionally, the mechanical properties were also affected by the process parameters. Also, Geyer et al. [17] friction stir welded AA2024-T3 to Ti-6Al-4V overlap joints and observed that a high rotational speed results in a high heat input, resulting in welding defects such as hooks and a thicker layer of IMC at the interface of the Ti-6Al-4V and AA2024-T3 weld joint. In another study, when the traverse speed was increased, a grain size decrease was observed, in addition to the excessive formation of intermetallics within the alumnium to titanium mixture (Ti-6Al4V and AA6061) [13].

3. Friction Stir Spot Welding (FSSW) between Aluminium and Titanium Alloys

When compared to FSW between alumnium and titanium, FSSW of Al to Ti has not received the same attention. Limited studies have been published in the open literature. Nasir et al. [28] investigated the FSSW of AA7075-T651 to Ti-6Al-4V alloys using a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) as an interlayer material. The effect of welding parameters and the presence of the interlayer material was investigated. The results showed an increment in the shear tensile strength (maximum) that was due to the heat input that melted the carbon fiber-reinforced polymer interlayer material and resulted in the enhancement of the formed bond between the materials. They also indicated that the dwell time has a significant effect on the shear tensile load (Figure 2b). However, the hardness values were principally affected by the tool rotational speed as depicted in Figure 2c. The SEM/EDS analysis showed the presence of intermetallic compounds (Ti3Al and Ti-Al-C), which were found to impact the shear tensile strength of the fabricated joints (Figure 2a). The formation of intermetallics depended on the heat cycle of a weld joint, which was linked to the process parameters utilized, namely rotational speed and dwell time [28].
Furthermore, some studies were carried out on the refill friction stir spot welding (RFSSW) between aluminum and titanium [22,26,27]. Friction stir spot welding was used to join AA5754-H22 to Ti-6Al-4V and the keyhole was refilled [27]. In this study, it was observed that the refill process had a substantial effect on the microstructure evolution changes along the welded part and that had a direct effect on the mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of the fabricated welds [22]. It can be said and has been reported that the refill process of the formed keyhole during FSSW will affect the integrity of the fabricated joint. Therefore, this process should be encouraged, investigated, and utilized to achieve better surface finish and properties.

4. Conclusions

Friction stir welding and friction stir spot welding between aluminium and titanium were successfully carried out using various tool geometries and process parameters. Process parameters such as rotational speed, traverse speed, and tool plunge depth have an important role in the integrity of the fabricated weldments. To produce joints with excellent properties, the heat input must be controlled, which can be achieved by using a higher rotational speed and lower traverse speed for FSW. As for FSSW, not much information is available on the effect of process parameters. Therefore, more studies are needed to produce more data, which would lead to the optimization of the solid welding process. It was further noticed when FSW is used to join titanium alone or aluminium alone, the two materials demonstrated an improved corrosion resistance. Therefore, studies on the corrosion resistance of FSW and FSSW between aluminium and titanium should be carried out and investigated. This would enable the two technologies to be extensively used.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the support from the University of South Africa and the Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability (iNanoWS).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, V.; Kumar, S. A review report on mechanical properties of Al 6106 T6 alloy joined by friction stir welding and TIG welding. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Res. Excell. 2016, 6, 2250–2726. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mubiayi, M.P.; Akinlabi, E.T. Evolving properties of friction stir spot welds between AA1060 and commercially pure copper C11000. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2016, 26, 1852–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thomas, W.M.; Nicholas, E.D.; Needham, J.C.; Murch, M.G.; Temple-Smith, P.; Dawes, C.J. Friction Stir Butt Welding. U.S. Patent No. PCT/GB92/02203; GB Patent Application No. 9125978.8, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mishra, R.S.; Mahoney, M.W. Introduction. In Friction Stir Welding and Processing; Mishra, R.S., Mahoney, M.W., Eds.; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mathers, G. The Welding of Aluminium and Its Alloys; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hou, W.; Shah, L.H.A.; Huang, G.; Shen, Y.; Gerlich, A. The role of tool offset on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Cu friction stir welded joints. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 825, 154045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bagheri, B.; Abdollahzadeh, A.; Shamsipur, A. A different attempt to analysis friction stir spot welding of AA5083-copper alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 39, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dressler, U.; Biallas, G.; Mercado, U.A. Friction stir welding of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 to aluminium alloy AA2024-T3. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 526, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kar, A.; Choudhury, S.K.; Suwas, S.; Kailas, S.V. Effect of niobium interlayer in dissimilar friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium. Mater. Charact. 2018, 145, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sundar, A.S.; Vardhan, T.V.; Kumar, A. Microstructural characterization of aluminium-titanium friction stir welds. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 5845–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sadeghi-Ghoghery, M.; Kasiri-Asgarani, M.; Amini, K. Friction stir welding of dissimilar joints between commercially pure titanium alloy and 7075 aluminium alloy. Trans. FAMENA 2017, 41, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patel, P.; Rana, H.; Badheka, V.; Patel, V.; Li, W. Effect of active heating and cooling on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir–welded dissimilar aluminium alloy and titanium butt joints. Weld. World 2020, 64, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, L.; Yu, M.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, Z.; Guo, F.; Song, X. Dissimilar friction stir welding of AA6061 and Ti6Al4V alloys: A study on microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Manuf. Process. 2019, 48, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shehabeldeen, T.A.; Yin, Y.; Ji, X.; Shen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, J. Investigation of the microstructure, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanisms of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminium/titanium joints. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rostami, H.; Nourouzi, S.; Aval, H.J. The investigation of structure and mechanical properties Dissimilar joining of aluminum 5052 sheets to titanium alloy by friction stir welding. Modares Mecartarrhanical Eng. 2016, 16, 187–195. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mishra, R.S.; Rani, P. Friction stir welding/processing studies of aluminum alloy & titanium 64. Int. J. Res. Eng. Innov. 2017, 1, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  17. Geyer, M.; Vidal, V.; Pottier, T.; Boher, C.; Rezai-Aria, F. Investigations on the material flow and the role of the resulting hooks on the mechanical behavior of dissimilar friction stir welded Al2024-T3 to Ti-6Al-4V overlap joints. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 292, 117057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, G. Study on the joining of titanium and aluminum dissimilar alloys by friction stir welding. Open Mater. Sci. J. 2011, 5, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buffa, G.; De Lisi, M.; Barcellona, A.; Fratini, L. Material flow analysis in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA2024 and Ti6Al4V butt joints. In MATEC Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2016; Volume 80, p. 15003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bang, K.S.; Lee, K.J.; Bang, H.S.; Bang, H.S. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welds between 6061-T6 aluminum and Ti-6% Al-4% V alloys. Mater. Trans. 2011, 52, 974–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, A.; Song, Z.; Nakata, K.; Liao, J.; Zhou, L. Interface and properties of the friction stir welded joints of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V with aluminum alloy 6061. Mater. Des. 2015, 71, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lacki, P.; Derlatka, A. Strength evaluation of beam made of the aluminum 6061-T6 and titanium grade 5 alloy sheets joined by RFSSW and RSW. Compos. Struct. 2017, 159, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.W.; Feng, W.Y.; Li, W.Y.; Chu, Q.; Xu, Y.X.; Ma, T.J.; Wang, W.B. Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar pinless friction stir spot welded 2A12 aluminum alloy and TC4 titanium alloy joints. J. Cent. South Univ. 2018, 25, 3075–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asmael, M.B.A.; Glaissa, M.A.A. Effects of rotation speed and dwell time on the mechanical properties and microstructure of dissimilar aluminum-titanium alloys by friction stir spot welding (FSSW). Mater. Werkst. 2020, 51, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prasomthong, S.; Kaewchaloon, A.; Charoenrat, S. Optimization of friction stir spot welding between aluminium alloys and titanium alloy by the Taguchi method. Creat. Sci. 2022, 14, 245169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nan, X.; Zhao, H.; Ma, C.; Sun, S.; Sun, G.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Wang, R.; Song, X. Interface characterization and formation mechanism of Al/Ti dissimilar joints of refill friction stir spot welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 126, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vacchi, G.S.; Silva, R.; Plaine, A.H.; Suhuddin, U.F.H.; Alcântara, N.G.; Sordi, V.L.; Rovere, C.A.D. Refill friction stir spot welded AA5754-H22/Ti-6Al-4V joints: Microstructural characterization and electrochemical corrosion behavior of aluminum surfaces. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nasir, T.; Kalaf, O.; Asmael, M.; Zeeshan, Q.; Safaei, B.; Hussain, G.; Motallebzadeh, A. The experimental study of CFRP interlayer of dissimilar joint AA7075-T651/Ti-6Al-4V alloys by friction stir spot welding on mechanical and microstructural properties. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2021, 10, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asmael, M.; Nasir, T.; Zeeshan, Q.; Safaei, B.; Kalaf, O.; Motallebzadeh, A.; Hussain, G. Prediction of properties of friction stir spot welded joints of AA7075-T651/Ti-6Al-4V alloy using machine learning algorithms. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2022, 22, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kar, A.; Suwas, S.; Kailas, S.V. Multi-length scale characterization of microstructure evolution and its consequence on mechanical properties in dissimilar friction stir welding of titanium to aluminum. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 5153–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kar, A.; Malopheyev, S.; Mironov, S.; Kaibyshev, R.; Suwas, S.; Kailas, S.V. A new method to elucidate fracture mechanism and microstructure evolution in titanium during dissimilar friction stir welding of aluminum and titanium. Mater. Charact. 2021, 171, 110791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kar, A.; Kailas, S.V.; Suwas, S. Friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium: Quest for optimum tool-offset, deformation of titanium, and mechanism of joint formation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2023, 128, 1943–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dias, F.; Cipriano, G.; Correia, A.N.; Braga, D.F.; Moreira, P.; Infante, V. Joining of aluminum alloy AA7075 and titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V through a friction stir welding-based process. Metals 2023, 13, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Y.; Shi, L.; Wu, C.S.; Jiang, Y.N. Achieving high property medium-thick Ti/Al dissimilar joints by double side friction stir welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2022, 27, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumar, A.; Mugada, K.K. Investigation of material flow, microstructure evolution, and texture development in dissimilar friction stir welding of Al6061 to Ti6Al4V. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104424. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kar, A.; Suwas, S.; Kailas, S.V. Significance of tool offset and copper interlayer during friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 100, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gangwar, K.; Ramulu, M. Friction stir welding of titanium alloys: A review. Mater. Des. 2018, 141, 230–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thomae, M.; Gester, A.; Wagner, G. Comparison of process behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrasound enhanced friction stir welded titanium/titanium joints. Weld. World 2022, 66, 1131–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, Z.; Sun, X.; Ji, S.; Wang, Y.; Yue, Y. Influences of ultrasonic on friction stir welding of Al/Ti dissimilar alloys under different welding conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 112, 2573–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Firouzdor, V.; Kou, S. Al-to-Mg friction stir welding: Effect of material position, travel speed, and rotation speed. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2010, 41, 2914–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, B.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Hu, W.; Luo, L. Dissimilar friction stir welding of Ti–6Al–4V alloy and aluminum alloy employing a modified butt joint configuration: Influences of process variables on the weld interfaces and tensile properties. Mater. Des. 2014, 53, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, Y.C.; Fuji, A. Factors dominating joint characteristics in Ti–Al friction welds. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2002, 7, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tseng, W.T. Calculations of lattice parameters and reaction-induced volume and stress change for Al (Ti) alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 3521–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, H.; Yu, M.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Song, X. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Ti dissimilar joints fabricated via friction stir welding. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 789, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shehabeldeen, T.A.; El-Shafai, N.M.; El-Mehasseb, I.M.; Yin, Y.; Ji, X.; Shen, X.; Zhou, J. Improvement of microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir welded aluminum/titanium joints via aluminum oxide nanopowder. Vacuum 2021, 188, 110216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, Y.; Ke, L.; Ouyang, S.; Mao, Y.; Niu, P. Precipitation behavior of intermetallic compounds and their effect on mechanical properties of thick plate friction stir welded Al/Mg joint. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 64, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Friction stir welding and (b) friction stir spot welding illustrations.
Figure 1. (a) Friction stir welding and (b) friction stir spot welding illustrations.
Engproc 56 00184 g001
Figure 2. FSSW of AA7075–T651 to Ti–6Al–4V alloys using a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer interlayer: (a) SEM/EDS, (b) shear tensile strengths, and (c) microhardness profiles [28].
Figure 2. FSSW of AA7075–T651 to Ti–6Al–4V alloys using a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer interlayer: (a) SEM/EDS, (b) shear tensile strengths, and (c) microhardness profiles [28].
Engproc 56 00184 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mubiayi, M.P. Current Developments in Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Friction Stir Spot Welding (FSSW) of Aluminium and Titanium Alloys. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15881

AMA Style

Mubiayi MP. Current Developments in Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Friction Stir Spot Welding (FSSW) of Aluminium and Titanium Alloys. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mubiayi, Mukuna Patrick. 2023. "Current Developments in Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Friction Stir Spot Welding (FSSW) of Aluminium and Titanium Alloys" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15881

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop