Next Article in Journal
Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks: Recent Advances and Future Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Modeling of a Transmission Coefficient for Ultrasonic Waves in Human Cancellous Bone
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Biotechnological Solutions for Recycling Synthetic Fibers †

1
Department of Textile and Paper Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 03801 Alcoy, Spain
2
Faculty of Apparel Engineering and Textile Processing, Berlin School of Culture + Design, Berlin University of Applied Sciences—HTW Berlin, 12459 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-16301
Published: 17 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
Biotechnology offers the potential for selective depolymerization of natural and synthetic fibers, isolation of components, or recovery of monomers. This progress solves the problems associated with the regeneration of monomers from synthetic fiber blends, especially when contaminated or mixed fibers are involved. In addition, the recycling of used fiber products into higher-value products not only keeps waste out of landfills but also creates economic opportunities and reduces the need to produce new synthetic fibers. Synthetic fibers can be recovered by mechanical or chemical recycling, but biotechnological solutions with enzymes offer a more environmentally friendly alternative to harsh chemicals by selectively breaking down certain chemical bonds in polymers to obtain purer monomeric building blocks. Efficient biotechnological recycling, however, depends on the specific polymer, as different enzymes, microbial colonies, fungal hyphae, etc. can process different man-made fibers. Challenges arise with any type of fiber recovery, including enzymatic degradation when suitable enzymes have not yet been discovered or when fiber blends impede accessibility and efficiency. This short review provides an overview of the possibilities of biotechnological solutions for synthetic fiber recovery.

1. Introduction

As environmental awareness of sustainable practices increases, the textile industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its environmental impact. The widespread use of synthetic fibers, while contributing to diverse and affordable textile products, has led to a growing problem of waste accumulation due to their slow degradation [1,2]. Textile fiber recycling includes mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, including pyrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, hydrothermal technology, ammonolysis, gasification, glycolysis, and decolorization to reduce the amount of textile waste that is incinerated or landfilled. Chemical treatment is an effective method of textile recycling in which chemicals are added to break down the complex textile polymer into smaller polymer molecules. Today, chemical recycling is a popular method for degrading polymers, solution-purified polymers, oligomers, monomers, or raw materials in gaseous or liquid form, all of which are products of chemical textile recycling. Re-polymerization can be used to renew polymers such as oligomers and monomers, even in textile waste. In contrast, mechanical textile recycling has been used since the beginning of the industrial revolution. It is one of the cheapest and simplest recycling methods [3,4,5]. However, not all of these processes are suitable for recycling synthetic fibers in a sustainable manner. In response, biotechnological approaches have emerged as promising alternatives for recycling and degrading synthetic fibers. The use of microorganisms that degrade synthetic fibers in bioreactors is a viable approach for large-scale recycling [6,7]. This short review focuses on mechanical and biotechnological solutions (see Figure 1).
For example, Marqués-Calvo et al. described the results of enzymatic and microbial biodegradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and PET copolyester plastics using two commercial fungal lipases and two bacteria from environmental isolates on a laboratory basis [8]. On the other hand, Mohanan et al. described the microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics used in the textile industry [9]. Incorporating biotechnological solutions into current recycling approaches that promote environmental conservation and enable the transition to a circular economy has regulatory aspects [10]. This short review explores the potential of biotechnological solutions in synthetic fiber recycling. It addresses the challenges and highlights applications that hold the key to a more sustainable textile economy. It addresses enzymatic degradation, a fundamental facet of biocatalysis, and demonstrates the potential of enzymes for targeted degradation of various synthetic fibers with minimal by-product generation.

2. Mechanical Recycling Processes and Limitations

Mechanical recycling processes such as mechanical sorting, mechanical shredding, and melt spinning are central to the sustainable management of man-made fibers and provide cost-effective and widely used approaches to various stages of the recycling process. However, these methods of recycling also have limitations. The mechanical recycling of textiles leads to a reduction in quality due to the reduction in fiber length, and this is reflected in the limited possibilities of use on the end market. The microscopic image in Figure 2 shows a textile fabric made from recycled polyester (PES) fibers, presumably mechanically recycled and consisting of 20% polyester and 80% cotton (see Figure 2a, shopping bag, Comco Plast CCC GmbH, Duesseldorf, Germany). Images were taken using a digital microscope (Keyence, VHX-970FN, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). The fibers in the warp threads are relatively short, and the surface of the yarn is uneven, with individual fibers protruding (see Figure 2b).
Mechanical sorting is an important method that uses equipment such as conveyors and air sifters to efficiently separate synthetic fibers from other materials based on physical characteristics such as size, density, or shape. It excels with large materials but can be limited when dealing with similar properties, potentially leading to contamination. Mechanical shredding, on the other hand, plays a key role in reducing material size and preparing it for further processing, making it more manageable and compatible with subsequent recycling steps [11,12,13]. Mechanical sorting struggles with similar materials and risks contamination; sorting accuracy is critical. Mechanical shredding raises concerns about fiber damage and energy consumption, requiring improvements in sustainability. Melt spinning is energy-intensive and suitable for specific synthetic fibers, limiting its broader applicability [14].

3. Biotechnological Perspectives for Synthetic Fiber Recycling

Biotechnological implementations offer a range of innovative solutions to improve synthetic fiber recycling. These approaches use the natural capabilities of microorganisms and enzymes to degrade fibers, generate valuable products, and contribute to a more sustainable and circular textile industry. Ongoing research and development in this area has the potential to revolutionize the management of synthetic fiber waste and promote environmental protection [15].

3.1. Enzymatic Degradation

Enzymatic degradation of synthetic fibers occurs through the directed action of enzymes that target specific molecular bonds within the polymer structure [16]. Enzymes such as proteases, lipases, and cellulases have substrate specificity that enables them to cleave peptide, ester, and glycoside bonds, respectively. Esterases, for example, have been successful in degrading polyester-based synthetic fibers, while other enzymes target different types of synthetic fibers. Enzymatic hydrolysis disrupts the molecular structure of the fiber, leading to the formation of shorter oligomers and, eventually, monomers that can be assimilated by microorganisms or used as starting materials for biochemical processes [17,18]. Enzymatic degradation of synthetic fibers not only helps in waste management but also opens up opportunities for the circular economy. The resulting degradation products, such as monomers and oligomers, can serve as feedstocks for biopolymers, biofuels, and other value-added products, reducing dependence on fossil resources. In addition, enzymatic degradation helps reduce the environmental impact associated with the accumulation of synthetic fiber waste [19,20,21]. Bei et al. investigated the enzymatic degradability of the three polyester types using cutinase and found that the biological degradability depends on the spacing of the ester groups and the crystallinity. In addition, the ratio of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the polyester surface is crucial for its enzymatic degradability [22]. Figure 3 shows scanning electron micrographs of polyester films (PES) that have been degraded for 2, 4 and 10 h and the changes in the surface morphology.
Navone et al. studied the selective digestion of fiber composites of wool-polyester blends using an enzymatic approach by applying a keratinase in a two-step process with the addition of a reducing agent, and the undigested polyester fibers were recovered. Spectroscopic and mechanical analysis of the recovered synthetic fibers confirmed that the enzymatic treatment had no significant effect on the properties of the polyester compared to untreated samples [23]. Egan et al. report on enzymatic textile fiber separation for sustainable waste processing [24]. Tiso et al. investigate the sequential conversion of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) into two types of bioplastics, a medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and a novel bio-based poly(amideurethane) (Bio-PU), using a terephthalate-degrading Pseudomonas umsongensis GO16 [25]. Limitations of this enzymatic recycling method for synthetic fibers may include the specificity of enzymes, making them less effective on certain types of synthetic fibers. Additionally, the efficiency of enzymatic degradation could depend on the specific synthetic fiber and process conditions, potentially limiting its applicability.

3.2. Microbial Biodegradation

Microbial biodegradation uses the natural ability of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi to break down complex synthetic polymers into simpler compounds. Several microorganisms have been identified that possess enzymes that can degrade synthetic fibers. For example, certain bacteria can produce enzymes such as esterases and lipases that target the ester bonds present in polyester fibers. Researchers have also explored the potential of bioaugmentation and biostimulation techniques. Bioaugmentation involves the introduction of specific microorganisms into the environment, while biostimulation aims to increase the activity of existing microorganisms by providing nutrients or other growth-promoting factors. These approaches aim to accelerate the degradation process and increase the efficiency of fiber degradation [26,27,28]. Wei and Zimmermann focused on microbial biocatalysts involved in the degradation of the synthetic plastics polyethylene, polystyrene, polyurethane, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [29]. Advances in genetic engineering allow the modification of microorganisms to enhance their ability to degrade synthetic fibers. By introducing specific genes or pathways, scientists can tailor microorganisms to efficiently break down complex fiber structures and produce valuable end products. Schiros et al. reported on the genetic engineering of microorganisms for biofabrication, green chemical processing of raw materials, and green manufacturing processes for the textile industry. They provided an overview of future perspectives for sustainable bio-textile production, focusing on the use of waste streams to improve both recyclability and process economics [30]. Zimmermann reviewed the biocatalytic recycling of polyethylene terephthalate plastic [31]. Yoshida et al. showed that the new species Ideonella sakaiensis degrades plastic using two enzymes to hydrolyze poly(ethylene terephthalate) PET. Bacteria isolated outside of a bottle recycling facility to degrade and metabolize plastic [32]. Conventional synthetic fibers such as polyester, nylon, and acrylic are derived from petroleum-based resources and end up in landfills or the environment, where they can persist for years and contribute to environmental pollution [33,34]. Biochemical recycling uses biological processes to break down synthetic fibers into their individual molecules, which can then be used to make new fibers or other materials. The conversion of depolymerized synthetic fiber monomers into valuable chemicals and materials can be facilitated by biotechnological processes. These monomers can be used as feedstocks to make new polymers, reducing the need for virgin resources. This approach can help close the loop in synthetic fiber production and minimize waste generation [35,36]. The limitations of microbial biodegradation and enzymatic methods for synthetic fiber recycling include the potential specificity of microorganisms and enzymes, as they may not be equally effective on all types of synthetic fibers. Additionally, the efficiency of the degradation process depends on the specific fiber and process conditions.

4. Current Challenges and Limitations

While biotechnological solutions are promising, several challenges remain. Identifying suitable enzymes or microbial strains for a wide range of synthetic fibers remains a daunting task. Optimizing degradation rates, as well as understanding potential by-products and their environmental impact, requires careful research. In addition, the scalability of biotechnological processes to meet industrial demands requires careful consideration [37,38]. This field is still in its infancy and faces several challenges. Enzymatic degradation of synthetic fibers can be slow and may not result in a sufficient amount of high-quality building blocks for the production of new fibers. Synthetic fibers come in different formulations, and developing enzymes that can effectively degrade all types of synthetic fibers is challenging because of the different chemical structures. Degradation can produce contaminants or fragments that are difficult to separate from the degraded building blocks, compromising the quality of the recycled material. While laboratory-scale trials are promising, scaling up enzymatic processes to an industrial scale can be complex and costly [39,40,41]. The increasing use of synthetic fibers in textiles has led to serious environmental concerns because they are not biodegradable. Conventional recycling methods based on mechanical and chemical processes are inadequate for the increasing amount of synthetic fiber waste. Biotechnological approaches have emerged as a promising solution for sustainable and effective recycling.

5. Conclusions

This short review discusses recent biotechnological advances in the treatment of synthetic fiber waste and the potential and limitations of mechanical and biotechnological solutions. Biodegradation is emphasized, highlighting the potential of enzymes for targeted degradation of synthetic fibers with minimal by-product formation. The integration of microbial consortia and genetically modified microorganisms offers innovative strategies to convert recalcitrant synthetic fibers into valuable resources. The use of fiber-degrading microorganisms in bioreactors enables large-scale recycling. Incorporating biotechnology into recycling concepts requires a holistic assessment that considers environmental protection and regulatory compliance. The potential of biotechnology is one of the most promising solutions for recycling synthetic fibers, supporting environmental sustainability, and the transition to a circular economy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.K. and C.G.; methodology, all authors; validation, A.M. and L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.K., A.M. and L.S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, C.G., A.M. and L.S.; supervision, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, P.; Bhadra, S.; Ray, S.S. Combination of Mechanical and Chemical Recycling of Polyamide 6 and Polyamide 66 Fibers: Effect of 35 6-Membered-Ring Monomer. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 8, 11818–11826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Damayanti, D.; Wulandari, L.A.; Bagaskoro, A.; Rianjanu, A.; Wu, H.-S. Possibility Routes for Textile Recycling Technology. Polymers 2021, 13, 3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santos-Beneit, F.; Chen, L.M.; Bordel, S.; Frutos de la Flor, R.; García-Depraect, O.; Lebrero, R.; Rodriguez-Vega, S.; Muñoz, R.; Börner, R.A.; Börner, T. Screening Enzymes That Can Depolymerize Commercial Biodegradable Polymers: Heterologous Expression of Fusarium solani Cutinase in Escherichia coli. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malafatti-Picca, L.; Bucioli, E.C.; de Barros Chaves, M.R.; de Castro, A.M.; Valoni, É.; de Oliveira, V.M.; Marsaioli, A.J.; Govone, J.S.; de Franceschi de Angelis, D.; Brienzo, M.; et al. Fungal Screening for Potential PET Depolymerization. Polymers 2023, 15, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feijoo, P.; Marín, A.; Samaniego-Aguilar, K.; Sánchez-Safont, E.; Lagarón, J.M.; Gámez-Pérez, J.; Cabedo, L. Effect of the Presence of Lignin from Woodflour on the Compostability of PHA-Based Biocomposites: Disintegration, Biodegradation and Microbial Dynamics. Polymers 2023, 15, 2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Egan, J.; Salmon, S. Strategies and progress in synthetic textile fiber biodegradability. SN Appl. Sci. 2022, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Azcona, J.; Olguín, C.; Durán, A.; Fernández-Rodríguez, J. Approach to anaerobic bio-degradation of natural and synthetic fabrics: Physico-chemical study of the alteration processes. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 342, 118366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marqués-Calvo, M.S.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M.; Kint, D.P.R.; Bou, J.J.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Enzymatic and microbial biodegradability of poly(ethylene terephthalate) copolymers containing nitrated units. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohanan, N.; Montazer, Z.; Sharma, P.; Levin, D. Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bianchi, S.; Bartoli, F.; Bruni, C.; Fernandez-Avila, C.; Rodriguez-Turienzo, L.; Mellado-Carretero, J.; Spinelli, D.; Coltelli, M.-B. Opportunities and Limitations in Recycling Fossil Polymers from Textiles. Macromol 2023, 3, 120–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, P.-Y.; Feng, R.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, J.-H. Recycling and Reutilization of Waste Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics: Current Status and Prospects. Polymers 2023, 15, 3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Klose, L.; Meyer-Heydecke, N.; Wongwattanarat, S.; Chow, J.; Pérez García, P.; Carré, C.; Streit, W.; Antranikian, G.; Romero, A.M.; Liese, A. Towards Sustainable Recycling of Epoxy-Based Polymers: Approaches and Challenges of Epoxy Biodegradation. Polymers 2023, 15, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Wang, D. Research Progress on Fiber-Reinforced Recycled Brick Aggregate Concrete: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ragaert, K.; Delva, L.; Geem, K.V. Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 24–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boondaeng, A.; Keabpimai, J.; Srichola, P.; Vaithanomsat, P.; Trakunjae, C.; Niyomvong, N. Optimization of Textile Waste Blends of Cotton and PET by Enzymatic Hydrolysis with Reusable Chemical Pretreatment. Polymers 2023, 15, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Banerjee, A.; Chatterjee, K.; and Madras, G. Enzymatic degradation of polymers: A brief review. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghoneim, M.; Yehia, A.; Yehia, S.; Abuzaid, W. Shear Strength of Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials 2020, 13, 4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maraveas, C. Production of Sustainable and Biodegradable Polymers from Agricultural Waste. Polymers 2020, 12, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Strik, D.P.B.T.B.; Heusschen, B. Microbial Recycling of Polylactic Acid Food Packaging Waste into Carboxylates via Hydrolysis and Mixed-Culture Fermentation. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Teacă, C.-A.; Shahzad, A.; Duceac, I.A.; Tanasă, F. The Re-/Up-Cycling of Wood Waste in Wood–Polymer Composites (WPCs) for Common Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agüero, Á.; Corral Perianes, E.; Abarca de las Muelas, S.S.; Lascano, D.; de la Fuente García-Soto, M.d.M.; Peltzer, M.A.; Balart, R.; Arrieta, M.P. Plasticized Mechanical Recycled PLA Films Reinforced with Microbial Cellulose Particles Obtained from Kombucha Fermented in Yerba Mate Waste. Polymers 2023, 15, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bai, Z.; Liu, Y.; Su, T.; Wang, Z. Effect of Hydroxyl Monomers on the Enzymatic Degradation of Poly(ethylene succinate), Poly(butylene succinate), and Poly(hexylene succinate). Polymers 2018, 10, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Navone, L.; Moffitt, K.; Hansen, K.A.; Blinco, J.; Payne, A.; Speight, R. Closing the textile loop: Enzymatic fibre separation and recycling of wool/polyester fabric blends. Waste Manag. 2020, 102, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Egan, J.; Wang, S.; Shen, J.; Baars, O.; Moxley, G.; Salmon, S. Enzymatic textile fiber separation for sustainable waste processing, Resources. Environ. Sustain. 2023, 13, 100118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tiso, T.; Narancic, T.; Wei, R.; Pollet, E.; Beagan, N.; Schröder, K.; Honak, A.; Jiang, M.; Kenny, S.T.; Wierckx, N.; et al. Towards bio-upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Metab. Eng. 2021, 66, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gadaleta, G.; De Gisi, S.; Sorrentino, A.; Sorrentino, L.; Notarnicola, M.; Kuchta, K.; Picuno, C.; Oliviero, M. Effect of Cellulose-Based Bioplastics on Current LDPE Recycling. Materials 2023, 16, 4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mukherjee, A.; Koller, M. Microbial PolyHydroxyAlkanoate (PHA) Biopolymers—Intrinsically Natural. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gabisa, E.W.; Ratanatamskul, C.; Gheewala, S.H. Recycling of Plastics as a Strategy to Reduce Life Cycle GHG Emission, Microplastics and Resource Depletion. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, R.; Zimmermann, W. Microbial enzymes for the recycling of recalcitrant petroleum-based plastics: How far are we? Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1308–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schiros, T.N.; Mosher, C.Z.; Zhu, Y.; Bina, T.; Gomez, V.; Lee, C.L.; Lu, H.H.; Obermeyer, A.C. Bioengineering textiles across scales for a sustainable circular economy. Chem 2021, 7, 2913–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zimmermann, W. Biocatalytic recycling of polyethylene terephthalate plastic. R. Soc. 2020, 378, 20190273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yoshida, S.; Hiraga, K.; Takehana, T.; Taniguchi, I.; Yamaji, H.; Maeda, Y.; Toyohara, K.; Miyamoto, K.; Kimura, Y.; Oda, K. bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 2016, 351, 1196–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fazli, A.; Rodrigue, D. Sustainable Reuse of Waste Tire Textile Fibers (WTTF) as Reinforcements. Polymers 2022, 14, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ruuth, E.; Sanchis-Sebastiá, M.; Larsson, P.T.; Teleman, A.; Jiménez-Quero, A.; Delestig, S.; Sahlberg, V.; Salén, P.; Sanchez Ortiz, M.; Vadher, S.; et al. Reclaiming the Value of Cotton Waste Textiles: A New Improved Method to Recycle Cotton Waste Textiles via Acid Hydrolysis. Recycling 2022, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Opálková Šišková, A.; Pleva, P.; Hrůza, J.; Frajová, J.; Sedlaříková, J.; Peer, P.; Kleinová, A.; Janalíková, M. Reuse of Textile Waste to Production of the Fibrous Antibacterial Membrane with Filtration Potential. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vukoje, M.; Itrić Ivanda, K.; Kulčar, R.; Marošević Dolovski, A. Spectroscopic Stability Studies of Pressure Sensitive Labels Facestock Made from Recycled Post-Consumer Waste and Agro-Industrial By-Products. Forests 2021, 12, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xanthopoulou, E.; Chrysafi, I.; Polychronidis, P.; Zamboulis, A.; Bikiaris, D.N. Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Hemp-Fiber-Reinforced Recycled HDPE Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, G.; Tošić, N.; de la Fuente, A. Recycling of Macro-Synthetic Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and Properties of New Concretes with Recycled Aggregate and Recovered Fibers. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Yu, X.; Guo, Y.; Ren, Y.; Liu, X. Preparation of flame retardant, smoke suppression and reinforced polyacrylonitrile composite fiber by using fully biomass intumescent flame retardant system and its sustainable recycle application. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2023, 173, 107705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, W.; Xiao, L.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Nie, X.; Chen, J. Bio-based epoxy vitrimer for recyclable and carbon fiber reinforced materials: Synthesis and structure-property relationship. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 227, 109575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, G.; Gao, J.; Ma, S.; Zhang, H. Efficient preparation of chemically crosslinked recyclable photodeformable azobenzene polymer fibers with high processability and reconstruction ability via a facile post-crosslinking method. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 139, 109998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthetic fiber recycling options.
Figure 1. Synthetic fiber recycling options.
Engproc 56 00181 g001
Figure 2. Microscopic images of 20% polyester/80% cotton fabric (a) and warp yarn (yellow and black polyester fibers cover the white cotton fibers) (b).
Figure 2. Microscopic images of 20% polyester/80% cotton fabric (a) and warp yarn (yellow and black polyester fibers cover the white cotton fibers) (b).
Engproc 56 00181 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope images of poly(ethylene succinate) (PES) polyester films degraded for 2, 4, and 10 h. Adapted with permission from Ref. [22], 2018, Bei et al.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope images of poly(ethylene succinate) (PES) polyester films degraded for 2, 4, and 10 h. Adapted with permission from Ref. [22], 2018, Bei et al.
Engproc 56 00181 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mamun, A.; Kuntz, F.; Golle, C.; Sabantina, L. Biotechnological Solutions for Recycling Synthetic Fibers. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-16301

AMA Style

Mamun A, Kuntz F, Golle C, Sabantina L. Biotechnological Solutions for Recycling Synthetic Fibers. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-16301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mamun, Al, Friederike Kuntz, Cornelia Golle, and Lilia Sabantina. 2023. "Biotechnological Solutions for Recycling Synthetic Fibers" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-16301

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop