Next Article in Journal
Agro–Industrial Waste Blends on the Mechanical Response of Selected Soils
Previous Article in Journal
Some Microbiological Characteristics of the Biofilm on the Surface of Pre-Production Pellets of Polypropylene Microplastics after Short Exposure in Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Irradiated Hazelnut (Corylus avellana): Identification and Dose Assessment Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy †

1
Radiation Dosimetry Department, National Institute for Standards (NIS), Ministry of Scientific Research, Giza 12211, Egypt
2
Basic Science Department, Faculty of Engineering, The British University in Egypt (BUE), El-Shorouk City 11837, Egypt
3
Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo 11787, Egypt
4
Egyptian Meteorological Authority, Kobri EL-Kobba, Cairo 11784, Egypt
5
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15241
Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
Food irradiation aims to eliminate biohazards such as pathogens, microbes, fungi, etc., as the identification of irradiated food and dose assessment ensures its safe use. Hazelnut is the most universal widespread nut and can be found as a whole fruit or as an ingredient in many food types. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) was used to identify irradiated hazelnut and assess radiation doses delivered to it using fractions of its kernel and/or shells. In this paper, parameters affecting the proper detection and evaluation of irradiated hazelnut kernels and shells are studied and analyzed, including the response to Cs-137 gamma rays, the effect of the change in microwave power and modulation amplitude values during EPR spectra acquisition, and the time dependence of the induced radicals. The stability study of the radiation-induced radicals suggests that it is better to perform EPR measurements for irradiated hazelnut during the first month following irradiation.

1. Introduction

Innovative technologies have recently arisen to guarantee the quality and safety of diverse food items in response to the rising worldwide need for food safety and preservation [1,2,3]. One such technology is the use of ionizing radiation for the preservation of food, which has drawn much attention due to its potential to increase shelf-life and control of dangerous pathogens [3,4]. Irradiated nuts have, however, come under close investigation about their safety and appropriateness for human consumption. In order to investigate the effects of ionizing radiation on nuts, scientists have turned to electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy [5,6,7].
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) utilizes the unpaired electrons resulted from irradiation to identify the irradiated food. EPR is an accurate and non-destructive method for the evaluation of radiation doses delivered during the irradiation of irradiated food goods, assuring the safety and quality of those products [8]. Through EPR spectroscopy, these free radicals may be identified and measured, providing a window into the probable alterations brought on by radiation [9,10].
The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) has approved EPR as a standard technique for the detection of irradiated food where it is considered in the European Standards EN 1787:2000 (for cellulose), EN13708:2001 (for crystalline sugar), and EN 1786:2001 (for bone) [11], the Codex Alimentarius Commission has ratified the European Standards [12,13]. According to the European standard, all cellulose containing food, even unirradiated samples, exhibit a single (central) signal in their EPR spectra at about g = 2.004, the genesis of the paramagnetic species has been the subject of various theories [10,14,15].
Hazelnut (Filbert) is a rich source of proteins, carbohydrates, unsaturated fatty acids, vitamins and essential minerals. Irradiation of hazelnut ensures the purity of possible pathogen and undesired microbes. [16]. It is of great importance to identify irradiated hazelnut, especially in cases of the absence of outer shells with a speed test; this helps the global hazelnut trade and ensures safe consumption.
This study aims to employ the EPR technique to identify irradiated hazelnut, aiming to finding a method for the evaluation of radiation doses delivered to the hazelnut shell and kernel.

2. Instruments, Materials, and Methods

2.1. Radiation Source and Radiation Dose Determination

Gamma radiation exposure was carried out by utilizing a Cesium-137 gamma source, model GB-150, created by the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited in April 1970, initially possessing an activity of 1000 curies. The measurement and assessment of the air kerma (Kair) were conducted following the guidelines outlined in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) code of practice TRS-(381). This assessment of Kair was executed using the secondary standard dosimetry system established by the National Institute of Standards (NIS) in Egypt. This system was calibrated at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The values of Kair were evaluated, with an associated expanded uncertainty of approximately 0.9% at a 95% confidence level (with a coverage factor of 2).
Additionally, exposure to high radiation doses was carried out utilizing a Cobalt-60 gamma-source (housed within an irradiation cell) situated at the National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), part of the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority. The radioactive source possessed an activity level of approximately 50,000 Ci, and the rate of dose delivery was approximately 4.0 kGy/h at the location where the samples were placed for irradiation. This irradiation process occurred at room temperature and utilized Perspex phantom irradiation capsules. The radiation doses delivered to the samples ranged from 0.5 to 10 kGy.

2.2. EPR Spectrometer

The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) setup employed in this study is the EMX-BRUKER system from Germany. This system is fitted with a 9.5 GHz microwave (X-band) Gunn-Oscillator Bridge with an automatic tuning feature. The configuration utilizes a rectangular resonator, specifically the 4102 ST cavity, which operates in the TE102 mode.

2.3. Hazelnut

Hazelnut (Corylus avellana) is the most popular nut in the world, especially in the Mediterranean region where it can be used alone or as a food additive. Corylus avellana is of the species Corylus, family of Betulaceae, order Fagales, and clade Rosids. Hazelnut fruit is composed of a soft kernel covered by a thin brown layer and lays inside a hard-smooth inedible outer shell, as shown schematically in Figure 1.

2.4. Sample Preparation

The shells of hazelnut were crushed gently until they became the form of fine grains, and kernels were extracted. Pedicel parts were not included in the sample; also, fibers were removed from the placental region of the shell. Regarding the kernels, they underwent a mechanical peeling process to remove their outer skin, followed by the extraction of the hilum portions. Subsequently, the inner flesh of the kernels was extracted and finely divided into small fragments. These small kernel pieces were then placed on a clean cellulose sheet (paper) for approximately 30 min in order to facilitate the removal of fatty substances.

2.5. Evaluation Method

The EPR measurements for hazelnut shells and kernels were conducted with the following parameters: a microwave power of 2.012 mW, a central field set at 344.8 mT, a sweep width of 50.0 mT, a time constant of 163.84 ms, and a conversion time of 81.92 ms. These parameters resulted in 1024 data points per spectrum, and the entire sweep took approximately 84 s. The modulation amplitudes were 1.9 mT for shells and 0.8 mT for kernels, with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz. To ensure signal accuracy, empty-tube spectra were recorded prior to recording the spectra of the hazelnut samples.
The acquired EPR spectra were calibrated to the peak-to-peak amplitude of a reference standard material (DPPH). This standard’s EPR spectra were recorded before and after each hazelnut sample spectrum to account for variations in the spectrometer’s sensitivity. The hazelnut shell samples weighed 0.08 ± 0.014 g, while the kernel samples weighed 0.07 ± 0.016 g. The intensity of EPR signals from each sample was normalized based on its mass. Each individual sample’s EPR spectrum was recorded three or more in successive scans, each consisting of a single scan (n = 1) [17,18].
Uncertainties associated to the delivered radiation doses were evaluated according to the ISO guide for the expression of uncertainties [19].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Spectral Features

Figure 2 represents three EPR spectra: (a) represents the EPR spectrum of an unirradiated hazelnut kernel, where it appears to have multiple numerous overlapped unresolved signals close to each other and forming a broad hump-like structure. These unresolved signals might be attributed to a number of fatty acid radicals existing natively in the kernels of hazelnut. Spectrum (b) is of a 10 kGy gamma-irradiated hazelnut kernel, where a singlet (Sb) can be observed at gb = 2.00981, and peak-to-peak line width (WPP) of gb~1.0 mT; this signal might be attributed to radicals of the polyene type, which are highly stable at different values of temperature. It was used as a dosimetric signal for irradiated kernels. In contrast to the unirradiated hazelnut kernel, unirradiated hazelnut shell shows no distinctive feature. On the other hand, irradiation of hazelnut shells possesses a sharp singlet (Sc) as can be seen in spectrum (c) which represents the irradiated (10 kGy) external shell of hazelnut, gc = 2.00979. Peak-to-peak line width (WPP) of gc is approximately ~0.8 mT. The singlet labeled as “gc” seems to be prevalent in the EPR spectra of various irradiated nuts like walnuts, pistachios, and peanuts. This occurrence might be linked to radicals originating from cellulose [20].

3.2. Microwave Power Saturation Behavior

Figure 3 illustrates how altering the microwave power impacts the peak-to-peak amplitude (HPP) of both the hazelnut kernel signal (Sb) and the shell signal (Sc). As depicted in the figure, the Sb demonstrates a linear growth until reaching a microwave power of 4 mW. Afterward, saturation begins, leading to a nonlinear rise in HPP that persists until the upper limit of the investigated range (160 mW).
For Sb, HPP increases linearly up to 1.01 mW microwave power, beyond this value saturation in HPP can be noticed easily till reaching the maximum value at microwave power of 25.0 mW, where HPP starts to decrease until the end of the studied range.

3.3. Effect of Modulation Amplitude

Figure 4 represents the impact of the change in modulation amplitude on the peak-to-peak amplitude (HPP) of Sb and Sc. From this figure, HPP increases as the modulation amplitude increases for both cases: kernels (represented by circles) and shells (represented by diamonds) indicate that the linear behavior cannot be guaranteed after the value of 0.2 mT modulation amplitude where saturation behavior dominates.

3.4. Time Dependence

The time dependence of HPP for both kernel and shell signals was monitored closely over the first six hours after irradiation terminates in order to trace the dynamics of the radiation-induced radicals. During the first hour after irradiation, HPP was stable within 2.4% for kernels and 0.80% for shells, while during the second hour it was stable within 2.7% and 1.6% and within 2.6% and 2.7% during the following four hours after irradiation for kernels and shells, respectively, time dependence for radiation-induced radicals in hazelnut kernel and shell over the first six hours following the irradiation process is plotted in Figure 5.
For longer time periods, the study of time dependence gives an idea about the stability of the radiation-induced radicals, which enables the detection and identification of the irradiated hazelnut. Figure 6 represents the change in HPP for both of Sb and Sc over 38 days following irradiation, where the diamonds denote the hazelnut kernel and the circles denote the shell. Dramatic decrease in HPP for Sb and Sc to 72.9% and 76.7% of their original values was noticed after 9 days following irradiation, and to 46.9% and 51.3% after 23 days, while at the end of the study interval (after 38 days), HPP decreased to 42.9% and 42.6% for Sb and Sc, respectively.

3.5. Response to Different Radiation Doses

Figure 7 illustrates the response of hazelnut shells and kernels to varying radiation doses. Within the graph, the HPP values for both Sb and Sc were plotted against the radiation doses delivered to the hazelnuts over the range of 0.5 to 10 kGy. Evidently, as the radiation dose increases, both HPP (Sb) and HPP (Sc) exhibit an increasing behavior. Notably, the ratio between the response of HPP (Sb) and HPP (Sc) was noticed to fluctuate from 19.3% to 24.3% based on the dose level. This confirms the sensitivity of hazelnut shells to ionizing radiation compared to kernels.
Response to ionizing radiation data was fitted using the power fit according to the equation: ln Y = B. ln X + A, where B and A are constants as follows: for kernels: A = 2.41 and B = 0.385, where values for shells are: A = 3.93 and B = 0.422.

4. Conclusions

EPR is a powerful tool for the identification of irradiated hazelnut and also for the estimation of irradiation doses through samples of hazelnut shells and kernels. Hazelnut shells are much more sensitive to radiation than kernels (four to five times) and can give more reliable results; however, kernels can be used for the estimation of irradiation doses in cases of the absence of hazelnut shells. Radiation-induced EPR signals (for kernel and shell) can persist for more than a month despite the predictable decay; however, it is recommended to record the date of irradiation in order to perform necessary corrections and to perform the test within one month after the irradiation process. More irradiated food items are to be identified using EPR in the future.

Author Contributions

A.M. (Ahmed Maghraby): methodology, validation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. E.S.: methodology, writing—original draft. S.A.: methodology and data curation. A.M. (Abdo Mansour): methodology. E.M.: conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Roberts, P.B. The Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Foods. In Encyclopedia of Food and Safety, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kujawa, M. Safety and nutritional adequacy of irradiated food. 161 Seiten. 18 Tab. World Health Organization, Geneva 1994. Preis: 42,–sfr. Food/Nahr. 1995, 39, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grolichová, M.; Dvořák, P.; Musilová, H. Employing Ionizing Radiation to Enhance Food Safety—A Review. Acta Vet. Brno 2004, 73, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bandyopadhyay, N.C.; More, V.; Tripathi, J.; Gautam, S. Gamma radiation treatment to ensure microbial safety of ready to bake (RTB) vegetable toppings/ fillers and retain their nutritional qualities during cold storage. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 176, 108939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prasuna, C.L.; Chakradhar, R.; Rao, J.; Gopal, N. EPR as an analytical tool in assessing the mineral nutrients and irradiated food products–vegetables. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2008, 71, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stachowicz, W.; Burlinska, G.; Michalik, J. EPR detection of foods preserved with ionizing radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1998, 52, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stachowicz, W.; Burlińska, G.; Michalik, J.; Dziedzic-Gocławska, A.; Ostrowski, K. The EPR detection of foods preserved with the use of ionizing radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1995, 46, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maghraby, A. Uncertainty attributed to signal averaging in a single averaged alanine EPR spectrum for low-dose applications. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2011, 143, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shukla, A.K. Electron Spin Resonance in Food Science; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aoudé-Werner, D.; Straub, I.; Zumsteeg, V.; Kuntz, F. Identification of bleached and irradiated walnuts and hazelnuts by ESR spectroscopy. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 173, 108882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. EN 13708:2001; Foodstuffs of Irradiated Food Containing Crystalline Sugar by ESR Spectroscopy. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
  12. Poli, S. The European Community and the Adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Eur. Law J. 2004, 10, 613–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. D’Oca, M.C.; Bartolotta, A. Detection of Irradiated Food and Evaluation of the Given Dose by Electron Spin Resonance, Thermoluminescence, and Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Analysis. In Food Control Biosecurity; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 343–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tomaiuolo, M.; Mangiacotti, M.; Trotta, G.; Marchesani, G.; Chiappinelli, A.; Chiaravalle, A.E. Identification of X-ray irradiated walnuts by ESR spectroscopy. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 150, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sanyal, B.; Sajilata, M.G.; Chatterjee, S.; Singhal, R.S.; Variyar, P.S.; Kamat, M.Y.; Sharma, A. Identification of Irradiated Cashew Nut by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8987–8991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Maghraby, A.; Salama, E.; Sami, A.; Mansour, A.; El-Sayed, M. Identification and dosimetry of irradiated walnuts (Juglans regia) using EPR. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2012, 167, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maghraby, A.M.; Mansour, A.; Abdel-Fattah, A.A. Taurine-EVA copolymer-paraffin rods dosimeters for EPR high-dose radiation dosimetry. Nukleonika 2014, 59, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maghraby, A.M. Applying the conventional moving average filter for estimation of low radiation doses using EPR spectroscopy: Benefits and drawbacks. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2014, 737, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raffi, J.; Yordanov, N.; Chabane, S.; Douifi, L.; Gancheva, V.; Ivanova, S. Identification of irradiation treatment of aromatic herbs, spices and fruits by electron paramagnetic resonance and thermoluminescence. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2000, 56, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008; Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM:1995). ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
Figure 1. Hazelnut major structural features.
Figure 1. Hazelnut major structural features.
Engproc 56 00017 g001
Figure 2. Spectra of unirradiated kernel, (a) 10 kGy gamma-irradiated kernel, (b) and hazelnut shell (c).
Figure 2. Spectra of unirradiated kernel, (a) 10 kGy gamma-irradiated kernel, (b) and hazelnut shell (c).
Engproc 56 00017 g002
Figure 3. The correlation between the square root of the microwave power (mW1/2) and the peak-to-peak heights (HPP) for Sb (represented by circles) and Sc (represented by diamonds).
Figure 3. The correlation between the square root of the microwave power (mW1/2) and the peak-to-peak heights (HPP) for Sb (represented by circles) and Sc (represented by diamonds).
Engproc 56 00017 g003
Figure 4. Effect of magnetic field modulation amplitude on peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb) (circles), and HPP (Sc) (diamonds).
Figure 4. Effect of magnetic field modulation amplitude on peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb) (circles), and HPP (Sc) (diamonds).
Engproc 56 00017 g004
Figure 5. Short-term time dependence of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) over the first six hours immediately after irradiation.
Figure 5. Short-term time dependence of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) over the first six hours immediately after irradiation.
Engproc 56 00017 g005
Figure 6. Long-term time dependence of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) over the first 30 days following the day of irradiation.
Figure 6. Long-term time dependence of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) over the first 30 days following the day of irradiation.
Engproc 56 00017 g006
Figure 7. Response of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) (arbitrary units) to different radiation doses over the range (0.5:10 kGy).
Figure 7. Response of peak-to-peak heights, HPP (Sb), and HPP (Sc) (arbitrary units) to different radiation doses over the range (0.5:10 kGy).
Engproc 56 00017 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maghraby, A.; Salama, E.; Mansour, A.; Anwar, S.; Mahmoud, E. Irradiated Hazelnut (Corylus avellana): Identification and Dose Assessment Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15241

AMA Style

Maghraby A, Salama E, Mansour A, Anwar S, Mahmoud E. Irradiated Hazelnut (Corylus avellana): Identification and Dose Assessment Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maghraby, Ahmed, Elsayed Salama, Abdo Mansour, Samy Anwar, and Elsayed Mahmoud. 2023. "Irradiated Hazelnut (Corylus avellana): Identification and Dose Assessment Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15241

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop