Next Article in Journal
Decision Support from Financial Disclosures with Deep Reinforcement Learning Considering Different Countries and Exchange Rates
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical Analysis of Handover Process Performance in a Cellular Mobile Network in the City of Quito, Ecuador
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Toward the Development of Plasmonic Biosensors to Realize Point-of-Care Tests for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria †

1
Department of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15277
Published: 6 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
Optical fiber biosensors can be used to develop point-of-care tests (POCTs) for detecting viruses and bacteria in several matrices. In particular, the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and localized SPR phenomena (LSPR) can be excited by exploiting low-cost and small-size optical fiber chips. Generally, SPR or LSPR sensors are realized using several kinds of modified optical fibers (silica, plastic, or specialty) or by exploiting other optical waveguides (e.g., slab, spoon-shaped waveguides, etc.). More specifically, optical fiber sensors can be classified as intrinsic or extrinsic. In the “optical fiber intrinsic sensors”, the sensing area is realized in the optical fiber directly, such as in the case of plasmonic platforms based on D-shaped plastic optical fibers (POFs), tapered optical fibers, U-bend POFs, or light-diffusing fibers (LDFs). By contrast, when an optical fiber is used as a mere waveguide allowing for the launch of light to the sensing region and its collection, it is defined as an extrinsic optical fiber sensor, like in the case of the plasmonic sensors realized by Cennamo et al. using POFs combined with spoon-shaped waveguides, 3D-printed platforms, bacterial cellulose waveguides, nanogratings, and InkJet-printed chips. To realize optical biosensor chips for the detection of viruses and bacteria, both intrinsic and extrinsic plasmonic POF sensors can be efficiently combined with receptors specific for membrane proteins, either biological (e.g., antibodies, aptamers, enzymes, etc.) or synthetic (e.g., molecularly imprinted polymers), to build groundbreaking POCTs.

1. Introduction

Immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for small, inexpensive, and easy-to-use devices useful to detect the virus on site and with the capability of transmitting statistical data over the Internet, POCTs connected to the Internet began to raise significant interest among the medical community [1]. In fact, during a pandemic emergency, these technologies can give a more accurate view of the state of emergency and improve and speed up its management.
Recently, optical biosensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have been developed for several applications [2,3]. In particular, SPR probes and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) receptors were successfully tested [4,5] for several bio/chemical applications, such as for SARS-CoV-2 detection in several matrices [6]. Owing to the method’s high sensitivity, the virus can be detected even in diluted samples. The proposed POCT for SARS-CoV-2 detection reported in [6] can detect the presence of the virus in a few minutes and transmit the outcome to a platform via the Internet, facilitating the generation of automatic statistics useful for pandemic monitoring and management. Since this POCT also allows for the quantitative measures of SARS-CoV-2, it can represent a valid tool for monitoring COVID-19 patients’ treatment [6]. In particular, as shown in the outline of Figure 1, an SPR-POF probe [7] coupled with a specific MIP nanolayer [6] has been designed and tested for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 via its spike protein with the possibility of transmitting the experimental data obtained in real time [8].
Concerning the molecular recognition element (MRE), it is important to mention the possibility of using several specific MIPs (imprinted for different substances) in order to realize a versatile sensor system based on the same optical platform covered with a “programmable” MIP layer, as outlined in Figure 2. So, the potential of the proposed POCT is that it can be quickly updated/developed for a new pandemic emergency or different types of pathogens or viruses of interest. The reprogramming of MIPs is possible because the synthesis process involves copolymerization between appropriate functional monomers and a crosslinking agent in the presence of the target molecule [4,5,9,10,11].
This work involves a mini-review of the capabilities of POF sensors for the detection of viruses and bacteria in POCTs.

2. POCT: SPR-POF-MIP Chips and Experimental Setups

The plasmonic POF-based sensor platforms and the setup used to carry out this POCT were manufactured by Moresense srl (Spectra 340, Moresense srl, Milan, Italy). Figure 3a shows an image of the SPR-POF probe covered by the specific MIP layer, and the POCT device is illustrated in Figure 3b. A developed software tool (Moresense Capture Spectrum Data ver. 2.3) was used to acquire and process the experimental data of the POCT. This tool offers the possibility to connect the POCT to the Internet.

3. SARS-CoV-2 Detection in UTM

A method for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein and the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been reported in [6,8], and this was used here to demonstrate the capabilities of the POF-based bio/chemical sensors and the proposed sensing approach.
Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs positive and negative for COVID-19 were collected to carry out these measurements [6,8]. In particular, the previously positive samples were analyzed with the proposed POCT and in parallel with the RT-PCR technique (gold standard).
Figure 4a reports the experimental results obtained using the SPR-POF-MIP sensor with real SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in a UTM (universal transport medium) [6]. Each experimental value is the result of an average of five successive acquisitions, and the error bar shows the standard deviation. Figure 4b shows the SPR spectra of a positive NP swab in UTM diluted with a physiological solution at different dilution factors [6]. In this way, it was possible to show that quantitative measurements of SARS-CoV-2 can be carried out. Using the UTM, shifts in the resonance wavelength were found for dilutions with ratios less than 1:10. The same samples were tested using RT-PCR and were positive only when diluted at a ratio of 1:2 (with a physiological solution).

4. Conclusions

The proposed plasmonic POF-based POCT, aimed at detecting SARS-CoV-2, proved to be highly sensitive in a real scenario. Its operation proved effective in various real matrices, and the measurement system used is cheap, has small dimensions, and is connected to the Internet.
Moreover, it should be noted that what is presented here for SARS-CoV-2 detection is only a proof of concept to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed POCT. However, it is possible to simply generalize this approach for other viruses or bacteria by reprogramming the MIP.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; methodology, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; validation, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; formal analysis, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; investigation, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; resources, N.C. and L.Z.; data curation, F.A., C.M., I.T., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.A., I.T., C.M., L.P.R., N.C. and L.Z.; supervision, L.Z. and N.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Regione Campania for the BETTER Project–POR. FESR CAMPANIA 2014–2020 program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, Y.R.; Cao, Q.D.; Hong, Z.S.; Tan, Y.Y.; Cheng, S.D.; Jin, H.J.; Tan, K.S.; Wang, D.Y.; Yan, Y. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak—An update on the status. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nguyen, H.H.; Park, J.; Kang, S.; Kim, M. Surface Plasmon Resonance: A Versatile Technique for Biosensor Applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 10481–10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gandhi, M.S.A.; Chu, S.; Senthilnathan, K.; Babu, P.R.; Nakkeeran, K.; Qia, L. Recent Advances in Plasmonic Sensor-Based Fiber Optic Probes for Biological Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gupta, B.; Shrivastav, A.; Usha, S. Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Fiber Optic Sensors Utilizing Molecular Imprinting. Sensors 2016, 16, 1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cennamo, N.; Pesavento, M.; Zeni, L. A review on simple and highly sensitive plastic optical fiber probes for bio-chemical sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 331, 129393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cennamo, N.; D’Agostino, G.; Perri, C.; Arcadio, F.; Chiaretti, G.; Parisio, E.M.; Camarlinghi, G.; Vettori, C.; Di Marzo, F.; Cennamo, R.; et al. Proof of Concept for a Quick and Highly Sensitive On-Site Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Plasmonic Optical Fibers and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Sensors 2021, 21, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cennamo, N.; Massarotti, D.; Conte, L.; Zeni, L. Low cost sensors based on SPR in a plastic optical fiber for biosensor implementation. Sensors 2011, 11, 11752–11760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cennamo, N.; D’Agostino, G.; Pasquardini, L.; Arcadio, F.; Perri, C.; Coppola, N.; Angelillo, I.F.; Altucci, L.; Di Marzo, F.; Parisio, E.M.; et al. Quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 virions in aqueous mediums by IoT optical fiber sensors. Results Opt. 2021, 5, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haupt, K. Molecularly imprinted polymers in analytical chemistry. Analyst 2001, 126, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Haupt, K.; Linares, A.V.; Bompart, M.; Bui, B.T.S. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Top. Curr. Chem. 2011, 325, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  11. BelBruno, J.J. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 94–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Scheme of the sensor to detect SARS-CoV-2 with the possibility of transmitting and storing the data in a cloud via the Internet [6,8].
Figure 1. Scheme of the sensor to detect SARS-CoV-2 with the possibility of transmitting and storing the data in a cloud via the Internet [6,8].
Engproc 56 00113 g001
Figure 2. Outline of an SPR-POF platform combined with several MIP layers [6].
Figure 2. Outline of an SPR-POF platform combined with several MIP layers [6].
Engproc 56 00113 g002
Figure 3. Images of (a) the SPR-POF-MIP chip and POCT device (b), both manufactured by Moresense srl (Milan, Italy) in collaboration with the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelly (Naples, Italy).
Figure 3. Images of (a) the SPR-POF-MIP chip and POCT device (b), both manufactured by Moresense srl (Milan, Italy) in collaboration with the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelly (Naples, Italy).
Engproc 56 00113 g003
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the positive and negative responses in UTM obtained using the POCT (confirmed with RT-PCR); (b) SPR spectra of dilutions of the positive sample in UTM at different ratios (the SARS-CoV-2-positive result was obtained at the 36th RT-PCR cycle). Samples were diluted using a physiological solution.
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the positive and negative responses in UTM obtained using the POCT (confirmed with RT-PCR); (b) SPR spectra of dilutions of the positive sample in UTM at different ratios (the SARS-CoV-2-positive result was obtained at the 36th RT-PCR cycle). Samples were diluted using a physiological solution.
Engproc 56 00113 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arcadio, F.; Tavoletta, I.; Marzano, C.; Renzullo, L.P.; Cennamo, N.; Zeni, L. Toward the Development of Plasmonic Biosensors to Realize Point-of-Care Tests for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15277

AMA Style

Arcadio F, Tavoletta I, Marzano C, Renzullo LP, Cennamo N, Zeni L. Toward the Development of Plasmonic Biosensors to Realize Point-of-Care Tests for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arcadio, Francesco, Ines Tavoletta, Chiara Marzano, Luca Pasquale Renzullo, Nunzio Cennamo, and Luigi Zeni. 2023. "Toward the Development of Plasmonic Biosensors to Realize Point-of-Care Tests for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15277

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop