Next Article in Journal
Realism-Oriented Design, Verification, and Validation of Novel Robust Navigation Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Scalability, Resiliency, and Load Balancing in Software-Defined Networking
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Comparative Analysis between Water Purification Systems †

Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15335
Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
The global crisis regarding inadequate safe drinking water affects millions due to factors like poor infrastructure, environmental degradation, and natural disasters. To address this, water purification technologies, including filters that eliminate bacteria, viruses, and heavy metals, are crucial. The thesis focuses on analyzing five water purification methods, considering their effectiveness and competence. It examines various water sources in Bangladesh, highlighting issues like excessive microorganisms and contaminants in tap water. The study aims to promote affordable, sustainable purification systems, acknowledging the drawbacks of certain technologies. Findings reveal issues with tap and boiled water while other methods effectively remove contaminants.

1. Introduction

The 2021 Report from UNICEF/WHO expressed that 61.7 M people in Bangladesh lack essential hygiene facilities. Billions of people worldwide will not have access to safely managed drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene services by 2030, as reported by WHO. The findings of international investigations show that, while the availability of safe water substantially decreases the possibility of diarrheal disorders and, consequently, death, the lack of sanitation significantly decrease this beneficial effect [1]. Existing research studies deal with the capacity of water purifiers to kill germs, but this research deals with the capacity of filters to retain electrolytes. Through its multi-stage series of filters, the alkaline water system provides the maximum level of filtration in the gravity filter, also known as the candle filter, producing clean, mineralized alkaline water. The pureit water filter uses a multi-stage purification process involving a pre-sediment filter, an activated carbon filter, a post-carbon sediment filter and a germkill chamber.
Though DWASA has plans to set up 300 units of water ATMs which are also known as water vending machines, its initial goal was to install 100 water ATMs for low-income people [2]. When using the ATM, one has to deposit a refundable amount of BDT 200 to the water booth’s operator and collect a card from them. When the card is inserted, water starts flowing and when the card is polled out, the water flow stops. Reverse osmosis is a type of membrane-enabled system that can segregate clean water from dissolved solids of feed stream and generate, permeate as well as reject a stream [3]. Straining, interception, inertial forces, particle setting, diffusion and fluid dynamics forces are the transportation mechanism of the candle filter, commonly known as the gravity filter [4]. Pureit was originally produced by Hindustani Unilever. Based on Ultraviolet and a reverse osmosis mechanism, it did not require electricity to operate [5]. For biotoxicity assessment, more sophisticated processes have to be applied to ensure the quality of treated water. A frequently used technique for treating recalcitrant pollutants is an advanced oxidation process [6]. Though binary results show the highest adsorption capacity for toluene, the differential adsorption capacity of benzene and toluene can be used to design purification processes to target specific contaminants in groundwater [7].
Fenton’s reagent, a solution of hydrogen peroxide and an iron catalyst, can produce hydroxyl radicals, which are very reactive and can break down humic acid into smaller molecules [8]. Humic acid can affect color, taste and odor of water and can react with chlorine and other disinfectants. The use of iron oxide magnetic nanocatalyst can be introduced as an improved treatment process, including reduced mass transfer limitations, lower energy consumption, and enhanced catalyst selectivity [9].
The existing research deals with the cost and competence required to purify water from pollutants and the availability of water treatment technology like boiling, candle filter, reverse osmosis, vending machine and pureit filter (germkill technology). In this paper, we will try to demonstrate the efficiency of the treatment systems with regard to removing heavy metals and retaining electrolytes.

2. Methodology

The overall approach of this research was decided based on the analysis of collected data. The research was basically experimental. The parameters were tested at the Environmental Engineering Laboratory of Civil engineering Department, BUET. The conclusion was derived from a single sample test. The phases of this research are shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Location of Sampling Point

Study area selection is the primary and most significant phase of conducting research. WASA ground water, water for boiling purpose, water sample from WASA water vending machine and water samples after filtering through RO, candle and pureit filter, all were collected from Dhaka WASA mod zone 3.

2.2. Sample Collection

Six samples were collected for the study. The date and location of the sample collection were carefully recorded.
Samples which were selected for experiment:
  • Boiled Water.
  • WASA Tap Water.
  • Candle Filter.
  • Reverse Osmosis.
  • Water Vending Machine.
  • Pureit Filter (Germkill Technology).

2.3. Boiled Water

Water was boiled in the vessel by heating on a stove with the temperature increased to around 100 degrees Celsius. It was kept in the vessel so that the heavier suspended solids may be sedimented overnight.

2.4. WASA Supply Water

WASA ground water was collected from household taps for testing purposes on 21 August 2022.

2.5. WASA Water Booth

The water sample was collected from the WASA vending machine on 1 December 2022.
The source of the sample was Prominent Housing WASA water booth as shown in Figure 2.

2.6. Candle Filter

The water sample from the Candle filter (gravity filter) as shown in Figure 3 was collected from the home of an inhabitant of Mohammadpur, Dhaka, which falls into DWASA mod zone 3, on 3 December 2022. The name of the company from which the Candle filter was purchased was Eva Water filter.

2.7. Reverse Osmosis

Water sample from reverse osmosis filter was collected from the home of an inhabitant of DWASA mods zone 3 on 21 August 2022. The filter was produced by the company Aqua Shine.

2.8. Pureit Filter

A water sample was collected for testing purpose from the pureit filter produced by Unilever Bangladesh. It was collected on 3 December 2022. The pureit water filter uses ultraviolet technology as one of its purification methods. Ozone-based advanced oxidation technologies provide an efficient process through which to degrade micropollutants from the aquatic environment, emphasizing the potential application of these techniques in water treatment and purification processes [10].

2.9. Physicochemical Testing

Testing of heavy metals such as lead, chromium, cadmium and some essential elements, namely calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium, were carried out at the Environmental Engineering Laboratory of Civil Engineering Department at BUET. Their expert knowledge of DWASA drinking water characteristics was used to choose these criteria. The parameters, testing method, equipment and operating condition of heavy metal test and electrolyte test are listed in the Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

The Bangladesh Standard Testing Institution (BSTI) created and published the Bangladesh Standard Specification for Drinking Water (BDS 1240:1989) to regulate the quality of drinking water. Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the lead, sodium, calcium, potassium and magnesium respectively concentration in milligrams per liter unit of each sample in compliance with Environmental Conservation Rules (ECR,23) and WHO drinking water criteria.

3.1. Presence of Heavy Metals after Filtering

3.1.1. Lead

According to ECR’23 and WHO standards, the lead concentration limit for safe drinking water is 0.05mg/L. The lead concentration was tested in the environment laboratory using the equipment Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAAS, which had a minimum detection level of 0.001 mg/L. As we can see from Figure 4, only WASA tap water exceeded the lead concentration limit set by ECR’97 and the WHO standard. Figure 9 shows the lead removing efficiency of each water purification technology.

3.1.2. Chromium

The ECR’23 and WHO guideline value for chromium in drinking water is a maximum of 0.05 mg/L. Chromium was tested using the equipment Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAAS, which had a minimum detection level 0.001 mg/L. From Table 2, we can see that none of the samples have exceeded the limit of chromium concentration set by ECR’23 or WHO.

3.1.3. Cadmium

According to ECR’23, the maximum allowable limit of cadmium is 0.005 mg/L and according to WHO, it is 0.003 mg/L. The equipment used for the cadmium test was Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAAS, which had a minimum detection level for cadmium of 0.1 mg/L. As we can see from Table 3, all the samples which were tested had a cadmium concentration below the minimum detection level.

3.2. Efficiency of Retaining Electrolytes

3.2.1. Calcium

According to WHO guidelines, the minimum desired level for Ca concentration is 75 mg/L to a maximum permissible level of 200 mg/L. From Figure 10, we observe that none of the water samples had Ca concentration close to the desired concentration. So the water which is purified using the candle, RO or pureit filter might not fulfill the calcium requirement expected from water.

3.2.2. Magnesium

After analyzing the data, we can observe from Figure 11, that none of the samples are even close to the limit specified for magnesium concentration by WHO, which is 50–200 mg/L.

3.2.3. Potassium

From Figure 12, we see that only the RO filter has a potassium concentration that exceeds the limit set by the Bangladesh standard, which is 12 mg/L. As for the rest of the samples, the potassium concentration is far below the desired level.

3.2.4. Sodium

From Figure 13, we see that none of the samples contain a sodium concentration that exceeds the limit set by ECR’23 or WHO guidelines, which is 200 mg/L.

4. Conclusions

From our overall analysis, we can deduce that, for retaining essential elements, specifically potassium and sodium, the water vending machine shows the least effectiveness. In addition, the vending machine has low chromium-removing efficiency compared to other filters tested. Considering the efficiency of removing cadmium, chromium and lead, the reverse osmosis filter shows the best performance. However, it also removes a significant amount of electrolytes: calcium and magnesium, to be specific. To retain the essential elements and remove the harmful metals from the water samples, the pureit filter has proved to be the most balanced. Along with high lead-removing efficiency and a moderate cadmium-removing efficiency, the pureit filter also retains high percentages of sodium and potassium. Hence, water from the pureit filter is most recommended for safe consumption. The candle filter is the least efficient at removing lead; it also removes calcium and potassium from water to a great extent. A high concentration of sodium and magnesium was found in the filtrate of the candle filter, which is important for maintaining electrolyte concentration in water. If this filtrate water is used for industrial purposes rather than for drinking, then it might prevent pipes from corroding, as these minerals might contribute to form a protective scale on the inner surface of the pipes. Again, for drinking purposes, water has to be boiled prior to filtering through the candle filter to kill micro-organisms.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and approved by Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology for ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and confidentiality.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the contribution of Rowshan Mamtaz, whose insights were invaluable to the completion of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caldwell, B.K.; Smith, W.T.; Lokuge, K.; Ranmuthugala, G.; Dear, K.; Milton, A.H.; Sim, M.R.; Ng, J.C.; Mitra, S.N. Access to drinking-water and arsenicosis in Bangladesh. J. HealthPopul. Nutr. 2006, 24, 336. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mels, A.; Blokland, M.; Sterk, B.; Nazrul, S. Water Services Provision to Low-Income Communities in Dhaka-Assessment of the Partnership Approach by Dhaka Wasa. SSRN 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Garud, R.M.; Kore, S.V.; Kore, V.S.; Kulkarni, G.S. A Short Review on Process and Applications of Reverse Osmosis. Univers. J. Environ. Res. Technol. 2011, 1, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bema Boateng, R.; Fosu Senior, O. Dewatering of sludge for small scale and decentralized production of biochar. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, August 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rangan, V.K.; Sinha, M. Hindustan Unilever’s’ Pureit’Water Purifier; Harvard Business School: Boston, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumari, P.; Kumar, A. ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESS: A remediation technique for organic and non-biodegradable pollutant. Results Surf. Interfaces 2023, 11, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erto, A.; Chianese, S.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D. On the mechanism of benzene and toluene adsorption in single-compound and binary systems: Energetic interactions and competitive effects. Desalination Water Treat. 2017, 86, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, J.A.; Brown, L.M. Electro-oxidation of humic acids using platinum electrodes: An experimental approach and kinetic modeling. Water 2020, 12, 2250. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gallo-Cordova, A.; Castro, J.J.; Winkler, E.L.; Lima, E.; Zysler, R.D.; Morales, M.P. Improving degradation of real wastewaters with self-heating magnetic nanocatalysts. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Z.; Hosseinzadeh, S.; Wardenier, N.; Verheust, Y.; Chys, M.; Van Hulle, S. Combining ozone with UV and H2O2 for the degradation of micropollutants from different origins: Lab-scale analysis and optimization. Environ. Technol. 2018, 40, 3773–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Steps of research.
Figure 1. Steps of research.
Engproc 56 00110 g001
Figure 2. Water ATM booth prominent housing.
Figure 2. Water ATM booth prominent housing.
Engproc 56 00110 g002
Figure 3. Homebased Candle Filter.
Figure 3. Homebased Candle Filter.
Engproc 56 00110 g003
Figure 4. Lead concentration of the samples.
Figure 4. Lead concentration of the samples.
Engproc 56 00110 g004
Figure 5. Sodium Concentration In the Samples.
Figure 5. Sodium Concentration In the Samples.
Engproc 56 00110 g005
Figure 6. Calcium concentration in water samples.
Figure 6. Calcium concentration in water samples.
Engproc 56 00110 g006
Figure 7. Potassium concentration in water samples.
Figure 7. Potassium concentration in water samples.
Engproc 56 00110 g007
Figure 8. Magnesium concentration in samples.
Figure 8. Magnesium concentration in samples.
Engproc 56 00110 g008
Figure 9. Lead-removing efficiency of filters.
Figure 9. Lead-removing efficiency of filters.
Engproc 56 00110 g009
Figure 10. Percentage of calcium concentration compared to raw water.
Figure 10. Percentage of calcium concentration compared to raw water.
Engproc 56 00110 g010
Figure 11. Percentage of magnesium contained in the sample.
Figure 11. Percentage of magnesium contained in the sample.
Engproc 56 00110 g011
Figure 12. Percentage of potassium contained in the sample.
Figure 12. Percentage of potassium contained in the sample.
Engproc 56 00110 g012
Figure 13. Percentage of sodium retained in the purified water.
Figure 13. Percentage of sodium retained in the purified water.
Engproc 56 00110 g013
Table 1. Tested parameters, testing methods and equipment.
Table 1. Tested parameters, testing methods and equipment.
Heavy Metal TestElectrolyte Test
ParametersTesting MethodEquipmentOperating
condition
ParametersTesting MethodEquipmentOperating
Condition
LeadUSEPA 206.2
Rev 2.2 SM 3113 B
Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAASLead hollow cathode lampSodiumUSEPA 206.2;
SM 3113B
Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAASSodium
Hollow
Cathode Lamp
CrUSEPA 206.2; SM 3113BShimadzu AA-6800 FLAASChromium hollow cathode lampPotassimUSEPA 206.2;
SM 3113 B
Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAASPotassium
Hollow
Cathode Lamp
CdUSEPA 206.2; SM 3113 BShimadzu AA-6800 FLAASCadmium hollow cathode lampCalciumUSEPA 206.2;
SM 3113 B
Shimadzu AA-6800 FLAASCalcium
Hollow
Cathode Lamp
MagnesiumUSEPA 206.9;
SM 3113 B
Shimadzu AA-6800
FLAAS
Magnesium
Hollow
Cathode Lamp
Table 2. Chromium concentration of the samples.
Table 2. Chromium concentration of the samples.
ParametersConcentration (mg/L)
Boiled0.008
Wasa Tap WaterBelow MDL(0.001)
Vending Machine0.001
CandleBelow MDL(0.001)
RO FilterBelow MDL(0.001)
Pureit FilterBelow MDL(0.001)
Table 3. Cadmium concentration in the samples.
Table 3. Cadmium concentration in the samples.
ParametersConcentration (mg/L)
BoiledBelow MDL(0.1)
Wasa Tap WaterBelow MDL(0.1)
Vending MachineBelow MDL(0.1)
CandleBelow MDL(0.1)
RO FilterBelow MDL(0.1)
Pureit FilterBelow MDL(0.1)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Afzal, L. Comparative Analysis between Water Purification Systems. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15335

AMA Style

Afzal L. Comparative Analysis between Water Purification Systems. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Afzal, Lubaba. 2023. "Comparative Analysis between Water Purification Systems" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15335

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop