Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Structural Behavior of Composite Slim-Floor Beams with Openings in the Web
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation of Placemaking Attributes for Cultural Tourism in Historic Port Cities: Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Potential Applications of Different Forms of Recycled Plastics as Construction Materials—A Review †

Department of Civil Engineering, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Buildings, 24–26 October 2023; Available online: https://iocbd2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 53(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCBD2023-15177
Published: 24 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Online Conference on Buildings)

Abstract

:
The issue of waste plastic generation is a pressing global concern with several significant environmental, economic, and health implications. Various studies have explored the utilization of recycled plastics in construction, yet there is a notable gap in providing a comprehensive overview of recyclable plastic types, suitable recycling methodologies, and the range of products tailored to specific applications. Thus, the aim of the current literature review was to achieve a thorough review of the literature on the current use of recycled plastic as a construction material and its possible future applications. This was attained by targeting the highly reputable journals articles published during the last decade. Studies show the convenient recycling of thermoplastics due to their reversible nature. However, their durability and resistance to temperature are still points of concern. Recycled plastics are commonly used as replacements for aggregates in the manufacturing of cementitious composites as part of various research investigations. Efforts to tackle the issue of plastic waste include improving recycling infrastructure and encouraging the development of alternative materials.

1. Introduction

Plastics have evolved as a vital commodity for daily human use [1]. Over the past few decades, there has been an exponential increase in the production of plastic materials [2]. Plastic production is expected to surpass 0.50 billion tons in 2025. Around 60% of plastic waste remains non-recycled [3]. Pakistan generated nearly 12 million tons of plastic waste in 2020, and the amount generated could reach up to 22 million tons in 2050 [4]. Plastics are versatile, lightweight, and durable, making them popular for various applications, from packaging to construction to electronics [5]. The generation of plastic waste is a global environmental concern characterized by the production and accumulation of plastic materials that have reached the end of their useful life. Globally, around 0.40 billion tons of plastic wastes are generated [6]. Some of the major contributors to plastic waste are single-use plastics, such as disposable bags, bottles, straws, and packaging [7].
The two distinct categories of polymers are thermoplastics and thermosetting plastics, which exhibit different behaviors when subjected to heat [8,9]. Thermoplastics can be reformed in to any shape after heating and are referred to as recyclable due to their reversable nature [10]. However, thermosetting plastics undergo chemical changes upon heating that result in a hardened rigid material, a process referred to as polymerization [11]. This irreversible behavior leads to their finalized form, which cannot be softened or reshaped without significant degradation [12]. Thermoplastics generally have lower mechanical strength and heat resistance and may soften or deform at elevated temperatures [13]. However, thermosetting plastics are known for their high mechanical strength and excellent heat resistance. They maintain their structural integrity at elevated temperatures [14].
Thermoplastics are widely used in applications such as packaging materials, automotive components, consumer goods, and 3D printing due to their recyclable and re-processable nature [15], whereas thermosetting plastics are used in electrical insulators, aerospace components, automotive parts, and composite materials due to their durability and high levels of temperature resistance [16]. E-wastes, also referred as electronic wastes, originate from discarded or obsolete electronic and electrical devices, equipment, and components and are used in various forms in the construction industry [17]. These e-wastes are often recycled and incorporated into cementitious composites in the form of plastic aggregates [18,19]. Aggregates from recycled plastics have been utilized extensively as an ingredient by researchers for investigations of flexible pavements [20].
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, a limited addressal of the utilization of recycled plastic in construction materials is reported. This review paper is therefore intended to document the current and potential applications of recycled plastics as construction materials, as documented in the existing literature. To attain this, research studies published in highly reputable journals over the past decade are thoroughly reviewed to gather all published information relating to the utilization of recycled plastic in the construction industry. Firstly, the generation of waste plastic is discussed. Then, recycling techniques for waste plastic are reviewed. Finally, the current applications of recycled plastic as construction materials are explored, and potential future applications are discussed.

2. Generation of Waste Plastic

Plastic waste generation varies by region, but it has been steadily increasing worldwide, affecting both developed and developing countries [21]. Plastic waste poses serious environmental challenges, littering landscapes and waterways and contributing to oceanic pollution [22]. Nonbiodegradable plastics affect the ecosystem through soil pollution, marine pollution, and air pollution [23]. Most plastics are non-biodegradable, and their conversion into microplastics takes centuries [24,25]. Additionally, these microplastics may percolate into marine environments, and their unpredictable nature can severely impact the ecosystem [26]. The unpredictable nature of plastics corresponds to the carcinogenic and hazardous chemicals which are incorporated during processing to obtain the desired properties [27,28]. Additionally, appropriate planning for plastic waste management and waste plastic recycling requires the realistic forecasting of plastic waste generation [29].
Figure 1 shows various types of thermoplastics and thermosetting plastics. Polyethylene and polypropylene are two of the most widely produced thermoplastics globally [30]. These polymers are used extensively in packaging, construction, automotive, and consumer goods [31]. Beyond commodity thermoplastics like PE, PP, and PVC, there are specialized thermoplastics, such as polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyurethane, which are used in industries like the electronics, automotive, and aerospace industries [32]. On the other hand, thermosetting plastics are integral to the production of composite materials, including fiberglass, carbon fiber, and aramid fiber composites, which are used in the aerospace, automotive, and marine industries [33]. The global production of this type of plastic waste is influenced by the demand and consumption of plastic manufactured products.

3. Waste Plastic Recycling Techniques

The recycling of waste plastics is an important aspect contributing to the circular economy [34]. The conversion of waste plastic to recycled plastic corresponds to different techniques based on the type of conversion and the requirements of the byproducts [35]. The most common techniques practiced for recycling waste plastics are presented in Table 1. The authors of [36] reviewed methods and challenges associated with the mechanical recycling of PET, PE, PP, PS, and PVC from the perspective of the circular economy. Mechanical recycling is particularly effective for plastics with similar properties, such as clean and well-separated plastic containers, but it also face challenges in terms of recycling mixed plastics, contamination issues, and the potential for material degradation during multiple recycling cycles [37]. Chemical recycling, including catalytic methods carried out under mild temperatures, are beneficial due to the simplicity of the processes and the lack of a need for extensive energy [38]. Also, the technique is favorable for mixed plastics, contaminated plastics, or plastics with complex structures which are challenging to recycle via mechanical recycling [39].
The thermal recycling of waste plastics has the advantage of reducing the volume of plastic waste, recovering energy, and potentially producing valuable fuels [42]. Thermal recycling is recommended for plastics with high calorific fractions and utilizes plastic as a fuel or raw material, remaining efficient and environmentally safe via ensuring proper design, monitoring, and regulation [40]. The authors of [41] reviewed recycling methods for PET waste plastic in which a biotechnological recycling approach using the enzymatic degradation of PET was compared with mechanical and chemical recycling approaches. Both conventional methods result in a lower quality of recycled plastic, in addition to economic and environmental costs. However, biotechnological techniques using engineered microorganisms can result in the production of valuable byproducts. The biological degradation or tertiary recycling technique completely breaks down waste plastic into its chemical component materials [43]. Based on the desired mechanical and durability properties, the adoption of recycling processes varies depending on the type of plastic waste stream to be recycled [44,45].

4. Application of Recycled Plastic as a Construction Material

The majority of the studies on recycled plastic from the perspective of construction materials use it in aggregates. The authors of [19] investigated the use of thermoset plastic as a 5% replacement for fine particles to develop eco-friendly cement mortar. It was observed that the composition resulted in the highest compressive strength, with a dense microstructure and a robust interfacial transition zone. The authors of [46] evaluated the composition of 50% sand and 50% high-density polyethylene (HDPE) to manufacture a sand–plastic composite intended to be used as floor tiles. It was revealed that low water absorption and sufficient adhesion increased interfacial bonding, leading to maximum compressive and flexural strength. The composite was recommended as a paving material in the non-traffic areas of public places. Table 2 shows various applications of plastic in the construction industry.
Pavement construction using plastic as a constituent has also gained attention in the recent decade. The authors of [47] used a modified bitumen mix containing the addition of waste plastic addition at 5-10% by weight of bitumen to evaluate its performance in a wearing course for flexible pavement. The results revealed a better service life in terms of increased strength and fatigue life. Another study was conducted [48] to evaluate the effects of the addition of HDPE and PP to bitumen. From 0.5% to 3% of HDPE and PP with an increment of 0.5% were replaced by weight of graded bitumen in a temperature range of 160 °C to 170 °C. As a result, the successful blending-in of the polymer strands in the bitumen was observed. Additionally, by using PP, a stable, polymer-modified bitumen was obtained for pavement construction.

5. Conclusions

This review paper focuses on the viable use of recycled plastics as construction materials, examining data extracted from relevant articles published in highly reputable journals over the past decade. This effort was made to compile pertinent published data concerning plastic recycling and its relevance for construction material applications. Based on this literature review, the conclusions are as follows:
  • The 2% annual growth rate of waste plastic is an alarming environmental challenge for Pakistan which needs to be addressed using an industrial-level recycling plan.
  • The decision to adopt a feasible recycling process majorly depends on the cost-effectiveness, the desired properties of the by-products, and environmental impacts.
  • Through obtaining recycled plastic with desirable mechanical and durability properties, waste plastic generation can benefit the construction industry by providing sustainable and resilient materials.
  • Future research studies should be oriented towards the properties-oriented process modification of recycling techniques to accelerate the large-scale transition of waste plastic into useful recycled plastic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A. and M.A.; methodology, S.A. and M.A.; investigation, S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.; writing—review and editing, S.A. and M.A.; supervision, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank every person who provided support over the course of this research. The careful review and constructive suggestions by the anonymous reviewer are gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, Y.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, X.; Polaczyk, P.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, M.; Huang, B. The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: A review. Clean. Mater. 2021, 2, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gilbert, M. Plastics materials: Introduction and historical development. In Brydson’s Plastics Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Ahmad, W.; Ahmad, A.; Ivanovich Vatin, N.; Mohamed, A.M.; Deifalla, A.F.; Mehmood, I. Plastic waste management strategies and their environmental aspects: A scientometric analysis and comprehensive review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tamoor, M.; Samak, N.A.; Xing, J. Pakistan toward Achieving Net-Zero Emissions: Policy and Roadmap. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 11, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malkar, R.; Kagale, S.; Chavan, S.; Tiwari, M.; Patil, P. Applications of Bioplastics in Sports and Leisure. Handb. Bioplastics Biocomposites Eng. Appl. 2023, 2, 299–315. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tejaswini, M.; Pathak, P.; Ramkrishna, S.; Ganesh, P.S. A comprehensive review on integrative approach for sustainable management of plastic waste and its associated externalities. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schnurr, R.E.; Alboiu, V.; Chaudhary, M.; Corbett, R.A.; Quanz, M.E.; Sankar, K.; Srain, H.S.; Thavarajah, V.; Xanthos, D.; Walker, T.R. Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 137, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Benin, M.A.; Retnam, B.S.J.; Ramachandran, M.; Sivapragash, M.; Dhas, J.E.R. Comparative study of tensile properties on Thermoplastic & Thermosetting polymer composites. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2015, 10, 10109–10113. [Google Scholar]
  9. Geyer, R. A brief history of plastics. Mare Plast.-Plast. Sea Combat. Plast. Pollut. Through Sci. Art 2020, 31–47. [Google Scholar]
  10. Stieven Montagna, L.; Ferreira de Melo Morgado, G.; Lemes, A.P.; Roberto Passador, F.; Cerqueira Rezende, M. Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset composites: A review. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2023, 36, 3455–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, P.; Tian, J.; Li, C.; Tang, Z. Comparative study of durability behaviors of thermoplastic polypropylene and thermosetting epoxy exposed to elevated temperature, water immersion and sustained bending loading. Polymers 2022, 14, 2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, T.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, J. Recent development of repairable, malleable and recyclable thermosetting polymers through dynamic transesterification. Polymer 2020, 194, 122392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bhagat, G.V.; Savoikar, P.P. Durability related properties of cement composites containing thermoplastic aggregates–A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 53, 104565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.S.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, D.; Wu, S. Reversible Crosslinking of Commodity Polymers via Photocontrolled Metal–Ligand Coordination for High-Performance and Recyclable Thermoset Plastics. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2305517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oladele, I.O.; Okoro, C.J.; Taiwo, A.S.; Onuh, L.N.; Agbeboh, N.I.; Balogun, O.P.; Olubambi, P.A.; Lephuthing, S.S. Modern Trends in Recycling Waste Thermoplastics and Their Prospective Applications: A Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Millet, H.; Vangheluwe, P.; Block, C.; Sevenster, A.; Garcia, L.; Antonopoulos, R. The nature of plastics and their societal usage. Plast. Environ. 2018, 2018, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Luhar, S.; Luhar, I. Potential application of E-wastes in construction industry: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 203, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nasier, S. Utilization of recycled form of concrete, E-wastes, glass, quarry rock dust and waste marble powder as reliable construction materials. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 3231–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Qin, R.; Chow, C.L.; Lau, D. Recycling thermoset plastic waste for manufacturing green cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 137, 104922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.; Nawarathna, H.M.; Hesp, S.A. On the sustainable use of recycled plastics in flexible asphalt pavements. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 359, 132081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, R.K.; Ruj, B. Time and temperature depended fuel gas generation from pyrolysis of real world municipal plastic waste. Fuel 2016, 174, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rajmohan, K.V.S.; Ramya, C.; Viswanathan, M.R.; Varjani, S. Plastic pollutants: Effective waste management for pollution control and abatement. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2019, 12, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kibria, M.G.; Masuk, N.I.; Safayet, R.; Nguyen, H.Q.; Mourshed, M. Plastic waste: Challenges and opportunities to mitigate pollution and effective management. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2023, 17, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Silvarrey, L.D.; Phan, A. Kinetic study of municipal plastic waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 16352–16364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pettipas, S.; Bernier, M.; Walker, T.R. A Canadian policy framework to mitigate plastic marine pollution. Mar. Policy 2016, 68, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pivnenko, K.; Eriksen, M.K.; Martín-Fernández, J.A.; Eriksson, E.; Astrup, T.F. Recycling of plastic waste: Presence of phthalates in plastics from households and industry. Waste Manag. 2016, 54, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eriksen, M.K.; Pivnenko, K.; Olsson, M.E.; Astrup, T.F. Contamination in plastic recycling: Influence of metals on the quality of reprocessed plastic. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghinea, C.; Drăgoi, E.N.; Comăniţă, E.-D.; Gavrilescu, M.; Câmpean, T.; Curteanu, S.; Gavrilescu, M. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 182, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hamad, K.; Kaseem, M.; Deri, F. Recycling of waste from polymer materials: An overview of the recent works. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2801–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maddah, H.A. Polypropylene as a promising plastic: A review. Am. J. Polym. Sci 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Amin, S.; Amin, M. Thermoplastic elastomeric (TPE) materials and their use in outdoor electrical insulation. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci 2011, 29, 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bobade, S.K.; Paluvai, N.R.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S. Bio-based thermosetting resins for future generation: A review. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2016, 55, 1863–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shamsuyeva, M.; Endres, H.-J. Plastics in the context of the circular economy and sustainable plastics recycling: Comprehensive review on research development, standardization and market. Compos. Part C Open Access 2021, 6, 100168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shen, L.; Worrell, E. Plastic recycling. In Handbook of Recycling; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 179–190. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schyns, Z.O.; Shaver, M.P. Mechanical recycling of packaging plastics: A review. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021, 42, 2000415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gu, F.; Guo, J.; Zhang, W.; Summers, P.A.; Hall, P. From waste plastics to industrial raw materials: A life cycle assessment of mechanical plastic recycling practice based on a real-world case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601, 1192–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thiounn, T.; Smith, R.C. Advances and approaches for chemical recycling of plastic waste. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rahimi, A.; García, J.M. Chemical recycling of waste plastics for new materials production. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kijo-Kleczkowska, A.; Gnatowski, A. Recycling of plastic waste, with particular emphasis on thermal methods. Energies 2022, 15, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Soong, Y.-H.V.; Sobkowicz, M.J.; Xie, D. Recent advances in biological recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic wastes. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhuo, C.; Levendis, Y.A. Upcycling waste plastics into carbon nanomaterials: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 39931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, A.; Liew, M.S. Tertiary recycling of plastics waste: An analysis of feedstock, chemical and biological degradation methods. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021, 23, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khalid, M.Y.; Arif, Z.U.; Ahmed, W.; Arshad, H. Recent trends in recycling and reusing techniques of different plastic polymers and their composite materials. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, 31, e00382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vollmer, I.; Jenks, M.J.; Roelands, M.C.; White, R.J.; van Harmelen, T.; de Wild, P.; van Der Laan, G.P.; Meirer, F.; Keurentjes, J.T.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Beyond mechanical recycling: Giving new life to plastic waste. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15402–15423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Soni, A.; Das, P.K.; Yusuf, M.; Kamyab, H.; Chelliapan, S. Development of sand-plastic composites as floor tiles using silica sand and recycled thermoplastics: A sustainable approach for cleaner production. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Duggal, P.; Shisodia, A.S.; Havelia, S.; Jolly, K. Use of waste plastic in wearing course of flexible pavement. In Proceedings of the Advances in Structural Engineering and Rehabilitation: Select Proceedings of TRACE 2018, Greifswald, Germany, 24–27 April 2018; pp. 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  48. Appiah, J.K.; Berko-Boateng, V.N.; Tagbor, T.A. Use of waste plastic materials for road construction in Ghana. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2017, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Types of thermoplastics and thermosetting plastics.
Figure 1. Types of thermoplastics and thermosetting plastics.
Engproc 53 00005 g001
Table 1. Plastic waste recycling techniques.
Table 1. Plastic waste recycling techniques.
ApproachProcessRef.
Mechanical RecyclingThe sorting, cleaning, shredding, and then melting waste plastic.[36]
Chemical RecyclingThe breakdown of plastic waste into its constituent molecules through chemical processing.[39]
Thermal RecyclingThe breakdown of plastic waste into its constituent molecules through heating at a high temperature.[40]
Biological RecyclingThe conversion of plastic waste into biomass or other useful products through microorganisms such as bacteria or fungi.[41]
Table 2. Use of recycled plastic as a construction material.
Table 2. Use of recycled plastic as a construction material.
ApplicationCompositionModified PropertiesRef.
Eco-friendly cement mortar5% thermoset waste as a replacement for fine particlesThe highest compressive strength, a highly dense microstructure, and a robust interfacial transition zone.[19]
Sand–plastic composites as floor tiles50% sand and 50% HDPEMaximum compressive and flexural strength due to sufficient adhesion, increased interfacial bonding, and low water absorption.[46]
Wearing course of flexible pavementModified bitumen mix and processed waste plastic of about 5–10% by wt. of bitumenIncreased fatigue life and strength, ultimately enhancing the service life of pavement.[47]
Pavement construction0.5–3% HDPE and PP by weight of graded bitumen at a temperature range from 160 °C to 170 °CA successful blending-in of the polymer strands in bitumen was observed.
Stable polymer-modified bitumen was obtained using PP for pavement construction.
[48]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, S.; Ali, M. Potential Applications of Different Forms of Recycled Plastics as Construction Materials—A Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 53, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCBD2023-15177

AMA Style

Ahmed S, Ali M. Potential Applications of Different Forms of Recycled Plastics as Construction Materials—A Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 53(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCBD2023-15177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Shehryar, and Majid Ali. 2023. "Potential Applications of Different Forms of Recycled Plastics as Construction Materials—A Review" Engineering Proceedings 53, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCBD2023-15177

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop