Next Article in Journal
Biodegradable and Transparent PVA/Starch-Based Composite Films for Wound Dressing Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Nanotribological Investigation of the Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) Films Manufactured from the Storage Polyesters Produced by Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Dynamic Characterization of Biosensing MEMS Cantilevers with Different Position of the Driving Electrode—Vacuum Response Versus Ambient Conditions †

Micro & Nano Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Technical University of 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Conference on Micromachines and Applications, 15–30 April 2021; Available online: https://micromachines2021.sciforum.net/.
Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Conference on Micromachines and Applications)

Abstract

:
The influence of the driving electrode positions on the dynamic response of polysilicon MEMS resonators used in biosensing applications is studied as a function of the operating conditions (vacuum versus free-air operating mode). The scope of this research work is orientated towards identifying the effect of driving electrode position on the dynamic response of sensing MEMS used in biomass detection. The mass-deposition detection is based on the change in the resonant frequency of vibrating elements considering a biological detection film deposited on the oscillating structure. The operating conditions, such as medium pressure, change the behavior of the dynamic response including the resonant frequency, the amplitude, and the velocity of oscillations as well as the quality factor and the loss of energy. The change in the dynamic response of the investigated MEMS cantilevers as a function of the lower electrode position and operating conditions is evaluated using a Polytec Laser Vibrometer. The decrease in the amplitude and velocity of the oscillations if the lower electrode is moved from the beam free-end toward the beam anchor is experimentally monitored. The changes in the response of samples in vacuum are slightly influenced by the electrode position compared with the response of the same sample in ambient conditions. Moreover, the effect of oscillating modes (first, second and third modes) is taken into consideration to improve the dynamical detection of the investigated samples. The obtained results indicate that different responses of MEMS resonators can be achieved if the position of the driving electrode is moved from the cantilever free-end toward the anchor. Indeed, the resonator stiffness, velocity and amplitude of oscillations are significantly modified for samples oscillating in ambient conditions for biological detection compared with their response in vacuum.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary file is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/Micromachines2021-09594.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pustan, M.; Birleanu, C.; Serdean, F. Dynamic Characterization of Biosensing MEMS Cantilevers with Different Position of the Driving Electrode—Vacuum Response Versus Ambient Conditions. Eng. Proc. 2021, 4, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/Micromachines2021-09594

AMA Style

Pustan M, Birleanu C, Serdean F. Dynamic Characterization of Biosensing MEMS Cantilevers with Different Position of the Driving Electrode—Vacuum Response Versus Ambient Conditions. Engineering Proceedings. 2021; 4(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/Micromachines2021-09594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pustan, Marius, Corina Birleanu, and Florina Serdean. 2021. "Dynamic Characterization of Biosensing MEMS Cantilevers with Different Position of the Driving Electrode—Vacuum Response Versus Ambient Conditions" Engineering Proceedings 4, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/Micromachines2021-09594

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop