Next Article in Journal
Nanoscopic Roughness Characterization of Chitosan with Buried Graphene Oxide for Fuel Cell Application
Previous Article in Journal
MIP-Based Screen-Printed Electrode for Irbesartan Sensing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 28
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2022028019
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Michael Schultz
1,*,
Junzi Sun
2,
Xavier Olive
3 and
Martin Strohmeier
4
1
Institute of Flight Systems, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany
2
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2619 HS Delft, The Netherlands
3
ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, 91120 Palaiseau, France
4
OpenSky Network, 3400 Burgdorf, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 10th OpenSky Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands, 10–11 November 2022.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 28(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022028019
Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 10th OpenSky Symposium)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: EasyChair
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 31
  • Number of submissions accepted: 19
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 60%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 to 3
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 13 reviewers
  • Any additional information on the review process: Reviews are based on the extended abstracts. They consist of expectations and recommendations about the scientific paper, should it be accepted. Reviewers declare their confidence and rank each abstract from strong reject (−3) to strong accept (+3), and decisions are based on a weighted average score.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schultz, M.; Sun, J.; Olive, X.; Strohmeier, M. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2022, 28, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022028019

AMA Style

Schultz M, Sun J, Olive X, Strohmeier M. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 28(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022028019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schultz, Michael, Junzi Sun, Xavier Olive, and Martin Strohmeier. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 28, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022028019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop