Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Effect of Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of an AA7075-Cu Overcast Joint Using the Taguchi Method
Previous Article in Journal
To Investigate Thermal Conductivity of Phase Change Material by Incorporating Surfactants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Investigating the Effect of Crack’s Inclination on Strain Energy and Stress Intensity under Uniaxial Loading †

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (FME), Ghulam Ishaq Khan (GIK) Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi 23460, Pakistan
2
Faculty of Material and Chemical Engineering (FMCE), Ghulam Ishaq Khan (GIK) Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi 23460, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (ICAME-22), Islamabad, Pakistan, 25 August 2022.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 23(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023009
Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering)

Abstract

:
The component’s strength and reliability are greatly influenced by the occurrence of cracks and flaws. Material surfaces or internal defects can create stress concentration, which causes failure of the materials. To quantify the stress intensity factor (SIF) and strain energy release rate (SERR) around the tips of the crack, numerical simulation has been performed on a plate of central crack with Comsol Multiphysics. The SIF and SERR with varying uniaxial stress loading (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 MPa) and crack’s angle (0°–180°) were determined using the J-integral method. The results show that the crack’s maximum opening and sliding displacement occurred at an angle of 90° and 45° respectively. For mode I, the SIFs were maximum at the crack’s inclination of 90° and for mode II, it was maximum at an angle of 45°. Similarly, the SERR was also found to be maximum when the crack was normal to the applied stress and observed to increase with the increase in applied stress.

1. Introduction

There are certain flaws or cracks either interior or at the surface of the components which were created due to high stresses induced during the manufacturing process. These cracks or flaws cause stress intensity when the components are under loading conditions. The stress distribution or intensity needs to be quantified around the tips of the crack because it creates a state of stress concentration (SC). SIF is a fracture mechanic parameter and is used to define the crack tips stress singularity and is denoted by K. When the SIF becomes equal to or greater than the fracture toughness, the component gets fractured and fails. Based on the crack surface displacement, the stresses near the crack tip can be divided into three basic types as shown in Figure 1 [1].
Research has been performed to develop fracture mechanics criteria to quantify the fracture toughness of different materials and developed different criteria. These fracture criteria can be classified into the following three groups which are further subdivided: stress, strain, and energy-based criterion [3].
For the uniaxial stress loading, the analytical equations for finding the SIFs within a rectangular plate of infinite length can be calculated by [4];
K I = σ × ( π a ) × s i n 2 β
K I I = σ × ( π a ) × s i n β × c o s β
The stress and strain around the crack tip are greatly affected by a constant term called T-stress and can lead to better results [5]. Energy-based theory cannot give a good prediction about the kink angle while the strain energy released rate (SERR) and maximum tangential stress (MTS) criteria give better predictions about the crack growth trajectories [6]. For a semi-infinite plate, the relationships between SIFs and the oblique edge fracture were investigated [7]. An experimental investigation was performed on the plate with a crack edge and find the effect on the SIFs (KI and KII) [8].
In the paper, a rectangular solid plate with an interior fracture is subjected to uniaxial stress. The fracture or crack is at an angle with the load direction, implying that it exhibits in both modes I and II. The J-integral approach is used to calculate the SERR at crack tips. As the stress intensity was caused at the tip of the crack and these SIFs must be quantified for both mode I and mode II using J- the integral method. The SIFs and SERR, the opening and sliding displacement with the crack’s inclination and applied stress was studied using COMSOL Multiphysics software.

2. Numerical Modeling

A rectangular Aluminum plate with a central slanted crack is subjected to a stress in the Y direction. The crack’s inclination varies from 0°–180° while the applied stress field varies from 5–25 MPa. The dimension of the plate is given in Table 1. The SIF and the SERR are to be calculated at each angle of the crack. The tips of the crack under the mixed mode (Tensile, compressive and shear) of stress loading can be in opening mode with the tensile mode (denoted by KI), in plan shear mode (denoted by KII) [9]. For this purpose, the Comsol Multiphysics was used to quantify the effect of loading stress and crack’s inclination on the SIFs, SERR, opening and sliding displacement.

3. Results and Discussion

A 2D rectangular plate with a central crack was studied using Comsol Multiphysics. The load was applied in the uniaxial direction in Y-direction. The crack’ angle was varied from 0° to 180° and the respective opening and sliding displacements, the SERR and the corresponding SIFs were determined. The slanted crack can create two types of SIFs, one for mode I (opening) and other for mode II (shear). As the crack is at center of the plate and it has two sharp edges, so at each edges the SIF was calculated for each mode. The variation of the opening and sliding displacement of the crack with the inclination and varying load is shown in Figure 2a,b respectively. Since the plate is two-dimensional plate, there will no tearing mode of crack. The SERR at both the crack tip 1 and tip 2 are given in Figure 2c,d. The SERR was high when the crack is normal to the applied load. For mode I, the SIFs at both the crack’s tip are given in Figure 2e,f. It will be high when the applied load and crack are normal to each other. Similarly, for mode II, the SIF is maximum when the applied load is at 45° to the crack as given in Figure 2g,h. The numerical simulation results are shown in Figure 3.

4. Conclusions

From the numerical investigation, it was concluded that:

4.1. For Mode I (Opening)

  • The opening displacement of the crack was maximum when the stress was applied normally (at 90°) to the crack and increased with the increase in the applied stress field.
  • The SERR was high when the crack was normal to the applied stress.
  • SIF was also high when the angle is 90° between applied stress and crack and was directly related to the applied stress.

4.2. For Mode II (Sliding)

  • The crack sliding displacement was maximum when the applied stress and the crack were at an angle of 45° and was directly related to the stress field.
  • The SERR was high when the crack was at 45° to the applied stress.
  • SIF was also high when the angle was 45° between applied stress and crack.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and M.J.; methodology, S.K. and M.J.; software, S.K. and F.N.K.; validation, S.K. and F.N.K.; formal analysis, S.K. and M.J.; investigation, S.K. and M.J.; data curation, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K., M.J. and F.N.K.; supervision, F.N.K.; project administration, F.N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Turis, M.; Ivánková, O. Using Finite Element Analysis to Obtain Plastic Zones in the Vicinity of the Crack Edges, under Mixed Mode Loading Conditions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Conference Structural and Physical Aspects of Construction Engineering (SPACE 2019), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, 13–15 November 2019; Volume 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, N.; Oterkus, E. Calculation of Stress Intensity Factor Using Displacement Extrapolation Method in Peridynamic Framework. J. Mech. 2020, 36, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, C.; Jin, X.; Fan, X.; Xu, R.; Wang, Z. A Generalized Maximum Energy Release Rate Criterion for Mixed Mode Fracture Analysis of Brittle and Quasi-brittle Materials. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2019, 100, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arunkumar, S.; Nithin, V.K. Estimation of Stress Intensity Factor of Multiple Inclined Centre Cracks under Biaxial Loading. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 2020, 20, 2040–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sedighiani, K.; Mosayebnejad, J.; Ehsasi, H.; Sahraei, H.R. The Effect of T-stress on the Brittle Fracture under Mixed Mode Loading. Procedia Eng. 2011, 10, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sakha, M.; Nejati, M.; Aminzadeh, A.; Ghouli, S.; Saar, M.O.; Dresner, T. On the Validation of Mixed-mode I/II Crack Growth Theories for Anisotropic rocks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2022, 241, 111484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, H.K.; Lee, S.B. Stress Intensity Factors of an Oblique Edge Crack Subjected to Normal and Shear Tractions. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 1996, 25, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohsin, N.R. Influence of the Location and Crack Angle on the Magnitude of Stress Intensity Factors Mode i and ii under Uniaxial Tension Stresses. Eur. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 3, 64–77. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fajdiga, G. Determining a kink angle of a crack in mixed mode fracture using maximum energy release rate, SED and MTS criteria. J. Multidiscip. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2015, 2, 356–362. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The three types of loading with respective crack’ modes (a) Mode I (b) Mode II (c) Mode III [1] (d) The inclination of the crack with the load stress [2].
Figure 1. The three types of loading with respective crack’ modes (a) Mode I (b) Mode II (c) Mode III [1] (d) The inclination of the crack with the load stress [2].
Engproc 23 00009 g001
Figure 2. The variation of crack opening displacement with angle and loads (a) The variation of crack sliding displacement with inclination and loads (b) The SERR for mode I at crack tip 1 (c) The SERR for mode I at crack tip 2 (d) The SIF for mode II at crack tip 1 (e) The SIF for mode II at crack tip 2 (f) The SIF for mode I at crack tip 1 (g) The SIF for mode I at crack tip 1 (h).
Figure 2. The variation of crack opening displacement with angle and loads (a) The variation of crack sliding displacement with inclination and loads (b) The SERR for mode I at crack tip 1 (c) The SERR for mode I at crack tip 2 (d) The SIF for mode II at crack tip 1 (e) The SIF for mode II at crack tip 2 (f) The SIF for mode I at crack tip 1 (g) The SIF for mode I at crack tip 1 (h).
Engproc 23 00009 g002aEngproc 23 00009 g002b
Figure 3. Von mises stress distribution at different applied loads (a) 5 MPa (b) 10 MPa (c) 15 MPa (d) 20 MPa (e) 25 MPa.
Figure 3. Von mises stress distribution at different applied loads (a) 5 MPa (b) 10 MPa (c) 15 MPa (d) 20 MPa (e) 25 MPa.
Engproc 23 00009 g003
Table 1. The dimensions of the rectangular plate with central crack.
Table 1. The dimensions of the rectangular plate with central crack.
S. NoParametersSymbolValues
1Plate’s lengthL100 mm
2Plate’s widthW80 mm
3Crack length2a40 mm
4Crack angleβ0°–180°
5Load in Y-axisσ5–25 MPa
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, S.; Junaid, M.; Khan, F.N. Investigating the Effect of Crack’s Inclination on Strain Energy and Stress Intensity under Uniaxial Loading. Eng. Proc. 2022, 23, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023009

AMA Style

Khan S, Junaid M, Khan FN. Investigating the Effect of Crack’s Inclination on Strain Energy and Stress Intensity under Uniaxial Loading. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 23(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Salman, Massab Junaid, and Fahd Nawaz Khan. 2022. "Investigating the Effect of Crack’s Inclination on Strain Energy and Stress Intensity under Uniaxial Loading" Engineering Proceedings 23, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop