Previous Issue
Volume 5, March
 
 

CivilEng, Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2024) – 4 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 7220 KiB  
Article
Railroad Infrastructure Management: A Novel Tool for Automatic Interpretation of GPR Imaging to Minimize Human Intervention in Railroad Inspection
by Ammar Alzarrad, Caleb Wise, Arka Chattopadhyay, Sudipta Chowdhury, Abby Cisko and Jeremy Beasley
CivilEng 2024, 5(2), 378-394; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng5020019 - 16 Apr 2024
Viewed by 403
Abstract
Regular monitoring and inspection of military railroad tracks are necessary to ensure the safe transportation of military freight. Manual railroad inspection has drawbacks and limitations that can impact accuracy and efficiency. This study introduces a novel tool designed to automate Ground Penetrating Radar [...] Read more.
Regular monitoring and inspection of military railroad tracks are necessary to ensure the safe transportation of military freight. Manual railroad inspection has drawbacks and limitations that can impact accuracy and efficiency. This study introduces a novel tool designed to automate Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) imaging interpretation for railroad ballast condition assessment, aiming to reduce human intervention in inspections. The tool uses advanced signal processing techniques, such as the Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) and Wavelet Transform (WT), to quantify ballast fouling levels accurately, enhancing maintenance and safety protocols for railroad tracks. Validation through comprehensive testing, including two case studies, demonstrates the tool’s superior efficacy over traditional manual inspection methods. This research represents a pivotal step towards more efficient and reliable infrastructure management, ensuring critical railroad systems’ safety and operational integrity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in CivilEng)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 17295 KiB  
Article
Energy-Based Design of Buckling-Restrained Steel Braced Frames for Concurrent Occurrences of Earthquake and Wind
by Taonian Shan and Eric M. Lui
CivilEng 2024, 5(2), 343-377; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng5020018 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 298
Abstract
This paper describes the development of a dual hazard spectrum for use in the dynamic analysis of steel frames subject to the combined effects of earthquakes and wind. The proposed spectrum is obtained by combining the power spectra of earthquakes and wind using [...] Read more.
This paper describes the development of a dual hazard spectrum for use in the dynamic analysis of steel frames subject to the combined effects of earthquakes and wind. The proposed spectrum is obtained by combining the power spectra of earthquakes and wind using the square root of the sum of squares (SRSS) combination method. An equivalent time excitation function is then computed using an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) and serves as input for the dynamic analysis. Using time-history analysis on the OpenSees platform, the dynamic responses expressed in terms of peak and residual inter-story and roof drifts for two multistory steel frames located in two US cities (Los Angeles and Charleston) are obtained to demonstrate that designing these buildings based on just one hazard may not be adequate. For frames that are considered under-designed, an energy-based design procedure that uses buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) to dissipate the excess energy imparted to these frames is proposed so they will satisfy the FEMA 356 recommended drift limits for the performance levels of immediate occupancy and life safety. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in CivilEng)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4479 KiB  
Review
Modeling Techniques, Seismic Performance, and the Application of Rocking Shallow Foundations: A Review
by Musab Aied Qissab Al-Janabi, Duaa Al-Jeznawi and Luís Filipe Almeida Bernardo
CivilEng 2024, 5(2), 327-342; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng5020017 - 11 Apr 2024
Viewed by 479
Abstract
The intriguing rocking behavior of foundations has attracted the attention of both researchers and professionals, owing to its beneficial characteristics such as energy absorption and self-adjusting capability. This paper offers a thorough examination of various modeling techniques, seismic performance evaluation methods, and the [...] Read more.
The intriguing rocking behavior of foundations has attracted the attention of both researchers and professionals, owing to its beneficial characteristics such as energy absorption and self-adjusting capability. This paper offers a thorough examination of various modeling techniques, seismic performance evaluation methods, and the practical application of innovative rocking shallow foundations. While conventional fixed-base designs can absorb seismic energy, they often suffer from lasting damage due to residual deformation. In contrast, rocking foundation structures facilitate controlled rocking movements by loosening the connection between the structure and the foundation, thereby enhancing overall stability. Historical studies dating back to the 19th century demonstrate the effectiveness of rocking foundations in reducing seismic impact and ductility demands, leading to cost savings. Furthermore, this paper extends its focus to contemporary considerations, exploring modern modeling techniques, seismic performance assessments, and practical applications for rocking shallow foundations. By highlighting their role in improving structural resilience, this study investigates seismic hazard analysis, geological factors, and site-specific conditions influencing foundation behavior. It covers essential aspects such as dynamic responses and modeling methodologies, drawing insights from real-world case studies. Through a comprehensive review of both numerical and experimental investigations, the article provides a synthesis of current knowledge and identifies avenues for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Structural and Earthquake Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 12870 KiB  
Article
Influence of the Nature of Cement on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Soil Concretes from Sandy Clay and Laterite
by Alain Kamdem, Emmanuel Elat, Javad Eslami, Jean Chills Amba, Moussa Sali, Michel Mbessa and Albert Noumowé
CivilEng 2024, 5(2), 307-326; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng5020016 - 07 Apr 2024
Viewed by 333
Abstract
Soil concrete is a material produced by mixing the soil at the site with a hydraulic binder. This paper aims to study the influence of the nature of binder on the physical and mechanical properties of soil concrete. For the mixtures, three types [...] Read more.
Soil concrete is a material produced by mixing the soil at the site with a hydraulic binder. This paper aims to study the influence of the nature of binder on the physical and mechanical properties of soil concrete. For the mixtures, three types of soil were chosen and studied: sandy clay with a granular class of 0/5 (SA5), laterite with a granular class of 0/5 (LA5), and laterite with a granular class of 0/10 (LA10). Three different cements were used: CEM I 52.5, CEM II 42.5, and CEM III 32.5, with cement contents of 150 and 250 kg/m3. The soil concretes were designed for a constant spread of 32–33 cm measured on a mini-slump. The results showed that LA5-based soil concrete has a higher water content of about 8.8% more than SA5 and LA10-based soil concretes. For all the mixtures, the lowest porosity values were obtained with CEM III 32.5, followed by CEM I 52.5, and finally CEM II 42.5. For the three types of cement and the same soil granular size, the compressive strength, static, and dynamic modulus of SA5-based soil concretes are higher than LA5. It was noted that the mechanical properties of soil concretes made with CEM III 32.5 are higher than those made with CEM I 52.5 and CEM II 42.5. Regardless of the type of cement used, the mechanical properties obtained on LA10-based soil concrete are higher than those on LA5-based soil concrete. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in CivilEng)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop