Next Article in Journal
Development and Trial of a Multipurpose Customized Orthosis for Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomechanical Analysis of Recreational Cycling with Unilateral Transtibial Prostheses
Previous Article in Journal
Radiological and Periodontal Evaluation of Stock and Custom CAD/CAM Implant Abutments—A One-Year Follow-Up Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Testing the Use of Advanced Upper Limb Prostheses: Towards Quantifying the Movement Quality with Inertial-Magnetic Measurement Units
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Real-Time Intent Sensing for Assistive Devices with Implications for Minimising Maintenance

Prosthesis 2023, 5(2), 453-466; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5020031
by Joseph Russell * and Jeroen H. M. Bergmann
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Prosthesis 2023, 5(2), 453-466; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5020031
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 28 April 2023 / Accepted: 2 May 2023 / Published: 6 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Control, and Biomechanics of Prosthetic Limbs)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper deals with two kinds of multi-sensor control systems for prosthetics, namely, the non-modular method and modular method. The modular method has been found to be advantegous when comparing with non-modular method.

The research is well designed and carried out correctly. The presented examples are convincing. The conclusions are well supported by the examples and the discussion of the results.

The results can be applied into practice immediately. I believe the paper can appear in the Journal.

Author Response

Thank you very much for the feedback - we are pleased to hear the paper has been well received and look forward to publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors provided the readers with the description of an interesting approach for real-time detection of intentions in using assistive devices. Their new algorithm has been compared to existing solutions, demonstrating higher accuracy in conditions of sensor dropout. Their conclusions suggest that, when sensing capabilities tend to fall over time, a modular method is more appriopriate for controlling an assistive device. Honestly, after reading the improvements to the text, I consider the paper ready for publication.

 

Author Response

We are very grateful for this positive feedback, and look forward to publishing the paper.

Back to TopTop