3.1. Temperature Distribution in the Tunnel at Different Fire Locations
As shown in
Figure 7a, when the fire source was located in the immersed tube section, the temperature directly above it rapidly rose to 770 °C. Within a 10 m radius of the fire, the temperatures decreased significantly. Upstream of the fire source, the temperature returned to ambient levels, indicating that a longitudinal air velocity of 2 m/s effectively prevented the backflow of flue gas.
In the confluence section, wider beam spacing resulted in higher longitudinal temperatures. This was due to the smoke originating from the buried area, causing turbulence in the region. Larger beam spacing intensified this turbulence, disrupting the settling of high-temperature smoke, resulting in higher temperatures compared to scenarios with smaller beam spacing. As the smoke progressed into the four-lane section, its temperature gradually decreased from 65 °C to the ambient temperature.
In
Figure 7b, it was observed that temperatures within 50 m of the highway aisle entrance were higher compared to the confluence section. This was due to the smaller spacing between the highway aisle and the top plate. Even with the same thickness of the smoke layer, the 2 m height in the highway aisle experienced higher temperatures. The highway aisle was naturally ventilated, so the smoke temperature was not affected by the cooling effect of ventilation.
The effect of beam spacing on the longitudinal temperature distribution at a 2 m height in the highway aisle and the confluence section exhibited an opposite pattern, where smaller beam spacing resulted in higher temperatures at the highway aisle location. In essence, the results highlighted the significant impact of beam spacing on temperature distribution and how different configurations influenced temperature profiles within the tunnel.
As shown in the temperature distribution cloud diagram in
Figure 8, it was observed that upstream of the fire source there was no smoke backflow, and temperatures remained close to ambient. Moving downstream from the fire source, temperatures gradually decreased with the increasing distance. In the immersed tube tunnel, which featured a 4% slope, and at the confluence section interface, with a sudden cross-section change, complex airflow conditions resulted due to boundary effects. Factors like the chimney effect and longitudinal wind speed accelerated the smoke spread, forming a low-temperature vortex region, as depicted in
Figure 8c.
As the smoke progressed into the confluence section and the highway auxiliary road section, thermal buoyancy caused it to rise, hit the tunnel ceiling, and spread laterally to the highway auxiliary road while also moving longitudinally along the tunnel ceiling. Increasing the spacing between the beams enhanced the smoke storage capacity and shortened the distance over which high-temperature smoke spreads, providing better control. This study delved into the dispersion of smoke and the distribution of temperature at a 2 m height, considering a beam height of 1.2 m and various beam spacings: 1.0 m, 1.8 m, 3.6 m, and 7.2 m. The findings of this research are consistent with those of Halawa and Safwat [
23], who investigated smoke propagation under a beam height of 1 m and beam spacings of 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, and 20 m. Their results indicated that with a 5 m beam spacing the distance of smoke spread decreased by 79.4% compared to scenarios without beams. Additionally, when compared to larger beam spacings, there was a higher concentration of smoke, the high-temperature region encroached upon the personnel activity area, and the minimum height above the ground was only 1.8 m.
As shown in the comparison of the heights of the high-temperature region above the four-lane section in
Figure 8a,b, smaller girder lattice spacing of 1.0 m and 1.8 m resulted in a thinner smoke layer due to a lower kinetic energy and less interference from dense beams. In contrast, larger beam spacing 3.6 m and 7.2 m allowed smoke to move more freely, accumulating kinetic energy. This led to more significant disruptions to the stability of the smoke layer, resulting in an increased smoke layer thickness.
Figure 8c–e demonstrated that smaller lattice spacing of 1.0 m generated a small vortex within the beam lattice, ensuring a stable smoke layer. However, with larger spacing of 7.8 m, flow lines fluctuated considerably within 20 m of the converging section entrance, primarily due to the tunnel’s low height and the absence of longitudinal ventilation. Consequently, smoke filled most of the tunnel space.
In summary, these observations underscored the substantial impact of beam lattice spacing on smoke behavior, providing valuable insights for controlling the temperature and smoke distribution in complex tunnels.
As shown in
Figure 9a, when the fire source was in the confluence section, the temperature at a 2 m height upstream of the fire source closely matched the ambient temperature. The longitudinal wind speed of 2 m/s effectively controlled the smoke spread upstream of the fire source. Downstream of the fire source, lower beam grid spacing resulted in a decrease in the longitudinal temperature distribution. Smaller beam grids had less impact on the smoke spread disturbance, and the 2 m height temperature was less affected by high-temperature smoke.
As smoke spread downstream from the fire source, heat was lost as smoke circulated and drew in cold air. This gradual temperature decrease continued with a greater distance from the fire source. The highway tunnel and confluence section did not have wall panels separating the top space, allowing smoke to spread laterally above the 17 m wide highway tunnel. In the highway tunnel, where mechanical ventilation was absent, the maximum temperature decreased significantly.
Figure 9b shows temperature drops along both sides of the highway tunnel. Due to the influence of longitudinal ventilation, the smoke not only spreads laterally to the road auxiliary section but also extends longitudinally along the tunnel downstream of the fire source. Consequently, the highest temperature above the road auxiliary section does not occur at the same longitudinal position as the fire source but shifts downstream.
As shown in
Figure 10a,b, a longitudinal ventilation wind speed of 2 m/s effectively prevented smoke from reaching the concealed buried section. When the beam grid spacing was 3.6 m, the high-temperature region had the shortest spreading distance but increased in thickness due to the greater perturbation of the flue gas movement.
In
Figure 10c,d, the flue gas return length was significantly shorter, with a 7.2 m beam spacing compared to a 1.0 m beam spacing, resulting in a thicker flue gas layer. In the highway auxiliary roadway, high-temperature smoke filled the entire tunnel with a 7.8 m beam grid spacing, while a 1.0 m spacing led to the formation of small smoke vortices between the beams.
Figure 10e shows a consistent high-temperature smoke layer thickness between the highway subway and the confluence section with a 1.0 m girder grid spacing. However, a 7.8 m girder grid spacing reduced the smoke return velocity in the confluence section compared to the auxiliary road section, partly due to the absence of smoke evacuation facilities in the latter. This emphasized the significant impact of larger girder grid spacing on obstructing smoke flow.
When the fire source was located on the auxiliary road,
Figure 11a indicated that temperatures were higher in the confluence section near the fire source. As smoke spread to the four lanes, temperatures gradually decreased. Interestingly, larger beam spacings resulted in higher temperatures than smaller spacings. This trend was consistent with the scenario where the fire source was located in the confluence section.
Comparatively, when the fire source was in the highway auxiliary road it had less influence on the temperature field of the adjacent lane. The smaller tunnel height in the highway section caused higher temperatures at 2 m after the smoke settled in the same longitudinal position as the fire source. Additionally, a 2 m/s longitudinal ventilation wind speed in the confluence section cooled high-temperature smoke while suppressing its spread. This lowered the temperature in the confluence section, introducing variability in how the fire source’s location affected the longitudinal temperature distribution of neighboring road sections.
In
Figure 11b, with the fire source in the highway auxiliary road, natural smoke spread occurred. Smaller beam spacings resulted in less perturbation of the smoke layer and greater stability. Smoke accumulated in the upper region of the tunnel, and the upstream temperature of the fire source was lower when compared to scenarios with larger beam spacings. Downstream of the fire source, the longitudinal temperature distribution at the 2 m height remained close to the ambient temperature.
In
Figure 12a,b, it was observed that the high-temperature region above the four lanes shortened as the spacing of the beam lattice increased. Notably, the high-temperature region was shortest when the beam lattice spacing was 3.6 m, allowing for the most effective control of smoke spread. When the beam lattice spacing exceeded 1.8 m, it became apparent that the lattice disturbed the smoke, resulting in a thicker smoke layer.
Figure 12c,d demonstrated that larger beam lattice spacing led to a wider region of flow velocity fluctuation and a thicker smoke layer.
When the fire source was positioned within the four-lane section, and to better comprehend the smoke dispersion pattern into the buried section, confluence section, and highway auxiliary road section, the fire source was placed at the center of the tunnel, 10 m from the exits of both the confluence section and the highway auxiliary road section.
As illustrated in
Figure 13a, under a longitudinal wind speed of 2 m/s, the temperature in the buried section remained close to ambient. However, within a range of 25 m upstream of the fire source, temperatures at a 2 m height exhibited an increase. With the expansion of the beam grid spacing, the smoke experienced greater disturbance, disrupting the smoke layer structure and elevating tunnel temperatures.
Figure 13b revealed significant fluctuations in the longitudinal temperature distribution at a 2 m height within the highway access road. Smoke spreading from the four lanes to the highway access road resulted in disordered smoke layer structures due to the absence of uniform longitudinal ventilation. There was no clear stratification, and the disturbance and fluctuation of smoke were more pronounced with larger girder grid spacing.
Figure 14a,b illustrates that when the fire source was situated within the four-lane section, smoke was contained within the confluence section, gathering at the tunnel’s upper region. The length of the high-temperature zone in the four-lane area shortened and then increased with the growing lattice spacing, with the shortest high-temperature size observed at a spacing of 3.6 m. As with other fire source locations, the smoke layer thickness within the tunnel significantly increased with the expanding lattice spacing.
For a lattice spacing of 1 m, the ambient temperature was essentially maintained in the confluence section and within a 20 m range at the entrance of the highway auxiliary road. In contrast, when the lattice spacing was 7.2 m only the temperature and flow rate distribution cloud diagram was provided (
Figure 14c,d). This cloud diagram revealed substantial disruption in the smoke layer, mainly when the beam lattice spacing was 7.8 m.
With a 1.0 m beam lattice spacing, the smoke exhibited a faster reflux rate within the highway auxiliary road than in the confluence section, as shown in
Figure 14e. When the beam grid spacing was 7.2 m, the smoke predominantly spread against the side wall of the highway aisle.
Figure 15, focusing on the fire source located in the confluence section, provided insights into smoke movement behavior. The smoke spread horizontally to the highway auxiliary road section and longitudinally along the tunnel ceiling.
A critical ventilation rate of 2 m/s at the entrance of the immersed tube section ensured a smoke-free condition in the immersed tube section for all fire source locations except when the fire occurred in the immersed tube section itself. Due to the uneven wind speed distribution beneath the girder, the smoke front might exhibit a bias towards the highway auxiliary road. The identification of fire source locations in adjacent sections is essential, especially in areas where highway side roads and confluence sections are closely situated. This labeling serves to distinguish and compare variations in the fire temperature field and the pattern of smoke spread within neighboring sections.
Smoke propagation in the tunnel section under the beam was influenced by beam grid spacing, resulting in two distinct smoke movement patterns, as shown in
Figure 15c,d. Smaller beam grid spacing led to the formation of smoke vortexes between the beam grids, which accumulated less momentum and had a more negligible impact on the stability of the smoke layer. This resulted in lower temperatures at the 2 m height, providing a relatively safe evacuation environment.
In contrast, larger beam spacing encouraged extensive smoke development between the beams. This significantly disrupted the stability of the smoke layer, leading to an increased smoke and air volume suction, more significant smoke generation, and a thicker smoke layer. Consequently, the temperature at the 2 m height rose, creating a more hazardous evacuation environment.
It is important to note that the longitudinal temperature distribution at the 2 m height of the highway auxiliary road was influenced by various factors, including cross-section changes, the low tunnel height, and the uneven ventilation airflow. The impact of beam lattice spacing on this distribution varied.
3.3. Tunnel Fire Safety Analysis
In the absence of rafters above the tunnel, the temperature at a 2 m height upstream of the fire source remained at the ambient temperature, except when the fire source was positioned at the roadside channel, as depicted in
Figure 19a.
Figure 19b illustrates that when the fire source was located in the highway section, high-temperature smoke spilled out from the highway section exit due to the influence of the slope and variable cross-section. This caused the temperature upstream of the fire source to exceed the ambient temperature, with the maximum temperature above the fire source reaching 1000 °C. When the fire source was situated in the converging and highway sections, the temperature at a 2 m height within the tunnel remained at the ambient temperature. When the fire source was positioned in the converging and highway sections, its impact on the temperature distribution in neighboring tunnels was minimal, ensuring safe evacuation conditions.
When the fire source was situated in the immersed tube section, the smoke in this section was influenced by longitudinal ventilation and spread into the tunnel section under the cover. The confluence and road auxiliary sections experienced significant smoke accumulation with relatively high temperatures, presenting the most dangerous conditions. These sections had relatively low visibility inside the tunnel, as indicated by the black lines in
Figure 20. However, when the fire source was located in other positions, the visibility at a 2 m height was mostly unaffected in the remaining sections, except for reduced visibility near the fire source.
In complex tunnels with upper covers, the degree of danger varied depending on the location of the fire within the tunnel. Additionally, different beam spacing at the top affected the behavior of the fire smoke spread. In this study, the fire hazard range within the tunnel was defined based on the
SFPE Fire Engineering Handbook [
25], as shown in
Table 3. A critical hazard value was set, considering a temperature greater than 60 °C or visibility less than 10 m. As the range where the temperature reached the critical hazard value was larger than that of the visibility, the critical temperature value was used to determine hazardous areas in the evacuation environment.
Table 3 summarizes the impact of fire within the tunnel, considering the presence of top beam lattice structures. The most hazardous situation occurred when the fire source was in the immersed tube section with a beam lattice spacing of 3.6 m, resulting in a hazardous area extending up to 265 m. This was the most dangerous condition among all the scenarios considered. In contrast, when the fire source was in the road service section its impact on the fire safety of other sections was relatively lower. However, the road service section itself had a larger hazardous area, requiring a focus on rescue measures.
When the fire source is in the immersed tube section, vehicles downstream of the fire source in the main tunnel can still be driven directly to the tunnel exit, ensuring personnel safety. Although the tunnel temperature exceeds the critical danger value for over 200 m, the faster evacuation speed of vehicles is a safety assurance. In the four-lane section, where visibility is limited, careful road condition management during evacuation is essential to prevent traffic accidents blocking the escape route. A longitudinal wind speed of 2 m/s effectively prevents smoke from flowing upstream of the fire, ensuring a safe evacuation.
The tunnel temperature and visibility remain within safe ranges within the auxiliary road section and with a beam grid spacing of less than 3.6 m. In this scenario, it is advisable to contain the fire’s impact within the auxiliary road, allowing vehicles in that section to be driven directly out of the tunnel.
In typical tunnels, a fundamental evacuation principle dictates that vehicles cannot pass the location of the fire source during an emergency. Therefore, occupants upstream of the fire source must exit their cars to escape, while those downstream can drive to safety. However, in the case of the complex tunnel discussed in this paper, with various lanes divided into converging and highway auxiliary sections, distinct road conditions exist in different areas. This necessitates a redefinition of the upstream and downstream safety zones concerning the fire source.
Figure 21 illustrates these safety zones and vehicle access points when the fire source is in the converging section. In this case, when the fire source is in the confluence section, the temperature and visibility upstream of the fire source remain within safe limits. In such situations, individuals should promptly exit their vehicles and evacuate through designated doors or exits. In cases where the beam spacing is less than 3.6 m, the evacuation environment downstream of the fire source is relatively safe. Vehicles can continue to exit the tunnel in the direction of travel, and individuals can also use the pedestrian passages on both sides of the tunnel in emergencies, such as vehicle breakdowns.
For scenarios with a larger gap between the beams, the evacuation environment inside the tunnel becomes more perilous. In these instances, a lane should be designated for specific rescue purposes if a vehicle experiences mechanical failure and requires assistance evacuating occupants. In the highway auxiliary road section, the temperature is high, and smoke spreads from the position of the adjacent fire source to both sides. However, this section is not obstructed by the fire source, enabling vehicles to continue driving past the fire source. Individuals should aim to avoid abandoning their cars for escape in the challenging conditions of a high temperature and darkness caused by the fire. Instead, they should heed the commands of fire and rescue personnel to drive their vehicles out of the high-temperature zone quickly.
When the fire source is in the highway auxiliary road, the temperature and visibility in the immersed tube section, confluence section, and mainline of the tunnel are within safe levels. Vehicles in the mainline can exit the tunnel directly. Downstream cars in the highway auxiliary road can also evacuate directly. However, people and vehicles upstream of the fire source are exposed to a more dangerous fire environment, as indicated in
Figure 22.
In such cases, firefighters must act promptly to cool the area upstream of the fire source, conduct swift search and rescue operations, and provide gas masks and fire blankets to assist in the evacuation.
If the fire source is in the four-lane section, the temperature and visibility in the immersed tube and converging sections are within safe limits. Nearby individuals can evacuate through designated points. Vehicles downstream of the fire source in the four-lane section should exit the tunnel quickly.
While the entrance section of the road has a slightly lower visibility compared to the rest of the road section, it still exceeds the critical risk value of 10 m. At the exit section, the temperature is relatively high but remains below the critical risk value of 60 °C. It is advisable for vehicles to use the right lane during evacuations. In firefighting and rescue operations, attention should be given to measures on the roadside, including deploying exhaust fire trucks to control smoke, increase visibility, reduce the temperature, and assist vehicles and personnel in their escape.