Next Article in Journal
Study on Bearing Capacity of Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Embedded Parts
Next Article in Special Issue
Al2O3-Phosphate Bioceramic Fabrication via Spark Plasma Sintering-Reactive Synthesis: In Vivo and Microbiological Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles Supported over Graphene-like Material Composite as a Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ternary Ni-Ce-Mg-O Composites: In-Depth Optical Spectroscopy Study and Catalytic Performance in CO Oxidation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhancing Photocatalytic Pollutant Degradation through S-Scheme Electron Transfer and Sulfur Vacancies in BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 Heterojunctions

J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(7), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070280
by Ge-Ge Zheng, Xin Lin †, Zhen-Xing Wen, Yu-Hao Ding, Rui-Hui Yun, Gaurav Sharma *, Amit Kumar * and Florian J. Stadler *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(7), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7070280
Submission received: 21 June 2023 / Revised: 4 July 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The text presents a well-structured and coherent description of the research conducted on the synthesis and optimization of BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 composite S-type heterojunctions for efficient photocatalytic degradation of pollutants.

The text could also provide more information on the specific pollutants that were tested in the photocatalytic degradation experiments, as well as the concentration and volume of the pollutants used (in Materials and Methods).

Finally, the authors could discuss the potential practical applications of their findings, such as the potential for scaling up the synthesis of the composite photocatalysts for industrial wastewater treatment.

It would be beneficial to include references or comparisons with other similar studies.

Line 171, reference this equation.

Line 201: Authors write: "...and the transmittance (T)." but in the formula in line 181 the transmittance does not appear, please clarify.

Line 240: Here appears the abbreviation ZIS but also ZISS, what is the difference between them. In Figure 2 I don't find ZIS.

Line 311: nanoflower structure composed = nanoflower structure is composed

Line: 335, name the abbreviation "M-S plots", please added.

The text presents a well-structured and coherent description of the research conducted on the synthesis and optimization of BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 composite S-type heterojunctions for efficient photocatalytic degradation of pollutants.

The text could also provide more information on the specific pollutants that were tested in the photocatalytic degradation experiments, as well as the concentration and volume of the pollutants used (in Materials and Methods).

Finally, the authors could discuss the potential practical applications of their findings, such as the potential for scaling up the synthesis of the composite photocatalysts for industrial wastewater treatment.

It would be beneficial to include references or comparisons with other similar studies.

Line 171, reference this equation.

Line 201: Authors write: "...and the transmittance (T)." but in the formula in line 181 the transmittance does not appear, please clarify.

Line 240: Here appears the abbreviation ZIS but also ZISS, what is the difference between them. In Figure 2 I don't find ZIS.

Line 311: nanoflower structure composed = nanoflower structure is composed

Line: 335, name the abbreviation "M-S plots", please added.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The current manuscript discussed "Enhancing Photocatalytic Pollutant Degradation through S-2 Scheme Electron Transfer and Sulfur Vacancies in 3 BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 Heterojunctions formation by chemical and hydrothermal methods. Authors explained the fabrication of BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 heterojunctions and characterization via various techniques. The photocatalytic properties were studied for selected photodegradation materials like Evans blue and ciprofloxacin. The article is well written and properly structured however, there are some concerns which needs to be addressed before considering the manuscript for publication.

 

There are some comments:

 

1.    The authors should add a table and compare different ferrite materials reported in literature used for similar purpose and explain how their heterojunction is novel and better.

2.    The selection of Evans blue and ciprofloxacin was made on what bases, why not similar class of materials were selected for better comparison.? It is recommended to use at least one pollutant of similar class either from Evans blue or from ciprofloxacin and present a better comparison.

3.    The composition of BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 should be clearly mentioned. It is not clear which component clearly enhances the photocatalytic activity of the material, Authors should describe, why a particular composition was successful for photodegradation.

4.    The authors should also provide XRD and XPS of post photodegradation samples to compare the differences in composition and oxidation states before and after the photo degradation experiments.

5.    The EDX elemental composition should be mentioned in table form.

6.    It will be of great interest to provide the TOC analysis of the photocatalysis process, as mentioned that BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 heterojunction is a potential material for studying degradation of organic dye and pharmaceutical pollutants.

 

Minor editing, rephrasing is required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have considered my comments. This paper could be accepted for publication.

Author Response

thank you, no changes done based on your comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed all the concerns properly .

Author Response

thank you, no changes done based on your comments.

Back to TopTop