Next Article in Journal
Grape Pomace in Ewes Diet Affects Metagenomic Profile, Volatile Compounds and Biogenic Amines Contents of Ripened Cheese
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Starter Cultures and Type of Casings on the Microbial Features and Volatile Profile of Fermented Sausages
Previous Article in Journal
Thermophilic Water Gas Shift Reaction at High Carbon Monoxide and Hydrogen Partial Pressures in Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius KP1013
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flavor and Functional Analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum Fermented Apricot Juice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of the Chemical Properties of Pineapple Vinegar and Mixed Pineapple and Dragon Fruit Vinegar

Fermentation 2022, 8(11), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110597
by Antika Boondaeng 1, Sumaporn Kasemsumran 1, Kraireuk Ngowsuwan 1, Pilanee Vaithanomsat 1, Waraporn Apiwatanapiwat 1, Chanaporn Trakunjae 1,2, Phornphimon Janchai 1, Sunee Jungtheerapanich 1 and Nanthavut Niyomvong 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Fermentation 2022, 8(11), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8110597
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flavor and Aroma in the Fermented Food)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (New Reviewer)

This work is well designed, presented and discussed

-Why the authors did not investigate the fermentation of pineapple juice with Dragon peel juice only. This should be conducted based on the decreasing the final cost of end product.

L148 Expand TPC

L315-319 should be moved to Table 4 as title and footnote and clarify match at Table 4??

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report (New Reviewer)

The subject investigated is very interesting and gives opportunities for future use of pineapple and dragon fruit to produce vinegar. There are just 2 issues that I questioned and need to be improved:

 1.       It is not clear how were the vinegar fermentations performed? What kind of deposits were used? Were there replicas?

It seems essential to have duplicates or triplicates, but it is not clear if this was done. For small fermentation volumes, there are significant variation between replicas, therefore it is necessary to have replicates to increase the reliability of the results.

 2.       In “Materials and Methods” there is reference to the analysis of viability of microorganisms by colony count. Are the results shown? Was the viability followed through all fermentation? It would be very interesting to see how.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript's topic seems interesting, the chemical characterization of vinegar from pineapple and vinegar mixed from pineapple and dragon fruits. However, it needs significant language review and more work on the logical schema of results presentation, e.g., "Comparison of the chemical properties of pineapple vinegar and mixed pineapple and dragon fruit vinegar". I propose a transformation title: "Comparison of the chemical properties of vinegar from pineapple, and vinegar with the juice of dragon fruit".

Abstract: The schema of the abstract should contain a brief description of the aim of the research, methods, results with numerical findings and a short conclusion.

Moreover, "keywords" are so unspecific that it will be difficult to search for this article. 

Line 52-80: this big part of text has no reference.

The same line 134-139, no reference for mentioned methods 1) ethanol determination, 2) microorganisms counting, 3) acetic acid determination, 4) color of fruit.

L 179: chemical standards should be listed in the separate paragraph "Chemicals"

Table 2 no statistics.

Also no statists in Table 3, moreover, why only results are presented for day 0 and 20?

Table 4: only 6 compounds have been identified in the vinegars?  Volatile compounds in red wine vinegars obtained by submerged and surface acetification in different woods - ScienceDirect

and there is no value results for volatiles? only identification 

Author Response

We thank for your advice and suggestions, Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript “Comparison of the chemical properties of pineapple vinegar and mixed pineapple and dragon fruit vinegar” is overall with scientific significance and interesting results. The results are rational and contain some interesting information that could be useful in making advances in developing novel functional vinegar products. The manuscript can be improved on some specific editing which are listed below:

1.       Abstract: Please specify what is “degraded pineapples”?

2.       Abstract: it difficult to understand “the addition of dragon fruit juice to the peel” … Please revise this sentence.

3.       Introduction is too long, and some contents are not concentrated on the topic. I suggest reducing size of the introduction and remove some basic information, for example, introduction of vinegar in the third paragraph.

4.       Legends under Figure 1 and Figure 2: please supplement the missing information after pineapple wine.

5.       How to prepare the dragon fruit peel juice? Is composition of the juice stable and repeatable by each preparation?

6.       Although addition of dragon fruit peel increases overall antioxidant activity, is it contains residue or insoluble fragments?

7.       Conclusion: “Owing to the high concentration of acetic acid in vinegar, it is considered a functional food with many benefits, such as the control of blood sugar and blood pressure.” This is a predication which is not appropriate in the conclusion section.

Author Response

We thank for your advice and suggestions, Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The work is interesting and can be accepted.

Author Response

We thank for your comment 

The Authors

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Still, the presentation of GC-MS results is not acceptable. Have authors presented peak areas, concentrations or % of compounds' contribution in the total amount of volatiles? The information in table 4 is useless. 

Author Response

Comment from reviewer

Still, the presentation of GC-MS results is not acceptable. Have authors presented peak areas, concentrations or % of compounds' contribution in the total amount of volatiles? The information in table 4 is useless.

-As your suggestion, we have already added % peak areas.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have done extensive revisions. I have no more comments.

Back to TopTop