Next Article in Journal
Regenerated Fibers from Rennet-Treated Casein Micelles during Acidification
Previous Article in Journal
Dual pH- and Thermo-Sensitive Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) Nanogels for Curcumin Delivery: Swelling–Deswelling Behavior and Phase Transition Mechanism
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/gels9070537
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Single-Entity Electrochemistry in the Agarose Hydrogel: Observation of Enhanced Signal Uniformity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio

by
Jaedo Na
1,
Kyungsoon Park
2,* and
Seong Jung Kwon
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Chemistry and Cosmetics, Jeju Nation University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2023, 9(7), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070537
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 30 June 2023 / Published: 2 July 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
For the first time, single-entity electrochemistry (SEE) was demonstrated in a hydrogel matrix. SEE involves the investigation of the electrochemical characteristics of individual nanoparticles (NPs) by observing the signal generated when a single NP, suspended in an aqueous solution, collides with an electrode and triggers catalytic reactions. Challenges associated with SEE in electrolyte-containing solutions such as signal variation due to NP aggregation and noise fluctuation caused by convection phenomena can be addressed by employing a hydrogel matrix. The polymeric hydrogel matrix acts as a molecular sieve, effectively filtering out unexpected signals generated by aggregated NPs, resulting in more uniform signal observations compared to the case in a solution. Additionally, the hydrogel environment can reduce the background current fluctuations caused by natural convection and other factors such as impurities, facilitating easier signal analysis. Specifically, we performed SEE of platinum (Pt) NPs for hydrazine oxidation within the agarose hydrogel to observe the electrocatalytic reaction at a single NP level. The consistent porous structure of the agarose hydrogel leads to differential diffusion rates between individual NPs and reactants, resulting in variations in signal magnitude, shape, and frequency. The changes in the signal were analyzed in response to gel concentration variations.

1. Introduction

In recent years, single-entity electrochemistry (SEE) has gained significant attention as a powerful approach to studying the characteristics of nanomaterials at the individual level, rather than averaged properties as ensembles [1,2,3,4,5,6]. SEE has found application in various fields, including the investigation of electrocatalytic properties or mechanisms of metal [7,8,9] and metal oxide [10,11] nanoparticles (NPs), studies on soft NPs like emulsions [12,13], and examination of single biomaterials such as enzymes or cells [14,15].
Among the various nanomaterials, metal NPs have been widely used in many research fields owing to their attractive properties, which include a large surface-to-volume ratio, chemical reactivity, and size-dependent optical and electronic properties [16,17,18]. These enhanced characteristics of NPs compared with bulk materials can be applied to various modern scientific applications, such as electronic devices, sensors, medicine, spectrometry (such as Raman scattering enhancers), and catalysts [19,20,21,22]. Among these applications of NPs, its electrocatalytic effect has received a tremendous amount of attention. Because electrocatalysis is an essential key to the improvement of energy conversion and energy storage (such as oxygen reduction reaction (ORR)/oxygen evolution reaction (OER)/hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)), batteries, chemical synthesis, and electrochemical sensing systems [23,24,25]. It has been shown that the electrochemical activities of NPs are greatly altered depending on their size, shape, composition, and orientation. Therefore, numerous research efforts have been made to understand the electrocatalytic properties of NPs at the level of individual NPs and optimize them for practical applications.
In the SEE method, an electrode applying a predetermined voltage is immersed in a solution containing nanomaterials such as NPs. The NPs diffuse within the solution and eventually collide with the electrode, leading to the observation of a signal triggered by a specific electrochemical reaction induced by the NPs. However, the small current generated by a single NP is often challenging to distinguish from noise signals. Therefore, to obtain distinguishable signals, in other words, to enhance the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, fast electrochemical reactions or small electrodes such as ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) are commonly employed. Although use of the UMEs has significantly reduced noise levels, residual fluctuations in noise current ranging from a few to tens of pA still exist. These fluctuations can be attributed to various physical and electrical factors, including the natural convection of the electrolyte solution [26,27].
Hydrogel, a three-dimensional crosslinked network polymer, has the ability to absorb and retain a significant amount of water while maintaining its structural solidity. It consists of a hydrophilic polymer chain with a high water content, typically ranging from 90% to 99% [28]. Recently, hydrogel has emerged as a valuable material in electrochemical applications due to its distinctive properties, such as large water content [29], biocompatibility [30,31], tunable swelling behavior [32,33], and easy integration with electrodes and active components [34,35,36]. Hydrogels serve as a sensing platform in electrochemical sensors, enabling selective detection of analytes [37,38,39]. Additionally, they provide useful applications in energy storage devices as electrodes or separators, facilitating enhanced charge storage and rapid ion diffusion [40,41]. In the realm of electrochemical actuators, hydrogel acts as an artificial muscle, responding to electric potential and generating mechanical work [42,43]. Moreover, hydrogel is employed in electrocatalysis, providing a supporting matrix for electrocatalytic materials to enhance various reactions [44,45]. The hydrogel is applied not only in the electrochemical field, but also in various fields such as drug delivery system [46], mechanics [47,48], and environmental fields [49].
Recent studies by Park et al. have demonstrated that, when hydrogel is used as solid electrolytes in electrochemical experiments, the influence of convection can be reduced, simplifying the mass transfer of reactants [35,36]. This finding suggests that it holds potential for improving the S/N ratio in the SEE by mitigating noise from convection in electrochemical measurements and simplifying the mass transfer model.
If the SEE is performed in a hydrogel matrix instead of a conventional solution media, it can offer several advantages. Colloidal NPs may exhibit decreased stability in the electrolyte solution caused by the agglomeration of each particle [50]. Although stabilizing agents (capping agents) are used in the synthetic process of NP to control the growth and to prevent aggregation, excessive use of these capping agents can affect the catalytic ability of the NP surface. In addition, NPs are often agglomerated together in the electrolyte solution. In such cases, even with the use of uniform NPs, the magnitude of the signal, which is proportional to the size of the NPs, can be interrupted due to the NP’s aggregation. However, the hydrogel matrix acts as a molecular sieve, effectively filtering out the aggregated NPs. This results in a more uniform signal that accurately represents the size distribution of the NPs. Additionally, the gel environment minimizes background current fluctuations caused by other factors, such as impurities, thereby facilitating easier signal analysis and increasing the S/N ratio.
In this paper, for the first time, the SEE of a single NP was observed in a hydrogel matrix. We investigated the effects of hydrogel incorporation on the mass transfer of NPs in the context of SEE. By examining the changes in magnitude, shape, and frequency of SEE signals depending on the composition of the hydrogel matrix, we elucidated the potential of hydrogel-based SEE for enhanced signal analysis and improved understanding of individual nanomaterials.

2. Results and Discussion

The hydrogel can be considered as a network of cross-linked polymer chains which possess a wide-spreading “pore size” or “mesh size” ranging from 1 to 900 nm depending on the agarose concentration [51]. Such porous structures can affect the mass transfer rate of materials or cause additional overvoltage, which may affect the rate of electrochemical reactions. Thus, to validate the electrochemical behavior within the agarose gel and determine the optimal potential for single-entity electrochemistry (SEE), electrochemistry for hydrazine oxidation at various electrodes was investigated in the agarose hydrogel.
First of all, cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were conducted using Pt and Au ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) in both aqueous solution and 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel to assess the electrocatalytic properties depending on the electrode materials and diffusional properties between the two media (Figure 1a,b). The CV results revealed that the Pt UME exhibited a lower onset potential for hydrazine oxidation compared to the Au UME, irrespective of the medium employed. At a potential around 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), the Pt UME demonstrated an electrocatalytic current resulting from the hydrazine oxidation, while the Au UME did not. This difference in electrocatalytic behavior motivated the selection of this potential for subsequent SEE analyses. For SEE of metal NPs using electrocatalytic amplification, it should be noted that the appropriate electrode potential needs to be selected. This potential should give rise to the maximum current for the particle material, while the electrode exhibits a minimum current response at the given electrocatalytic reaction.
In terms of steady-state currents, a noticeable disparity was observed between the aqueous solution and the agarose hydrogel. While the onset potentials remained similar, the steady-state current levels in the agarose hydrogel were lower compared to those in the aqueous solution. The steady-state current at an UME is directly proportional to the diffusion of reactants to the electrode surface, suggesting reduction in the diffusion coefficient and subsequent decrease in current within the gel matrix. This observation was further supported by the gradual decline in steady-state current with increasing concentration of the agarose hydrogel (Figure 1c,d).
The steady-state current in the disk-type UME is obtained as follow [52,53]:
I s s , U M E = 4 F D h y d C h y d r U M E
where Dhyd is the diffusion coefficient of hydrazine, Chyd is the concentration of hydrazine, and rUME is the radius of UME. These results can be derived from the hindered mobility of the redox molecule in agarose gel, which is assumed to be caused by steric interaction between solutes and agarose gel fibers [54]. The diffusion coefficients of hydrazine, calculated from the steady-state current, were summarized in Table 1. Notably, the diffusion coefficient of hydrazine in the 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel was lower (approximately 84%) than that of in aqueous solution.
In conclusion, it is considered possible to perform SEE in agarose gel due to significant differences in catalytic properties between Au and Pt despite a slight decrease in the diffusion coefficient observed in agarose gel.
As depicted in Scheme 1, SEE of Pt NPs was conducted in both aqueous solution (liquid electrolyte) and agarose hydrogels (solid electrolyte). To enable the SEE within a hydrogel matrix, it is imperative that nanoparticles (NPs) can readily penetrate the hydrogel structure. The pore size of the prepared hydrogel is expected to range from tens to hundreds of nanometers, depending on the concentration, ranging from 2.0 to 0.5 wt%, as reported in the literature [51]. Therefore, it is thought that the ~50 nm of Pt NPs may or may not penetrate the hydrogel depending on the pore size of the hydrogel.
The magnitude and frequency of the current signal of the SEE were investigated at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel, compared to the result in aqueous solution. (Figure 2). Owing to the slow diffusion within the agarose hydrogel compared to the solution, the agarose hydrogel pre-equilibrated with a high concentration of Pt NP solution and hydrazine was used for the SEE. Specifically, the Pt NP concentration was 0.8 pM in the solution and 20 pM in the agarose hydrogel.
As shown in Figure 2a and consistent with previous studies, the SEE of Pt NPs exhibited a staircase current signal in the aqueous solution. Each current step implies a steady state current generated by individual Pt nanoparticles collided onto the Au electrode. The magnitude of the current signal and collisional frequency were calculated using the equations of previous studies [52,53]:
I s s , N P = 4 π l n 2 n F D h y d C h y d r N P
and
f P = 4 D N P C N P r U M E
where rNP is the radius of NP, the DNP is the diffusion coefficient of NP, and CNP is the concentration of NP.
The theoretical expectations and experimental observations of the signal magnitudes and frequencies are summarized in Table 2. The estimated values obtained from Equations (2) and (3) were 330 pA for the current step and 0.104 s−1 for the frequency in the liquid electrolyte. The experimentally obtained values were 495 (±338) pA and 0.028 s−1, respectively. The two values roughly coincide, but the experimentally observed data was slightly larger in current magnitude and lower in frequency, which is believed to be due to the occurrence of NP aggregation in the solution. It has been reported that the aggregation of Pt NPs in hydrazine solution [50]. Therefore, the aggregation can lead to inconsistent signal magnitudes and a large coefficient of variation (68%). As a result, when attempting to predict the real size distribution of NPs based on the magnitude of the current signal, accurate predictions are challenging due to signal distortion caused by such aggregation in an electrolyte solution.
In the 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel (Figure 2b), a current step of 27 (±13) pA was observed. Considering only the decrease in the diffusion coefficient of hydrazine in the agarose hydrogel (84% from Table 1), the expected current magnitude in the solid electrolyte should be 278 pA. Hence, it is suspected that additional factors contribute to this phenomenon. Furthermore, triangular-shaped current responses were observed in the case of 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel, which deviates from the staircase response in the solution electrolyte. This triangular shape implies that the mass transfer of hydrazine is diminishing and ultimately restricted due to some reason. We speculate that this limitation is due to the blocking effect of the N2 gas, which is a product of the oxidation reaction of hydrazine. The oxidation reaction of hydrazine can be represented as follows:
N 2 H 4 → N 2 + 4 H + + 4 e -
Therefore, the generated N2 gas has greater difficulty in escaping from the NP surface within the solid electrolyte compared to the liquid electrolyte. As a result, it is hypothesized that the N2 gas hinders the mass transfer of the reagent, leading to a decrease in the current signal.
The pore size of the prepared hydrogel may decrease as the concentration of hydrogel increases. As a result, the magnitude of the SEE signal was gradually reduced, and small signals resembling spike shapes were observed at 1.0 and 1.5% (Figure 2c,d). Finally, no observable signal was obtained at concentrations above 2.0 wt% (Figure 2e). Previous studies on the pore size of agarose gel show that when it reaches 2.0 wt%, the pore size decreases a lot compared to when it is 0.5 wt% (Table 3) [55,56,57,58]. Consequently, since the pore size of 2.0 wt% is similar to or smaller than the Pt NP size of 50 nm, the Pt NPs are difficult to move freely in the gel network, resulting in the disappearance of the signal.
Furthermore, in the 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel, the collision frequency decreased to less than 1/10 compared to that in the solution electrolyte. As the concentration of the agarose hydrogel increases, this reduction continues. This indicates that the diffusion of NPs is hindered within the agarose hydrogel, resulting in a slower rate of diffusion (Figure 3a)
Despite the reduction in current signal magnitude due to the decreased diffusion coefficient, the uniformity of signals was relatively improved in the agarose hydrogel since NP aggregation was less pronounced in the agarose hydrogel.
The appearance of aggregation results in the formation of larger NPs, and the average particle size increases while the NP concentration decreases. Consequently, an increase in the average signal magnitude and a decrease in collisional frequency in SEE are observed. As listed in Table 4, in the aqueous solution, the current magnitude and frequency during the 200–400 s time range decreased and increased from 330 to 1050 and from 0.075 to 0.015, respectively, compared to the values in the 0–200 s time range. This observation aligns with the expected effect of the NP aggregation mentioned earlier. On the other hand, in the 0.5 wt% agarose gel, there was no significant change in the current magnitude and frequency between the 200–400 s and 0–200 s time range.
Therefore, the uniformity of the current signal can be assessed by the coefficient of variation of the current magnitude, which increased to 47% in the agarose hydrogel compared to 68% in the solution (Figure 3b). In this regard, it is noteworthy that the entangled network fibers of the hydrogel not only affect the diffusion properties but also serve as a molecular body that prevents NPs aggregation inside the hydrogel.
In the agarose hydrogel environment, mass transport is reduced, especially that due to convection, and background current fluctuations caused by factors such as impurities are minimized, leading to a decrease in the magnitude of noise. As shown in Table 5, the actual magnitude of noise significantly decreased in the agarose hydrogel, resulting in an enhanced signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. The S/N ratio was calculated by dividing the magnitude of the current response by the background current fluctuation. The improved S/N ratio can benefit the detection of NPs, especially small ones with low signal levels.

3. Conclusions

For the first time, the single-entity electrochemistry (SEE) of Pt nanoparticles (NPs) was conducted in a solid electrolyte, such as agarose hydrogel. In the 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel, the diffusion of NPs and reagent was slower compared to that in the liquid electrolyte, resulting in a decrease in signal magnitude and frequency. However, it can offer several advantages. The agarose hydrogel matrix excludes signals generated by aggregated NPs, resulting in more uniform signals. By minimizing background current fluctuations caused by factors like natural convection and impurities, the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is increased, making signal analysis more convenient. These change in current response was investigated as a function of agarose hydrogel concentration.
This study demonstrates that the improved S/N ratio and uniformity of signal in solid electrolytes can be utilized for the observation of SEE of NPs with small signal magnitudes, which are difficult to observe in liquid electrolytes. It also provides inspiration for future investigations into the electrochemical behavior of NPs in various solid electrolytes such as a hydrogel.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents

All chemicals used as received. Agarose (Low Electroendosmosis), platinum nanosphere (Pt NP, 50 nm), hydrazine (N2H4), potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4), potassium phosphate dibasic (K2HPO4) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultrapure water (>18 MΩ, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was used in all experiments. Gold (Au, 99.99%, diameter 10 μm) and Pt (99.99%, diameter 10 μm) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA).

4.2. Characterization of Pt NPs

The size of the Pt NPs was characterized using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. As shown in Figure 4, the analyzed metal part size of Pt NP by TEM was 45 (±5) nm and the hydrodynamic diameter of Pt NP by DLS was 57 (±14) nm in diameter. The diameter from the DLS analysis was larger than that measured from the TEM images. This difference seems to be due to the hydrodynamic environment during DLS measurements and the dry environment at TEM measurements. The concentration of Pt nanoparticles (NPs) was estimated by dividing the concentration of the Pt precursor by the number of Pt atoms present in the average size of NP from the TEM image. The estimated concentration of the stock solution of Pt NP was 80 pM.

4.3. Preparation of Agarose Hydrogel

Various concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 wt% in water) of agarose solutions were prepared in a flask connected to the reflux tube. Agarose solutions were heated up to 90 °C for complete dissolution. The agarose solutions were put into a vacuum chamber to remove air bubbles. After, the solution was placed in a silicone mold and slowly cooled to room temperature to harden it. The hardened gel was cut into 1 cm cubes and stored in distilled water. The pore size of agarose hydrogel can be measured in the various methods previously studied such as DNA mobilities [55], absorbance change [56], surface fraction change [57], and scanning electron cryo-microscopy (Cryo-SEM) [58]. According to these methods, The pore diameter of 0.5~2.0 wt% agarose hydrogel can be estimated to be 250~40 nm [55], 450~40 nm [56], 280~6 nm [57], or 330~150 nm [58], as listed in Table 3.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) measurements were conducted at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel (Figure 5). A thinly sliced and dried agarose hydrogel was used as a sample for measurement. As shown in Figure 5, peaks were obtained at the same location regardless of agarose concentration. The broad absorption band at 3306 cm−1 was attributed to the stretching vibration mode of -OH groups. The band at 2898 cm−1 was related to the stretching vibration mode of -CH2 groups. The band at 1660 cm−1 was attributed to the stretching vibration of the bound H2O. Peaks at 1470 cm−1 and 1378 cm−1 were related to the bending vibration of the -CH2 and -CH3 groups, respectively. The vibration of the covalent sulfate group is indicated by the weak band at 1244 cm−1. Broad bands at 1160 cm−1 and 1077 cm−1 were related to the vibration of C-O-C groups about the glycosidic linkage. These peaks correspond with the known peaks for agarose gel [59,60].
For electrochemical measurement, a cubic agarose hydrogel was soaked in 1 mL of Pt NP stock solution for 72 h until the Pt NPs were reached in equilibrium between the agarose hydrogel and solution. The concentration of Pt NPs in agarose hydrogel was estimated at ~40 pM, which is half the concentration of the stock solution. Then, the agarose hydrogel containing Pt NPs was immersed in 1 mL 100 mM phosphate buffer (PB) solution containing 10 mM hydrazine for 8 h. After two equilibrium steps, for example, the 0.5 wt% agarose gel is considered to contain ~20 pM Pt NP, ~5 mM hydrazine, and 50 mM PB [37,38]. The hydrogels before and after equilibrium with Pt NPs and hydrazine solution are shown in Figure 6a.

4.4. Preparation of UMEs

UMEs were fabricated as previously reported [7,10,61]. First, one side of the borosilicate glass tube was sealed with a torch. A 10 µm diameter of metal (Au or Pt) wire was put into a sealed borosilicate glass. The opposite side of the glass tube was connected to the vacuum pump. The sealed side of the glass tube was sealed using nichrome wire under vacuum. Next, the remained metal wire was connected to the lead line using silver epoxy. The sealed glass was ground with sandpaper to expose the metal surface, and polished with alumina powder for the mirror surface of the electrode.

4.5. Instruments

The electrochemical experiments were performed by using a CHI 750e potentiostat (CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) with three electrode cells placed in a Faraday cage. The three-electrode system consisted of UME as a working electrode, Pt wire as a counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl 1 M KCl as a reference electrode. TEM images were obtained using a JEM-3010 (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). DLS analysis was performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). FT-IR was preformed using a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.6. Electrochemical Cell

All electrochemical measurements were performed in a three-electrode cell system. A 50 mM phosphate buffer (PB) solution containing 5 mM hydrazine was used for an electrolyte solution. Agarose hydrogel was placed in electrolyte solution and the working electrode connected to the agarose hydrogel. Pt counter electrode and Ag/AgCl 1 M KCl reference electrode were placed outside agarose hydrogel in solution as shown in Figure 6b.
When the measurement in 0 wt% agarose hydrogel, we used 50 mM PB containing 5 mM hydrazine solution for the electrolyte, and all three electrodes were placed in the electrolyte solution without agarose gel, and the Pt NPs were injected into the solution after chronoamperometric measurement had started.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.P. and S.J.K.; methodology: J.N. and S.J.K.; software: J.N. and S.J.K.; validation: J.N., K.P. and S.J.K.; formal analysis: J.N. and S.J.K.; investigation: J.N. and S.J.K.; resource: K.P. and S.J.K.; writing—original draft preparation: S.J.K.; writing—review and editing: J.N., K.P. and S.J.K.; supervision: S.J.K.; project administration: S.J.K.; funding acquisition: K.P. and S.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C1013995) and funded by the Ministry of Education (2022R1I1A3072996). K.P. acknowledges the support from the Basic Science Research Program of the Research Institute for Basic Sciences (RIBS) of Jeju National University through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1A6A1A10072987).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the editor and reviewers for improving our work with constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stark, W.J.; Stoessel, P.R.; Wohlleben, W.; Hafner, A.J.C.S.R. Industrial applications of nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5793–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Van Broekhuizen, P.; van Broekhuizen, F.; Cornelissen, R.; Reijnders, L. Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bauer, L.A.; Birenbaum, N.S.; Meyer, G.J. Biological applications of high aspect ratio nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liebel, M.; Calderon, I.; Pazos-Perez, N.; van Hulst, N.F.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A. Widefield SERS for High-Throughput Nanoparticle Screening. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202200072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, J.; Lim, B.; Lee, E.P.; Xia, Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of platinum nanocrystals for catalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Nano Today 2009, 4, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Spendelow, J.S.; Wieckowski, A. Electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction and small alcohol oxidation in alkaline media. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2654–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xiao, X.; Bard, A.J. Observing single nanoparticle collisions at an ultramicroelectrode by electrocatalytic amplification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9610–9612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, Y.G.; Rees, N.V.; Compton, R.G. The electrochemical detection and characterization of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4219–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, H.; Fan, F.R.F.; Bard, A.J. Observation of discrete au nanoparticle collisions by electrocatalytic amplification using Pt ultramicroelectrode surface modification. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2671–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kwon, S.J.; Fan, F.R.F.; Bard, A.J. Observing iridium oxide (IrOx) single nanoparticle collisions at ultramicroelectrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13165–13167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernando, A.; Parajuli, F.; Alpuche-Aviles, M.A. Observation of individual semiconducting nanoparticle collisions by stochastic photoelectrochemical currents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10894–10897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, B.K.; Kim, J.; Bard, A.J. Electrochemistry of a single attoliter emulsion droplet in collisions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2343–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, B.K.; Boika, A.; Kim, J.; Dick, J.E.; Bard, A.J. Characterizing emulsions by observation of single droplet collisions—Attoliter electrochemical reactors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4849–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dick, J.E.; Hilterbrand, A.T.; Boika, A.; Upton, J.W.; Bard, A.J. Electrochemical detection of a single cytomegalovirus at an ultramicroelectrode and its antibody anchoring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5303–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dick, J.E.; Renault, C.; Bard, A.J. Observation of single-protein and DNA macromolecule collisions on ultramicroelectrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8376–8379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Emory, S.R.; Haskins, W.E.; Nie, S. Direct observation of size-dependent optical enhancement in single metal nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8009–8010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Balamurugan, B.; Maruyama, T. Evidence of an enhanced interband absorption in Au nanoparticles: Size-dependent electronic structure and optical properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 143105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Shankar, S.S.; Rai, A.; Ankamwar, B.; Singh, A.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. Biological synthesis of triangular gold nanoprisms. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wei, H.; Hao, F.; Huang, Y.; Wang, W.; Nordlander, P.; Xu, H. Polarization dependence of surface-enhanced Raman scattering in gold nanoparticle−nanowire systems. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2497–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wilczewska, A.Z.; Niemirowicz, K.; Markiewicz, K.H.; Car, H. Nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmacol. Res. 2012, 64, 1020–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, C.; Yu, C. Detection of chemical pollutants in water using gold nanoparticles as sensors: A review. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yahya, R.; Shah, A.; Kokab, T.; Ullah, N.; Hakeem, M.K.; Hayat, M.; Shah, I. Electrochemical Sensor for detection and degradation studies of ethyl violet dye. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 34154–34165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xie, C.; Niu, Z.; Kim, D.; Li, M.; Yang, P. Surface and interface control in nanoparticle catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2019, 120, 1184–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Baek, D.S.; Joo, S.H. Non-siliceous ordered mesoporous materials via nanocasting for small molecule conversion electrocatalysis. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2022, 43, 1156–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luo, X.; Morrin, A.; Killard, A.J.; Smyth, M.R. Application of nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Electroanal. Int. J. Devoted Fundam. Pract. Asp. Electroanal. 2006, 18, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gao, X.; Lee, J.; White, H.S. Natural convection at microelectrodes. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1541–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Novev, J.K.; Compton, R.G. Natural convection effects in electrochemical systems. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 7, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mateescu, A.; Wang, Y.; Dostalek, J.; Jonas, U. Thin hydrogel films for optical biosensor applications. Membranes 2012, 2, 40–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, N.; Wu, X.S. Preparation and characterization of agarose hydrogel nanoparticles for protein and peptide drug delivery. Pharm. Dev. 1997, 2, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernández-Cossío, S.; León-Mateos, A.; Sampedro, F.G.; Oreja, M.T.C. Biocompatibility of agarose gel as a dermal filler: Histologic evaluation of subcutaneous implants. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 2007, 120, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zarrintaj, P.; Manouchehri, S.; Ahmadi, Z.; Saeb, M.R.; Urbanska, A.M.; Kaplan, D.L.; Mozafari, M. Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 187, 66–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hayashi, A.; Kanzaki, T. Swelling of agarose gel and its related changes. Food Hydrocoll. 1987, 1, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rochas, C.; Hecht, A.M.; Geissler, E. Swelling properties of agarose gels. J. Chim. Phys. 1996, 93, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.F.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.L.; Shen, X.C.; Lu, Z.X.; Pang, D.W.; Wong, K.Y. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of heme proteins entrapped in agarose hydrogel films in room-temperature ionic liquids. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9260–9266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, B.K.; Park, K. Mass Transport Properties and Influence of Natural Convection for Voltammetry at the Agarose Hydrogel Interface. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Han, J.; Jang, S.; Kim, B.K.; Park, K. Electrochemical study of agarose hydrogels for natural convection on macroelectrodes and ultramicroelectrodes. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2023, 14, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ko, S. Multifunctional surface coating using chitosan and its chemical functionalization. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2022, 43, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reddy, S.M.; Sette, G.; Phan, Q. Electrochemical probing of selective haemoglobin binding in hydrogel-based molecularly imprinted polymers. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 9203–9208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Maity, S.; Parshi, N.; Prodhan, C.; Chaudhuri, K.; Ganguly, J. Characterization of a fluorescent hydrogel synthesized using chitosan, polyvinyl alcohol and 9-anthraldehyde for the selective detection and discrimination of trace Fe3+ and Fe2+ in water for live-cell imaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 193, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shi, Y.; Peng, L.; Yu, G. Nanostructured conducting polymer hydrogels for energy storage applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 12796–12806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, W.; Feng, P.; Chen, J.; Zhao, B. Flexible energy storage systems based on electrically conductive hydrogels. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 88, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ismail, Y.A.; Martínez, J.G.; Al Harrasi, A.S.; Kim, S.J.; Otero, T.F. Sensing characteristics of a conducting polymer/hydrogel hybrid microfiber artificial muscle. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160, 1180–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Z.; Fang, R.; Rong, Q.; Liu, M. Bioinspired nanocomposite hydrogels with highly ordered structures. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Muya, F.N.; Baker, P.G.; Iwuoha, E.I. Polysulfone hydrogel nanocomposite alkaline phosphatase biosensor for the detection of vanadium. Electrocatalysis 2020, 11, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zeng, X.; Wei, W.; Li, X.; Zeng, J.; Wu, L. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of hemoglobin entrapped in semi-interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel based on polyacrylamide and chitosan. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 71, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dewan, M.; Adhikari, A.; Dutta, K.; Chattopadhyay, D. Impact of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) on The Thermogelation Property and Drug Release Profile of Ophthalmic Formulations Based on Poloxamer 407. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202203528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ganguly, S.; Margel, S. 3D printed magnetic polymer composite hydrogels for hyperthermia and magnetic field driven structural manipulation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 131, 101574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Garai, S.; Chatterjee, D.; Mondal, B. Effect of rotation and cross thermal buoyancy on the nanofluidic transport around a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 2023, 35, 022011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Haleem, A.; Pan, J.M.; Shah, A.; Hussain, H.; He, W.D. A systematic review on new advancement and assessment of emerging polymeric cryogels for environmental sustainability and energy production. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 316, 123678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kleijn, S.E.; Serrano-Bou, B.; Yanson, A.I.; Koper, M.T. Influence of hydrazine-induced aggregation on the electrochemical detection of platinum nanoparticles. Langmuir 2013, 29, 2054–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maaloum, M.; Pernodet, N.; Tinland, B. Agarose gel structure using atomic force microscopy: Gel concentration and ionic strength effects. Electrophoresis 1998, 19, 1606–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kwon, S.J.; Zhou, H.; Fan, F.R.F.; Vorobyev, V.; Zhang, B.; Bard, A.J. Stochastic electrochemistry with electrocatalytic nanoparticles at inert ultramicroelectrodes—Theory and experiments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 5394–5402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R. Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  54. Johnson, E.M.; Berk, D.A.; Jain, R.K.; Deen, W.M. Hindered diffusion in agarose gels: Test of effective medium model. Biophys. 1996, 70, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Stellwagen, N.C. Agarose gel pore radii are not dependent on the casting buffer. Electrophoresis 1992, 13, 601–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Narayanan, J.; Xiong, J.Y.; Liu, X.Y. Determination of agarose gel pore size: Absorbance measurements vis a vis other techniques. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2006, 28, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cuccia, N.L.; Pothineni, S.; Wu, B.; Méndez Harper, J.; Burton, J.C. Pore-size dependence and slow relaxation of hydrogel friction on smooth surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11247–11256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jayawardena, I.; Turunen, P.; Garms, B.C.; Rowan, A.; Corrie, S.; Grøndahl, L. Evaluation of techniques used for visualisation of hydrogel morphology and determination of pore size distributions. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sathawong, S.; Sridach, W.; Techato, K.A. Recovery of Kraft lignin from OPEFB and using for lignin–agarose hydrogel. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mehta, G.K.; Kondaveeti, S.; Siddhanta, A.K. Facile synthesis of agarose-l-phenylalanine ester hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 2334–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xiao, X.; Fan, F.R.F.; Zhou, J.; Bard, A.J. Current transients in single nanoparticle collision events. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16669–16677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gels 09 00537 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the hydrazine oxidation using Au (black solid) and Pt (red dashed) UMEs in (a) solution or (b) 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel. Cyclic voltammograms of the hydrazine oxidation using (c) Au and (d) Pt UMEs at various concentrations of the agarose hydrogel (from 0.5 to 2.0 wt%). Both electrolytes contain 50 mM PB (pH 7.0) and 5 mM hydrazine. The scan rate was 50 mV.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the hydrazine oxidation using Au (black solid) and Pt (red dashed) UMEs in (a) solution or (b) 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogel. Cyclic voltammograms of the hydrazine oxidation using (c) Au and (d) Pt UMEs at various concentrations of the agarose hydrogel (from 0.5 to 2.0 wt%). Both electrolytes contain 50 mM PB (pH 7.0) and 5 mM hydrazine. The scan rate was 50 mV.
Gels 09 00537 g001
Gels 09 00537 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of difference diffusion pathway of Pt NP in (a) aqueous solution (b) agarose hydrogel.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of difference diffusion pathway of Pt NP in (a) aqueous solution (b) agarose hydrogel.
Gels 09 00537 sch001
Gels 09 00537 g002 550
Figure 2. Chronoamperometric curves for single Pt NP collision at the Au UME with different concentrations of the agarose hydrogel (a) 0 wt% (solution) (b) 0.5 wt% (c) 1.0 wt% (d) 1.5 wt% (e) 2.0 wt%. All electrolyte solutions contained 50 mM PB (pH 7.0) and 5 mM hydrazine. The Pt NP concentration was 0.8 pM at solution, and 20 pM at agarose hydrogel. The data acquisition time was 50 ms.
Figure 2. Chronoamperometric curves for single Pt NP collision at the Au UME with different concentrations of the agarose hydrogel (a) 0 wt% (solution) (b) 0.5 wt% (c) 1.0 wt% (d) 1.5 wt% (e) 2.0 wt%. All electrolyte solutions contained 50 mM PB (pH 7.0) and 5 mM hydrazine. The Pt NP concentration was 0.8 pM at solution, and 20 pM at agarose hydrogel. The data acquisition time was 50 ms.
Gels 09 00537 g002
Gels 09 00537 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Normalized collisional frequency and (b) current magnitude of the SEE signal as a function of agarose hydrogel concentration.
Figure 3. (a) Normalized collisional frequency and (b) current magnitude of the SEE signal as a function of agarose hydrogel concentration.
Gels 09 00537 g003
Gels 09 00537 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image, (b) size distribution of Pt NP measured with TEM, (c) size distribution of Pt NP measured with Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis. The average diameter (±standard deviation) is 45 (±5) nm with TEM and 57 (±14) nm with DLS.
Figure 4. (a) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image, (b) size distribution of Pt NP measured with TEM, (c) size distribution of Pt NP measured with Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis. The average diameter (±standard deviation) is 45 (±5) nm with TEM and 57 (±14) nm with DLS.
Gels 09 00537 g004
Gels 09 00537 g005 550
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of various concentration of the agarose hydrogel with (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1.0 wt%, (c) 1.5 wt%, and (d) 2.0 wt%.
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of various concentration of the agarose hydrogel with (a) 0.5 wt%, (b) 1.0 wt%, (c) 1.5 wt%, and (d) 2.0 wt%.
Gels 09 00537 g005
Gels 09 00537 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogels before (left, white) and after (right, black) equilibrium with Pt NPs and hydrazine solution. (b) electrochemical cell setup with hydrogel.
Figure 6. (a) 0.5 wt% agarose hydrogels before (left, white) and after (right, black) equilibrium with Pt NPs and hydrazine solution. (b) electrochemical cell setup with hydrogel.
Gels 09 00537 g006
Table
Table 1. Calculated diffusion coefficient of hydrazine at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel.
Table 1. Calculated diffusion coefficient of hydrazine at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel.
Concentration of
Agarose Hydrogel
(wt%)		Steady-State Current
(nA)		Calculated Diffusion Coefficient of Hydrazine a
(×10−6 cm2/s)
0 (solution)33.88.75
0.528.47.37
1.025.56.59
1.520.35.25
2.018.54.79
a Calculated by Equation (1).
Table
Table 2. Current magnitude and frequency of SEE signal.
Table 2. Current magnitude and frequency of SEE signal.
Concentration of
Agarose Hydrogel
(wt%)		Calculated
Current Magnitude a (pA)		Experimental
Current Magnitude (pA) (±SD)		Calculated
Frequency b
(s−1)		Experimental
Frequency
(s−1) (±SD)		Normalized
Frequency
(s−1·pM−1) (±SD)
0 (solution)330495 (±338)0.1040.028 (±0.003) c0.035 (±0.004)
0.527827 (±13)-0.066 (±0.026) d0.003 (±0.001)
1.024913 (±4)-0.028 (±0.012) d0.001 (±0.001)
1.519812 (±5)-0.011 (±0.003) d0.0005 (±0.0001)
2.0181--0 d0
a Calculated by Equation (2); b Calculated by Equation (3); c Observed at 0.8 pM of Pt NP; d Observed at 20 pM of Pt NP; SD: standard deviation.
Table
Table 3. Previous studies of pore size of agarose hydrogel as a function of concentration.
Table 3. Previous studies of pore size of agarose hydrogel as a function of concentration.
Method Based onPore Diameter (nm)Reference
0.5 wt%1.0 wt%1.5 wt%2.0 wt%
DNA mobilities change2501006040[55]
absorbance change4501507045[56]
surface fraction change28085716[57]
Cryo-SEM330230190150[58]
Table
Table 4. Average current magnitude and frequency of SEE signal at every 200 s range.
Table 4. Average current magnitude and frequency of SEE signal at every 200 s range.
Time Range
(s)		0 wt% (Solution)0.5 wt%
Experimental
Current Magnitude
(pA) (±SD)		Experimental
Frequency
(s−1)		Experimental
Current Magnitude
(pA) (±SD)		Experimental
Frequency
(s−1)
0~200330 (±180)0.07531.8 (±15)0.13
200–4001050 (±1140)0.01532.2 (±18)0.12
Table
Table 5. Comparison of the signal-to-noise ratio at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel.
Table 5. Comparison of the signal-to-noise ratio at various concentrations of agarose hydrogel.
Concentration of
Agarose Hydrogel
(wt%)		Experimental
Current Magnitude (pA)		Noise Level a
(pA)		Signal to Noise Ratio
(S/N Ratio)
0 (solution)495537.8
0.5270.6542
1.0130.7916
1.5120.8515
a Estimated from the background current fluctuation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Na, J.; Park, K.; Kwon, S.J. Single-Entity Electrochemistry in the Agarose Hydrogel: Observation of Enhanced Signal Uniformity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio. Gels 2023, 9, 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070537

AMA Style

Na J, Park K, Kwon SJ. Single-Entity Electrochemistry in the Agarose Hydrogel: Observation of Enhanced Signal Uniformity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio. Gels. 2023; 9(7):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Na, Jaedo, Kyungsoon Park, and Seong Jung Kwon. 2023. "Single-Entity Electrochemistry in the Agarose Hydrogel: Observation of Enhanced Signal Uniformity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio" Gels 9, no. 7: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9070537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop