Next Article in Journal
Improving the Leavening Effect of Ice like CO2 Gas Hydrates by Addition of Gelling Agents in Wheat Bread
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Application of Double Network Interpenetrating Colon Targeting Hydrogel Based on Konjac Glucomannan and N-Isopropylacrylamide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Textural and Rheological Properties of Sliceable Ketchup

1
Department of Food Science and Technology, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol P.O. Box 6616935391, Iran
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran P.O. Box 6616935391, Iran
3
Department of Statistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran P.O. Box 1489684511, Iran
4
Department of Food Processing, Research Institute of Food Science and Technology (RIFST), Mashhad P.O. Box 91775-1163, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2023, 9(3), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9030222
Submission received: 15 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023

Abstract

:
This study investigates the effect of different mixtures of gums [xanthan (Xa), konjac mannan (KM), gellan, and locust bean gum (LBG)] on the physical, rheological (steady and unsteady), and textural properties of sliceable ketchup. Each gum had an individually significant effect (p < 0.05) on viscosity; however, the addition of Xa in combination with other gums had a greater effect on viscosity. By increasing the use of Xa in ketchup formulations, the amount of syneresis decreased such that the lowest amount of syneresis related to the sample prepared with 50% Xa and 50% gellan. Although the use of different levels of gums did not have a significant effect on the brightness (L) and redness (a) indices (p < 0.05), the use of different ratios of gums had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the yellowness (b) index. The effect of different levels of gums used had a significant effect only on firmness (p < 0.05), and their effects on other textural parameters were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The ketchup samples produced had a shear-thinning behavior, and the Carreau model was the best model to describe the flow behavior. Based on unsteady rheology, G’ was higher than G” for all samples, and no crossover between G’ and G” was observed for any of the samples. The constant shear viscosity (η) was lower than the complex viscosity (η*), which showed the weak gel structure. The particle size distribution of the tested samples indicated the monodispersed distribution. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the viscoelastic properties and particle size distribution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, market research shows a growing trend in ketchup consumption [1]. It is predicted that in the period from 2021 to 2025, the market for this type of product will have an annual growth of about 2.64%. Ketchup is a flavored product containing various ingredients produced from a combination of fresh tomatoes or concentrates in the form of puree or pastes with sweeteners, salt, vinegar, and spices [2]. This type of sauce is a non-Newtonian semisolid material with a yield stress that exhibits thixotropic and viscoelastic properties [3,4,5,6].
Ketchup is consumed with various foods such as ready meals, pasta, pizza, etc. One of the most widely used uses for ketchup is with meat products, such as sausages, and since these two types of foods are commonly consumed together, their combined use can be a unique and attractive topic. Currently, a mixture of hydrocolloids is used to improve physical and rheological properties and reduce costs [7]. Commercial ketchup usually is thickened with tomato pulp powder [7], potato or corn starch [8,9], modified starch and carboxymethylcellulose [10], guar, and carboxymethylcellulose and Xa [3,11].
Ketchup for use in combination with sausages, as a final product, must have a high viscosity, and in terms of texture properties, it should be elastic and solid-state, and if cold, it can be cut and is sliceable like a sausage. Binary composite hydrogels of alginate and guar gum have been applied in the preparation of restructured pimento strips [12,13]. Therefore, due to their different physical and rheological nature from regular ketchup, the gel and sliceable texture of this type of ketchup are due to the application of gelling hydrocolloids such as Xa, gellan, KM, and LBG, especially considering their synergistic properties with each other [14].
Xanthan (Xa) gum shows high viscosity at low concentrations and has excellent stability in hot and acidic media [15]. The Xa has a highly pseudoplastic behavior and is synergistic with galactomannans (LBG and guar) and KM, increasing the viscosity of the solution. When Xa gum is mixed with KM gum or LBG, they form heat-reversible gels. The strongest gels in the presence of salt are 2:1 for the Xa–KM mixture and 1:1 for the Xa–LBG mixture [16,17]. Some researchers reported that in xanthan/konjac glucomannan mixtures, the maximum gel strength occurred at the ratio of xanthan to KGM = 4:6 without salt, and at 1:1 in the presence of sodium salt [18]. Renou et al. (2013) showed that a combination of Xa gum and locust bean gum showed strong rheological properties due to specific interactions between the two gums [19]. This follows the rubber elasticity theory for locust bean and Xa gums, as the increase in viscoelasticity due to heat treatment is related to the increase in crosslinking density between locust bean smooth areas and disordered regions of Xa gum [16]. Furthermore, a mixture of Xa gum and KM shows strong synergistic effects, and this effect is more seen in the ratio of 3:7 (KM:Xa) and offers the highest viscosity in all shear rates [20]. The KM gum also has an excellent synergistic effect as a strong gel with hydrocolloids, such as agar, Xa, and carrageenan, and creates heat-reversible gels. Various studies have reported the rheological properties and behaviors of solutions of this gum and its effects on other hydrocolloids [20,21,22,23]. Mirzaei et al. (2018) showed that using a mixture of KM and Xa gum in ketchup improves the physical stability and color of the sauce [24]. Gellan gum can also create a wide range of gel textures from hard and brittle gels to elastic, and as a multifunction gum with different functional properties, it is widely used in the food industry as a gelling, texturing, stabilizing, suspending, and structuring agent [24,25,26,27].
Various studies have been carried out on the synergistic interaction between some hydrocolloids in enhancing and improving the viscosity, texture, and functional properties of food [24,28,29]. However, there is a lack of knowledge on sliceable ketchup. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of gelling hydrocolloids on the physical, textural, and rheological properties of ketchup and to develop a new formulation for sliceable ketchup and its combined application as a filler in meat products such as sausages.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Viscosity

The viscosity of the ketchup is an essential factor in its acceptance by the consumer; therefore, it is also considered in the commercial production of ketchup [30,31]. Due to the unique nature of sliceable ketchup and its application in different sausages, this parameter was measured in the cooking temperature range and consumption of meat products (80–70 °C). According to Table 1, the addition of each of the gums (Xa, KM, gellan, and LBG) separately or in combination with Xa gum had a significant effect on the viscosity of the samples produced.
As can be seen from Figure 1, during the combined application of hydrocolloids, the viscosity of ketchup samples decreased with increasing gellan content, while the viscosity of the produced samples increased with increasing amounts of Xa gum in combination with other hydrocolloids.
The lowest viscosity of the sample (12.5% Km, 12.5% LBG, 62.5% G, and 12.5% Xa) is K5, which could be due to the pseudoplastic behavior of the gel in the temperature range of 25 to 55 °C, and the Newtonian behavior of its solutions is in the temperature range of 70–60 °C. The gradual change in the behavior of the gellan solution from pseudoplastic to Newtonian, which is called gellan melting, is influenced by the re-formation of its structure as random macromolecular chains [32]. However, the presence of Xa in higher amounts increased the sauce’s viscosity, so that in the treatment, K13 (12.5% Km, 12.5% LBG, 12.5% G, and 62.5% Xa) shows the highest apparent viscosity among the samples. This increase occurred due to the synergistic effect between Xa gum, LBG, and KM.
Although it has been well established that the apparent viscosity of ketchup depends on the soluble pectin and pulp content relative to the total solids content [33,34], the effect of the concentration of hydrocolloids, especially Xa gum, on the viscosity is remarkable. In fact, trisaccharide units that are regularly located on the cellulose chain are responsible for the specific rheological behavior of this gum. Studies show that LBG exhibits high-viscosity non-Newtonian behavior alone [35,36]. However, in combination with Xa, due to intramolecular interactions between the Xa side chains and the main galactomannan chain, which follows the lock and key model, increase the viscosity of the sauce, which depends on the ratio of gums used in the formulation [35]. The interaction between LBG and Xa occurs due to the hydrogen bond between the LBG hemiacetal oxygen atom as the electron donor and the No. 2 carboxyl carbon group of the Xa side internal chain as the electron receptor [5]. An electrostatic bond also occurs between the K+ cation attached to the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group in the Xa glucoronosyl chain with the hemiacetal oxygen atom of the main LBG chain. The combination of Xa with KM and LBG also produces heat-reversible gels; a mixture of Xa and KM forms a stronger gel than the combination of Xa and LBG in equal percentages [35]. The glucose-free regions of the Km chain communicate with the smooth area of the Xa helixes, which in turn leads to an increase in viscosity.
Mao et al. (2012) described the synergistic effect between KM and Xa as the result of successive linkages between Km glucose sequences with chains of six units or more of Xa [37]. They believe that the bond between Xa–Km depends on the sequence of glucose units in the chemical structure of both gums as well as the high ratio of the enthalpy to the entropy of their reaction. As a result of intramolecular reactions between KM and Xa, dehydration occurs and water molecules are released, which causes a large change in their hydration entropy [35]. In addition, interactions between thickening molecules have been reported to increase viscosity [31]. In high-viscosity systems, the molecules involved in the gel lattice are more closely intertwined and the dispersed phase motility is low. Therefore, in the gel networks formed in the presence of KM, LBG, and Xa, especially in the K13 sample, the movement of the continuous aqueous phase is restricted in the ketchup suspension.

2.2. Physical Stability

The separation of ketchup serum (syneresis) is one of the biggest problems in the ketchup industry. Its control during storage is very important because it has a negative impact on product quality and acceptance by the customer [35]. Since this particular type of sauce will be used in meat products, high physical stability and low syneresis are very important. The results relating to the physical stability of different samples are shown in Table 2. As can be seen, the lowest amount of syneresis or the highest physical stability relates to the samples K6 (50% gellan, 50% Xa), K14 (100% Xa), K16 (50% Xa, 50% KM), and K7 (50% Xa and 50% LBG).
In general, samples with higher viscosity also had better physical stability. The greatest effect on reducing syneresis was observed in the combined use of Xa gum and gellan. The mere use of KM and LBG alone has increased syneresis; however, when used in combination with Xa gum, they prevented syneresis of the samples. According to Figure 2, it can be seen that in higher amounts of Xa, the percentage of syneresis decreases and reaches below 1%, while increasing the amount of KM and gellan increases the rate of syneresis.
The high water-binding capacity of Xa gum (232 mL/g) [38] makes it very stable against syneresis even during storage because Xa gum is a heteropolysaccharide that has repeating pentasaccharide units. This pentasaccharide contains two units of mannose, two units of glucose, and one unit of glucuronic acid; therefore, these factors cause the stability and firmness of Xa gum against acid and heat. Another reason is the synergistic effect between Xa and gellan [39]. When Xa and gellan are used, the amount of syneresis is reduced to an acceptable level. This positive effect is enhanced when a 1:1 ratio of these two gums is used in the formulation [40]. For this reason, in the confectionery industry, the combination of gellan with Xa and LBG is used to improve and maintain moisture and reduce the syneresis of a variety of jelly desserts and puddings [16].

2.3. Color Properties

The L* index indicates the product’s lightness and is in the range of zero (completely dark) to 100 (completely light). The parameters a and b are in the range of −60 to +60. Positive values of the a parameter indicate redness, and negative values indicate the amount of green. Further, the b parameter indicates the amount of yellowness and blue in the sample. The results of the colorimetric test of the samples are shown in Table 3.
According to Figure 3, the effect of applied hydrocolloids on the color parameters L, a, and b is observed. Since the total concentration of gums used in all samples is equal (in total: 1.5%), their different concentrations have no significant effect on the parameters L and a and are effective only on the b parameter. The concentration of Xa and gellan in the formulation of this index has also increased. The highest value of the a is for sample K8 (50% Xa, 50% G), and the highest L is for sample K14 (100% Xa).
The a/b ratio is often used as a qualitative parameter in tomato-based products [41]. This ratio indicates that the finer the particles, the more and easier it will be to detect their lycopene content. Therefore, in this case, the ratio a/b will be more than one [8,42]. The results obtained for the parameters a and a/b were consistent with the results of Poretta (1991) on 18 types of commercial ketchup [4].

2.4. Texture Analysis

The results relating to the textural characteristics of different ketchup samples can be seen in Table 1. The evaluation of various parameters of cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, chewiness, firmness, and adhesiveness showed that process variables only have a significant effect on texture firmness. Except for the samples containing Xa gum and LBG in other samples, the addition of each gum alone or in combination did not have a significant effect on the firmness. The K13 and K19 samples had the highest firmness
According to Figure 4, it can be seen that with higher amounts of Xa and LBG, the firmness of the ketchup sample increased, while on the other hand, by increasing the amount of gellan, the firmness decreased. This is also due to the synergistic effect between Xa gum and LBG because Xa gum does not form a gel on its own. The texture firmness results, for example, K14, which contains 100% Xa (Table 4), confirm this. However, the combination of these two gums with each other due to the synergistic effect and intermolecular interactions has led to increased firmness; the results of Tako (1992) confirm this [43].
According to the results of viscosity, physical stability, color, and texture analysis, two samples of ketchup with optimal formulas along with a sample of commercial ketchup as a control sample were selected for flow behavior tests, frequency sweep, particle size distribution analysis, and microstructure analysis.

2.5. Rheological Analysis

This test was performed on two selected samples and a sample of commercial ketchup as a control. The rheological properties of the samples were evaluated in two sections: flow behavior and viscoelastic properties. These tests were measured for the commercial sample of ketchup at 25 °C and the optimal samples at 55 °C. The temperature of 55 °C was also selected according to the sausage temperature upon consumption.

2.5.1. Flow Behavior

The apparent viscosity trend changes in the selected samples against frequency are shown in Figure 5a. The results show that the viscosity of all samples decreased by increasing the shear rate, which indicates the pseudoplastic and shear-thinning behavior. The commercial sample (K1) has a much lower viscosity than the other two samples (K21 and K23). Similar flow behavior has been reported in various studies for ketchup [3,5,44,45,46,47,48]. In fact, due to the synergistic interactions between Xa and LBG, the functional groups of the two gums participate in the water uptake process and form a gel network.
Due to the increase in shear rate and the alignment of the biopolymer chains of hydrocolloids in the gel network with the applied incision, the gel structure is degraded and consequently, the apparent viscosity decreases and the shear-thinning behavior appears [45].
For galactomannans and other polysaccharides with a random helix structure at very low and very high shear rates, Newtonian behaviors called zero and infinite viscosity have been observed [49]. Rheological models such as Cross and Carreau are used to evaluate this behavior. In this study, the data were fitted with different rheological models and the results of fitting showed that the Carreau model with the highest coefficient of explanation (R2) is a suitable model to describe the results of the flow behavior of the samples. Table 5 shows the various parameters of the Carreau model.
Samples K21 and K32 showed the highest infinite viscosity. A comparison of zero and infinite shear viscosities (η0 and η) shows that adding Xa and LBG in these ratios reduces the shear viscosity. This can be attributed to the interaction between the two gums, which is also consistent with published results [45,46]. The rest time (λ) was positive for all samples, indicating non-Newtonian behavior.
At low frequencies in all three samples, the phenomenon of zero shear viscosity was observed, which indicates the ability of the samples to be two-phase at low frequencies. In this case, the K21 sample (with a viscosity of 8890 Pa·s) is better because it has a higher viscosity than other samples, especially the commercial sample. This is due to the LBG and Xa in the two samples K21 and K32 because the synergistic effect between these two gums had reached its maximum value. This confirmed the interactions between the free LBG galactose groups and the Xa chain, which led to the formation of a strong gel network [50]. Additionally, at higher frequencies, there is a significant difference between the viscosity of the commercial sample and other samples. Due to the use of this type of sauce as a filling in sausages, this parameter is essential.
Since the value of n samples (Table 2) is in the range of 0.54–0.45 and all are less than one, it indicates the shear-thinning (pseudoplastic) behavior due to shear force for all samples. Sharoba et al. (2005) reported the flow behavior index of commercial ketchup samples from 0.399 to 0.275 [2].
Regarding the changes in the complex viscosity with the frequency, the viscosity in all three samples reaches a constant limit at very low frequencies, which indicates the Newtonian behavior of the samples in the static state. Then, by increasing the frequency and applying the stress, the viscosity decreases and shear-thinning behavior is observed in all samples. The high viscosity of the K21 sample is due to the increase in the concentration of Xa gum in the formulation and its positive effect on the viscosity (increased intermolecular interactions with LBG).

2.5.2. Viscoelastic Properties

The strain sweep test was performed at a frequency of 1 Hz and a strain rate of 0.01–100% to determine the linear viscoelastic region. The results of the frequency sweep (Figure 5b) at a frequency of 0.01–100 Hz below the viscoelastic region show that the changes in the storage modulus (G’) and the loss modulus (G’’) are a function of frequency. This behavior is related to the viscoelastic properties of weak gels, which are classified between real gels with covalent crosslinks and concentrated suspensions with a complex network [26]. According to the results presented by Patole et al. (2022), the measurement of viscoelastic parameters in the linear viscoelastic region leads to a reduction in structural changes during dynamic tests [51].
The higher storage modulus than the loss modulus (G’ > G”) indicates the predominance of solid viscoelastic properties in all samples; similar results for ketchup at 0.01–100 Hz [2] and 0.05–66 Hz [8] have also been reported. Changes in the storage modulus of the control sample in the frequency range of 0.01 to 100 Hz were different from other samples, which probably indicates less stability of the samples in the pumping state, while the other two samples behaved similarly to each other. In addition, the high storage modulus at high and low frequencies of the k21 and k32 samples compared to the control samples indicates a stronger structure in the stagnant (storage) state of these two samples. The results of Renou et al. (2013) on Xa gum, LBG, and their mixtures also confirm the result that if the mixed gums are used, the storage and loss modulus is 2 to 7 times higher than the modulus of each gum alone [16,19].
Changes in the loss tangent (tan δ = G’’/G’) also reflect the elastic properties of the material. At high frequencies, the K21 sample has the lowest amount of the loss tangent due to a sudden increase in the amount of storage modulus (larger slope). Similarly, Tipvarakarnkoon and Senge (2008) showed that Xa gum and LBG have a loss tangent of less than 1, which indicates the gelling phenomenon in the mixture of these gums [52]. Lorenzo et al. (2008) believe that due to the physical bonding between the polymer chains and the synergistic interactions between the hydrocolloids, a three-dimensional gel lattice forms and contributes to the development of lattice crosslinking [53]. The dual composition of specific polysaccharides exhibits unpredictable synergistic interactions. It has been well established that the synergistic process of gel formation occurs through direct bonding between two polymers and not through thermodynamic incompatibility [33]. When Xa and LBG are mixed, a network is formed whose strength depends on the preparation temperature and the weight ratio of the two gums [54]. The results indicate that the presence of acetyl groups on the Xa chain as well as the amount of galactomannan side chains play a vital role in gel formation, and increasing the number of galactose units prevents gel formation [50].
Based on the results, it was determined that no intersection between G’ and G’’ occurred at different frequencies; in other words, no crossover phenomenon was observed, which indicates physical stability at various stresses.
Using the linear regression obtained from the samples, the trend line equation of log G’ to log ω was obtained. The line slope of all three samples was in the range of 0.0197–0.218 Pa·Hz (Table 6). The lower slope indicates the dense and cohesive gel structure in the samples, which is reinforced at lower slope values (k21 and k32). Sharoba et al. (2005) reported the slope of eight commercial ketchup in the range of 0.1454–0.1032 Pa/Rad·s [2]. Further, the vertical intercept (y-intercept) of the studied samples was in the range of 2.3641–3.7563 Pa·s. The high values of this parameter indicate a greater sample consistency in the stagnant state, among which the k21 sample has the highest consistency.
The comparison of the complex viscosity (η*) of the samples in the linear viscoelastic range and the constant shear viscosity (η) of the flow behavior test shows that η* > η (Figure 5c) confirms the weak gel structure of the samples [22,55]. As shown in Figure 5c, at low frequencies, the amount of deformation is slower than forming new bonds, so the viscosity is constant. At high frequencies, due to the applied shear force, the weakly developed bonds are increasingly broken, which indicates the pseudoplastic flow behavior of the samples. It is also noted at high frequencies that no further structural destruction occurs, and constant viscosity and Newtonian behavior reappear. In addition, these highly regular gel networks, which hold molecules firmly in their structure, cause the gum solution to exhibit the viscoelastic properties of a weak gel [7].

2.6. Particle Size Distribution

Table 7 shows the results of the particle size distribution. Based on the results, it was determined that increasing the concentration of Xa gum from 32.094 to 75.06% increased the particle size and span number.
Figure 6 shows the particle size distribution of various ketchup samples. According to the results, it can be seen that in all three samples, monodispersity is evident in the particles. The results also showed that for samples K21 and K32, using a mixture of LBG and Xa gum in high percentages compared to the commercial sample led to the production of products with a larger size distribution. Accordingly, as shown in Figure 6, sample K21 has a larger distribution than sample K32. In fact, the larger contact surface area between finer droplets may cause higher frictional forces opposing the free flow of the suspension upon shearing, which would increase the final viscosity and stability results presented previously [24]. Indeed, in the samples containing KM, Xa, and LBG, along with gel formation, the established network gel causes the trapping of the aqueous phase restricting serum separation and, consequently, leading to greater physical stability.

2.7. Microscopic Structure

The results obtained from the SEM images confirmed other results in terms of the particle size distribution (Figure 7). As shown in Figure 7, the K21 sample has a more cohesive structure with stronger crosslinks, and the two K1 and K32 samples had a more irregular form with weaker crosslinks (Figure 7). This is due to the ratio of Xa to LBG in the K21 sample, which results in maximum crosslinking between the gums. The imaging results also confirm the results obtained from the viscoelastic properties and flow behaviors of the samples.

3. Conclusions

The examination of all the characteristics of ketchup samples containing Xa, gellan, LBG, and KM gums showed that the combined use of LBG and Xa gum creates ketchup with desirable properties in terms of texture, syneresis, and viscosity parameters for use in a variety of meat products as a filler. The use of these two gums in a 1:3 ratio (Xa:LBG) gives the best results in terms of physicochemical, textural, and rheological properties of the final sauce that can be used in the filler formulation of various meat products such as sausages.

4. Materials and Methods

Xanthan and gellan gum from Fisino (Hangzhou, China), konjac mannan from Everhealth (Guangzhou, China), and locust bean gum from Danisco (Copenhagen, Denmark) were obtained. All other ingredients used to prepare ketchup samples such as tomato paste (Brix = 36), vinegar, sugar, salt, and modified potato starch ADAMYL 2075 were supplied by KMC (Brande, Denmark), and spices were supplied by the R&D department of Behrouz Food Industries Co. (Tehran, Iran).

4.1. Sample Preparation

Ketchup samples were designed using mixture design (Design-Expert 11.0.0 software, Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to Table 8. Tomato paste, vinegar, and water were mixed with 35%, 6%, and 38.74% w/w ratios, respectively. Gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG (in total: 1.5% w/w) and other powdered ingredients (i.e., sugar: 15% w/w, salt: 2% w/w, modified potato starch: 1% w/w, and spices: 0.75% w/w) were added to the primary mixture. The mixing/homogenizing and pasteurization procedures were conducted through a vacuum mixer–homogenizer (VMH-Lab, Arkan Felez, Qazvin, Iran) for 6 min at 90 °C. Glass containers (200 mL) were filled with the ketchup samples (at 85 °C).

4.2. Viscosity

The viscosity of all samples was measured using a Brookfield rotary viscometer (DV3T Rheometer, Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA) with a disc spindle (Spindle-RV-06) at 100 RPM and 80 °C one week after sample preparation [5].

4.3. Physical Stability

The method proposed by Şahin and Özdemir (2007) was used with some modifications to perform the physical stability test [5]. A 10 g sample of each ketchup was weighed in 15 mL falcons and placed in a water bath to reach a temperature of 80 °C (sausage cooking temperature). Then, by centrifugation (Universal 320R, Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany), with a speed of 2756 g (4800 rpm), at a temperature of 40 °C for 15 min, the amount of syneresis was determined. Finally, by measuring the supernatant, the sample stability was calculated using Equation (1) [30]. This test was performed one week after sample preparation.
Physical stability = [(supernatant weight − total weight sample)/(total weight sample)] × 100

4.4. Colorimetric Analysis

The color parameters (L, a, b) of the samples were determined using Hunterbell (Color flex, Ruston, LA, USA) after one week [30].

4.5. Texture Analysis

The parameters of firmness, cohesiveness, gumminess, adhesiveness, springiness, and chewiness were used to measure the texture properties of ketchup using a texture analyzer (TA-XT2 Texture Analyzer, Exponent Lite, Brookfield, USA) with a load cell of 4500 g. The samples were placed in cylindrical containers with a diameter of 26 mm and a height of 50 mm, and a cylindrical-type probe was selected (TA3-1000; D = 1.5 inches), the penetration rate of the probe into the sample was 1 mm/s and its penetration depth was 30 mm [22].

4.6. Viscoelastic Properties

This test was performed on commercial ketchup samples and selected samples obtained from the texture analysis, color, physical stability, and viscosity results using Design-Expert software. According to this test, the evaluation of flow behavior (steady flow behavior) and oscillating tests, including strain sweep (amplitude sweep) and frequency sweep, were performed using a rheometer with two parallel plates with a diameter of 25 mm and a plate spacing of 1 mm. In the test, the flow behavior was obtained in 0.001 to 100 1/s, and to investigate the flow properties, the following mathematical model (Equation (2)) was used and its parameters were determined:
η η η 0 η = ( 1 + ( λ γ ) 2 )   n 1 2
where η is the apparent viscosity (Pa·s), η0 is the shear viscosity at zero shear rates (Pa·s), η∞ is the shear viscosity at the infinite shear rate (Pa·s), λ is the release time (s), n is the flow behavior index (-), and γ is the shear velocity (1/s).
To evaluate the viscoelastic properties, a frequency of 1 Hz and a strain rate of 0.01 to 100% were used in the strain sweep test to determine the linear viscoelastic region. In the frequency sweep test, which is performed below the linear viscoelastic region, the amount of strain below the linear viscoelastic region was determined using a frequency of 0.01 to 100 Hz [26]. From this test, the factors of storage modulus (G’), loss modulus (G″), and complex viscosity (η+) were extracted as a function of frequency.

4.7. Particle Size Distribution Test

The Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Instrument Ltd, Malvern, UK) equipped with a quartz cell and a laser beam with a wavelength of 634 nm at 25 °C, was used to measure particle size distribution (wet dispersion, feed rate: 50 cc/10 s, speed: 1800 mL air/min, pressure: 4 bar, mixing rate: 10 gr ketchup +30 gr reverse osmosis water, ultrasound: on). The mean surface–weight diameter (D3,2) (Equation (3)) and mean volume–weight diameter (D4,3) (Equation (4)) were obtained for selected samples and commercial ketchup samples [56].
D 3 , 2 = n i d i 3 / n i d i 2
D 4 , 3 = n i d i 4 / n i d i 3

4.8. Microstructure

In this test, a scanning electron microscope equipped with an ESEM platform (FEI ESEM QUANTA 200, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to study the microstructure of the samples with a device voltage of 20 kV, a pressure of 130 Pa, and a magnification of 500×.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

In this study, to investigate the relationship between the independent variables (Xa, KM, gellan, and LBG) and the response variables, the response surface methodology (RSM) was used. The data obtained from the design matrix tests were analyzed using Design-Expert version 11. For this purpose, from the appropriate equations, to show the relationship between each of the dependent variables in the regression model with independent variables, their mixed contour diagrams were drawn by the software. To fit the given models, the values of the R2 model coefficient were determined [57].
Additionally, the experiments were performed in a completely randomized design in triplicate. The results of experiments were analyzed to evaluate the significant differences between the data using one-way ANOVA using MINITAB 18 software, and to compare the mean of treatments from Tukey multiple pairwise tests, a 5% probability level (p < 0.05) was used.

Author Contributions

N.S.: data curation, investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft; M.A.: conceptualization, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing; S.-A.S.: conceptualization, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing; M.M.: supervision and writing—review and editing; M.B.M.: methodology; A.R.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable (The study does not involve any human or animal testing).

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Ayatollah Amoli Branch of the Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran, for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

References

  1. Martín-Martín, S.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Sanchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M. Young consumer’s preference response to ketchup products. Acta Hortic. 2015, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharoba, A.; Senge, B.; El-Mansy, H.; Bahlol, H.E.; Blochwitz, R. Chemical, sensory and rheological properties of some commercial German and Egyptian tomato ketchups. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 220, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koocheki, A.; Ghandi, A.; Razavi, S.M.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Vasiljevic, T. The rheological properties of ketchup as a function of different hydrocolloids and temperature. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Porretta, S. Analytical profiling of ketchup. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1991, 57, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Şahin, H.; Özdemir, F. Effect of some hydrocolloids on the serum separation of different formulated ketchups. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Razi, S.M.; Motamedzadegan, A.; Matia-Merino, L.; Shahidi, S.-A.; Rashidinejad, A. The effect of pH and high-pressure processing (HPP) on the rheological properties of egg white albumin and basil seed gum mixtures. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phillips, G.O.; Williams, P.A. Handbook of Hydrocolloids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mert, B. Using high pressure microfluidization to improve physical properties and lycopene content of ketchup type products. J. Food Eng. 2012, 109, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Panovska, Z.; Štern, P.; Vachova, A.; Lukešová, D.; Pokorný, J. Textural and flavour characteristics of commercial tomato ketchups. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alam, K.; Ahmed, M.; Akter, S.; Islam, N.; Eun, J.-B. Effect of carboxymethylcellulose and starch as thickening agents on the quality of tomato ketchup. Pak. J. Nutr. 2009, 8, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gujral, H.S.; Sharma, A.; Singh, N. Effect of hydrocolloids, storage temperature, and duration on the consistency of tomato ketchup. Int. J. Food Prop. 2002, 5, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mousavi, S.M.R.; Rafe, A.; Yeganehzad, S. Structure-rheology relationships of composite gels: Alginate and Basil seed gum/guar gum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mousavi, S.M.R.; Rafe, A.; Yeganehzad, S. Textural, mechanical, and microstructural properties of restructured pimiento alginate-guar gels. J. Texture Stud. 2019, 50, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alam, F.; Nawab, A.; Lutfi, Z.; Haider, S.Z. Effect of non-starch polysaccharides on the pasting, gel, and gelation properties of taro (colocasia esculenta) starch. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 2000063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soleimani-Rambod, A.; Zomorodi, S.; Naghizadeh Raeisi, S.; Khosrowshahi Asl, A.; Shahidi, S.-A. The effect of xanthan gum and flaxseed mucilage as edible coatings in cheddar cheese during ripening. Coatings 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Williams, P.; Day, D.; Langdon, M.; Phillips, G.; Nishinari, K. Synergistic interaction of xanthan gum with glucomannans and galactomannans. Food Hydrocoll. 1991, 4, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, X.; Li, A.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Li, P.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. Improved physical properties of konjac glucomannan gels by co-incubating composite konjac glucomannan/xanthan systems under alkaline conditions. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 106, 105870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, X.; Gong, T.; Li, D.; Li, A.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. Preparation of high viscoelastic emulsion gels based on the synergistic gelation mechanism of xanthan and konjac glucomannan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 226, 115278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Renou, F.; Petibon, O.; Malhiac, C.; Grisel, M. Effect of xanthan structure on its interaction with locust bean gum: Toward prediction of rheological properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 32, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, J.; Wang, K.; Liu, M.; He, Z. In vitro evaluations of konjac glucomannan and xanthan gum mixture as the sustained release material of matrix tablet. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 73, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Impaprasert, R.; Piyarat, S.; Sophontanakij, N.; Sakulnate, N.; Paengkanya, S.; Borompichaichartkul, C.; Srzednicki, G. Rehydration and textural properties of dried konjac noodles: Effect of alkaline and some gelling agents. Horticulturae 2016, 3, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Worrasinchai, S.; Suphantharika, M.; Pinjai, S.; Jamnong, P. β-Glucan prepared from spent brewer’s yeast as a fat replacer in mayonnaise. Food Hydrocoll. 2006, 20, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.; Gong, T.; Lu, Y.-H.; Li, A.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. Compatibility of sodium alginate and konjac glucomannan and their applications in fabricating low-fat mayonnaise-like emulsion gels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mirzaei, M.; Alimi, M.; Shokoohi, S.; Golchoobi, L. Synergistic interactions between konjac-mannan and xanthan/tragacanth gums in tomato ketchup: Physical, rheological, and textural properties. J. Texture Stud. 2018, 49, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Morris, E.R.; Cutler, A.; Ross-Murphy, S.; Rees, D.; Price, J. Concentration and shear rate dependence of viscosity in random coil polysaccharide solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 1981, 1, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stoforos, N.I.G.; Reid, D.A.S. Factors influencing serum separation of tomato ketchup. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, N.; Li, X.; Ye, J.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, M. Effect of gellan gum and xanthan gum synergistic interactions and plasticizers on physical properties of plant-based enteric polymer films. Polymers 2020, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ghasemi, A.; Khandan, M.S.K.; Ardakani, S.A.Y. The effect of persian gums and tragacanth on texture and sensory characteristics of non-gluten cakes. J. Nutr. Food Secur. 2017, 2, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, Z.F.; Xu, T.; Wang, C.Y.; Deng, N. Effect of combination of three texture-improving ingredients on textural properties of emulsified sausage-containing salted egg white. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1387–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saha, D.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: A critical review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bayod, E.; Willers, E.P.; Tornberg, E. Rheological and structural characterization of tomato paste and its influence on the quality of ketchup. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giavasis, I.; Harvey, L.M.; McNeil, B. Gellan gum. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2000, 20, 177–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rani, U.; Bains, G. Flow behaviour of tomato ketchups. J. Texture Stud. 1987, 18, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tanglertpaibul, T.; Rao, M. Intrinsic viscosity of tomato serum as affected by methods of determination and methods of processing concentrates. J. Food Sci. 1987, 52, 1642–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El Batal, H.; Hasib, A.; Ouatmane, A.; Jaouad, A.; Naïmi, M. Rheology and influence factor of Locust Bean Gum solution. Rev. Génie Ind. 2012, 8, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khademi, F.; Raeisi, S.N.; Younesi, M.; Motamedzadegan, A.; Rabiei, K.; Shojaei, M.; Rokni, H.; Falsafi, M. Effect of probiotic bacteria on physicochemical, microbiological, textural, sensory properties and fatty acid profile of sour cream. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 166, 113244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mao, C.-F.; Klinthong, W.; Zeng, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-H. On the interaction between konjac glucomannan and xanthan in mixed gels: An analysis based on the cascade model. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sandolo, C.; Bulone, D.; Mangione, M.R.; Margheritelli, S.; Di Meo, C.; Alhaique, F.; Matricardi, P.; Coviello, T. Synergistic interaction of Locust Bean Gum and Xanthan investigated by rheology and light scattering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yılmaz, M.T.; Karaman, S.; Cankurt, H.; Kayacier, A.; Sagdic, O. Steady and dynamic oscillatory shear rheological properties of ketchup–processed cheese mixtures: Effect of temperature and concentration. J. Food Eng. 2011, 103, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Varela, P.; Gambaro, A.; Giménez, A.; Duran, I.; Lema, P. Sensory and instrumental texture measures on ketchup made with different thickeners. J. Texture Stud. 2003, 34, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Darabi, R.; Karimi, F.; Karaman, C.; Shahidi, S.A.; Zare, N.; Baghayeri, M.; Fu, L.; Rostamnia, S.; Rouhi, J. State-of-art advances on removal, degradation and electrochemical monitoring of 4-aminophenol pollutants in real samples: A review. Environ. Res. 2023, 222, 115338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shahidi, S.-A. Effect of solvent type on ultrasound-assisted extraction of antioxidant compounds from Ficaria kochii: Optimization by response surface methodology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 163, 112981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tako, M. Synergistic interaction between xanthan and konjac glucomannan in aqueous media. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alvarez-Manceñido, F.; Landin, M.; Lacik, I.; Martínez-Pacheco, R. Konjac glucomannan and konjac glucomannan/xanthan gum mixtures as excipients for controlled drug delivery systems. Diffusion of small drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 349, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Copetti, G.; Grassi, M.; Lapasin, R.; Pricl, S. Synergistic gelation of xanthan gum with locust bean gum: A rheological investigation. Glycoconj. J. 1997, 14, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kurt, A.; Toker, O.S.; Tornuk, F. Effect of xanthan and locust bean gum synergistic interaction on characteristics of biodegradable edible film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Porretta, S.; Birzi, A.; Ghizzoni, C.; Vicini, E. Effects of ultra-high hydrostatic pressure treatments on the quality of tomato juice. Food Chem. 1995, 52, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, C.; Xu, M.; Lv, W.-P.; Qiu, P.; Gong, Y.-Y.; Li, D.-S. Study on rheological behavior of konjac glucomannan. Phys. Procedia 2012, 33, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Morris, E.R.; Nishinari, K.; Rinaudo, M. Gelation of gellan—A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 28, 373–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dea, I.C.M.; Clark, A.H.; McCleary, B.V. Effect of galactose-substitution-patterns on the interaction properties of galactomannas. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 147, 275–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Patole, S.; Cheng, L.; Yang, Z. Impact of incorporations of various polysaccharides on rheological and microstructural characteristics of heat-induced quinoa protein isolate gels. Food Biophys. 2022, 17, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tipvarakarnkoon, T.; Senge, B. Rheological behaviour of gum solutions and their interactions after mixing. Annu. Trans. Nord. Rheol. Soc. 2008, 16, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lorenzo, G.; Zaritzky, N.; Califano, A. Modeling rheological properties of low-in-fat o/w emulsions stabilized with xanthan/guar mixtures. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Higiro, J.; Herald, T.J.; Alavi, S. Rheological study of xanthan and locust bean gum interaction in dilute solution. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Golchoobi, L.; Alimi, M.; Shokoohi, S.; Yousefi, H. Interaction between nanofibrillated cellulose with guar gum and carboxy methyl cellulose in low-fat mayonnaise. J. Texture Stud. 2016, 47, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Juszczak, L.; Oczadły, Z.; Gałkowska, D. Effect of modified starches on rheological properties of ketchup. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Karimi, F.; Hamidian, Y.; Behrouzifar, F.; Mostafazadeh, R.; Ghorbani-HasanSaraei, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Mortazavi, S.-M.; Janbazi, M.; Asrami, P.N. An applicable method for extraction of whole seeds protein and its determination through Bradford’s method. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 164, 113053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of hydrocolloids on the viscosity of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Figure 1. The effect of hydrocolloids on the viscosity of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Gels 09 00222 g001
Figure 2. The effect of hydrocolloids on the syneresis of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Figure 2. The effect of hydrocolloids on the syneresis of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Gels 09 00222 g002
Figure 3. The effect of hydrocolloids on the color of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Figure 3. The effect of hydrocolloids on the color of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Gels 09 00222 g003
Figure 4. The effect of hydrocolloids on the hardness of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Figure 4. The effect of hydrocolloids on the hardness of ketchup samples (A: xanthan, B: gellan, C: LBG).
Gels 09 00222 g004
Figure 5. Rheological properties of ketchups (commercial and sliceable): (a) flow behavior, (b) complex viscosity, and (c) storage and loss moduli as a function of frequency. (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG, and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG, and 32.094% xanthan).
Figure 5. Rheological properties of ketchups (commercial and sliceable): (a) flow behavior, (b) complex viscosity, and (c) storage and loss moduli as a function of frequency. (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG, and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG, and 32.094% xanthan).
Gels 09 00222 g005
Figure 6. Particle size distribution of ketchups (commercial and sliceable) (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan).
Figure 6. Particle size distribution of ketchups (commercial and sliceable) (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan).
Gels 09 00222 g006
Figure 7. Illustration of ketchups (commercial and sliceable) by ESEM. (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan).
Figure 7. Illustration of ketchups (commercial and sliceable) by ESEM. (K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan).
Gels 09 00222 g007
Table 1. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the viscosity of ketchup.
Table 1. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the viscosity of ketchup.
SamplesViscosity (mPa·s)
K15850 ± 14.1 f
K26150 ± 10.61 c
K35580 ± 1.41 h
K46090 ± 0.71 d
K53620 ± 7.78 q
K64220 ± 4.95 o
K74720 ± 3.54 l
K85750 ± 3.54 g
K94830 ± 2.12 k
K104360 ± 14.1 m
K114010 ± 0.71 p
K124850 ± 7.07 k
K136450 ± 2.83 a
K146270 ± 5.66 b
K154300 ± 0.71 n
K165330 ± 0.71 j
K175360 ± 9.19 ij
K185940 ± 14.1 e
K195390 ± 2.12 i
K204360 ± 12.02 m
Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 2. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the syneresis of ketchup.
Table 2. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the syneresis of ketchup.
SamplesSyneresis (%)
K13.59 ± 0.1131 i
K21.348 ± 0.0297 kl
K31.491 ± 0.0085 k
K41.445 ± 0.0226 k
K52.843 ± 0.0226 j
K60.699 ± 0.0297 p
K70.997 ± 0.0113 no
K822.022 ± 0.0170 b
K917.532 ± 0.0071 d
K1023.6 ± 0.0849 a
K1112.007 ± 0.0113 g
K124.139 ± 0.0184 h
K131.396 ± 0.0156 k
K140.6979 ± 0.0161 p
K151.144 ± 0.0127 mn
K160.8487 ± 0.0137 op
K1721.265 ± 0.0127 c
K1816.758 ± 0.0127 e
K191.197± 0.0156 m
K2012.35 ± 0.0566 f
Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 3. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the color properties of ketchup.
Table 3. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the color properties of ketchup.
SamplesL*a*b*
K125.38 ± 0.0283 efg31.2 ± 0.0778 bcde26.07 ± 0.0141 cde
K225.95 ± 0.240 bc29.52 ± 0.0495 h24.18 ± 0.0990 j
K324.52 ± 0.0495 j29.76 ± 0.1410 gh25.32 ± 0.1131 gh
K424.08 ± 0.0919 k29.26 ± 0.0849 hi23.15 ± 0.1560 l
K524.00 ± 0.0283 k29.44 ± 0.0707 h27.72 ± 0.0990 a
K625.18 ± 0.0141 fgh28.64 ± 0.1980 ij26.8 ± 0.1560 b
K723.94 ± 0.0212 k28.09 ± 0.1980 j25.99 ± 0.2120 cdef
K825.13 ± 0.0354 gh32.02 ± 0.1410 a26.43 ± 0.1560 bc
K925.6 ± 0.0283 de31.36 ± 0.1700 bcd25.59 ± 0.1700 defgh
K1025.84 ± 0.0424 cd31.66 ± 0.2970 ab26.03 ± 0.0283 cdef
K1125.12 ± 0.0000 gh31.44 ± 0.1840 abc25.75 ± 0.0566 defg
K1225.44 ± 0.0283 ef31.4 ± 0.0424 abcd25.51 ± 0.0566 efgh
K1325.03 ± 0.0283 hi30.83 ± 0.0990 cdef24.5 ± 0.0566 ij
K1427.57 ± 0.0778 a31.56 ± 0.2400 ab26.13 ± 0.1273 cd
K1524.61 ± 0.0849 j30.77 ± 0.3680 def25.46 ± 0.0849 fgh
K1626.2 ± 0.0919 b30.51 ± 0.1131 f23.5 ± 0.0141 kl
K1724.81 ± 0.0247 ij30.19 ± 0.0141 fg24.19 ± 0.0990 j
K1825.12 ± 0.0424 gh30.7 ± 0.0283 ef24.06 ± 0.0849 jk
K1925.37 ± 0.0566 efg30.84 ± 0.1131 cdef25.07 ± 0.1980 hi
K2024.72 ± 0.0424 j31.7 ± 0.0849 ab25.29 ± 0.3680 gh
Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values in each column with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 4. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the texture properties of ketchup.
Table 4. The effect of independent variables (gellan, Xa, KM, and LBG) on the texture properties of ketchup.
SamplesHardness
(N)
Adhesiveness
(mJ)
Cohesiveness
(--)
Springiness
(mm)
Gumminess
(N)
Chewiness
(mJ)
K14.685 ± 0.0156 de5.79 ± 0.2120 a0.6 ± 0.0707 abcd3.43 ± 0.0283 a2.77 ± 0.1700 d9.695 ± 0.0622 d
K26.139 ± 0.0198 c2.48 ± 0.1131 ij0.565 ± 0.0198 abcd3.1 ± 0.2120 abc2.68 ± 0.0849 d7.86 ± 0.1700 e
K38.89 ± 0.1840 a2.535 ± 0.0156 i0.535 ± 0.0184 bcd3.19 ± 0.1840 ab4.656 ± 0.1500 a14.92 ± 0.0424 a
K43.786 ± 0.0255 e2.735 ± 0.1510 hi0.49 ± 0.0707 cd2.78 ± 0.1560 abcd1.809 ± 0.0198 e5.035 ± 0.1061 g
K52.118 ± 0.0127 f3.02 ± 0.1273 gh0.655 ± 0.0297 abc3.105 ± 0.0071 abc1.382 ± 0.0085 f4.315 ± 0.1358 h
K61.316 ± 0.0113 f2.1 ± 0.0424 j0.655 ± 0.0099 abc2.83 ± 0.0990 abcd0.864 ± 0.0042 g2.44 ± 0.0424 ij
K76.274 ± 0.0042 c3.3 ± 0.1700 fg0.54 ± 0.0566 abcd3.05 ± 0.0566 abc3.358 ± 0.0156 c10.26 ± 0.0566 c
K81.267 ± 0.0184 f3.355 ± 0.0170 efg0.66 ± 0.0707 abc2.66 ± 0.0283 bcd0.846 ± 0.0071 g2.34 ± 0.0990 ijk
K91.086 ± 0.0354 f3.75 ± 0.1273 de0.725 ± 0.0085 ab2.77 ± 0.0990 abcd0.7925 ± 0.0049 g2.275 ± 0.0156 jk
K101.431 ± 0.0042 f3.425 ± 0.0170 efg0.555 ± 0.0297 abcd2.365 ± 0.0099 cde0.796 ± 0.0028 g2.05 ± 0.0566 k
K111.184 ± 0.0113 f3.385 ± 0.0325 efg0.71 ± 0.0283 ab2.735 ± 0.5150 abcd0.839 ± 0.0028 g2.31 ± 0.0141 jk
K121.209 ± 0.0127 f3.67 ± 0.1131 def0.74 ± 0.0849 a2.9 ± 0.0707 abcd0.899 ± 0.0170 g2.65 ± 0.0990 i
K137.644 ± 0.0453 ab3.37 ± 0.0283 efg0.555 ± 0.0325 abcd2.99 ± 0.0849 abcd4.174 ± 0.0099 b12.53 ± 0.0990 b
K141.608 ± 0.0141 f2.565 ± 0.0170 i0.57 ± 0.0990 abcd2.46 ± 0.0707 bcde0.922 ± 0.0071 g2.305 ± 0.01131 jk
K155.464 ± 1.4200 cd3.255 ± 0.0382 g0.48 ± 0.0566 cd2.82 ± 0.0566 abcd2.6075 ± 0.0530 d7.355 ± 0.01131 f
K161.87 ± 0.0849 cd4.205 ± 0.1216 bc0.415 ± 0.0297 d1.91 ± 0.0424 e0.787 ± 0.0311 g1.545 ± 0.0269 l
K171.25 ± 0.0566 f3.67 ± 0.0849 def0.555 ± 0.0085 abcd2.25 ± 0.3390 de0.694 ± 0.0170 gh1.59 ± 0.1700 l
K181.596 ± 0.0042 f4.03 ± 0.0566 cd0.535 ± 0.0071 bcd2.29 ± 0.3680 de0.864 ± 0.0156 g2.15 ± 0.0566 jk
K196.435 ± 0.0127 bc4.59 ± 0.1131 b0.44 ± 0.0424 d2.76 ± 0.1131 abcd2.828 ± 0.0424 d7.835 ± 0.0099 e
K201.275 ± 0.0085 f4.015 ± 0.0778 cd0.43 ± 0.0707 d1.76 ± 0.0283 e0.549 ± 0.0170 h1.025 ± 0.0141 m
Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values in each column with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Carreau model parameters for filling ketchup.
Table 5. Carreau model parameters for filling ketchup.
Samples η0 (Pa·s) η∞ (Pa·s) λ (s) n (-) R2 MSE RMSE MAPE
K151580.411152.080.450.990.16470.40580.0161
K21522132.454128.880.540.990.30250.55000.0020
K32366521.562108.680.510.990.12430.35260.0016
K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan.
Table 6. Slope and intercept parameters for filling ketchup.
Table 6. Slope and intercept parameters for filling ketchup.
SamplesSlope (Pa·Hz)Intercept (Pa·s)
K10.418 ± 0.0014 a2.3641 ± 0.0002 c
K210.197 ± 0.0021 c3.7563 ± 0.0002 a
K320.218 ± 0.0014 b3.4943 ± 0.0000 b
K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan. Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values in each column with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Particle size distribution parameters of filling ketchup.
Table 7. Particle size distribution parameters of filling ketchup.
SamplesXanthan
(%)
LBG
(%)
d [3,2]
(um)
Spand [4,3]
(um)
K1100089.539 ± 0.0099 c2.191 ± 0.0007 b264.258 ± 0.004 c
K2175.06124.939199.419 ± 0.0060 b2.214 ± 0.0049 a474.560 ± 0.006 a
K3232.09467.906215.095 ± 0.0010 a2.124 ± 0.0042 c448.923 ± 0.016 b
K1 = 100% xanthan and 0% LBG, K21 = 24.939% LBG and 75.061% xanthan, K32 = 67.906% LBG and 32.094% xanthan. Data were displayed in means ± standard deviation. Values in each column with different letters were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 8. Experimental matrix based on the independent variables of the mixture design formula in (%).
Table 8. Experimental matrix based on the independent variables of the mixture design formula in (%).
TreatmentsKonjac Mannan (%)Locust Bean (%)Gellan (%)Xanthan (%)
K10 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)
K250 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)
K312.5 (Level 2)62.5 (Level 5)12.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)
K462.5 (Level 5)12.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)
K512.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)62.5 (Level 5)12.5 (Level 2)
K60 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)50 (Level 4)
K70 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)
K850 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)
K950 (Level 4)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)
K1050 (Level 4)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)
K110 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)
K120 (Level 1)100 (Level 6)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)
K1312.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)12.5 (Level 2)62.5 (Level 5)
K140 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)100 (Level 6)
K1525 (Level 3)25 (Level 3)25 (Level 3)25 (Level 3)
K1650 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)
K1750 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)
K18100 (Level 6)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)
K190 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)0 (Level 1)50 (Level 4)
K200 (Level 1)0 (Level 1)100 (Level 6)0 (Level 1)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shokraneh, N.; Alimi, M.; Shahidi, S.-A.; Mizani, M.; Bameni Moghadam, M.; Rafe, A. Textural and Rheological Properties of Sliceable Ketchup. Gels 2023, 9, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9030222

AMA Style

Shokraneh N, Alimi M, Shahidi S-A, Mizani M, Bameni Moghadam M, Rafe A. Textural and Rheological Properties of Sliceable Ketchup. Gels. 2023; 9(3):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9030222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shokraneh, Nadia, Mazdak Alimi, Seyed-Ahmad Shahidi, Maryam Mizani, M. Bameni Moghadam, and Ali Rafe. 2023. "Textural and Rheological Properties of Sliceable Ketchup" Gels 9, no. 3: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9030222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop