Next Article in Journal
Antibacterial and Angiogenic Poly(ionic liquid) Hydrogels
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Textile Waste Fibers Aerogels with Excellent Oil/Organic Solvent Adsorption and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Chitosan Composite Films Strengthened with Titanium Dioxide and Polyphosphonate Additives for Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatially-Resolved Network Dynamics of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Gels Measured with Dynamic Small Angle Light Scattering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/gels8080475
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Enhancing Mechanical Performance of a Polymer Material by Incorporating Pillar[5]arene-Based Host–Guest Interactions

by
Chengdi Huang
,
Hanwei Zhang
,
Ziqing Hu
,
Youping Zhang
and
Xiaofan Ji
*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2022, 8(8), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080475
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamics of Gels and Its Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polymer gels have been widely used in the field for tissue engineering, sensing, and drug delivery due to their excellent biocompatibility, hydrophilicity, and degradability. However, common polymer gels are easily deformed on account of their relatively weak mechanical properties, thereby hindering their application fields, as well as shortening their service life. The incorporation of reversible non-covalent bonds is capable of improving the mechanical properties of polymer gels. Thus, here, a poly(methyl methacrylate) polymer network was prepared by introducing host–guest interactions between pillar[5]arene and pyridine cation. Owing to the incorporated host–guest interactions, the modified polymer gels exhibited extraordinary mechanical properties according to the results of the tensile tests. In addition, the influence of the host–guest interaction on the mechanical properties of the gels was also proved by rheological experiments and swelling experiments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polymer gels, as an important material, have been widely applied in tissue engineering [1,2,3,4,5], sensing [6,7], and drug delivery [8,9], etc. However, in most cases, polymer gels are not endowed with enough mechanical strength, limiting their applications. The incorporation of physical crosslinkers in covalent polymer gels to construct a dual-crosslinked network is a desirable technique to enhance the mechanical properties of polymer gels [10]. Physical crosslinkers are based on reversible non-covalent bonds, which can dissipate vast quantities of energy through bond dissociation [11]. Due to this effective energy dissipation mechanism, polymer gels with physical crosslinkers can always bear a higher mechanical load, leading to outstanding toughness [12]. Apart from toughness, dual-crosslinked polymer gels are also capable of recovering their mechanical properties following relaxation, which is attributed to the cooperation of covalent crosslinking and the reversibility of non-covalent bonds [13,14,15]. Thus, incorporating physical crosslinkers in polymer gels is a promising strategy by which to improve the mechanical properties of polymer gels and has achieved much progress in numerous investigations [16].
To date, the most common physical crosslinkers include metal coordination [16,17], hydrogen bonds [18,19,20], and host–guest interactions [13,21,22,23,24]. Zhou et al. utilized Fe3+–acrylic acid coordination as the crosslink point to design a dual-crosslinked hydrogel network that exhibits outstanding toughness and mechanical performance [25]. Craig et al. developed a polymer gel network by incorporating bifunctional van Koten-type PINs as the reversible non-covalent bond [26]. This gel is endowed with excellent fracture stress, and a surprisingly short relaxation time was observed. Guan and co-workers surveyed the influence of hydrogen bonds on the mechanical properties of gels via incorporating secondary amide side chains in the gel network [15]. The results indicate a toughness over seven-fold stronger due to the dissociation of hydrogen bonds. A xerogel based on the host–guest interaction between β-cyclodextrin and adamantane was also reported [27]. This xerogel shows extraordinary tensile strength and great self-adhesive ability. Scherman and coworkers [14] constructed a dual-crosslinked network based on cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8])-mediated host–guest interactions, which endowed the polymer gels with excellent toughness, strength, elasticity, and recoverability. These studies evidence the significance of the introduction of physical crosslinkers that reinforce the mechanical performance of polymeric gels in many aspects [28,29]. Pillar[n]arenes [30,31,32,33], first introduced in 2008 [21], have been widely reported as important macrocyclic hosts due to their specific guest recognition [34,35,36,37,38,39,40], easily modifiable properties [33,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], and their rigid and symmetrical structure [33,47,48,49,50,51,52]. While the host–guest interactions based on pillar[n]arenes have been used for crosslinking linear polymers to obtain supramolecular polymer networks [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60], few studies have focused on the influence of their host–guest interactions on the mechanical performance of covalent polymer gels. Thus, it is essential to develop a novel polymer gel incorporating host–guest interactions based on pillar[n]arenes [61,62,63].
Herein, we report a modified G-HG polymer gel via incorporation of pillar[5]arenes (P5) and pyridine cation (PC) side chains into a covalently crosslinked poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) polymer network (Figure 1). The introduction of host–guest interactions will highly enhance the mechanical properties of the polymer gels. Upon mechanical loads, the host–guest complex can dissociate to dissipate vast quantities of energy, thereby dramatically enhancing the mechanical properties of the polymer gel. When the mechanical loads are withdrawn, the host–guest interactions will recover, thereby making the mechanical properties of the polymer gels reversible. To further prove the function of the host–guest interaction, we also designed two control polymer gels, including PMMA bearing solely P5 (G-H) and PMMA bearing solely PC (G-G) (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 2, the model polymer gel (G-HG) was prepared via free radical copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA), P5-modified MMA monomer, PC-modified MMA monomer, and covalent crosslinker poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA). Due to the molecular recognition between P5 and PC, the G-HG network bears the host–guest interactions. As for the two control polymer gels, G-H and G-G were prepared via the copolymerization of MMA, modified MMA monomer (P5 or PC-modified MMA), and PEGDA. All the polymer gels were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) under a nitrogen atmosphere, during which PEGDA was used as the covalent crosslinker. Characterized by attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR), the peak around 1723 cm−1 proved the presence of MMA units in the G-G, G-H, and G-HG polymer gels [64] (Figure S15). Additionally, the network structures of three polymer gels were evidenced by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Figure S16), shown in Figure S16, consistent with the formation of crosslinked structures. The detailed synthesis (Scheme S1) and characterization of the monomers and polymer gels are shown below.

2.1. The Tensile Tests of the Gels

The tensile tests were performed to evaluate the effect of the host–guest interactions on the mechanical properties in our system (Figure 3a–c, Movies S1–S3). A dramatic increase in final fracture strain was observed after the incorporation of the P5-based host–guest interactions (Figure 3d). G-HG exhibited an almost eight-fold final fracture strain, achieving a value near 118.6% (Figure 3e), while the highest value of G-H and G-G was only 15%. Compared to the other two control gels, G-HG achieved a fracture stress of 0.83 MPa (Figure 3f). Apart from the final fracture strain, the G-HG polymer gel also displayed an excellent toughness of 0.83 MJ/m3; in contrast, the values of G-H and G-G merely reached 0.25 MJ/m3 and 0.38 MJ/m3, respectively, exhibiting much lower toughness (Figure 3g). These increases observed in G-HG can be attributed to the effective energy dissipation mechanism due to the host–guest interactions between P5 and PC. The results reflected the remarkable influence of the incorporation of host–guest interactions on the gels’ mechanical performance.

2.2. The Rheological Experiment of the Gels

To further determine the effect of the P5-based host–guest interactions in G-HG on the dynamic mechanical performance, we studied the rheological properties of the model polymer gels and the control polymer gels by determining their storage and loss moduli at different frequencies and temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, with the increase in temperature, the rheological experiment of gels G-G (Figure 4a) and G-H (Figure 4b) remained relatively constant at the same frequency. When the temperature rose from 293 K to 323 K, in contrast to both G-G and G-H, the storage and loss moduli of G-HG changed in a large range, showing a relatively higher temperature dependence. This can be ascribed to the reformation of the host–guest interactions in G-HG being temperature dependent [14]. Thus, given the host–guest interactions in the G-HG network, the G-HG polymer gel reflected a relatively higher sensitivity to temperature upon dynamic mechanical loading and unloading. Additionally, the loss moduli of G-HG of different temperatures showed similar values at low frequencies, while a noticeable difference was observed in its loss moduli at high frequencies (Figure 4c). Presumably, at low frequencies, the rate of the reformation of the host–guest interactions in our system was high enough to dissipate the energy efficiently, thereby reducing the interference of temperature in the loss moduli of G-HG. However, with the increase in frequency, in the case of a stronger mechanical loading at high frequencies, the rate of reformation of the host–guest interactions decreased dramatically; the effect of temperature gradually showed its dominance, leading to the higher difference of the loss moduli at different temperatures. This phenomenon was also reported in some systems containing hydrogen bonds and different kinds of host–guest interactions [14,15].

2.3. The Swelling Experiment of the Gels

We next investigated changes in gel swelling behavior in the presence of a competing molecule, an imidazolium cation (guest 2). According to previous reports [54,65], imidazolium cation can form stronger interactions with pillar[5]arenes, thus disrupting existing host–guest complexes in the gels. As shown in Figure 5a–5c, two circular sheet samples of the G-H, G-G, and G-HG gels were immersed in CHCl3 or 25 mM CHCl3/guest 2 solution, respectively. The gels reached swelling equilibrium after 3 h. The mass swelling ratio of each gel was calculated by the following formula:
Qm = (ms − m)/m
where Qm is the mass swelling ratio (%) of the gel, and m and ms represent the mass of the gel before and after swelling. The Qm values of the two samples of each gel are shown in Table S1. Then, we compared the differences in the mass swelling ratios of the two samples of each gel, as shown in Figure 5d. The difference in the mass swelling ratios of the two samples of G-H, G-G, and G-HG gels were 4%, 3%, and 34%, respectively. It was clearly found that the difference in the swelling ratios of the two G-HG gel samples was much larger than that of the other gel samples. These obtained results can be ascribed to the destruction of the existing host–guest complex of the G-HG gel, followed by the involved non-covalent crosslinks vanishing, leading to the crosslink drop of the gel. The above reasons led the G-HG gel to swell more easily after soaking in CHCl3/guest 2 solution, causing a higher mass swelling ratio.

3. Conclusions

In summary, we report here a polymer gel modified by the incorporation of the host–guest interactions between the pillar[5]arenes and pyridine cation to construct a dual crosslinked polymer network. The incorporated host–guest interactions can be used as sacrificial non-covalent bonds that can dissociate upon mechanical loads to dissipate vast quantities of energy, thereby enhancing the mechanical properties dramatically. Relative to the control polymer gels without bearing the host–guest interactions, the model polymer gel exhibited an almost eight-fold increase in final fracture strain, achieving a value near 118.6%. The effect of host–guest interactions on the gels’ mechanical performance was further determined by measuring their rheological properties and by performing swelling experiments. The dual crosslinked polymer gels with extraordinary mechanical performance present a promising strategy, affording more choices of polymer gels for numerous applications, such as tissue engineering, biomedicine, and sensing, etc.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Instruments

Poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and BF3·Et2O were obtained from Macklin (Shanghai, China). 1,6-dibromohexane and paraformaldehyde were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). 4-Methoxyphenol was obtained from Leyan (Shanghai, China). Pyridine, azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), extra dry dimethyl formamide (DMF), extra dry dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), extra dry acetonitrile, and extra dry dichloromethane (DCM) were procured from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China). Potassium carbonate (K2CO3), potassium iodide (KI), methacrylic acid, and toluene were purchased from SINOPHARM (Shanghai, China). Chloroform was obtained from KeShi (Chengdu, China). Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was procured from Aike Reagent (Chengdu, China). All reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Solvents were either employed as purchased or purified by standard methods prior to use. Compound 3 was prepared according to the procedure described in the literature [54]. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were performed with a Bruker Advance 400 MHz spectrometer. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded using a Bruker microOTOF II. The rheological properties of the gels were measured using a rheometer MCR 302 (Anton Paar, Austria). The tensile tests of the gels were investigated using an electronic universal testing machine (CMT4104, Shenzhen San Testing Machine Co., Shenzhen, China) with a tensile rate of 7 mm/min. Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was recorded on a Bruker spectrometer (Vertex 70, Karlsruhe, Germany). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of freeze-dried gels were obtained using a Hitachi SU8010 instrument, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan.

4.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Compounds 3 and 4 and Guest 2

4.2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Compound 3

4-Methoxyphenol (12.4 g, 0.100 mol) and K2CO3 (22.0 g, 0.160 mol) were dispersed in acetonitrile (200 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Then, KI (0.200 g, 10.0 mmol) and excess 1,6-dibromohexane (18.5 mL, 0.120 mol) were added to the solution. The mixture was added to reflux condenser and reacted for 16 h. The solution was concentrated under vacuum and subjected to silica gel chromatography (petroleum ether (PE)/ethyl acetate (EA), 10:1, v/v) to give the product 1 (17.9 g, yield: 90%). 1H NMR (Figure S1) (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 6.83 (s, 4 H), 3.91 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.42 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 1.89 (t, J = 10.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.78 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.52 − 1.46 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (Figure S2) (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 153.84, 153.32, 115.54, 114.75, 77.16, 68.49, 55.85, 33.94, 32.82, 29.33, 28.06, 25.43.
Compound 1 (1.15 g, 4.00 mmol), 1,4-dimethoxybenzene (2.75 g, 20 mmol), paraformaldehyde (2.52 g, 84.0 mmol), and DCM (180 mL) were added into a flask under an ice-water bath and stirred for 30 min. Then, BF3·Et2O (3.60 mL) was added into the flask. After the color of solution changed from white to light yellow to olivine to dark green (ca. 40 min), water (300 mL) was poured into solution to quench the reaction. The pure compound 2 was obtained as white power (556 mg, yield: 15%) over silicone gel column chromatography (PE:DCM:EA = 90:30:1). 1H NMR (Figure S3) (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 7.02 − 6.78 (m, 10 H), 3.87 − 3.67 (m, 41 H), 1.30 − 1.25 (m, 4 H), 0.89 − 0.83 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (Figure S4) (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 151.21, 150.86, 150.42, 150.31, 149.64, 128.34, 128.21, 128.09, 128.05, 114.09, 113.40, 113.07, 69.00, 55.85, 55.39, 55.29, 33.16, 30.76, 29.72, 29.24, 29.03, 27.78, 24.08. HRMS (ESI+) (Figure S5) Calcd for C50H59BrO10 [M + Na]+: 923.3169, found: 923.3172.
Methacrylic acid (980 mg, 11.4 mmol) and potassium carbonate (157 mg, 1.14 mmol) were added in dry dimethyl formamide (20 mL) under stirring at room temperature for 0.5 h, then compound 2 (1.70 g, 1.90 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After the reaction was completed, the resulting mixture was evaporating of the solvent under reduced pressure and further purification was carried out by column chromatography using PE/EA as an eluent to afford 500 mg of product 3 as a white solid. Yield: 29%.1H NMR (Figure S6) (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 6.99 − 6.77 (m, 10 H), 6.12 (s, 1 H), 5.57 (s, 1 H), 4.16 (s, 2 H), 3.85 − 3.49(m, 39 H), 1.97 (s, 3 H), 1.81 − 1.44 (m, 8 H). 13C NMR (Figure S7) (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 167.62, 150.90, 150.21, 136.66, 128.46, 128.39, 128.33, 128.29, 125.36, 115.15, 114.28, 64.82, 55.90, 29.87, 29.82, 29.57, 29.20, 28.77, 26.18, 26.03, 22.95, 18.49. HRMS (ESI+) (Figure S8) Calcd for C54H64O12 [M + Na]+: 927.4296, found: 927.4263.

4.2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Compound 4

A solution of 6-bromohexyl acrylate (3.06 g, 13.0 mmol) and pyridine (5.14 g, 65 mmol) in toluene (45 mL) was refluxed at 80 °C for 24 h. The solution was then concentrated, dissolved in 3 mL ethanol, precipitated in 40 mL diethyl ether, and washed with petroleum ether to obtain a pale yellow oil 4 (1.60 g, 53%). 1H NMR (Figure S9) (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K) δ (ppm): 8.85 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 8.54 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.07 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.39 (d, J = 18.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.17 (dd, J = 17.3, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.95 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.62 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 4.16 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.03 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 1.68 (p, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.46 − 1.33 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (Figure S10) (100 MHz, D2O, 298 K) δ (ppm): 168.80, 145.59, 144.21, 132.22, 128.27, 127.76, 65.35, 61.85, 30.43, 27.51, 24.87, 24.62. HRMS (ESI+) (Figure S11) Calcd for C14H20NO2+ [M]+: 234.1489, found: 234.1496.

4.3. Synthesis and Characterization of Guest 2

The guest 2 was synthesized referring to the related literature [59]. 1-Butylimidazole (2.0 g, 16 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid were dissolved in chloroform (20 mL), which was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. After removing the solvents under reduced pressure, we obtained guest 2 as a colorless oil (3.82 g, 100%). 1H NMR (Figure S12) (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 8.79 (s, 1 H), 7.44 (s, 1 H), 7.18 (s, 1 H), 4.18 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.92 − 1.84 (m, 2 H), 1.43 − 1.33 (m, 2 H), 0.98 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (Figure S13) (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ (ppm): 135.15, 121.02, 120.99, 49.84, 32.25, 19.63, 13.43. HRMS (ESI+) (Figure S14) Calcd for C7H13N2+ [M]+: 125.1073, found: 125.1114.

4.4. Synthesis of G-HG, G-H, and G-G Gels

4.4.1. Synthesis of Gel G-HG

Gel G-HG was prepared from compounds 3 and 4, poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), and methyl methacrylate by free radical polymerization. A mixture of compound 3 (316.4 mg, 0.350 mmol), compound 4 (82.0 mg, 0.350 mmol), poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) (129 mg, 0.450 mmol), and methyl methacrylate (700 mg, 7.00 mmol) in 3.50 mL of DMSO was stirred at room temperature. A stream of nitrogen was bubbled through the reaction mixture for 30 min. AIBN (12.3 mg, 0.0750 mmol) was then added in one portion and the mixture was stirred for 10 min, sealed with a rubber septum and heated to 80 °C for 8 h, then gel G-HG was obtained.

4.4.2. Synthesis of Gel G-H

Gel G-H was prepared from compound 3, poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), and methyl methacrylate by free radical polymerization. A mixture of compound 3 (316.4 mg, 0.350 mmol), poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) (129 mg, 0.450 mmol), and methyl methacrylate (700 mg, 7.00 mmol) in 3.50 mL of DMSO was stirred at room temperature. A stream of nitrogen was bubbled through the reaction mixture for 30 min. AIBN (12.3 mg, 0.0750 mmol) was then added in one portion and the mixture was stirred for 10 min, sealed with a rubber septum, and heated to 80 °C for 8 h, then gel G-H was obtained.

4.4.3. Synthesis of Gel G-G

Gel G-G was prepared from compound 4, poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and methyl methacrylate by free radical polymerization. A mixture of compound 4 (82.0 mg, 0.350 mmol), poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) (129 mg, 0.450 mmol), and methyl methacrylate (700 mg, 7.00 mmol) in 3.50 mL of DMSO was stirred at room temperature. A stream of nitrogen was bubbled through the reaction mixture for 30 min. AIBN (12.3 mg, 0.0750 mmol) was then added in one portion and the mixture was stirred for 10 min, sealed with a rubber septum, and heated to 80 °C for 8 h, then gel G-G was obtained.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/gels8080475/s1, Scheme S1: Synthetic routes of compounds 3 and 4 and guest 2. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 298 K) of compound 1. Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 298 K) of compound 1. Figure S3: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 298 K) of compound 2. Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 298 K) of compound 2. Figure S5: HR-ESI+-MS spectrum of compound 2. Figure S6: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 298 K) of compound 3. Figure S7: 13C NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 298 K) of compound 3. Figure S8: HR-ESI+-MS spectrum of compound 3. Figure S9: 1H NMR spectrum (D2O, 400 MHz, 298 K) of compound 4. Figure S10: 13C NMR spectrum (D2O, 100 MHz, 298 K) of compound 4. Figure S11: HR-ESI+-MS spectrum of compound 4. Figure S12: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 298 K) of guest 2. Figure S13: 13C NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 298 K) of guest 2. Figure S14: HR-ESI+-MS spectra of guest 2. Figure S15: ATR-FTIR spectra of polymer gels (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG. Figure S16: SEM images of polymer gels (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG. Table S1: The Qm values of the two samples of each gel. Movie S1; Movie S2; Movie S3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H., H.Z. and X.J.; methodology, C.H.; formal analysis, C.H. and Y.Z.; data curation, C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H. and X.J.; supervision, X.J.; funding acquisition, X.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

X. Ji. acknowledges funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22001087). X. Ji. appreciates for support from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology, where he is being supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant 2020kfyXJJS013). X. Ji is also grateful for support from the Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2020MCF08), and The Open Research Fund (No. 2021JYBKF01) of Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Ministry of Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Rodrigues, J.; Tomas, H. Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: Gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2193–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saracino, G.A.; Cigognini, D.; Silva, D.; Caprini, A.; Gelain, F. Nanomaterials design and tests for neural tissue engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 225–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Imato, K.; Ohishi, T.; Nishihara, M.; Takahara, A.; Otsuka, H. Network Reorganization of Dynamic Covalent Polymer Gels with Exchangeable Diarylbibenzofuranone at Ambient Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11839–11845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ji, X.; Jie, K.; Zimmerman, S.C.; Huang, F. A double supramolecular crosslinked polymer gel exhibiting macroscale expansion and contraction behavior and multistimuli responsiveness. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1912–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, G.; Wu, J.; Wang, B.; Yan, S.; Zhang, K.; Ding, J.; Yin, J. Self-Healing Supramolecular Self-Assembled Hydrogels Based on Poly(l-glutamic acid). Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3508–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tran-Thi, T.-H.; Dagnelie, R.; Crunaire, S.; Nicole, L. Optical chemical sensors based on hybrid organic–inorganic sol–gel nanoreactors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 621–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jones, C.D.; Steed, J.W. Gels with sense: Supramolecular materials that respond to heat, light and sound. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 6546–6596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Raemdonck, K.; Braeckmans, K.; Demeester, J.; De Smedt, S.C. Merging the best of both worlds: Hybrid lipid-enveloped matrix nanocomposites in drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 444–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mayr, J.; Saldías, C.; Díaz, D. Release of small bioactive molecules from physical gels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1484–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fantner, G.E.; Hassenkam, T.; Kindt, J.H.; Weaver, J.C.; Birkedal, H.; Pechenik, L.; Cutroni, J.A.; Cidade, G.A.; Stucky, G.D.; Morse, D.E. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhao, X. Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: Building dissipation into stretchy networks. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 672–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Haque, M.A.; Kurokawa, T.; Gong, J.P. Super tough double network hydrogels and their application as biomaterials. Polymer 2012, 53, 1805–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodin, M.; Li, J.; Kuckling, D. Dually cross-linked single networks: Structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8147–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.; Tan, C.S.Y.; Yu, Z.; Lan, Y.; Abell, C.; Scherman, O.A. Biomimetic supramolecular polymer networks exhibiting both toughness and self-recovery. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Neal, J.A.; Mozhdehi, D.; Guan, Z. Enhancing mechanical performance of a covalent self-healing material by sacrificial noncovalent bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4846–4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, C.; Zhang, M.; Tang, D.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Song, B.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Yin, S.; et al. Fluorescent Metallacage-Core Supramolecular Polymer Gel Formed by Orthogonal Metal Coordination and Host–Guest Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7674–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Q.; Chen, F.; Shen, X.; He, T.; Qiu, H.; Yin, S.; Stang, P.J. Self-Healing Metallacycle-Cored Supramolecular Polymers Based on a Metal–Salen Complex Constructed by Orthogonal Metal Coordination and Host–Guest Interaction with Amino Acid Sensing. ACS Macro Lett. 2021, 10, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, H.-Q.; Sun, C.-L.; Niu, L.-Y.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Yang, Q.-Z. Supramolecular Polymeric Fluorescent Nanoparticles Based on Quadruple Hydrogen Bonds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 5483–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peng, H.-Q.; Xu, J.-F.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Yang, Q.-Z. Water-dispersible nanospheres of hydrogen-bonded supramolecular polymers and their application for mimicking light-harvesting systems. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1334–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sun, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, H.; Sessler, J.L.; Thordarson, P.; Lin, Y.-J.; Gong, H. AAAA–DDDD Quadruple H-Bond-Assisted Ionic Interactions: Robust Bis(guanidinium)/Dicarboxylate Heteroduplexes in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 20146–20154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogoshi, T.; Kanai, S.; Fujinami, S.; Yamagishi, T.-a.; Nakamoto, Y. para-Bridged Symmetrical Pillar[5]arenes: Their Lewis Acid Catalyzed Synthesis and Host–Guest Property. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5022–5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dong, S.; Zheng, B.; Yao, Y.; Han, C.; Yuan, J.; Antonietti, M.; Huang, F. LCST-Type Phase Behavior Induced by Pillar[5]arene/Ionic Liquid Host–Guest Complexation. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6864–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, J.; Qiu, H.; He, T.; Li, Y.; Yin, S. Fluorescent Supramolecular Polymers Formed by Crown Ether-Based Host-Guest Interaction. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, M.; Xu, D.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Dong, S.; Zheng, B.; Huang, F. Self-Healing Supramolecular Gels Formed by Crown Ether Based Host–Guest Interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7011–7015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, P.; Ma, S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, F. Molecularly Engineered Dual-Crosslinked Hydrogel with Ultrahigh Mechanical Strength, Toughness, and Good Self-Recovery. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kean, Z.S.; Hawk, J.L.; Lin, S.; Zhao, X.; Sijbesma, R.P.; Craig, S.L. Increasing the Maximum Achievable Strain of a Covalent Polymer Gel Through the Addition of Mechanically Invisible Cross-Links. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6013–6018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kakuta, T.; Takashima, Y.; Sano, T.; Nakamura, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Harada, A. Adhesion between semihard polymer materials containing cyclodextrin and adamantane based on host–guest interactions. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, Q.; Yan, K.; Chen, J.; Xia, M.; Li, M.; Liu, K.; Wang, D.; Wu, C.; Xie, Y. Recent advances in novel aerogels through the hybrid aggregation of inorganic nanomaterials and polymeric fibers for thermalinsulation. Aggregate 2021, 2, e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, L.; Ming, X.; Lin, C.; Duan, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Q. Unusual switching of ionic conductivity in ionogels enabled by water-induced phase separation. Aggregate 2022, 3, e249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, D.; Kou, Y.; Liang, J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, L.; Meier, H. A Facile and Efficient Preparation of Pillararenes and a Pillarquinone. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9721–9723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Xia, D.; Wang, P.; Ji, X.; Khashab, N.M.; Sessler, J.L.; Huang, F. Functional Supramolecular Polymeric Networks: The Marriage of Covalent Polymers and Macrocycle-Based Host-Guest Interactions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6070–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ogoshi, T.; Sueto, R.; Yoshikoshi, K.; Yasuhara, K.; Yamagishi, T. Spherical Vesicles Formed by Co-Assembly of Cyclic Pentagonal Pillar[5]quinone with Cyclic Hexagonal Pillar[6]arene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8064–8067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogoshi, T.; Yamagishi, T.-A.; Nakamoto, Y. Pillar-Shaped Macrocyclic Hosts Pillar[n]arenes: New Key Players for Supramolecular Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7937–8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xue, M.; Yang, Y.; Chi, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, F. Pillararenes, a New Class of Macrocycles for Supramolecular Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1294–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, E.; Huang, F. Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of Pillararenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2064–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kakuta, T.; Yamagishi, T.; Ogoshi, T. Stimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Assemblies Constructed from Pillar[n]arenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 1656–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cao, Y.; Hu, X.-Y.; Li, Y.; Zou, X.; Xiong, S.; Lin, C.; Shen, Y.-Z.; Wang, L. Multistimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Vesicles Based on Water-Soluble Pillar[6]arene and SAINT Complexation for Controllable Drug Release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10762–10769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, C. Pillararene-based supramolecular polymers: From molecular recognition to polymeric aggregates. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12420–12433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Y.; Ping, G.; Li, C. Efficient complexation between pillar[5]arenes and neutral guests: From host–guest chemistry to functional materials. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 9858–9872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ping, G.; Wang, Y.; Shen, L.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Chen, J.; Hu, B.; Cui, L.; Meng, Q.; Li, C. Highly efficient complexation of sanguinarine alkaloid by carboxylatopillar[6]arene: PKa shift, increased solubility and enhanced antibacterial activity. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 7381–7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Li, Y.-F.; Li, Z.; Lin, Q.; Yang, Y.-W. Functional supramolecular gels based on pillar[n]arene macrocycles. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 2180–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sathiyajith, C.; Shaikh, R.R.; Han, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Meguellati, K.; Yang, Y.-W. Biological and related applications of pillar[n]arenes. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 677–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Chen, D.-X.; Sun, Y.-L.; Zheng, Y.B.; Tan, L.-L.; Weiss, P.S.; Yang, Y.-W. Viologen-Mediated Assembly of and Sensing with Carboxylatopillar[5]arene-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1570–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dai, D.; Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.-R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Y.-W. Supramolecular Assembly-Induced Emission Enhancement for Efficient Mercury(II) Detection and Removal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4756–4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lou, X.-Y.; Yang, Y.-W. Pyridine-Conjugated Pillar[5]arene: From Molecular Crystals of Blue Luminescence to Red-Emissive Coordination Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 11976–11981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ni, M.; Zhang, N.; Xia, W.; Wu, X.; Yao, C.; Liu, X.; Hu, X.-Y.; Lin, C.; Wang, L. Dramatically Promoted Swelling of a Hydrogel by Pillar[6]arene–Ferrocene Complexation with Multistimuli Responsiveness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6643–6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y. Pillararene-based self-assembled amphiphiles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5491–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hu, X.-Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, D.; Xia, W.; Lin, C.; Pan, Y.; Wang, L. Pillar[5]arene-based supramolecular polypseudorotaxane polymer networks constructed by orthogonal self-assembly. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 4292–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, Y.; Jie, K.; Zhao, R.; Huang, F. Cis–Trans Selectivity of Haloalkene Isomers in Nonporous Adaptive Pillararene Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11847–11851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Q.; Zhu, H.; Huang, F. Alkyl Chain Length-Selective Vapor-Induced Fluorochromism of Pillar[5]arene-Based Nonporous Adaptive Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13290–13294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, E.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Q.; Huang, F. Separation of Monochlorotoluene Isomers by Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of Perethylated Pillar[5]arene and Pillar[6]arene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17102–17106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, J.; Yu, G.; Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Huang, F. Separation of Benzene and Cyclohexane by Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of a Hybrid[3]arene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2228–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xia, W.; Ni, M.; Yao, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, D.; Lin, C.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Responsive Gel-like Supramolecular Network Based on Pillar[6]arene–Ferrocenium Recognition Motifs in Polymeric Matrix. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 4403–4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Kang, L.; Li, H.; Xie, M.; Liao, X. Multiresponsive Supramolecular Gel Based on Pillararene-Containing Polymers. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 2814–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Boominathan, M.; Kiruthika, J.; Arunachalam, M. Construction of anion-responsive crosslinked polypseudorotaxane based on molecular recognition of pillar[5]arene. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 1508–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shao, L.; Sun, J.; Hua, B.; Huang, F. An AIEE fluorescent supramolecular cross-linked polymer network based on pillar[5]arene host–guest recognition: Construction and application in explosive detection. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4866–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kardelis, V.; Li, K.; Nierengarten, I.; Holler, M.; Nierengarten, J.-F.; Adronov, A. Supramolecular Organogels Prepared from Pillar[5]arene-Functionalized Conjugated Polymers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9144–9150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, R.; Wang, L.; He, X.; Jiang, H.; Tang, H.; Cao, D.; Tang, B.Z. A Conjugated Polymeric Supramolecular Network with Aggregation-Induced Emission Enhancement: An Efficient Light-Harvesting System with an Ultrahigh Antenna Effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 9908–9913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.-H.; Song, N.; Hou, W.; Wang, C.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y.-W. Supramolecular Polymer Systems: Efficient Aggregation-Induced Emission Manipulated by Polymer Host Materials. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1970261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chen, J.-F.; Chen, P. Pillar[5]arene-Based Resilient Supramolecular Gel with Dual-Stimuli Responses and Self-Healing Properties. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 2224–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Han, M.C.; He, H.W.; Kong, W.K.; Dong, K.; Wang, B.Y.; Yan, X.; Wang, L.M.; Ning, X. High-performance Electret and Antibacterial Polypropylene Meltblown Nonwoven Materials Doped with Boehmite and ZnO Nanoparticles for Air Filtration. Fiber. Polym. 2022, 23, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ning, F.; He, G.; Sheng, C.; He, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, R.; Ning, X. Yarn on yarn abrasion performance of high modulus polyethylene fiber improved by graphene/polyurethane composites coating. J. Eng. Fiber. Fabr. 2021, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Z.J.; Qiang, H.F. Mechanical properties of thermal aged HTPB composite solid propellant under confining pressure. Def. Technol. 2022, 18, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liang, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, B.; Han, X. Preparation and properties of anti-infrared transparent thermalinsulating film based on polymethyl methacrylate. Energy 2020, 194, 116848–116854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xia, B.; Zheng, B.; Han, C.; Dong, S.; Zhang, M.; Hu, B.; Yu, Y.; Huang, F. A novel pH-responsive supramolecular polymer constructed by pillar[5]arene-based host–guest interactions. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 2019–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gels 08 00475 g001 550
Figure 1. The energy dissipation mechanism of the polymer gel network bearing pillar[5]arene-based host–guest interactions and the chemical structures of G-HG, G-H, and G-G polymer gels.
Figure 1. The energy dissipation mechanism of the polymer gel network bearing pillar[5]arene-based host–guest interactions and the chemical structures of G-HG, G-H, and G-G polymer gels.
Gels 08 00475 g001
Gels 08 00475 g002 550
Figure 2. The synthetic routes used to obtain the G-HG, G-H, and G-G gels.
Figure 2. The synthetic routes used to obtain the G-HG, G-H, and G-G gels.
Gels 08 00475 g002
Gels 08 00475 g003 550
Figure 3. Photographs of the polymer gels of (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG during the tensile tests. (d) Stress–strain curves, (e) fracture strain, (f) fracture stress, and (g) toughness of the G-G, G-H, and G-HG polymer gels.
Figure 3. Photographs of the polymer gels of (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG during the tensile tests. (d) Stress–strain curves, (e) fracture strain, (f) fracture stress, and (g) toughness of the G-G, G-H, and G-HG polymer gels.
Gels 08 00475 g003
Gels 08 00475 g004 550
Figure 4. Storage (square) and loss (triangle) moduli versus frequency at different temperatures for the polymer gels (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG.
Figure 4. Storage (square) and loss (triangle) moduli versus frequency at different temperatures for the polymer gels (a) G-G, (b) G-H, and (c) G-HG.
Gels 08 00475 g004
Gels 08 00475 g005 550
Figure 5. Photographs of polymer gels of (a) G-H and G-H’, (b) G-G and G-G’, and (c) G-HG and G-HG’ before and after soaking in CHCl3 or 25 mM CHCl3/guest 2 solution, respectively. The circular sheet samples of gels immersed in CHCl3 were called G-H, G-G, and G-HG, whereas those soaked in 25 mM guest 2/CHCl3 solution were labeled G-H’, G-G’, and G-HG’, respectively. The square of figure is 1 cm × 1 cm. (d) The difference in the mass swelling ratio of the two samples of G-H, G-G, and G-HG gels.
Figure 5. Photographs of polymer gels of (a) G-H and G-H’, (b) G-G and G-G’, and (c) G-HG and G-HG’ before and after soaking in CHCl3 or 25 mM CHCl3/guest 2 solution, respectively. The circular sheet samples of gels immersed in CHCl3 were called G-H, G-G, and G-HG, whereas those soaked in 25 mM guest 2/CHCl3 solution were labeled G-H’, G-G’, and G-HG’, respectively. The square of figure is 1 cm × 1 cm. (d) The difference in the mass swelling ratio of the two samples of G-H, G-G, and G-HG gels.
Gels 08 00475 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, X. Enhancing Mechanical Performance of a Polymer Material by Incorporating Pillar[5]arene-Based Host–Guest Interactions. Gels 2022, 8, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080475

AMA Style

Huang C, Zhang H, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Ji X. Enhancing Mechanical Performance of a Polymer Material by Incorporating Pillar[5]arene-Based Host–Guest Interactions. Gels. 2022; 8(8):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Chengdi, Hanwei Zhang, Ziqing Hu, Youping Zhang, and Xiaofan Ji. 2022. "Enhancing Mechanical Performance of a Polymer Material by Incorporating Pillar[5]arene-Based Host–Guest Interactions" Gels 8, no. 8: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop