Next Article in Journal
The SUMOylation Pathway Components Are Required for Vegetative Growth, Asexual Development, Cytotoxic Responses, and Programmed Cell Death Events in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum
Next Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Corticioid Fungi in Auriculariaceae (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): A New Genus, Five New Species and Four New Combinations
Previous Article in Journal
URA3 as a Selectable Marker for Disruption and Functional Assessment of PacC Gene in the Entomopathogenic Fungus Isaria javanica
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Phylogeny of Lyophylloid Mushrooms in China with Description of Four New Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota)

1
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Kenli Branch of Dongying Natural Resources and Planning Bureau, Dongying 257500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010093
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny and Diversity of Forestry Fungi)

Abstract

:
Peniophora is an old corticioid genus, from which two small satellite genera, Dendrophora and Duportella, were derived based on morphological differences. Molecular systematic studies showed that they belong to Peniophoraceae, Russulales, but the inter- and intra-generic phylogenetic relationships are still unclear. Moreover, the species diversity of this group in subtropical and tropical Asia has not been sufficiently investigated and studied. In this study, we carried out an intensive taxonomic and phylogenetic study on Peniophora sensu lato based on analyses of concatenated ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS, Internal Transcribed Spacer) and 28S (D1–D2 domains of nuc 28S rDNA) sequence data of all available species worldwide. In the phylogenetic trees, species of Peniophora s. l. (sensu lato) including types of Peniophora s.s. (sensu stricto), Dendrophora and Duportella were interspersed within a strongly supported clade. It means that the morphological delimitations of the three genera are not reliable, and they should be regarded as a large genus. As a result, eight species of Duportella were transferred to Peniophora, although five of them have not been sequenced. Four new distinct lineages, corresponding to Peniophora cremicolor, P. major, P. shenghuae and P. vietnamensis spp. nov., were recovered in the trees. Peniophora taiwanensis is treated as a later synonym of P. malaiensis based on morphological and molecular evidence. Duportella renispora is excluded from Peniophoraceae, because BLAST results of the ITS and 28S sequences of the holotype showed that it is closely related to Amylostereum. Descriptions and illustrations are provided for the four new species, and an identification key is given for all 25 species of Peniophora in China. Our results indicated that the species diversity of the corticioid fungi in Asia is rich and deserves further study.

1. Introduction

The genus Peniophora Cooke (Peniophoraceae, Russulales) introduced in 1879, typified by Thelephora quercina Pers. ex Fr., is one of the oldest genera of corticioid fungi. It is a cosmopolitan genus with a wide distribution from boreal to tropical areas, causing a white rot on both angiosperms and gymnosperms. Species of the genus prefer to grow on small branches especially those dead but still attached ones in the exposed and dry environments. At the beginning, mycologists adopted a broad concept, and many unrelated species were described in the genus. It includes 639 names in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp, accessed on 20 November 2022), but most species have been moved to other genera, and the morphological circumscription of Peniophora has been narrowed [1]. Meanwhile, some intra-generic taxa were proposed and used, and two satellite genera Duportella Pat. and Dendrophora (Parmasto) Chamuris were separated from Peniophora s.l. and accepted by many mycologists [2,3,4,5]. In the morphological monograph of Peniophoraceae [5], Andreasen and Hallenberg accepted 70 species of Peniophora s.s., 12 species of Duportella and 2 species of Dendrophora and provided keys and descriptions for all the genera and species.
According to the modern concept, Peniophora s.s. includes species possessing resupinate basidiomes with a smooth hymenophore, a monomitic hyphal system with simple-septate or nodose-septate generative hyphae, both encrusted cystidia and gloeocystidia, and thin-walled, smooth basidiospores negative in Melzer’s reagents. Dendrophora differs from Peniophora s.s. by having effused-reflexed basidiomes and the presence of brown, thick-walled dendrohyphidia, while Duportella differs by the presence of brown lamprocystidia and skeletal hyphae (in some species). However, there are usually morphological overlaps among the three genera. Based on the analyses of ITS sequences of Aphyllophorales, Boidin et al. [4] found that species of Peniophora s.l. formed a relatively strongly supported group that they named ‘Peniophorales’. Later, phylogenetic studies showed that Peniophora s.l. belongs to Peniophoraceae, Russulales [6,7,8]. Nevertheless, no comprehensive molecular studies have been carried out for Peniophora s.l., and the inter- and intra-generic phylogeny is not clear.
The ITS and 28S sequences of many species of Peniophora s.l. including some from type specimens were released in GenBank by Vu et al. [9] and thus made it possible to study the phylogeny of this group. In this paper, we studied the taxonomy and phylogeny of Peniophora s.l. by adding many sequence data of species from Asia, which was shown to be rich in the species diversity of this group [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. We aim to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella, and explore the species diversity in China. This research is a part of the studies of species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of corticioid fungi in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Voucher specimens and strains are deposited at the herbaria of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China (BJFC) and Centre for Forest Mycology Research, U.S. Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (CFMR). Freehand sections were made from dried basidiomes and mounted in 2% (w/v) potassium hydroxide (KOH) with 1% (w/v) phloxine, Melzer’s reagent (IKI) or cotton blue (CB). Microscopic examinations were carried out with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications up to 1000×. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube. The following abbreviations are used: L = mean spore length, W = mean spore width, Q = L/W ratio, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from number of specimens (b). Color codes and terms follow Kornerup and Wanscher [17].

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

A CTAB plant genomic DNA extraction Kit DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to extract total genomic DNA from dried specimens which were then amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was amplified with the primer pair ITS5/ITS4 [18] using the following protocol: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The 28S D1-D2 region was amplified with the primer pair LR0R/LR7 [19] employing the following procedure: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. DNA sequencing was performed at Beijing Genomics Institute, and the newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). BioEdit v.7.0.5.3 [20] was used to review the chromatograms and for contig assembly.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The molecular phylogenetic analyses were inferred from two separate concatenated ITS-28S sequences datasets of species in the Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l., respectively. Amylostereum chailletii (Pers.) Boidin was elected as the outgroup for the Peniophoraceae dataset, whilst Confertobasidium olivaceoalbum (Bourdot & Galzin) Jülich and Metulodontia nivea (P. Karst.) Parmasto were used for the Peniophora s.l. dataset. The ITS and 28S sequences were aligned separately using MAFFT v.7 [21] with the G-INS-I iterative refinement algorithm and optimized manually in BioEdit v.7.0.5.3. The separate alignments were then concatenated using Mesquite v.3.5.1 [22].
Maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) analyses and Bayesian inference (BI) were carried out by using PAUP* v.4.0b10 [23], RAxML v.8.2.10 [24] and MrBayes 3.2.6 [25], respectively. In MP analysis, trees were generated using 100 replicates of the random stepwise addition of sequence and tree-bisection reconnection (TBR) branch-swapping algorithm with all characters given equal weight. Branch supports for all parsimony analyses were estimated by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates with a heuristic search of 10 random-addition replicates for each bootstrap replicate. In ML analysis, statistical support values were obtained using rapid bootstrapping with 1000 replicates, with default settings used for other parameters. For BI, the best-fit substitution model was estimated with jModeltest v.2.17 [26]. Four Markov chains were run for 0.3 and 20 million generations for the Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. datasets, respectively, until the split deviation frequency values were lower than 0.01. Trees were sampled every 100 generations. The first quarter of the trees, which represented the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded, and the remaining trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities (BPP) in the majority rule consensus tree.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

Thirty-nine ITS and 39 28S sequences were newly generated in this study (Table 1). The Peniophoraceae dataset contained 33 ITS and 34 28S sequences from 34 samples representing 13 genera and the outgroup, and it had an aligned length of 2313 characters, of which 544 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 5000 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 2605, CI = 0.528, RI = 0.568, RC = 0.300, HI = 0.472). The Peniophora s.l. dataset contained 113 ITS and 97 28S sequences from 114 samples representing 63 taxa and the outgroup, and it had an aligned length of 1993 characters, of which 350 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded 5000 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1973, CI = 0.372, RI = 0.698, RC = 0.260, HI = 0.628). The jModelTest suggested GTR+I+G as the best-fit model of nucleotide evolution for both Peniophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. datasets. The average standard deviation of split frequencies of BI was 0.004389 (for the Peniophoraceae dataset) and 0.004179 (for the Peniophora s.l. dataset) at the end of the run. ML and BI analyses resulted in almost identical tree topologies compared to the MP analysis. The MP trees of Penophoraceae and Peniophora s.l. are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively, with the parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back) labeled along the branches.
Table 1. Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses. New species are set in bold with type specimens indicated with an asterisk (*).
Table 1. Species and sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses. New species are set in bold with type specimens indicated with an asterisk (*).
TaxaVoucherLocalityITS28SReference
Amylostereum chailletiiNH8031/1035RomaniaAF506406AF506406 [6]
Asterostroma laxumEL33-99EstoniaAF506410AF506410 [6]
A. muscicolaKHL9537Puerto RicoAF506409AF506409 [6]
Baltazaria eurasiaticogalactinaCBS666.84FranceAY293211 [27]
B. octopoditesFLOR 56449BrazilMH260025MH260047 [28]
Confertobasidium olivaceoalbumFP90196USAAF511648AF511648 [6]
Dichostereum effuscatumGG930915FranceAF506390AF506390 [6]
D. pallescensNH7046/673CanadaAF506392AF506392 [6]
Gloiothele lactescensEL8-98SwedenAF506453AF506453 [6]
G. lamellosaKHL11031VenezuelaAF506454AF506454 [6]
Lachnocladium schweinfurthianumKM 49740CameroonMH260033MH260051 [28]
L. sp.KHL10556JamaicaAF506461AF506461 [6]
Metulodontia niveaNH13108/2712RussiaAF506423AF506423 [6]
Peniophora albobadiaCBS329.66FranceMH858809MH870448 [9]
P. albobadiaHe2159USAMK588755MK588795Present study
P. aurantiacaUBCF:19732HQ604854HQ604854
P. aurantiacaCBS396.50FranceMH856678MH868195 [9]
P. bicornisHe3609ChinaMK588763MK588803Present study
P. bicornisHe4767ChinaMK588764MK588804Present study
P. borbonicaHe4606ChinaMK588765MK588805Present study
P. borbonicaHe4597ChinaMK588766MK588806Present study
P. cinereaNH9808/1788SpainAF506424AF506424 [6]
P. cinereaCBS261.37BelgiumMH855905MH867412 [9]
P. cinereaHe3725ChinaMK588769MK588809Present study
P. crassitunicataCBS663.91ReunionMH862292MH873972 [9]
P. crassitunicataHe3814ChinaMK588770MK588810Present study
P. cremicolorHe5380 *ChinaMK588791MK588831Present study
P. duplexTPDuB1022AF119519 [29]
P. duplexCBS286.58CanadaMH857787MH869321 [9]
P. erikssoniiCBS287.58FranceMH857788MH869322 [9]
P. erikssoniiCui11871ChinaMK588771MK588811Present study
P. eximaT-523USAMK588772MK588812Present study
P. fasticataCBS942.96EthiopiaMH862624 [9]
P. fissilisCBS681.91ReunionMH862298MH873975 [9]
P. fissilisCBS684.91Mascarene IslandsMH862299MH873976 [9]
P. gilbertsoniiCBS357.95USAMH862528MH874164 [9]
P. gilbertsoniiCBS360.95USAMH862530MH874165 [9]
P. guadelupensisCBS715.91GuadeloupeMH862304MH873977 [9]
P. halimiCBS863.84FranceMH861844MH873532 [9]
P. halimiCBS864.84FranceMH861845MH873533 [9]
P. incarnataNH10271/1909DanmarkAF506425AF506425 [6]
P. incarnataCBS399.50FranceMH856681MH868198 [9]
P. junipericolaCBS349.54SwedenMH857354 [9]
P. junipericolaHe2462ChinaMK588773MK588813Present study
P. kuehneriCBS719.91Mascarene IslandsMH862307MH873980 [9]
P. kuehneriHe4745ChinaMK588757MK588797Present study
P. kuehneroidesCBS731.91Mascarene IslandsMH862317MH873989 [9]
P. kuehneroidesCBS732.91Mascarene IslandsMH862318MH873990 [9]
P. laeteCBS256.56FranceMH857617MH869165 [9]
P. laeteFCUG 2681RussiaGU322869 [30]
P. lassaSP6129RussiaKJ509191 [31]
P. lassaHe3052ChinaMK588758MK588798Present study
P. lassaDai17081AChinaMK588759MK588799Present study
P. laurentiiCBS325.73NorwayMH872397 [9]
P. laxitextaBAFC 3309ArgentinaFJ882040 [32]
P. laxitextaLGMF1159BrazilJX559580 [33]
P. lilaceaCBS337.66ArmeniaMH858813MH870452 [9]
P. limitataolrim963LithuaniaAY787678 [34]
P. lyciiCBS264.56FranceMH857624MH869169 [9]
P. lyciiBoid-437FranceMK588774MK588814Present study
P. majorHe5528 *ChinaMK588792MK588832Present study
P. malaiensisCBS679.91SingaporeMH862297MH873974 [9]
P. manshuricaHe2956ChinaMK588776MK588816Present study
P. manshuricaHe3729ChinaMK588777MK588817Present study
P. meridionalisCBS289.58FranceMH857789MH869323 [9]
P. molestaCBS677.91GabonMH862295 [9]
P. molestaCBS676.91GabonMH862294MH873973 [9]
P. monticolaCBS649.91ReunionMH862289MH873970 [9]
P. nudaHe5280ChinaMK588778MK588818Present study
P. nudaHHB-4916-SpUSAMK588779MK588819Present study
P. ovalisporaCBS653.91Mascarene IslandsMH862290MH873971 [9]
P. parvocystidiataCBS716.91GuadeloupeMH862305MH873978 [9]
P. piceaeolrim10SwedenAY781264 [35]
P. piceae209RussiaJX507718 [36]
P. pilatianaCBS265.56FranceMH857625MH869170 [9]
P. pilatianaCBS-A1/A2MK588780MK588820Present study
P. piniHjm 18143SwedenEU118651EU118651 [7]
P. piniCBS274.56FranceMH857632MH869177 [9]
P. pithyaCBS277.56FranceMH857635MH869180 [9]
P. pithyaHe3107ChinaMK588781MK588821Present study
P. polygoniaCBS404.50FranceMH856684MH868201 [9]
P. polygoniaHe4651ChinaMK588782MK588822Present study
P. proximaCBS405.50FranceMH856685MH868202 [9]
P. proximaHe5498ChinaMK588783MK588823Present study
P. pseudopiniTPPpB1007AF119514 [29]
P. pseudopiniDAOM-30124-SpCanadaMK588784MK588824Present study
P. pseudoversicolorCBS338.66FranceMH858814MH870453 [9]
P. pseudoversicolorHe5132ChinaMK588785MK588825Present study
P. quercinaCBS407.50FranceMH856687MH868204 [9]
P. quercinaCBS408.50FranceMH856688MH868205 [9]
P. reidiiCBS397.83FranceMH861616MH873334 [9]
P. rhoicaCBS943.96EthiopiaMH862625MH874246 [9]
P. roseoalbaCLZhao3513ChinaON786559OP380690 [16]
P. roseoalbaCLZhao9401ChinaON786560 [16]
P. roseoalbaHe5031ChinaOP872571OP872575Present study
P. rufaCBS351.59CanadaMH857891MH869432 [9]
P. rufaHe2788ChinaMK588786MK588826Present study
P. rufomarginataCBS281.56FranceMH857639MH869183 [9]
P. rufomarginataCBS282.56FranceMH857640MH869184 [9]
P. septentrionalisCBS294.58CanadaMH857791MH869325 [9]
P. shenghuaeHe3507 *ChinaMK588788MK588828Present study
P. shenghuaeHe3535ChinaMK588789MK588829Present study
P. shenghuaeHe5447ChinaMK588790MK588830Present study
P. simulansCBS874.84FranceMH861849MH873537 [9]
P. simulansCBS875.84FranceMH861850MH873538 [9]
P. sphaerocystidiataHHB-8827-SpUSAMK588787MK588827Present study
P. subsalmoneaCBS696.91Mascarene IslandsMH862302 [9]
P. subsalmoneaCBS697.91Mascarene IslandsMH862303 [9]
P. taiwanensisHe4870ChinaMK588775MK588815Present study
P. taiwanensisWu 9206-28ChinaMK588793MK588833Present study
P. taiwanensisWu 9209-14ChinaMK588794MK588834Present study
P. tamaricicolaCBS438.62MoroccoMH858203MH869802 [9]
P. tamaricicolaCBS439.62MoroccoMH858204MH869803 [9]
P. trigonospermaCBS402.83FranceMH861618MH873335 [9]
P. trigonospermaHe3602ChinaMK588762MK588802Present study
P. tristiculaCBS210.63PakistanMH858266 [9]
P. tristiculaHe4775ChinaMH669235MH669239 [37]
P. versicolorCBS358.61MoroccoMH858082MH869651 [9]
P. versiformisCBS358.54FranceMH857360MH868902 [9]
P. versiformisHe3029ChinaMK588756MK588796Present study
P. vietnamensisHe5242VietnamMK588760MK588800Present study
P. vietnamensisHe5252 *VietnamMK588761MK588801Present study
P. violaceolividaCBS348.52FranceMH857077MH868613 [9]
P. yunnanensiCLZhao3978ChinaOP380617OP380689 [16]
P. yunnanensiCLZhao7347ChinaOP380616 [16]
Scytinostroma jacksoniiNH6626/635CanadaAF506467AF506467 [6]
S. portentosumEL11-99SwedenAF506470AF506470 [6]
S. renisporumCBS770.86IndonesiaMH862050MH873737 [9]
Vararia investiensTAA164122NorwayAF506484AF506484 [6]
V. ochroleucaJS24400NorwayAF506485AF506485 [6]
Vesiculomyces citrinusEL53-97SwedenAF506486AF506486 [6]
In the trees, species of Peniophora s.l. including the type species of Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella formed a strongly supported clade (95/95/1 in Figure 1, 100/100/1 in Figure 2). Four distinct lineages corresponding to Peniophora cremicolor, P. major, P. shenghuae and P. vietnamensis spp. nov. were recovered. For other sequences generated in this study, they formed distinct lineages alone or together with sequences from GenBank and represented known species.

3.2. Taxonomy

Peniophora Cooke, Grevillea 8 (no. 45): 20, 1879, emended
Basidiomes annual or perennial, resupinate, effused or effused-reflexed, adnate or sometimes loosening with age, membranaceous, ceraceous or coriaceous, usually stratified in section. Reflexed parts narrow, velutinous, felty to tomentose. Hymenophore smooth or tuberculate, rarely raduloid or merulioid, reddish, orange, pink, violaceous, gray, cream-colored, ochraceous, brown to dark brown; margin indistinct to fibrillose, adnate or slightly elevated, usually curved inside in reflexed parts when dry and old, concolorous or darker than hymenophore surface. Hyphal system monomitic or dimitic. Skeletal hyphae thick-walled, yellowish brown, dominated in the subiculum. Generative hyphae colorless to yellowish brown, thin- to thick-walled, with or without clamps. Dendrohyphidia present in some species, colorless or brown, thin- or thick-walled. Lamprocystidia present in most species, subulate or subcylindrical, colorless to brown, mostly thick-walled, encrusted with crystals. Gloeocystidia present or not, fusiform, subclavate to subcylindrical, colorless, thin- to thick-walled, empty or with contents. Basidia clavate to subcylindrical, sometimes flexuous, thin- to slightly thick-walled, with (2–) 4 sterigmata. Basidiospores colorless, usually cylindrical, allantoid or ellipsoid, rarely ovoid, subglobose, lacrimoid, pyriform or triangular, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, spore print mostly pink.
Notes—According to the phylogenetic analyses, the morphological characters used to delimit the three genera, Peniophora s.s., Dendrophora and Duportella, are not reliable. Thus, we propose to use a broad concept for Peniophora, which includes taxa possessing resupinate to effused-reflexed basidiomes with a bright or dull hymenophore surface, a monomitic or dimitic hyphal system with simple-septate or clamped generative hyphae, colorless or brown lamprocystidia and differently shaped basidiospores. However, we believe that the simultaneous presences of lamprocystidia and gloeocystidia, and the inamyloid basidiospores can be regarded as the synapomorphic traits for Peniophora in Russulales.
Peniophora cremicolor Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 3
MycoBank: MB846853
Type—CHINA, Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead but still attached branch of angiosperm tree, 6 April 2018, He 5380 (BJFC 026441, holotype).
Etymology—refers to the species having the cream color of the dried basidiomes.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, adnate or slightly detached from substrate with age, membranaceous to coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 20 cm long, 2 cm wide, 200 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, orange yellow [4B(7–8)] when fresh, cream [4A3] to grayish yellow [4B3] after dry, not cracked, unchanged in KOH; margin thinning out, fimbriate and white when juvenile, becoming indistinct and concolorous with hymenophore surface when mature.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum well-developed, colorless, with a compact texture; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, agglutinated, more or less parallel to substrate, 2–4 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening with age, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, agglutinated, interwoven, 2–3.5 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, metuloid, subulate, colorless, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in the middle and upper parts, embedded, with a basal simple septum, 32–70 × 6–12 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia subcylindrical to subclavate, usually with one or two contractions, empty or sometimes with contents, colorless, slightly thick-walled in most parts, slightly thickening toward the base, with a basal simple septum, smooth, 50–80 × 7–12 μm. Basidia clavate, colorless, slightly thick-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, usually projecting beyond the hymenium, 45–65 × 8–12 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, bearing a distinct apiculus, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 9–13 × 6–7 µm, L = 11.3 µm, W = 6.3 µm, Q = 1.8 (n = 60/2).
Additional specimen examined—CHINA, Fujian Province, Wuyishan County, Wuyishan Nature Reserve, on dead but still attached branch of angiosperm tree, 6 April 2018, He 5385 (BJFC 026446).
Notes—Peniophora cremicolor is characterized by the cream-colored basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, numerous lamprocystidia and gloeocystidia, large ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. cremicolor formed a distinct lineage sister to P. fasticata Boidin & Lanq., P. subsalmonea Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles and P. rhoica, all of which have cylindrical to allantoid basidiospores [5]. Morphologically, P. erikssonii Boidin is similar to P. cremicolor by having orange yellow basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae and ellipsoid basidiospores, but differs in having larger lamprocystidia (50–110 × 8–15 µm), gloeocystidia (70–140 × 10–15 µm) and basidiospores (13–20 × 8–13 µm) [5]. Peniophora proxima Bres. is similar to P. cremicolor by sharing same size of basidiospores but differs in having clamped generative hyphae and smaller lamprocystidia (15–40 × 5–7 µm) [38].
Peniophora major Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 4
MycoBank: MB846854
Type—CHINA, Guizhou Province, Jiangkou County, Fanjingshan Nature Reserve, on dead angiosperm branch, 11 July 2018, He 5528 (BJFC 026589, holotype).
Etymology—refers to the species having large lamprocystidia, gloeocystidia and basidiospores.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, inseparable from substrate, coriaceous, up to 35 cm long, 3 cm wide, 350 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, pale orange [6A3], orange grey [6B2] to grayish orange [6B(3–4)], not cracked, unchanged in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, concolorous with hymenophore surface.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum thin, yellowish brown, with a compact texture; hyphae colorless to pale yellow, thick-walled, smooth, moderately septate, rarely branched, densely agglutinated, more or less parallel to substrate, 3–5 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, agglutinated, interwoven, 2–4 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, metuloid, subulate, colorless or pale yellow at base with age, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in the middle and upper parts, embedded or projecting beyond the hymenium, with a basal simple septum, 40–105 × 11–16 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia subclavate to subcylindrical, colorless, slightly thick-walled, smooth, often with contents, with a basal simple septum, 40–85 × 7–10 μm. Basidia subclavate, usually with a contraction in the upper part, colorless, slightly thick-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 35–50 × 8–9 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores cylindrical, usually slightly concaved in one side, bearing a distinct apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 10–14 × 4.8–6 µm, L = 12.2 µm, W = 5.1 µm, Q = 2.4 (n = 30/1).
Notes—Peniophora major is characterized by the grayish basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, and large lamprocystidia, gloeocystidia and basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. major formed a sister lineage to P. limitata (Chaillet ex Fr.) Cooke, but their relationship was not well-supported. Morphologically, P. limitata differs from P. major by clamped generative hyphae, the absence of gloeocystidia, and smaller lamprocystidia (25–60 × 8–12 µm) and basidiospores (7.5–12 × 2.5–3.5 µm) [5]. Peniophora coprosmae G. Cunn. from Australia and New Zealand is similar to P. major by sharing distinct gloeocystidia and large cylindrical basidiospores, but it differs in having clamped generative hyphae, slightly shorter lamprocystidia (35–80 µm long) and slightly smaller basidiospores (9–11.5 × 4–5 µm) [5].
Peniophora shenghuae Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 5
MycoBank: MB846855
Type—CHINA, Yunnan Province, Luquan County, Zhuanlong Town, on dead angiosperm branch, 4 December 2015, He 3507 (BJFC 021904, holotype).
Etymology—Named to honor Dr. Sheng-Hua Wu (National Museum of Natural Science, Taiwan) who contributed to the taxonomy of Peniophora s.l. and other corticioid fungi in Taiwan.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, coriaceous, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 9 cm long, 3 cm wide, 200 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, pale orange [5A3], orange gray [5B2] to brownish orange [5C (3–6)], not cracked or with scattered crevices when dry, slightly darkening in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, usually darker than hymenophore surface, brown.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum yellowish brown, with a compact texture, up to 60 µm thick; hyphae colorless to pale yellow, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, interwoven, densely agglutinated, 2–4 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, composed of lamprocystidia, hyphae and collapsed hymenial elements; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, tightly interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia abundant, subulate, colorless, thick-walled, heavily encrusted with crystals in most parts, mostly embedded or slightly projecting beyond the hymenium, with a basal simple septum, 20–60 × 8–16 μm (with encrustations). Gloeocystidia fusiform, usually with a small apical papilla, flexuous, colorless, slightly thick-walled, smooth, empty or with content, 28–50 × 5–8 μm. Basidia subclavate to subcylindrical, usually with several contractions, flexuous, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 24–45 × 5–7 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores cylindrical, bearing a distinct apiculus, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, inamyloid, acyanophilous, 7.5–10 (–10.5) × 3–4 µm, L = 9.1 µm, W = 3.3 µm, Q = 2.8 (n = 30/1).
Additional specimens examined—CHINA, Yunnan Province, Luquan County, Zhuanlong Town, on dead angiosperm branch, 4 December 2015, He 3506 (BJFC 021903) & He 3535 (BJFC 021933); Guizhou Province, Chishui County, Suoluo Nature Reserve, on dead liana, 7 July 2018, He 5447 (BJFC 026508).
Notes—Peniophora shenghuae is characterized by the grayish orange basidiomes, simple-septate generative hyphae, numerous strongly encrusted lamprocystidia, papillated gloeocystidia and cylindrical basidiospores. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), P. shenghuae formed a strongly supported lineage with P. reidii Boidin & Lanq. Meanwhile, morphologically, P. reidii is similar to P. shenghuae by sharing simple-septate generative hyphae, papillated gloeocystidia and same size, cylindrical basidiospores. However, P. reidii has thicker basidiomes (up to 0.6 mm) and wider, sometimes bifurcate lamprocystidia (12–20 μm wide) [5]. The occurrence of P. reidii in Taiwan needs to be confirmed [11]. Peniophora borbonica Boidin & Gilles is similar to P. shenghuae by sharing simple-septate generative hyphae, fusiform gloeocystidia and cylindrical basidiospores, but it differs in having thicker basidiomes (up to 1.2 mm thick), slightly thick-walled basidia and slightly slender basidiospores (2.7–3.5 μm wide) [5]. Two specimens collected from Taiwan were identified as P. borbonica by us, which formed a distinct lineage distantly related to the lineage of P. shenghuae and P. reidii (Figure 2).
Peniophora vietnamensis Y.L. Xu, Y. Tian & S.H. He, sp. nov. Figure 6
MycoBank: MB846856
Type—VIETNAM, Lam Dong Province, Bi Doup Nui Ba National Park, on dead Araceae plant, 15 October 2017, He 5252 (BJFC 024770, holotype).
Etymology—refers to the species being found in Vietnam.
Fruiting body—Basidiomes annual, resupinate, effused, closely adnate, first as small colonies, later confluent up to 9 cm long, 1 cm wide, 260 µm thick in section. Hymenophore smooth, brownish orange [6C(5–7)] to light brown [6D(6–8)], not cracked or finely cracked with age, turning reddish brown in KOH; margin thinning out, indistinct, concolorous or darker than hymenophore surface.
Microscopic structures—Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple-septate. Subiculum indistinct or absent; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, rarely branched, moderately septate, interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam. Subhymenium thickening, with numerous lamprocystidia; hyphae colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, interwoven, 1.5–2.5 µm in diam. Lamprocystidia numerous, subulate, usually bifurcate, with one or two secondary septa, yellowish brown, distinctly thick-walled, slightly encrusted with fine crystals in the apex, embedded or slightly projecting beyond the hymenium, 25–40 × 5–10 μm. Gloeocystidia subulate, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, usually with one secondary septum, usually empty in the apical part, with contents in the basal part, 28–50 × 5–8 μm. Basidia subclavate, with a contraction in the middle part, colorless, thin-walled, with a basal simple septum and four sterigmata, 23–32 × 6–10 μm; basidioles numerous, in shape similar to basidia but slightly smaller. Basidiospores oblong cylindrical, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, inamyloid, cyanophilous when thick-walled, 12–16.5 (–17) × 4–6 µm, L = 14.5 µm, W = 4.5 µm, Q = 3.2–3.3 (n = 60/2).
Additional specimen examined—VIETNAM, Lam Dong Province, Bi Doup Nui Ba National Park, on dead Araceae plant, 15 October 2017, He 5242 (BJFC 024760).
Notes—Peniophora vietnamensis is characterized by its brownish orange basidiomes on Araceae plant, simple-septate generative hyphae, brown lamprocystidia, subulate gloeocystidia and oblong cylindrical basidiospores. In the phylogenetic trees (Figure 1 and Figure 2), P. vietnamensis and P. trigonosperma Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles formed a strongly supported lineage. Both species grow on palm trees and have similar brown lamprocystidia, however, P. trigonosperma differs in having clamped hyphae, cylindrical to fusiform gloeocystidia and triangular basidiospores [5]. Duportella rhoica Boidin & Lanq. is similar to P. vietnamensis by sharing oblong cylindrical basidiospores (10–14.5 × 4–6 µm) but differs in having a dimitic hyphal system with skeletoid hyphae and clamped generative hyphae and larger fusiform gloeocystidia (60–90 × 5–12 µm) [5].
Peniophora globispora Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, nom. & comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846863
Duportella sphaerospora G. Cunn., Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 85: 96 (1957).
Notes—Duportella sphaerospora is characterized by the large globose to subglobose basidiospores (10–12 × 9–12 µm) [5]. Since the epithet ‘sphaerospora’ was used in Peniophora for another species (P. sphaerospora Höhn. & Litsch. = Hypochnicium sphaerosporum (Höhn. & Litsch.) J. Erikss.), we propose the new name and new combination, Peniophora globispora, for this species.
Peniophora jordaoensis (Hjortstam & Ryvarden) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846857
Duportella jordaoensis Hjortstam & Ryvarden, Synopsis Fungorum 18: 20 (2004).
Notes—The species was originally described from Sao Paulo, Brazil, and it is known only from the type locality so far. Although sequences of the species are unavailable at present, morphologically, it has typical characteristics of Peniophora, such as the presence of both gloeocystidia and lamprocystidia, and suballantoid to allantoid basidiospores [39]. Meanwhile, the felted subiculum and brownish metuloid cystidia of the species can be seen in other species of Peniophora.
Peniophora kuehneroides (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846858
Duportella kuehneroides Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 98 (1991).
Notes—Two strains (CBS 731.91 and CBS 732.91) of Duportella kuehneroides from Mascarene Islands isolated and identified by Paule Lanquetin formed a distinct lineage in the large clade of Peniophora (Figure 1 and Figure 2). We propose the new combination based on both morphological and molecular evidence [5].
Peniophoralassa (Spirin & Kout) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846859
Duportella lassa Spirin & Kout, Mycotaxon 130 (2): 484 (2015).
Notes—The species was recently described from northeast Russia [31]. A specimen from northeast China (He 3052) and the holotype of the species (Spirin 6129) formed a strongly supported lineage sister to other species of Peniophora. The close relationship between Duportella lassa and Peniophora was also noticed by Spirin and Kout [31]. Peniophora lassa is a common species in the Beijing area according to the authors’ investigations carried out recently.
Specimens examined—CHINA, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Genhe County, Greater Khingan Mountains Nature Reserve, on trunk of Salix, 17 October 2015, He 3052 (BJFC 021442); Beijing, Mentougou District, Tanzhe Temple Park, on dead branch of Syringa, 17 July 2020, He 6511 (BJFC 033459); Jietai Temple Park, on dead branch of Lonicera, 7 August 2020, He 6735 (BJFC 033683); Pinggu District, Jinhai Lake Park, on trunk of Cotinus, 11 August 2020, He 6766 (BJFC 033714); Yanqing District, Songshan Nature Reserve, on dead branch of Syringa, 3 September 2020, He 6943 (BJFC 033892).
Peniophora miranda (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846860
Duportella miranda Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 100 (1991).
Notes—The species is characterized by the numerous brown lamprocystidia and subovoid basidiospores [3]. Boidin et al. (1998) showed that P. miranda was closely related to other Peniophora species, although the sequence is unavailable for us.
Peniophora pirispora (Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846861
Duportella pirispora Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 104 (1991).
Notes—The species is characterized by the brown lamprocystidia and lacrimoid to pyriform or subreniform basidiospores. Although the sequences of the species are unavailable, present molecular evidence indicated that Peniophora includes species with differently shaped basidiospores (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Peniophora rhoica (Boidin & Lanq.) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846862
Duportella rhoica Boidin & Lanq., Cryptogamie Mycologie 16 (2): 89 (1995).
Notes—In our phylogenetic trees (Figure 1 and Figure 2), one strain (CBS 943.96) isolated from the holotype of Duportella rhoica (LY 14759) was nested within the Peniophora clade. Thus, we propose the new combination based on molecular evidence and morphological descriptions and illustrations [40].
Peniophora tristiculoides (Sheng H. Wu & Z.C. Chen) Y.L. Xu & S.H. He, comb. nov.
MycoBank: MB846864
Duportella tristiculoides Sheng H. Wu & Z.C. Chen, Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Science 4: 108 (1993).
Notes—Morphologically, Duportella tristiculoides is close to D. tristicula (Berk. & Broome) Reinking, which was the type species of Duportella and nested within the Peniophora clade (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Duportella tristiculoides has been only reported from the type locality in Taiwan and not been sequenced so far.
Peniophora malaiensis Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 137 (1991)
Peniophora taiwanensis Sheng H. Wu, Mycotaxon 85: 197 (2003)
Notes—Our phylogenetic analyses indicated that the holotype of P. malaiensis, LY 8292 from Singapore (CBS679.91), formed a strongly supported lineage with three specimens collected from Guangxi Autonomous Region and Taiwan, China, including the paratype of P. taiwanensis, Wu 9206-28 (Figure 2). The ITS sequence similarity between LY 8292 and Wu 9206-28 is 99.16% (5 base pair differences). Morphologically, the two species are very similar except that P. taiwanensis has narrower basidiospores (1.8–2.2 μm) than P. malaiensis (2–2.7 μm) [3,11]. However, our measurements of the basidiospore width of the specimen He 4870 match that of P. malaiensis (2–3 μm). Therefore, we believe that the difference in the basidiospore width is within the specific range and treat P. taiwanensis as a later synonym of P. malaiensis.
Specimen examined—CHINA, Guangxi Autonomous Region, Jinxiu County, Dayaoshan Nature Reserve, Shengtangshan, on fallen angiosperm trunk, 15 July 2015, He 4870 (BJFC 024389).
Duportella renispora Boidin, Lanq. & Gilles, Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 107 (3): 104 (1991).
Notes—The strain (CBS 733.91) isolated from the holotype of the D. renispora (LY 12699) was sequenced by Vu et al. [9]. The blast results of the ITS (MH862319) and 28S (MH873991) sequences showed that the species does not belong to Peniophora s.l. but is close to Amylostereum Boidin. Morphologically, the thinly encrusted brown cystidia and absence of subiculum of the species do match the characteristics of Amylostereum, which, however, has amyloid basidiospores. In order to confirm the identity of the species, the type specimen should be checked in the future.
A key to Peniophora species in China
1. Dendrohyphidia well-developed, brownP. versiformis
1. Dendrohyphidia absent, or colorless when present2
2. Lamprocystidia brown over the entire length3
2. Lamprocystidia colorless or only brown at the basal part6
3. Skeletocystidia present4
3. Skeletocystidia absent5
4. Basidiospores 10–12.5 × 3.7–4.2 µmP. tristicula
4. Basidiospores 5.2–7.5 × 2–3.5 µmP. kuehneri
5. Basidiospores triangular, on palmsP. trignosperma
5. Basidiospores cylindrical to narrowly ellipsoid or ovoid, on angiospermsP. lassa
6. Dendrohyphidia present, often colorless and may be difficult to see7
6. Dendrohyphidia absent8
7. Lamprocystidia absent; basidiospores > 7.5 µm longP. polygonia
7. Lamprocystidia present; basidiospores < 7.5 µm longP. meridionalis
8. Basidiospores ellipsoid or ovoid9
8. Basidiospores cylindrical or allantoid12
9. Basidiospores ovoidP. roseoalba
9. Basidiospores ellipsoid10
10. Generative hyphae with clampsP. proxima
10. Generative hyphae without clamps11
11. Basidiospores 9–13 × 6–7 µmP. cremicolor
11. Basidiospores 11–20 × 8–14 µmP. erikssonii
12. Basidiomes red13
12. Basidiomes grey, cream, pale orange, pinkish, yellowish or purplish14
13. Basidiomes pulvinate, only found on PopulusP. rufa
13. Basidiomes effused, found on other hostsP. pseudoversicolor
14. Generative hyphae without clamps15
14. Generative hyphae with clamps19
15. Basidia with two sterigmataP. bicornis
15. Basidia with four sterigmata16
16. Basidiospores > 10 µm longP. major
16. Basidiospores < 10 µm long17
17. Basidiospores < 7 µm longP. malaiensis
17. Basidiospores > 7 µm long18
18. Basidiomes up to 1.2 mm thick; basidia thick-walledP. borbonica
18. Basidiomes up to 200 µm thick; basidia thin-walledP. shenghuae
19. Gloeocystidia indistinct or absent20
19. Gloeocystidia present22
20. Basidiomes pinkish, effused-reflexed, usually on Quercus.P. manshurica
20. Basidiomes greyish, resupinate, on gymnosperms or angiosperms21
21. Lamprocystidia 40–80 × 6–14 µm; on JuniperusP. junipericola
21. Lamprocystidia 15–25 × 5–10 µm; on gymnosperms or angiospermsP. cinerea
22. Gloeocystidia distinctly thick-walled, with walls up to 2–3 µm thickP. crassitunicata
22. Gloeocystidia thin- to slightly thick-walled, with walls < 1 µm thick23
23. Lamprocystidia up to 20 µm wide; basidiospores up to 7 µm long P. pithya
23. Lamprocystidia up to 12 µm wide; basidiospores up to 10 µm long24
24. Gloeocystidia 30–80 × 8–20 µm; basidiospores 2.5–3.5 µm wideP. nuda
24. Gloeocystidia 12.5–58 × 5.5–15.5 µm; basidiospores 3–5.5 µm wideP. yunnanensis

4. Discussion

The modern molecular phylogenetics have significantly changed the taxonomic systems of wood-inhabiting fungi in recent years. On the one hand, many new lineages and taxa were found and described, and on another hand, some morphologically dissimilar taxa were proved to be closely related in phylogeny [41,42,43,44,45]. Our results indicated that in the Peniophora s.l. group, the morphological characters, such as the color of lamprocystidia and dendrohyphidia used for generic delimitation are not reliable. As already shown in other studies [46,47,48,49,50], the identities of some genera erected based merely on morphology or together with phylogenetic analyses of not well-sampled datasets need to be confirmed.
The Peniophoraceae is a well-supported large family in Russulales, most species of which have resupinate basidiomes and non-poroid hymenophores growing on twigs, branches or trunks of woody plants or bamboos [5,51]. The species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Peniophoraceae in China have been investigated and studied [16,37,52,53,54,55], and this study is a part of this consecutive research. However, the two large genera in Peniophoraceae, Scytinostroma Donk and Vararia P. Karst., that are closely related and were shown to be polyphyletic [6,7,28], have not been sufficiently studied worldwide. We are going to carry out a complete morphological and phylogenetic analyses of the Peniophoraceae by adding a lot of Scytinostroma-Vararia samples from Asia accumulated by the authors in recent years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.H.; methodology, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; performing the experiment, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; formal analysis, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; validation, Y.-L.X., Y.T. and S.-H.H.; resources, S.-H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-L.X.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.H.; visualization, Y.-L.X. and Y.T.; supervision, S.-H.H.; project administration, S.-H.H.; funding acquisition, S.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 31750001; 31670013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eriksson, J. A taxonomical study with special reference to the Swedish species. Symb. Bot. Ups. 1950, 10, 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boidin, J.; Lanquetin, P. Peniophora (sect. Duportella) kuehneri et halimi novae sp.; réflexions sur les genres Peniophora et Duportella. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 1974, 43, 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boidin, J.; Lanquetin, P.; Gilles, G. Les Peniophoraceae de la zone intertropicale (Basidiomycètes, Aphyllophorales). A. Espèces paléotropicales. Bull. Trimest. Société Mycol. Fr. 1991, 107, 91–156. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boidin, J.; Mugnier, J.; Canales, R. Taxonomie molecularies des Aphyllophorales. Mycotaxon 1998, 66, 445–491. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andreasen, M.; Hallenberg, N. A taxonomic survey of the Peniophoraceae. Synop. Fungorum 2009, 26, 56–119. [Google Scholar]
  6. Larsson, E.; Larsson, K.H. Phylogenetic relationships of russuloid basidiomycetes with emphasis on aphyllophoralean taxa. Mycologia 2003, 95, 1037–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Larsson, K.H. Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 1040–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miller, S.L.; Larsson, E.; Larsson, K.H.; Verbeken, A.; Nuytinck, J. Perspectives in the new Russulales. Mycologia 2006, 98, 960–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; De Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 91, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, S.H. New records of the Corticiaceae from mainland China. Mycotaxon 2002, 82, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, S.H. A study of Peniophora species with simple-septate hyphae occurring in Taiwan. Mycotaxon 2003, 85, 187–199. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu, S.H. Twenty species of corticioid fungi newly recorded from China. Mycotaxon 2008, 104, 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, S.H. Survey of corticioid fungi in Taiwan, to 2010. Fungal Sci. 2010, 25, 49–60. [Google Scholar]
  14. Maekawa, N. Japanece Corticaceaea II. Rep. Tottori Mycol. Inst. 1994, 32, 1–123. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maekawa, N.; Yang, Z.L.; Zang, M. Corticioid Fungi (Basidiomycetes) collected in Sichuan Province, China. Mycotaxon 2002, 83, 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zou, L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, C. Four New Wood-Inhabiting Fungal Species of Peniophoraceae (Russulales, Basidiomycota) from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Methuen: London, UK, 1978; p. 493. [Google Scholar]
  18. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications. In Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  21. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Maddison, W.P.; Maddison, D.R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.5.1. 2018. Available online: http://www.mesquiteproject.org (accessed on 20 October 2022).
  23. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods); Version 4.0b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, UK, 2002; Available online: http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/ (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  24. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. ModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Binder, M.; Hibbett, D.S.; Larsson, K.H.; Larsson, E.; Langer, E.; Langer, G. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Syst. Biodivers. 2005, 3, 113–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leal-Dutra, C.A.; Neves, M.A.; Griffith, G.W.; Reck, M.A.; Clasen, L.A.; Dentinger, B.T. Reclassification of Parapterulicium Corner (Pterulaceae, Agaricales), contributions to Lachnocladiaceae and Peniophoraceae (Russulales) and introduction of Baltazaria gen. nov. MycoKeys 2018, 37, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hsiau, P.T.; Harrington, T.C. Phylogenetics and adaptations of basidiomycetous fungi fed upon by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Symbiosis 2003, 34, 111–131. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hallenberg, N.; Yurchenko, E.O.; Ghobad-Nejhad, M. Peniophora pseudonuda is a synonym of P. laeta. Mycotaxon 2010, 112, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spirin, V.; Kout, J. Duportella lassa sp. nov. from Northeast Asia. Mycotaxon 2015, 130, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Robles, C.A.; Carmarán, C.C.; Lopez, S.E. Screening of xylophagous fungi associated with Platanus acerifolia in urban landscapes: Biodiversity and potential biodeterioration. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 100, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hokama, Y.; Savi, D.C.; Assad, B.; Aluizio, R.; Gomes-Figueiredo, J.; Adamoski, D.; Glienke, C. Endophytic fungi isolated from Vochysia divergens in the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul: Diversity, phylogeny and biocontrol of Phyllosticta citricarpa. In Endophytic Fungi: Divers. Charact. Biocontrol; Hughes, E., Ed.; Nova Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 93–124. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lygis, V.; Vasiliauskas, R.; Larsson, K.H.; Stenlid, J. Wood-inhabiting fungi in stems of Fraxinus excelsior in declining ash stands of northern Lithuania, with particular reference to Armillaria cepistipes. Scand. J. For. Res. 2005, 20, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vasiliauskas, R.; Larsson, E.; Larsson, K.H.; Stenlid, J. Persistence and long-term impact of Rotstop biological control agent on mycodiversity in Picea abies stumps. Biol. Control. 2005, 32, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grum-Grzhimaylo, O.A.; Debets, A.J.; Bilanenko, E.N. The diversity of microfungi in peatlands originated from the White Sea. Mycologia 2016, 108, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, S.L.; He, S.H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Dichostereum (Russulales), with descriptions of three new species from southern China. MycoKeys 2018, 40, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boidin, J. Les Peniophoraceae des parties tempérées et froides de l’hémisphère nord (Basidiomycotina). Publ. Société Linnéenne Lyon 1994, 63, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hjortstam, K.; Ryvarden, L. Some new tropical genera and species of corticioid fungi (Basidiomycotina, Aphyllophorales). Synop. Fungorum 2004, 18, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  40. Boidin, J.; Lanquetin, P. Sur quelques corticiés (Basidiomycotina) de l’Ethiopie. Cryptogamie Mycologie 1995, 16, 85–99. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, C.L.; Cui, B.K.; Song, J.; Dai, Y.C. Fragiliporiaceae, a new family of Polyporales (Basidiomycota). Fungal Divers. 2015, 70, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.J.; Cui, B.K.; Dai, Y.C. Global diversity and molecular systematics of Wrightoporia s.l. (Russulales, Basidiomycota). Persoonia 2016, 37, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Han, M.L.; Chen, Y.Y.; Shen, L.L.; Song, J.; Vlasák, J.; Dai, Y.C.; Cui, B.K. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the brown-rot fungi: Fomitopsis and its related genera. Fungal Divers. 2016, 80, 343–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Cui, B.K.; Li, H.J.; Ji, X.; Zhou, J.L.; Song, J.; Si, J.; Dai, Y.C. Species diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of Polyporaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers. 2019, 97, 137–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, F.; Zhou, L.W.; Vlasák, J.; Dai, Y.C. Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with poroid hymenophore. Fungal Divers. 2022, 113, 1–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, C.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Wu, S.H. Species diversity, taxonomy and multi-gene phylogeny of phlebioid clade (Phanerochaetaceae, Irpicaceae, Meruliaceae) of Polyporales. Fungal Divers. 2021, 111, 337–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, S.H.; Dai, Y.C. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Hymenochaete and allied genera of Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers. 2012, 56, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Y.; Nakasone, K.K.; Chen, C.C.; Zhao, C.L.; Cao, T.; Yuan, H.S.; He, S.H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Cystostereaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): A new genus, five new species, and three new combinations. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, S.L.; Nakasone, K.K.; Wu, S.H.; He, S.H.; Dai, Y.C. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Lopharia s.s., Dendrodontia, Dentocorticium and Fuscocerrena (Basidiomycota, Polyporales). MycoKeys 2018, 32, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Riebeseh, J.; Yurchenko, E.; Nakasone, K.K.; Langer, E. Phylogenetic and morphological studies in Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with the addition of four new species. MycoKeys 2019, 47, 97–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yurchenko, E. The Genus Peniophora (Basidiomycota) of Eastern Europe: Morphology, Taxonomy, Ecology, Distribution; National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, VF Kuprevich Insitute of Experimental Botany: Minsk, Belarus, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dai, Y.C. A revised checklist of corticioid and hydnoid fungi in China for 2010. Mycoscience 2011, 52, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, H.; He, X.; Zhao, C.L. Scytinostroma yunnanense sp. nov. (Russulales, Basidiomycota) evidenced by morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses in China. Phytotaxa 2020, 451, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, S.L.; He, S.H. The genus Vararia (Russulales, Basidiomycota) in China. Two new species and two new Chinese records. Nord. J. Bot. 2016, 34, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, S.L.; Tian, Y.; Nie, T.; Thawthong, A.; Hyde, K.D.; Xu, L.L.; He, S.H. Updates on East Asian Asterostroma (Russulales, Basidiomycota): New species and new records from Thailand and China. Mycol. Prog. 2017, 16, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophoraceae. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species and new combinations are set in bold.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophoraceae. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species and new combinations are set in bold.
Jof 09 00093 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophora s.l. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species (purple) and new combinations (blue) are set in bold.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree obtained from maximum parsimony analysis of ITS-28S sequence data of Peniophora s.l. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap values (≥50%, front), likelihood bootstrap values (≥50%, middle) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95, back). New species (purple) and new combinations (blue) are set in bold.
Jof 09 00093 g002
Figure 3. Peniophora cremicolor ((a) from paratype BJFC 026446; (b–f) from the holotype BJFC 026441). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.
Figure 3. Peniophora cremicolor ((a) from paratype BJFC 026446; (b–f) from the holotype BJFC 026441). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.
Jof 09 00093 g003
Figure 4. Peniophora major (from the holotype BJFC 026589). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (be) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia.
Figure 4. Peniophora major (from the holotype BJFC 026589). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (be) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia.
Jof 09 00093 g004
Figure 5. Peniophora shenghuae (from the holotype BJFC 021904). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.
Figure 5. Peniophora shenghuae (from the holotype BJFC 021904). Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm; (bf) = 10 µm. (a). Basidiomes; (b). Basidiospores; (c). Basidia and a basidiole; (d). Gloeocystidia; (e). Lamprocystidia; (f). Hyphae from subiculum.
Jof 09 00093 g005
Figure 6. Peniophora vietnamensis ((a,cg) from the holotype BJFC 024770; (b) from the paratype BJFC 024760). Scale bars: (b,c) = 1 cm; (dg) = 10 µm. (ac). Basidiomes; (d). Basidiospores; (e). Basidia and basidioles; (f). Gloeocystidia; (g). Lamprocystidia.
Figure 6. Peniophora vietnamensis ((a,cg) from the holotype BJFC 024770; (b) from the paratype BJFC 024760). Scale bars: (b,c) = 1 cm; (dg) = 10 µm. (ac). Basidiomes; (d). Basidiospores; (e). Basidia and basidioles; (f). Gloeocystidia; (g). Lamprocystidia.
Jof 09 00093 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Y.-L.; Tian, Y.; He, S.-H. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota). J. Fungi 2023, 9, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010093

AMA Style

Xu Y-L, Tian Y, He S-H. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Yun-Lin, Yan Tian, and Shuang-Hui He. 2023. "Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota)" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop