Next Article in Journal
The Riboflavin Metabolism in Four Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Strains: Assessment in Oenological Condition and Potential Implications with the Light-Struck Taste
Next Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Peniophora Sensu Lato (Russulales, Basidiomycota)
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Genomic and Phenotypic Landscape of the Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phylogenetic Analyses and Morphological Studies Reveal Four New Species of Phellodon (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphology and Phylogeny of Lyophylloid Mushrooms in China with Description of Four New Species

1
Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010077
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 5 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny and Diversity of Forestry Fungi)

Abstract

:
The lyophylloid agarics are a group of ecologically highly diversified macrofungi, some of which are very popular edible mushrooms. However, we know little about lyophylloid species diversity in China. In this study, we described four new species from China: Lyophyllum atrofuscum, L. subalpinarum, L. subdecastes, and Ossicaulis sichuanensis. We conducted molecular phylogenetic analyses of Lyophyllaceae based on the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (nLSU) and the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS). Phylogenetic analyses by the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian inference showed that the four new species are unique monophyletic species. A key to the species of Lyophyllum from China and a key to Ossicaulis worldwide were given.

1. Introduction

While the importance of fungi as mutualists, decomposers, and pathogens is undisputed, researchers are just beginning to unravel the processes that shape their global species richness and distribution. Previous studies established the monophyly of Lyophyllaceae Jülich and positioned the family within the Tricholomatoid clade, and then Alvarado et al. revealed that Lyophyllaceae may be a putative wider concept or the existence of multiple lineages that are basal to it [1,2,3]. Several new genera established in the past decade are expected to reorganize the system, including Australocybe T.J. Baroni, N. Fechner & van de Peppel, Calocybella Vizzini, Consiglio & Setti, Clitolyophyllum E. Sesli, Vizzini & Contu, Myochromella V. Hofst., Clémençon, Moncalvo & Redhead, Phaeotephrocybe T.J. Baroni, T.W. Kuyper & van de Peppel, Nigrocarnea P. Sparre & Læssøe, Praearthromyces T.J. Baroni, T.W. Kuyper & van de Peppel, Sagaranella V. Hofst., Clémençon, Moncalvo & Redhead, etc. [1,4,5]. In addition, some species of Lyophyllum, Calocybe Kühner, Hypsizygus Singer, and Termitomyces R. Heim have edible value [6], and a few species have medicinal and significant economic importance [7,8,9,10]. In particular, Lyophyllum shimeji (Kawam.) Hongo has been recognized as a delicacy, and its price is second only to Tricholoma matsutake (S. Ito & S. Imai) Singer in Japan.
Lyophyllaceae has a worldwide distribution [11,12,13], with more than 200 species [14]. The unique characteristic that delimits Lyophyllaceae is the presence of siderophilous granulation in the basidia [15]. Lyophyllum P. Karst., is a type genus of Lyophyllaceae, and more than 40 species within this genus. The morphological classifications of Singer [16] were inconsistent with the molecular phylogenetic relationships of Lyophyllum [17,18], which explains the reason why some species of Lyophyllum used to be easily confused with Calocybe and Tephrocybe Donk [4,19]. The genus of Ossicaulis Redhead & Ginns was erected in 1985, with a north temperate distribution, and four species are known worldwide [20]. It is mainly characterized by adnate, sub-decurrent, or lamellae centrally adnexed to the eccentric stipe, tiny ellipsoid spores, and the presence of clamp connections [21].
Recently, several species of Lyophyllaceae have also been reported in China [22,23,24]. The genus Lyophyllum is represented by 14 species in China: L. decastes (Fr.) Singer, L. fumosum (Pers.) P.D. Orton, L. transforme (Lapl.) Singer, L. trigonosporum (Bres.) Kühner, L. loricatum (Fr.) Kühner, L. macrosporum Singer, L. semitale (Fr.) Kühner, L. shimeji, L. infumatum (Bres.) Kühner, L. immundum (Berk.) Kühner, L. pulvis-horrei E. Ludw. & Koeck, L. pusillum Clémençon & A.H. Sm., L. rhombisporum Shu H. Li & Y.C. Zhao, and L. sykosporum Hongo & Clémençon [25,26,27,28]. Similarly, the genus Ossicaulis is represented with two species in China: Ossicaulis lignatilis (Pers.) Redhead & Ginns and Ossicaulis yunnanensis L.P. Tang, N.K. Zeng & S.D. Yang [29,30].
During our macrofungal exploration of southwestern and northwestern China, we encountered the collections of Lyophyllaceae. Upon further morphological examination of the basidiomata and phylogenetic analyses of the internal transcribed space (ITS) and a larger subunit of the nuclear rDNA (28S), these collections presumably represent three new species of Lyophyllum and one new species of Ossicaulis, which are described in detail. Furthermore, the species of Lyophyllum in China are compared in detail, and a worldwide key for Ossicaulis is given.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Sampling

All the specimens used in this study were collected in 2018–2021. These samples were dried overnight using an electric oven at 40 °C and deposited in the Herbarium Mycology of Jilin Agricultural University (HMJAU).

2.2. Morphological Observation

The macro-morphological descriptions were recorded in the field, and images of the basidiocarps were taken in the field with an OLYMPUS E-P7. The color code and terminology followed Kornerup and Wanscher [31]. Tiny tissue was cut from the dried basidiomata using a sharp blade, and micro-morphological structures were observed via a light microscope (ZEISS Axioscope 5, ZEISS, Jena, Thuringia, Germany) performed in 5% KOH solution and then in Melzer’s reagent solution or Acetcoarmine solution. Twenty basidiospores and basidia were measured from each specimen. Dimensions are given as (a)b–c(d), of which ‘b–c’ refers to the minimum of 90% of the measured values, and a or d represents the extreme values. Factor Q refers to the aspect ratio of each basidiospore in the side view; Lm/Wm defines the average length/width of all measured basidiospores ± sample standard deviation.

2.3. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nLSU) sequences were amplified using primer pairs of ITS4/ITS5 and LR0R/LR5, respectively [32,33,34]. The reactions were performed with the following program: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min (ITS) or 3 min (nLSU), 35 cycles at 95 °C for 40 s, 58 °C (ITS) for 40 s or 52 °C (nLSU), and 72 °C for 80 s (ITS) or 120 s (nLSU); for terminal elongation the reaction batches were incubated at 72 °C for 10 min. Then, PCR productions were sent to Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) to be directly sequenced using an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

The newly generated sequences in this study have been deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 10 October 2022), with other similar sequences downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 10 October 2022) datasets, and Entoloma undatum (Gillet) M.M. Moser as the outgroup. For the datasets (see Table 1), the alignment was generated for ITS and nLSU datasets using the “L–INS–i” strategy of MAFFT v.7.017 [35]. Before performing phylogenetic analyses, start and end ambiguous sites were removed, and gaps were manually adjusted to optimize the alignment by BioEdit v7.1.3 [36] and then were combined by Phylosuite v1.2.2 [37]. The best-fit evolutionary model was estimated by using Modelfinder [38]. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using the Bayes inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). BI analysis using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were carried out with MrBayes 3.2.6 [39], running in 2,000,000 generations, and sampled every 1000 generations. The initial 25% of the sampled data were discarded as burn-in, other parameters were kept at the default settings. For ML analysis, the datasets were analyzed using IQ-TREE under an ultrafast bootstrap, with 5000 replicates [40]. The posterior probability ≥ 0.95 for Bayesian inference analysis (BI-PP) and bootstrap proportions ≥ 70% for ML analysis (ML-BP) were considered significant values. Trees were edited using FigTree version 1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 10 October 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny

Fourteen sequences were newly generated from specimens of Lyophyllum, and six sequences were newly generated from specimens of Ossicaulis, all of which were collected from China and deposited in GenBank (Table 1). A combined dataset of two markers, including 1616 bases, was used to execute the BI and ML analyses. Amongst the dataset, 841 were constant sites, 224 were variable and parsimony-uninformative sites, and 551 were parsimony-informative sites. Based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the GTR + F + I + G4 models were selected as the substitution model for the ITS and nLSU partitions. The phylogenetic construction performed by the BI and ML analyses showed a similar topology. Therefore, we selected the ML tree as the working phylogenetic hyphothesis, with the Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 70% labeled along the branches (Figure 1). In the phylogram, L. subdecastes, L. decastes, L. fumosum, and L. shimeji were grouped in Clade Ⅰ (sect. Difformia (Singer)). Lyophyllum ambustum (Fr.) Singer, L. anthracophilum (Lasch) M. Lange & Sivertsen, and L. atratum (Fr.) Singer were grouped in Clade Ⅱ. Lyophyllum atrofuscum related to L. moncalvoanum was grouped in Clade Ⅲ (sect. Lyophyllum (Singer)) with weak support. Lyophyllum subalpinarum related to L. cf. pulvis-horrei and L. semitale grouped were in Clade Ⅲ (sect. Lyophyllum (Singer)) showed weak support. In addition, Ossicaulis sichuanensis formed a clade with O. lachnopus (Fr.) Contu, O. lignatilis (Pers.) Redhead & Ginns, O. salomii Siquier & Bellanger, and O. yunnanensis.

3.2. Taxonomy

Lyophyllum atrofuscum S.W. Wei, Q. Wang & Y. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 2a–d and Figure 3)
MycoBank number. MB846029
Etymology. The specific name atrofuscum (Latin). “ater” refers to the black, sable, dark, gloomy; “fuscus” refers to the swarthy, dusky, dark.
Holotype. China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Lingzhi Prefecture, Lulang Town, Jiagapu, 29°40′ N, 94°43′ E, alt. 3664 m, 12 August 2021, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63456!, ITS = OP605494, 28S = OP605514).
Pileus 2.5–9.0 cm broad, hemispherical to broadly convex when young, becoming plane to plano-concave, often with depressed, center and in-rolled margin when mature, light brown (6D4), yellowish-brown (5D8), brownish-orange (7C3), to grayish-brown (7D3), dark at the center. Sometimes margin wavy, pileus context watery soaked in wet weather conditions, brown (7E8) or reddish-brown (8D6). It was staining bluish-gray to black immediately when broken. Context white, up to 0.5 cm thick at the pileus center, is thinner toward its margin and discolored when exposed or injured. Lamellae adnate to slightly decurrent, moderately broad, tapering toward the margin white at first, becoming yellowish-white (4A2), yellowish-white (3A2), to brownish-gray (6C3) with age, usually discoloring to dark at the edge when touched or injured, with 1–3 unequal lamellulae between two entire lamellae. Stipe 3.0–10.0 cm long, 0.7–1.5 cm thick, cylindrical to clavate, usually equal, occasionally enlarged at the base, white at first, grayish-white (6B1) with brownish-gray (6C2) when mature, usually paler than the pileus, sometimes nearly black in the upper, scarcely darkening below, longitudinally fibrillose, base white-mycelioid. Flour flavor.
Basidiospores (5.0)5.5–7(7.5) × 3.9–5.0(5.5) μm, Lm = 6.38 ± 0.67, Wm = 4.67 ± 0.48, Q = (1.1)1.2–1.5(1.7), Qm = 1.37 ± 0.13, ellipsoid, subrhomboid to irregular rhomboid, smooth, hyaline, thin-walled. Basidia mainly two–four spored, (27.3)27.5–36.5(37.0) × (6.8)7.5–10.0(10.5) μm, Q = (2.8)3.0–10.0(10.5), Qm = 4.04 ± 0.49, clavate, siderophilous granules abundant, some with basal clamp connections. Subhymenium is made up of inflated hyaline elements. Hymenophoral trama is regular, hyaline hyphae, made up of thin. Pleurocystidia scattered, 18.96–28.55 × 4.48–6.93 μm, long fusiform, narrowly lageniform to irregular, with subacute apex or long beak, thin-walled. Cheilocystidia not observed. Pileipellis composed of 4.0–9.5 μm wide hyphae, cylindrical hyphae, smooth, with intraparietal pigment. Stipitipellis arranged regular, hyphae parallel, not constricted at the septa, smooth, composed of 2.5–6.0 μm wide hyphae. Clamp connections are present.
Known distribution. Known to occur in the subalpine regions at high elevations (usually above alt. 3000 m) in Sichuan, Tibet, and Yunnan of Southwest China.
Habit and habitat. Scattered to gregarious on soil in forests dominated by Quercus semecarpifolia, from August to October.
Additional specimens examined. China. Sichuan Province: Ganzi Prefecture, Jiulong County, 29°5′ N, 101°23′ E, alt. 3375 m, 25 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63457); Jiulong County, Wuxuhai, 29°3′ N, 101°24′ E, alt. 3198 m, 26 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63458); Jiulong County, Jishoushan, 29°5′ N, 101°23′ E, alt. 3340 m, 23 August 2021, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63459), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63460). Xizang Autonomous Region: Lingzhi Prefecture, Lulang Town, Jiagapu, 29°40′ N, 94°43′ E, alt. 3664 m, 12 August 2021, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63461); Lingzhi Prefecture, Lulang Town, Gongcuo Lake, 29°45′ N, 94°44′ E, alt. 3368 m, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63462). Yunnan Province: Shangri-la City, Xiaozhongdian, 27°24′ N, 99°49′ E, alt. 3464 m, 29 August 2021, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63463), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63464), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63465), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63466).
Notes: Compared with the species with dark brown to fuscous pileus and black when bruised of the lamellae, L. bonii Contu, L. fuscobrunneum Dähncke, Contu & Vizzini, L. rhombisporum, and L. solidipes Clémençon & A.H.Sm. are similar to the new species. L. bonii from the Canary Islands, differ by having more narrower stipe, elongate and stout basidia (exceeding 35 μm) [48]. L. fuscobrunneum from the Canary Islands differ by having the undertint pileus, narrow hyphae in stipitipellis, and longer basidia [49]. L. solidipes from Hood National Forest of the United States has narrower hyphae of stipitipellis (3–5 μm) and narrower basidiospores (Q = 1.5–1.9) [50]. L. rhombisporum from China is characterized by rhombic or subrhombic basidiospores (14.5–17.0 × 10.0–11.5 μm) and larger basidia (36.5–46.0 × 10.0–11.3 μm) [51].
Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the new species is closely related to L. infumatum, L. moncalvoanum, and L. sykosporum. The common feature is that the context and lamellae turn black after injury. Lyophyllum infumatum from Italy is bigger in size of the basidiospore (9.2–12.2 × 5.0–7.4 μm), and the hyphae of pileipellis is 1.0–2.0 μm wide. Lyophyllum sykosporum from Japan and Switzerland is characterized by triangular basidiospores (5.5–8.5 × 4.5–6.5 μm), whitish and pruinose toward the stipe apex [52]. Lyophyllum moncalvoanum from New Zealand is characterized by olivaceous black pileus, clay to the olivaceous stipe, and globose basidiospores (5.0 ± 0.5 μm) [44].
Lyophyllum subalpinarum S.W. Wei, Q. Wang & Y. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 2e–h and Figure 4)
MycoBank number. MB846028
Etymology. “subalpinarum”, the area near alpine region.
Holotype. China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Lingzhi Prefecture, Lulang Town, Gongcuo Lake, 29°45′ N, 94°44′ E, alt. 3368 m, 20 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63447!, ITS = OP605492, 28S = OP605512).
Pileus 2.5–6.0 cm, hemispherical to convex with an inrolled margin when young, expanding to broadly convex or plane, shallowly depressed when mature, dry, glabrous, grayish-yellow (4C4), honey-yellow (4D6), brownish-orange (5C5), to yellowish-brown (5D5), darker at the center, brownish-red (8C8) to reddish-brown (8E8) when soaked in wet weather conditions. Context 0.3–0.7 cm, white to yellowish-white, dark when exposed or injured. Lamellae bluntly adnate to subdecurrent, moderately close, tapering toward the margin, white at first, becoming yellowish-white (4A2), orange-white (5A2) to grayish-orange (6B3) with age, usually discoloring to black at the edge when touched or injured, slight, with 1–3 unequal lamellulae between two entire lamellae. Stipe 2.5–7.5 cm long, 0.5–1.0 cm thick, equal or attenuate at the base, hollow, pliant, surface whitish-gray, dark color in the middle, obscurely longitudinally striate, not noticeably discoloring where bruised.
Basidiospores (6.7)6.9–8.7(9.4) × (4.0)4.3–5.1(5.6) μm, Lm = 7.91 ± 0.71, Wm = 4.75 ± 0.40, Q = (1.3)1.5–1.9(2.0), Qm = 1.67 ± 0.13, rounded-cylindrical to an irregular rhombus, mostly uninucleate, more rarely binucleate, smooth, thin-walled. Basidia (30.1)30.6–36.7(38.2) × (7.1)7.4–8.9(9.5) μm, Q = (3.5)3.8–4.7(5.0), Qm = 4.27 ± 0.41, four spored, rarely two-spored, siderophilous granules abundant, some with basal clamp connections. Pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia not observed. Pileipellis is a cutis of parallel to interwoven cylindrical hyphae, smooth, cylindrical, thin-walled, composed of 3.0–9.0 μm wide hyphae. Stipitipellis arranged regularly, parallel, cylindrical, composed of 3.0–7.5 μm wide hyphae. Clamp connections are present.
Known distribution. Known to occur in the Xizang Autonomous Region at high elevations (usually above alt. 3000 m) in Southwest China.
Habit and habitat. Single to scattered on soil in forests dominated by Spruce forest, from August to October.
Additional specimens examined. China. Xizang Autonomous Region: Lingzhi Prefecture, Bayi District, Katian Village, 29°44′ N, 94°10′ E, alt. 3057 m, 10 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63448), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63449); Lingzhi Prefecture, Bomi County, Guxiang Village, 29°54′ N, 95°26′ E, alt. 3230 m, 16 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63450), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63451); Lingzhi Prefecture, Lulang Town, Gongcuo Lake, 29°45′ N, 94°44′ E, alt. 3368 m, 20 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63452); Lingzhi Prefecture, Ladingga Village, 29°38′ N, 94°23′ E, alt. 3283 m, 21 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63453), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63454), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63455).
Notes: Morphologically, the paled-colored stipe and basidiospores size of L. subalpinarum is strongly reminiscent of L. deliberatum (Britzelm.) Kreisel, L. aemiliae Consiglio, L. pallidum Clémençon & A.H. Sm, L. canescentipes Clémençon & A.H. Sm, and L. fistulosum Clémençon & A.H. Sm. However, L. deliberatum has broader pileus (3.0–9.0 cm) and longer basidiospores (8.5–11.5 × 5–6.5 μm) [13]; and L. aemiliae differs by having white, pale gray to orange and Emarginate lamellae [13]. Lyophyllum pallidum from the United States differs by having smaller and wider basidiospores (6.2–7.4 × 4.5–5.2 μm, Q = 1.3–1.5) and pale watery-gray pileus. The main characteristics of the pileus of L. canescentipes are brownish-gray with the faintly striate margin, wider basidiospore (6.9–9.1 × 4.7–6.4 μm), and longer basidia (36–40 × 7–8 μm) [50]. The dark fuliginous pileus of L. fistulosum could be significantly different from this species [50].
Phylogenetically, the new species is closely related to L. semitale and L. maleolens. However, L. semitale from Korea and North Carolina (in the United States) is bigger in size regarding the basidiospore (3.0-8.0 cm); at the same time, darker-colored pileus and pale gray to brownish-gray lamellae also help to distinguish it from the new species [53,54]. Additionally, L. maleolens from Spain is characterized by a brown to dark fuscous-brown pileus, and the stipe is wider than that of the new species [48].
Lyophyllum subdecastes S.W. Wei, Q. Wang & Y. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 5a–d and Figure 6)
MycoBank number. MB846030
Etymology. “sub” means “near”, named because it is similar to L. decastes.
Holotype. China, Gansu Province, Zhangye City, Kangle grassland, 38°47′ N, 99°47′ E, alt. 2793 m, 08 August 2019, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63467!, ITS = OP605489, 28S = OP605509).
Plieus 2.5–5.5 cm wide, hemispherical to convex when young, broadly convex with an inrolled margin, elastic-cartilaginous, variable in shape; according to growth conditions, flatter when mature, without umbo, dry, glabrous, and sometimes margin wary, yellowish-brown (5E8), brown (6E6), grayish-red (8B5), dark at center, paler toward the margin, orange-white (5A2) at the margin of some young pileus. Significant deepening to reddish-brown (9E8) or brownish-red (10D8) when soaked in wet weather conditions. Context 0.4–1.3 cm thick, white to pale-white, fleshy, unchanging when exposed or injured, white in exsiccate. Lamellae close, adnate to subdecurrent, white at first, becoming yellowish-white (4A2) with age. Stipe 2.7–6.6 cm long, 0.5–1.5 cm thick, cylindrical to clavate, fibrillose-striate, base often enlarged when young, and usually equal over time, white at first, orange-white (6A2), with reddish-gray (7B2) to grayish-red (8C3) when mature, discoloring slightly when touched or damaged, fleshy and solid inside. Taste mild. Odor indistinctive.
Basidiospores (3.7) 3.9–5.0(5.3) × (3.6)3.7–5.0(5.2) μm, Lm = 4.47 ± 0.49, Wm = 4.25 ± 0.46, Q = 1.0–1,1, Qm = 1.05 ± 0.03, globular or subglobular, smooth, with a single, central oil-drop, nonamyloid in Melzer’s reagent. Basidia mainly four spored, rarely two spored, (31.8)36.7–50.6(53.5) × (8.0)8.4–10.9(11.1) μm, Q = (3.5)3.7–5.5(6.1), Qm = 4.51 ± 0.57, clavated, thin-walled, sterigmata 2.3–4.8 μm, siderophilous granules abundant. Pleurocystidia scattered, 21.63–47.57 × 5.23–11.19 μm, fusoid-ventricose to broadly fusoid-ventricose, with subacute apex or long beak, thin-walled. Cheilocystidia not observed. Pileipellis is a cutis of parallel to interwoven cylindrical hyphae, smooth, cylindrical, thin-walled, composed of 4.0–8.0 μm wide hyphae. Stipitipellis a cutis of parallel, regular, clamped, smooth, cylindrical, composed of 3.0–7.0 μm wide hyphae. Clamp connections are present.
Known distribution: Known to occur in the subalpine regions at high elevations (usually above alt. 2500m) in the Qilian Mountain, Gansu Province of Northwest China.
Habit and habitat: Gregarious on the soil in the coniferous forest dominated by Qinghai spruce, from August to October.
Additional specimens examined: China. Gansu Province: Zhangye City, Si Dalong tree farm, 37°38′ N, 102°38′ E, alt. 3040 m, 23 August 2018, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63468); the same location, in coniferous forest, mainly dragon spruce, 3017 m, 13 August 2019, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63478), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63479); the same location, in coniferous forest, mainly dragon spruce, 2998 m, 28 September 2018, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63469); Xiama tree farm, 37°38′ N, 103°9′ E, alt. 2698 m, 21 July 2019, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63470); Kangle grassland, 38°47′ N, 99°47′ E, alt. 2793 m, 08 August 2019, Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63471), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63472), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63473), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63474), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63475), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63476), Shu-Wei Wei & Bo-Yu Lu (HMJAU63477).
Notes: The new species can be identified by molecular-phylogenetic, morphological, and ecological characteristics. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), this species forms an independent clade within the L. decastes complex and differs from the East Asian and European clade of L. decastes and all other clades. In the field (Figure 5a–d), this taxon can be recognized by its yellowish-brown to brown pileus; lamellae close, adnate to subdecurrent; context and stipe fleshy and solid inside. It has a high-yielding production from August to October every year. Ecologically, it is distributed in high-altitude areas in Northwest China, usually over or around an elevation of 3000 m. Its subalpine distribution in Asia helps distinguish it from similar taxa from Europe and the United States.
Following the morphological analyses, L. subdecastes should be placed in L. decastes complex [55,56]; L. decastes, L. shimeji, and L. loricatum are similar to L. subdecastes in their appearance. However, the specimens found in Poland of L. decastes differ from L. subdecastes in their broader pileus, slightly longer stipe, lower altitude of distribution areas, and slightly larger basidiospores 5.0–7.0 μm [52,57]. L. shimeji differs from L. subdecastes with a slightly broad pileus, robust stipes, and an inflated base [43,58]. The differences between the new species and L. loricatum are that the latter has a reddish-brown to chestnut-brown pileus, which easily removes the pileus epiderm [15,59], and the basidia of specimens in Switzerland are smaller (28.0–32.0 × 7.0–8.0 μm) [52]. The results of phylogenetic analyses suggest that L. subdecastes is closely related with L. decastes, L. fumosum, and L. shimeji, which is consistent with the morphological study.
Ossicaulis sichuanensis S.W. Wei, Q. Wang & Y. Li, sp. nov. (Figure 5e–h and Figure 7)
MycoBank number. MB846031
Etymology. “sichuanensis”, refers to Sichuan Province, China, the holotype locality.
Holotype: China, Sichuan Province: Ganzi Prefecture, Jiulong County, Wuxuhai, 29°3′ N, 101°24′ E, alt. 3207 m, 26 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63480!).
Pileus 4.0–6.0 cm wide, shell-shaped to semicircular, applanation to slightly depressed at the center; margin involute or incurved when young, becoming wavy with age, sometimes lobed when mature, surface snow white to chalky (1A1, 2A1, 3A1, 4A1) in immature stages, yellowish-white to orange-white when old (3A2, 4A2, 5A2), cespitose, small to medium-sized, velutinous to tomentous; context 0.4–0.8 cm thick in the center, whiteish to cream-white, progressively thinning toward the margin, hygrophanous and opaque, unchanging in color when bruised. Lamellae free, somewhat crowded, narrow (0.2 cm high), thin, with one–three unequal lamellae between two entire lamellae, white to whiteish (1A1, 2A1, 3A1, 4A1). Stipe 2.6–3.5 cm long, 0.8–1.2 cm thick, central to nearly central when young, eccentric to lateral with age, subcylindrical to cylindrical, slightly wider upwards, surface snow white to whiteish (1A1, 2A1, 3A1, 4A1), finely pubescent, hygrophanous, unchanging when exposed. Odor and smell faint, taste not recorded.
Basidiospores (4.0)4.5–5.5 (6.0) × 2.5–3.0(3.5) μm, Lm = 5.11 ± 0.54, Wm = 2.86 ± 0.28, Q = (1.5)1.6–1.8(2.0), Qm = 1.73 ± 0.26, smooth, obtusely amygdaloid, thin-walled, hyaline. Basidia (15.0)16.5–20.0(22.5) × (4.0)4.5–5.0(6.0) μm, Q = (3.0)3.5–5.6(5.7), Qm = 4.21 ± 0.72, thin-walled, narrow clavate, 4-spored, colorless to hyaline in KOH. Basidiolae 16.0–20.0 × 4.0–5.0 μm, narrowly clavate. Cheilocystidia 12.0–23.0 × 3.0–6.5 μm, thin-walled, flexuous to irregular, cylindrical or subcylindrical, narrowly clavate, hyaline to colorless, rarely diverticulate outgrowths. Pleurocystidia 12.9–27.4 × 2.6–6.0 μm, similar to cheilocystidia in shape. Lamellar trama regular and interweave, 3.0–8.0 μm broad. Pileipellis is a cutis parallel to slightly interwoven cylindrical hyphae, composed of 3.0–6.0 μm wide, thin-walled, hyaline to colorless, terminal cells 11.0–25.0 × 3.5–6.0 μm, narrowly calvate or subcylindrical. Stipitipellis an interwoven, composed of 2.0–5.5 μm wide hyphae, hyaline to colorless in KOH, thin-walled hyphae, terminal cell 16.0–33.0 × 3.0–8.0 μm, cylindrical, narrowly clavate or irregular. Clamp connections are present.
Known distribution: Known to occur in the subalpine regions at high elevations (usually above alt. 3500 m) in Sichuan Province of Southwest China.
Habit and habitat: Cespitose, on living tree trunk dominated by Rhododendron spp., from August to October.
Additional specimens examined: China. Sichuan Province: Ganzi Prefecture, Jiulong County, Wuxuhai, 29°3′ N, 101°24′ E, alt. 3207 m, 26 August 2020, Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63481), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63482), Shu-Wei Wei (HMJAU63483).
Notes: Amongst the known species within Ossicaulis with snow white to chalky pileus and similar lamellae spacing, O. salomii, O. lachnopus, O. lignatilis, and O. yunnanensis are close to the new species. However, O. salomii, which is from Spain, can be distinguished by its smaller, caramel pileus, habitat in the dune zone next to the sea, and narrow stipe [45]; O. lachnopus and O. lignatilis from Europe differ by having smaller Basidia (12.0–15.0 × 3.5–4.5 μm), and the gill attachment of O. lachnopus is significantly different from that of O. sichuanensis. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that O. lachnopus, O. lignatilis, and O. yunnanensis have close affinities with O. sichuanensis. Consistent with the morphological study.

4. Discussion

To date, only 14 species of Lyophyllum have been previously reported in China, and most of them were collected from the temperate continental and plateau mountainous climate areas. In this study, four new species, L. atrofuscum, L. subalpinarum, L. subdecastes, and O. sichuanensis, are described from temperate and boreal China, based on morphological studies and phylogenetic analyses.
According to Bellanger et al., species of Lyophyllum are mostly distributed in north temperate regions [3]. In the molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the dataset combining ITS and nLSU, Lyophyllum and other members of Lyophyllaceae appear to be as a polyphyletic group, which is consistent with previous studies. Hofstetter et al. found that ancestral states of Lyophyllaceae s. str. and s.l. were unequivocally reconstructed as saprotrophic, while parasitism, ectomycorrhiza, and insect association appear to be derived states in the evolution of Lyophyllaceae [1]. The new species described in this study occupy independent lineages in Lyophyllaceae. Lyophyllum Clade Ⅰ (sect. Difformia) are very similar in morphology. There is also a large amount of interspecific similarity in basidiocarp form, coloration, size, and lamellae attachment. Five taxa recognized in the L. decastes complex in Japan and Europe were confirmed by previous research [60,61]. In this study, L. subdecastes and L. decastes were grouped in a single sister-clade with strong support (1/100%), and they can be distinguished by morphology and phylogeny. Lyophyllum subdecastes grows on soil under the subalpine coniferous forests dominated by Picea crassifolia, whereas L. decastes differs from L. subdecastes in a broader pileus, longer stipe, and a main distribution in lower altitude areas [52]. Moncalvo et al. found that the mycelia cultural characters of L. atratum were closer to Clade Ⅰ (sect. Difformia) [62]. In this study, we failed to obtain the specimens and corresponding morphological description of Clade Ⅱ (L. ambustum (Fr.) Singer, L. anthracophilum (Lasch) M. Lange & Sivertsen, and L. atratum (Fr.) Singer) and could not confirm the existence of this clade in China. The taxonomic treatments of Clade Ⅱ from China should be performed based on additional detailed investigations in later studies.
For a long time, only O. lignatilis was distinguished. Ossicaulis lachnopus was recognized several years after publishing its taxonomic treatment and invalid combination. In this study, O. sichuanensis clusters as a sister clade of O. lachnopus, O. lignatilis, and O. yunnanensis with strong support and can be easily distinguished by its morphology. The absence of cystidia and the unique ecology of O. salomii differs from other Ossicaulis species [45]. In the present paper, four new species of lyophylloid mushrooms are described from temperate and boreal China, among them Lyophyllum atrofuscum, L. subalpinarum, and Ossicaulis sichuanensis are from Southwest China, which demonstrates that Southwest China is very rich in the species diversity of fungi, as shown in previous studies [63,64,65,66,67]. A key to the 17 Lyophyllum species reported from China and the known species of Ossicaulis are provided as follows:
Key to species of Lyophyllum in China
1. Lamellae black when bruised2
1’. Lamellae no staining when bruised13
2. Basidiocarps small, pileus usually less than 6 cm, stipe less than 5 cm, and width narrower than 1.2 cm3
2’. Basidiocarps medium to large, pileus usually more than 6 cm, stipe more than 5 cm long, and width exceeding 1.2 cm7
3. Lamellae dark, grayish-blackL. trigonosporum
3’. Lamellae white, gray to light brown4
4. Pileus usually less than 3 cm5
4’. Pileus usually broader than 3 cm6
5. Width of the stipe is narrower than 0.3 cmL. pusillum
5’. Width of the stipe is usually 0.3–1.2 cmL. pulvis-horrei
6. Pileipellis hyphae width of more than 4 μm L. subalpinarum
6’. Pileipellis hyphae width less than or equal to 4 μmL. semitale
7. Basidiospores usually longer than 14 μmL. rhombisporum
7’. Basidiospores shorter than 14 µm8
8. Basidiospores globosae L. immundum
8’. Basidiospores not globosae9
9. Basidiospores triangular10
9’. Basidiospores rhombic or subrhombic11
10. Basidiospores with a hump located in the middle of the abaxial side, not thicker than the main body of the basidiospore and not higher than the length of the BasidiosporeL. sykosporum
10’. Basidiospores with a broad abaxial, thickening and making it widest near the apexL. transforme
11. Q value less than or equal to 1.5L. atrofuscum
11’. Q value higher than 1.512
12. Hymenophoral trama are regular, hyphae of the mediostratum are narrow than 15 μmL. infumatum
12’. Hymenophoral trama are regular, hyphae of the mediostratum exceed 15 μm, up to 20 μmL. macrosporum
13. Basidiocarps large, up to exceeding 10 cm14
13’. Basidiocarps are small to medium, less than 10 cm15
14. Pileus reddish-brown to chestnut-brown, the width of stipe usually less than 1.5 cmL. loricatum
14’. Pileus grayish-brown to grayish-yellow, the width of the stipe usually exceeds more than 1.5cm L. shimeji
15. Basidiospores diam usually less than 5.5 μmL. subdecastes
15’. Basidiospores diam usually more than 5.5 μm16
16. Basidia usually less than 30 μmL. fumosum
16’. Basidia usually longer than 30 μmL. decastes
Key to worldwide species of Ossicaulis
1. Basidiospores usually shorter than 4 µm2
1’. Basidiospores usually longer than 4 μm3
2. Pileus white, chalky to orange tinged, without grayish tinge, on living tree trunks in alpine beltO. yunnanensis
2’. Pileus gray or beige-gray, on dying or decaying woodsO. lachnopus
3. Width of the stipe is narrower than 2.0 cmO. salomii
3’. Width of stipe is usually more than 2.0 cm4
4. Basidia usually less than 15 μmO. lignatilis
4’. Basidia usually longer than 15 μmO. sichuanensis

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.W. and Y.L.; methodology, Q.W. and Y.L.; software, S.-W.W. and Y.W.; investigation, S.-W.W. and B.-Y.L.; resources, B.-Y.L., W.-J.D. and Y.W.; data curation, Q.W. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-W.W.; writing—review and editing, Q.W. and Y.L.; visualization, S.-W.W.; supervision, Q.W. and Y.L.; project administration, Q.W. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, Q.W. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1600401); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31770011); the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD1001001); the Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program (20220402051GH); and the biodiversity investigation, observation, and assessment program (2019–2023) of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data relevant to this research can be found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/, https://www.mycobank.org/, and https://www.treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html, accessed on 10 October 2022.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Hai-Sheng Yuan (Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) and Bao Qi (Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, China) for their guidance on the thesis writing. Thanks to Meng-Le Xie (Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, China) and Juan Zhong (Hunan Normal University, China) for their contributions to collecting samples. Special thanks to Xiao-Zhuo Zhang (Northeast Normal University, China) for help in the data processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hofstetter, V.; Redhead, S.A.; Kauff, F.; Moncalvo, J.M.; Matheny, P.B.; Vilgalys, R. Taxonomic Revision and Examination of Ecological Transitions of the Lyophyllaceae (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) Based on a Multigene Phylogeny. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2014, 35, 399–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alvarado, P.; Moreau, P.A.; Dima, B.; Vizzini, A.; Consiglio, G. Pseudoclitocybaceae fam. nov.(Agaricales, Tricholomatineae), a new arrangement at family, genus and species level. Fungal Divers. 2018, 90, 109–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bellanger, J.M.; Moreau, P.A.; Corriol, G.; Bidaud, A.; Chalange, R.; Dudova, Z.; Richard, F. Plunging hands into the mushroom jar: A phylogenetic framework for Lyophyllaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Genetica 2015, 143, 169–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lennart, J.J.; Marry, C.A.; Thomas, L.; Ole, S.P.; Victor, R.M.; Thomas, W.K.; Dirk, S.; Duur, K.A.; Timothy, J.B. Four new genera and six new species of lyophylloid agarics (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from three different continents. Mycol. Prog. 2022, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vizzini, A.; Consiglio, G.; Setti, L.; Ercole, E. Calocybella, a new genus for Rugosomyces pudicus (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae) and emendation of the genus Gerhardtia. IMA Fungus 2015, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z.L.; Wu, G.; Li, Y.C.; Wang, X.H.; Cai, Q. Common Edible and Poisonous Mushrooms of Southwestern China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, F.; Xu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Fu, J. Lyophyllum decastes fruiting body polysaccharide alleviates acute liver injury by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 2057–2067. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Wu, F.; Zhou, L.W.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Li, T.H.; Dai, Y.C. Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Divers. 2019, 98, 1–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Z.Y.; Han, J.J.; Mi, P.C.; Chen, B.S.; Bao, L.; Xi, Y.L.; Wang, Z.D.; Xie, L.P.; Guo, C.B.; Wei, S.L. Chemical constituents from fruiting bodies of Lyophyllum decastes. Mycosystema 2020, 39, 1774–1782. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, J.H.; Yang, B.; Ren, J.Y.; Jin, W.S.; Sun, S.J.; Hu, K.H. Effects of hot air drying temperature on drying characteristics and volatile flavor compounds for Lyophyllum decastes. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 3304–3319. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu, J.; Yu, X.; Suwannarach, N.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y. Additions to Lyophyllaceae s.l. from China. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joshi, M.; Bhargava, P.; Bhatt, M.; Kadri, S.; Shri, M.; Joshi, C.G. Lyophyllaceae. In Mushrooms of Gujarat; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vesterholt, J. Funga Nordica, Agaricoid, Boletoid, Cyphelloid and Gasteroid Genera; Nordsvamp: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012; p. 9811021. [Google Scholar]
  14. He, M.Q.; Zhao, R.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Begerow, D.; Kemler, M.; Yurkov, A.; McKenzie, E.H.; Raspé, O.; Kakishima, M.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S. Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 105–367. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kühner, R. Utilisation du carmin acétique dans la classification des agarics leucosporés. Publ. De La Société Linnéenne De Lyon 1938, 7, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singer, R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy, 4th ed.; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1986; p. 981. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sundberg, H. Phylogeny of Lyophyllum Section Difformia. Does hon-shimeji (L. shimeji) Occur in Sweden? Master’s Thesis, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sesli, E.; Vizzini, A.; Contu, M. Lyophyllum turcicum (Agaricomycetes: Lyophyllaceae), a new species from Turkey. Turk. J. Bot. 2015, 39, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Redhead, S.A.; Hofstetter, V.; Clémençon, H.; Moncalvo, J.M.; Vilgalys, R.J. (1742) Proposal to conserve the name Lyophyllum with a conserved type (Basidiomycota). Taxon 2006, 55, 1034–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Redhead, S.A. A reappraisal of agaric genera associated with brown rots of woods. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 26, 349–389. [Google Scholar]
  21. Holec, J.; Kolařík, M. Ossicaulis lachnopus (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae), a species similar to O. lignatilis, is verified by morphological and molecular methods. Mycol. Prog. 2013, 12, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, L.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Hyde, K.D.; Mortimer, P.E. A survey of Termitomyces (Lyophyllaceae, Agaricales), including a new species, from a subtropical forest in Xishuangbanna, China. Mycobiology 2019, 47, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Li, T.; Li, T.H.; Wang, C.Q.; Deng, W.Q.; Song, B. Gerhardtia sinensis (Agaricales, Lyophyllaceae), a new species and a newly recorded genus for China. Phytotaxa 2017, 332, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, Q.; LvLi, Y.; Kost, G.; Yang, Z.L. Tricholyophyllum brunneum gen. et. sp. nov. with bacilliform basidiospores in the family Lyophyllaceae. Mycosystema 2020, 39, 1728–1740. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feng, Y.; Tang, X.; Yu, J.F.; Yang, Z.F.; Ma, M.; Guo, X. Recent Research Progress of Lyophyllum. Vegetables 2019, 8, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, X.; Zhang, S.Y.; Li, Y. Biological Characteristics of Lyophyllum fumosum. Edible Fungi China 2010, 29, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Mo, M.; Yang, L.; Mi, F.; Cao, Y.; Liu, C.L.; Tang, X.Z.; Wang, P.F.; Xu, J.P. Exploring the species diversity of edible mushrooms in Yunnan, Southwestern China, by DNA barcoding. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, X.Q.; Zhou, D.Q.; Zhang, X.L. Taxonomic Study on the Genus Lyophyllum in Sustainable Environment Engineering. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 340, 975–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, S.D.; Huang, H.Y.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, N.K.; Tang, L.P. Ossicaulis yunnanensis sp. nov.(Lyophyllaceae, Agaricales) from southwestern China. Mycoscience 2018, 59, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.; Li, T.H.; Yang, Z.L.; Bau, T.; Dai, Y.C. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources; Central Chinese Farmer: Zhengzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Komerup, A.; Wanscher, J. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Pavey, D., Ed.; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1978; pp. 1–252. [Google Scholar]
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A.; Chen, W.; Bolchacova, E.; Voigt, K.; Crous, P.W. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6241–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hall, T.A. Bioedit: A user–friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.; Von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hofstetter, V.; Clémençon, H.; Vilgalys, R.; Moncalvo, J.M. Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 1043–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sesli, E.; Vizzini, A.; Ercole, E.; Contu, M. Clitolyophyllum akcaabatense gen. nov., sp. nov.(Agaricales, Tricholomatineae); a new fan-shaped clitocyboid agaric from Turkey. Botany 2016, 94, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Larsson, E.; Sundberg, H. Lyophyllum shimeji, a species associated with lichen pine forest in northern Fennoscandia. Mycoscience 2011, 52, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cooper, J. New species and combinations of some New Zealand agarics belonging to Clitopilus, Lyophyllum, Gerhardtia, Clitocybe, Hydnangium, Mycena, Rhodocollybia and Gerronema. Mycosphere 2014, 5, 263–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Sharma, R.; Mughini, G.; Noordeloos, M.E.; Santini, A.; Shouche, Y.S.; Bezerra, J.D.; Dima, B. Fungal Planet description sheets: 868–950. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2019, 42, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alvarado, P.; Moreno, G.; Vizzini, A.; Consiglio, G.; Manjon, J.L.; Setti, L. Atractosporocybe, Leucocybe and Rhizocybe: Three new clitocyboid genera in the Tricholomatoid clade (Agaricales) with notes on Clitocybe and Lepista. Mycologia 2015, 107, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Musumeci, E.; Contu, M. Tephroderma (Agaricomycetidae, Tricholomatoid clade), un nuovo genere di Basidiomiceti lamellati dalla Francia. Bolletino AMER 2014, 91, 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dähncke, R.; Contu, M.; Vizzini, A. Some rare or critical taxa of the genus Lyophyllum s.l. Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes from La Palma Canary Islands, Spain. Osterr. Z. Für Pilzkd. 2009, 18, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  49. Dähncke, R.M.; Contu, M.; Vizzini, A. Two new species of Lyophyllum s.l. (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes) from La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain). Mycotaxon 2011, 111, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Clémençon, H.; Smith, A. New species of Lyophyllum (Agaricales) from North America and a key to the known staining species. Mycotaxon 1983, 18, 379–437. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, X.Q.; Zhou, D.Q.; Zhao, Y.C.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, L.; Li, S.H. Lyophyllum rhombisporum sp. nov. from China. Mycotaxon 2013, 123, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Breitenbach, J. Fungi of Switzerland. Volume 3, Boletes and Agarics 1; Verlag Mycologia: Luzern, Switzerland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hesler, L.R. Lyophyllum Notebook 1; University of Tennessee: Knoxville, TN, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim, Y.S.; Park, Y.H.; Shin, K.C. Notes on Korean Agaricales (II). Korean J. Mycol. 1978, 6, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  55. Arana-Gabriel, Y.; Burrola-Aguilar, C.; Garibay-Orijel, R.; Matías-Ferrer, N.; Franco-Maass, S.; Mata, G. Genetic characterization, evaluation of growth and production of biomass of strains from wild edible mushrooms of Lyophyllum of Central Mexico. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Jin, X.; Chen, Z.; Xiong, C.; Li, P.; Zhao, J.; Huang, W. Characterization and comparison of the mitochondrial genomes from two Lyophyllum fungal species and insights into phylogeny of Agaricomycetes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bocian, M. Nowe stanowisko kępkowca jasnobrązowego Lyophyllum decastes (Fr.) Singer na Pomorzu Zachodnim. Przegląd Przyr. 2017, 28, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ohta, A. Some cultural characteristics of mycelia of a mycorrhizal fungus, Lyophyllum shimeji. Mycoscience 1994, 35, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gillet, C.C. Les Hyménomycètes: Ou, Description de Tous Les Champignons (Fungi) qui Croissent en France, Avec l’indication de Leurs Propriétés Utiles ou Vénéneuses; C. Thomas: Alençon, France, 1874; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  60. Moncalvo, J.M.; Clémençon, H. A comparative study of fruit body morphology and culture characters in the Lyophyllum decastes complex (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes) from Japan and Europe. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 33, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  61. Moncalvo, J.M.; Clémençon, H. Enzymic studies as an aid to the taxonomy of the Lyophyllum decastes complex. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moncalvo, J.M.; Rehner, S.A.; Vilgalys, R. Systematics of Lyophyllum section Difformia based on evidence from culture studies and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 1993, 85, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Deng, W.Y.; Li, G.W.; Ge, Z.W.; Zhang, P. Two new species of Clavariadelphus from alpine temperate forests of southwestern China. Mycosystema 2020, 39, 1684–1693. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Z.L.; Ye, S.Y.; Rivoire, B.; Dai, Y.C. Exidia yadongensis, a new edible species from East Asia. Mycosystema 2020, 39, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu, F.; Wang, X.H.; Qin, W.Q.; Hao, Y.J.; Guo., T.; Zhang, P.; Chen, Z.H. Five new species and one new record of Lactarius (Russulaceae, Russulales) from tropical and subtropical regions of China. Mycosystema 2022, 41, 1234–1253. [Google Scholar]
  66. Dai, Y.C.; Yang, Z.L.; Cui, B.K.; Wu, G.; Yuan, H.S. Diversity and systematics of the important macrofungi in Chinese forests. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 770–805. [Google Scholar]
  67. Guan, Q.X.; Zhao, C.L. Two new corticioid species, Hyphoderma sinense and H. floccosum (Hyphodermataceae, Polyporales), from southern China. Mycosystema 2021, 40, 447–461. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree performed by ML analysis based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The new species are indicated in red.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree performed by ML analysis based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The new species are indicated in red.
Jof 09 00077 g001
Figure 2. Basidiomata of Lyophyllum. (ad) L. atrofuscum, (a,b) HMJAU63461; (c,d) HMJAU63456! holotype. (eh) L. subalpinarum, (e,f) HMJAU63447! holotype; (g,h) HMJAU63453. Scale bars: (a,d) 4 cm; (b) 5 cm; (c) 3 cm; (eg) 2 cm; (h) 3 cm.
Figure 2. Basidiomata of Lyophyllum. (ad) L. atrofuscum, (a,b) HMJAU63461; (c,d) HMJAU63456! holotype. (eh) L. subalpinarum, (e,f) HMJAU63447! holotype; (g,h) HMJAU63453. Scale bars: (a,d) 4 cm; (b) 5 cm; (c) 3 cm; (eg) 2 cm; (h) 3 cm.
Jof 09 00077 g002
Figure 3. Microscopic features of L. atrofuscum (HMJAU63460). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pleurocystidia; (d) Stipitipellis; (e) Pileipellis. Scale bars: (ad) = 10 μm; (e) = 15 μm.
Figure 3. Microscopic features of L. atrofuscum (HMJAU63460). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pleurocystidia; (d) Stipitipellis; (e) Pileipellis. Scale bars: (ad) = 10 μm; (e) = 15 μm.
Jof 09 00077 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic features of L. subalpinarum (HMJAU63451). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pileipellis; (d). Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (a,b) = 10 μm; (c,d) = 20 μm.
Figure 4. Microscopic features of L. subalpinarum (HMJAU63451). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pileipellis; (d). Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (a,b) = 10 μm; (c,d) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 00077 g004
Figure 5. Basidiomata of Lyophyllum. (ad) L. subdecastes, (a,b) HMJAU63467! holotype; (c,d) HMJAU63470. Basidiomata of Ossicaulis. (eh) O. sichuanensis, (eg) HMJAU63480! holotype; (h) HMJAU63483. Scale bar: (ad) 2 cm; (e,f) 1.6 cm; (g) 1.5 cm; (h) 2 cm.
Figure 5. Basidiomata of Lyophyllum. (ad) L. subdecastes, (a,b) HMJAU63467! holotype; (c,d) HMJAU63470. Basidiomata of Ossicaulis. (eh) O. sichuanensis, (eg) HMJAU63480! holotype; (h) HMJAU63483. Scale bar: (ad) 2 cm; (e,f) 1.6 cm; (g) 1.5 cm; (h) 2 cm.
Jof 09 00077 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic features of L. subdecastes (HMJAU63468). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pleurocystidia; (d) Pileipellis; (e) Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (a) = 5 μm; (be) = 10 μm.
Figure 6. Microscopic features of L. subdecastes (HMJAU63468). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Pleurocystidia; (d) Pileipellis; (e) Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (a) = 5 μm; (be) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00077 g006
Figure 7. Microscopic features of O. sichuanensis (HMJAU63480!, holotype). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Cheilocystidia; (d) Pleurocystidia; (e) Pileipellis; (f) Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (ae) = 5 μm; (f) = 10 μm.
Figure 7. Microscopic features of O. sichuanensis (HMJAU63480!, holotype). (a) Basidiospores; (b) Basidia; (c) Cheilocystidia; (d) Pleurocystidia; (e) Pileipellis; (f) Stipitipellis. Scale bars: (ae) = 5 μm; (f) = 10 μm.
Jof 09 00077 g007
Table 1. Taxa information and GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Taxa information and GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in this study.
TaxaVoucher IDGenBank Accession No.References
ITSnLSU
Asterophora lycoperdoidesCBS170.86AF357037AF223190[1]
A. parasiticaCBS683.82AF357038AF223191[1]
Calocybe carneaCBS552.50AF357028AF223178[1]
C. favreiIE-BSG-HC96cp4EF421102AF223184[1]
C. gangraenosaIE-BSG-HAe251.97AF357032AF223202[1]
C. ionidesIE-BSG-HC77/133AF357029AF223179[1]
C. naucoriaIE-BSG-HC80/103AF357030AF223180[1]
C. obscurissimaIE-BSG-HC79/181AF357031AF223181[1]
C. ochraceaIE-BSG-BSI94.cp1AF357033AF223185[41]
C. persicolorIE-BSG-HC80/99AF357026AF223176[1]
Clitolyophyllum akcaabatenseKATO Fungi 3184KT934393KT934394[42]
Entoloma undatumTB7144EF421108AF261315[1]
Gerhardtia sp.HC01/025EF421103EF421091[1]
Hypsizygus ulmariusDUKE-JM/HWEF421105AF042584[1]
Leucocybe candicansAFTOL-ID 541DQ202268AY645055[1]
L. connataDUKE-JM90cEF421104AF042590[1]
Lyophyllum ambustumCBS452.87AF357057AF223216[1]
L. ambustumCBS450.87AF357058AF223214[1]
L. anthracophilumIE-BSG-HC79/132AF357055AF223212[1]
L. atratumCBS709.87AF357053AF223210[1]
L. atrofuscumHMJAU63461OP605493OP605513this study
L. atrofuscumHMJAU63456OP605494OP605514this study
L. caerulescensGC05082201KP192628NA[3]
L. caerulescensIE-BSG-HC80/140AF357052AF223209[1]
L. cf. helvellaGC07101301KP192625NA[3]
L. cf. maas-geesteraniPAM06082615KP192553NA[3]
L. cf. pulvis-horreiGC10101701KP192665NA[3]
L. crassipodiumAB12-11-237KP192608NA[3]
L. decastesIE-BSG-JM87/16AF357059AF042583[1]
L. decastesBrunsson 19920924HM572544NA[43]
L. decastesAndersson 19901016HM572546NA[43]
L. decastesBengtsson 19910929HM572545NA[43]
L. decastesLAS 06-152HM572547NA[43]
L. decastesAase 19821031HM572543NA[43]
L. decastesSundberg 20091007aHM572548NA[43]
L. decastesSundberg 20091007bHM572549NA[43]
L. fumosumSJ 02-006HM572539NA[43]
L. fumosumLipovac 20090903HM572538NA[43]
L. fumosumSundberg 20090813HM572537NA[43]
L. infumatumAB04-11-497KP192584NA[3]
L. konradianumPAM06092203KP192569NA[3]
L. maleolensAB11-11-328KP192607NA[3]
L. maleolensGC08110109KP192624NA[3]
L. moncalvoanumPDD 72796KJ461890KJ461891[44]
L. moncalvoanumPDD 96328KJ461904KJ461905[44]
L. semitaleCBS 369.47AF357048AF223207[41]
L. semitaleIE-BSG-HC85/13AF357049AF042581[1]
L. shimejiDomeij090913HM572525NA[43]
L. shimejiSundberg 20090813aHM572524NA[43]
L. subalpinarumHMJAU63449OP605490OP605510this study
L. subalpinarumHMJAU63453OP605491OP605511this study
L. subalpinarumHMJAU63447OP605492OP605512this study
L. subdecastesHMJAU63470OP605488OP605508this study
L. subdecastesHMJAU63467OP605489OP605509this study
L. sykosporumIE-BSG-HCM3AF357051AF357073[41]
L. sykosporumIFO30978AF357050AF223208[1]
L. transformeGC08101108KP192653NA[3]
Myochromella boudieriIE-BSG-HC78UAF357046AF223206[41]
M. inolensIE-BSG-BSI96/84AF357047AF223204[1]
M. inolensCBS330.85AF357045AF223201[1]
Ossicaulis lachnopusPRM 899221HE649956NA[21]
O. lachnopusPRM 899181HE649955NA[21]
O. lignatilisPRM 897367HE649952NA[21]
O. lignatilisPRM 889177HE649953NA[21]
O. salomiiAB 14-04-02MK650044MK650043[45]
O. sichuanensisHMJAU63481OP605495OP605515this study
O. sichuanensisHMJAU63482OP605496OP605516this study
O. sichuanensisHMJAU63483OP605497OP605517this study
O. yunnanensisIJ152KY411962KY411960[29]
O. yunnanensisIH26KY411961KY411959[29]
Rhizocybe vermicularisAH44078KJ681032KJ681039[46]
Sagaranella gibberosaCBS328.50AF357041AF223197[1]
S. gibberosaCBS320.80/IFO 30977AF357042AF223198[41]
S. palusterCBS717.87AF357044AF223200[1]
S. tylicolorIE-BSG-BSI92/245AF357040AF223195[1]
S. tylicolorIE-BSG-Sag5-27/11AF357039AF223194[41]
S. palusterCBS714.87AF357043AF223199[41]
Tephrocybella griseonigrescensTO HG 21112014KR105775KR476785[47]
Tephroderma fuscopallensLUG18989KJ701327KJ701333[47]
T. fuscopallensEM4789-12KJ701326KJ701332[47]
Termitomyces heimiiDUKE-JMleg.MUIDs.n.AF357022AF042586[41]
T. microcarpusDUKE-PRU3900AF357023AF042578[1]
T. radicatusCBS204.47AF357025AF223203[1]
T. sp.IE-BSG-BSI sp.1AF357024AF223174[1]
Tricholomella constrictaIE-BSG-HC84/75AF357036AF223188[1]
Tricholyophyllum brunneumHKAS107494MT705717MT734655[24]
Notes: Newly generated sequences in this study are in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, S.-W.; Lu, B.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Dou, W.-J.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y. Morphology and Phylogeny of Lyophylloid Mushrooms in China with Description of Four New Species. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010077

AMA Style

Wei S-W, Lu B-Y, Wang Y, Dou W-J, Wang Q, Li Y. Morphology and Phylogeny of Lyophylloid Mushrooms in China with Description of Four New Species. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Shu-Wei, Bo-Yu Lu, Yang Wang, Wen-Jun Dou, Qi Wang, and Yu Li. 2023. "Morphology and Phylogeny of Lyophylloid Mushrooms in China with Description of Four New Species" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop