Next Article in Journal
Progress and Challenges in Elucidating the Functional Role of Effectors in the Soybean-Phytophthora sojae Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Mebendazole Inhibits Histoplasma capsulatum In Vitro Growth and Decreases Mitochondrion and Cytoskeleton Protein Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Strategies for Controlling the Sporulation in Fusarium spp.
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Comparative Evaluation of the Fujifilm Wako β-Glucan Assay and Fungitell Assay for Diagnosing Invasive Fungal Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-albicans Candida Species: Immune Response, Evasion Mechanisms, and New Plant-Derived Alternative Therapies

by
Manuela Gómez-Gaviria
,
Uriel Ramírez-Sotelo
and
Héctor M. Mora-Montes
*
Departamento de Biología, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, col. Noria Alta, C.P., Guanajuato 36050, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010011
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 18 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatments of Invasive Fungal Diseases)

Abstract

:
Fungal infections caused by Candida species have become a constant threat to public health, especially for immunocompromised patients, who are considered susceptible to this type of opportunistic infections. Candida albicans is known as the most common etiological agent of candidiasis; however, other species, such as Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Nakaseomyces glabrata (previously known as Candida glabrata), Candida auris, Candida guilliermondii, and Pichia kudriavzevii (previously named as Candida krusei), have also gained great importance in recent years. The increasing frequency of the isolation of this non-albicans Candida species is associated with different factors, such as constant exposure to antifungal drugs, the use of catheters in hospitalized patients, cancer, age, and geographic distribution. The main concerns for the control of these pathogens include their ability to evade the mechanisms of action of different drugs, thus developing resistance to antifungal drugs, and it has also been shown that some of these species also manage to evade the host’s immunity. These biological traits make candidiasis treatment a challenging task. In this review manuscript, a detailed update of the recent literature on the six most relevant non-albicans Candida species is provided, focusing on the immune response, evasion mechanisms, and new plant-derived compounds with antifungal properties.

1. Introduction

In the last 50 years, we have experienced great advances in healthcare services, which have improved life quality and expectancy. However, this has been accompanied by the increased risk to develop opportunistic infections, such as systemic candidiasis, one of the leading causes of infection-related morbidity and mortality [1]. There are more than 18 different Candida species that cause infections in humans, but at least six of these are associated with more than 95% of invasive diseases [2]. Currently, a major part of candidiasis is still owing to Candida albicans (63–70%) [3]; however, other Candida species, such as Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Pichia kudriavzevii, Nakaseomyces glabrata, and Candida auris, among others, are collectively as important as C. albicans in the clinical setting and are known as non-albicans Candida species (NAC). Usually, these are found in the environment, skin, or as mucosal colonizers in humans [2,3,4].
C. tropicalis is widely distributed in nature, being a common colonizer of the human skin, oral cavity, and digestive tract. This yeast is an important opportunistic pathogen capable of causing nosocomial infections and it is the second most frequently isolated species after C. albicans [5,6]. An important aspect that contributes to invasive candidiasis is drug resistance, and in recent years, this biological trait has increased among the C. tropicalis clinical isolates [6,7,8]. The main reason for C. tropicalis’ increased drug resistance is due to mutations of the ergosterol synthase encoding gene ERG11 and overexpression of the transcriptional regulator encoded by UPC2 (Figure 1) [6,8].
C. parapsilosis is often the second or third most frequently isolated Candida species in intensive care units (ICUs) since it is capable to form biofilms on central venous catheters and other medically indwelling devices, thus menacing patients who have undergone invasive medical interventions. In addition, C. parapsilosis-caused infections are a significant problem among neonates [9,10]. Even though these infections generally result in lower morbidity and mortality rates than those caused by C. albicans, diverse clinical isolates of this species have been reported to be less susceptible to echinocandins, and in some regions, resistance to azole treatment has also been noted, which complicates the choice of antifungal drug therapy [10,11,12]. The echinocandin resistance mechanism in C. parapsilosis differs from the phenotypic changes seen in other Candida species because this fungal species has a natural polymorphism in FKS1, which leads to reduced in vitro echinocandin susceptibility (Figure 1) [9,13]. The mechanism for azole resistance is like that described for C. tropicalis [6,8].
N. glabrata is responsible for nosocomial infections, particularly in adult wards, and is characterized by single biofilm formation, which increases its pathogenesis [2,14,15]. In the United States, approximately one-third of candidiasis cases are caused by N. glabrata, causing hematogenous infections [16,17]. Like other NAC, drug-resistant strains of N. glabrata are of great concern, as they are being isolated with increasing frequency. For example, in some medical centers, up to 25% of N. glabrata isolates are resistant or moderately susceptible to echinocandins [17,18,19]. These data remark on the relevance of N. glabrata in the clinical setting. Antifungal drug resistance in this species is related to the over-expression of membrane transporters, point mutations in ERG11/CYP51, altered sterol import, and genome plasticity, with segmental rearrangements in the M and F chromosomes (Figure 1) [20].
On the other hand, P kudriavzevii is an important pathogen in cancer patients, causing both systemic and superficial infections [21]. This organism can cause bronchopneumonia, vasculitis, infections of the tonsils, arthritis, ulcers, and urinary tract, but it is a rare etiologic agent of vaginitis (it has only been isolated in 0.1% of cases) [21,22]. P. kudriavzevii has intrinsic resistance to fluconazole and variable resistance to other drugs used in its treatment, including voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, micafungin, 5-flucytosine, and amphotericin B [23,24,25]. Thus, this changing sensitivity to antifungal drugs makes this organism a potential threat to human health.
As known, Candida guilliermondii has become a relevant causative agent of candidiasis in recent years. According to a report by Chen et al., [26] the Meyerozyma guilliermondii complex is the second most common Candida species isolated from bloodstream infections in a Chinese hospital, and this is the first study that assessed the risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of candidemia caused by the M. guilliermondii complex in cancer patients who have undergone recent surgery. Similarly, this organism has been increasingly isolated in Japan, with a rise in frequency of detection of 14%-24% [27,28,29]. Strains with resistance to azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins have been reported [30]. The most common mechanisms of drug resistance in this species include increased activity of the efflux pump, alteration of the 14 α-demethylase, and point mutations in FKS1 (Figure 1) [30].
Just over a decade ago, in East Asia, the identification of a new species, C. auris, was reported, whose peculiarity was its resistance to fluconazole [31]. Currently, this species has been identified throughout the world, and its relevance relies on the fact that it is difficult to identify in the clinical laboratory, leading to erroneous diagnosis and failure in the treatments, a fact that favors the development of resistance acquisition to multiple drugs [32]. Similar to other Candida species, in C. auris the molecular mechanisms of resistance to azoles include the overexpression and mutations in the ERG11 gene (which codes for lanosterol demethylase), and alterations in the sterol synthesis pathway that involves the replacement of ergosterol by other sterols, among others (Figure 1) [32,33]. Mutations in this and other genes, such as FKS1, result in elevated minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges for echinocandins and have been linked to treatment failure (Figure 1) [32,33]. C. auris has been classified as a fungal pathogen of concern, which is often associated with nosocomial infections and is considered a threat to human health throughout the world due to its ability to spread efficiently from person to person and cause deadly diseases [34,35,36].
The establishment of Candida spp. as a causative agent of tissue and organ damage relies on both the virulence and determinant factors displayed by the pathogen and the host immune response triggered upon tissue invasion [37]. As mentioned, in recent years we have experienced an increment in the frequency of antifungal drug resistance in the different NAC species and C. albicans, which poses increased pressure among the scientific community to find new compounds with antifungal properties, with the potential to be used as alternatives to treat candidiasis. Since thorough review papers have been recently published about virulence factors in Candida spp. [38,39,40], it results pertinent to conduct an up-to-date literature revision on the interaction of the pathogen–immune cell, the mechanisms to evade host defenses, and the new prophylactic strategies for the treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by NAC species.

2. Pathogen–Host Interaction in Different NAC Species

The control of infections caused by the different NAC species, and other fungi, is based on the correct activation of innate and adaptive immune responses [10]. The first step during this interaction is the recognition of the fungal cell wall components. This is a key structure that fulfills very specific functions within the cell, it is responsible for communication with the extracellular environment, and provides strength and protection against host immunity [41,42]. The cell wall has pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) located mostly on the cell surface of immune cells [43]. The cell wall PAMPs of the different NAC species are chitin, β-1,3-glucans, β-1, 6-glucans, and N-linked and O-linked mannans [42,43].
The most studied fungus–host interaction is that of C. albicans, and it is thought that this interaction may be similar in NAC species [44]. Recently, several works have reported the immune recognition of different Candida species of medical importance [42,45,46]. Immune cells, such as neutrophils and murine phagocytic cells, can distinguish between different Candida species. In the case of neutrophils, these show reduced uptake against P. kudriavzevii; however, murine phagocytic cells have a greater ability to kill C. guilliermondii and C. krusei when compared to C. albicans [47]. In the same line, C. tropicalis is more susceptible to damage by neutrophils than C. albicans [48]. Moreover, it has been reported that the interaction of C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii, C. albicans, N. glabrata, and C. guilliermondii with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is species-specific [42,49].
Analysis of C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, and P. kudriavzevii cell walls showed that the composition between the three species is similar [42]; however, this is not necessarily an indicator of a similar interaction profile with components of innate immunity. As proof of this, it was found that C. guilliermondii cells have lower levels of β-1,3-glucan, which stimulates low cytokine levels when this polysaccharide is exposed on the surface [42]. Yeast cells of C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, and P. kudriavzevii can stimulate higher cytokines levels than C. albicans when interacting with human PBMCs and human monocyte-derived macrophages [42]. C. parapsilosis shows structural similarities to the C. albicans cell wall; however, the arrangement of the components within the wall is different, which has an impact on the ability to activate PBMCs [50].
C. parapsilosis is one of the NAC species for which more information has been generated in recent years, including its interaction with the host [10]. For this species, it is known that the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6 are involved in its recognition by gingival epithelial cells, human PBMCs and macrophages [46,50,51,52]. In addition, galectin-3, mannose receptor, and dectin-1 are suggested to be receptors required for responses induced by C. parapsilosis [50,53,54]. In recent reports, it has been shown that C. parapsilosis stimulates stronger cytokine production than other species, such as C. albicans, because of greater exposure of β-1,3-glucan at the cell surface [50]. The disruption of C. parapsilosis OCH1, an important gene in the synthesis of the N-linked mannan’s outer chain [46], led to changes in the fungal interaction with human PBMCs, stimulating greater levels of IL-1β, in a dectin-1- and TLR4-dependent way [46].
The N. glabrata immune recognition has also been studied, and it is known that null mutants with defects in different components of the cell wall, such as β-1,3-glucan or chitin, stimulate a stronger inflammatory response in macrophages [45]. Little is known about the PRRs responsible for N. glabrata recognition by macrophages, but dectin-2 is important for host defense against this fungus [55]. A downstream analysis of the PRR signaling pathways determined that the fungus does not induce phosphorylation of the MAP kinases Erk1/2, SAPK/JNK, and p38. However, Syk tyrosine kinase, which signals downstream of C-type lectin receptors (dectin-1 and dectin-2), was activated upon infection of macrophages by N. glabrata [45,56]. This organism can survive and replicate in macrophages, which would offer it some advantages, such as immune evasion [57].
A component that plays an important role during the immune recognition of some Candida species is phosphomannan [58]. To determine the importance of this wall component in the C. tropicalis–host interaction, an mnn4∆ null mutant was generated [59]. It was found that cell wall phosphomannans are not required for the stimulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production by PBMCs [59]. Assays carried out with human monocyte-derived macrophages showed that the mnn4Δ null mutant strain was poorly phagocytosed by these cells [59]. These results are in line with those obtained in C. albicans, where the loss of phosphomannan reduced yeast phagocytosis by approximately 50% [60]. However, C. tropicalis cells are more phagocytosed than C. albicans cells in a dectin-1-dependent mechanism [59].
The mentioned cell–cell interactions play a relevant role in fungal immune recognition; however, there are humoral factors that are responsible for defending the host against NAC species. The complement system is known as a humoral factor of innate immunity against various pathogens. In species such as N. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis, the binding of complement proteins has been documented [44,61].
Even though there is considerable progress in understanding C. auris’s biological and clinical aspects, its interaction with the host’s immune system is just beginning to be investigated [62]. Previous work has shown that C. auris can evade the immune response generated by neutrophils [63]. These immune cells have an important role in the control of fungal infections such as candidiasis. These cells can kill the pathogen through the release of extracellular traps known as NETs [64,65]. It is known that after 4 h of interaction between C. albicans and human neutrophils there is an inhibition of cell growth; however, this is not observed when interacting with C. auris [65]. Human neutrophils cannot effectively kill C. auris, and cell recruitment is poor [63]. This type of immune evasion would have many consequences for those patients who have invasive candidiasis caused by this pathogen [63].
Analysis of cytokine production by human PBMCs established that C. auris and C. albicans could hardly stimulate TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 [42]. However, when heat-inactivated cells from the two species were used to stimulate cytokines, higher and similar levels of them were observed [42,50]. In addition, the C. auris uptake by human monocyte-derived macrophages is lower when compared to that observed with C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, and P. kudriavzevii [42].
In vivo and in vitro studies carried out with the C. auris clinical isolate BJCA001 demonstrated that once the infection with the fungus is carried out in immunocompetent C57BL/6 female mice, the yeasts can remain in the host and evade the mechanisms of defense [66]. When the fungal load in infected organs was analyzed, increased tissue colonization was observed; however, no morphological changes, such as pseudohyphae or mycelium, were documented [66]. Although there was an increase in colonization, the inflammation and tissue damage suffered by the mice proved to be less severe than the infection caused by C. albicans [66]. In line with these observations, interactions with bone-marrow-derived murine macrophages showed a significant increment in the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL1, and CXCL2 when interacting with C. albicans but not when the experiments were performed with C. auris, suggesting that the latter is a lesser potent inducer of the MAPK signaling pathway [66]. This reduced proinflammatory response could be related to changes in the β-1,3-glucans masking [66]
Finally, although the knowledge on immunity against different NAC species is an evolving and growing area, it is evident that the immune cell–fungus interaction differs among NAC species.

3. Immune Evasion Mechanisms in NAC Species

Candida spp. have co-evolved with their host and develop strategies to avoid recognition, thus preventing the onset of inflammatory responses. A well-described evasion mechanism studied in C. albicans to avoid recognition by phagocytes is the masking of the immune-stimulatory cell wall β-1,3-glucan layer with mannoproteins [67,68]. The induction of a strong pro-inflammatory response requires the synergistic recognition of β-glucans by dectin-1 and mannans by mannose receptor and TLR4; however, when glucans are buried by mannans the former is hardly recognized by dectin-1, and as a consequence, a poor cytokine profile is stimulated [69,70,71].
Another evasion strategy involves aspartic proteases, which degradate components of the innate immune system, such as salivary lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, cathepsin D, complement, interleukin-1β, and α2-macroglobulin [72]. These proteases are important for cell-wall integrity in N. glabrata [71,73]. N. glabrata glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked aspartyl proteases have an important role in activation and survival within macrophages, and are required for virulence, as the expression of these genes is up-regulated upon macrophage internalization [73]. Moreover, for C. parapsilosis the presence of genes that encode aspartic proteases involved in the survival within macrophages has been reported [71,74].
Phagocyte escape strategies have been extensively studied in C. albicans. Filamentation of phagocytized C. albicans cells causes perforation of immune cells, allowing the pathogen to escape [71,75]. In addition to macrophages’ mechanical perforation by C. albicans hyphae, pyroptosis, a programmed cell death pathway partially dependent on hyphal morphogenesis, mediates macrophage death following C. albicans infection [76]. However, other Candida species, such as N. glabrata, have different mechanisms when escaping from macrophages. This species survives and replicates within macrophages, unlike C. albicans, responding rapidly and robustly to oxidative stress [77]. In addition, it manipulates phagolysosome maturation [57], a feature shared with other NAC species, such as C. parapsilosis [74] and P. kudriavzevii [78].
Once the host immune response is activated, macrophages, neutrophils, and other phagocytic cells fight fungal pathogens by producing high levels of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide, resulting in oxidative and nitrosative stresses, respectively. Therefore, the activation of antioxidant responses is the main strategy of the pathogen before internalization by phagocytes. C. parapsilosis and N. glabrata have the Yap1 protein, which is the ortholog of C. albicans Cat1, responsible for the antioxidant systems activation, carbohydrate metabolism, and energy production [79,80]. In its antioxidant function, Yap1 is involved in the induction of conserved genes encoding antioxidant effectors, such as catalase Cta1 [77]. C. tropicalis also has a Yap1 protein and fulfills the same function as that described in N. glabrata and C. albicans, where it regulates the antioxidant pathway of thioredoxin, which protects them from the destruction by neutrophils [80,81,82].
The C. albicans Skn7 is another regulator that is required for resistance to hydrogen peroxide [83]. In an analysis by Pais et al. [80], the Skn7 homolog in C. parapsilosis was found to be an uncharacterized protein encoded by ORF CPAR2_304240 and similar to N. glabrata Skn7, participates in the response to H2O2 by inducing the expression of thioredoxins Trx2, Trr1, Tsa1, and catalase Cta1 [84]. In N. glabrata, the transcription factors Msn2 and Msn4 are also involved in the regulation of oxidative stress, through the regulation of Cta1, in a concerted action between these proteins with Yap1 and Skn7 [85].
Similarly, regulators of resistance to nitrosative stress have already been studied [86,87], and in the case of C. albicans, the best studied is Cta4, a positive zinc finger Zn(2)-Cys(6) regulator that controls the expression of the enzyme nitric acid dioxygenase Yhb1, necessary for detoxification. The N. glabrata Yap7 transcription factor acts on Yhb1, constitutively repressing its expression by binding to its promoter [88]. Yap4/6 is another N. glabrata transcriptional regulator that participates in resistance to nitrosative stress. In spite of the fact that its ortholog has been identified within the C. parapsilosis genome (ORF CPAR2_11470), its function remains to be established [80].
The reprogramming of carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism is another aspect that is involved in the persistence and evasion of phagocytes by pathogenic yeasts species [80]. This is because the environment within the phagocytic cells is limited in nutrients, especially nitrogen sources, such as amino acids [89]. It has been reported that Gln3 is a key regulator of nitrogen assimilation in N. glabrata since a null mutant strain in GLN3 showed that the growth rate decreased significantly in all the tested nitrogen sources. In addition, these mutants could not transport ammonium efficiently [89]. In C. albicans, the transcription factor Gcn4 plays a key role in the amino acid checkpoint response and is expressed when C. albicans is phagocytosed by neutrophils [90,91]. Among other functions, Gcn4 acts on the arginine biosynthetic pathway, which in turn is involved in the production of carbon dioxide and urea, metabolic products that induce filamentation inside macrophages that have phagocytized C. albicans as an escape mechanism [92]. In the phylogenetic analysis of Pais et al. [80], it was found that C. albicans Gcn4 is closely related to C. tropicalis ORF CTRG_02060, C. parapsilosis, and N. glabrata GCN4, suggesting that most likely these NAC species also carry out the evasion mechanism by adapting to amino acid starvation.
Biotin restriction has also been reported to reduce fungal fitness within macrophages, but phagocytosis induces up-regulation of biotin-related Candida genes [93]. Specifically, C. albicans and N. glabrata Vhr1 are important in regulating the short-term responses to the antifungal activities of macrophages and intracellular proliferation. Vht1 becomes relevant for N. glabrata replication and early and sustained intracellular growth of C. albicans hyphae and hyphal-induced macrophage damage [93].
Neutrophils are known to be predominant cells of the innate immune system that are involved in the control of fungal pathogens such as Candida spp. The strategy used by neutrophils to kill fungi is through phagocytosis or the release of NETs. Phagocytosis is effective against unicellular forms of pathogens, such as yeast cells, but for pathogens with larger forms, such as hyphae, NETs are a strategy for their control [94]. However, it has been reported that neutrophils are not able to perform phagocytosis or release NETs against C. auris, compared to C. albicans, which could suggest that there is an evasion mechanism that has not yet been fully elucidated [63]. Interestingly, another study by Navarro-Arias et al. [42] found that C. auris was barely able to stimulate the production of TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β, or IL-10 in human PBMCs, when compared to C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, and P. kudriavzevii, which were able to stimulate significantly higher levels of these pro-inflammatory cytokines. This could be a possible immune evasion mechanism that remains to be explored. A further observation about C. auris is the ability to form small groups of cells known as aggregates [95], which has been associated with biofilm formation [96]. Both the aggregative and non-aggregative phenotypes induced a minimal inflammatory response in a three-dimensional cutaneous epithelial model. However, when wounding was induced in this model, both phenotypes induced a greater response, but the aggregative phenotype was the most pro-inflammatory [96].

4. Development of New Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis Caused by NAC Species

In recent years, fungal infections have been considered a constant threat to the health of immunosuppressed, immunocompetent, and seriously ill patients [97,98]. Infections caused by Candida species represent the main cause of opportunistic infections worldwide, which has brought an increase in patient morbidity and mortality [99].
Factors such as the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the use of antifungal drugs have increased the frequent isolation of NAC species from clinical samples. Although in recent years there has been a constant development of antifungal drugs that attack the fungal cell wall and the plasma membrane, some of these pathogens have proven to be intrinsically resistant or have acquired resistance to these antifungal drugs, which leads to treatment failure [21,100,101].
Due to this problem, the development of effective and safe therapies is paramount, which can be used alone or in synergy with traditional drugs, to control candidiasis produced by the different Candida species [101,102].

4.1. Plant Compounds as Antifungal Therapy in Infections Caused by NAC Species

The search for new effective drugs against fungal pathogens has become an increasingly complicated task. Although new medical treatments against mycoses are being developed, specific therapies are limited due to the similarities between human and fungal cells, concerning the structure and biochemical processes [101,103,104]. Thus, the control of Candida infections has become a challenge for modern clinicians. Compounds derived from plants are known for the different medicinal properties they offer, including antifungal activities [104]. Unlike commonly used drugs, the manufacture of these promises greater effectiveness and less toxicity in patients [104,105].
Plants have been used throughout the years in different parts of the world for the treatment of diseases. Currently, several reports indicate the efficacy of plant metabolites as possible antifungal agents (see Table 1) [101,104]. It has been shown that the different metabolites help to inhibit fungal growth and alter its virulence [101]. Several plant extracts have been reported in different studies to have activities against Candida spp., including Allium sativum (garlic), Cinnamomum verum (cinnamon), and Origanum vulgare (oregano) [106,107,108].
One of the main reasons for the development of anti-Candida therapy using plant extracts is that they have unique characteristics, such as their high structural diversity, where primary and secondary metabolites are included [101]. The primary anti-Candida metabolites are some peptides and lipids, and the secondary metabolites include alkaloids, terpenes, steroids, phenolic compounds, and other types of organic substances [109,110,111]. Although most of studies have been focused on C. albicans, several studies have paid attention to NAC species, which turns out to be promising for this research area (see Table 1).
Table 1. Plant-derived compounds with antifungal properties against non-albicans Candida species.
Table 1. Plant-derived compounds with antifungal properties against non-albicans Candida species.
CompoundAntifungal EffectSourceEffect onReferences
Primary metabolites
Peptides
Ca ThiLoss of cell viability; increases oxidative stressCapsicum annuumC. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis[112,113]
Rc Alb-PepI and Rc Alb-PepIIInhibit biofilm formation; promote biofilm degradationRicinum communisC. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis[114]
Tn-AFLPPermeabilizes the yeast membraneTrapa natansC. tropicalis[115]
Cc Def3Inhibits cell growth; permeabilizes the yeast membrane; induces oxidative stressCapsicum chinenseC. tropicalis[116]
TesTIDecreases ATP levels; induces oxidative stressTecoma stansP. kudriavzevii[117]
PgTeLDecreases ATP levelsPunica granatumP. kudriavzevii[118]
PvD1Inhibits yeast growthPhaseolus vulgarisC. guilliermondii[119,120]
Secondary metabolites
Phenolic compounds
Gallic acidInhibits the formation of planktonic cells and biofilmsBuchenavia tomentosa, Rosa rugosa, Dimocarpus longan, Ligusticum mutellina, Tamarix gallica, Anogeissus latifoliaC. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii, N. glabrata, C. parapsilosis[121,122,123]
Caffeic acidInhibits the formation of planktonic cellsPotentilla sp., L. mutellina, Limonium avei, Cirsium sp., Olea europeaC. parapsilosis[124]
Protocatechuic acidInhibits the formation of planktonic cellsR. rugosa, L. aveiC. tropicalis[123]
Cinnamic acidInhibits planktonic cell growthT. gallicaC. parapsilosis, N. glabrata, C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii[123,125]
Benzoic acidInhibits planktonic cell growthL. mutellina, T. gallica, Cirsium sp.C. parapsilosis, N. glabrata, C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii[125]
Alkaloids and terpenes
CinnamaldehydeReduces FKS1 gene expression; reduces ergosterol synthesisCinnamomum verumN. glabrata[126]
ThymolIncreases the permeability of the cell membraneThymus vulgaris, Origanum vulgareP. kudriavzevii, C. tropicalis[127]
GeraniolInhibits cell growth; regulates the biosynthesis of ergosterol-C. tropicalis, N. glabrata[33]
BerberineModifies the synthesis of ergosterolBerberis sp.C. tropicalis[128]
EpidihydropinidineInhibits cell growthPicea abiesN. glabrata[129]
Yohimbine and vincamineInhibits cell growthPausinystalia johimbe, Vinca minorC. parapsilosis[124]

4.1.1. Potential In Vitro Treatments against NAC Species Developed from Primary Plant Metabolites

The new alternatives for antifungal drugs include antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which are defined as small molecules that are produced by different organisms, including plants. These molecules have gained special attention due to their potent antimicrobial activity against different organisms, such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi [112,130]. Some of these peptides rapidly kill microorganisms and act in synergism with other AMPs and different common drugs [114]. Unlike other antimicrobial drugs, AMPs have low toxicity to mammalian cells and exert their inhibitory activity at low concentrations [114].
Thionins (Thi) are known as a family of low molecular weight plant AMPs (~5 kDa), which defend plants against different pathogens [112]. Like other AMPs, its activity is based on the interaction with membrane phospholipids, generating membrane instability [131]. Previous reports demonstrated the isolation of Thi from the fruits of the Capsicum annuum species, named Ca Thi [113]. Ca Thi showed antimicrobial activity against C. albicans and C. tropicalis, inducing loss of viability by membrane damage [112]. The analysis of reactive oxygen species production showed that in C. tropicalis there was an increase in their production, suggesting that this could be the basis for the growth inhibitory effect [112]. When the synergism between Ca Thi and fluconazole was tested, the combination of the two showed an increase in the inhibitory activity of C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis. In C. parapsilosis, when Ca Thi and fluconazole were combined, 100% growth inhibition was obtained and for C. tropicalis, an inhibition of 96% was achieved. However, when the treatments were used separately, the inhibition was 12%. These data suggest that this synergy could have an important effect in controlling the growth of these two Candida spp. [112].
Other peptides used for the possible treatment against C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, identified as Rc Alb-PepI and Rc Alb-PepII, were obtained from Ricinus communis seeds [114]. These peptides demonstrated low toxicity to mammalian cells, an important feature that suggests they are effective for their intended use, and showed antifungal activity against C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, inhibiting biofilm formation [114]. In addition, it is thought that both AMPs inhibit adhesion to the extracellular matrix [132,133]. Rc Alb-PepII showed more activity against C. parapsilosis (MIC90 of 25 µM) and caused damage to the cell membrane, as previously reported for Ca Thi [112,114]. Similar results to those of Rc Alb-PepII and Ca Thi were reported when the Tn-AFP1 peptide obtained from fruits of the Trapa natans was used against C. tropicalis [115]. From the fruits of the Capsicum chinense, an AMP called Cc Def3 was characterized and showed growth inhibition against C. tropicalis. The antifungal mechanism was based on promoting the cell membrane permeabilization and induction of oxidative stress [116].
For the treatment of P. kudriavzevii, several plant-derived AMPs have been evaluated. Among them is a trypsin inhibitor, which was obtained from the Tecoma stans leaves and was named TesTI [117]. Intracellular ATP levels were decreased, and this was associated with mitochondria damage by oxidative stress [117,134]. In addition, TestTI was not cytotoxic when tested in human PBMCs [117]. The PgTeL peptide obtained from the Punica granatum sarcotesta also acts as a potential P. kudriavzevii antifungal agent [118]. The use of this AMP resulted in a decrease in intracellular ATP and induced lipid peroxidation [118].
N. glabrata and C. guilliermondii have been studied less in terms of the plant AMP effect. However, different peptides have been evaluated to treat the infection caused by C. guilliermondii in vitro [119,120]. Among them, peptides isolated from C. annuum seeds have been reported to have antifungal activity against C. guilliermondii [113]. These AMP inhibited the growth of this yeast and affected the plasma membrane [135]. In addition, the Pv D1 peptide from Phaseolus vulgaris seeds showed antifungal activity against C. guilliermondii [119,120].
Interestingly, for C. auris, no plant AMP is known to date that can inhibit its growth. However, human AMPs have been described that may be effective against some clinical isolates of C. auris, such as histatins, specifically histatin-5 and peptide LL-37 [136].

4.1.2. Potential In Vitro Treatments against NAC Species Developed from Plant Secondary Metabolites

Plant bioactive compounds can act as anti-Candida agents due to the cell wall and membrane alterations they cause, especially by reducing the synthesis of ergosterol and polysaccharides [101]. Plants have various secondary metabolites that show this activity, among which are phenolic compounds, alkaloids, terpenes, and essential oils. These have shown promise for the treatment of infections caused by NAC species. Some examples of in vitro treatments from secondary metabolites that have been used to study their possible role as therapeutic agents against NAC species will be described below

Phenolic Compounds

Plant families, such as the Combretaceae and Acanthaceae, have been the most studied as possible therapeutic agents against fungal infections [105]. It has been shown that the leaves, seeds, fruits, and flowers contain the most enriched plant components [105]. Leaves and fruits are the ones that have the highest levels of phenolic compounds; however, their concentration varies depending on the solvent used during the extraction process and its storage [137].
Phenols have shown promising in vitro and in vivo activity against some Candida spp. [138,139]. Phenolic acid derivatives, such as gallic, caffeic, cinnamic, benzoic, protocatechuic, and phenylacetic acid, also have antifungal activity [109]. Gallic acid extracted from different plant species, such as Buchenavia tomentosa, Rosa rugosa, Dimocarpus longan, Ligusticum mutellina, Tamarix gallica, and Anogeissus latifolia, has antifungal activity against C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii, N. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, with values of MIC ranging between 200 and 12,500 µg/mL, also presenting low cellular cytotoxicity [123]. This acid also can inhibit the formation of planktonic cells and biofilms of some strains of N. glabrata, P. kudriavzevii, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis under different MIC values [121,122,140,141]. Concerning caffeic acid obtained from plant species, such as Potentilla sp., L. mutellina, Limonium avei, Kitaibelia vitifolia, Cirsium sp., and Olea europea, it has been reported that it prevents the planktonic cell formation of C. parapsilosis with a MIC of 16 µg/mL [124]. The protocatechuic acid obtained from the plants R. rugosa, L. avei, and Cirsium sp is only capable of inhibiting the formation of C. tropicalis planktonic cells at a MIC of 400 µg/mL [109]. Cinnamic acid obtained from T. gallica has a strong inhibitory potential against the planktonic growth of C. parapsilosis, N. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and P. kudriavzevii [109,125]. The last of the phenolic compounds, benzoic acid, obtained from L. mutellina, T. gallica, and Cirsium sp., have antifungal activity against the same species mentioned [125]. These last phenolic compounds were presented as promising candidates to carry out synergies with commonly used antifungal drugs; however, this synergy was only effective against C. albicans [125].
The flavonoid (E)-6-(2-carboxyethyl), isolated from Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, can inhibit P. kudriavzevii growth with an IC50 of 44 nM; however, it does not show antifungal properties against N. glabrata [142]. In addition, this compound shows synergism with ethyl gallate, reducing the IC levels more than 100-fold [142]. A methanolic extract obtained from Cynomorium coccineum showed antifungal activity against C. guilliermondii and P. kudriavzevii, with a MIC of 0.025 mg/mL [143]. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts obtained from the Eugenia dysenterica and Pouteria ramiflora, commonly used in Brazil in popular medicine, show excellent activity against C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii, C. guilliermondii, and C. parapsilosis, with the important characteristic that the MIC values are low [144].
Plant-derived phenols, such as carvacrol, thymol, eugenol, and methyl eugenol, also have antifungal activity against C. auris. Carvacrol proved to be the most effective phenol, with no cytotoxic or mutagenic effects in human cells at a MIC of 250 µg/mL. Carvacrol can inhibit C. auris adherence to epithelial cells and reduces proteinase production [145].

Alkaloids and Terpenes

Other secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids and terpenes, have been studied to establish their potential as antifungal compounds [101]. In some fungi, it has been reported that terpenes can inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-metolglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, as well as cell growth, and trigger apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [102,146]. The terpene cinnamaldehyde obtained from C. verum (cinnamon) has fungicidal activity against N. glabrata isolates. The terpene caused a reduction in the FKS1 expression, which is responsible for the biosynthesis of β-1,3-glucan [126] and reduced ergosterol synthesis [126]. The latter was a consequence of the down-regulation of genes involved in ergosterol synthesis, such as ERG2-4, ERG10, and ERG11, and ABC transporters encoding genes such as CDR1 [101,126].
The anti-biofilm activity of terpenes is behind the efficacy of thymol, geraniol, and carvacrol in the treatment of candidiasis [147]. Thymol (2-isopropyl-5-methyl phenol) is the most abundant constituent of Thymus vulgaris and O. vulgare [127,148]. This terpene has shown antifungal properties against P. kudriavzevii and C. tropicalis with a MIC of 39 µg/mL and 78 µg/mL, respectively. In C. albicans, thymol binds to plasma membrane ergosterol, increasing ionic permeability, and thus, causing cell death [105,149].
In addition, it was shown that the terpene geraniol is capable of inhibiting the C. tropicalis and N. glabrata growth with low MIC values, again regulating the ergosterol biosynthesis [33]. Moreover, it also inhibits the plasma membrane proton pump-ATPase of these two fungal species [33]. Geraniol together with fluconazole and amphotericin B show synergy, which causes the growth inhibition of several Candida spp. [33].
Some alkaloids have been shown to have terpene-like activity. Berberine, known as an alkaloid derived from plants of the Berberis genus, can inhibit the growth of fluconazole-resistant C. tropicalis and C. auris isolates [128,150]. This compound can modify the ergosterol synthesis and increase the efficiency of the expulsion pumps. These events are more noticeable when there is a synergism between berberine and fluconazole, which would indicate that this alkaloid could be useful in the treatment of C. tropicalis [101,128]. Another alkaloid that has been studied for its activity against N. glabrata is epidihydropinidine, an alkaloid obtained from the bark of the Picea abies. It is not cytotoxic for human cells and the MIC at which it shows the effect is low (5.37 µg/mL) [129]. Alkaloids, such as yohimbine and vincamine, which are obtained from the bark of the Pausinystalia johimbe and Vinca minor, respectively, have been shown to have antifungal activity against the pathogen C. parapsilosis [124]. Thus, terpenes and alkaloids seem to be promising agents against the different NAC species that are frequently found in hospital environments.

Essential Oils

Essential oils (EO) obtained from plants have been widely used over time and many properties are currently attributed to them [106]. Thanks to recent studies, it is known that these EOs have interesting antimicrobial properties because of their high content of phenolic derivatives [151,152], and several investigations have focused on the study of the anti-Candida activity of different EOs [102,153].
The anti-Candida activity of EO derived from cinnamon can inhibit C. parapsilosis biofilm formation at a MIC of 250 µg/mL, while fungal growth is inhibited at concentrations of 500 µg/mL [153]. The EO derived from Cinnamomum tamala can reduce the biomass of preformed biofilms of N. glabrata and C. tropicalis, affecting the exopolysaccharide layer of both strains [154].
A wide variety of EOs obtained from different plant species has been evaluated against N. glabrata, such as O. vulgare (oregano), Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon), Lippia graveolens (Mexican oregano), T. vulgaris (thyme), Salvia officinalis (sage), Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary), Ocimum basilicum (basil), and Zingiber officinale (ginger) [108]. Through the analysis of these EOs by microdilution techniques, it was found that the EOs of thyme, sage, rosemary, basil, and ginger did not show antifungal activity against this fungal species; however, the EOs of oregano, Mexican oregano, and cinnamon showed antifungal activity [108]. Among the EO that displayed the highest antifungal levels against a group of fluconazole-sensitive N. glabrata strains are those from oregano and Mexican oregano, while cinnamon EO showed better antifungal activity against N. glabrata isolates that were resistant to fluconazole [108].
EOs derived from different plants were tested against C. tropicalis, P. kudriavzevii, N. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis [102]. Among the thirty EOs tested, the oil from Cupressus sempervirens (cypress) was shown to have an antifungal effect, acting against all Candida spp. evaluated, with variable MICs among species [102]. The EO from Citrus lemon showed activity against C. tropicalis and N. glabrata, with MIC of 250 µg/mL, and the EO from Litsea cubeba showed antifungal activity against P. kudriavzevii and N. glabrata, with MIC of 62.5 and 250 µg/mL, respectively [102].
The EO from Lippia origanoides has been evaluated against C. auris. Perillyl alcohol and p-cymene showed activity against 90% and 100% of C. auris isolates, whereas verbenone, carveol, and trans-β-caryophyllene only showed activity against some strains of this species [155]. Interestingly, strains resistant to the main antifungal drugs from C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. auris are the most susceptible to EO derived from L. origanoides [155]. In C. auris, few studies have evaluated the in vitro activity of EO; however, recent works have evaluated the anti-C. auris effect of EO from Lippia sidoides [156]. When these EOs are encapsulated in nanostructured lipids, they showed potent activity against this fungal species and were not cytotoxic in in vivo models [156]. The α-cyperone is an EO extracted from Cyperus rotundus; it has inhibitory properties on the growth of C. auris at concentrations of 150 µg/mL. However, its antifungal mechanism has not been elucidated [157]. Cinnamaldehyde EO extracted from cinnamon bark contains trans-cinnamaldehyde, which is a fungicide that has activity against C. auris, and it is likely that the active compound can compromise cell membrane and yeast cell wall integrity [158].
Although many studies are reporting the anti-Candida effects of plants, as shown in this work, none of the plant-derived extracts have been tested for use in humans [104]. This could be related to the lack of information on its efficacy, toxicity, or lack of knowledge of its chemical structures. However, these molecules are promising and could help control invasive candidiasis caused by different Candida spp.

5. Concluding Remarks

Even though research on candidiasis has focused largely on C. albicans and the caused infection, other species, such as C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, N. glabrata, P. kudriavzevii, C. auris, and C. guilliermondii, have emerged as relevant etiological agents of candidiasis in recent years. The importance of these species relies on their constant isolation in clinical samples, the ability to acquire antifungal drug resistance, and the evasion of the host immune response. The search for new drugs against fungal pathogens has become acomplicated task and specific therapies are increasingly limited, which has challenged modern clinical practice.
Due to these problems, in recent years efforts have been made to develop new effective and safe alternative therapies that can be used alone or in synergy with traditional antifungal drugs. As a result, new bioactive compounds have been identified, coming from primary and secondary metabolites of different plant species. Plants have very interesting characteristics; they naturally contain compounds with antimicrobial properties, and although studies and information are needed to date to use these compounds as a treatment against candidiasis, the findings obtained in vitro open the venue to explore their use in the clinical setting. Unlike commonly used drugs, the use of these bioactive plant compounds promises greater effectiveness and less toxicity in patients.
The development of new therapeutic strategies against the different NAC species will contribute to the control of infections caused by these species and will help reduce the frequency of resistance to common antifungal drugs. Among the challenges to be addressed in this field, we can include the lack of specific chemical structures for some plant-extracted compounds, the development of chemical synthesis to supply the pharmaceutical market, or the sustainable isolation directly from plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G.-G., U.R.-S. and H.M.M.-M.; investigation M.G.-G., U.R.-S. and H.M.M.-M.; resources, H.M.M.-M.; data curation, M.G.-G., U.R.-S. and H.M.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.-G., U.R.-S. and H.M.M.-M.; supervision, H.M.M.-M.; project administration, H.M.M.-M.; funding acquisition, H.M.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (ref. FC 2015-02-834, Ciencia de Frontera 2019-6380), and Red Temática Glicociencia en Salud (CONACYT-México). The funding sources that supported this work did not have any involvement in the design, acquisition, and analysis of data or the writing of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. McCarty, T.P.; White, C.M.; Pappas, P.G. Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sardi, J.C.O.; Scorzoni, L.; Bernardi, T.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Giannini, M.J.S.M. Candida species: Current epidemiology, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, natural antifungal products and new therapeutic options. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mandras, N.; Roana, J.; Scalas, D.; Del Re, S.; Cavallo, L.; Ghisetti, V.; Tullio, V. The Inhibition of Non-albicans Candida species and uncommon yeast pathogens by selected essential oils and their major compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Enoch, D.A.; Yang, H.; Aliyu, S.H.; Micallef, C. The changing epidemiology of invasive fungal infections. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1508, 17–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zuza-Alves, D.L.; Silva-Rocha, W.P.; Chaves, G.M. An update on Candida tropicalis based on basic and clinical approaches. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, D.; An, N.; Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Fan, Y.; Feng, J. Candida tropicalis distribution and drug resistance is correlated with ERG11 and UPC2 expression. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2021, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castanheira, M.; Messer, S.A.; Rhomberg, P.R.; Pfaller, M.A. Antifungal susceptibility patterns of a global collection of fungal isolates: Results of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (2013). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 85, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fan, X.; Xiao, M.; Liao, K.; Kudinha, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hou, X.; Kong, F.; Xu, Y.C. Notable increasing trend in azole non-susceptible Candida tropicalis causing invasive candidiasis in China (august 2009 to july 2014): Molecular epidemiology and clinical Azole consumption. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pristov, K.E.; Ghannoum, M.A. Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Toth, R.; Nosek, J.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Gabaldon, T.; Bliss, J.M.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Turner, S.A.; Butler, G.; Vagvolgyi, C.; Gacser, A. Candida parapsilosis: From genes to the bedside. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00111-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Govender, N.P.; Patel, J.; Magobo, R.E.; Naicker, S.; Wadula, J.; Whitelaw, A.; Coovadia, Y.; Kularatne, R.; Govind, C.; Lockhart, S.R.; et al. Emergence of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis causing bloodstream infection: Results from laboratory-based sentinel surveillance in South Africa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1994–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pinhati, H.M.; Casulari, L.A.; Souza, A.C.; Siqueira, R.A.; Damasceno, C.M.; Colombo, A.L. Outbreak of candidemia caused by fluconazole resistant Candida parapsilosis strains in an intensive care unit. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Papp, C.; Kocsis, K.; Tóth, R.; Bodai, L.; Willis, J.R.; Ksiezopolska, E.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Mora Montes, H.; Gabaldón, T.; et al. Echinocandin-induced microevolution of Candida parapsilosis influences virulence and abiotic stress tolerance. mSphere 2018, 3, e00547-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Chen, M.; Ma, K.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; Yan, G.; Wang, C.; Shao, J. Abundance interaction in Candida albicans and Candida glabrata mixed biofilms under diverse conditions. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R.; Williams, D.W.; Azeredo, J. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: Biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cleveland, A.A.; Farley, M.M.; Harrison, L.H.; Stein, B.; Hollick, R.; Lockhart, S.R.; Magill, S.S.; Derado, G.; Park, B.J.; Chiller, T.M. Changes in incidence and antifungal drug resistance in candidemia: Results from population-based laboratory surveillance in Atlanta and Baltimore, 2008–2011. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 1352–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Filler, E.E.; Liu, Y.; Solis, N.V.; Wang, L.; Diaz, L.F.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G.; Yeaman, M.R. Identification of Candida glabrata transcriptional regulators that govern stress resistance and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00146-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cleveland, A.A.; Harrison, L.H.; Farley, M.M.; Hollick, R.; Stein, B.; Chiller, T.M.; Lockhart, S.R.; Park, B.J. Declining incidence of candidemia and the shifting epidemiology of Candida resistance in two US metropolitan areas, 2008–2013: Results from population-based surveillance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vallabhaneni, S.; Cleveland, A.A.; Farley, M.M.; Harrison, L.H.; Schaffner, W.; Beldavs, Z.G.; Derado, G.; Pham, C.D.; Lockhart, S.R.; Smith, R.M. Epidemiology and risk factors for echinocandin nonsusceptible Candida glabrata bloodstream infections: Data from a large multisite population-based candidemia surveillance program, 2008–2014. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 2, ofv163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martínez-Herrera, E.; Frías-De-León, M.G.; Hernández-Castro, R.; García-Salazar, E.; Arenas, R.; Ocharan-Hernández, E.; Rodríguez-Cerdeira, C. Antifungal resistance in clinical isolates of Candida glabrata in Ibero-America. J. Fungi 2021, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current aspects in the biology, pathogeny, and treatment of Candida krusei, a neglected fungal pathogen. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1673–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fan, S.R.; Liu, X.P.; Li, J.W. Clinical characteristics of vulvovaginal candidiasis and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species isolates among patients in southern China from 2003 to 2006. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2008, 34, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nguyen, K.T.; Ta, P.; Hoang, B.T.; Cheng, S.; Hao, B.; Nguyen, M.H.; Clancy, C.J. Anidulafungin is fungicidal and exerts a variety of postantifungal effects against Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3347–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Forastiero, A.; Garcia-Gil, V.; Rivero-Menendez, O.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Monteiro, M.C.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Jordan, R.; Agorio, I.; Mellado, E. Rapid development of Candida krusei echinocandin resistance during caspofungin therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6975–6982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gong, J.; Xiao, M.; Wang, H.; Kudinha, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Wu, W.; He, L.; Xu, Y.C.; Zhang, J. Genetic differentiation, diversity, and drug susceptibility of Candida krusei. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, J.; Tian, S.; Li, F.; Sun, G.; Yun, K.; Cheng, S.; Chu, Y. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of candidemia caused by Meyerozyma guilliermondii complex in cancer patients undergoing surgery. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hirano, R.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kudo, K.; Ohnishi, M. Retrospective analysis of mortality and Candida isolates of 75 patients with candidemia: A single hospital experience. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hirano, R.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kitazawa, J.; Yamamoto, S.; Kayaba, H. Epidemiology, practice patterns, and prognostic factors for candidemia; and characteristics of fourteen patients with breakthrough Candida bloodstream infections: A single tertiary hospital experience in Japan. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018, 11, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kimura, M.; Araoka, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Asano-Mori, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Yamagoe, S.; Ohno, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Abe, M.; Yuasa, M.; et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of breakthrough candidemia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in a japanese hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01791-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Savini, V.; Catavitello, C.; Onofrillo, D.; Masciarelli, G.; Astolfi, D.; Balbinot, A.; Febbo, F.; D’Amario, C.; D’Antonio, D. What do we know about Candida guilliermondii? A voyage throughout past and current literature about this emerging yeast. Mycoses 2011, 54, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Satoh, K.; Makimura, K.; Hasumi, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Uchida, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 53, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Spivak, E.S.; Hanson, K.E. Candida auris: An emerging fungal pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01588-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sharma, Y.; Khan, L.A.; Manzoor, N. Anti-Candida activity of geraniol involves disruption of cell membrane integrity and function. J. Mycol. Med. 2016, 26, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Horton, M.V.; Johnson, C.J.; Zarnowski, R.; Andes, B.D.; Schoen, T.J.; Kernien, J.F.; Lowman, D.; Kruppa, M.D.; Ma, Z.; Williams, D.L.; et al. Candida auris cell wall mannosylation contributes to neutrophil evasion through pathways divergent from Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. mSphere 2021, 6, e0040621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sabino, R.; Veríssimo, C.; Pereira, Á.A.; Antunes, F. Candida auris, an agent of hospital-associated outbreaks: Which challenging issues do we need to have in mind? Microorganisms 2020, 8, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Schelenz, S.; Hagen, F.; Rhodes, J.L.; Abdolrasouli, A.; Chowdhary, A.; Hall, A.; Ryan, L.; Shackleton, J.; Trimlett, R.; Meis, J.F.; et al. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2016, 5, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. García-Carnero, L.C.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Reyes-Martínez, J.E.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current trends to control fungal pathogens: Exploiting our knowledge in the host-pathogen interaction. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018, 11, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Czechowicz, P.; Nowicka, J.; Gościniak, G. Virulence factors of Candida spp. and host immune response important in the pathogenesis of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lim, S.J.; Ali, M.S.M.; Sabri, S.; Noor, N.D.M.; Salleh, A.B.; Oslan, S.N. Opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida spp.: Secreted and membrane-bound virulence factors. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 1127–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Talapko, J.; Juzbašić, M.; Matijević, T.; Pustijanac, E.; Bekić, S.; Kotris, I.; Škrlec, I. Candida albicans-the virulence factors and clinical manifestations of infection. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Díaz-Jiménez, D.F.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Role of the fungal cell wall in pathogenesis and antifungal resistance. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2012, 6, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Navarro-Arias, M.J.; Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Amezcua-Hernández, D.G.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Estrada-Mata, E.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Franco, B.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Differential recognition of Candida tropicalis, Candida guilliermondii, Candida krusei, and Candida auris by human innate immune cells. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 783–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Netea, M.G.; Brown, G.D.; Kullberg, B.J.; Gow, N.A. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mendoza-Reyes, D.F.; Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Candida lusitaniae: Biology, pathogenicity, virulence factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 5121–5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kasper, L.; Seider, K.; Hube, B. Intracellular survival of Candida glabrata in macrophages: Immune evasion and persistence. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Pérez-García, L.A.; Csonka, K.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Estrada-Mata, E.; Mellado-Mojica, E.; Németh, T.; López-Ramírez, L.A.; Toth, R.; López, M.G.; Vizler, C.; et al. Role of protein glycosylation in Candida parapsilosis cell wall integrity and host interaction. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Vecchiarelli, A.; Bistoni, F.; Cenci, E.; Perito, S.; Cassone, A. In-vitro killing of Candida species by murine immunoeffectors and its relationship to the experimental pathogenicity. Sabouraudia 1985, 23, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roilides, E.; Holmes, A.; Blake, C.; Pizzo, P.A.; Walsh, T.J. Effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and interferon-γ on antifungal activity of human polymorphonuclear neutrophils against pseudohyphae of different medically important Candida species. J. Leuk. Biol. 1995, 57, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Høgåsen, A.K.; Abrahamsen, T.G.; Gaustad, P. Various Candida and Torulopsis species differ in their ability to induce the production of C3, factor B and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in human monocyte cultures. J. Med. Microbiol. 1995, 42, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Estrada-Mata, E.; Navarro-Arias, M.J.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Mellado-Mojica, E.; López, M.G.; Csonka, K.; Gacser, A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Members of the Candida parapsilosis complex and Candida albicans are differentially recognized by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bahri, R.; Curt, S.; Saidane-Mosbahi, D.; Rouabhia, M. Normal human gingival epithelial cells sense C. parapsilosis by toll-like receptors and module its pathogenesis through antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 940383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Tóth, A.; Zajta, E.; Csonka, K.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Netea, M.G.; Gácser, A. Specific pathways mediating inflammasome activation by Candida parapsilosis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Linden, J.R.; Kunkel, D.; Laforce-Nesbitt, S.S.; Bliss, J.M. The role of galectin-3 in phagocytosis of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis by human neutrophils. Cell. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1127–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Tóth, A.; Csonka, K.; Jacobs, C.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Netea, M.G.; Gácser, A. Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis induce different T-cell responses in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ifrim, D.C.; Bain, J.M.; Reid, D.M.; Oosting, M.; Verschueren, I.; Gow, N.A.; van Krieken, J.H.; Brown, G.D.; Kullberg, B.J.; Joosten, L.A.; et al. Role of dectin-2 for host defense against systemic infection with Candida glabrata. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Drummond, R.A.; Saijo, S.; Iwakura, Y.; Brown, G.D. The role of Syk/CARD9 coupled C-type lectins in antifungal immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seider, K.; Brunke, S.; Schild, L.; Jablonowski, N.; Wilson, D.; Majer, O.; Barz, D.; Haas, A.; Kuchler, K.; Schaller, M.; et al. The facultative intracellular pathogen Candida glabrata subverts macrophage cytokine production and phagolysosome maturation. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 3072–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jigami, Y.; Odani, T. Mannosylphosphate transfer to yeast mannan. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1426, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Franco, B.; Clavijo-Giraldo, D.M.; Hernández, N.V.; Estrada-Mata, E.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Role of protein phosphomannosylation in the Candida tropicalis-macrophage interaction. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. González-Hernández, R.J.; Jin, K.; Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Díaz-Jiménez, D.F.; Trujillo-Esquivel, E.; Clavijo-Giraldo, D.M.; Tamez-Castrellón, A.K.; Franco, B.; Gow, N.A.R.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Phosphomannosylation and the functional analysis of the extended Candida albicans MNN4-like gene family. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meri, T.; Hartmann, A.; Lenk, D.; Eck, R.; Würzner, R.; Hellwage, J.; Meri, S.; Zipfel, P.F. The yeast Candida albicans binds complement regulators factor H and FHL-1. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 5185–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bruno, M.; Kersten, S.; Bain, J.M.; Jaeger, M.; Rosati, D.; Kruppa, M.D.; Lowman, D.W.; Rice, P.J.; Graves, B.; Ma, Z.; et al. Transcriptional and functional insights into the host immune response against the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1516–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Johnson, C.J.; Davis, J.M.; Huttenlocher, A.; Kernien, J.F.; Nett, J.E. Emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris evades neutrophil attack. mBio 2018, 9, e01403-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Mansour, M.K.; Levitz, S.M. Interactions of fungi with phagocytes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2002, 5, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Urban, C.F.; Reichard, U.; Brinkmann, V.; Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Huang, X.; et al. Innate immune responses against the fungal pathogen Candida auris. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gantner, B.N.; Simmons, R.M.; Underhill, D.M. Dectin-1 mediates macrophage recognition of Candida albicans yeast but not filaments. Embo J. 2005, 24, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gow, N.A.; Netea, M.G.; Munro, C.A.; Ferwerda, G.; Bates, S.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Walker, L.; Jansen, T.; Jacobs, L.; Tsoni, V.; et al. Immune recognition of Candida albicans beta-glucan by dectin-1. J. Infect. Dis. 2007, 196, 1565–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dennehy, K.M.; Willment, J.A.; Williams, D.L.; Brown, G.D. Reciprocal regulation of IL-23 and IL-12 following co-activation of Dectin-1 and TLR signaling pathways. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gantner, B.N.; Simmons, R.M.; Canavera, S.J.; Akira, S.; Underhill, D.M. Collaborative induction of inflammatory responses by dectin-1 and Toll-like receptor 2. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Miramón, P.; Kasper, L.; Hube, B. Thriving within the host: Candida spp. interactions with phagocytic cells. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 202, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Naglik, J.; Albrecht, A.; Bader, O.; Hube, B. Candida albicans proteinases and host/pathogen interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaur, R.; Ma, B.; Cormack, B.P. A family of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked aspartyl proteases is required for virulence of Candida glabrata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7628–7633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Horváth, P.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Hamari, Z.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Gácser, A. The identification of gene duplication and the role of secreted aspartyl proteinase 1 in Candida parapsilosis virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lorenz, M.C.; Bender, J.A.; Fink, G.R. Transcriptional response of Candida albicans upon internalization by macrophages. Eukaryot. Cell. 2004, 3, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Vylkova, S.; Lorenz, M.C. Phagosomal neutralization by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans induces macrophage pyroptosis. Infect. Immun. 2017, 85, e00832-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Roetzer, A.; Klopf, E.; Gratz, N.; Marcet-Houben, M.; Hiller, E.; Rupp, S.; Gabaldón, T.; Kovarik, P.; Schüller, C. Regulation of Candida glabrata oxidative stress resistance is adapted to host environment. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. García-Rodas, R.; González-Camacho, F.; Rodríguez-Tudela, J.L.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Zaragoza, O. The interaction between Candida krusei and murine macrophages results in multiple outcomes, including intracellular survival and escape from killing. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 2136–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Limjindaporn, T.; Khalaf, R.A.; Fonzi, W.A. Nitrogen metabolism and virulence of Candida albicans require the GATA-type transcriptional activator encoded by GAT1. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Cavalheiro, M.; Romão, D.; Teixeira, M.C. Transcriptional control of drug resistance, virulence and immune system evasion in pathogenic fungi: A cross-species comparison. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Leal, S.M., Jr.; Vareechon, C.; Cowden, S.; Cobb, B.A.; Latgé, J.P.; Momany, M.; Pearlman, E. Fungal antioxidant pathways promote survival against neutrophils during infection. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 2482–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Lessing, F.; Kniemeyer, O.; Wozniok, I.; Loeffler, J.; Kurzai, O.; Haertl, A.; Brakhage, A.A. The Aspergillus fumigatus transcriptional regulator AfYap1 represents the major regulator for defense against reactive oxygen intermediates but is dispensable for pathogenicity in an intranasal mouse infection model. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007, 6, 2290–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Homann, O.R.; Dea, J.; Noble, S.M.; Johnson, A.D. A phenotypic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Saijo, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Izumikawa, K.; Mihara, T.; Takazono, T.; Kosai, K.; Imamura, Y.; Seki, M.; Kakeya, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; et al. Skn7p is involved in oxidative stress response and virulence of Candida glabrata. Mycopathologia 2010, 169, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Briones-Martin-del-Campo, M.; Cañas-Villamar, I.; Montalvo-Arredondo, J.; Riego-Ruiz, L.; Castaño, I.; De Las Peñas, A. High resistance to oxidative stress in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata is mediated by a single catalase, Cta1p, and is controlled by the transcription factors Yap1p, Skn7p, Msn2p, and Msn4p. Eukaryot. Cell. 2008, 7, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Ullmann, B.D.; Myers, H.; Chiranand, W.; Lazzell, A.L.; Zhao, Q.; Vega, L.A.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L.; Gardner, P.R.; Gustin, M.C. Inducible defense mechanism against nitric oxide in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 2004, 3, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Chiranand, W.; McLeod, I.; Zhou, H.; Lynn, J.J.; Vega, L.A.; Myers, H.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Lorenz, M.C.; Gustin, M.C. CTA4 Transcription factor mediates induction of nitrosative stress response in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 2008, 7, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Merhej, J.; Delaveau, T.; Guitard, J.; Palancade, B.; Hennequin, C.; Garcia, M.; Lelandais, G.; Devaux, F. Yap7 is a transcriptional repressor of nitric oxide oxidase in yeasts, which arose from neofunctionalization after whole genome duplication. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 96, 951–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pérez-Delos Santos, F.J.; Riego-Ruiz, L. Gln3 is a main regulator of nitrogen assimilation in Candida glabrata. Microbiology 2016, 162, 1490–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fradin, C.; De Groot, P.; MacCallum, D.; Schaller, M.; Klis, F.; Odds, F.C.; Hube, B. Granulocytes govern the transcriptional response, morphology and proliferation of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, Y.T.; Fang, Y.Y.; Sun, Y.W.; Hsu, H.C.; Weng, S.M.; Tseng, T.L.; Lin, T.H.; Shieh, J.C. THR1 mediates GCN4 and CDC4 to link morphogenesis with nutrient sensing and the stress response in Candida albicans. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 3193–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Ghosh, S.; Navarathna, D.H.; Roberts, D.D.; Cooper, J.T.; Atkin, A.L.; Petro, T.M.; Nickerson, K.W. Arginine-induced germ tube formation in Candida albicans is essential for escape from murine macrophage line RAW 264.7. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 1596–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Sprenger, M.; Hartung, T.S.; Allert, S.; Wisgott, S.; Niemiec, M.J.; Graf, K.; Jacobsen, I.D.; Kasper, L.; Hube, B. Fungal biotin homeostasis is essential for immune evasion after macrophage phagocytosis and virulence. Cell. Microbiol. 2020, 22, e13197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Branzk, N.; Lubojemska, A.; Hardison, S.E.; Wang, Q.; Gutierrez, M.G.; Brown, G.D.; Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Borman, A.M.; Szekely, A.; Johnson, E.M. Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere 2016, 1, e00189-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Brown, J.L.; Delaney, C.; Short, B.; Butcher, M.C.; McKloud, E.; Williams, C.; Kean, R.; Ramage, G. Candida auris phenotypic heterogeneity determines pathogenicity in vitro. mSphere 2020, 5, e00371-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Pierce, C.G.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Candidiasis drug discovery and development: New approaches targeting virulence for discovering and identifying new drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2013, 8, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: A persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Sullivan, D.J.; Henman, M.C.; Moran, G.P.; O’Neill, L.C.; Bennett, D.E.; Shanley, D.B.; Coleman, D.C. Molecular genetic approaches to identification, epidemiology and taxonomy of non-albicans Candida species. J. Med. Microbiol. 1996, 44, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Guevara-Lora, I.; Bras, G.; Karkowska-Kuleta, J.; González-González, M.; Ceballos, K.; Sidlo, W.; Rapala-Kozik, M. Plant-derived substances in the fight against infections caused by Candida species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pedroso, R.D.S.; Balbino, B.L.; Andrade, G.; Dias, M.; Alvarenga, T.A.; Pedroso, R.C.N.; Pimenta, L.P.; Lucarini, R.; Pauletti, P.M.; Januário, A.H.; et al. In vitro and in vivo anti-Candida spp. activity of plant-derived products. Plants 2019, 8, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Monciardini, P.; Iorio, M.; Maffioli, S.; Sosio, M.; Donadio, S. Discovering new bioactive molecules from microbial sources. Microb. Biotechnol. 2014, 7, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Soliman, S.S.M.; Semreen, M.H.; El-Keblawy, A.A.; Abdullah, A.; Uppuluri, P.; Ibrahim, A.S. Assessment of herbal drugs for promising anti-Candida activity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. de Oliveira Santos, G.C.; Vasconcelos, C.C.; Lopes, A.J.O.; de Sousa Cartágenes, M.D.S.; Filho, A.; do Nascimento, F.R.F.; Ramos, R.M.; Pires, E.; de Andrade, M.S.; Rocha, F.M.G.; et al. Candida infections and therapeutic strategies: Mechanisms of action for traditional and alternative agents. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Vale-Silva, L.; Silva, M.J.; Oliveira, D.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.; Pinto, E. Correlation of the chemical composition of essential oils from Origanum vulgare subsp. virens with their in vitro activity against pathogenic yeasts and filamentous fungi. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 61, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ebrahimy, F.; Dolatian, M.; Moatar, F.; Majd, H.A. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of Garcin(®) and fluconazole on Candida vaginitis. Singap. Med. J. 2015, 56, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Soares, I.H.; Loreto, É.S.; Rossato, L.; Mario, D.N.; Venturini, T.P.; Baldissera, F.; Santurio, J.M.; Alves, S.H. In vitro activity of essential oils extracted from condiments against fluconazole-resistant and -sensitive Candida glabrata. J. Mycol. Med. 2015, 25, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Teodoro, G.R.; Ellepola, K.; Seneviratne, C.J.; Koga-Ito, C.Y. Potential use of phenolic acids as anti-Candida agents: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Aldholmi, M.; Marchand, P.; Ourliac-Garnier, I.; Le Pape, P.; Ganesan, A. A decade of antifungal leads from natural products: 2010–2019. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wojtunik-Kulesza, K.A.; Kasprzak, K.; Oniszczuk, T.; Oniszczuk, A. Natural monoterpenes: Much more than only a scent. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, e1900434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Trindade, F.G.; Da Cunha, M.; Gomes, V.M. Thionin-like peptide from Capsicum annuum fruits: Mechanism of action and synergism with fluconazole against Candida species. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Taveira, G.B.; Mathias, L.S.; da Motta, O.V.; Machado, O.L.; Rodrigues, R.; Carvalho, A.O.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Perales, J.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Gomes, V.M. Thionin-like peptides from Capsicum annuum fruits with high activity against human pathogenic bacteria and yeasts. Biopolymers 2014, 102, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dias, L.P.; Souza, P.F.N.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Araújo, N.M.S.; Tilburg, M.F.V.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Carneiro, R.F.; Lopes, J.L.S.; Sousa, D.O.B. RcAlb-PepII, a synthetic small peptide bioinspired in the 2S albumin from the seed cake of Ricinus communis, is a potent antimicrobial agent against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida parapsilosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020, 1862, 183092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mandal, S.M.; Migliolo, L.; Franco, O.L.; Ghosh, A.K. Identification of an antifungal peptide from Trapa natans fruits with inhibitory effects on Candida tropicalis biofilm formation. Peptides 2011, 32, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Aguieiras, M.C.L.; Resende, L.M.; Souza, T.A.M.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Gomes, V.M.; Mello, É.O. Potent anti-Candida fraction isolated from Capsicum chinense fruits contains an antimicrobial peptide that is similar to plant defensin and is able to inhibit the activity of different α-amylase enzymes. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 862–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Patriota, L.L.; Procópio, T.F.; de Souza, M.F.; de Oliveira, A.P.; Carvalho, L.V.; Pitta, M.G.; Rego, M.J.; Paiva, P.M.; Pontual, E.V.; Napoleão, T.H. A trypsin inhibitor from Tecoma stans leaves inhibits growth and promotes ATP depletion and lipid peroxidation in Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. da Silva, P.M.; de Moura, M.C.; Gomes, F.S.; da Silva Trentin, D.; de Oliveira, A.P.S.; de Mello, G.S.V.; da Rocha Pitta, M.G.; de Melo Rego, M.J.B.; Coelho, L.; Macedo, A.J.; et al. PgTeL, the lectin found in Punica granatum juice, is an antifungal agent against Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Games, P.D.; dos Santos, I.S.; Mello, É.O.; Diz, M.S.S.; Carvalho, A.O.; de Souza-Filho, G.A.; Da Cunha, M.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Ferreira, B.d.S.; Gomes, V.M. Isolation, characterization and cloning of a cDNA encoding a new antifungal defensin from Phaseolus vulgaris L. seeds. Peptides 2008, 29, 2090–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mello, E.O.; Ribeiro, S.F.; Carvalho, A.O.; Santos, I.S.; Da Cunha, M.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Gomes, V.M. Antifungal activity of PvD1 defensin involves plasma membrane permeabilization, inhibition of medium acidification, and induction of ROS in fungi cells. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Alves, C.T.; Ferreira, I.C.; Barros, L.; Silva, S.; Azeredo, J.; Henriques, M. Antifungal activity of phenolic compounds identified in flowers from North Eastern Portugal against Candida species. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Liu, M.; Katerere, D.R.; Gray, A.I.; Seidel, V. Phytochemical and antifungal studies on Terminalia mollis and Terminalia brachystemma. Fitoterapia 2009, 80, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Teodoro, G.R.; Brighenti, F.L.; Delbem, A.C.; Delbem, Á.C.; Khouri, S.; Gontijo, A.V.; Pascoal, A.C.; Salvador, M.J.; Koga-Ito, C.Y. Antifungal activity of extracts and isolated compounds from Buchenavia tomentosa on Candida albicans and non-albicans. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ozçelik, B.; Kartal, M.; Orhan, I. Cytotoxicity, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic acids. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Faria, N.C.; Kim, J.H.; Gonçalves, L.A.; Martins Mde, L.; Chan, K.L.; Campbell, B.C. Enhanced activity of antifungal drugs using natural phenolics against yeast strains of Candida and Cryptococcus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 52, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gupta, P.; Gupta, S.; Sharma, M.; Kumar, N.; Pruthi, V.; Poluri, K.M. Effectiveness of phytoactive molecules on transcriptional expression, biofilm matrix, and cell wall components of Candida glabrata and Its clinical isolates. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12201–12214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Sánchez, M.E.; Turina, A.V.; García, D.A.; Nolan, M.V.; Perillo, M.A. Surface activity of thymol: Implications for an eventual pharmacological activity. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2004, 34, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shao, J.; Shi, G.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; Wang, C. Antiproliferation of berberine in combination with fluconazole from the perspectives of reactive oxygen species, ergosterol and drug efflux in a fluconazole-resistant Candida tropicalis Isolate. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Fyhrquist, P.; Virjamo, V.; Hiltunen, E.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Epidihydropinidine, the main piperidine alkaloid compound of Norway spruce (Picea abies) shows promising antibacterial and anti-Candida activity. Fitoterapia 2017, 117, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Guaní-Guerra, E.; Santos-Mendoza, T.; Lugo-Reyes, S.O.; Terán, L.M. Antimicrobial peptides: General overview and clinical implications in human health and disease. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 135, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Stec, B. Plant thionins—The structural perspective. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. de la Fuente-Núñez, C.; Cardoso, M.H.; de Souza Cândido, E.; Franco, O.L.; Hancock, R.E. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1858, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chung, P.Y.; Khanum, R. Antimicrobial peptides as potential anti-biofilm agents against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 50, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sies, H. Oxidative stress: Oxidants and antioxidants. Exp. Physiol. 1997, 82, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ribeiro, S.F.; Carvalho, A.O.; Da Cunha, M.; Rodrigues, R.; Cruz, L.P.; Melo, V.M.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Melo, E.J.; Gomes, V.M. Isolation and characterization of novel peptides from chilli pepper seeds: Antimicrobial activities against pathogenic yeasts. Toxicon 2007, 50, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Perez-Rodriguez, A.; Eraso, E.; Quindós, G.; Mateo, E. Antimicrobial peptides with anti-Candida activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Martins, N.; Barros, L.; Henriques, M.; Silva, S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Activity of phenolic compounds from plant origin against Candida species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 648–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Evensen, N.A.; Braun, P.C. The effects of tea polyphenols on Candida albicans: Inhibition of biofilm formation and proteasome inactivation. Can. J. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shahzad, M.; Sherry, L.; Rajendran, R.; Edwards, C.A.; Combet, E.; Ramage, G. Utilising polyphenols for the clinical management of Candida albicans biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Rangkadilok, N.; Tongchusak, S.; Boonhok, R.; Chaiyaroj, S.C.; Junyaprasert, V.B.; Buajeeb, W.; Akanimanee, J.; Raksasuk, T.; Suddhasthira, T.; Satayavivad, J. In vitro antifungal activities of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) seed extract. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gehrke, I.T.; Neto, A.T.; Pedroso, M.; Mostardeiro, C.P.; Da Cruz, I.B.; Silva, U.F.; Ilha, V.; Dalcol, I.I.; Morel, A.F. Antimicrobial activity of Schinus lentiscifolius (Anacardiaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Dias Silva, M.J.; Simonet, A.M.; Silva, N.C.; Dias, A.L.T.; Vilegas, W.; Macías, F.A. Bioassay-guided isolation of fungistatic compounds from Mimosa caesalpiniifolia leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1496–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gonçalves, M.J.; Piras, A.; Porcedda, S.; Marongiu, B.; Falconieri, D.; Cavaleiro, C.; Rescigno, A.; Rosa, A.; Salgueiro, L. Antifungal activity of extracts from Cynomorium coccineum growing wild in Sardinia island (Italy). Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2247–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Correia, A.F.; Silveira, D.; Fonseca-Bazzo, Y.M.; Magalhães, P.O.; Fagg, C.W.; da Silva, E.C.; Gomes, S.M.; Gandolfi, L.; Pratesi, R.; de Medeiros Nóbrega, Y.K. Activity of crude extracts from Brazilian cerrado plants against clinically relevant Candida species. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Shaban, S.; Patel, M.; Ahmad, A. Improved efficacy of antifungal drugs in combination with monoterpene phenols against Candida auris. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Zore, G.B.; Thakre, A.D.; Jadhav, S.; Karuppayil, S.M. Terpenoids inhibit Candida albicans growth by affecting membrane integrity and arrest of cell cycle. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Dalleau, S.; Cateau, E.; Bergès, T.; Berjeaud, J.M.; Imbert, C. In vitro activity of terpenes against Candida biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. de Lira Mota, K.S.; de Oliveira Pereira, F.; de Oliveira, W.A.; Lima, I.O.; de Oliveira Lima, E. Antifungal activity of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil and its constituent phytochemicals against Rhizopus oryzae: Interaction with ergosterol. Molecules 2012, 17, 14418–14433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. de Castro, R.D.; de Souza, T.M.; Bezerra, L.M.; Ferreira, G.L.; Costa, E.M.; Cavalcanti, A.L. Antifungal activity and mode of action of thymol and its synergism with nystatin against Candida species involved with infections in the oral cavity: An in vitro study. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Shao, J.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; Ma, K.; Yan, G.; Yin, D. Antifungal evaluation of traditional herbal monomers and their potential for inducing cell wall remodeling in Candida albicans and Candida auris. Biofouling 2020, 36, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils--a review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Serra, E.; Hidalgo-Bastida, L.A.; Verran, J.; Williams, D.; Malic, S. Antifungal activity of commercial essential oils and biocides against Candida albicans. Pathogens 2018, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Pires, R.H.; Montanari, L.B.; Martins, C.H.; Zaia, J.E.; Almeida, A.M.; Matsumoto, M.T.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J. Anticandidal efficacy of cinnamon oil against planktonic and biofilm cultures of Candida parapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis. Mycopathologia 2011, 172, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Farisa Banu, S.; Rubini, D.; Shanmugavelan, P.; Murugan, R.; Gowrishankar, S.; Karutha Pandian, S.; Nithyanand, P. Effects of patchouli and cinnamon essential oils on biofilm and hyphae formation by Candida species. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zapata-Zapata, C.; Loaiza-Oliva, M.; Martínez-Pabón, M.C.; Stashenko, E.E.; Mesa-Arango, A.C. In vitro activity of essential oils distilled from colombian plants against Candida auris and other Candida species with different antifungal susceptibility profiles. Molecules 2022, 27, 6837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Baldim, I.; Paziani, M.H.; Grizante Barião, P.H.; Kress, M.; Oliveira, W.P. Nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with Lippia sidoides essential oil as a strategy to combat the multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Horn, C.; Vediyappan, G. Anticapsular and antifungal activity of α-cyperone. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tran, H.N.H.; Graham, L.; Adukwu, E.C. In vitro antifungal activity of Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark and leaf essential oils against Candida albicans and Candida auris. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8911–8924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antifungal resistance mechanisms in non-albicans Candida species. (A) Mutation in ergosterol biosynthesis that causes a decrease in the ergosterol content in the cell membrane and induces the replacement of biosynthetic precursors such as liquesterol and lanosterol. (B) Mutation in ERG11 that encodes the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase, causing defects in ergosterol synthesis. (C) Mutation in cytosine deaminase (FCY1), cytosine permease (FCY2) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (FUR1) facilitating resistance to flucytosine. (D) Mutation in FKS1 that generates resistance to caspofungins.
Figure 1. Antifungal resistance mechanisms in non-albicans Candida species. (A) Mutation in ergosterol biosynthesis that causes a decrease in the ergosterol content in the cell membrane and induces the replacement of biosynthetic precursors such as liquesterol and lanosterol. (B) Mutation in ERG11 that encodes the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase, causing defects in ergosterol synthesis. (C) Mutation in cytosine deaminase (FCY1), cytosine permease (FCY2) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (FUR1) facilitating resistance to flucytosine. (D) Mutation in FKS1 that generates resistance to caspofungins.
Jof 09 00011 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Ramírez-Sotelo, U.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Non-albicans Candida Species: Immune Response, Evasion Mechanisms, and New Plant-Derived Alternative Therapies. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010011

AMA Style

Gómez-Gaviria M, Ramírez-Sotelo U, Mora-Montes HM. Non-albicans Candida Species: Immune Response, Evasion Mechanisms, and New Plant-Derived Alternative Therapies. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Gaviria, Manuela, Uriel Ramírez-Sotelo, and Héctor M. Mora-Montes. 2023. "Non-albicans Candida Species: Immune Response, Evasion Mechanisms, and New Plant-Derived Alternative Therapies" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop