Next Article in Journal
Two New Species and a New Record of Microdochium from Grasses in Yunnan Province, South-West China
Next Article in Special Issue
Alumina as an Antifungal Agent for Pinus elliottii Wood
Previous Article in Journal
β-Xylosidase SRBX1 Activity from Sporisorium reilianum and Its Synergism with Xylanase SRXL1 in Xylose Release from Corn Hemicellulose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Controlling Dead Wood Decomposition in an Old-Growth Temperate Forest in Central Europe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eco-Physiological Adaptations of the Xylotrophic Basidiomycetes Fungi to CO2 and O2 Mode in the Woody Habitat

by
Victor A. Mukhin
* and
Daria K. Diyarova
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620144 Yekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(12), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121296
Submission received: 16 November 2022 / Revised: 7 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eco-Physiology of Wood Decay Fungi: Basics and Applications)

Abstract

:
The aim of this research is to study of eco-physiological adaptations of xylotrophic fungi (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes) to hypoxia, anoxia and hypercapnia as the main environmental factors that determine the activity of fungi in woody habitat. The study was carried out on seven species of polypore fungi widespread in the preforest-steppe pine-birch forests of the Central Urals, including both white (D. tricolor, D. septentrionalis, F. fomentarius, H. rutilans, T. biforme) and brown (F. betulina, F. pinicola) rot. Their CO2 and O2 gas exchange were analyzed in natural samples of woody substrates (Betula pendula, Pinus sylvestris) and basidiocarps by the chamber method using a CO2/O2 gas analyzer. It was shown that the intensity of O2 gas exchange is positively related to the oxygen concentration but is not very sensitive to a decrease in its content in the woody habitat. Xylotrophic fungi are able to completely exhaust the O2 in the habitat, and this process is linear, indicating that they do not have threshold values for oxygen content. Oxygen consumption is accompanied by an adequate linear increase in CO2 concentration up to 18–19%. At a concentration of 5–10%, carbon dioxide does not affect the gas exchange of xylotrophic fungi and can even enhance it, but at 20% it significantly reduces its intensity. Xylotrophic fungi are resistant to high CO2 concentrations and remain viable at 100% CO2 concentration and are capable of growth under these conditions. In an oxygen-free habitat, anaerobic CO2 emissions are recorded; when O2 appears, its consumption is restored to the level preceding anoxia. Xylotrophic fungi are the specialized group of saprotrophic microaerophilic and capnophilic facultative anaerobes adapted to develop at low oxygen and high carbon dioxide concentration, anoxia.

1. Introduction

Xylotrophic fungi (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes) are a group of organisms with relatively little biological diversity: 900 (former USSR), and 1700 (North America) species [1,2]. Most of them (57–75%) belong to Aphyllophoroid Hymenomycetes, and the smaller part (23–37%)—to Agaricoid ones. The minor component (2–6%) is Heterobasidioid fungi. According to Parmasto [3], they originated possibly from primitive unspecialized soil Basidiomycetes in the Cretaceous or earlier. Phylogenetic analysis based on the reconstruction of the origin of AA2 genes shows that white rot fungi could appear about 300 million years ago, at the end of the Carboniferous [4].
Currently, these are the only known organisms capable of the biochemical conversion of the lignocellulose complex and decomposition of wood without the participation of other decomposers [2,5,6,7,8]. Wood decomposition is an alternative to the photosynthesis process of the oxidative conversion of organic carbon from wood into CO2 and, given that forests are the largest terrestrial carbon reservoirs [9,10], xylotrophic fungi are not only globally significant emitters of carbon dioxide but also of corresponding scale consumers of oxygen [11].
Wood for them is not only a trophic resource, but also habitat, which in many of its parameters is very specific and, one might even say, extreme. One of its important features is low gas permeability and, as a result, for wood the special gas mode is typical. The main features of this gas mode are low (1.2–4.5%) concentrations of O2 and high (7.2–26.3—CO2 [12,13]. According to Hintikka and Korhonen [14], in coniferous wood decayed by xylotrophic fungi, the content of CO2 is 35 (1.6%), and in hardwood—88 (3.5%) times higher than in air. In aspen wood affected by Phellinus tremulae, at the initial stage of decomposition, the concentration of O2 and CO2 is 0.1–0.8% and 12.8–13.6%, respectively, at a more advanced stage, the content of O2 increases to 8.4–17.8%, while CO2 remains at the same level: 3.6–13.5%. At the final stage of decomposition, oxygen is 19.4–20.9%, and CO2 is 0.3–1.8%. Usually, in wood decomposed by fungi, O2 is about 6%, and CO2—is 14% [13].
If hypoxia and hypercapnia are obligate characteristics of the gas mode of the woody habitat, then oxygen-free conditions, anoxia, is most likely an episodic phenomenon that occurs under certain environmental conditions, primarily at high humidity. In wood that has low permeability to gases (spruce, larch), anaerobic conditions are formed at 50–70% humidity, and in easily permeable wood (birch, pine, poplar), at 100–110% [13]. The content of O2 in the wood also depends on temperature, increased temperature increases the intensity of its consumption by fungi and, as a result, the oxygen concentration in wood decreases, while CO2 increases [6]. Xylotrophic fungi are able to fully use the oxygen in the habitat and thereby create physiologically determined anoxia [15].
Xylotrophic fungi are adapted to the gaseous conditions of the woody habitat. This is indicated by the fact that they are (a) not sensitive to low oxygen concentrations (growth stops at an O2 concentration of 0.4%), (b) resistant to high concentrations of carbon dioxide (they grow at a CO2 concentration of 30–40%, and a 10% concentration stimulates growth), (c) remain viable in a long time stay viable in absence of oxygen in the woody habitat [7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The gas mode, as we believe, is the main factor of the woody habitat, the presence of adaptations which is a necessary condition for the xylotrophic lifestyle of fungi. According to our hypothesis, these adaptations are microaerophilia, capnophilia, and facultative anaerobiosis, which form a complex of interrelated and interdependent adaptations of xylotrophic fungi to the gas mode of the woody habitat.
The present work is devoted to the substantiation of this hypothesis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Objects of Study

The study was carried out on the seven species: Daedaleopsis tricolor (Bull.) Bondartsev & Singer, D. septentrionalis (P. Karst.) Niemelä, Fomes fomentarius (L.) Fr., Fomitopsis betulina (Bull.) B. K. Cui, M. L. Han and Y. C. Dai, F. pinicola (Sw.) P. Karst., Hapalopilus rutilans (Pers.) Murrill, Trichaptum biforme (Fr.) Ryvarden. These are widespread polypore fungi [21], both white (D. tricolor, D. septentrionalis, F. fomentarius, H. rutilans, T. biforme) and brown (F. betulina, F. pinicola) rot (Figure 1). Woody debris of Betula pendula Roth and Pinus sylvestris L. with basidiocarps of these fungi were collected in preforest-steppe pine-birch forests of the Central Urals. Fungi were identified based on the morphological features of basidiocarps [21], and species names were checked by the Index Fungorum database [22]. In the laboratory, wood was cleaned of leaves and needles, the basidiocarps were separated from them and sawn into samples, the size of which, depending on specific tasks, varied from 2.6 to 7.5 cm in length and from 1.7 to 5.8 cm in diameter.
The gas exchange of fungal basidiocarps and samples of wood decayed by them (hereinafter, substrates) was analyzed separately. This makes it possible to compare the carbon-oxygen gas exchange in two parts of the fungal organism developing in the air (basidiocarps) and wood (substrate mycelium).

2.2. Assessment of the Intensity of Gas Exchange

Samples of basidiocarps and substrates were placed in sealed exposure chambers, the volume of which, depending on the aim of the experiment and the size of the samples, varied from 0.27 to 1.65 L. The concentration O2 and CO2 in the chambers were measured by CO2/O2 gas analyzer (“Microsensornaya Tekhnika”, Russia). This is a device combining the infrared and electrochemical principle of operation, equipped with an automated flow sampling system with a built-in micro-computer, with a measurement error ± 0.2 vol. %. Gas measurements were carried out either in automatic mode with an interval of 10–60 min (dynamics of O2 consumption and CO2 accumulation) or in manual mode (most of the experiments). The intensity of O2 and CO2 gas exchange was estimated from the difference between their initial and final concentration in the chambers in vol. %/h according to the formula:
Consumption O2/emission CO2 = ΔO2/CO2/E × 60 × 273/T,
where ΔO2/CO2—the amount of O2 consumed/CO2 emitted (%), E—the exposure time (min), T—the air temperature (K).

2.3. Preparation of Gaseous Media with Different Contents of O2 and CO2

For the preparation of gaseous media with different oxygen content, 0.5-L chambers with samples of basidiocarps, substrates were filled with nitrogen of high purity (volume fraction 99.995%), and then high-purity O2 (volume fraction 99.95%) was injected with a syringe at a concentration of 5, 10, and 20% by volume. The actual content of O2 in the chambers was estimated using a gas analyzer, and it was close to the calculated one: 5.18 ± 0.12, 10.03 ± 0.14, and 20.17 ± 0.25%. Gaseous media with different CO2 contents were prepared similarly; 5, 10, and 20% high-purity CO2 (volume fraction 99.99%) was injected into 0.5 L chambers filled with air with a syringe at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20%. The actual CO2 concentration in the chambers, estimated using a gas analyzer, was close to the calculated one: 5.04 ± 0.20, 10.53 ± 0.14, and 20.20 ± 0.17%. The intensity of gas exchange depending on the oxygen concentration was estimated from the emission of CO2, and carbon dioxide—from the consumption of O2. Both high-purity nitrogen and high-purity carbon dioxide were used to create anoxic conditions. To do this, gases were pumped into the chambers until in them the gas analyzer registered zero O2. The absence of oxygen in the chambers was also monitored during subsequent measurements, and in order to eliminate or at least reduce the effect of carbon dioxide contained in the samples on the results even before they were placed in oxygen-free conditions, the nitrogen in the chambers was periodically renewed while maintaining anoxia. In an oxygen-free nitrogen medium, fungal gas exchange was assessed by the intensity of CO2 emission, and the viability of basidiocarp and substrate samples after their exposure to anoxic conditions was assessed by the intensity of O2 and CO2 gas exchange after pumping into the chamber air.

2.4. Evaluation of Mycelium Growth under Anoxic Conditions

The assessment of the possibility and intensity of growth of xylotrophic fungi in the absence of O2 was performed on dikaryotic cultures of D. septentrionalis isolated from the basidiocarps of this fungus using the standard method [23]. Wort (4%)—agar (2%) was used as a nutrient medium for the isolation and preservation of cultures, as well as during experimental work. Petri dishes 10 cm in diameter with dikaryotic mycelium D. septentrionalis were placed closed in 0.5 L exposure chambers filled with nitrogen (n = 3) and carbon dioxide (n = 3). The control was three Petri dishes placed in chambers filled with air. All chambers were placed in a thermostat at a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C, and after 3 days the radial size of the mycelium was measured in four directions and the growth rate was calculated in mm/day. Then the chambers with dishes were filled with air and placed in a thermostat with the same temperature, after 3 days the radial growth of mycelium over this period was measured and the rate of growth in the air was calculated.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 8.0 program. Arithmetic means (m) are given with standard errors (SE), t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multiple comparisons. The Spearman correlation coefficient (R) was used to characterize the relationships between variables. When describing the results of statistical evaluation, the values of the corresponding criterion and the levels of its significance are given. Statistical significance was indicated with a p-value < 0.05

3. Results

Gas exchange of xylotrophic fungi is typically aerobic, including consumption of O2 and emission of CO2 (Figure 2). The correlation coefficients indicate a close, functional level of connection between these processes, both in the gas exchange of basidiocarps (R = −0.99) and substrates (R = −0.99). An important feature of the carbon-oxygen gas exchange of basidiocarps and substrates is their ability to completely deplete O2. Zero oxygen content was recorded in the chambers with basidiocarps and F. fomentarius substrates, while the CO2 concentration in the chambers reached 18%. In chambers with F. pinicola basidiocarps, the minimum O2 concentration was 0.01%, and the maximum CO2 concentration was 19%. The substrates of F. betulina are characterized by a low activity of gas exchange, and over 2 days of their exposure, the O2 concentration in the chambers decreased from 20.7% to 1.7%, and the CO2 concentration increased to 15%. Both processes—consumption of O2 and release of CO2—with a high degree of reliability, both in the case of gas exchange of basidiocarps (R2 = 0.95–0.98) and substrates (R2 = 0.97–0.98) are described by linear regression equations (Figure 2). They show that the intensity of O2 consumption by basidiocarps and substrates is 13–20% higher than the CO2 emission. Correspondingly, the ratio of CO2 and O2 volumes, or the respiratory coefficient, is less than unity: in the basidiocarps F. fomentarius and F. pinicola it is 0.8–0.9 and in the substrates F. fomentarius and F. betulina—0.9. The quotient varies within 0.8–1.0 in the range of O2 concentrations from 19 to 0.01%, and CO2 from 0.8 to 19% and does not show a correlation with the content of these gases in the chambers.
In contrast to the respiratory coefficient, the O2 consumption by xylotrophic fungi closely and positively correlates with its concentration. This is typical both for the gas exchange of the basidiocarps F. fomentarius (R = 0.83, p = 0.01, n = 8), F. pinicola (R = 0.98, p = 0.0001, n = 13), and the substrates of F. fomentarius (R = 0.74, p = 0.003, n = 13) and F. betulina (R = 0.98, p = 0.0001, n = 17). At the same time, the intensity of O2 consumption is weakly dependent on O2 concentration (Figure 3). Thus, with a decrease in O2 from 17 to 0.15% (113 times), the intensity of its consumption by basidiocarps of F. fomentarius decreases only 1.2 times: from 3.21 to 2.58 vol. %/h. The same for F. pinicola basidiocarps: under decrease in O2 in chambers from 18 to 0.03% (600 times) O2 consumption decreases 1.5 times: from 2.42 to 1.60 vol. %/h. The intensity of O2 gas exchange of substrates reacts similarly to the oxygen concentration: in F. fomentarius it decreases by 1.5 times with a decrease in O2 from 19.5% to 0.25% (78 times), and in F. betulina by 1.7 times with a decrease in O2 by 12 times—from 19.7% to 1.6%. On average, as linear regression equations show, the intensity of O2 consumption decreases 20 (basidiocarps)—50–150 times (substrates) slower than its concentration in chambers (Figure 3).
Consumption of O2 by fungi is accompanied by an increase in CO2 concentration and, as the data show, the intensity of CO2 emission by basidiocarps closely but negatively correlates with its concentration: F. fomentarius—R = −0.97 (p = 0.001, n = 8), F. pinicola—R = −0.91 (p = 0.0001, n = 13). In the case of F. betulina substrates, a close negative relationship between the CO2 content in the chambers and the intensity of its emission is also recorded (R = −0.97, p = 0.0001, n = 17), while it is not observed in F. fomentarius substrates: R = −0.31, p = 0.28, n = 13. As in the case of O2 gas exchange, there is very little reaction of the intensity of CO2 emission to CO2 increase: decreases by 10–30 (basidiocarps)—40–130 times (substrates) more slowly than increase CO2 (Figure 4).
The weak sensitivity of xylotrophic fungi to O2 concentration is confirmed by the data in Table 1 and Table 2. They show that in a nitrogen medium that does not contain CO2, but with different concentrations of O2 (5, 10 and 20%), the ratio of the volumes of emitted CO2 and consumed O2 fluctuates within 0.7–1.1 and does not show a relationship with the oxygen content (Table 1). Under these conditions also no relation between the concentration of O2 in chambers and the intensity of basidiocarps and substrates gas exchange (Table 2).
The weak sensitivity of xylotrophic fungi to CO2 is shown by the data on the assessment of their gas exchange in chambers with an O2 concentration equal to its content in air, but with 0.04, 5, 10, and 20% CO2 (Table 3 and Table 4). According to them, at 5–10% CO2 in the chambers, the respiratory quotient is the same as at 0.04%, and the intensity of O2 gas exchange does not decrease, but even increases. However, at 20% CO2 concentration, a clearly pronounced negative effect on gas exchange is observed: the CO2/O2 ratio increases to 2.0–3.8 and gas exchange intensity decreases by two to six times compared with one at 5–10%.
The high resistance of xylotrophic fungi to carbon dioxide is evidenced by the fact that they remain viable even when they are kept in chambers with 100% CO2 concentration. Thus, after 72 h of exposure to such conditions, D. tricolor basidiocarps have the same O2 consumption intensity in the air as the initial one before exposure to a carbon dioxide medium. Similarly, such high concentrations of CO2 react and the gas exchange of D. tricolor substrates and the intensity of O2 consumption does not differ before and after exposure to 100% carbon dioxide (Table 5).
At 100% CO2 concentration, as our data show, xylotrophic fungi are capable of growth. Thus, in 100% carbon dioxide the dikaryotic mycelium of D. septentrionalis grows at a rate only two times less than in the air and when in chambers where CO2 is replaced by air, it grows at the same rate as in CO2 (Figure 5).
The ability of D. septentrionalis to grow in a 100% carbon dioxide medium indicates not only its resistance to high concentrations of CO2 but also to the possibility of development in anaerobic conditions. This is confirmed by the data showing that the mycelium of D. septentrionalis grows in an anoxic nitrogen medium at the same rate as in air (Table 6).
In oxygen-free nitrogen media CO2 emission was also recorded both in basidiocarps and substrates, although at a lower intensity than in air (Table 7). Basidiocarps and substrate exposition in oxygen-free nitrogen media do not affect gas exchange in the air or lead to its decrease (Table 8).

4. Discussion

In air, the gas exchange of basidiocarps and substrates of xylotrophic fungi is typically aerobic: O2 and CO2 fluxes are functionally related, and multidirectional; their ratio 0.7–1.0 is in the range characteristic for aerobic respiration. At the same time, the aerobic carbon-oxygen gas exchange of xylotrophic fungi has a number of fundamental features: 1. The respiratory quotient does not show a connection with O2 in a wide range of concentrations—almost to zero; 2. The intensity of O2 consumption by xylotrophic fungi positively correlates with its concentration in its habitat, but very weakly reacts to O2 decrease: decreases by 10–30 (basidiocarps)—40–130 times (substrates) more slowly than O2 go down; 3. Xylotrophic fungi are able to fully use O2 and this process is linear and it is indicated that they do not have any critical, threshold values for the oxygen content. All this, in our opinion, indicates that xylotrophic fungi belong to microaerophiles, organisms adapted to develop in environments with low oxygen content [24].
Under conditions of hindered diffusion, a decrease in oxygen in the habitat is accompanied by an adequate increase in carbon dioxide. As in the case of O2 consumption, the intensity of CO2 emission reacts weakly to an increase in CO2 decreases 10–30 (basidiocarps)—40–130 times (substrates) slower than the CO2 content increase. At a 5–10% concentration, CO2 either does not affect the gas exchange of xylotrophic fungi, or even enhances it, but at 20% significantly (up to six times) reduces O2 consumption intensity. Xylotrophic fungi are very resistant to carbon dioxide, they remain viable in a 100% CO2 atmosphere and are capable to grow in these conditions. These are all undoubted signs of capnophiles—extremophilic organisms that successfully develop at 10–15% of CO2 concentration [25]. Resistance to CO2, or capnophilia, is most likely what fundamentally distinguishes xylotrophic fungi from litter saprotrophs, whose growth decreases in proportion to an increase in carbon dioxide concentration [14].
The fact that xylotrophic fungi are facultative anaerobes—organisms that use oxygen but are able also to do without it [25], is clearly evidenced by the following: they are able to remain viable in oxygen-free media for a long time and conduct CO2 gas exchange as well as growth. When O2 appears in the habitat, its consumption by fungi is restored and often at the pre-anoxic level.
Thus, xylotrophic fungi there are extremophilic aerobic organisms, capable of development under low oxygen and prolonged anoxia as well as high carbon dioxide concentration, thanks to they have eco-physiological adaptations include microaerophilia, capnophilia and facultative anaerobiosis. These are three interrelated and interdependent adaptations of xylotrophic fungi to the gas mode of the woody habitat and if some of them are absent it reduces the adaptive significance of the others and makes it impossible for the successful development of fungi in wood.
The gas mode of the woody habitat created by themselves, on the one hand, gives them competitive advantages over other groups of xylobiont organisms, and, on the other hand, is a selection factor for the accompanying organisms. So, low oxygen content and its absence contribute to the development of anaerobic bacteria in wood. Indirectly, this is indicated by methane emissions from decomposed xylotrophic fungi wood [26,27,28,29,30].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.A.M.; methodology, V.A.M., D.K.D.; validation, V.A.M., D.K.D.; formal analysis, D.K.D., V.A.M.; investigation, D.K.D., V.A.M.; resources, V.A.M., D.K.D.; writing—original draft preparation, V.A.M.; writing—review and editing V.A.M., D.K.D.; visualization D.K.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-24-00970.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which help to improve this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gilbertson, R.L. Wood-rotting fungi of North America. Mycologia 1980, 72, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stepanova, N.T.; Mukhin, V.A. Fundamentals of Wood-Decaying Fungi Ecology; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1979; 100p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Parmasto, E. On origin of the Hymenomycetes (What are corticioid fungi?). Windahlia 1986, 16, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Floudas, D.; Binder, M.; Riley, R.; Barry, K.; Blanchette, R.A.; Henrissat, B.; Martinez, A.T.; Otillar, R.; Spatafora, J.W.; Yadav, J.S.; et al. The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 2012, 336, 1715–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Henningsson, B. Physiology a decay activity of the birch conk fungus Polyporus betulinus (Bull.) Fr.; Studia Forestalia Suecica; Skogshögskolan: Stockholm, Sweden, 1965; Volume 34, 77p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Harmon, M.E.; Franklin, J.F.; Swanson, F.J.; Sollins, P.; Gregory, S.V.; Lattin, J.D.; Anderson, N.H.; Cline, S.P.; Aumen, N.G.; Sedell, J.R.; et al. Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1986, 15, 133–302. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dix, N.J.; Webster, J. Fungal Ecology; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1995; 549p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Watkinson, S.; Bebber, D.; Darrah, P.; Fricker, M.; Tlalka, M.; Boddy, L. The role of wood decay fungi in the carbon and nitrogen dynamics of the forest floor. In Fungi in Biogeochemical Cycles; Gadd, G., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 151–181. [Google Scholar]
  9. Isaev, A.S.; Korovin, G.N. Lesa Rossii i Kiotskii protocol (Russian forest and Kyoto protocol). In Vozmozhnosti Predotvrashcheniya Izmeneniya Klimata i Ego Negativnykh Posledstvii: Problema Kiotskogo Protokola: Materialy Soveta-Seminara pri Prezidente RAN (The Possibility of Preventing Climate Change and Its Negative Effects: The Problem of Kyoto Protocol: Seminar Materials at the President Russian Academy of Sciences); Izrael, Y.A., Ed.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2006; pp. 287–305. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kudeyarov, V.N.; Zavarzin, G.A.; Blagodatskii, S.A.; Borisov, A.V.; Voronin, P.Y.; Demkin, V.A.; Demkina, T.S.; Evdokimov, I.V.; Zamolodchikov, D.G.; Karelin, D.V.; et al. Puly i Potoki Ugleroda v Nazemnykh Ekosistemakh Rossii (Pools and Fluxes of Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems Russia); Zavarzin, G.A., Ed.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2007; 315p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Mukhin, V.A.; Diyarova, D.K.; Gitarskiy, M.L.; Zamolodchikov, D.G. Carbon and Oxygen Gas Exchange in Woody Debris: The Process and Climate-Related Drivers. Forests 2021, 12, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jensen, K.F. Oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in sound and decaying red oak trees. For. Sci. 1969, 15, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soloviev, V.A. Respiratory Gas Exchange of Wood; LGU: Leningrad, Russia, 1987; 300p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Hintikka, V.; Korhonen, K. Effects of carbon dioxide on the growth of lignicolous and soil-inhabiting Hymenomycetes. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 1970, 69, 5–29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Scheffer, T.C. O2 requirements for growth and survival of wood-decaying and sapwood-staining fungi. Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64, 1957–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tabak, H.H.; Cooke, W.B. The effects of gaseous environments on the growth and metabolism of fungi. Bot. Rev. 1968, 34, 126–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zadradžil, F. Influence of CO2 concentration on the mycelium growth of three Pleurotus species. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 1, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Highley, T.L.; Bar-Lev, S.S.; Kirk, T.K.; Larsen, M.J. Influence of O2 and CO2 wood decay by heartrot and saprot fungi. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tavzes, C.; Pohleven, F.; Koestler, R.J. Effect of anoxic conditions on wood-decay fungi treated with argon or nitrogen. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2001, 47, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seo, G.S.; Suzuki, A. Effect of concentrated carbon dioxide exposure on the mycelial growth and fruit body initiation of Ganoderma lucidum. J. Mushroom Sci. Prod. 2004, 2, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ryvarden, L.; Gilbertson, R.L. European Polypores. Pt. 1 (Abortiporus-Lindtneria); Fungiflora: Oslo, Norway, 1993; 387p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirk, P.M. Index Fungorum. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  23. Dudka, I.A.; Vasser, S.P.; Ellanskaya, I.A.; Koval, E.Z. Methods of Experimental Mycology; Naukova Dumka: Kiev, Russia, 1982; 552p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Unden, G. Aerobic respiration and regulation of aerobic/anaerobic metabolism. In Biology of the Prokaryotes; Lengeler, J.W., Drews, G., Schlegel, H.G., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 1999; pp. 261–277. [Google Scholar]
  25. Black, J. Microbiology: Principles and Explorations, 6th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; 920p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mukhin, V.; Voronin, P. Methane emission during wood fungal decomposition. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2007, 413, 159–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Keppler, F.; Hamilton, J.T.G.; Braß, M. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 2006, 439, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zavarzin, G.A.; Zavarzina, A.G. Xylotrophic and mycophilic bacteria in formation of dystrophic waters. Microbiology 2009, 78, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mukhortova, L.; Pashenova, N.; Meteleva, M.; Krivobokov, L.; Guggenberger, G. Temperature Sensitivity of CO2 and CH4 Fluxes from Coarse Woody Debris in Northern Boreal Forests. Forests 2021, 12, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Xue, Y.; Pan, B.; Xiao, L.; Wang, S.; Lever, M.; Hinrichs, K.-U.; Inagaki, F.; Liu, C. Methane Production by Facultative Anaerobic Wood-Rot Fungi via a New Halomethane-Dependent Pathway. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0170022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Daedaleopsis tricolor (a), D. septentrionalis (b), Fomitopsis pinicola (c), Hapalopilus rutilans (d), F. betulina (e), Fomes fomentarius (f), Trichaptum pargamenum (g); substrates: Pinus sylvestris (h), Betula pendula (i).
Figure 1. Daedaleopsis tricolor (a), D. septentrionalis (b), Fomitopsis pinicola (c), Hapalopilus rutilans (d), F. betulina (e), Fomes fomentarius (f), Trichaptum pargamenum (g); substrates: Pinus sylvestris (h), Betula pendula (i).
Jof 08 01296 g001
Figure 2. Dynamics of O2 consumption and CO2 accumulation in exposure chambers with basidiocarps Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) and substrates Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d). Dark columns—O2, light columns—CO2, R2—coefficient of determination.
Figure 2. Dynamics of O2 consumption and CO2 accumulation in exposure chambers with basidiocarps Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) and substrates Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d). Dark columns—O2, light columns—CO2, R2—coefficient of determination.
Jof 08 01296 g002
Figure 3. O2 concentration (1) and intensity of its consumption (2) by Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) basidiocarps and Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d) substrates. R2—coefficient of determination.
Figure 3. O2 concentration (1) and intensity of its consumption (2) by Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) basidiocarps and Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d) substrates. R2—coefficient of determination.
Jof 08 01296 g003
Figure 4. CO2 concentration (1) and intensity of its emission (2) by Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) basidiocarps and Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d) substrates. R2—coefficient of determination.
Figure 4. CO2 concentration (1) and intensity of its emission (2) by Fomes fomentarius (a), Fomitopsis pinicola (b) basidiocarps and Fomes fomentarius (c), Fomitopsis betulina (d) substrates. R2—coefficient of determination.
Jof 08 01296 g004
Figure 5. Growth of dikaryotic mycelium of Daedaleopsis septentrionalis in 100% CO2 (a) and in 100% N2 (b). I—initial size, II—after 3 days exposure in oxygen-free medium, III—after the next 3 days in air; control in air (c), initial size (I), after 3 (II) and 6 (III) days in air.
Figure 5. Growth of dikaryotic mycelium of Daedaleopsis septentrionalis in 100% CO2 (a) and in 100% N2 (b). I—initial size, II—after 3 days exposure in oxygen-free medium, III—after the next 3 days in air; control in air (c), initial size (I), after 3 (II) and 6 (III) days in air.
Jof 08 01296 g005
Table 1. Ratio CO2 emission and O2 consumption by basidiocarps and substrates at 5/10/20% O2 in nitrogen.
Table 1. Ratio CO2 emission and O2 consumption by basidiocarps and substrates at 5/10/20% O2 in nitrogen.
SpeciesSubstratesBasidiocarps
Daedaleopsis tricolor07/0.7/0.90.8/0.8/0.8
Fomes fomentarius1.1/0.7/0.90.9/0.8/0.9
Fomitopsis betulina0.9/0.7/0.91.0/1.1/0.9
Table 2. Emission CO2 (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates at 5/10/20% O2 in nitrogen.
Table 2. Emission CO2 (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates at 5/10/20% O2 in nitrogen.
SpeciesSubstratesBasidiocarps
Daedaleopsis tricolor0.4/0.3/0.30.1/0.2/0.2
Fomes fomentarius1.2/1.2/1.22.5/2.7/2.5
Fomitopsis betulina0.4/0.2/0.41.4/1.5/1.3
Table 3. Ratio CO2 emission and O2 consumption by basidiocarps and substrates at 0.04/5/10/20% CO2 in the air.
Table 3. Ratio CO2 emission and O2 consumption by basidiocarps and substrates at 0.04/5/10/20% CO2 in the air.
SpeciesSubstratesBasidiocarps
Daedaleopsis tricolor0.8/07/0.8/2.00.8/0.8/0.8/3.8
Fomes fomentarius0.9/0.7/1.1/2.30.8/0.8/0.7/3.1
Fomitopsis betulina0.8/1.0/0.5/2.20.8/0.9/0.6/1.2
Table 4. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates at 0.04/5/10/20% CO2 in the air.
Table 4. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates at 0.04/5/10/20% CO2 in the air.
SpeciesSubstratesBasidiocarps
Daedaleopsis tricolor0.7/1.3/1.4/0.60.6/0.4/0.6/0.1
Fomes fomentarius3.4/3.0/3.7/0.92.2/2.8 /1.9/1.3
Fomitopsis betulina0.7/0.6/1.2/0.20.4/ 0.8/0.8/0.3
Table 5. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by Daedaleopsis tricolor basidiocarps and substrates in air before and after 72 h exposure in chambers with 100% CO2 concentration, n = 3.
Table 5. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by Daedaleopsis tricolor basidiocarps and substrates in air before and after 72 h exposure in chambers with 100% CO2 concentration, n = 3.
Subject of StudyGas Exchange
Before ExposureAfter Exposure
Substrates0.59 ± 0.070.46 ± 0.06 (p = 0.19)
Basidiocarps0.88 ± 0.010.79 ± 0.03 (p = 0.07)
Note: p—the test for significance of differences (ANOVA).
Table 6. Growth rate (mm/day) of dikaryotic mycelium Daedaleopsis septentrionalis on wort agar in oxygen-free and air media, n = 3.
Table 6. Growth rate (mm/day) of dikaryotic mycelium Daedaleopsis septentrionalis on wort agar in oxygen-free and air media, n = 3.
Gaseous Medium3 Days in Oxygen-Free Medium3 Days in Air, after
Oxygen-Free Medium
CO23.58 ± 0.51 (p = 0.01) *4.25 ± 1.32 (p = 0.66) **
N27.31 ± 0.50 (p = 0.26) *5.59 ± 0.55 (p = 0.08) **
Air (control)8.57 ± 0.886.2 ± 0.84 (p = 0.19) **
Note: significance of differences *—with control, **—with the previous period.
Table 7. Emission CO2 (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates in the air and in oxygen-free nitrogen medium.
Table 7. Emission CO2 (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates in the air and in oxygen-free nitrogen medium.
SpeciesBefore Exposure
in Air
Exposure in Oxygen-Free
Medium, h
162145
Fomes fomentarius0.26/0.78 *0.21/0.230.21/0.200.22/0.22
Hapalopilus rutilans1.39/0.29 *0.35/0.150.31/0.080.22/0.09
Trichaptum biforme1.04 **0.260.270.23
Fomitopsis betulina0.18 **0.110.170.13
Note: *—basidiocarps/substrates; **—substrates.
Table 8. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates in the air before and after three-day exposure in oxygen-free nitrogen medium, n = 4.
Table 8. O2 consumption (vol. %/h) by basidiocarps and substrates in the air before and after three-day exposure in oxygen-free nitrogen medium, n = 4.
SpeciesSubject of
Study
Gas Exchange
Before Exposure
in Air
After Exposure in Oxygen-Free Medium
Daedaleopsis tricolorsubstrate0.40 ± 0.010.24 ± 0.01 (p = 0.001) *
D. tricolorbasidiocarp0.25 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.01 (p = 0.001)
Fomitopsis betulinasubstrat0.87 ± 0.100.68 ± 0.04 (p = 0.13)
F. betulinabasidiocarp0.59 ± 0.050.39 ± 0.01 (p = 0.01)
Fomes fomentariussubstrat1.05 ± 0.020.86 ± 0.01 (p = 0.001)
F. fomentariusbasidiocarp1.11 ± 0.061.11 ± 0.05 (p = 0.99)
Note: p—the test for significance of differences (ANOVA).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukhin, V.A.; Diyarova, D.K. Eco-Physiological Adaptations of the Xylotrophic Basidiomycetes Fungi to CO2 and O2 Mode in the Woody Habitat. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121296

AMA Style

Mukhin VA, Diyarova DK. Eco-Physiological Adaptations of the Xylotrophic Basidiomycetes Fungi to CO2 and O2 Mode in the Woody Habitat. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(12):1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukhin, Victor A., and Daria K. Diyarova. 2022. "Eco-Physiological Adaptations of the Xylotrophic Basidiomycetes Fungi to CO2 and O2 Mode in the Woody Habitat" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 12: 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8121296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop