Next Article in Journal
Hydrophobin CmHYD1 Is Involved in Conidiation, Infection and Primordium Formation, and Regulated by GATA Transcription Factor CmAreA in Edible Fungus, Cordyceps militaris
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression and Purification along with Evaluation of Serological Response and Diagnostic Potential of Recombinant Sap2 Protein from C. parapsilosis for Use in Systemic Candidiasis
Previous Article in Journal
Fungal Pathogen Emergence: Investigations with an Ustilago maydis × Sporisorium reilianum Hybrid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamics and Predictors of Mortality Due to Candidemia Caused by Different Candida Species: Comparison of Intensive Care Unit-Associated Candidemia (ICUAC) and Non-ICUAC
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiology of Candidemia in Kuwait: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study

1
Microbiology Department, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya 46300, Kuwait
2
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait
3
Microbiology Department, Ibn-Sina Hospital, Shuwaikh 70031, Kuwait
4
Microbiology Department, Maternity Hospital, Shuwaikh 70031, Kuwait
5
Microbiology Department, Amiri Hospital, Sharq 15300, Kuwait
6
Microbiology Department, Farwaniya Hospital, Farwaniya 13373, Kuwait
7
Microbiology Department, Al-Sabah Hospital, Shuwaikh 70031, Kuwait
8
Microbiology Department, Adan Hospital, Hadiya 47000, Kuwait
9
Microbiology Department, Jahra Hospital, Jahra 01753, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(8), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080673
Submission received: 29 July 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 18 August 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasive Fungal Infections 2021)

Abstract

:
The Candida species cause a majority of invasive fungal infections. In this article, we describe the nationwide epidemiology of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018. Yeast bloodstream isolates submitted from all major hospitals and identified by phenotypic MALDI-TOF MS and/or by molecular methods were studied. Susceptibility testing was performed by Etest. Out of 313 bloodstream yeasts, 239 Candida spp. isolates (excluding duplicate isolates) were obtained during 234 candidemic episodes among 223 patients. Mixed-species candidemia and re-infection occurred in 5 and 11 patients, respectively. C. albicans (n = 74), C. parapsilosis (n = 54), C. tropicalis (n = 35), C. auris (n = 33), C. glabrata (n = 32), other Candida spp. (n = 11), and other yeasts (n = 9) caused fungemia. Nearly 50% of patients were in intensive care units. Candida spp. isolates (except C. glabrata) were susceptible to caspofungin and 27% of C. auris were amphotericin B-resistant. Resistance to fluconazole was 100% in C. auris, 17% in C. parapsilosis, 12% in C. glabrata, and 1% in C. albicans. Mortality was 47% for other Candida/yeast infections. Nationwide candidemia incidence in 2018 was 5.29 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Changes in species spectrum, increasing fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis, and the emergence of C. auris as a major pathogen in Kuwait are noteworthy findings. The data could be of help in informing decisions regarding planning, in the allocation of resources, and in antimicrobial stewardship.

1. Introduction

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have increased significantly in the last few decades, coinciding with a concomitant increase in the population of immunocompromised/immunosuppressed individuals [1,2]. The spectrum of fungi causing IFIs is changing due to changes in clinical practice [3]. Candida infections constitute a major component of healthcare-associated IFIs and are associated with 20–40% of all-cause mortality, with an attributable mortality of 15–35% in adults and 10–15% in neonates [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Nearly 50% of episodes of candidemia occur in intensive care units (ICUs) and contribute towards prolonged hospital stay and considerable health expenditures [10,11].
Previous epidemiological studies have shown that nearly 90% of all Candida infections are caused by only four species/species complexes, which include Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata [8,12,13,14]. Among Candida species, C. albicans is considered the most pathogenic and the most frequent cause of candidemia worldwide [15,16]. However, the past two decades have seen a gradual change in the spectrum of species causing candidemia, so much so that >50% of candidemia cases are now caused by non-albicans Candida species, which mainly include C. glabrata complex members, C. parapsilosis complex members, and C. tropicalis as well as many emerging pathogens, likely as a result of the increasing use of fluconazole or other antifungal drugs for prophylaxis or therapy [6,14,17,18]. Candida non-albicans species are associated with even higher rates of mortality and a higher frequency of resistance to antifungal drugs than what is seen with C. albicans infections [6,7,14,19,20,21]. More recently, the emergence and rapid spreading of the often multidrug-resistant Candida auris has dramatically changed the epidemiology of candidemia at many geographical locations/health care facilities as it has become the most common or one of the more common causes of invasive Candida infections [22].
The annual incidence of candidemia is quite variable in different populations and age groups, with C. albicans causing most infections in younger (<18 years old) patients and C. glabrata infections occurring more frequently among the elderly (>60 years old) [8,17,23,24,25]. The distribution of candidemia cases caused by major Candida spp. also varies in population-based studies carried out in different countries/geographical settings [6,8,17,23]. Although C. albicans is the most frequently isolated species, the number of candidemia cases caused by C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis vary considerably, while C. auris has recently become a major pathogen in some healthcare facilities/geographical locations [5,6,7,8,17,22,23]. C. glabrata is the second, while C. parapsilosis is the third most frequently isolated species from candidemia patients in North America, Australia, and some European countries [5,6,7,8,17,23]. The isolation frequency of C. glabrata is particularly higher from patients who are critically ill, have diabetes or exposure to azoles, or have a solid organ transplant or a solid tumor [5,6,8,17,24]. C. parapsilosis is the second most frequently isolated species from candidemia patients in Spain, Latin America, and Africa, and its isolation frequency is higher from patients with indwelling catheters, parenteral nutrition, or prior exposure to antifungal drugs or corticosteroids [6,8,14,17,24]. C. parapsilosis invasive infections are more common in younger individuals, and nearly 34% of all neonatal Candida infections worldwide are caused by C. parapsilosis [6,8,26]. C. tropicalis invasive infections are more common in some Asian settings/countries and patients with these infections are more likely to have hematologic malignancy, neutropenia, or exposure to corticosteroids [6,8,17,24]. C. auris has caused invasive infections and outbreaks in more than 45 countries worldwide and unlike other Candida spp., which predominantly originate from the gastrointestinal tract, it readily colonizes the skin, is shed into the environment, and is easily transmitted to other hospitalized patients [8,22]. C. auris mostly causes invasive infections in older, critically ill patients with indwelling catheters, multiple comorbidities, and prolonged hospitalization [27,28]. Although many epidemiologic studies on invasive Candida infections have been performed, only a few nationwide studies have determined the incidence of candidemia [6,14,29]. This retrospective study determined the countrywide incidence of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018. The study also identified different Candida species that cause bloodstream infections and their resistance to commonly used antifungal drugs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Candidemia Surveillance and Incidence of Candidemia in Kuwait

This retrospective, laboratory-based study performed a nationwide surveillance of candidemia cases in Kuwait from 1 January to 31 December 2018. The study collected data from 8 major and 4 tertiary care hospitals (representing all government hospitals where candidemia patients are treated in Kuwait) that routinely submit Candida and other yeast bloodstream isolates to the Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) for species-specific identification and antifungal drug susceptibility testing. Until the year 2018, all governmental hospitals were distributed over six major medical areas around the country, namely: Capital (central, sea side), Hawally (central, east side), Jahra (north), Ahmadi (south), Farwaniya (central), and the specialized Al-Sabah (central, north side) medical areas. Each major hospital is located in a different medical area, while the tertiary care hospitals are located in the specialized Al-Sabah medical area. The number of hospital beds, catchment area, and various specialties available in these hospitals are shown in Table 1.
Patients’ demographic data and the location of care at the onset of candidemia (or fungemia for other yeasts) were also recorded. The blood samples were obtained from each patient after obtaining verbal consent only as part of routine patient care and diagnostic work-up. For each patient, the first blood culture isolate growing the Candida species during the study period indicated an episode of candidemia. Positive blood cultures yielding the same Candida species within 30 days of the first isolation were attributed to the same candidemia episode and were not included. Recurrent candidemia (re-infection) was defined as a positive blood culture occurring at least one month after the previous episode of candidemia. Mixed candidemia cases indicated the presence of more than one Candida species during the same episode. The data on the total population of Kuwait in 2018 were obtained from the Public Authority for Civil Information (https://www.csb.gov.kw/Pages/Statistics_en?ID=67&ParentCatID=1, accessed on 14 July 2021) and was used to determine the candidemia incidence (candidemia cases/100,000 population) in Kuwait.

2.2. Isolation and Species-Specific Identification of Yeast Isolates

The microbiology laboratories of all government hospitals use automated blood culture systems, including BACTEC 9240 (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA), BacT/Alert 3D (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’E’toile, France), and/or Versa TREKTM240 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for the isolation of yeasts from blood specimens. All growth-positive blood cultures received in the MRL were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar and Mast ID-CHROMagar Candida (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK) for phenotypic colony characteristics, as described previously [30]. Species-specific identification was achieved through assimilation profiles obtained by commercial VITEK 2 yeast identification system and/or through protein profiles by MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK® MS) (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), as described previously [31,32]. A multiplex PCR assay was used to differentiate C. parapsilosis sensu stricto from C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis, as described previously [33]. PCR amplification of rDNA was used to confirm the identification of all C. auris and C. lusitaniae isolates by using species-specific primers, as described previously [30,34]. The identity of selected isolates and other isolates which showed unusual phenotypic characteristics and/or resistance to antifungal drugs was confirmed by PCR sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA by using panfungal primers, as described previously [35].

2.3. Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Testing (AST) and the Molecular Basis of Drug Resistance

The in vitro susceptibility to four (fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin) antifungal drugs was determined by using Etest strips (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and the data were interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as reference strains for the purpose of quality control. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were interpreted as susceptible, intermediate/susceptible dose-dependent, or resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints (supplement M60) [36]. If an isolate scored as resistant or intermediate to caspofungin, it was also tested against micafungin to confirm the results. Due to the lack of defined breakpoints, isolates showing an MIC ≤ 1.0 μg/mL for amphotericin B were taken as wild-type, and isolates with MIC > 1 μg/mL were scored as non-wild-type [37]. Since there are no established C. auris-specific susceptibility breakpoints, tentative MIC breakpoints of ≥32 µg/mL for fluconazole, ≥2 µg/mL for voriconazole, ≥4 µg/mL for caspofungin, and ≥2 µg/mL for amphotericin B (Etest MIC of 1.5 µg/mL was rounded off to 2.0 µg/mL), based on expert opinion, were used [22,38].
The molecular basis of resistance to fluconazole in C. albicans isolates was determined by sequence analysis of the ERG11 gene. The complete ERG11 gene (1578 bp) and the flanking 5′ and 3′ regions were amplified as 5 overlapping fragments and sequenced. The N-terminal fragment, internal fragments 1, 2, and 3, and the C-terminal fragment were amplified and sequenced by using the CalERG11F1 + CalERG11R1, CalERG11F2 + CalERG11R2, CalERG11F3 + CalERG11R3, CalERG11F4 + CalERG11R4, and CalERG11F5 + CalERG11R5 primers (Table 2), respectively, with the reaction and cycling conditions, as described previously [39].
The complete ERG11 sequence was assembled and compared with the reference sequence from the fluconazole-susceptible C. albicans strain SC5314 (GenBank accession no. X13296). The presence of the Y132F mutation in ERG11 in C. parapsilosis or the presence of the Y132F or K143R mutation in ERG11 in C. auris isolates was determined, as described previously [39,40]. The C. glabrata isolate, which showed reduced susceptibility to caspofungin by Etest was analyzed for hotspot-1 (HS-1) mutations in the FKS1 and FKS2 genes [41]. The HS-1 regions of the FKS1 and FKS2 genes were amplified and sequenced, as described previously [41].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The incidence of candidemia was calculated as the number of candidemia cases per 1,000,000 population. Patients’ demographic data and other variables were compared by the Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Statistical analyses were carried out by using WinPepi software ver. 11.65 (PEPI for Windows, Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). A p value < 0.05 with the use of a two-tailed test was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Epidemiology of Candidemia in Kuwait in 2018

A total of 313 bloodstream yeast isolates were submitted to MRL from January to December 2018. Excluding duplicate isolates and non-Candida yeasts, 239 Candida spp. isolates were obtained during 234 candidemic episodes among 223 patients. The demographic details and the hospital unit housing the candidemia patients in 8 major and 4 tertiary care hospitals are shown in Table 3. The number of male patients (n = 122) was slightly higher than females (n = 100) (Table 1). Age distribution was bimodal, mainly involving extremes of age as neonates/infants (<1-year old, n = 51) and senior citizens (≥65 years old, n = 87) were the dominant age groups. The nationality data were available for only 65 patients and included 55 Kuwaiti nationals and 10 non-Kuwaiti patients (2 patients from Saudi Arabia and 1 patient each from United Arab Emirates, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka). Nearly half (n = 119) of the patients were in the ICU, but their proportion was significantly different among the hospitals (Table 1). All neonates/infants in the Maternity Hospital were in the neonatal ICUs. Excluding the Adan, Jahra, and Farwaniya hospitals, which also have maternity wards and neonatal ICUs, the number of patients located in the ICU was lower in Amiri Hospital or significantly lower (p < 0.05) in Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital compared to the number of candidemia patients in Al-Sabah Hospital or Ibn-Sina Hospital (Table 3). The incidence of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018 was determined as 5.29 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (234 candidemia episodes/4.42 million inhabitants). The incidence was slightly higher in females (6.18/100,000) than in males (4.71/100,000). The highest incidence was detected among infants/neonates (89.1/100,000), followed by the elderly (≥65-year-old group) (62.46/100,000), the 50–64-year-old group (3.81/100,000), and the >1–19-year-old group (1.99/100,000); the lowest incidence (1.69/100,000) was found in the 20–49-year-old group. Nearly 10% of the affected neonates were twins.
The spectrum of Candida spp. isolated during 234 candidemia episodes are shown in Table 4. Candidemia due to two species (C. albicans + C. tropicalis, n = 3; C. albicans + C. parapsilosis, n = 1; and C. glabrata + C. krusei, n = 1) occurred simultaneously in five patients. Eleven patients experienced re-infection at least 30 days after the onset of the first candidemic event; eight patients had re-infection with the same species (C. auris, n = 3; C. parapsilosis, n = 2; C. tropicalis, n = 2; and C. glabrata, n = 1), while three patients had re-infection with a different species (C. krusei followed by C. glabrata, n = 1; C. albicans followed by C. auris, n = 1; and C. glabrata followed by C. auris, n = 1). Among 239 Candida bloodstream isolates, C. albicans was detected in 74 out of 239 (31%) isolates and affected patients of all age groups (Table 4). C. albicans infections occurred either alone (n = 69) or as mixed infection (n = 4) or as initial infection, followed by re-infection with C. auris (n = 1). C. parapsilosis (54 of 239, 22.6%), C. tropicalis (35 of 239, 14.6%), C. auris (33 of 239, 13.8%), and C. glabrata (32 of 239, 13.4%) were the second, third, fourth, and fifth most frequently isolated species, respectively. Other Candida species were isolated from 11 patients, including one patient co-infected with C. krusei and C. glabrata. The isolation frequency of C. albicans from neonates/infants was higher than C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata, and significantly higher (p < 0.05) than C. tropicalis and C. auris. C. parapsilosis (n = 54) was the most dominant non-albicans Candida species; similar to C. albicans and C. tropicalis, it was also isolated from all age groups. More importantly, C. auris was the fourth most common cause of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018, surpassing C. glabrata, and its isolation frequency among older (≥65 years old) patients was significantly higher than C. albicans (p = 0.001).
The isolation frequency of Candida spp. from candidemia patients in all eight major and four tertiary care hospitals was also analyzed with respect to their point of care; the data are presented in Table 5. C. albicans was mostly (48 of 74, 64.9%) isolated from patients in the ICUs and was the dominant species (18 of 37, 48.6%) in Maternity Hospital as well as in Adan Hospital (15 of 38, 39.5%), with the latter also including maternity wards and neonatal ICUs catering mainly to the southern governorates within Kuwait. C. parapsilosis was the dominant species in only one major (Mubarak Al-Kabeer) hospital, while C. tropicalis was most frequently isolated from patients in two major (Amiri and Ibn-Sina) hospitals. More interestingly, in 2018, C. auris emerged as the dominant species in two major (Al-Sabah, 14 of 24, 58.3% and Farwaniya, 11 of 36, 27.8%) hospitals in Kuwait, surpassing even C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Nine patients had fungemia due to other (Cyberlindnera fabianii, n = 4; Magnusiomyces capitatus, n = 2; Kodamaea ohmeri, n = 1; Lodderomyces elongisporus, n = 1; and Rhodotorula minuta, n = 1) yeast species.

3.2. AST Data and Molecular Basis of Antifungal Drug Resistance

The AST data against four (amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin) commonly used antifungal drugs for the five common Candida spp. are presented in Table 6. All C. tropicalis isolates were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs, while only one C. albicans isolate was resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole. Resistance to fluconazole among C. parapsilosis was high, as 9 of 54 (16.7%) isolates were resistant to this drug. As expected, many C. parapsilosis isolates also exhibited reduced susceptibility to caspofungin, but the MIC values were within the susceptible range. All C. auris isolates (n = 33) appeared susceptible to caspofungin (MIC range of 0.016–0.5 µg/mL) but were uniformly resistant to fluconazole, while six (18.1%) isolates were additionally resistant to voriconazole. Resistance to amphotericin B was also detected in 9 of 33 (27.3%) isolates. Resistance to fluconazole was also detected in 4 of 32 (12.5%) C. glabrata isolates. All four isolates also showed higher MIC (>0.5 µg/mL) to voriconazole and were considered resistant [14]. One C. glabrata isolate was intermediate to caspofungin and also showed reduced susceptibility (MIC of 0.095 µg/mL) to micafungin by Etest.
PCR sequencing data showed that the fluconazole-resistant C. albicans isolate (Kw150/8/18) contained two nonsynonymous mutations (T123I and Y132H) in addition to a few synonymous mutations in ERG11. Fluconazole resistance-conferring mutations (Y132F or K143R) in ERG11 were detected in C. auris isolates. PCR sequencing studies of the HS-1 of the FKS1 and FKS2 genes showed that the C. glabrata isolate (Kw154/7/18), with reduced susceptibility to echinocandins, contained an S663P mutation in the HS-1 of FKS2.

3.3. AST Data of Other Candida/Yeast Species, Clinical Details of Patients, Treatment, and Outcome

The AST data of 11 other Candida spp. and 9 other yeast species isolates are presented in Table 7. All four C. krusei isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility/resistance to fluconazole but were susceptible to voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. Three C. lusitaniae and one C. dubliniensis isolates were uniformly susceptible to all four antifungal drugs (Table 7). Similarly, C. blankii, C. guilliermondii, and C. pelliculosa isolates were also susceptible to voriconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin but showed reduced susceptibility to fluconazole. Among nine other yeast species isolates, all C. fabianii (n = 4) and L. elongisporus were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs. Both M. capitatus isolates showed resistance to caspofungin, with one isolate also showing reduced susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B. Both K. ohmeri and R. minuta isolates were resistant to fluconazole, with R. minuta showing additional resistance to caspofungin (Table 7).
Fifteen of 20 patients with candidemia caused by other Candida/yeast species were admitted into the ICUs and their age varied from 5 days to 85 years (Table 7). The treatment details and outcome were available for 8 of 11 candidemia patients infected with other Candida species, and for 7 of 9 fungemia patients infected with other yeast species (Table 7). All three neonates infected with C. lusitaniae and one neonate with C. pelliculosa were successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B alone, or with liposomal amphotericin B followed by caspofungin (Table 7). Similarly, one infant with C. blankii candidemia was also successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B (Table 7). Overall, 2 of 8 (25%) patients infected with other Candida spp. died, including one patient co-infected with C. krusei and C. glabrata (Table 7). On the contrary, 5 of 7 (71.4%) fungemia patients due to rare yeast species died, including one patient who had received only a single dose of an antifungal drug and four patients in whom treatment was not even initiated as they succumbed to infection even before the culture produced a positive result (Table 7).

4. Discussion

Candidemia is the most common form of invasive candidiasis; however, it only represents nearly 75% of all invasive Candida infections. Furthermore, nearly 30% of all invasive Candida infections do not yield a positive blood culture [8,23,45]. Although the impact of candidemia and invasive candidiasis on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs is substantial, studies on candidemia on a population-based scale are challenging [6,8,9,10,14,46,47,48]. In this study, we determined the nationwide incidence of candidemia, the spectrum of Candida species, and their susceptibility to antifungal drugs in Kuwait in 2018. Kuwait is a small country located in the northwest portion of the Arabian Gulf in the Middle East. The country has a largely urban population that lives in the sprawling Kuwait City, with its suburbs divided into several governorates and two smaller towns nearly 45 Km away from Kuwait City; Ahmadi is located in the south and Jahra is located in the west. The total population of nearly 4.4 million individuals in 2018 comprised 1.34 million Kuwaiti nationals and 3.08 million expatriate workers or their dependents, mainly originating from south-southeast Asian, Middle Eastern, and African countries [49,50]. The expatriate work force in Kuwait in 2018 mostly comprised younger adults. Thus, the contribution of 30–59-year-old expatriate individuals was >68% of their total population, while the corresponding value for Kuwaiti nationals was ~31% (https://www.csb.gov.kw/Pages/Statistics_en?ID=67&ParentCatID=1, accessed on 14 July 2021). There are eight major and four tertiary care government hospitals located within a distance of ~45 Km from Kuwait City [51,52], which are where candidemia patients are diagnosed and treated in Kuwait.
Our nationwide data on the incidence of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018 showed that 234 candidemic episodes occurred in 223 patients. The incidence of candidemia in Kuwait in 2018 was determined as 5.29 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, which is closer to the incidence in Israel and many European countries but lower than that reported from the United States of America (USA) [23,24,29,53,54]. A similar incidence rate has also been estimated for other nearby countries in the Middle East region [47]. Although most European countries have reported an incidence of candidemia between 1.4 and 5.7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, Spain (8.1 cases per 100,000) and Denmark (>10 cases/100,000) have reported incidence values which are nearly 2–3 times that of the European average [8,23,24,46,55,56]. Similarly, studies from the USA have also reported higher incidence values, with a total of ≥7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants [23,24,54,57]. Epidemiological studies from China (26 cases per 100,000 hospital admissions compared to 90 cases per 100,000 patients in the USA) have also reported incidence values which are comparable to the data from Kuwait and European countries [23,24,58,59,60]. One study from Thailand, however, reported a higher incidence rate of 13.3 per 100,000 individuals [61]. The highest incidence rate of 89.1 cases per 100,000 was detected among neonates/infants, followed by 62.46 cases per 100,000 for the elderly (≥65 years old) in Kuwait, while the data from the USA showed the highest incidence rate of 20.1 cases per 100,000 among the elderly [54]. Only Spain has previously reported a higher incidence rate than Kuwait (96.4 cases per 100,000) for invasive candidiasis among children <1-year old [55], while Scotland has reported an incidence rate of 55.9 cases per 100,000 inhabitants among the elderly (≥65 years old), which is comparable to Kuwait [62]. Other European countries and the USA have reported incidence rates among children <1-year old or the elderly that were only 2–5 times higher than the national average [23,24,54]. This large difference between the total incidence rate and the incidence rate among neonates/infants or the elderly is likely due to the large number of 30-year-olds to 59-year-olds, mostly physically fit expatriate workers in Kuwait. This is consistent with the observations that the incidence of candidemia is dependent upon many factors such as the reference (total population, hospital admissions, or ICU admissions) used, the age of the patients (particularly the number of patients at the extremes of age), the overall health of the total population, and the number of patients with malignancies, transplants, or abdominal surgery [8,23].
Species distribution among candidemia patients showed that C. albicans was the predominant species but accounted for only 74 of 239 (31%) of all Candida spp. isolates, followed by C. parapsilosis (54 of 239, 22.6%) and C. tropicalis (35 of 239, 14.6%). The data showed that the contribution of C. albicans is steadily declining in Kuwait; from a high of 56% during the period of 1994–1998 to 41.8% between 2006 and 2011, and further to 33.1% during the period of 2012–2017 [18]. This decline continued in 2018 as well. A similar trend has also been noted in many other countries where non-albicans Candida species now account for the majority of invasive Candida infections [8,14,23,24,48,63]. On the contrary, one study from South Korea reported an increasing trend in the incidence of C. albicans candidemia in recent years [64]. The second most common Candida species isolated from patients with invasive candidiasis varies with geographical locations and is identified as C. parapsilosis in Latin/South America and many European and Middle Eastern countries, or as C. glabrata in North America, or as C. tropicalis in east/southeast Asian countries [8,14,23,24,65]. More recent studies have shown that C. tropicalis has now surpassed C. albicans as the predominant Candida species among candidemia patients in some south-southeast Asian countries [8,66,67]. An important finding of our study was the emergence of C. auris as the fourth most common Candida species isolated from candidemia patients, replacing C. glabrata and its emergence as the predominant species in two major (Al-Sabah and Farwaniya) hospitals in Kuwait. Furthermore, its isolation frequency among older (>65 years old) patients was higher than C. glabrata or C. tropicalis or C. parapsilosis, and significantly higher than C. albicans. The emergence of C. auris as a major bloodstream pathogen has dramatically changed the epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in many countries in recent years [22]. Unlike other Candida species, C. auris has caused major outbreaks in many healthcare centers around the world [22]. C. auris has now emerged as the predominant yeast pathogen in many healthcare centers and geographical locations [68,69,70,71].
Consistent with our previous studies [18,32], resistance to antifungal drugs among bloodstream C. albicans and C. tropicalis isolates was rare as only 1 of 74 C. albicans isolates exhibited in vitro resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole only. While the rate of resistance to fluconazole among C. albicans isolates in Kuwait is comparable to the worldwide data, fluconazole resistance among global C. tropicalis isolates is more common, particularly among isolates from east/southeast Asian countries [8,14,67]. The only triazole-resistant C. albicans isolate (Kw150/8/18) detected in this study contained two nonsynonymous (T123I and Y132H) mutations in ERG11, which are well-known to confer resistance of C. albicans to fluconazole [72]. Resistance of C. parapsilosis to fluconazole appears to be increasing consistently in Kuwait as 9 of 54 (16.7%) isolates in 2018 were resistant to this drug. Previously, only 1 of 310 (0.3%) and 21 of 446 (4.7%) C. parapsilosis isolates recovered in Kuwait during the periods from 2006 to 2011 and from 2012 to 2017, respectively, were detected as fluconazole-resistant strains [18]. Molecular genetic studies have shown that only ~40% of fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis isolates in Kuwait contain ERG11 mutations, while the molecular basis of resistance in the remaining isolates remained unclear [39].
Consistent with previous reports [40,73], fluconazole resistance-conferring mutations (Y132F or K143R) in ERG11 were also detected in the C. auris isolates described in this study. Although 31 C. glabrata isolates were susceptible, one isolate was intermediate to caspofungin. The latter isolate (Kw154/7/18) also exhibited reduced susceptibility to micafungin (MIC of 0.095 µg/mL) by Etest. PCR sequencing studies identified the S663P mutation in the HS-1 of FKS2. Clinical C. glabrata isolates are usually highly susceptible to micafungin (MIC values ≤ 0.03 µg/mL by both Etest and the broth microdilution-bases EUCAST method) [41,74]. This is the first report of the isolation of a bloodstream C. glabrata isolate in Kuwait showing reduced susceptibility to echinocandins and carrying the S663P mutation in the HS-1 of FKS2. Previously, the S663P mutation in the HS-1 of FKS2 was only detected among non-blood (mainly urine) C. glabrata isolates from Kuwait [41]. Although the treatment history and outcome of infection were not available for this patient, our results support previous findings that FKS mutations are a better predictor of non-susceptibility of C. glabrata to echinocandins as compared to Etest [41,75].
Among 11 other Candida spp. isolates, C. lusitaniae isolates were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs tested, while isolates of C. krusei, C. blankii, C. guilliermondii, and C. pelliculosa exhibited reduced susceptibility to fluconazole but were susceptible to caspofungin, which is consistent with data reported in other studies [14,18,34,76,77]. Among other yeast species, L. elongisporus and C. fabianii isolates were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs, while R. minuta and M. capitatus isolates showed non-susceptibility to fluconazole and caspofungin. These data are also consistent with recent observations showing that rare Candida/yeast species exhibit non-susceptibility to antifungal drugs, including echinocandins [78,79,80].
The treatment details and outcome were available for 8 of 11 patients with other Candida and for 7 of 9 patients with rare yeast infections. Although the overall mortality among patients infected with other Candida/yeast species was 47%, higher mortality (71%) was seen among patients infected with rare yeast species. One of 2 patients with C. krusei infection died. This patient was also co-infected with C. glabrata. A higher mortality rate has been observed in candidemia patients infected with C. krusei as compared to those infected with C. albicans, C. tropicalis, or C. parapsilosis [81,82]. All three patients infected with C. lusitaniae were neonates who were successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B, with/without additional treatment with caspofungin. The findings are similar to data reported for candidemia due to C. lusitaniae among neonates in Kuwait in a previous study [34]. Similarly, the neonate and infant infected with C. pelliculosa and C. blankii [42], respectively, were also successfully treated with liposomal amphotericin B. Amphotericin B has also been previously used successfully for the treatment of C. pelliculosa candidemia patients [83,84], while fluconazole treatment for C. blankii fungemia was not very effective (45% mortality) according to a recent study from India [85]. One of 3 fungemia patients infected with C. fabianii died even before culture results were obtained and treatment could begin, while all four patients infected with other rare yeasts expired, including three patients in whom blood cultures subsequently produced a positive result. A 20% mortality rate was also recently reported in an outbreak among neonates due to C. fabianii in Kuwait [86]. An overall mortality rate of 71% was seen among patients infected with rare yeast species. Our data are consistent with recent reports showing that fungemia due to rare yeast pathogens in both pediatric and adult patients is usually associated with mortality rates higher than those seen with common Candida species, particularly among patients receiving echinocandin therapy [82,87,88].
Our study has a few limitations. The candidemia incidence values described in this study were calculated based on the blood cultures received in the MRL. Since some blood cultures may not have been sent from individual hospitals to MRL, the actual candidemia incidence in Kuwait may be slightly higher. The antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by the Etest and not via the reference broth microdilution method. The clinical details, including the nationality, antifungal treatment given, and the outcome were not available for many patients.
In conclusion, the incidence of candidemia for the whole population of Kuwait was determined and was found to be 5.29 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. However, the incidence of candidemia showed wide variations among different population sections, with the highest incidence reported among neonates/infants, followed by the elderly (≥65 years old) subjects, while the lowest incidence was found among the 20–49-year-old group, largely due to the high number of younger and healthier expatriate workers in the country. Only 74 of 239 (31%) Candida spp. bloodstream isolates were identified as C. albicans, indicating that the vast majority (~70%) of candidemia cases in Kuwait are now caused by non-albicans Candida. Interestingly, C. auris has emerged as the fourth most common cause of candidemia, surpassing C. glabrata, and was also the predominant species in two major hospitals in Kuwait in 2018. Resistance to fluconazole appears to be increasing, particularly among C. parapsilosis isolates in Kuwait; C. glabrata, with reduced susceptibility to echinocandins, was also isolated for the first time from a candidemia patient in Kuwait. Infections with other Candida/other yeast species were also detected and were associated with high (>45%) mortality rates. This study provides an understanding of the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in Kuwait and calls for the continuous monitoring of incidence and resistance trends as well as the emergence of clinically relevant yeast species, which may have a positive impact on patient care, infection control, and antifungal stewardship.
The DNA sequencing data reported in this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession no. LR137062 to LR137065, LS482924, MZ620708 to MZ620711, and MZ675666 to MZ675675.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed towards production of this manuscript: Data curation, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A., M.A., E.M., N.A.-S., K.A. (Khalifa Albenwan), W.A., I.A.-O., A.J., E.A.-R., Z.K., L.J. and S.V.; formal analysis, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A., M.A., E.M., N.A.-S., K.A. (Khalifa Albenwan), W.A., I.A.-O., A.J., E.A.-R., Z.K., L.J. and S.V.; investigation, K.A., S.A., M.A., N.A.-S., K.A. (Khalifa Albenwan), W.A., L.J. and S.V.; methodology, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A., M.A., L.J. and S.V.; project administration, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A., M.A., E.M. and N.A.-S.; supervision, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A. and M.A.; writing—original draft, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, K.A. (Khaled Alobaid), S.A., M.A., E.M., N.A.-S., K.A. (Khalifa Albenwan), W.A., I.A.-O., A.J., E.A.-R., Z.K., L.J. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Study was approved by the Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Kuwait (approval letter 2017/698).

Informed Consent Statement

The need for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Kuwait as the results are reported using deidentified samples, without revealing patient identity.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available in the published article; the datasets are available from the corresponding author and can be provided upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sandhya Vayalil for expert technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richardson, M.; Lass-Flörl, C. Changing epidemiology of systemic fungal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jenks, J.D.; Cornely, O.A.; Chen, S.C.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Hoenigl, M. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections: Who is at risk? Mycoses 2020, 63, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Friedman, D.Z.P.; Schwartz, I.S. Emerging fungal infections: New patients, new patterns, and new pathogens. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gudlaugsson, O.; Gillespie, S.; Lee, K.; Vande Berg, J.; Hu, J.; Messer, S.; Herwaldt, L.; Pfaller, M.; Diekema, D. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 1172–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Pfaller, M.A.; Andes, D.R.; Diekema, D.J.; Horn, D.L.; Reboli, A.C.; Rotstein, C.; Franks, B.; Azie, N.E. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2496 patients: Data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry 2004–2008. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lamoth, F.; Lockhart, S.R.; Berkow, E.L.; Calandra, T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, i4–i13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koehler, P.; Stecher, M.; Cornely, O.A.; Koehler, D.; Vehreschild, M.J.G.T.; Bohlius, J.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Vehreschild, J.J. Morbidity and mortality of candidaemia in Europe: An epidemiologic meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 1200–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hassan, I.; Powell, G.; Sidhu, M.; Hart, W.M.; Denning, D.W. Excess mortality, length of stay and cost attributable to candidaemia. J. Infect. 2009, 59, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McCarty, T.P.; Pappas, P.G. Invasive candidiasis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Diekema, D.; Arbefeville, S.; Boyken, L.; Kroeger, J.; Pfaller, M. The changing epidemiology of healthcare-associated candidemia over three decades. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 73, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pfaller, M.A.; Jones, R.N.; Castanheira, M. Regional data analysis of Candida non-albicans strains collected in United States medical sites over a 6-year period, 2006–2011. Mycoses 2014, 57, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; Castanheira, M.; Jones, R.N. Twenty Years of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program: Results for Candida Species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6 (Suppl. 1), S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Turner, S.A.; Butler, G. The Candida pathogenic species complex. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a019778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ciurea, C.N.; Kosovski, I.B.; Mare, A.D.; Toma, F.; Pintea-Simon, I.A.; Man, A. Candida and candidiasis-opportunism versus pathogenicity: A review of the virulence traits. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guinea, J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20 (Suppl. 6), 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Mokaddas, E.; Al-Banwan, K.; Alfouzan, W.; Al-Obaid, I.; Al-Obaid, K.; Asadzadeh, M.; Jeragh, A.; et al. Changing trends in epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of six bloodstream Candida species isolates over a 12-year period in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216250. [Google Scholar]
  19. Khan, Z.U.; Al-Sweih, N.A.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Kazemi, N.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L.; Chandy, R. Outbreak of fungemia among neonates caused by Candida haemulonii resistant to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2025–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Al-Sweih, N.; Alfouzan, W.; Joseph, L.; Asadzadeh, M. Candida kefyr in Kuwait: Prevalence, antifungal drug susceptibility and genotypic heterogeneity. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240426. [Google Scholar]
  21. Arastehfar, A.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Daneshnia, F.; Ilkit, M.; Boekhout, T.; Gabaldon, T.; Perlin, D.S. The quiet and underappreciated rise of drug-resistant invasive fungal pathogens. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahmad, S.; Alfouzan, W. Candida auris: Epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, antifungal susceptibility and infection control measures to combat the spread of infections in healthcare facilities. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Quindos, G. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yapar, N. Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive candidiasis. Ther. Clin. Risk. Manag. 2014, 10, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Barchiesi, F.; Orsetti, E.; Mazzanti, S.; Trave, F.; Salvi, A.; Nitti, C.; Manso, E. Candidemia in the elderly: What does it change? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pammi, M.; Holland, L.; Butler, G.; Gacser, A. Candida parapsilosis is a significant neonatal pathogen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014, 32, e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S. Candida auris: An emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen of global significance. Clin. Med. Res. Pract. 2017, 7, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Benwan, K.; Purohit, P.; Al-Obaid, I.; Bafna, R.; Emara, M.; Mokaddas, E.; Abdullah, A.A.; Al-Obaid, K.; et al. Invasive Candida auris infections in Kuwait hospitals: Epidemiology, antifungal treatment and outcome. Infection 2018, 46, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.O.; Denning, D.W. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, Z.U.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Joseph, L.; Alfouzan, F.; Asadzadeh, M. Increasing prevalence, molecular characterization and antifungal drug susceptibility of serial Candida auris isolates in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jamal, W.Y.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.U.; Rotimi, V.O. Comparative evaluation of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of clinically significant yeasts. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 26, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Al-Obaid, K.; Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Population structure and molecular genetic characterization of clinical Candida tropicalis isolates from a tertiary-care hospital in Kuwait reveal infections with unique strains. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, Z. Simple, low-cost detection of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates and molecular fingerprinting of Candida orthopsilosis strains in Kuwait by ITS region sequencing and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L. Candida lusitaniae in Kuwait: Prevalence, antifungal susceptibility and role in neonatal fungemia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Khan, Z.U.; Ahmad, S.; Hagen, F.; Fell, J.W.; Kowshik, T.; Chandy, R.; Boekhout, T. Cryptococcus randhawai sp. nov., a novel anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast isolated from tree trunk hollow of Ficus religiosa (peepal tree) from New Delhi, India. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2010, 97, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 1st ed.; CLSI Supplement M60; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lass-Flörl, C.; Arendrup, M.C.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Donnelly, P.; Hope, W.; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST technical note on Amphotericin B. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, E27–E29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing and Interpretation. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html (accessed on 30 June 2021).
  39. Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, Z. Epidemiology and molecular basis of resistance to fluconazole among clinical Candida parapsilosis isolates in Kuwait. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Al-Sweih, N.; Alfouzan, W.; Joseph, L. Candida auris in various hospitals across Kuwait and their susceptibility and molecular basis of resistance to antifungal drugs. Mycoses 2020, 63, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Baqsami, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Antifungal drug susceptibility, molecular basis of resistance to echinocandins and molecular epidemiology of fluconazole resistance among clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Kuwait. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Haqqan, A.; Al-Sweih, N.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L.; Varghese, S.; Khan, Z. Azole-resistant Candida blankii as a newly recognized cause of bloodstream infection. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 26, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alobaid, K.; Abdullah, A.A.; Ahmad, S.; Joseph, L.; Khan, Z. Magnusiomyces capitatus fungemia: The value of direct microscopy in early diagnosis. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2019, 25, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Obaid, K.; Ahmad, S.; Joseph, L.; Khan, Z. Lodderomyces elongisporus: A bloodstream pathogen of greater clinical significance. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 26, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Invasive candidiasis: A review of nonculture-based laboratory diagnostic methods. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 30, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arendrup, M.C.; Fuursted, K.; Gahrn-Hansen, B.; Schønheyder, H.C.; Knudsen, J.D.; Jensen, I.M.; Bruun, B.; Christensen, J.J.; Johansen, H.K. Semi-national surveillance of fungaemia in Denmark 2004–2006: Increasing incidence of fungaemia and numbers of isolates with reduced azole susceptibility. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Osman, M.; Al Bikai, A.; Rafei, R.; Mallat, H.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Update on invasive fungal infections in the Middle Eastern and North African region. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Borjian Boroujeni, Z.; Shamsaei, S.; Yarahmadi, M.; Getso, M.I.; Salimi Khorashad, A.; Haghighi, L.; Raissi, V.; Zareei, M.; Saleh Mohammadzade, A.; Moqarabzadeh, V.; et al. Distribution of invasive fungal infections: Molecular epidemiology, etiology, clinical conditions, diagnosis and risk factors: A 3-year experience with 490 patients under intensive care. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmad, S.; Mokaddas, E.; Al-Mutairi, N.M. Prevalence of tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Middle East Region. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Iqbal, J.; Ahmad, S.; Sher, A.; Al-Awadhi, M. Current epidemiological characteristics of imported malaria, vector control status and malaria elimination prospects in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F. Occurrence of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with TR34/L98H mutations in outdoor and hospital environment in Kuwait. Environ. Res. 2014, 133, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Asadzadeh, M.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, Z. Molecular fingerprinting studies do not support intrahospital transmission of Candida albicans among candidemia patients in Kuwait. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ben-Ami, R.; Rahav, G.; Elinav, H.; Kassis, I.; Shalit, I.; Gottesman, T.; Megged, O.; Weinberger, M.; Ciobotaro, P.; Shitrit, P.; et al. Distribution of fluconazole-resistant Candida bloodstream isolates among hospitals and inpatient services in Israel. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Tsay, S.V.; Mu, Y.; Williams, S.; Epson, E.; Nadle, J.; Bamberg, W.M.; Barter, D.M.; Johnston, H.L.; Farley, M.M.; Harb, S.; et al. Burden of Candidemia in the United States, 2017. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, e449–e453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Puig-Asensio, M.; Padilla, B.; Garnacho-Montero, J.; Zaragoza, O.; Aguado, J.M.; Zaragoza, R.; Montejo, M.; Muñoz, P.; Ruiz-Camps, I.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; et al. Epidemiology and predictive factors for early and late mortality in Candida bloodstream infections: A population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O245–O254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lausch, K.R.; Søgaard, M.; Rosenvinge, F.S.; Johansen, H.K.; Boysen, T.; Røder, B.; Mortensen, K.L.; Nielsen, L.; Lemming, L.; Olesen, B.; et al. High incidence of candidaemia in a nationwide cohort: Underlying diseases, risk factors and mortality. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 76, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hajjeh, R.A.; Sofair, A.N.; Harrison, L.H.; Lyon, G.M.; Arthington-Skaggs, B.A.; Mirza, S.A.; Phelan, M.; Morgan, J.; Lee-Yang, W.; Ciblak, M.A.; et al. Incidence of bloodstream infections due to Candida species and in vitro susceptibilities of isolates collected from 1998 to 2000 in a population-based active surveillance program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, W.; Song, X.; Wu, H.; Zheng, R. Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of Candida albicans vs. non-albicans candidaemia in adult patients in Northeast China. Epidemiol. Infect. 2019, 147, e277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Zeng, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tian, G.; Yang, K.; Deng, J.; Li, G.; Liu, J. A seven-year surveillance study of the epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, risk factors and mortality of candidaemia among paediatric and adult inpatients in a tertiary teaching hospital in China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ricotta, E.E.; Lai, Y.L.; Babiker, A.; Strich, J.R.; Kadri, S.S.; Lionakis, M.S.; Prevots, D.R.; Adjemian, J. Invasive candidiasis species distribution and trends, United States, 2009–2017. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 223, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chayakulkeeree, M.; Denning, D.W. Serious fungal infections in Thailand. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 931–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Odds, F.C.; Hanson, M.F.; Davidson, A.D.; Jacobsen, M.D.; Wright, P.; Whyte, J.A.; Gow, N.A.R.; Jones, B.L. One year prospective survey of Candida bloodstream infections in Scotland. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Q.; Pan, S. Candidemia: Incidence rates, types of species, and risk factors at a tertiary care academic hospital in China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 22, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Kim, E.J.; Lee, E.; Kwak, Y.G.; Yoo, H.M.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Shin, M.J.; Yoo, S.Y.; Cho, N.H.; Choi, Y.H.; et al. Trends in the epidemiology of candidemia in intensive care units from 2006 to 2017: Results from the Korean National Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance System. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 606976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tan, B.H.; Chakrabarti, A.; Li, R.Y.; Patel, A.K.; Watcharananan, S.P.; Liu, Z.; Chindamporn, A.; Tan, A.L.; Sun, P.L.; Wu, U.I.; et al. Incidence and species distribution of candidaemia in Asia: A laboratory-based surveillance study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Chakrabarti, A.; Sood, P.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Chen, S.; Jillwin, J.; Iyer, R.; Sharma, A.; Harish, B.N.; Roy, I.; Kindo, A.J.; et al. Characteristics, outcome and risk factors for mortality of paediatric patients with ICU-acquired candidemia in India: A multicentre prospective study. Mycoses 2020, 61, 1149–1163, Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ngamchokwathana, C.; Chongtrakool, P.; Waesamaae, A.; Chayakulkeeree, M. Risk factors and outcomes of non-albicans Candida bloodstream infection in patients with candidemia at Siriraj Hospital-Thailand’s largest national tertiary referral hospital. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mathur, P.; Hasan, F.; Singh, P.K.; Malhotra, R.; Walia, K.; Chowdhary, A. Five-year profile of candidaemia at an Indian trauma centre: High rates of Candida auris blood stream infections. Mycoses 2018, 61, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. van Schalkwyk, E.; Mpembe, R.S.; Thomas, J.; Shuping, L.; Ismail, H.; Lowman, W.; Karstaedt, A.S.; Chibabhai, V.; Wadula, J.; Avenant, T.; et al. Epidemiologic shift in candidemia driven by Candida auris, South Africa, 2016–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1698–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Adam, R.D.; Revathi, G.; Okinda, N.; Fontaine, M.; Shah, J.; Kagotho, E.; Castanheira, M.; Pfaller, M.A.; Maina, D. Analysis of Candida auris fungemia at a single facility in Kenya. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 85, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Shastri, P.S.; Shankarnarayan, S.A.; Oberoi, J.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Wattal, C.; Chakrabarti, A. Candida auris candidaemia in an intensive care unit-Prospective observational study to evaluate epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome. J. Crit. Care 2020, 57, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xiang, M.J.; Liu, J.Y.; Ni, P.H.; Wang, S.; Shi, C.; Wei, B.; Ni, Y.X.; Ge, H.L. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013, 13, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Alfouzan, W.; Ahmad, S.; Dhar, R.; Asadzadeh, M.; Almerdasi, N.; Abdo, N.M.; Joseph, L.; de Groot, T.; Alali, W.Q.; Khan, Z.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Candida auris outbreak in a major secondary-care hospital in Kuwait. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bougnoux, M.E.; Dannaoui, E.; Accoceberry, I.; Angoulvant, A.; Bailly, E.; Botterel, F.; Chevrier, S.; Chouaki, T.; Cornet, M.; Dalle, F.; et al. Multicenter comparison of the Etest and EUCAST methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates to micafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 5088–5091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Bienvenu, A.L.; Leboucher, G.; Picot, S. Comparison of fks gene mutations and minimum inhibitory concentrations for the detection of Candida glabrata resistance to micafungin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mycoses 2019, 62, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Song, Y.; Chen, X.; Yan, Y.; Wan, Z.; Liu, W.; Li, R. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of pathogenic yeasts in China: A 10-year retrospective study in a teaching hospital. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Lortholary, O.; Bretagne, S.; Dromer, F. Azole susceptibility profiles of more than 9,000 clinical yeast isolates belonging to 40 common and rare species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e02615–e02620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lin, S.Y.; Lu, P.L.; Tan, B.H.; Chakrabarti, A.; Wu, U.I.; Yang, J.H.; Patel, A.K.; Li, R.Y.; Watcharananan, S.P.; Liu, Z.; et al. The epidemiology of non-Candida yeast isolated from blood: The Asia Surveillance Study. Mycoses 2019, 62, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Stavrou, A.A.; Lackner, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Boekhout, T. The changing spectrum of Saccharomycotina yeasts causing candidemia: Phylogeny mirrors antifungal susceptibility patterns for azole drugs and amphothericin B. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foz037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Stavrou, A.A.; Pérez-Hansen, A.; Lackner, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Boekhout, T. Elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations to antifungal drugs prevail in 14 rare species of candidemia-causing Saccharomycotina yeasts. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jung, I.Y.; Jeong, S.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, H.Y.; Song, Y.G.; Kim, J.M.; Choi, J.Y. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species and the predictive factors of mortality in South Korean patients with candidemia. Medicine 2020, 99, e19494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bretagne, S.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Sitbon, K.; Lortholary, O.; Che, D.; Dromer, F.; Participants of the YEASTS. No Impact of fluconazole to echinocandins replacement as first-line therapy on the epidemiology of yeast fungemia (hospital-driven active surveillance, 2004–2017, Paris, France). Front. Med. 2021, 8, 641965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lin, H.C.; Lin, H.Y.; Su, B.H.; Ho, M.W.; Ho, C.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Lin, M.H.; Hsieh, H.Y.; Lin, H.C.; Li, T.C.; et al. Reporting an outbreak of Candida pelliculosa fungemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2013, 46, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Yang, Y.; Wu, W.; Ding, L.; Yang, L.; Su, J.; Wu, B. Two different clones of Candida pelliculosa bloodstream infection in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2021, 15, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chowdhary, A.; Stielow, J.B.; Upadhyaya, G.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, A.; Meis, J.F. Candida blankii: An emerging yeast in an outbreak of fungaemia in neonates in Delhi, India. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 648.e5–648.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Al-Sweih, N.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, S.; Joseph, L.; Asadzadeh, M.; Khan, Z. Cyberlindnera fabianii fungemia outbreak in preterm neonates in Kuwait and literature review. Mycoses 2019, 62, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Alp, S.; Gulmez, D.; Ayaz, C.M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Akova, M. Fungaemia due to rare yeasts in a tertiary care university centre within 18 years. Mycoses 2020, 63, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kaur, H.; Singh, S.; Mandya Rudramurthy, S.; Jayashree, M.; James Peters, N.; Ray, P.; Samujh, R.; Ghosh, A.; Chakrabarti, A. Fungaemia due to rare yeasts in paediatric intensive care units: A prospective study. Mycoses 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Number of beds, catchment area, and units/specialties available in different hospitals in Kuwait.
Table 1. Number of beds, catchment area, and units/specialties available in different hospitals in Kuwait.
Hospital NameType of FacilityCatchment Area in KuwaitNo. of BedsMajor Units and/or Specialties Available
AdanSecondary careAhmadi826MED, SUR, PAE, GAS, PUL, RHE, NEO, CAR, NEU, OBS, and GYN
KOCSecondary careAhmadi300MED, SUR, PAE, GAS, PUL, RHE, and NEU
MAKSecondary careHawally726MED, SUR, PAE, GAS, PUL, RHE, CAR, and NEU
AmiriSecondary careCapital428MED, SUR, GAS, PUL, RHE, CAR, and NEU
Al-Sabah aSecondary careCentral372MED, SUR, PUL, RHE, ENT, and OPT
NBK aTertiary careEntire Kuwait67P-HAE & P-ONC
FarwaniyaSecondary careFarwaniya868MED, SUR, PAE, GAS, PUL, RHE, NEO, NEU, OBS, and GYN
JahraSecondary careJahra765MED, SUR, PAE, GAS, PUL, RHE, NEO, OBS, and GYN
MaternitySpecializedCapital, Hawally453NEO, OBS, and GYN
Ibn Sina bTertiary careEntire Kuwait355Burn, NEU, NES, P-HAE, P-SUR, and KT
KCCC bTertiary careEntire Kuwait199A-HAE, A-ONC, and BMT
ChestTertiary careEntire Kuwait323CAR, Cardiac, Pulmonary and Thoracic specialties
Al-RaziTertiary careEntire Kuwait465Orthopedic
KOC, Kuwait Oil Company; MAK, Mubarak Al-Kabeer; NBK, National Bank of Kuwait; KCCC, Kuwait Cancer Control Center; MED, medical; SUR, surgical; PAE, pediatric; GAS, gastroenterology; PUL, pulmonology; RHE, rheumatology; NEO, neonatology; CAR, careology; NEU, neurology; OBS, obstetrics; GYN, gynecology; ENT, ear, nose, and throat; OPT, ophthalmology; P-HAE, pediatric hematology; P-ONC, pediatric oncology; NES, neurosurgery; P-SUR, pediatric surgery; KT, kidney transplantation; A-HAE, adult hematology; A-ONC, adult oncology; BMT, bone marrow transplantation. a Al-Sabah Hospital shares laboratory services with NBK Hospital. b Ibn Sina Hospital shares laboratory services with KCCC.
Table 2. The DNA sequences of forward and reverse primers and their location in ERG11.
Table 2. The DNA sequences of forward and reverse primers and their location in ERG11.
Primer NameFragment LocationNucleotide Position *DirectionDNA Sequence
CalERG11F1N-terminal fragment−415 to −394Forward5′-CACGACAACTTTCAAAGATTGA-3′
CalERG11R1N-terminal fragment149 to 127Reverse5′-AATGGAGCTCTATCTTTTCTTAA-3′
CalERG11F2Internal fragment 1−93 to −71Forward5′-AAAGAAAGGGAATTCAATCGTTA-3′
CalERG11R2Internal fragment 1576 to 554Reverse5′-TTGAGTTTTCATAACATTGGCAA-3′
CalERG11F3Internal fragment 2440 to 462Forward5′-AATTTGCTTTGACTACTGATTCA-3′
CalERG11R3Internal fragment 21043 to 1021Reverse5′-AAATCACCACCTTTTTCTTTCAA-3′
CalERG11F4Internal fragment 3909 to 931Forward5′-TATTCTTATGGGTGGTCAACATA-3′
CalERG11R4Internal fragment 31445 to 1424Reverse5′-GTTCCCAATTGAACATAAGCAA-3′
CalERG11F5C-terminal fragment1315 to 1337Forward5′-TTTAACTCTTCTGATGAAGTTGA-3′
CalERG11R5C-terminal fragment1762 to 1739Reverse5′-ATTGAGTCATCCTAACAATTACAA-3′
* Nucleotide position is shown relative to the start codon (+1 nucleotide).
Table 3. Distribution of candidemia patients in eight major hospitals and other tertiary care hospitals in Kuwait in 2018.
Table 3. Distribution of candidemia patients in eight major hospitals and other tertiary care hospitals in Kuwait in 2018.
HospitalTotal No. ofGenderNo. Candidemia of Patients of Different Age (years)Hospital Unit
PatientsMaleFemale<1≥1–19≥20–49≥50–64≥65ICUWard
Adan3824 a13 a103102132216
Mubaral Al-Kabeer361719053424531
Amiri1459002210311
Al-Sabah211650343109 a11 a
Ibn Sina18990 a2 a7 a4 a4 a108
Maternity331617330000330
Jahra15872711487
Farwaniya3318153186151716
Others *15960134787
a Details of one patient were not available. * Other hospitals included Ahmadi Kuwait Oil Company Hospital, Chest Diseases Hospital, Al-Razi Orthopedic Hospital, and Kuwait Cancer Control Center.
Table 4. Spectrum of Candida species isolated from candidemia patients in Kuwait in 2018.
Table 4. Spectrum of Candida species isolated from candidemia patients in Kuwait in 2018.
Age (in years) of Candidemia PatientsCandida Species Isolates Identified as
C. albicans, n = 74C. parapsilosis,n = 54C. tropicalis, n = 35C. auris, n = 33C. glabrata, n = 32Others a, n = 11
<127132067
≥1–19692100
≥20–4911710780
≥50–641124541
≥6519231620143
Unknown001000
aC. krusei, n = 4; C. lusitaniae, n = 3; C. blankii, n = 1; C. dubliniensis, n = 1; C. guilliermondii, n = 1; C. pelliculosa, n = 1.
Table 5. Distribution of Candida species among candidemia patients admitted into wards and ICUs of eight major and other hospitals in Kuwait.
Table 5. Distribution of Candida species among candidemia patients admitted into wards and ICUs of eight major and other hospitals in Kuwait.
Hospital NameUnitNo. of Candidemic Episodes Caused byTotal
C. albicansC. parapsilosisC. tropicalisC. aurisC. glabrataOther Candida Species a
AdanICU122116022
Ward35313116
Mubarak Al-KabeerICU2100126
Ward1113704136
AmiriICU0020002
Ward31523014
Al-SabahICU11181012
Ward13260012
Ibn-SinaICU22330010
Ward0341008
MaternityICU188004434
Ward0000000
JahraICU2320119
Ward4110006
FarwaniyaICU52271118
Ward43245018
Others *ICU65002114
Ward0100102
Total745435333211239
aC. krusei, n = 4; C. lusitaniae, n = 3; C. blankii, n = 1; C. dubliniensis, n = 1; C. guilliermondii, n = 1; C. pelliculosa, n = 1. * Other hospitals included: Ahmadi Kuwait Oil Company Hospital, Chest Diseases Hospital, Al-Razi Orthopedic Hospital, and Kuwait Cancer Control Center.
Table 6. Antifungal Susceptibility Data of Candida Species Isolates against Four Antifungal Drugs by Etest.
Table 6. Antifungal Susceptibility Data of Candida Species Isolates against Four Antifungal Drugs by Etest.
Candida SpeciesAntifungal DrugMIC Range (μg/mL)GM ± SDResistant, n (%)
C. albicans (n = 74)Amphotericin B0.012–0.190.05 ± 0.040
Fluconazole0.047–80.58 ± 1.141 (1.4)
Caspofungin0.003–0.190.06 ± 0.0560
Voriconazole0.002–10.03 ± 0.131 (1.4)
C. parapsilosis (n = 54)Amphotericin B0.002–0.50.05 ± 0.130
Fluconazole0.19–2561.43 ± 39.919 (16.7)
Caspofungin0.064–1.50.32 ± 0.20
Voriconazole0.002–10.04 ± 0.211 (1.9)
C. tropicalis (n = 35)Amphotericin B0.002–0.50.115 ± 0.1230
Fluconazole0.19–1.50.7 ± 0.360
Caspofungin0.004–0.250.08 ± 0.060
Voriconazole0.012–0.190.07 ± 0.050
C. auris (n = 33)Amphotericin B0.047–20.855 ± 0.4199 (27.3)
Fluconazole32–256212.66 ± 62.1333 (100)
Caspofungin0.016–0.50.24 ± 0.140
Voriconazole0.047–30.59 ± 0.896 (18.1)
C. glabrata (n = 32)Amphotericin B0.047–0.750.19 ± 0.20
Fluconazole3–25613.91 ± 71.384 (12.5)
Caspofungin0.012–0.380.11 ± 0.071 * (3)
Voriconazole0.064–160.28 ± 2.924 (12.5)
* Intermediate; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; GM, geometric mean; SD, standard deviation.
Table 7. Demographic and clinical details of patients infected with other Candida/yeast species, susceptibility data, treatment given, and outcome.
Table 7. Demographic and clinical details of patients infected with other Candida/yeast species, susceptibility data, treatment given, and outcome.
Patient
No.
Patients DetailsDate of Onset
of Fungemia
Isolate
No.
Candida or
Yeast spp.
Etest MIC (µg/mL) forAntifungal
Treatment
OutcomeReference
HospitalUnitGenderAgeAMBFLUVORCFG
1MAKWardFemale77 Years18.01.2018Kw217/1/18C. krusei0.2580.1250.25CFG, 14 daysDischarged, 22.07.2018This study
2MAKICUFemale58 Years16.04.2018Kw183/4/18C. krusei **0.75480.250.25CFG, 6 daysExpired, 24.04.2018This study
3MaternityICUFemale5 Days07.10.2018Kw136/10/18C. krusei0.004640.250.094L-AMB, 14 daysNot availableThis study
4KOCICUMale73 Years19.08.2018Kw210/8/18C. krusei0.25320.190.19Not availableNot availableThis study
5MaternityICUMale15 Days05.12.2018Kw94/12/18C. lusitaniae0.0160.250.0120.032L-AMB, 14 daysDischarged, 19.12.2018This study
6FarwaniyaICUFemale28 Days30.12.2018Kw39/1/2019C. lusitaniae0.0160.380.0160.008L-AMB, 14 days; CFG, 15 daysDischarged, 18.02.2019This study
7JahraICUMale9 Daysn. A.Kw51/6/18C. lusitaniae0.0470.250.0060.125L-AMB, 21 daysDischarged, 29.07.2018This study
8MaternityICUMale4 Months14.03.2018Kw142/3/18C. blankii0.125120.380.25L-AMB, 14 daysDischarged, 06.12.2018[42]
9AdanWardMale5 Months17.05.2018Kw205/5/18C. guilliermondii0.03240.0940.38Not availableNot availableThis study
10MaternityICUMale3 Days21.05.2018Kw251/5/2018C. pelliculosa0.02360.190.032L-AMB, 14 daysDischarged, 06.12.2018This study
11MAKICUFemale76 Years14.08.2018Kw152/8/18C. dubliniensis0.0160.380.0640.01CFG, 3 daysExpired, 26.08.2018This study
12MaternityICUMale1 Month14.03.2018Kw80/4/18C. fabianii0.2520.1250.38L-AMB + CFG, 14 days; FLU + CFG, 14 daysDischarged, 28.05.2018This study
13AmiriICUMale54 Years26.06.2018Kw146/7/18C. fabianii0.520.0640.094None *Expired, 27.06.2018This study
14MaternityICUMale8 Days28.07.2018Kw303/7/18C. fabianii0.06460.190.047L-AMB, 14 daysNot availableThis study
15MaternityICUMale3 Months09.09.2018Kw106/9/18C. fabianii0.51.50.0940.094L-AMB, 6 weeksDischarged, 27.03.2019This study
16MAKICUFemale67 Years20.09.2018Kw159/9/18M. capitatus1.5120.532None *Expired, 21.09.2018[43]
17AmiriICUFemale85 Years03.06.2018Kw86/6/18M. capitatus0.530.1932None *Expired, 06.06.2018[43]
18MAKWardFemale71 Years21.02.2018Kw261/2/18L. elongisporus0.0120.1250.0040.064CFG, One dose onlyExpired, 22.02.2018[44]
19AmiriWardFemale79 Years25.10.2018Kw25/11/18K. ohmeri0.0082560.190.19None *Expired, 27.10.2018This study
20AdanWardFemale28 Days29.10.2018Kw162/11/18R. minuta6256232Not availableNot availableThis study
AMB, amphotericin B; FLU, fluconazole; VOR, voriconazole; CFG, caspofungin; L-AMB, ambisome; n.A., not available. * No treatment was given as the patients expired before culture produced a positive result. ** Mixed infection with C. glabrata.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alobaid, K.; Ahmad, S.; Asadzadeh, M.; Mokaddas, E.; Al-Sweih, N.; Albenwan, K.; Alfouzan, W.; Al-Obaid, I.; Jeragh, A.; Al-Roomi, E.; et al. Epidemiology of Candidemia in Kuwait: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080673

AMA Style

Alobaid K, Ahmad S, Asadzadeh M, Mokaddas E, Al-Sweih N, Albenwan K, Alfouzan W, Al-Obaid I, Jeragh A, Al-Roomi E, et al. Epidemiology of Candidemia in Kuwait: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(8):673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alobaid, Khaled, Suhail Ahmad, Mohammad Asadzadeh, Eiman Mokaddas, Noura Al-Sweih, Khalifa Albenwan, Wadha Alfouzan, Inaam Al-Obaid, Ahlam Jeragh, Ebtihal Al-Roomi, and et al. 2021. "Epidemiology of Candidemia in Kuwait: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 8: 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop