Next Article in Journal
Water Vapor Adsorption on Desiccant Materials for Rotary Desiccant Air Conditioning Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Research and Test on the Device of Downhole Near-Bit Temperature and Pressure Measurement While Drilling
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Weld Shape on Temperature Field of Nozzle Flowmeter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fracture Patterns of Rocks Observed under Cryogenic Conditions Using Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on the Mechanism of High-Efficiency Rock Breaking by Hydraulic Jet Based on Explicit Dynamics

Processes 2023, 11(7), 2165; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072165
by Gang Bi 1,2,*, Xin Wang 3, Fei Han 1, Jiemin Wu 1, Peijie Yuan 1, Shuaishuai Fu 1 and Ying Ma 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2023, 11(7), 2165; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072165
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 20 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper studied the mechanism of high-efficiency rock breaking by hydraulic jet based on explicit dynamics. In order to improve the manuscript, following problems should be revised and considered properly.

 1. Since the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) -FEM coupling algorithm is a gridless Lagrange algorithm, why the grids are divided in section 3.3.

2. In Eq.(1), there are no parameter and unit description. In Eq.(2), there are no units.

3. The dynamic analysis software LS-Dyna was used to simulate the rock-breaking process. How do you consider or realize different influence factors in the software?

4. The algorithm and calculation process of the mathematical model is from other software. What is the the novelty of the paper?

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

it is an interesting piece of research and can be published but requires major revisions. Most of the figures need to be improved. specific:

figures 1 and 2 do not have a scale, it is not known what size it is

figure 3 is too simple, it could be anything, include scale, some parameter of the model

Does the model in figure 4 have some boundary conditions? what is the scale

Figure 5 is too simplistic, please improve

Figure 6 ,7, 9, 10 and 15 need more explanation inside the figure, where is the surface? which is the scale? indicate some depht boundaries.

Figure 17 is too simplistic

Figures 18, 19 and 20 need scale

Can the test be applied to any type of rock? In what type of rock has the test been simulated, please clarify

page 38: what do authors mean with "traditional mining methods"? any specific method or all of them. Please clarify.

line 183: Booundary conditions must also be indicated in the model, e.g figure 4 and 5. Please indicate if this applies or not and why

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop