Solutions of Feature and Hyperparameter Model Selection in the Intelligent Manufacturing

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Line 32:  Since this sentence refers to efforts carried out in recent years and not a specific case, "was" should be changed to "has been". 

Line 36: One or two sentences introducing deep learning are needed. 

Line 39-40: The focus of this study should not be mentioned here, since it is mentioned again at the end of the introduction section. 

Line 32-52: These paragraphs should be placed under Line 84, given the fact that Lines 53-84 introduce the use of sensors to the readers.

Line 52: "Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)" should be removed. 

Line 95: "However" should be changed to "moreover".

Line 258: There is no need for three subheadings.

Line 298-302: Unfortunately, the figures are very difficult to read. Size and resolution should be amended accordingly.

Line 258 & Line 304: "methdology" should be changed to "Methodology" and "results" to "Results".

 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

Point 1: Line 32:  Since this sentence refers to efforts carried out in recent years and not a specific case, "was" should be changed to "has been". 

Response 1: adjusted

 

Point 2: Line 36: One or two sentences introducing deep learning are needed. 

Response 2: adjusted

 

Point 3: Line 39-40: The focus of this study should not be mentioned here, since it is mentioned again at the end of the introduction section. 

Response 3: adjusted

 

Point 4: Line 32-52: These paragraphs should be placed under Line 84, given the fact that Lines 53-84 introduce the use of sensors to the readers.

Response 4: adjusted

 

Point 5: Line 52: "Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)" should be removed. 

Response 5: adjusted

 

Point 6: Line 95: "However" should be changed to "moreover".

Response 6: adjusted

 

Point 7: Line 258: There is no need for three subheadings.

Response 7: adjusted

 

Point 8: Line 298-302: Unfortunately, the figures are very difficult to read. Size and resolution should be amended accordingly.

Response 8: adjusted

 

Point 9: Line 258 & Line 304: "methdology" should be changed to "Methodology" and "results" to "Results".

Response 9: adjusted

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The pictures in this paper can be beautified and improved. The pictures on the left and right sides of Fig.1 are not neatly arranged, so they can be typeset again. The content of some pictures cannot be clearly seen, as shown in FIG. 4-fig. 8, which should be changed into more intuitive and clear pictures.

2. The contribution of six sensors is mentioned in line 84-89 of this paper, but only five sensors are analyzed in the subsequent content. "Acoustic emission sensor" is not mentioned later, so relevant explanations should be added.

3. There is no text description of Table5 and Table6 in this paper, so relevant content should be added, such as the reason for selecting tool 2 data in Table6 as the tuning model.

4. There are three regression model indicators of MSE, MAPE and MAE in FIG. 8, but the paper only describes MSE and does not describe the data of MAPE and MAE in words, so corresponding contents should be added.

5. In line 173, the word "lager" should be followed by a "-". In line 237 of the paper, "such as" should be given as an example, without subparagraph.  In line 239 of the paper, whether the milling data of condition 2 is the condition 2 data of Table1, if so, it should be added.  In line 243, "nni" should be represented by capital letter "NNI".

6. The abbreviations "CCD", "LSTM" and "LightBGM" used in this paper should be described in full terms.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

Point 1: The pictures in this paper can be beautified and improved. The pictures on the left and right sides of Fig.1 are not neatly arranged, so they can be typeset again. The content of some pictures cannot be clearly seen, as shown in FIG. 4-fig. 8, which should be changed into more intuitive and clear pictures.

Response 1: adjusted

 

Point 2: The contribution of six sensors is mentioned in line 84-89 of this paper, but only five sensors are analyzed in the subsequent content. "Acoustic emission sensor" is not mentioned later, so relevant explanations should be added.

Response 2: The AE sensor signal was not studied in the paper, so it has been removed now.

 

Point 3: There is no text description of Table5 and Table6 in this paper, so relevant content should be added, such as the reason for selecting tool 2 data in Table6 as the tuning model.

Response 3: adjusted

 

Point 4: There are three regression model indicators of MSE, MAPE and MAE in FIG. 8, but the paper only describes MSE and does not describe the data of MAPE and MAE in words, so corresponding contents should be added.

Response 4: adjusted

 

Point 5: In line 173, the word "lager" should be followed by a "-". In line 237 of the paper, "such as" should be given as an example, without subparagraph.  In line 239 of the paper, whether the milling data of condition 2 is the condition 2 data of Table1, if so, it should be added.  In line 243, "nni" should be represented by capital letter "NNI".

Response 5: adjusted

 

Point 6: The abbreviations "CCD", "LSTM" and "LightBGM" used in this paper should be described in full terms.

Response 6: adjusted

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors revised the manuscript based on my comments and I think the paper can be accepted for publication.

Author Response

Point 1: The authors revised the manuscript based on my comments and I think the paper can be accepted for publication. 

Response 1: Thanks for agreeing with the points in my article.