Next Article in Journal
Psychometric Properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale for South America (CD-RISC-25SA) in Peruvian Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Timing of Systemic Steroids and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants < 29 Weeks Gestation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in Fetuses, Neonates and Children

by
Santiago Mencía
1,2,3,*,
Clara Alonso
3,4,
Carmen Pallás-Alonso
2,3,4,
Jesús López-Herce
1,2,3 and
Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II)
1
Pediatric Intensive Care Service, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Health Research Institute of Gregorio Marañón Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Departamento de Salud Pública y Maternoinfantil, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Carlos III Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Neonatology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Members of Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II) in the Acknowledgments.
Children 2022, 9(11), 1688; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111688
Submission received: 8 October 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine)

Abstract

:
The perception of pain is individual and differs between children and adults. The structures required to feel pain are developed at 24 weeks of gestation. However, pain assessment is complicated, especially in neonates, infants and preschool-age children. Clinical scales adapted to age are the most used methods for assessing and monitoring the degree of pain in children. They evaluate several behavioral and/or physiological parameters related to pain. Some monitors detect the physiological changes that occur in association with painful stimuli, but they do not yet have a clear clinical use. Multimodal analgesia is recommended for pain treatment with non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. It is necessary to establish pharmacotherapeutic protocols for analgesia adjusted to the acute or chronic, type and intensity of pain, as well as age. The most used analgesics in children are paracetamol, ibuprofen, dipyrone, opioids (morphine and fentanyl) and local anesthetics. Patient-controlled analgesia is an adequate alternative for adolescent and older children in specific situations, such as after surgery. In patients with severe or persistent pain, it is very important to consult with specific pain services.

1. Introduction

Pain can be defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage” [1]. Pain consists of two features: nociception and emotional reaction.
Perception of pain is individual and differs between children and adults. The sensation of pain is not only influenced by neurophysiological mechanisms but also by both psychological aspects and the environment [2]. These aspects affect and modulate the nociceptive sensation so that the same pathological situation may cause very different painful perceptions depending on the individual. In general, children pay maximum attention to pain, which could lead increased anxiety and fear of the painful sensation, magnifying the sensory experience [3,4].
Therefore, different pain management strategies are required in children than in adults, highlighting the importance of prior preparation and non-pharmacological interventions before performing any painful procedure in a child [5,6] (Table 1).

2. Fetal Pain

2.1. Fetal Pain

Pain is a conscious and subjective experience and not just a response to noxious stimuli. For human beings to be able to experience pain, a series of physiologically mature neurological structures is needed. On the other hand, for the experience of pain to occur, other cognitive processes related to the state of consciousness and memory must be developed, which, in turn, allow an event to be discriminated as painful [7,8,9,10,11].
The development of neural pathways involved in pain pathophysiology begins early in fetal life, around the seventh week of gestation, followed by the development of the thalamus and neural connections in the cerebral cortex [7,8,9]. Therefore, some authors suggest that fetal pain does not occur before 24 weeks of gestation because the structures of the central nervous system (CNS) required for pain perception. such as the cortex, spinal cord and thalamus are not fully developed [10]. However, other authors argue that pain perception can occur, mediated by developmental structures, such as the subplate, between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation [11,12,13,14]. Additionally, behavioral changes associated with pain, such as simple motor responses, including crying and facial expressions, are described in fetuses and very premature neonates [15,16].

2.2. Fetal Pain Evaluation

Several physiological reactions in fetuses, such as crying, avoidance or changes in the levels of stress hormones, can be interpreted as signals of pain.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fetal magnetoencephalographic imaging showed evoked responses to vibroacoustic and visual stimuli in the third trimester [17,18,19].
Ultrasound investigation has enabled the acquisition of behavioral characteristics in fetuses, such as crying [20,21], as well as fetal facial expressions of acute pain in surgery [22], as well as fetal movement in response to contact with an amniocentesis needle [23].
Fetuses exposed to a prolonged painful invasive procedures have increased concentrations of cortisol and beta endorphins in plasma [24,25].

2.3. Treatment of Fetal Pain in Fetal Surgery

Treatment of fetal pain is especially significant in fetal surgery. There are three main administration routes of fetal anesthesia and analgesia: uteroplacental transfer; intravenous, usually by the umbilical line; or intramuscularly [26]. Volatile anesthetics and opioids limit the fetal stress response, although they can produce cardiovascular fetal depression, although likely without side effects for short procedures [27].
Most authors use deep general maternal anesthesia in ex-utero intrapartum therapy surgery to anesthetic the mother and the fetus and in fetoscopies the preferences are administrate the anesthesia and analgesia directly to the fetus, usually applying an intramuscular route or umbilical line [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

3. Neonatal Pain

After painful stimulus, newborns have demonstrated in MRI scans that brain regions encoding sensory and affective components of pain responses are similar to those in adults [37].
Excessive or maintained pain exposure can be detrimental, causing adverse physiological effects and even long-term consequences [38,39,40]. Preterm infants, after experiencing pain, were reported to suffer hyperalgesia and allodynia, producing prolonged stress [41].
Infants born very preterm (<32 weeks), have received many pain-related insults in a vulnerable cerebral period, require special attention [38]. Repeated pain-related stress in very premature newborns is associated with alteration of brain development during the neonatal period, [42] as well as later functional cortical activity impairment with thinning of the brain cortex, white matter microstructure alterations and cognitive outcome at school age [43,44].

4. Pain in Children

Children usually feel pain differently than adults. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American Pain Society provided a general definition of pediatric pain: “the concept of pain and suffering goes far beyond a simple sensory experience. There are emotional, cognitive and behavioral components, along with developmental, environmental and sociocultural aspects” [45]. This definition underlines the importance of the subjectivity of pain [46]. Fear and anxiety produce suffering and increase the perception of pain in children, especially the fear of separation from their parents. An important goal of pain management is to eliminate the suffering associated with pain.

5. Pain Assessment

5.1. Concepts

The first step in the treatment of pain is its detection; several circumstances must first be taken into account:
-
The characteristics of the child: age, sex, sociocultural level and mood.
-
The characteristics of the pain: form of onset, intensity, evolution, duration, etiology and consequences that may be triggered [47].
The assessment of pain in children is complex, specifically in neonates, infants and preschool-aged children, because the expression of pain is undifferentiated, so it is often not possible to distinguish between pain, irritability and anxiety. Because they are not verbal, pain assessment tools rely on surrogated measures of physiologic, behavioral and biobehavioral responses to pain.
The most frequent physiologic indicators of pain are changes in heart and respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. The use of vital signs alone is not adequate because neonates and infants cannot maintain an autonomic response to pain and other factors, such a mechanical ventilation and drugs [48]. These indicators are also affected by other physiological stimuli, such a hypovolemia or fever.
The most used indicators are crying, facial activity, body movements, resting positions, agitation, consolability and sleeplessness. The assessment of these behavioral indicators depends on gestational age, mechanical ventilation and pharmacological treatment, and neurologic impairment and neuromuscular blockade may also decrease or alter responses to pain in critically ill children.

5.2. Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools

Several neonatal pain assessment tools are available [49,50,51]. Only three pain scales, PIPP-R, N-PASS and BPSN, are adapted to premature infants. The most commonly used pain scales are summarized in Table 2 [48,52]. Pain assessment tools should be selected with consideration of the population (full-term vs. preterm), context and type of pain (procedural vs. postoperative) [51,52].
Most tools adequately assess acute pain but not persistent or prolonged pain. Only two scales are adequate for prolonged pain (N-PASS and EDIN) [53]. The COMFORTneo scale was reported to be useful for evaluation of prolonged pain in [48].
Most parameters evaluated by these tools are subjective and require observation and recording in real time.
Other tools, such as neuroimaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging and near-infrared spectroscopy) and neurophysiologic techniques (amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, changes in skin conductance and heart rate variability) during acute or prolonged pain, were studied in [44,51]. Hormonal markers of stress, such as cortisol and parameters of oxidative stress, increase with pain stimuli, but they are not used in clinical settings at this time.

5.3. Pain Assessment Tools for Children

5.3.1. Clinical Scales

Clinical scales are the most commonly used instruments for pain assessment and monitoring [54]. The most frequently used are numerical, visual analogue or graphic scales adapted to the patient’s age. Through these scales, the patient can indicate the intensity of pain or the observer estimates the pain intensity based on the child’s behavior.
In the preverbal stage (1 month to 3 years), the scales mainly use facial expression and motor and physiological responses, such as crying. In the verbal stage (3 to 8 years) self-report can be tested using photographs and drawings of faces. From the age of 8 years onwards, verbal scale, numerical scale and graphic scales, as well as the visual analogue scale, can be used [55,56,57].
The most commonly used scales for the assessment of pain in child who are able to communicate are:
  • The visual analogue scale (VAS), which is represented on a 10 cm line between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable). VAS < 4 indicates mild or mild–moderate pain, 4–6 indicates moderate–severe pain and >6 indicates severe pain.
  • The verbal numeric scale (VNS): the child expresses their perception of pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
  • Graphic scales, which may consist of drawings of happy faces that change to sad according to the degree of pain, columns or thermometers that are more or less filled in, color ranges, etc.
In most children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), it is not possible to use such scales, as many of the patients are sedated and unable to communicate. The same applies to children under 3 years of age in the preverbal stage. In such cases, the identification of pain requires tools based on changes in physiological parameters, facial expression or motor response to estimate the degree of pain [54,58].
Two scales have been validated for use in critically ill children:
  • The FLACC scale (face, leg, activity, cry, consolability) (Table 3), which considers facial expression, leg attitude, spontaneous activity, the presence and characteristics of crying and the ability to comfort or consolability, with scores ranging between 0 and 2 points for each item. A value of 0 indicates no pain, and scores of 9–10 indicate unbearable pain.
2.
MAPS scale (multidimensional assessment pain scale) (Table 4). This scale is based on the observation of body movements and facial expression. It is a multidimensional scale that also includes physiological parameters, such as breathing, changes in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Similar to the FLACC scale, it classifies pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 9–10 (unbearable pain) [59].

5.3.2. Objective Pain Monitoring

Some monitors detect physiological changes that occur in association with painful stimuli and stress based on electromyograms, plethysmography, electrocardiograms, skin conductance or measurement of the diameter of the pupil. Such monitors can quantify the intensity of pain and the response to treatment. These parameters are objective, non-invasive, relatively easy to use and can be used at the patient’s bedside. However, they are unspecific (other non-pain stimulus, such as agitation, fear and stress, produce the same response) and are expensive. Therefore, they have not yet been applied in clinical settings [60,61]. Such monitors include:
Conductance skin impedance monitor (Medstorm Innovations, Oslo, Norway), which assesses the stress response through changes in skin conductance produced by sympathetic stimulation. It is non-invasive with rapid response but does not differentiate between agitation and pain and it is not able to measure baseline stress [62].
The analgesia nociception index (ANI), which is based on the RR variability of ECG intervals. This is a continuous line measurement of parasympathetic tone, which is part of the autonomic nervous system that assesses nociception [63,64].
The pain pupillary index (PPI) measurement, which provides real-time information from a video camera and infrared pupillary diameter [65].

6. Treatment

In the 2010 Montreal Declaration, access to pain treatment was declared a fundamental human right, constituting a violation of human rights not to treat pain [66,67,68,69,70,71].
It is important to develop treatment protocols to prevent procedural pain by combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. The intensity of analgesia should be adjusted to the intensity of the potential pain and ensure adequate supervision and monitoring [72,73].

6.1. Non-Pharmacological Analgesia

The aim of non-pharmacological analgesia is to increase patient comfort and reduce stress related to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures [74,75]. It should not be used as a substitute for pharmacological treatment but should be combined with pharmacological treatment [76,77,78].
Mechanisms of action are not yet well explained, but such interventions likely reduce the sensitivity of the nociceptive system. Some such measures release endogenous endorphins, activating opioid-enhancing neuropeptides inducing distraction from pain.
Such measures can be classified based on the mechanism of action [79].
Environmental strategies: low noise and lighting, soothing smells or clustering procedures to avoid over handling by modifying the environment to reduce sensibility to pain.
Cognitive strategies, including distraction methods, particularly used in older children.
Behavioral strategies, including direct (rocking) or indirect (non-nutritive sucking) manipulation of the infant’s body. These techniques produce relaxing tactile stimuli before, during and/or after the painful procedure to reduce pain [80,81].
The main non-pharmacological strategies used in neonates and children are:
Posture and mobilization: Mobilizations are applied using pillows or devices to help increase well-being [79]. This strategy is effective in term and preterm babies.
Breastfeeding or expressed breast milk: breastfeeding [82] is one of the most effective non-pharmacological strategies. Supplemental breast milk is less effective than breastfeeding and sucrose [83,84].
Oral sucrose and glucose [85]: It remains unclear whether sucrose suppresses the responses to pain. It should be administered 2 min before the procedure, and the effect lasts approximately 4 min [86].
Non-nutritive sucking [79], which can be achieved with a pacifier, breastfeeding after extraction or with the finger. It is effective in term and preterm babies.
Skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) [87], which is effective for pain relief in neonates.
Sensorial saturation [88], which results from multimodal sensory inputs (e.g., touch, massage, taste, voice and smell) during a painful procedure.
Distraction: attracting attention, keeping thoughts occupied and away from pain (music, images, games, etc.) [89].
Cognitive reformulation: in older children, recognize thoughts that increase pain and replace them with positive thoughts.
Music therapy [90]: it can improve heart rate, feeding and sucking in preterm infants.
Mother’s voice: some studies have demonstrated analgesic qualities in neonates that resulting from exposure to the mother’s voice [91].
Other measures studied for the relief pain include massage therapy [92], medical acupuncture [93,94], osteopathic manipulation [95] and radiant warming [96] or localized warming for painful procedures.
The main advantages of non-pharmacological treatments include ease of learning and performance, as well as safety and feasibility. However, no studies have been conducted to date analyzing the long-term effects of these techniques [81].

6.2. Pharmacological Analgesia

6.2.1. Concepts

The responsible physician must establish the treatment, depending on the age, type and intensity of the pain (Figure 1 and Figure 2), as well as the underlying disease, and assess the following aspects:
  • Patient’s age and associated pathology (cardiorespiratory, renal and hepatic function);
  • Check for interactions of analgesics with other medications the patient is receiving; and
  • Prevent and treat the most common side effects of analgesics [97].
An analgesic regimen and analgesic rescue should be prescribed according to the intensity of pain [98] (Figure 2). Pharmacotherapeutic protocols for pediatric pain need to be established according to intensity, age and the form of drug administration [99,100,101,102].

6.2.2. Pharmacological Analgesia in Neonates

The most used pharmacological analgesia in neonates are paracetamol, opioids and local anesthetics [44,103]. The doses and effects of most frequent drugs used in neonates are summarized in Table 5 [104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112].
Pharmacological pain management also involves risks of adverse effects, such as respiratory depression or neurotoxicity. This association is particularly evident for prolonged or repeated exposure to analgosedative drugs [38,104].
Opioids should not be administered routinely in neonates with mechanical ventilation, owing to the possible neurotoxicity of opioids in the developing brain [38,104,105,106]. Opioid administration should be based on clinical evaluation and scales [107]. The use of combined analgesic regimens permits a reduction in the dose of opioids by maintaining adequate analgesia with reduced frequency of side effects [107,108].
Current guidelines promote a pharmacological therapy administered in a stepwise approach, together with regular assessment of pain and sedation scores [53,109,110,111,112].

6.2.3. Pharmacological Analgesia in Children

A variety of analgesic drugs is available [113,114,115,116,117,118,119]. Table 6 summarizes the drugs, doses and effects of the most commonly used analgesics in pediatrics [98,99,100,101,108,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122]. Pharmacological analgesia in children depends on the procedure, kind and intensity of pain and the age of the patient (Table 7) [120,121,122].

6.3. Local Analgesia

Multiple formulations of topical anesthetics are available for use in children. The most used are included in Table 8 [123,124,125,126,127].

6.4. Other Methods

Patients with severe pain that is not well controlled despite powerful opioids at full dosages can become candidates for special anesthesia and regional analgesia techniques [94]. Patients with high tolerance to opioids, severe adverse effects, chest pain with respiratory compromise or chronic pain may also be candidates for these techniques.

6.4.1. PCA Pumps

From the age of 6–7 years, well-educated children with adequate cognitive abilities are able to self-administer analgesics by means of a PCA-programmed device [128]. The most commonly used modality in pediatrics is the mixed mode, whereby the pump administers a minimal basal continuous infusion, and if this is not sufficient, the patient can self-administer boluses until pain is eliminated or reduced. The system has important psychological advantages, especially for adolescents, by improving the perception of control over their own pain and reducing unnecessary analgesic consumption and side effects of opioid drugs. The most commonly used opioids in pediatrics are morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone and tramadol. In pediatric patients under 6 years of age or without adequate cognitive capacity, the “PCA by proxy” modality can be used, whereby the nurse administers the analgesic rescue boluses (“nurse PCA”) or even selected parents (“parent PCA”).

6.4.2. Regional and Interventional Analgesia Techniques

Regional techniques have been applied in children with satisfactory results [129,130,131]. The most common technique is epidural analgesia, which can be given at any level of the neuroaxis and which, by insertion of a catheter, allows analgesia to be maintained for several days or even weeks if necessary. In such cases, the catheter must be tunneled. Other catheter-based analgesia techniques, such as paravertebral, fascial and incisional analgesia use, have increased in popularity in pediatric patients [128] (Table 9). In all such techniques, local anesthetics are administered alone or in combination with adjuvants, such as opioids, clonidine, dexmedetomidine or corticosteroids, which enhance their duration and effect. Regional and invasive techniques provide pain elimination without causing CNS side effects, such as those produced by opioids.

7. Pain Assessment and Treatment Algorithm

The objective of the evaluation of pain and stress is to detect pain and determine the appropriate analgesic dose for each patient without side effects of treatment.
The first step to individualize the treatment of each patient is to implement a validated pain assessment tool, usually clinical scales (the fifth vital sign).
The second step is to evaluate other indicators of the patient, environment and therapies. To establish the treatment of pain, the assessment of pain, the environment, the individual characteristics of the patient, the underlying disease and other treatments must be taken into account.
It is not helpful to implement pain assessment as a stand-alone procedure. Therefore, pain assessment must be followed by a stepped treatment protocol adapted to the patient, as well as a structured follow-up and with multidisciplinary responsibility.
It is recommended to perform multimodal analgesia with non-pharmacological and/or pharmacological interventions. Subsequently, the patient must be re-evaluated to check the response and adjust the medications at the lowest dose necessary at each moment.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 summarize the algorithm for the assessment and treatment of pain in neonates and children.

8. Conclusions

Pain assessment is complicated, especially in neonates, infants and preschool-aged children. We recommend using clinical scales adapted to the age of the patient to assess and monitor the degree of pain in children.
We recommend multimodal analgesia with non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for pain treatment and the establishment of pharmacotherapeutic protocols for analgesia adjusted to the acute or chronic, type and intensity of pain, as well as the age of the patient. Patient-controlled analgesia is an adequate alternative for adolescents and older children in specific situations, such as after surgery. Patients with severe or persistent pain should be treated in consultation with specific pain services.
The follow-up of structured protocols will enable early diagnosis of pain and treatment adapted to the intensity and characteristics of the pain and of the child, which can reduce suffering and contribute improved prognosis.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization and writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by RETICS “Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II), funded by the PN I+D+i 2013–2016 (Spain), ISCIII-Sub-Directorate General for Research Assessment and Promotion and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. RD16/0022.

Acknowledgments

Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II)
Fetal authors
-
Garcia-Algar O, Neonatology Unit, ICGON, Hospital Clinic-Maternitat, BCNatal, Barcelona, Spain;
-
Andreu-Fernandez V, Grup de Recerca Infancia i Entorn (GRIE), Institut d’investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Madrid, Spain; Valencian International University (VIU), Valencia, Spain
-
Gomez-Roig MD, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain; BCNatal, Barcelona, Spain
-
Almeida L, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain; BCNatal, Barcelona, Spain.
Neonatal authors
-
Gerardo Rodríguez Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Spain
-
Iris Iglesia. Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Spain
-
María Cruz López Herrera. Department of Neonatology. Cruces University Hospital. Baracaldo (Vizcaya, Spain).
-
Margarita Ferrer. Department of Neonatology. Cruces University Hospital. Baracaldo (Vizcaya, Spain).
-
Fernando Cabañas Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology. Quironsalud Madrid University Hospital. Madrid
-
Manuela Lopez-Azorin. Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology. Quironsalud
-
Madrid University Hospital. Madrid
-
Carmen Pallas Alonso Department of Neonatology. 12 de Octubre University Hospital. Madrid.
-
Clara Alonso. Department of Neonatology. 12 de Octubre University Hospital. Madrid.
Pediatric authors
-
Santiago Mencía. Pediatric Intenisve Care Department. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón de Madrid.
-
Jesús López-Herce. Pediatric Intensive Care Department. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón de Madrid.
-
Raquel Cieza. Pediatric Intensive Care Department. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón de Madrid.
-
Jesús Cebrián. Sección de anestesia Pediátrica. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón de Madrid.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Treede, R.D. The International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: As valid in 2018 as in 1979, but in need of regularly updated footnotes. Pain Rep. 2018, 3, e643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bondesson, E.; Olofsson, T.; Caverius, U.; Schelin, M.E.C.; Jöud, A. Consultation prevalence among children, adolescents and young adults with pain conditions: A description of age- and gender differences. Eur. J. Pain 2020, 24, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Curtis, S.; Winger, A.; Ali, S. The Cochrane Library and procedural Pain in children: An overview of reviews. Evid. Based Child Health 2012, 7, 1363–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shah, P.; Siu, A. Considerations for neonatal and pediatric pain management. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2019, 76, 1511–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peng, P.; Stinson, J.N.; Choiniere, M.; Dion, D.; Intrater, H.; Lefort, S.; Lynch, M.; Ong, M.; Rashiq, S.; Tkachuk, G.; et al. Dedicated multidisciplinary pain management centres for children in Canada. Can. J. Anesth. 2007, 54, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Stevens, B.J.; Yamada, J.; Estabrooks, C.A.; Stinson, J.; Campbell, F.; Scott, S.D.; Cummings, G.; CIHR Team in Children’s Pain. Pain in hospitalized children: Effect of a multidimensional knowledge translation strategy on pain process and clinical outcomes. PAIN 2014, 155, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anand, K.J.; Hickey, P.R. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987, 317, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Derbyshire, S.W. Foetal pain? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 24, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anand, K.J.; Carr, D.B. The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of pain, stress, and analgesia in newborns and children. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 1989, 36, 795–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S.J.; Ralston, H.J.P.; Drey, E.A.; Partridge, J.C.; Rosen, M.A. Fetal pain: A systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence. JAMA 2005, 294, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lowery, C.L.; Hardman, M.P.; Manning, N.; Hall, R.W.; Anand, K.J.; Clancy, B. Neurodevelopmental changes of fetal pain. Semin. Perinatol. 2007, 31, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kanold, P.O.; Luhmann, H.J. The Subplate and Early Cortical Circuits. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 33, 23–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sekulic, S.; Gebauer-Bukurov, K.; Cvijanovic, M.; Kopitovic, A.; Ilic, D.; Petrovic, D.; Capo, I.; Pericin-Starcevic, I.; Christ, O.; Topalidou, A. Appearance of fetal pain could be associated with maturation of the mesodiencephalic structures. J. Pain Res. 2016, 9, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bouza, H. The impact of pain in the immature brain. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009, 22, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bellieni, C.V. New insights into fetal pain. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 24, 101001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reissland, N.; Francis, B.; Mason, J. Can healthy fetuses show facial expressions of “pain” or “distress”? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jardri, R.; Pins, D.; Houfflin-Debarge, V.; Chaffiotte, C.; Rocourt, N.; Pruvo, J.P.; Steinling, M.; Delion, P.; Thomas, P. Fetal cortical activation to sound at 33 weeks of gestation: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 42, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matuz, T.; Govindan, R.B.; Preissl, H.; Siegel, E.R.; Muenssinger, J.; Murphy, P.; Ware, M.; Lowery, C.L.; Eswaran, H. Habituation of visual evoked responses in neonates and fetuses: A MEG study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 2, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bellieni, C.V.; Sisto, R.; Cordelli, D.M.; Buonocore, G. Cry features reflect pain intensity in term newborns: An alarm threshold. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 55, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gingras, J.L.; Mitchell, E.A.; Grattan, K.E. Fetal homologue of infant crying. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005, 90, F415–F418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernardes, L.S.; Ottolia, J.F.; Cecchini, M.; de Amorim Filho, A.G.; Teixeira, M.J.; Francisco, R.P.V.; de Andrade, D.C.; Grupo de Estudo da Dor Fetal (Fetal Pain Study Group). On the feasibility of accessing acute pain–related facial expressions in the human fetus and its potential implications: A case report. Pain Rep. 2018, 3, e673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Petrikovsky, B.M.; Kaplan, G.P. Fetal responses to inadvertent contact with the needle during amniocentesis. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 1995, 10, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giannakoulopoulos, X.; Glover, V.; Sepulveda, W.; Kourtis, P.; Fisk, N.M. Fetal plasma cortisol and β-endorphin response to intrauterine needling. Lancet 1994, 344, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schuller, C.; Känel, N.; Müller, O.; Kind, A.B.; Tinner, E.M.; Hösli, I.; Zimmermann, R.; Surbek, D. Stress and pain response of neonates after spontaneous birth and vacuum-assisted and cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 207, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duci, M.; Pulvirenti, R.; Fascetti Leon, F.; Capolupo, I.; Veronese, P.; Gamba, P.; Tognon, C. Anesthesia for fetal operative procedures: A systematic review. Front. Pain Res. 2022, 3, 935427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Braden, A.; Maani, C.; Nagy, C. Anesthetic management of an ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure: A novel balanced approach. J. Clin. Anesth. 2016, 31, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kornacki, J.; Szydłowski, J.; Skrzypczak, J.; Szczepańska, M.; Rajewski, M.; Koziołek, A.; Gaca, M.; Wender-Ożegowska, E. Use of ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure in fetal neck and high airway anomalies–report of four clinical cases. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, G.; Li, L.; Tian, Y.; Xue, H.; Zhao, P. Influences of different doses of midazolam on mother and fetus in fetoscopic surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Pharmacology 2015, 96, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruano, R.; Yoshisaki, C.; Da Silva, M.; Ceccon, M.; Grasi, M.; Tannuri, U.; Zugaib, M. A randomized controlled trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion versus postnatal management of severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 39, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chmait, R.H.; Chon, A.H.; Anselmo, D.; Vanderbilt, D.L.; Townsend, J.; Julian-Wang, B.; Don, D. In utero fetal intubation for a large neck mass: A minimally invasive EXIT option. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2019, 45, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pedreira, D.A.; Zanon, N.; Nishikuni, K.; de Sá, R.A.M.; Acacio, G.L.; Chmait, R.H.; Kontopoulos, E.V.; Quintero, R.A. Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: The CECAM trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, e1–e111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Diguisto, C.; Winer, N.; Benoist, G.; Laurichesse-Delmas, H.; Potin, J.; Binet, A.; Lardy, H.; Morel, B.; Perrotin, F. In-utero aspiration vs expectant management of anechoic fetal ovarian cysts: Open randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 52, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Said, S.M.; Qureshi, M.Y.; Taggart, N.W.; Anderson, H.N.; O’Leary, P.W.; Cetta, F.; Alrahmani, L.; Cofer, S.A.; Segura, L.G.; Pike, R.B.; et al. Innovative 2-step management strategy utilizing EXIT procedure for a fetus with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2019, 94, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tkaczyk, M.; Stanczyk, M.; Krzeszowski, W.; Wojtera, J.; Litwinska, M.; Fortecka-Piestrzeniewicz, K.; Talar, T.; Pawlowska, B.; Olejniczak, D.; Podgorski, M.; et al. Neonatal survival and kidney function after prenatal interventions for obstructive uropathies. Ginekol. Pol. 2019, 90, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Baud, D.; Windrim, R.; Kachura, J.; Jefferies, A.; Pantazi, S.; Shah, P.; Langer, J.C.; Forsey, J.; Chaturvedi, R.R.; Jaeggi, E.; et al. Minimally invasive fetal therapy for hydropic lung masses: Three different approaches and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 42, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goksan, S.; Hartley, C.; Emery, F.; Cockrill, N.; Poorun, R.; Moultrie, F.; Rogers, R.; Campbell, J.; Sanders, M.; Adams, E.; et al. fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain. Elife 2015, 4, e08663.2. [Google Scholar]
  37. McPherson, C.; Miller, S.P.; El-Dib, M.; Massaro, A.N.; Inder, T.E. The influence of pain, agitation, and their management on the immature brain. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 88, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Doesburg, S.M.; Chau, C.M.; Cheung, T.P.; Moiseev, A.; Ribary, U.; Herdman, A.T.; Miller, S.P.; Cepeda, I.L.; Synnes, A.; Grunau, R.E. Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age. Pain 2013, 154, 1946–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ranger, M.; Chau, C.M.; Garg, A.; Woodward, T.S.; Beg, M.F.; Bjornson, B.; Poskitt, K.; Fitzpatrick, K.; Synnes, A.R.; Miller, S.P.; et al. Neonatal pain-related stress predicts cortical thickness at age 7 years in children born very preterm. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Moultrie, F.; Slater, R.; Hartley, C. Improving the treatment of infant pain. Curr. Opin. Support Paliat. Care 2017, 11, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tortora, D.; Severino, M.; Di Biase, C.; Malova, M.; Parodi, A.; Minghetti, D.; Traggiai, C.; Uccella, S.; Boeri, L.; Morana, G.; et al. Early Pain Exposure Influences Functional Brain Connectivity in Very Preterm Neonates. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vinall, J.; Miller, S.P.; Bjornson, B.H.; Fitzpatrick, K.P.; Poskitt, K.J.; Brant, R.; Synnes, A.R.; Cepeda, I.L.; Grunau, R.E. Invasive procedures in preterm children: Brain and cognitive development at school age. Pediatrics 2014, 133, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update. Pediatrics 2016, 137, e20154271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2001, 108, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Valdivieso Serna, A. Dolor agudo, analgesia y sedación en el niño (I): Detección y valoración. An. Esp. Pediatr. 1998, 48, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  46. Baarslag, M.A.; Jhingoer, S.; Ista, E.; Allegaert, K.; Tibboel, D.; van Dijk, M. How often do we perform painful and stressful procedures in the paediatric intensive care unit? A prospective observational study. Aust. Crit. Care. 2019, 32, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maxwell, L.G.; Fraga, M.V.; Malavolta, C.P. Assessment of pain in the newborn: An Update. Clin. Perinatol. 2019, 46, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Raeside, L. Physiologic measures of assessing infant pain: A literature review. Br. J. Nurs. 2011, 20, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Anand, K.J.S. Pain assessment in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2007, 119, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Anand, K.J.S. Assessment of Neonatal Pain. 2019. Available online: www.uptodate.com (accessed on 8 September 2022).
  51. Perry, M.; Tan, Z.; Chen, J.; Weidig, T.; Xu, W.; Cong, X.S. Neonatal Pain: Perceptions and Current Practice. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 30, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Giordano, V.; Edobor, J.; Deindl, P.; Wildner, B.; Goeral, K.; Steinbauer, P.; Werther, T.; Berger, A.; Olischar, M. Pain and Sedation Scales for Neonatal and Pediatric Patients in a Preverbal Stage of Development: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2019, 173, 1186–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Harris, J.; Ramelet, A.S.; Van Dick, M.; Pokorna, P.; Wielenga, J.; Tume, L.; Tibboel, D.; Ista, E. Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawall and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: An ESPINC position statement for health care professionals. Int. Care Med. 2016, 42, 972–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hicks, C.L.; von Baeyer, C.L.; Spafford, P.A.; van Korlaar, I.; Goodenough, B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: Toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001, 93, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Van Dijk, M.; de Boer, J.B.; Koot, H.M.; Duivenvoorden, H.J.; Passchier, J.; Bouw Meester, N.; Tibboel, D. The association between physiological and behavioral pain measures in 0 to 3 years old infants after major surgery. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2001, 22, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Voepel-Lewis, T.; Malviya, S.; Tait, A.R.; Merkel, S.; Foster, R.; Krane, E.J.; Davis, P.J. A comparison of clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment. Anesth. Analg. 2008, 106, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Geary, T.; Negus, A.; Anderson, B.; Zernikow, B. Perioperative management of the child on long-term opioids. Pediatric Anesthesia 2012, 22, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ramelet, A.S.; Rees, N.; McDonald, S.; Bulsara, M.; Abu-Saad, H.H. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Multidimensional Assessment of Pain Scale: MAPS. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2007, 17, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ledowski, T.; Averhoff, L.; Tiong, W.S.; Lee, C. Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) to predict intraoperative haemodynamic changes: Results of a pilot investigation. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2014, 58, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Migeon, A.; Desgranges, F.P.; Chassard, D.; Blaise, B.J.; De Queiroz, M.; Stewart, A.; Cejka, J.C.; Combet, S.; Rhondali, O. Pupillary reflex dilatation and analgesia nociception index monitoring to assess the effectiveness of regional anesthesia in children anesthetised with sevoflurane. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2013, 23, 1160–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Solana, M.J.; Lopez-Herce, J.; Fernandez, S.; Gonzalez, R.; Urbano, J.; Lopez, J.; Bellon, J.M. Assessment of pain in critically ill children. Is cutaneous conductance a reliable tool? J. Crit. Care 2015, 30, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tiryaki, Ö.; Doğu, Ö.; Okumuş, G.Y.; Tuna, A.T.; Bayar, F. Analgesia Nociception Index Monitoring in the Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Children: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study. J. Perianesth. Nurs. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, J.; Gadi, G.U.; Panigrahy, A.; Tam, E.W.Y. Using Neuroimaging to Study the Effects of Pain, Analgesia, and Anesthesia on Brain Development. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 2019, 31, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Williams, G. What dilemmas do healthcare workers face looking after children with acute pain? Pain Manag. 2017, 7, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lonnqvist, P.A. Pediatric pain review: What has happened since the First World Congress on Pediatric Pain in 1988? The past, the present and the future. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020, 86, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pitchon, D.N.; Dayan, A.C.; Schwenk, E.S.; Baratta, J.L.; Viscusi, E.R. Updates on Multimodal Analgesia for Orthopedic Surgery. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2018, 36, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gaglani, A.; Gross, T. Pediatric Pain Management. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 36, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dancel, R.; Liles, E.A.; Fiore, D. Acute Pain Management in Hospitalized Children. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2017, 12, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Williams, S.; Keogh, S.; Douglas, C. Improving paediatric pain management in the emergency department: An integrative literature review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019, 94, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Palmer, G.M. Pain management in the acute care setting: Update and debates. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2016, 52, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, P.; Yu, G. Non-pharmacological management for vaccine-related pain in children in the healthcare setting: A scoping review. J. Pain Res. 2022, 15, 2773–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pillai Riddell, R.R.; Racine, N.M.; Hennis, H.G.; Turcotte, K.; Uman, L.S.; Horton, R.E.; Kohut, S.A.; Stuart, J.H.; Stevens, B.; Lisi, D.M. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 12, CD006275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Keefe, K.R.; Byrne, K.J.; Levi, J.R. Treating pediatric post-tonsillectomy pain and nausea with complementary and alternative medicine. Laryngoscope 2018, 128, 2625–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Uman, L.S.; Chambers, C.T.; McGrath, P.J.; Kisely, S.R. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 10, CD005179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Bucsea, O.; Pillai Riddell, R. Non-pharmacological pain management in the neonatal intensive care unit: Managing neonatal pain without drugs. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 24, 101017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lester, B.M.; Hawes, K.; Abar, B.; Sullivan, M.; Miller, R.; Bigsby, R.; Laptook, A.; Salisbury, A.; Taub, M.; Lagasse, L.L. Single-family room care and neurobehavioural and medical outcomes in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2014, 134, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mangat, A.K.; Oei, J.L.; Chen, K.; Quah-Smith, I.; Schmölzer, G.M. A Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Pain Management in Newborn Infants. Children 2018, 5, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Shah, P.S.; Herbozo, C.; Aliwalas, L.L.; Shah, V.S. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, CD004950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Collados-Gómez, L.; Ferrera-Camacho, P.; Fernández-Serrano, E.; Camacho-Vicente, V.; Flores-Herrero, C.; García-Pozo, A.M.; Jiménez-García, R. Randomised crossover trial showed that using breast milk or sucrose provided the same analgesic effect in preterm infants of at least 28 weeks. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ou-Yang, M.C.; Chen, I.L.; Chen, C.C.; Chung, M.Y.; Chen, F.S.; Huang, H.C. Expressed breast milk for procedural pain in preterm neonates: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2013, 102, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Stevens, B.; Yamada, J.; Ohlsson, A.; Haliburton, S.; Shorkey, A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 7, CD001069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gao, H.; Gao, H.; Xu, G.; Li, M.; Du, S.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D. Efficacy and safety of repeated oral sucrose for repeated procedural pain in neonates: A systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016, 62, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Johnston, C.; Campbell-Yeo, M.; Disher, T.; Benoit, B.; Fernandes, A.; Streiner, D.; Inglis, D.; Zee, R. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2, CD008435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Locatelli, C.; Bellieni, C.V. Sensorial saturation and neonatal pain: A review. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2018, 31, 3209–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Li, T.; Fu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.E. Control effect of virtual reality technology on procedural pain in children’s wound: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2022, 101, e30961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. van der Heijden, M.J.; Oliai Araghi, S.; Jeekel, J.; Reiss, I.K.; Hunink, M.G.; van Dijk, M. Do hospitalized premature infants benefit from music interventions? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Chirico, G.; Cabano, R.; Villa, G.; Bigogno, A.; Ardesi, M.; Dioni, E. Randomised study showed that recorded maternal voices reduced pain in preterm infants undergoing heel lance procedures in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 2017, 106, 1564–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Juneau, A.L.; Aita, M.; Héon, M. Review and Critical Analysis of Massage Studies for Term and Preterm Infants. Neonatal Netw 2015, 34, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mitchell, A.J.; Hall, R.W.; Golianu, B.; Yates, C.; Williams, D.K.; Chang, J.; Anand, K.J. Does noninvasive electrical stimulation of acupuncture points reduce heelstick pain in neonates? Acta Paediatr. 2016, 105, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Feng, H.; König, J.; König, T.; Muensterer, O. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of magnetic acupuncture for supplementary analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cerritelli, F.; Cicchitti, L.; Martelli, M.; Barlafante, G.; Renzetti, C.; Pizzolorusso, G.; Lupacchini, M.; D’Orazio, M.; Marinelli, B.; Cozzolino, V.; et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment and pain in preterms: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015, 16, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Gray, L.; Garza, E.; Zageris, D.; Heilman, K.J.; Porges, S.W. Prevention and treatment of neonatal pain. Sucrose and warmth for analgesia in healthy newborns: An RCT. Pediatrics 2015, 135, e607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Turner, A.D.; Sullivan, T.; Drury, K.; Hall, T.A.; Williams, C.N.; Guilliams, K.P.; Murphy, S.; Iqbal O’Meara, A.M. Cognitive Dysfunction After Analgesia and Sedation: Out of the Operating Room and Into the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 713668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Berde, C.B.; Sethna, N.F. Drug therapy: Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1094–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Saini, A.; Maher, K.O.; Deshpande, S.R. Nonopioid analgesics for perioperative and cardiac surgery pain in children: Current evidence and knowledge gaps. Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2020, 13, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhu, A.; Benzon, H.A.; Anderson, T.A. Evidence for the Efficacy of Systemic Opioid-Sparing Analgesics in Pediatric Surgical Populations: A Systematic Review. Anesth. Analg. 2017, 125, 1569–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Poonai, N.; Zhu, R. Analgesia for Children in Acute Pain in the Post-codeine Era. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2018, 14, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Boric, K.; Dosenovic, S.; Jelicic, A.; Batinic, M.; Cavar, M.; Urlic, M.; Markovina, N.; Puljak, L. Interventions for postoperative pain in children: An overview of systematic reviews. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2017, 27, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hall, R.W.; Anand, K.J. Pain management in newborns. Clin. Perinatol. 2014, 41, 895–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Schiller, R.M.; Allegaert, K.; Hunfeld, M.; van den Bosch, G.E.; van den Anker, J.; Tibboel, D. Analgesics and Sedatives in Critically Ill Newborns and Infants: The Impact on Long-Term Neurodevelopment. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 58 (Suppl. S10), S140–S150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Valeri, B.O.; Holsti, L.; Linhares, M.B.M. Neonatal pain and developmental outcomes in children born preterm: A systematic review. Clin. J. Pain 2015, 31, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zwicker, J.G.; Miller, S.P.; Grunau, R.E.; Chau, V.; Brant, R.; Studholme, C.; Liu, M.; Synnes, A.; Poskitt, K.J.; Stiver, M.L.; et al. Smaller Cerebellar Growth and Poorer Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants Exposed to Neonatal Morphine. J. Pediatr. 2016, 172, 81–87.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Rana, D.; Bellflower, B.; Sahni, J.; Kaplan, A.J.; Owens, N.T.; Arrindell, E.L., Jr.; Talati, A.J.; Dhanireddy, R. Reduced narcotic and sedative utilization in a NICU after implementation of pain management guidelines. J. Perinatol. 2017, 37, 1038–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Thigpen, J.C.; Odle, B.L.; Harirforoosh, S. Opioids: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates, Infants, and Children. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2019, 44, 591–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. McPherson, C.; Ortinau, C.M.; Vesoulis, Z. Practical approaches to sedation and analgesia in the newborn. J. Perinatol. 2020, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ancora, G.; Lago, P.; Garetti, E.; Merazzi, D.; Savant Levet, P.; Bellieni, C.V.; Bellieni, C.V.; Pieragostini, L.; Pirelli, A. Evidence-based clinical guidelines on analgesia and sedation in newborn infants undergoing assisted ventilation and endotracheal intubation. Acta Paediatr. 2019, 108, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Squillaro, A.; Mahdi, E.M.; Tran, N.; Lakshmanan, A.; Kim, E.; Kelley-Quon, L.I. Managing Procedural Pain in the Neonate Using an Opioid-sparing Approach. Clin. Ther. 2019, 41, 1701–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Carbajal, R.; Eriksson, M.; Courtois, E. Sedation and analgesia practices in neonatal intensive care units (EUROPAIN): Results from a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 796–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Setlur, A.; Friedland, H. Treatment of pain with intranasal fentanyl in pediatric patients in an acute care setting: A systematic review. Pain Manag. 2018, 8, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Grunauer, M.; Mikesell, C.; Bustamante, G.; Cobo, G.; Sánchez, S.; Román, A.M.; Icaza-Freire, A.P.; Gavilanes, A.W.D.; Wang, N.E.; PICU-MIC Research Group. PICU-MIC Research Group. Pain Assessment and Management in Pediatric Intensive Care Units Around the World, an International, Multicenter Study. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 746489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Alanazi, E. The Effectiveness of Ketamine Compared to Opioid Analgesics for management of acute pain in Children in The Emergency Department: Systematic Review. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022, 61, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Valentine, K.; Kummick, J. Analgesia, Sedation, Paralytics, Delirium, and Iatrogenic Withdrawal. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 69, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Iqbal, A.U.; Shuster, M.E.; Baum, C.R. Ketofol for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Pediatric Population. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2022, 38, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Krmpotic, K.; Rieder, M.J.; Rosen, D. Recommendations for procedural sedation in infants, children, and adolescents. Paediatr. Child Health. 2021, 26, 128–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Egbuta, C.; Mason, K.P. Current State of Analgesia and Sedation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ramalho, C.E.; Bretas, P.M.C.; Schvartsman, C.; Reis, A.G. Sedation and analgesia for procedures in the pediatric emergency room. J. Pediatr. 2017, 93 (Suppl. S1), 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Daverio, M.; von Borell, F.; Ramelet, A.S.; Sperotto, F.; Pokorna, P.; Brenner, S.; Brenner, S.; Mondardini, M.C.; Tibboel, D.; Amigoni, A.; et al. Analgosedation CONSORTIUM on behalf of the Pharmacology Section and the Nurse Science Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care. Pain and sedation management and monitoring in pediatric intensive care units across Europe: An ESPNIC survey. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 88. [Google Scholar]
  118. Gupta, N.; Gupta, A.; Narayanan, M.R.V. Current status of nitrous oxide use in pediatric patients. World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2022, 11, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Foster, J.P.; Taylor, C.; Spence, K. Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2, CD010331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shahid, S.; Florez, I.D.; Mbuagbaw, L. Efficacy and safety of EMLA cream for pain control due to venipuncture in infants: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2019, 143, e20181173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Sharara-Chami, R.; Lakissian, Z.; Charafeddine, L.; Milad, N.; El-Hout, Y. Combination Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics 2017, 140, e20171935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kaur, H.; Negi, V.; Sharma, M.; Mahajan, G. Study of pain response in neonates during venipuncture with a view to analyse utility of topical anaesthetic agent for alleviating pain. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2019, 75, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Dilli, D.; İlarslan, N.E.; Kabataş, E.U.; Zenciroğlu, A.; Şimşek, Y.; Okumuş, N. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking goes some way to reducing pain during retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations. Acta Paediatr. 2014, 103, e76–e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Suresh, S.; Ecoffey, C.; Bosenberg, A.; Lonnqvist, P.A.; de Oliveira, G.S., Jr.; de Leon Casasola, O.; de Andrés, J.; Ivani, G. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Recommendations on Local Anesthetics and Adjuvants Dosage in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2018, 43, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Stein, A.L.; Baumgard, D.; Del Rio, I.; Tutiven, J.L. Updates in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia and Its Role in the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Ambulatory Setting. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2017, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Deer, J.D.; Sawardekar, A.; Suresh, S. Day surgery regional anesthesia in children: Safety and improving outcomes, do they make a difference? Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2016, 29, 691–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Vargas, A.; Sawardekar, A.; Suresh, S. Updates on pediatric regional anesthesia safety data. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2019, 32, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Álvarez-Baena, L.; Hervías, M.; Ramos, S.; Cebrián, J.; Pita, A.; Hidalgo, I. Continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia after minimally invasive atrial septal defect closure surgery in pediatric population: Effectiveness and safety analysis. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim. 2022, 69, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fernández, S.N.; Toledo, B.; Cebrián, J.; Pérez-Caballero, R.; López-Herce, J.; Mencía, S. Continuous Incisional Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients following Open Heart Surgery. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 1403539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. van Dijk, M.; Tibboel, D. Update on pain assessment in sick neonates and infants. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 59, 1167–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ventafridda, V.; Saita, L.; Ripamonti, C.; De Conno, F. WHO guidelines for the use of analgesics in cancer pain. React. Int. J. Tissue 1985, 7, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Algorithm for pain assessment and management in neonates.
Figure 1. Algorithm for pain assessment and management in neonates.
Children 09 01688 g001
Figure 2. The analgesic ladder proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for children [96].
Figure 2. The analgesic ladder proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for children [96].
Children 09 01688 g002
Table 1. Pain differences according to age.
Table 1. Pain differences according to age.
Neonates and InfantsChildrenAdults
Development of pain sensitivityYes, undefinedYes, definedYes, defined
Location of painNoNo;
Yes in older children
Yes
Verbal expressionCryVerbal;
Could be non-specific
Verbal and specific
Pain responseImportant and generalized
(tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension–hypotension, severe stress and agitation)
Important in toddlers;Moderate in older childrenMild
Difference between anxiety and painNoOnly older childrenYes
Clinical evaluationPhysiological scalesPhysiological and verbal scales, non-numericalNumerical scales
Analgesic drugsVery few studies;
Empirical off-label treatment for most drugs;
Undefined doses
Few studies;
Empirical off-label treatment for most drugs
Many studies;
Well-defined doses
Side effects of analgesic drugsSevere systemic side effects (bradycardia, hypotension and respiratory arrest)
Psychomotor development effect?
Moderate systemic side effects
Psychomotor development effect?
Mild systemic side effects
Table 2. Neonatal pain scales.
Table 2. Neonatal pain scales.
Pain ScaleGestational AgeParametersType of PainScale
Metric
PIPP-R (premature infant pain profile-revised)26 weeks to termHeart rate and oxygen saturation.
Alertness, brow bulge, eye squeeze and nasolabial furrow
Procedural and postoperative0–21
CRIES (cries, requires oxygen, increased vital signs, expression, sleeplessness)32–56 weeksBlood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation.
Cry, expression and sleeplessness
Postoperative0–10
NIPS (neonatal infant pain scale)28–38 weeksBreathing pattern.
Facial expression, cry, arms, legs and alertness
Procedural0–7
COMFORT neo24–42 weeksRespiratory response, blood pressure and heart rate.
Alertness, agitation, physical movements, muscle tone and facial tension
Prolonged8–40
NFCS (neonatal facial coding system)25 weeks to termBrow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow, open lips, stretched mouth, lip purse, taut tongue and chin quiverProcedural0–10
N-PASS (neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale)0–100 daysHeart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation.
Crying or irritability, behavior state, facial expression, extremities or tone
Acute and prolonged pain.
Also assesses sedation
Pain 0–10
Sedation
−10–0
EDIN (échelle de la douleur inconfort noveau-né)25–36 weeksFacial activity, body movements, quality of sleep, quality of contact with nurses and consolabilityProlonged0–15
BPSN (Bernese pain scale for neonates)27–41 weeksRespiratory pattern, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Alertness, duration of cry, time to calm, skin color, brow bulge with eye squeeze and postureProcedural0–27
Table 3. FLACC scale (face, leg, activity, cry, consolability).
Table 3. FLACC scale (face, leg, activity, cry, consolability).
012
FaceNo particular expression or smileOccasional grimace or frown, withdrawn, disinterested.Frequent to constant quivering chin, clenched jaw
LegsNormal position or relaxedUneasy, restless, tenseKicking or legs drawn up
ActivityCrying quietly, normal position, moves easily.Squirming, shifting back and forth, tense.Arched, rigid or jerking.
CryNo cry (awake or asleep)Moans or whimpers; occasional complaint.Crying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints.
ConsolabilityContent, relaxed.Reassured by occasional touching, hugging or being talk to; distractible.Difficult to console or comfort.
No pain, 0; mild pain, 1–2; moderate pain, 3–5; severe pain, 6–8; extreme–maximum pain, 9–10.
Table 4. MAPS scale (multidimensional assessment pain scale).
Table 4. MAPS scale (multidimensional assessment pain scale).
012
Vital signs: HR and/or BPWithin baselineMore than 10 bpm increase and/or more than 10 mmHg increaseMore than 10 bpm decrease and/or more than 10 mmHg decrease
Breathing patternNo changeDevelopment or increase in respiratory distressSevere respiratory distress
Facial expressionRelaxedGrimaceGrimace associated with silent or weak cry
Body movementsNo movements or purposeful movementsRestlessRigid and/or limited body movements
State of arousalCalm or asleepHyperreactiveShut down
No pain, 0; mild pain, 1–2; moderate pain, 3–5; severe pain, 6–8; extreme–maximum pain, 9–10.
Table 5. Pharmacological agents for neonatal pain management.
Table 5. Pharmacological agents for neonatal pain management.
DrugDosePharmacologyIndicationsAdverse Effects
MorphineBoluses: 30–50 mcg/kg, maximum 100 mcg/kg over 15–30 min
Infusion: 30–100 mcg/kg bolus followed by 10 mcg/kg/h
A lower initial dose is recommended.
Therapeutic hypothermia:
Bolus of 50 mcg/kg, followed by 5 mcg/kg/h infusion
Action of 5 min. Peak effectiveness: 15 min.
Half-life:
6–12 h
Analgesia and sedation in mechanical ventilation;
postoperative pain control;
sedation during therapeutic hypothermia.
Not be used in preterm infants less than 27 weeks
and neonates with hemodynamic instability
Hypotension, respiratory arrest, urinary retention, tolerance, withdrawal, risk of periventricular leukomalacia and/or death;
poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes
FentanylBolus of 0.5–2.0 μg/kg
Infusion: 0.5–2.0 μg/kg/h
Preterm neonates born before 32 w g reduced by 50% during days 0–4,
Therapeutic hypothermia
1–2 mcg/kg over one hour and then infusion to 0.5–1 mcg/kg/h
Action of 1–2 min.
Duration of action: 60 min.
Half-life:
3.1–9.5 h
Short procedures.
Analgesia and sedation in mechanical ventilation;
sedation during therapeutic hypothermia
Respiratory arrest, chest wall rigidity, laryngospasm,
tolerance
withdrawal,
delayed meconium passage.
Cerebellar hypoplasia; decrease in eye and hand coordination skills at two years
RemifentanilEndotracheal intubation:1–2 μg/kg.
Percutaneous central venous catheter: 0.25 μg/kg/min
Sedation and analgesia in mechanical ventilation: 0.15 μg/kg/min
Action: 1 min
Half-life:
3.5–5 min.
Short procedures: endotracheal intubation,
laser surgery for retinopathy of prematurity
Bradycardia, hypotension, chest wall rigidity, tolerance and withdrawal;
no studies of long-term outcome in neonates
ParacetamolOral dose:
25 mg/kg/day in at 30 w, 45 mg/kg/day at 34 w, 60 mg/kg/day in term n
Intravenous:
20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by a 10 mg/kg maintenance dose every six hours.
28 to 31 wg, to 12 h
IV action: 5 min. Peak effectiveness: 15 min
Oral peak effectiveness: 1 h
Enteral and rectal: variable absorption
Mild to moderate pain;reduction in morphine
requirements after major surgery
Hardly causes hepatic or renal toxicity in newborns;
minor hemodynamic effects have been found following IV;
Following neonatal exposure to paracetamol remains limited;
possible link with risks for atopy, fertility and neurobehavioral problems
DexmedetomidineBolus 0.05–0.2 mg/kg over 15 min followed by maintenance 0.47 ± 0.21 mg/kg/h
Therapeutic hypothermia
0.3 mcg/kg/h (range 0.2–0.5 mcg/kg/h)
Half-life: 7.6 h preterm
and 3.2 h in term infants
Alternative agent for sedation in mechanical ventilation.
Sedation of term neonates during therapeutic hypothermia; no studies in neonates
Hypotension and bradycardia generally self-limiting; reduced dosed
withdrawal (weaned by decreasing the infusion by 0.1 mcg/kg/h every 12 to 24 h)
KetamineBolus 1–2 mg/kgAction:1–2 min;
short duration:15–30 min.
Short painful procedures;
hemodynamically unstable patients; no studies in neonates
Possible
Neurotoxicity;
no studies of long-term outcome in neonates
Table 6. Most commonly used analgesic drugs in pediatrics.
Table 6. Most commonly used analgesic drugs in pediatrics.
DrugDoseIndicationsComments and Main Side Effects
Acetaminophenpo/pr: 5–10 mg/kg/h
IV: 10–15 mg/kg/6 h (<10 kg: 7.5 mg/kg/6 h)
<1 year: 7.5 mg/kg
Moderate pain
Hyperthermia
-
Hepatotoxicity
Ibuprofenpo: 5–10 mg/kg/6 h
IV: 5–10 mg/kg/6 h
Moderate pain
Hyperthermia
-
Of choice in children
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Metamizolepo: 10–15 mg/kg/6–8 h
IV: 10–20 mg/kg/6–8 h
Moderate–severe pain
Hyperthermia
-
Synergistic effect with opioids
-
Bone marrow aplasia
Dexketoprofenpo: 0.5–1 mg/kg/8 h
IV/im: 10–40 mg/kg/8 h
Moderate–severe pain
Anti-inflammatory
-
Not recommended for children under 12 years of age
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Ketorolacpo: 0.5 mg/kg/6–8 h
IV, im: 0.2–1 mg/kg/6–8 h
Moderate–severe pain
Anti-inflammatory
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding
-
Nephrotoxicity
Naproxenpo/pr/im: 5 mg/kg/8–12 hMild–moderate pain
Anti-inflammatory
-
Not recommended for children under 12 years of age
-
No IV
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Diclofenacpo: 0.5–1.5 mg/kg/8 hMild–moderate pain
Spasmolytic
-
Spasmolytic effect
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Tramadolpo/pr/sc: 1–2 mg/kg/4–6 h
iv: 1–2 mg/kg/4–6 h
Acute pain
-
Good hemodynamic tolerability
-
Less respiratory effect
MeperidineIV/im/sc: 0.5–2 mg/kg/4–6 hAcute pain
Spasmolytic
-
Constipation
-
Urinary retention
Morphinepo: 0.2–0.5 mg/kg/6–8 h IV/im/sc: 0.1–0.2 mg/kg/4–6 h
CII: 10–50 mcg/kg/h
Analgosedation in conventional mechanical ventilation
Acute or chronic pain
Pulmonary edema
-
Dose adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
-
Release of histamine, nausea, vomiting and respiratory arrest
FentanylIV/sc/sl/in: 1–3 mcg/kg
CII: 1–10 mcg/kg/h
Procedural pain
Analgosedation in conventional mechanical ventilation
Acute or chronic pain
Pulmonary edema
-
Long elimination
-
Improved cardiocirculatory stability
-
Chest stiffness and respiratory arrest
Nitrous oxide20–70% with oxygenProcedural pain
Endoscopy and venipunctures
Nausea, vomiting
Myocardial dysfunctionNeurodevelopment effects?
po: per os; pr: per rectal; in: intranasal; sl: sublingual; sc: subcutaneous; IV: intravenous infusion; CII: continuous intravenous infusion.
Table 7. Pain treatment according to intensity and patient age.
Table 7. Pain treatment according to intensity and patient age.
AgeMild PainModerate PainSevere Pain
<1 year oldAdequate oral tolerance
-
Ibuprofen 2%: 4–10 mg/kg/oral 8 h
-
Rescue
(a)
Acetaminophen 100 mg/mL: 10 mg/kg/6–8 h/oral
(b)
Metamizole: 12.5 mg/kg/8 h (max 500 mg/dose)
No oral tolerance
-
Acetaminophen IV: 7.5–10 mg/kg/6–8 h
-
Rescue:
Metamizole: 20 mg/kg/IV/8 h
Adequate oral tolerance
-
Ibuprofen 2%: 4–10 mg/kg/oral 8 h + acetaminophen 100 mg/mL: 10 mg/kg/6–8 h/oral.
-
Rescue:
Metamizole: 20 mg/kg/8 h (max 500 mg/dose).
No oral tolerance
-
Acetaminophen IV: 7.5–10 mg/kg/iv/6–8 h + metamizole: 20 mg/kg/IV/8 h
-
Rescue: pethidine 0.5 mg/kg/IV/6 h
Intravenous
-
Metamizole 100 mg/kg/IV/24 h CII + morphine: 0.1–0.25 mg/kg/IV/6 h
-
Rescue:
(a)
Acetaminophen 7.5–10 mg/kg/IV/6 h
(b)
PCA IV: fentanyl + metamizole
Continuous respiratory rate and oximetry monitoring
>1 year oldAdequate oral tolerance
-
Ibuprofen 2%: 4–10 mg/kg/oral 8 h
-
Rescue:
(a)
Acetaminophen 100 mg/mL: 10–15 mg/kg/6–8 h/oral
(b)
Metamizol: 12.5 mg/kg/8 h (max 500 mg/dose)
No oral tolerance
-
Acetaminophen IV: 10–15 mg/kg/6–8 h
-
Rescue:
Metamizol IV 20 mg/kg/8 h
Adequate oral tolerance
-
Ibuprofen 2%: 4–10 mg/kg/oral 8 h + acetaminophen (100 mg/mL): 15 mg/kg/6–8 h/oral.
-
Rescue
(a)
Metamizole: 20 mg/kg/8 h (max 500 mg/dose).
(b)
Tramadol 1 mg/kg/6 h (max 8 mg/kg/24 h)
No oral tolerance
-
Acetaminophen IV 10–15 mg/kg/6 h + metamizol IV 20–40 mg/kg/8 h
-
Rescue:
(a)
Morphine 0.1–0.25 mg/kg/IV/6 h
(b)
Pethidine 0.5 mg/kg/IV/6 h
Intravenous
-
Metamizole 120 mg/kg/IV/CII in 24 h + morphine: 0.1–0.25 mg/kg/6h
-
Rescue
(a)
Acetaminophen 15 mg/kg/IV/6 h
(b)
PCA IV fentanyl + metamizole
Continuous respiratory rate and pulse oximetric monitoring.
Table 8. Local analgesia in newborns and children.
Table 8. Local analgesia in newborns and children.
DrugDoseIndicationsAdverse Effects
EMLA (lidocaine 2.5%-prilocaine 2.5%).0.5 g to 1.0 g applied to the procedural site; anesthesia within 60–90 minLumbar puncture,
venipuncture,
circumcision
Methemoglobinemia
Tetracaine gel.Applied to the procedural siteIntramuscular injection and heel sticksTransient local erythema
Liposomal lidocaine 4% cream (LMX4)Applied to the procedural site; anesthesia within 30 minVenipuncture, skin biopsies, lesion removal and electrocauteryNo risk of methemoglobinemia
LidocaineSubcutaneous infiltration;
0.5 mL/kg of 1% or 0.25 mL/kg of 2%
Lumbar puncture, circumcision, percutaneous venous or arterial catheter placementIn neonates, avoid combination with epinephrine (risk of tissue necrosis and tachyarrhythmias)
Proparacaine anesthetic eye drops (alcaine) 0.5%30 s before eye examinationRetinopathy of prematurity screeningEye redness
Table 9. Interventional techniques for pediatric pain.
Table 9. Interventional techniques for pediatric pain.
TechniquePediatric ExperienceIndicationsGuided
Neuroaxial blockVery extensiveOncological pain, neuropathic pain, complex regional pain, refractive phantom limbLoss of resistance
US, Radioscopy
Peripheral nerve blockExtensiveOncological pain, neuropathic pain, complex regional pain, refractive phantom limb
Chronic abdominal wall pain
US
Electric stimulation
Sympathetic blockLess extensiveComplex regional pain, herpes, visceral painUS, Radioscopy
Major occipital nerveLess extensiveOccipital neuralgia, post-traumatic headache, migraineUS
Fascial blocks:
TPA (transversal plane abdomen), rectus fascia, iliac fascia, and ilioinguinal fascia
Less extensiveAbdominal wall pain
Post herniorrhaphy neuralgia
Cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome
Myofascial pain
US
IV block (Bier)Less extensiveNeuropathic pain, complex regional pain
Chemical neurolysisShort experienceOncological pain
spasticity
Radioscopy, US
RadiofrequencyShort experienceRefractory neuropathic pain, joint pain, oncological pain
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS);
spinal cord,
brain
Very extensive
Less extensive;
very short experience
Neuropathic pain, complex regional painRadioscopy, US
Radioscopy + surgery
Intrathecal baclofenExtensiveInfantile spastic cerebral palsy, dystoniaRadioscopy, US
Intra-articularExtensiveJuvenile idiopathic rheumatoid arthritis, spondylitisUS
CAT: US: Ultrasound.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mencía, S.; Alonso, C.; Pallás-Alonso, C.; López-Herce, J.; Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II). Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in Fetuses, Neonates and Children. Children 2022, 9, 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111688

AMA Style

Mencía S, Alonso C, Pallás-Alonso C, López-Herce J, Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II). Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in Fetuses, Neonates and Children. Children. 2022; 9(11):1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mencía, Santiago, Clara Alonso, Carmen Pallás-Alonso, Jesús López-Herce, and Maternal and Child Health and Development Network II (SAMID II). 2022. "Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in Fetuses, Neonates and Children" Children 9, no. 11: 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111688

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop