Next Article in Journal
Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Developmental Age: 22-Item Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire for an Observational Descriptive Investigation
Next Article in Special Issue
Stress and Anxiety among High School Adolescents: Correlations between Physiological and Psychological Indicators in a Longitudinal Follow-Up Study
Previous Article in Journal
Body Image and Lifestyle Behaviors in High School Adolescents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Self-Compassion and Anxiety in Adolescents with and without Anxiety Disorder
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/children10071264
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Depression Disorders in Mexican Adolescents: A Predictive Model

by
Gilda Gómez-Peresmitré
* and
Romana Silvia Platas-Acevedo
Faculty of Psychology, The National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. Universidad 3004 Col Copilco-Universidad, Alcaldía, Coyoacán, México City C.P. 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(7), 1264; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071264
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 15 July 2023 / Published: 22 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Children and Adolescents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Depression is a type of mood disorder that can impact individuals of any age. A variety of factors, including biological, psychological, and environmental factors, can contribute to the likelihood of developing depression. If the environment in which a person exists does not support its occurrence, the disorder may not manifest. The current research follows a retrospective, correlational approach, utilizing a non-probability sample of 557 high school students from public schools in Mexico City. This sample includes 181 males and 376 females, aged between 15 and 18 years, with an average age of 15.66 and a standard deviation of 0.68. The main objective of this research is to identify the variables that serve as risk factors for the development of depressive disorders in Mexican adolescents in high school. The data show that 78% of the adolescents in the total sample were at risk of depression, which is consistent with what has been reported by other researchers. The regression model shows that alcohol and drug consumption is associated with and influences the emergence and presence of depressive symptomatology and major depressive disorder. Adolescents with different sexual orientations than heterosexuals are twice as likely to suffer depression and emotional dysregulation. It was confirmed that the developmental stage and adolescence contributes as a context that favors the evolution of such a symptomatology.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Depression, a mood disorder, has the potential to impact individuals of all ages. According to the World Health Organization [1], in 2020, symptoms of depression include persistent sadness, irritability, a sense of emptiness, and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities, experienced throughout most of the day, almost every day, for at least two weeks. Additional indications include difficulty concentrating, overwhelming feelings of guilt or diminished self-worth, thoughts of death or suicide, changes in appetite or weight, and feelings of fatigue or reduced energy levels.
The emergence of a depressive disorder can be influenced by various factors, including biological, psychological, and environmental elements that contribute to its development; although it is true that there is a genetic and hereditary part, this disorder may not develop if the environment in which the person is immersed does not favor it. Research conducted on twins indicates that approximately 40% to 50% of the risk for developing depression can be attributed to genetic factors. Similarly, studies involving families demonstrate that individuals with first-degree relatives who have experienced depression are two to three times more likely to develop depression themselves at some stage in their lives, compared to individuals without a family history of the disorder [2].
Historically, it has been seen that women tend to present depression more often than men, with a 2:1 ratio [3]; in addition, gender and life cycle issues that are present in women may increase the probability of developing depression at some point in life. Biological factors, such as the fluctuation of hormones in deciding cycles, including menstruation and menopause, have weight in the appearance of depressive symptoms or emotional reactions to stressful situations in life [4]. The different socio-contextual situations to which women are exposed compared to men should also be considered. Gender roles, physical and sexual abuse, and the entry into the labor field, formerly monopolized by men, which favors unequal power relations [5]. These are some of the daily situations that women face, and from which depressive symptoms can be triggered.
Violence is a perfect example to understand the impact of these social conditions in which some women live and how they affect mental health. Vázquez Machado [6] conducted a study with 64 depressed women and 32 women without any disorder. The results showed that 67.2% of the depressed women had previously (12 months maximum) suffered some episode of violence (physical or psychological), and when comparing the two groups with an odds ratio, researchers discovered that individuals who had experienced recent abuse were 6.17 times more probably to exhibit clinical depression compared to those without such a history.
The cultural structures and lives in which people are immersed from birth have consequences for the way they cope with life. In a study conducted by Rodríguez [7], it was seen that the perception of social support received can contribute considerably to depressive symptomatology. Children who received low social support had much lower positive self-esteem than children who received high social support; the latter not only had higher positive self-esteem but also showed a more positive mood [8].
Socioeconomic status has also been associated with depressive symptomatology. Ferrel et al. [9] studied the relationship between the socioeconomic status of a sample of college students and the level of depression. They concluded that socioeconomic status appears as a fundamental triggering factor of this disease. Rodríguez [7] saw that the low structural support that can be received by lower socioeconomic classes can also generate lower positive self-esteem, positive mood, energy–interest and self-esteem compared to the middle-class population that was studied.
According to another study carried out by Álvarez et al. [10], higher percentages of depression—minimal, moderate, and severe—were seen in children from rural areas rather than in urban children. González et al. [11], in turn, showed that negative characteristics observed at school, with friends, and in the neighborhood function as risk factors for depressive symptomatology, as well, possibly, for poor emotional self-regulation.
Family structure can condition health aspects in such a subtle way that it is impossible to perceive it without a critical eye. Large sectors of the population find themselves in living conditions that lead to stressful situations (economic, family problems, etc.), while they do not realize that they receive any external support to cope with these situations.
Adolescence is presented as a stage where multiple changes occur (physical, psychological, cognitive, identity, etc.). During this transitional phase of adolescence, where individuals undergo numerous personal transformations and encounter external pressures associated with their environment, it is not surprising to observe the emergence of emotional issues. Álvarez et al. [10] mention that the family climate and available resources that support young people are related to depressive symptomatology; thus, within a cohesive, expressive, and organized family, and where all members are encouraged to be independent and close to others, it is exceedingly difficult for emotional maladjustment to occur. This same study showed that there is an inversely proportional correlation among family conflicts, which lead to worse family cohesion and depressive symptoms in adolescents; therefore, the family support provided to adolescents can work in two ways: either as a protective factor that helps to prevent a depressive disorder or as a risk factor by provoking these symptoms.
Eating disorders can be associated with challenges in emotional regulation among adults [12] and adolescents of all genders [13]. Both boys and girls exhibit diverse ways of expressing their emotions, with girls more inclined to internalize positive emotions, whereas boys often externalize their emotions [14]. However, like eating disorders, most studies on emotional dysregulation have primarily focused on mothers and daughters. These studies have found that children of depressed mothers are more prone to using unhealthy strategies to regulate their emotions compared to children of nondepressed mothers [14,15]. Nevertheless, similar to eating disorders, the majority of research investigating emotional dysregulation has predominantly centered on mothers and daughters. These studies have revealed that the offspring of mothers experiencing depression are more susceptible to adopting unhealthy mechanisms for regulating their emotions compared to children of nondepressed mothers [14,15]. Furthermore, it has been observed that in middle childhood and adolescence, the capacity of a child to regulate their emotions seems to be more impacted by their mother’s aptitude for emotional regulation rather than their father’s [16]. Additionally, research indicates that mothers and fathers play distinct roles in shaping their children’s ability to regulate their emotions. They respond in distinct ways when faced with their children’s challenging behaviors, thereby making unique contributions to the development of their children’s emotional regulation skills [17,18].
Another cause of depression is the abuse of addictive substances; between 30% and 50% of psychiatric patients are drug-dependent, and among adolescents with substance abuse, 70% of those surveyed suffer from anxiety and/or depression. The use of alcohol, a substance known as a depressant drug, is used by approximately 40% of young people, mostly males. The relationship between alcoholism and depression does not have a clear cause; it seems that each alcohol could produce certain depressive symptoms and depression can lead to abuse and dependence on these substances [19]. Depression and alcohol consumption in adolescents are intricately connected issues with significant implications for their well-being. There are various underlying factors that contribute to the co-occurrence of depression and alcohol consumption in this population, including genetic predispositions, shared environmental influences (such as family or peer factors), neurobiological factors, and psychological vulnerabilities [20,21].
It is widely seen that depression and alcohol consumption often coexist in adolescents, and research supports a bidirectional relationship between the two. Adolescents experiencing depression may turn to alcohol as a means of coping with their emotional distress. Conversely, excessive alcohol consumption can contribute to the onset or worsening of depressive symptoms in susceptible individuals [22].
Studies have consistently proved that adolescents with depression are at a heightened risk of engaging in problematic alcohol consumption compared to their nondepressed peers. Furthermore, the presence of both depression and alcohol consumption in adolescents is associated with more severe symptoms of both conditions, increased functional impairment, and an elevated risk of developing other mental health disorders [23].
A study carried out by Córdova et al. [24], conducted on 323 participants between 12 and 18 years of age, who were drug users, concluded that depression is a strong predictor of substance abuse in both men and women. The greater the number of depressive symptoms, the greater the severity and intensity of substance use. Risk eating behavior (REB) is a group of abnormal behaviors related to food intake and is associated with social isolation, depressive symptoms, anxiety, substance problems, identity problems, and high impulsivity, among others [19].
In a study conducted with 892 students in Mexico, it was shown that depression increases 3.4 times the risk of having moderate REB and 8.1 of suffering from high REB, while depression and figure preoccupation increased the risk of REB by 3.14 for moderate REB and 2.95 times of suffering from high REB [25]. According to the American Psychological Association (APA), sexual orientation refers to a lasting emotional, romantic, or sexual attraction an individual experiences towards others. Sexual orientation exists along a spectrum, ranging from exclusive heterosexuality to various forms of bisexuality [26]. Studies have shown that women and individuals belonging to sexual minorities, which encompass all sexual orientations apart from heterosexuality, are twice as prone to experiencing depression compared to heterosexual men [27]. Some studies [28] refer that these disparities in depression appear to be more pronounced among heterosexual men. Other studies involving LGBT youth show elevated scores of emotional distresses, emotional dysregulation, self-injurious, and suicidal ideation in contrast to heterosexual youth [29].
Other authors [30] suggest that young people resort to self-injury as an emotional response. This is related to a deficiency in the management of proper emotional regulation strategies. According to Klonsky [31], self-injury is identified as a coping mechanism that assists in reducing the intensity of overwhelming negative emotions, such as feelings of sadness and loneliness. Some worldwide surveys report high comorbidity between anxiety and depression disorders [32]. This comorbidity is detected more among adolescents, where between 25% and 50% of young people with depression present, in turn, and symptoms of anxiety [33]. In Mexico, there have been few studies on the evaluation of the variables that are involved in the development and maintenance of depression. The aim of the present study was the identification of risk factors for the development of depression in Mexican adolescents in high school.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample

The design of the current study involved a cross-sectional, correlational approach utilizing a non-probability sample of n = 557 high school students (181 males and 376 females) from public schools in Mexico. The participants’ age ranged from 15 to 18 years, with a mean age of 15.66 and a standard deviation of 0.68.

2.2. Instrument

In the study, researchers used scales from the Online Test for Self-Screening: Risk Factors of Eating Disorders, Depression, Social Anxiety, and Self-Injury (OTESSED) [34]. The test comprised several sections, starting with a sociodemographic section that gathered information on factors such as age, employment, parents’ educational level, sexual orientation, alcohol consumption at home, and family communication. The next section was the Depression and Suicidal Ideation Scale, which consisted of 11 multiple-choice questions ranging from “never” to “always”. The scale’s reliability coefficient was ϖ = 0.86 (α = 0.91) for men and ϖ = 0.89 (α = 0.92) for women, indicating good internal consistency. The Risk Factors Associated with Eating Disorders Scale (EFRATA) section included 11 items with response options ranging from “never” (1) to “always” (5). A higher score on this scale indicated a greater problem. The reliability coefficient for this section was ϖ = 0.88 (α = 0.71) for males and ϖ = 0.84 (α = 0.82) for females, demonstrating good reliability. The Social Anxiety Scale section consisted of 12 items with multiple-choice responses ranging from “never” to “always” This scale aimed to measure levels of social anxiety, and its reliability coefficients were ϖ = 0.88 (α = 0.90) for men and ϖ = 0.87 (α = 0.87) for women, indicating good internal consistency. The Emotional Dysregulation section assessed the regulation of positive and negative emotions using 14 items. The reliability coefficients for this section were ϖ = 0.75 (α = 0.82) for both men and women ϖ = 0.75 (α = 0.84), indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, these scales from the online test demonstrated good to acceptable reliability coefficients across the various sections, allowing for the assessment of self-reported risk factors for eating disorders, depression, and social anxiety.

2.3. Procedure

The administrators of multiple high school campuses were approached to request the participation of their students in the study. Students who agreed to participate received a link to the research instrument through email. In order to ensure ethical standards, informed consent was obtained from both the school authorities acting as legal guardians and the participants themselves. The study followed the guidelines outlined in the Helsinki Declaration and adhered to the General Health Law on Research that governs the country where the study took place. As the research was considered to be low risk, it received approval from the ethics committee of the Faculty of Psychology (Psychology (FPCE_08032021_H_AC 27 April 2021).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The study utilized the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences [SPSS], V. 22 (IBM, MEXICO) for the data analysis. To figure out the variability of the responses obtained, the percentage distribution was analyzed using frequencies. Likewise, the criteria for the normality skewness (symmetry +/−1.5) and kurtosis (+/−2) were obtained for each item considering the criteria suggested by Potthat [35]. The results confirmed that all of the items had a good index of variability and normality in the responses. Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted to establish the relationships among the variables and to further conduct a linear regression analysis with depression as the dependent variable. Additionally, a binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the predictor variables. The AMOS statistical package was used to estimate the effect and relationships among the multiple variables through structural modeling.

3. Results

The questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic information from the participants, supplying information on the population studied. The responses to the data obtained are presented below (See Table 1).

3.1. Pearson’s Correlation

To assess the relationships among the study variables, including depression, risky eating behavior, anxiety, emotional dysregulation, sexual orientation, frequency of alcohol and drug consumption at home, and frequency of drug and alcohol use at school, a Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted.
The results showed moderate correlation coefficients for the variables depression, REB, dysregulation, and anxiety, while for the variable anxiety the correlation was high (0.60) (See Table 2) [36].
Before constructing the structural model, a multiple linear regression model was employed to determine the weight and direction of the independent variables and their impact on predicting the dependent variable. The enter method was utilized, with depression as the dependent variable, and the independent or predictor variables included risky eating behavior, anxiety, dysregulation, sexual orientation, violence, and family factors, as well as drug and alcohol consumption both at home and at school.
The Table 3 below displays the coefficients of determination and multiple correlation coefficients between depression (i.e., dependent variable) and the other independent variables (IVs).
According to the data from the regression model (Enter method), the behaviors of depression, anxiety, dysregulation, family violence, sexual orientation, and alcohol and drug use at home and at school had a coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.28).

3.2. Logistic Regression

To identify the risk predictors, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact or influence of the studied variables as predictors of depression. The dependent variable in this analysis was the presence or absence of the risk of depression, while the independent or predictor variables included risky eating behavior, anxiety, family violence, dysregulation, sexual orientation, and alcohol and drug consumption.
As can be seen in Table 4, the variable depression presented a medium effect in its relationship with REB, presenting two times (OR (95% CI) = 2.03 (1.2–3.28)) more probability of this behavior occurring. The OR value of the rest of the variables shows, in each case, a medium effect. For the variable anxiety, it is 3.2 times more likely to occur when there is depression (OR (95% CI) = 3.24 (1.9–5.4)). For the variable emotional dysregulation, there is a 2.9 times greater probability of occurrence (OR (95% CI) = 2.90 (1.7–4.8)) when there is depression. In relation to sexual orientation, there is a 3.6 times greater probability of depression when it is different from a heterosexual orientation (OR (95% CI) = 3.6 (1.8–7.3)). For the variable violence in the family, there is a 0.44 (OR (95% CI) = 0.44 (0.22–0.86)) probability of depression. For the variable alcohol and drugs at school, there is a 0.48 times greater probability that this behavior is related to depression. With regard to alcohol and drugs, there is 0.30 greater probability (OR (95% CI) = 0.30 (0.15–0.61)). The logistic regression model explained 40% of the variance (R2 Nagelkerke = 0.40), and it correctly classified 84% of the adolescents with depression, with a higher probability of correct classification in adolescents classified as at risk of depression (95%) than in adolescents without depression (40%).

3.3. Structural Model

The structural model predictive for depression showed adequate levels for the goodness of fit (Figure 1), with acceptable p-values > 0.95 (CFI, GFI, TLI, and IFI), as well as RMSEA and SMRR < 0.05 [37,38]. The anxiety variable presented a β = 0.60, the emotional dysregulation variable a β = 0.47, REB β = 0.35, and sexual orientation β = 0.25. With respect to the values for the explained variance, the squared correlations reported for the variable anxiety were an R2 = 0.36, for the variable depression an R2 = 0.27, dysregulation an R2 = 0.22, and REB an R2 = 0.15.

4. Discussion

The main objective of this research was the identification of variables that are risk factors for the development of depressive disorders in Mexican adolescents in high school. After analyzing the data, it was found that 78% of the adolescents in the entire sample were identified as being at risk of experiencing depression. This result aligns with previous studies conducted by Ibrahim et al. [39,40] and other researchers.
Several predictors (anxiety, REB, sexual orientation, and drug use among others) related to the presence of depression in adolescents were considered. The results of the regression model show how drug and alcohol use influence the presence of depression, which has been highlighted in several studies, e.g., Contreras-Olive [41] and Restrepo et al. [42]. Alcohol is the most consumed legal drug in Mexico, and its negative effects have been repeatedly associated with depression, a disease that affects 300 million people worldwide [43]. Pedrelli [23] points out that adolescents who drink alcoholic beverages to excess show a strong association with the presence of depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder. In relation to drug use, Sanchez-Hervas [44] reports a study in which addicted adolescents showed major depression and, in some of them, depressive symptoms prior to drug use.
Adolescence is a critical period in the developmental history of individuals in which they experience biological, behavioral, and social changes that will allow them to reaffirm their personality, self-esteem, and self-awareness and achieve their identity [45]. Authors such as Genise [27], Hatzenbuehler et al. [28], and Marshal et al. [29] point out that adolescents with different sexual orientations than heterosexual are twice as likely to suffer depression, emotional anxiety, and dysregulation. The family bond during this stage is a determinant for healthy growth, and poor family communication can negatively influence the inadequate venting of negative emotions and, therefore, this generates depression [46,47].
According to Caldera-Zamora [48], women demonstrate a higher inclination towards experiencing mental health issues, specifically an increased vulnerability to mood disorders like depression and anxiety [40].
Anxiety is a common trait in patients with eating disorders [49], as noted by Toro and Vilardel [50], who identified anxiety as a product of excessive preoccupation with the body or physical figure. The results of the present study report that anxiety obtained a B = 0.60, proving its relationship with depression. Antecedent studies have found anxiety symptomatology as a risk predictor for the development of eating disorders and depression, likewise, in clinical populations, comorbidity with generalized anxiety disorder is one of the most common [51,52,53,54,55].
As could be observed, the presence of REB was statistically significant in the logistic regression analysis, demonstrating that for every depressed adolescent there is a probability of presenting two times more REB, as reported by Nuño et al. [56], Unikel et al. [25], and De la Vega et al. [57], who point out that adolescents, regardless of their chronological age but who do present depression, have a tendency towards REB. Unikel et al. [25] found a strong association between the variable’s depression, REB, and anxiety.
Emotional dysregulation showed in the logistic regression analysis that people with depression are three times more likely to have poor emotional regulation. Gratz and Roemer [58] point out that an individual’s awareness of his or her emotional state is key to their regulation. During adolescence, it is difficult to find and label emotions, particularly when their valence is negative. Poor emotional regulation can lead to various consequences, including poor impulse control, generating higher levels of anxiety and depression, as well as substance use and abuse. These behaviors are strongly associated with eating disorders [59,60,61].
Preventing depression in teenagers is crucial because of its significant effects on their emotional well-being, academic performance, and interpersonal relationships. Various strategies to help prevent depression in adolescents should be considered: encourage open communication through the provision of a safe and nonjudgmental space where teens can freely express their feelings and concerns. Similarly, coping skills should be taught to help teens develop problem-solving skills and positive thinking and to effectively manage stress and life challenges. Lifestyle changes involving healthy eating, physical exercise, as well as quality sleep, will allow adolescents to develop strategies that allow them to deal with adversity in a more functional/adaptive way [62,63].

5. Conclusions

The research findings revealed that almost 80% of adolescents were at significant risk of experiencing depression. The analyses of regression highlighted an association between alcohol and drug consumption, indicating a predictive factor for depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder. Furthermore, the study concluded that adolescence, being a developmental stage, plays a crucial role in providing a conducive environment for the manifestation of these symptoms. The study also emphasized that the changes experienced during this phase can result in poor emotional management, leading to crises and severe depression.
Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that the lack of empathy and support for diverse sexual orientations can elevate the prevalence of depression, particularly when accompanied by familial violence. Hence, it is imperative to consider these factors when evaluating and addressing the mental health of adolescents.

6. Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Supplying information that writes down the existence of a high percentage at risk of depression in the adolescent population has a valuable preventive value. However, inclusive management of the environment that favors the origin and maintenance of depression is not foreseen. It is of foremost importance not to forget the great challenge that the stage they are going through imposes on them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization G.G.-P. and R.S.P.-A.; method, G.G.-P.; formal analysis, R.S.P.-A.; investigation, G.G.-P. and R.S.P.-A.; data collection, R.S.P.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G.-P.; writing—review and editing, R.S.P.-A. and G.G.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by DGAPA PAPIIT IN310620.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Faculty of Psychology (FPCE_08032021_H_AC 27 April 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The information provided in this research can be obtained upon request from the author in charge. Due to ethical considerations, the data is not accessible to the public.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the selfless collaboration of students and teachers from the different campuses where the data were obtained.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Depresión. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression (accessed on 31 March 2023).
  2. Marcheco Teruel, B. El rol de los genes en la depresión: Una mirada al presente y futuro en el campo de las investigaciones genéticas. Rev. Cuban. Genét. Comun. 2015, 9, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Retamal, C.P. Depresión; Editorial Universitaria: Santiago, Chile, 1999; pp. 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vásquez Machado, A. Depresión. Diferencias de género. Multimed 2013, 17, 193–217. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lazarevick, I.; Mora-Carrasco, F. Depresión y género: Factores psicosociales de riesgo. Segunda Época 2008, 4, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vásquez Machado, A. Relación entre violencia y depresión en mujeres. Rev. Chil. Neuro-Psiquiat 2007, 70, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rodriguez Espínola, S. Relación entre nivel socioeconómico, apoyo social percibido, género y depresión en niños. Interdisciplinaria 2010, 27, 261–275. [Google Scholar]
  8. Summerland, A.; Marston, L.; Huntley, J.; Livingston, G.; Lewis, G.; Steptoe, A.; Fancourt, D. Relaciones sociales y depresión durante el confinamiento por la COVID-19: Análisis longitudinal del estudio social de la COVID-19. Med. Psic. 2022, 32, 3381–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferrel Ortega, R.F.; Celis Barros, A.; Hernández Cantero, O. Depresión y factores socio demográficos asociados en estudiantes universitarios de ciencias de la salud de una universidad pública (Colombia). Psicol. Desde El Caribe 2011, 27, 40–60. [Google Scholar]
  10. Álvarez, Z.M.; Ramírez Jacobo, B.; Silva Rodríguez, A.; Coffin Cabrera, N.; Jiménez Rentería, M.L. La relación entre depresión y conflictos familiares en adolescentes. Rev. Int. Psicol. Ter. Psicol. 2009, 9, 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gonzales Lugo, S.; Pineda Domínguez, A.; Gaxiola Romero, J.C. Depresión adolescente: Factores de riesgo y apoyo social como factor protector. Univ. Psychol. 2018, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zysberg, L.; Rubanov, A. Inteligencia emocional y patrones de alimentación emocional: ¿una nueva perspectiva sobre los antecedentes de los trastornos alimentarios? J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2010, 42, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mills, P.; Newman, E.F.; Cossar, J.; Murray, G. Emotional Maltreatment and Disordered Eating in Adolescents: Testing the Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation. Child Abus. Negl. 2015, 39, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Silk, J.S.; Shaw, D.S.; Skuban, E.M.; Oland, A.A.; Kovacs, M. Estrategias de regulación de emociones en hijos de madres con depresión infantil. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2006, 47, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Garber, J.; Braafladt, N.; Zeman, J. The regulation of sad affect: An information processing perspective. In The Development of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation; Garber, J., Dodge, K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 208–240. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bariola, E.; Hughes, E.K.; Gullone, E. Relaciones entre padres e hijos Uso de estrategias de regulación emocional: Un informe breve. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2012, 21, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cassano, M.; Perry-Parrish, C.; Zeman, J. Influencia del género en la socialización de los padres de la regulación de la tristeza de los niños. Des. Soc. 2007, 16, 210–231. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansson, E.; Daukantaité, D.; Johnsson, P. Disordered eating and emotion dysregulation among adolescents and their parents. BMC Psychol. 2017, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Campos, M.S.; Martínez-Larrea, J.A. Trastornos afectivos: Análisis de su comorbilidad en los trastornos psiquiátricos más frecuentes. An. Sist. Sanit. 2002, 25, 117–136. [Google Scholar]
  20. Boden, J.M.; Foulds, J.A. Major depression and alcohol use disorder in adolescence: Does comorbidity lead to poorer outcomes of depression? J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 206, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boden, J.; Fergusson, D.M.M. Alcohol and depression. Addiction 2011, 106, 906–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fergusson, D.M.; Horwood, L.J.; Lynskey, M.T. Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: II. Psychiatric outcomes of childhood sexual abuse. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 1996, 35, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pedrelli, P.; Shapero, B.; Archibald, A.; Dale, C. Alcohol use and depression during adolescence and young adulthood: A summary and interpretation of mixed findings. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2016, 1, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. González Sánchez, J.D.; García Aurrecoechea, V.R.; y Córdova Alcaráz, A. Uso de sustancias entre adolescentes y su asociación con síntomas de depresión y percepción de sus relaciones familiares. Dir. Investig. Y Enseñanza Subdirección Investig. 2004, 3, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  25. Unikel Santoncini, C.; Díaz de León-Vázquez, C.; González-Forteza, C.; Wagner Echeagaray, F.; Rivera Márquez, J.A. Conducta alimentaria de riesgo, síntomas depresivos y correlatos psicosociales en estudiantes universitarios de primer ingreso. Acta Univ. 2015, 25, 35–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. American Psychological Association (APA). Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. Available online: https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq (accessed on 5 February 2023).
  27. Genise, G.; Humeniuk, A.R.; Ungaretti, J.; Etchezahar, E.D.; de Giuli, S. Relación entre la orientación sexual y personalidad en una muestra de adolescentes argentinos. Rev. Psicol. Clín. Niñ. Adolesc. 2019, 6, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hatzenbuehler, M.L.; Keyes, K.M.; McLaughlin, K.A.; Hasin, D.S. The Impact of Institutional Discrimination on Psychiatric Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: A Prospective Study. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marshal, M.P.; Dietz, L.J.; Friedman, M.S.; Stall, R.; Smith, H.A.; McGinley, J.; Thoma, B.C.; Murray, P.J.; D’Augelli, A.R.; Brent, D.A. Suicidality and depression disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth: A meta-analytic review. J. Adolesc. Health 2011, 49, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Bjureberg, J.; Sahlin, H.; Hedman-Lagerlöf, E.; Gratz, K.L.; Tull, M.T.; Jokinen, J.; Hellner, C.; Ljótsson, B. Extending research on Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) with nonsuicidal self-injury disorder: Open pilot trial and mediation analysis of a novel online version. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Klonsky, E.D. The function of self-injury in young adults who cut themselves: Clarifying the evidence for affect-regulation. Psychiatry Res. 2009, 166, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bruce, M.L.; Ten Have, T.R.; Reynolds, C.F.; Katz, I.I.; Schulberg, H.C.; Mulsant, B.H.; Brown, G.K.; McAvay, G.J.; Pearson, J.L.; Alexopoulos, G.S. Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 291, 1081–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alansari, B.M. Relationship between depression and anxiety among undergraduates students in eighteen arab countries: A cross-cultural study. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2005, 33, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gómez-Peresmitré, G.; Platas-Acevedo, R.S.; León-Hernández, R.; Pineda-García, G.; Guzmán-Saldaña, R. Psychometric Assessment of an Online Self-Test Measuring Risky Eating Behavior, Depression, Social Anxiety, and Self-Injury in Mexican Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Potthat, M. Confirmatory factor analysis of ordered categorical variables with large models. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 1993, 46, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ortega, M.; María, R.; Pendás, T.; Leonel, C.; Ortega, M.; Mercedes; Abreu, P.; María, A.Y.C.A. El coeficiente de correlación de los rangos de Spearman caracterización. Rev. Hab. Cien. Med. 2009, 8, 2. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoyle, R. Manual de Modelado de Ecuaciones Estructurales, 2nd ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ibrahim, A.; Kelly, S.J. A Systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. J. Psychiatr Rev. 2012, 47, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Trastornos Mentales. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  41. Contreras Olive, Y.; Miranda Gómez, O.; Torres Lio-Coo, V. Ansiedad y depresión en pacientes adictos a sustancias psicoactivas. Rev. Cub. Med. Mil. 2020, 49, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  42. Restrepo, J.E.; Amador Sánchez, O.; Calderon Vallejo, C.; Castañeda Quirama, T.; Diez Cardona, P. Depresión y su relación con el consumo de sustancias psicoactivas, el estrés académico y la ideación suicida en estudiantes universitarios colombianos. Health Adict. 2018, 18, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Consejo Nacional Para el Desarrollo y la Inclusión de las Personas con Discapacidad. Día Mundial de la Lucha Contra la Depresión. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/conadis/articulos/13-de-enero-dia-mundial-de-la-lucha-contra-la-depresion#:~:text=El%2013%20de%20enero%20se,mayores%20los%20grupos%20m%C3%A1s%20afectados (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  44. Sánchez Hervás, E. Depresión, ansiedad y consumo de drogas. Anál. Modif. Conducta. 1995, 21, 735–743. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bjorklund, D.F.; Hernández Blasi, C. Child and Development an Integrated Approach, 1st ed.; Cengage Learn: Boston, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  46. Escobar Palomeque, A.M.; Peñaloza Brito, M.P. Relación del Ambiente Familiar, Consumo de Sustancias y Calidad de Vida, con Ansiedad y Depresión, en Adolescentes de 12 a 17 Años, que Asisten a Centros de Acogida y Adicciones, en Quito Cotacachi, Pusuqui, y Guayaquil, Periodo Noviembre 2017 a Julio 2018. Tesis de Licenciatura en Pediatría; Pontificia Universidad Católica Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruíz Cárdenas, C.T.; Jiménez Flores, J.; García Méndez, M.; Flores Herrera, L.M.; Trejo Márquez, H.D. Factores del ambiente familiar predictores de depresión en adolescentes escolares: Análisis por sexo. Rev. Digit. Int. Psicol. Y Cienc. Soc. 2020, 6, 104–122. [Google Scholar]
  48. Caldera Zamora, I.A.; del Campo Rayas, P.M.; Caldera Montes, J.F.; Reynoso Gonzales, O.U.; Zamora Betancourt, M.R. Predictores de conductas alimentarias de riesgo en estudiantes de bachillerato. RevMexTrastalim 2019, 10, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  49. Matera Bryteck, A. Mood and emotional symptoms in eating disorder patients. Arch. Psychiatry Psychother. 2008, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  50. Toro, J.; Vilardel, E. Anorexia Nerviosa, 1st ed.; Martinez Roca, S.A.: Barcelona, España, 2000; pp. 88–91. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gander, M.; Sevecke, K.; Buchheim, A. Eating disorders in adolescence: Attachment issues from a developmental perspective. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Holm-Denoma, J.M.; Hankin, B.L.; Young, J.F. Developmental trends of eating disorder symptoms and comorbid internalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Eat. Behav. 2014, 15, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Schaumberg, K.; Zerwas, S.; Goodman, E.; Yilmaz, Z.; Bulik, C.M.; Micali, N. Anxiety disorders symptoms at age 10 predict eating disorder symptoms and diagnoses in adolescence. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 2018, 60, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Morgan-Lowes, K.L.; Clarke, P.J.F.; Hoiles, K.J.; Shu, C.Y.; Watson, H.J.; Dunlop, P.D.; Egan, S.J. The relationships between perfectionism, anxiety and depression across time in pediatric eating disorders. Eat. Behav. 2019, 34, 101305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gómez-Peresmitré, G.; Pineda-García, G.; Platas Acevedo, S.; Velasco Ariza, V. Ansiedad como predictor del riesgo de anorexia y bulimia: Comparación entre universitarios de Baja California y Ciudad de México. Rev. Mex Tras. Aliment. 2017, 8, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nuño Gutiérrez, B.L.; Celis de la Rosa, A.; Unikel Santoncini, C. Prevalencia y factores asociados a las conductas alimentarias de riesgo en adolescentes escolares de Guadalajara según sexo. Rev. Investig. Clin. 2009, 6, 286–293. [Google Scholar]
  57. de la Vega, M.I.; Gómez -Peresmitré, G. Intervención cognitivo-conductual en conductas alimentarias de riesgo. Rev. Psicol. y Sal. 2012, 22, 225–234. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gratz, K.L.; Roemer, L. Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess 2004, 26, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Campbell-Sills, L.; Barlow, D.H. Incorporating Emotion Regulation into Conceptualizations and Treatments of Anxiety and Mood Disorders. In Handbook of Emotion Regulation; Gross, J.J., Ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 542–559. [Google Scholar]
  60. Inzlicht, M.; Bartholow, B.D.; Hirsh, J.B. Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2015, 19, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Medina Pradas, C.; Navarro, J.B.; López, S.R.; Grau, A.; Obiols, J.E. Dyadic view of expressed emotion, stress, and eating disorder psychopathology. Appetite 2011, 57, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Merry, S.N.; Hetrick, S.E.; Cox, G.R.; Brudevold-Iversen, T.; Bir, J.J.; McDowell, H. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 7, CD003380. [Google Scholar]
  63. Schuch, F.B.; Vancampfort, D.; Firth, J.; Rosenbaum, S.; Ward, P.B.; Reichert, T.; Stubbs, B. Physical activity and incident depression: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 2018, 175, 631–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Children 10 01264 g001 550
Figure 1. Depression structural model.
Figure 1. Depression structural model.
Children 10 01264 g001
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic data.
Table 1. Sociodemographic data.
Male
(n = 181)		Female
(n = 376)
Living with
Nuclear family135 (74.6%)294 (79.1%)
Single parent (Mother or father)45 (24.9%)80 (21.3%)
Siblings1 (0.6%)1 (0.3%)
Partner-1 (0.3%)
Father’s occupation
No parent36 (19.9%)41 (10.9%)
Informal economic activity23 (12.7%)62 (16.5%)
Formal economic activity121 (66.9%)253 (67.3%)
Unknown1 (0.6%)8 (2.1%)
Unemployed-12 (3.2%)
Father’s education
No parent36 (19.9%)41 (10.9%)
Basic education38 (21%)108 (28.7%)
Middle education59 (32.6%)119 (31.6%)
Higher education48 (26.5%)106 (28.2%)
No education-2 (0.5%)
Mother’s occupation
No parent8 (4.4%)5 (1.3%)
Informal economic activity24 (13.3%)47 (12.5%)
Formal economic activity83 (45.9%)182 (48.4%)
Unpaid job66 (36.5%)142 (37.8%)
Sexual orientation
Heterosexual136 (75.1%)248 (66%)
Bisexual17 (9.4%)99 (26.3%)
Homosexual16 (8.8%)7 (1.9%)
Other12 (6.6%)22 (5.9%)
Domestic violence
Yes28 (15.5%)123 (32.7%)
No153 (84.5%)253 (67.3%)
Use of alcohol and drugs school
Consumption67 (37%)177 (47.1%)
Nonconsumption114 (63%)199 (52.9%)
Use of alcohol and drugs house
Consumption44 (24.3%)143 (38%)
Nonconsumption137 (75.7%)233 (62%)
Table
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation for the variables REB, anxiety, dysregulation, sexual orientation, family violence, and alcohol and drug use with depression.
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation for the variables REB, anxiety, dysregulation, sexual orientation, family violence, and alcohol and drug use with depression.
Variables Pearson Correlation
REB0.40 **
Anxiety0.60 **
Emotional dysregulation0.47 **
Sexual orientation0.33 **
Violence in the family−0.26 **
Drugs and alcohol at school−0.20 **
Drugs and alcohol at home−0.28 **
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
Table
Table 3. Lineal regression.
Table 3. Lineal regression.
ModelRR SquareR Square AdjustedStandard Error of the EstimateStatistics of Changes
Change of Square of RChange of Fdf1df2Next Change in F
10.725a0.5250.5186.2560.52574.72085410.000
Table
Table 4. Logistic regression.
Table 4. Logistic regression.
BStandard
Error		WaldglSig.Exp (B)95% CI EXP (B)
LowerUpper
REB0.6950.2527.59610.0062.0031.2223.282
Anxiety1.1760.26519.63110.0003.2401.9265.451
Emotional dysregulation1.0660.25916.99610.0002.9031.7494.819
Sexual orientation1.2970.35813.09210.0003.6571.8127.383
Family violence−0.8100.3415.65110.0170.4450.2280.867
Alcohol and drugs at school−0.7280.2677.44510.0060.4830.2860.815
Alcohol and drugs at home−1.1890.35511.24210.0010.3040.1520.610
Constant−0.3281.2110.07410.7860.720
B = beta; Exp (B) = standardized beta; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; p = statistical confidence.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Peresmitré, G.; Platas-Acevedo, R.S. Depression Disorders in Mexican Adolescents: A Predictive Model. Children 2023, 10, 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071264

AMA Style

Gómez-Peresmitré G, Platas-Acevedo RS. Depression Disorders in Mexican Adolescents: A Predictive Model. Children. 2023; 10(7):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Peresmitré, Gilda, and Romana Silvia Platas-Acevedo. 2023. "Depression Disorders in Mexican Adolescents: A Predictive Model" Children 10, no. 7: 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop