Next Article in Journal
Residual Cough and Asthma-like Symptoms Post-COVID-19 in Children
Next Article in Special Issue
School-Age Outcomes of Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate in Preterm Infants
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the Severity of Osteogenesis Imperfecta on Cranial Measurements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced Hippocampal Volumes in Children with History of Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy after Therapeutic Hypothermia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/children10061030
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone versus Buprenorphine

by
Alla Kushnir
1,
Ravi Bhavsar
1,
Emad Hanna
2 and
Thomas Hegyi
2,*
1
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatric, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA
2
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(6), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061030
Submission received: 27 April 2023 / Revised: 31 May 2023 / Accepted: 4 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evidence for Long-Term Developmental Deficits in the High Risk Human Neonate)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has been of increasing concern. Studies suggest that prenatal exposure to buprenorphine may be preferred to methadone in regard to neonatal withdrawal. Our aim was to determine whether the incidence and severity of NAS are different between babies prenatally exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in pregnancy. This retrospective analysis of infants ≥ 35-weeks-old exposed to methadone/buprenorphine alone or in conjunction with other substances in utero. They were divided into four groups: 1—methadone alone (Met), 2—buprenorphine alone (Bup), 3 and 4—those exposed to methadone and buprenorphine, respectively, in conjunction with other drugs (Met+ and Bup+). The frequency of NAS treatment, duration of treatment (LOT) and length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups. Of the 290 mothers, 59% were in the Met group, 18% in the Bup group, 14% in the Met or Bup and another opiate group, and 9% took methadone or buprenorphine plus various other substances. Infants born to Met/Met+ mothers had a four-times higher likelihood of developing NAS (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the LOS (p = 0.08) or LOT (p = 0.11) between groups. The buprenorphine treatment in pregnancy decreased the risk of babies developing NAS. However, once the NAS required pharmacological treatment, the type of maternal prenatal exposure did not affect the LOS or LOT.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) has increased substantially over the last two decades [1,2]. The rate of NOWS increased nationally from 4.0 to 7.3 per 1000 birth hospitalizations from 2010 to 2017, accompanied by an increase in the rate of opioid-related conditions (e.g., OUD) in mothers at the time of delivery [3]. During the period 1999–2014, the national prevalence of opioid use disorder increased 333%, from 1.5 to 6.5 cases per 1000 delivery hospitalizations [4]. Opioid use in expectant women had close to a five-fold increase from 2000 to 2009 [4,5]. There are a number of perinatal and postnatal factors potentially associated with maternal OUD, such as underuse of preventive care, which may contribute to various adverse infant outcomes [6]. Over the last two decades, the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in the U.S. has sharply increased from 1.19 per 1000 hospital births in 2000 to 5.63 in 2012, and there was a five-fold increase in cases from 2004 to 2014 [7]. During the same period, the number of infants treated for NAS in neonatal intensive care units in the U.S. increased five-fold [5,8]. The rise in NAS incidence was primarily due to the increased opioid dependence seen in pregnancy in recent years. By 2009, one NAS infant was born per hour, with an estimated $720 million in hospital charges [5].
Symptoms of NAS occur as a result of the sudden cessation of drugs that the fetus was exposed to in utero [9]. NAS typically presents 48–72 h post-birth and manifests as nervous system irritability, autonomic system dysfunction and gastrointestinal and respiratory abnormalities. Withdrawal signs may begin within 24 h of birth in infants exposed to drugs with a shorter half-life (such as heroin), while withdrawal from methadone and buprenorphine (longer half-life) usually begins between 24 h and 5 days after birth, but can begin as late as at 14 days of age.
Prenatal exposure to opioids is usually associated with multiple risk factors contributing to unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes, including a decrease in birth weight and head circumference associated with heroin use during pregnancy [10]. Opioid dependence is not only related to poor medical sequelae, but is also responsible for a substantial and growing portion of resources dedicated to neonates in NICUs and hospitals nationwide [7,8,11,12].
In 1964, methadone, a mu-opioid agonist, was introduced as a replacement treatment for opioid addiction. The use of methadone in subjects who were not pregnant with opioid dependence improved patient outcomes, and its use as part of pharmacotherapy in pregnant women is believed to improve maternal and neonatal prognosis, compared to subjects receiving no treatment at all [13,14,15]. These improvements included higher birth weights, longer gestational ages, and fewer complications compared to infants whose mothers used opioids during pregnancy [10]. In addition, methadone use in the latter part of pregnancy has been shown to affect fetal neurobehavioral outcomes, with split dosing lowering but not improving the effects when compared to single dosing [16,17]. Initially, methadone use during pregnancy was considered unrelated to withdrawal in neonates; however, subsequent experience contradicted this initial assumption. It has now been well-established that exposure to methadone in utero may result in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) [3,13,14,18,19,20,21].
Buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid agonist and kappa-opioid antagonist that has been used to treat opioid dependence in both Europe (1996) and the United States (2002) [22]. Its low intrinsic receptor efficacy due to the partial agonist activity causes its less-than-maximal opioid effect and a reduced risk of overdose compared to methadone [23,24]. The use of buprenorphine during pregnancy is also associated with NOWS. Some studies suggest that it may result in milder manifestations than those seen with methadone [18,25,26,27].
Both buprenorphine and methadone had similar retention in the treatment and suppression of illicit opioid use effects when given at medium or high doses [24]. There were differences seen in neonatal outcomes in the studies comparing the use of methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependency in pregnancy [7,28,29,30]. Prenatal exposure to buprenorphine may be superior to methadone in terms of the infant’s gestational age at birth, birth weight, total morphine dose needed for treatment of symptoms of NAS, duration of NAS treatment and neonatal hospital length of stay [31,32,33,34].
There are emerging data on the differences in the severity of NAS based on the in-utero exposure to methadone vs. buprenorphine [18,22,31,35,36,37,38,39]. The treatment of pregnant women with both of these drugs may lead to neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in the neonate. The severity of having withdrawal and developing NAS based on the type of opioid exposure remains unclear.
If there is a concern for, or evidence of, opioid exposure then in utero patients are monitored after birth, and, if signs of withdrawal are noted, a scoring system is used to document the signs and symptoms. A number of scoring systems are available, with the Finnegan Scoring System (FSS) being the most comprehensive one, and the one frequently used to assess NOWS/NAS. The FSS or Modified Finnegan Scoring System (MFSS) is designed to quantify the extent of the withdrawal symptoms in term newborns [40,41,42]. FSS quantifies the signs and symptoms observed in NOWS/NAS. FSS has been validated and is used to monitor the signs of withdrawal as a guide for initiating, adjusting, monitoring and terminating the pharmacological treatment of NAS in newborn infants [43]. The individual symptoms are weighted depending on the symptom. Based on the findings of Zimmermann-Baer et al., scores of 8 or more represent worse withdrawal symptoms and may indicate that pharmacological therapy needs to be used as a treatment of NOWS/NAS [44]. The FSS has been recognized as a reliable scoring tool [45,46,47]. Over the last 5–10 years, the Eat Sleep Console (ESC) has gained much wider acceptance [48,49,50] and is one of the various other scoring systems for NOWS that have been used. Other scoring systems include the Lipsitz Neonatal Drug-Withdrawal Scoring System [51], the Neonatal Withdrawal Inventory [47] and the Neonatal Narcotic Withdrawal Index [43].
The head circumference is one of the predictors of brain volume in children. [28] Prior studies have observed a significant reduction in head growth in utero in chronically opioid-exposed fetuses, resulting in a smaller head circumference at birth [52,53].
We conducted a study to determine whether the incidence of withdrawal from opioids in utero and the severity of NAS are different between babies prenatally exposed to methadone versus buprenorphine, and whether the difference of exposure affects the head circumference.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Methods

This was a retrospective review of charts of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or transitional nursery in an inner city, tertiary level hospital in New Jersey from 2010 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were infants of ≥35 weeks gestational age (GA) whose mothers used prescribed or illicit substances, were on methadone or buprenorphine while pregnant, or had a positive urine drug screen at any point during the current pregnancy. Substances that were disclosed by the mother, or that were documented during maternal or neonatal toxicology screening were recorded.
Pregnant women were divided into 4 groups: 1—treated with methadone alone (Met); 2—treated with buprenorphine alone (Bup); 3—received methadone while still using other drugs (other opiates such as heroin, oxycodone, etc. or any other type of drug) (Met+); and 4—those who received buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs (other opiates such as heroin, oxycodone, etc. or any other type of drug) (Bup+). Neonates born to mothers who used other opiates alone, or were polysubstance users in combination with other opiates but were not receiving methadone or buprenorphine, were excluded. Neonates who had severe respiratory distress requiring support or had other neurological conditions that made diagnosis of NAS or evaluation with MFSS difficult were excluded. Frequency of documentation of NAS, duration of medical (opiate) treatment for NAS (length of treatment-LOT), and length of stay (LOS) were compared between the 4 groups. NAS was defined as requiring pharmacological treatment for symptoms of withdrawal from opiates based on 3 consecutive Finnegan scores of 8 or greater.
All charts of pregnant women with documented ICD10 code for drug use, abuse, drug exposure, methadone, or buprenorphine treatment (F13–19.10–23, O99.320–324, O35.5XX0, F11.10, F11.20, F11.90, F19.929) were evaluated. The proportion of neonates who required close observation for withdrawal/NAS were documented. Any infants born to mothers identified using the above criteria and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and/or transitional/intermediate (Trans) unit who had been started on medication to control withdrawal symptoms of NAS were identified from a neonatal database (Neonatal Information System) or electronic medical record (EPIC). All information was documented on a data extraction form. Two members of the team performed all the data collection, and the data were verified by 2 other members of the team, and checked for accuracy. Descriptive data regarding delivery, maternal and neonatal demographics, neonatal outcomes and need for treatment were collected.
Head circumference of the neonates at birth and at discharge was compared between the groups. Head circumference was recorded by the nurse in centimeters on admission and on the day of discharge. Rate of change from admission to discharge was calculated to evaluate head growth. The need for medication treatment for NAS, when it was initiated, what medication was used, and the maximum dosage of that medication were documented and compared between groups. We also recorded LOT and LOS, as well as other short-term neonatal outcomes.
The number of infants diagnosed with NAS who had been started on medication to control withdrawal symptoms was identified as described above. Proportion of mothers treated with methadone versus buprenorphine (±other substances) who had neonates that required treatment was compared between the 4 groups. The severity and duration of NAS symptoms were evaluated by examining the maximum dosage of medication needed and duration of treatment. Head circumference and the percentile of head circumference at birth and at discharge were compared between groups as one of the short-term neonatal outcomes. Secondary factors were also compared between groups. Some comparisons were performed for the 2 groups exposed to buprenorphine vs. methadone, to have a more robust statistical analysis. Statistics were performed using Minitab (Minitab version 17.0, State College, PA, USA). Comparisons between the groups were made using Student’s t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous data, and chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data. The difference was considered significant at p < 0.05.

2.2. NAS Treatment

During a part of the period of data collection there was no standardized protocol in place for the treatment of NAS at our institution. Mothers were encouraged to breastfeed in the absence of illicit substances noted in maternal urine drug screen prior to delivery, as part of the non-pharmacological treatment. All neonates received standard non-pharmacological treatment (such as swaddling, rocking, low-stimulation environment, etc.) while being evaluated for signs of withdrawal and NAS. The general practice for most practitioners was to initiate medication when there were 3 consecutive Finnegan scores of 8 or greater. Finnegan scoring was performed every 3–4 h after feeds (interval depended on the frequency of eating for each baby), and this changed to every 2 h in those who had a Finnegan score greater than 8. Scoring would return to every 3–4 h once 3 consecutive scores below 8 were documented. After the protocol was initiated in 2013, it followed the description noted above.
Morphine would be given orally (PO) when possible; however, in neonates with NAS who were unable to take morphine PO it was given NG/OG. Medical treatment in the form of an opioid (tincture of opium early in the study and morphine sulfate for patients treated after 2013) was started at approximately 0.02–0.04 mg/kg/dose every 3–4 h and increased as needed. Once the protocol was initiated, starting dose was 0.04 mg/kg/dose every 4 h of morphine sulfate. Total opioid dosing was calculated due to multiple types of opioid medication being prescribed during the time of the study.
In the presence of 3 consecutive Finnegan scores greater than 8 or 2 successive scores greater than 13, morphine was increased by 25% of the current dose. When all scores were less than 8 for 24–48 h, morphine was weaned by 10% of the highest amount. Opiate treatment was stopped when the dose was below 0.02 mg/kg/dose every 3 h (or 0.027 mg/kg/dose every 4 h).
In cases where withdrawal symptoms were not well controlled and opioid therapy dose was increased four times or more, phenobarbital was considered and/or initiated as a second-line therapy. Phenobarbital was initiated with a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 12 h orally. Loading dose was not used when starting phenobarbital; the dose of phenobarbital was typically maintained throughout the stay and for discharge. In patients with more significant withdrawal that was challenging to treat, phenobarbital dose would be weight-adjusted throughout the stay.
Clonidine was not routinely used as a primary or secondary treatment of NAS during the time period examined in this study. Although methadone was already being used by some hospitals to treat NAS, it was not one of the possible medications used to treat NAS at our facility.

3. Results

Out of 290 mothers evaluated, 171 (59%) were treated with methadone alone or took methadone with other substances, 49 (17%) were treated with buprenorphine or took buprenorphine with other substances, 44 (15%) took other opioids in addition to methadone or buprenorphine, and 26 (9%) were polysubstance users in addition to methadone or buprenorphine. Of the 171 mothers who received methadone, 96 (56%) took methadone alone (Met). Of the 49 treated with buprenorphine, 44 (90%) took it alone (Bup). All results were verified with a maternal urine drug screen. Out of the 290 babies exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in utero, 207 (71%) developed an NAS that required pharmacological treatment.
See Table 1 for a description of neonates treated for NAS based on the Met, Met+, Bup, and Bup+ groups. In the Met/Met+ group, 81% of neonates required treatment, while in the Bup/Bup+ group, 50% of neonates developed an NAS that required treatment (p < 0.001).
Infants born to Met/Met+ mothers had a four-fold higher incidence of NAS (p < 0.001) compared to Bup/Bup+. The clinical course of the infants is shown in Table 2. The length of stay (LOS) of babies treated for NAS in the Bup group of mothers was 7 days shorter compared to the Met group (p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the day of life when opiate treatment was started, initial wean was initiated or mean and maximum Finnegan score obtained prior to initiation of treatment (Table 2). The maximum opiate dose per day used for Met/Met+ babies was significantly larger than for the Bup/Bup+ babies. The maximal opiate dose used to treat NAS correlated with the LOS (r = 0.26, p < 0.03) and LOT (r = 0.23). Out of the infants treated for NAS, the duration of treatment was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.11).
There were significant differences in birth weight between groups (Met 2918 g ± 635, Met+ 2857 g ± 457, Bup 3417 g ± 479 and Bup+ 3099 g ± 449 respectively, p <0.001), with neonates in the Bup/Bup+ being significantly heavier than the Met/Met+ ones. There was a significant difference in the type of feeds used (p = 0.03). Most neonates received formula, with a minority receiving a combination of formula and breast milk. Only one received breast milk (Table 1) exclusively. There was a significant difference in the rate of exposure to tobacco in utero between the groups, with Met and Met+ having a significantly higher proportion exposed (p = 0.04) (Table 1).
There was no difference between admission head circumference in cm or percentile between groups (p = 0.51 and 0.33 respectively). While the head circumference at discharge in cm was not different between groups, there was a significant difference in percentile head circumference at discharge. There were no differences in the rate of head circumference growth (Table 3).
The mean duration of length of stay (LOS) for all neonates exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in utero, regardless of requiring pharmacological treatment for NAS, was as follows: Met (methadone exposure alone), 35.8 days (95% CI 32.7–38.8); Bup (buprenorphine exposure alone), 23.6 days (95% CI 18.1–29); Met+ (those who took methadone in conjunction with other drugs or opiates), 24 days (95% CI 17.8–30.2); and Bup+ (took buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs), 8.7 days (95% CI 0.3–17) (See Figure 1). The Met group had a significantly longer LOS compared to the Met+, Bup and Bup+ groups. Those exposed to methadone alone had a significantly longer LOS than those exposed to buprenorphine alone or in combination, or those in the Met+ group (p < 0.001) (Figure 1).
There was not difference in the mean duration of opiate treatment days (with confidence intervals using SD) for neonates who underwent NAS treatment for all neonates exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in utero as seen in Figure 2. The LOT was as follows: Met (methadone exposure alone), 30.9 days (95% CI 27.2–34.6); Bup (buprenorphine exposure alone), 23.6 days (95% CI 17.2–29.9); Met+ (those who took methadone in conjunction with other drugs, opiates or other), 28.2 days (95% CI 23.3–33.4); and Bup+ (took buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs), 29.3 days (95% CI 25.3–33.4). p = 0.11 (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

NAS has exhibited a dramatic rise in maternal opioid use disorders in the U.S., with cases more than quadrupling from 1999 to 2014 [51]. This prenatal opioid epidemic is partially due to prescribed opioid medications for pain management or opioid use disorder treatment [54], with the most commonly prescribed opioids being hydrocodone (6.8%), codeine (6.1%) and oxycodone (2.0%) [55]. Opioid dependence is not only associated with a poor medical sequelae, but is also responsible for a substantial and growing portion of resources dedicated to critically ill neonates in NICUs nationwide [7].
Prenatal exposure to opioids is usually associated with unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes [56]. In our study, we found that neonates exposed to buprenorphine had a shorter LOT. Similar to our study, prior studies have suggested that buprenorphine-exposed infants have a lower incidence of NAS that requires pharmacological treatment than those exposed to methadone in utero [36]. However, unlike the results found by Kakko, we found that symptoms of withdrawal and severity of withdrawal, as well as the duration of treatment, were similar between groups.
NAS typically presents 2–3 days post-birth [22,57,58] and manifests with tremors, irritability, excessive crying, difficulty sleeping, diarrhea and occasionally seizures [58,59]. Although the effect of exposure to these medications on the neuronal and psychological profile of developing fetuses is unknown, there is a concern that NAS is associated with adverse neurocognitive, behavioral and developmental outcomes [17]. Although parental education may decrease the risk of poor outcomes [17,60], Miller et al. showed that children with a history of NAS had significantly higher rates of language delays at ten years than children without [61].
The clinical characteristics of NAS differ with drug exposure. In methadone-exposed infants, the onset and severity of NAS may vary. Methadone-treated infants may have an earlier start of NAS, even within 24 h of birth, while buprenorphine-exposed infants have shown a delayed onset, sometimes of up to 7 days [62,63].
Initially, infants with NAS are typically managed with non-pharmacological treatment interventions such as breastfeeding, swaddling, rooming-in, environmental control and skin-to-skin contact [64]. In a study by Dryden, breastfed neonates had a shorter length of stay in the hospital than formula-fed neonates or neonates who received formula and breast milk [65]. However, if there is no improvement in symptoms of withdrawal, medications are initiated, with morphine the most commonly used drug for treatment [58]. Successful clinical management is the key to better NAS outcomes [66].
In several investigations, prenatal exposure to methadone compared to buprenorphine resulted in an extended hospitalization, but was often complicated by multiple drug exposure. For example, maternal methadone dose and concomitant in utero exposure to benzodiazepines prolonged the neonatal length of hospital stay [32]. Our results were similar to those of previous authors, where neonates exposed to methadone had a longer length of stay, since they were more likely to require treatment for NAS. However, we did not find significant differences in the duration of treatment of NAS in methadone-exposed versus buprenorphine-exposed infants. The buprenorphine-exposed group required significantly less morphine as seen in other studies [30]. Compared to the length of hospital stay and duration of treatment noted by Metz [34], we found that our population had a more extended hospital stay (35 vs. 25 days) for methadone-exposed infants and (28 vs. 13 days) for buprenorphine-exposed infants. Our length of treatment was approximately 5–6 days shorter than LOS in all groups, bringing the duration of treatment closer to the typical numbers expected. There was no difference in the severity of NAS between the two groups. This was evidenced by the lack of difference in the mean or maximum Finnegan score noted prior to initiation of opioid treatment between groups. This was consistent with following the protocol for all neonates, and initiating medication once the Finnegan scores were higher than 8 three consecutive times, regardless of the day of life of the neonate or neonatal characteristics.
Although there was a significant difference in birth weight between the groups, there was no difference in admission head circumference. Head circumference accurately predicts brain volume in children [28]. Prior studies have observed a significant reduction in head growth in utero for chronically opioid exposed fetuses [50,51]. This impact on brain development is associated with microstructural alteration in major white matter tracts [67]. Buprenorphine-exposed infants presented with similar head circumference, implying a limited protective effect of this partial mu agonist on neuronal compromise, which may occur more frequently with methadone, a full mu agonist [68].
Our findings suggest that neonatal outcomes produced by prenatal exposure to methadone and buprenorphine differ. This difference in the neonatal outcomes may be explained by differences in the placental transfer and the pharmacokinetics of the two medications. Buprenorphine is absorbed more readily from the maternal circulation into placental tissue, but is released less promptly from the placental tissue into the fetal circulation compared to methadone, suggesting that fetal exposure to buprenorphine may be decreased [69].
There was a significant difference in the rate of exposure to tobacco in utero between the groups, with the Met and Met+ groups having a significantly higher proportion exposed. For all groups, it was more common than the incidence seen in pregnant women in the general population in the U.S. (highest prevalence for women aged 20–24 (10.7%), followed by women aged 15–19 (8.5%) and 25–29 (8.2%) [70]. This difference may partially explain the difference in birth weights.
Our retrospective study had several limitations, including uncontrolled confounding variables such as the economic/social status of the pregnant mothers and nutritional status during pregnancy. A further limitation associated with a chart review is the lack of randomization. Due to the pragmatic nature of this study, patients had various in utero exposures, not just to buprenorphine and methadone, but other opiates as well. Based on the variability in exposure, treatment requirements and short-term outcomes may vary between neonates Furthermore, there may have been errors in original data entry, and in the extraction and documentation of data that occurred in the past, which is impossible to verify at the time of the study due to the retrospective nature of the study.

5. Conclusions

The incidence of NAS was higher in infants exposed to methadone in utero compared to those exposed to buprenorphine. However, among neonates who required treatment for NAS, there was no significant difference in the severity of NAS, duration of medical treatment or length of stay between the groups. Treating pregnant women with buprenorphine decreased the risk of the baby developing NAS; however, once NAS treatment was initiated, the type of maternal prenatal exposure was not relevant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; methodology, A.K. and T.H.; formal analysis, A.K.; data curation, A.K., R.B. and E.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K., R.B., E.H. and T.H.; writing—review and editing, A.K., R.B. and T.H.; supervision, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Cooper Health System (Protocol #19-207, approved 30 September 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the waiver of informed consent per the regulations at 45 CFR 46.116(d) and Waiver of HIPAA authorization per the regulations at 45 CFR 164.512(i).

Data Availability Statement

Data are unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support provided by other members of the NICU team who participated in the treatment of these patients. We would also like to acknowledge the support provided by Krystal Hunter with statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Campo, J. Maternal and Newborn Inpatient Stays with a Substance Use or Use-Related Diagnosis; Washington State Office of Financial Management: Olympia, WA, USA, 2016.
  2. Dart, R.C.; Surratt, H.L.; Cicero, T.J.; Parrino, M.W.; Severtson, S.G.; Bucher-Bartelson, B.; Green, J.L. Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hirai, A.H.; Ko, J.Y.; Owens, P.L.; Stocks, C.; Patrick, S.W. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Maternal Opioid-Related Diagnoses in the US, 2010–2017. JAMA 2021, 325, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Desai, R.J.; Huybrechts, K.F.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Mogun, H.; Patorno, E.; Kaltenbach, K.; Kerzner, L.S.; Bateman, B.T. Exposure to prescription opioid analgesics in utero and risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome: Population based cohort study. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2015, 350, h2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Patrick, S.W.; Schumacher, R.E.; Benneyworth, B.D.; Krans, E.E.; McAllister, J.M.; Davis, M.M. Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United states, 2000–2009. JAMA 2012, 307, 1934–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ko, J.Y.; Yoon, J.; Tong, V.T.; Haight, S.C.; Patel, R.; Rockhill, K.M.; Luck, J.; Shapiro-Mendoza, C. Maternal opioid exposure, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and infant healthcare utilization: A retrospective cohort analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 223, 108704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tolia, V.N.; Murthy, K.; Bennett, M.M.; Greenberg, R.G.; Benjamin, D.K.; Smith, P.B.; Clark, R.H. Morphine vs Methadone Treatment for Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 2018, 203, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patrick, S.W.; Davis, M.M.; Lehman, C.U.; Cooper, W.O. Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012. J. Perinatol. Off. J. Calif. Perinat. Assoc. 2015, 35, 667. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaltenbach, K.A.; Finnegan, L.P. Studies of prenatal drug exposure and environmental research issues: The benefits of integrating research within a treatment program. NIDA Res. Monogr. 1992, 117, 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hulse, G.K.; Milne, E.; English, D.R.; Holman, C.D. The relationship between maternal use of heroin and methadone and infant birth weight. Addiction 1997, 92, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patrick, S.W. A Comprehensive Approach to the Opioid Epidemic. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 130, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patrick, S.W.; Dudley, J.; Martin, P.R.; Harrell, F.E.; Warren, M.D.; Hartmann, K.E.; Ely, E.W.; Grijalva, C.G.; Cooper, W.O. Prescription opioid epidemic and infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2015, 135, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Burns, L.; Mattick, R.P.; Lim, K.; Wallace, C. Methadone in pregnancy: Treatment retention and neonatal outcomes. Addiction 2007, 102, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D’Apolito, K. Methadone maintenance and breast feeding: Do they mix? Neonatal Netw. 1994, 13, 64–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Ludlow, J.P.; Evans, S.F.; Hulse, G. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies associated with illicit substance abuse. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004, 44, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jansson, L.M.; Dipietro, J.A.; Velez, M.; Elko, A.; Knauer, H.; Kivlighan, K.T. Maternal methadone dosing schedule and fetal neurobehaviour. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009, 22, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Terplan, M.; Patrick, S.; Jansson, L.M. Re: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and High School Performance. Pediatrics 2017, 139, e20170972B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Brogly, S.B.; Saia, K.A.; Walley, A.Y.; Du, H.M.; Sebastiani, P. Prenatal Buprenorphine Versus Methadone Exposure and Neonatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 180, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ebner, N.; Rohrmeister, K.; Winklbaur, B.; Baewert, A.; Jagsch, R.; Peternell, A.; Thau, K.; Fischer, G. Management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in neonates born to opioid maintained women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 87, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jones, H.E.; Finnegan, L.P.; Kaltenbach, K. Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence in pregnancy. Drugs 2012, 72, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kraft, W.K.; Stover, M.W.; Davis, J.M. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Pharmacologic strategies for the mother and infant. Semin. Perinatol. 2016, 40, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kocherlakota, P. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics 2014, 134, e547–e561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Walsh, S.L.; Preston, K.L.; Bigelow, G.E.; Stitzer, M.L. Acute administration of buprenorphine in humans: Partial agonist and blockade effects. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995, 274, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Mattick, R.P.; Breen, C.; Kimber, J.; Davoli, M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, CD002207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fischer, G.; Johnson, R.E.; Eder, H.; Jagsch, R.; Peternell, A.; Weninger, M.; Langer, M.; Aschauer, H. Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women with buprenorphine. Addiction 2000, 95, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. O’Connor, A.; Alto, W.; Musgrave, K.; Gibbons, D.; Llanto, L.; Holden, S.; Karnes, J. Observational study of buprenorphine treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women in a family medicine residency: Reports on maternal and infant outcomes. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2011, 24, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schindler, S.D.; Eder, H.; Ortner, R.; Rohrmeister, K.; Langer, M.; Fischer, G. Neonatal outcome following buprenorphine maintenance during conception and throughout pregnancy. Addiction 2003, 98, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hall, E.S.; Isemann, B.T.; Wexelblatt, S.L.; Meinzen-Derr, J.; Wiles, J.R.; Harvey, S.; Akinbi, H.T. A Cohort Comparison of Buprenorphine versus Methadone Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 2016, 170, 39–44.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Welle-Strand, G.K.; Skurtveit, S.; Jones, H.E.; Waal, H.; Bakstad, B.; Bjarkø, L.; Ravndal, E. Neonatal outcomes following in utero exposure to methadone or buprenorphine: A National Cohort Study of opioid-agonist treatment of Pregnant Women in Norway from 1996 to 2009. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 127, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Jones, H.E.; Kaltenbach, K.; Heil, S.H.; Stine, S.M.; Coyle, M.G.; Arria, A.M.; O’Grady, K.E.; Selby, P.; Martin, P.R.; Fischer, G. Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 2320–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jones, H.E.; Heil, S.H.; Baewert, A.; Arria, A.M.; Kaltenbach, K.; Martin, P.R.; Coyle, M.G.; Selby, P.; Stine, S.M.; Fischer, G. Buprenorphine treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: A comprehensive review. Addiction 2012, 107 (Suppl. S1), 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pritham, U.A.; Paul, J.A.; Hayes, M.J. Opioid dependency in pregnancy and length of stay for neonatal abstinence syndrome. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2012, 41, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Noormohammadi, A.; Forinash, A.; Yancey, A.; Crannage, E.; Campbell, K.; Shyken, J. Buprenorphine Versus Methadone for Opioid Dependence in Pregnancy. Ann. Pharmacother. 2016, 50, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Metz, V.; Jagsch, R.; Ebner, N.; Würzl, J.; Pribasnig, A.; Aschauer, C.; Fischer, G. Impact of treatment approach on maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnant opioid-maintained women. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2011, 26, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Jones, H.E.; Johnson, R.E.; Jasinski, D.R.; O’grady, K.E.; Chisholm, C.A.; Choo, R.E.; Crocetti, M.; Dudas, R.; Harrow, C.; Huestis, M.A.; et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: Effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005, 79, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kakko, J.; Heilig, M.; Sarman, I. Buprenorphine and methadone treatment of opiate dependence during pregnancy: Comparison of fetal growth and neonatal outcomes in two consecutive case series. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 96, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jones, H.E.; O’Grady, K.E.; Johnson, R.E.; Velez, M.; Jansson, L.M. Infant neurobehavior following prenatal exposure to methadone or buprenorphine: Results from the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Subst. Use Misuse 2010, 45, 2244–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaltenbach, K.; O’grady, K.E.; Heil, S.H.; Salisbury, A.L.; Coyle, M.G.; Fischer, G.; Martin, P.R.; Stine, S.; Jones, H.E. Prenatal exposure to methadone or buprenorphine: Early childhood developmental outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018, 185, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lemon, L.S.; Caritis, S.N.; Venkataramanan, R.; Platt, R.W.; Bodnar, L.M. Methadone Versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Dependence and Risk of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Epidemiology 2018, 29, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Finnegan, L.P. Treatment issues for opioid-dependent women during the perinatal period. J. Psychoact. Drugs 1991, 23, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Finnegan, L.P.; Connaughton, J.F.; Jr Kron, R.E.; Emich, J.P. Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Assessment and management. Addict. Dis. 1975, 2, 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  42. Finnegan, L.P.; Kron, R.E.; Connaughton, J.F.; Emich, J.P. Assessment and treatment of abstinence in the infant of the drug-dependent mother. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Biopharm. 1975, 12, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Green, M.; Suffet, F. The Neonatal Narcotic Withdrawal Index: A device for the improvement of care in the abstinence syndrome. Am. J. Drug Alcohol. Abuse. 1981, 8, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Retskin, C.M.; Wright, M.E. Interobserver Reliability of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool in an Acute Care Setting. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2014, 43, S61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neonatal Drug Withdrawal. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Pediatrics 1998, 101, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar]
  46. Edwards, L.; Brown, L.F. Nonpharmacologic Management of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: An Integrative Review. Neonatal Netw. 2016, 35, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zahorodny, W.; Rom, C.; Whitney, W.; Giddens, S.; Samuel, M.; Maichuk, G.; Marshall, R. The neonatal withdrawal inventory: A simplified score of newborn withdrawal. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 1998, 19, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grisham, L.M.; Stephen, M.M.; Coykendall, M.R.; Kane, M.F.; Maurer, J.A.; Bader, M.Y. Eat, Sleep, Console Approach: A Family-Centered Model for the Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Adv. Neonatal Care 2019, 19, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grossman, M.; Berkwitt, A. Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Semin. Perinatol. 2019, 43, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grossman, M.R.; Lipshaw, M.J.; Osborn, R.R.; Berkwitt, A.K. A Novel Approach to Assessing Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Hosp. Pediatr. 2018, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lipsitz, P.J. A proposed narcotic withdrawal score for use with newborn infants. A pragmatic evaluation of its efficacy. Clin. Pediatr. 1975, 14, 592–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Towers, C.V.; Hyatt, B.W.; Visconti, K.C.; Chernicky, L.; Chattin, K.; Fortner, K.B. Neonatal Head Circumference in Newborns with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Pediatrics 2019, 143, e20180541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Visconti, K.C.; Hennessy, K.C.; Towers, C.V.; Howard, B.C. Chronic opiate use in pregnancy and newborn head circumference. Am. J. Perinatol. 2015, 32, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Haight, S.C.; Ko, J.Y.; Tong, V.T.; Bohm, M.K.; Callaghan, W.M. Opioid Use Disorder Documented at Delivery Hospitalization—United States, 1999–2014. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bateman, B.T.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Rathmell, J.P.; Seeger, J.D.; Doherty, M.; Fischer, M.A.; Huybrechts, K.F. Patterns of opioid utilization in pregnancy in a large cohort of commercial insurance beneficiaries in the United States. Anesthesiology 2014, 120, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Honein, M.A.; Boyle, C.; Redfield, R.R. Public Health Surveillance of Prenatal Opioid Exposure in Mothers and Infants. Pediatrics 2019, 143, e20183801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kushnir, A.; Bleznak, J.L.; Saslow, J.G.; Stahl, G. Nurses’ Finnegan Scoring of Newborns with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Not Affected by Time or Day of the Week. Am. J. Perinatol. 2020, 37, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hudak, M.L.; Tan, R.C.; Committee on Drugs; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics 2012, 129, e540–e560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ordean, A.; Chisamore, B. Clinical presentation and management of neonatal abstinence syndrome: An update. Res. Rep. Neonatol. 2014, 2014, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Larson, J.J.; Graham, D.L.; Singer, L.T.; Beckwith, A.M.; Terplan, M.; Davis, J.M.; Martinez, J.; Bada, H.S. Cognitive and Behavioral Impact on Children Exposed to Opioids During Pregnancy. Pediatrics 2019, 144, e20190514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miller, J.S.; Anderson, J.G.; Erwin, P.C.; Davis, S.K.; Lindley, L.C. The Effects of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome on Language Delay from Birth to 10 Years. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2020, 51, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gaalema, D.E.; Scott, T.L.; Heil, S.H.; Coyle, M.G.; Kaltenbach, K.; Badger, G.J.; Arria, A.M.; Stine, S.M.; Martin, P.R.; Jones, H.E. Differences in the profile of neonatal abstinence syndrome signs in methadone- versus buprenorphine-exposed neonates. Addiction 2012, 107 (Suppl. S1), 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Colombini, N.; Elias, R.; Busuttil, M.; Dubuc, M.; Einaudi, M.A.; Bues-Charbit, M. Hospital morphine preparation for abstinence syndrome in newborns exposed to buprenorphine or methadone. Pharm. World Sci. 2008, 30, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ryan, G.; Dooley, J.; Gerber Finn, L.; Kelly, L. Nonpharmacological management of neonatal abstinence syndrome: A review of the literature. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 1735–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dryden, C.; Young, D.; Hepburn, M.; Mactier, H. Maternal methadone use in pregnancy: Factors associated with the development of neonatal abstinence syndrome and implications for healthcare resources. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009, 116, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Winkelman, T.N.A.; Villapiano, N.; Kozhimannil, K.B.; Davis, M.M.; Patrick, S.W. Incidence and Costs of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Among Infants with Medicaid: 2004–2014. Pediatrics 2018, 141, e20173520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Monnelly, V.J.; Anblagan, D.; Quigley, A.; Cabez, M.B.; Cooper, E.S.; Mactier, H.; Semple, S.I.; Bastin, M.E.; Boardman, J.P. Prenatal methadone exposure is associated with altered neonatal brain development. Neuroimage Clin. 2018, 18, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ferrari, A.; Coccia, C.P.; Bertolini, A.; Sternieri, E. Methadone—Metabolism, pharmacokinetics and interactions. Pharmacol. Res. 2004, 50, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Coles, L.D.; Lee, I.J.; Hassan, H.E.; Eddington, N.D. Distribution of saquinavir, methadone, and buprenorphine in maternal brain, placenta, and fetus during two different gestational stages of pregnancy in mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98, 2832–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Drake, P.; Driscoll, A.K.; Mathews, T.J. Cigarette Smoking During Pregnancy: United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018, 305, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Children 10 01030 g001 550
Figure 1. Length of Stay of Neonates with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone vs. Buprenorphine. *—significantly higher LOS in the Met alone group compared to the other groups, p < 0.05. Met—methadone exposure alone, Bup—buprenorphine exposure alone, Met+—methadone in conjunction with other drugs or opiates, and Bup+—buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs.
Figure 1. Length of Stay of Neonates with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone vs. Buprenorphine. *—significantly higher LOS in the Met alone group compared to the other groups, p < 0.05. Met—methadone exposure alone, Bup—buprenorphine exposure alone, Met+—methadone in conjunction with other drugs or opiates, and Bup+—buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs.
Children 10 01030 g001
Children 10 01030 g002 550
Figure 2. Duration of NAS Treatment Based on Prenatal Exposure. Met—methadone exposure alone, Bup—buprenorphine exposure alone, Met+—methadone in conjunction with other drugs or opiates, and Bup+—buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs. No significant difference in LOT was noted between groups.
Figure 2. Duration of NAS Treatment Based on Prenatal Exposure. Met—methadone exposure alone, Bup—buprenorphine exposure alone, Met+—methadone in conjunction with other drugs or opiates, and Bup+—buprenorphine in conjunction with other drugs. No significant difference in LOT was noted between groups.
Children 10 01030 g002
Table
Table 1. Maternal and infant characteristics of neonates who required treatment for NOWS.
Table 1. Maternal and infant characteristics of neonates who required treatment for NOWS.
Methadone Alone
(n = 54)		Met+
(n = 82)		Buprenorphine
Alone (n = 22)		Bup+
(n = 12)		p
Birth weight, grams (±SD)2918 ± 6352857 ± 4573417 ± 4793099 ± 449<0.001 *
Gestational age, weeks (±SD)38.9 ± 2.338.5 ± 1.839.6 ± 1.738.7 ± 1.70.1
5 min Apgar99990.8
Gender 0.2
Male, n (%)34 (63)38 (48)13 (59)8 (67)
Race, n (%) 0.6
Caucasian47 (87)72 (88)20 (91)11 (92)
African-American3 (6)4 (5)00
Hispanic4 (7)6 (7)2 (9)1 (8)
Delivery 0.3
C/S, n (%)34 (63)55 (67)16 (73)11 (92)
Food, n (%) 0.03 *
BM1 (2)000
Formula35 (66)75 (91)14 (67)10 (83)
Both17 (32)7 (9)7 (33)2 (17)
Ethanol, n (%)3 (6)11(14)2 (10)00.3
Tobacco, n (%)35 (65)60 (75)9 (43)7 (58)0.04 *
Met+—neonates exposed to methadone with other substances while in utero, Bup+—neonates exposed to buprenorphine in addition to other substances while in utero; c/s—delivery via cesarian section; food—BM/Formula/Both = breast milk/formula or both used to feed the baby during the stay. Only complete data was used, patients with missing data were not included in the analysis. * = p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics related to treatment of NOWS.
Table 2. Characteristics related to treatment of NOWS.
Methadone Alone
(n = 54)		Met+
(n = 82)		Buprenorphine Alone
(n = 22)		Bup+
(n = 12)		p
Developing NAS, %857555150.001 *
Max opiate dose, mg/kg/day (SD)0.2 (0.09)0.22 (0.12)0.15 (0.02)0.16 (0.11)0.02 *
Mean Finnegan score on initial
treatment day (SD)		8.9 (2)9 (1.8)9.6 (3.7)9.1 (3.5)0.6
Day of life morphine started, day (SD)3.8 (1.9)3.3 (1.8)4 (2)3.5 (1.6)0.3
Day of life morphine wean started, days (SD)13 (7)12.7 (7.1)9.8 (7.6)12.4 (11)0.4
Maximum Finnegan score prior to morphine start (SD)11.8 (2.2)11.7 (2.3)12 (3.4)12 (3.1)1
Mean LOT, days (SD)29.2 (15)33 (18)23.7 (12)29.3 (19)0.11
Mean LOS, days (SD)35.2 (17)39 (19)28.3 (12)34.1 (20)0.08
Met+—neonates exposed to methadone with other substances while in utero, Bup+—neonates ex-posed to buprenorphine in addition to other substances while in utero; SD—standard deviation; LOT—length of opioid treatment for NAS; LOS—length of stay in the hospital. Comparisons between the groups were made using Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous data and chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data. Only complete data was used, patients with missing data were not included in the analysis. The difference was considered significant at p < 0.05 (*).
Table
Table 3. Head circumference measurements in neonates treated for NAS.
Table 3. Head circumference measurements in neonates treated for NAS.
Methadone
Alone (n = 54)		Met+
(n = 82)		Buprenorphine
Alone (n = 22)		Bup+
(n = 12)		p
Birth HC, cm (SD)32.7 (2)32.9 (2)33.3 (2)33.3 (2)0.51
Birth HC% (SD)24.8 (22)26.8 (25)36.4 (31)27 (30)0.33
Discharge HC, cm (SD)35.1 (2)35.7 (2)36 (2)36.1 (2)0.15
Discharge HC% (SD)24.4 (19)29.8 (24.3)46.8 (27)39.3 (26)0.002 *
HC rate of growth, cm/day (SD)0.08 (0.04)0.08 (0.04)0.09 (0.04)0.09 (0.07)0.28
HC—head circumference, in centimeters (cm) or percent (%); SD—standard deviation; Birth HC%—percentile measurement of head circumference at birth; * = p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kushnir, A.; Bhavsar, R.; Hanna, E.; Hegyi, T. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone versus Buprenorphine. Children 2023, 10, 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061030

AMA Style

Kushnir A, Bhavsar R, Hanna E, Hegyi T. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone versus Buprenorphine. Children. 2023; 10(6):1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kushnir, Alla, Ravi Bhavsar, Emad Hanna, and Thomas Hegyi. 2023. "Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone versus Buprenorphine" Children 10, no. 6: 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop