Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing the In Vitro Maturation (IVM) of Human Oocyte
Next Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Opportunities of IL-22 in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Peripheral Cytokine Levels as a Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: A Review of Existing Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hepatokines and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Linking Liver Pathophysiology to Metabolism
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Metabolic Fatty Liver Disease in Children: A Growing Public Health Problem

Biomedicines 2021, 9(12), 1915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121915
by Sébastien Le Garf 1, Véronique Nègre 1, Rodolphe Anty 2 and Philippe Gual 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2021, 9(12), 1915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121915
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 9 December 2021 / Accepted: 11 December 2021 / Published: 14 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NAFLD: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Approaches)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I read with great interest the paper “Metabolic fatty liver disease in children: a growing public health problem" by Le Garf et al.

 The article is well written, and only minor spell check is needed. The paper has a good design. The article is logically divided into sections and subsections. There are several tables and figures of good quality. The references cited are relevant and adequate. Some sections, though, should be expanded.

Major comments:

  1. “2.4. Intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms” section must be improved as it is too summarized (DOI: 3390/pr9010135; DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2203082).
  2. “4.2.2 Pharmacological approaches” as all trials are ongoing and few data about efficacy are available, it would be advisable also to talk about safety. In fact, one of the main causes of discontinuation in adults of SGLT2i are urinary infections, which, I suggest there would be even more in children, according to their age.
  3. 608-609: not only semaglutide, but it is a drug class benefit. Moreover, it also interest SGLT2i (DOI:3390/ijms22115863).

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his/her important comments

 

  • “2.4. Intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms” section must be improved as it is too summarized (DOI: 3390/pr9010135; DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2203082).

We have now expanded this section and included additional reports, including recommended articles.

Caturano et al., 2021: cited lines 181-192

Galiero et al., 2021: cited lines 194-197

 

  • “4.2.2 Pharmacological approaches” as all trials are ongoing and few data about efficacy are available, it would be advisable also to talk about safety. In fact, one of the main causes of discontinuation in adults of SGLT2i are urinary infections, which, I suggest there would be even more in children, according to their age.

We have now clarified these important details in Table 2 and in the main manuscript (Lines 501-502): please see the attachment. 

 

  • 608-609: not only semaglutide, but it is a drug class benefit. Moreover, it also interests SGLT2i (DOI:3390/ijms22115863).

Moreover, GLP-1 agonist and SGLT-2i have demonstrated a protective effect on cardio-vascular events and renal complications in adults (Toyama et al., 2021; Pasternak et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2021).

  • Lines 669-673

However, all these treatments present potential side effects in adults, particularly in some of them who have urinary tract infections such as SGLT2, so these complications should be particularly sought out in children.

  • Table 3 (Line 692)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well written review that focuses on the development of MALD and NASH in the pediatric population. The review includes all of the important topics and contributes to the field.

Minor:

Line 334 define NASPGHAN

Line 368 define BMI Z score

Line 434 define how the index and score are determined

 

Author Response

We are delighted that the reviewer appreciated our work. Below are the responses to the minor comments Minor comments:

 

  • Line 334 define NASPGHAN

We have now clarified the NASPGHAN definition (Executive Council of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN)), lines 380-381.

 

  • Line 368 define BMI Z score

We have now defined the BMI Z-score (also called BMI standard deviation score, a measure of relative weight adjusted for child age, height and sex), lines 413-414.

 

  • Line 434 define how the index and score are determined

We have now indicated the different clinical and biological data necessary to calculate the different scores or indexes of hepatic fibrosis (cf. line 502): please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am satisfied with authors answer. In my opinion, the paper can be further process for publication.

Back to TopTop