Next Article in Journal
Lactobacillus plantarum Generate Electricity through Flavin Mononucleotide-Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer to Upregulate Epithelial Type I Collagen Expression and Thereby Promote Microbial Adhesion to Intestine
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Asthma
Previous Article in Journal
Suppression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-Alpha Overcomes Resistance to Trastuzumab through STAT3-Dependent IL-6 Reduction in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/biomedicines11030676
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of the Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Bronchodilator Drug Response in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Asthma

by
Mario Martin-Almeida
1,†,
Javier Perez-Garcia
1,†,
Esther Herrera-Luis
1,
Carlos Rosa-Baez
1,
Mario Gorenjak
2,
Anne H. Neerincx
3,
Olaia Sardón-Prado
4,5,
Antoaneta A. Toncheva
6,
Susanne Harner
6,
Christine Wolff
6,
Susanne Brandstetter
6,
Elisa Valletta
6,
Mahmoud I. Abdel-Aziz
3,7,
Simone Hashimoto
3,8,
Vojko Berce
2,9,
Paula Corcuera-Elosegui
4,
Javier Korta-Murua
4,5,
Heike Buntrock-Döpke
6,
Susanne J. H. Vijverberg
3,
Joris C. Verster
10,11,
Nikki Kerssemakers
10,
Anna M Hedman
12,
Catarina Almqvist
12,
Jesús Villar
13,14,
Aletta D. Kraneveld
10,
Uroš Potočnik
2,9,15,
Michael Kabesch
6,
Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee
3,8,
Maria Pino-Yanes
1,13,16,* and
on behalf of the SysPharmPediA Consortium
‡add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Genomics and Health Group, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Cell Biology, and Genetics, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
2
Center for Human Molecular Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
3
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres—Loc. AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4
Division of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Donostia University Hospital, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain
5
Department of Pediatrics, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48013 San Sebastián, Spain
6
Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergy, University Children’s Hospital Regensburg (KUNO) at the Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, University of Regensburg, D-93049 Regensburg, Germany
7
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
8
Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
9
Clinic of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
10
Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
11
Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
12
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
13
CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
14
Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunction Evaluation Research Network, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
15
Laboratory for Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Genomics, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
16
Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB), Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
The SysPharmPediA Consortium authors are listed in the Supplementary SI of this manuscript.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(3), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030676
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Asthma Research in a Multiomics Era)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Asthma is the most prevalent pediatric chronic disease. Bronchodilator drug response (BDR) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are clinical biomarkers of asthma. Although DNA methylation (DNAm) contributes to asthma pathogenesis, the influence of DNAm on BDR and FeNO is scarcely investigated. This study aims to identify DNAm markers in whole blood associated either with BDR or FeNO in pediatric asthma. We analyzed 121 samples from children with moderate-to-severe asthma. The association of genome-wide DNAm with BDR and FeNO has been assessed using regression models, adjusting for age, sex, ancestry, and tissue heterogeneity. Cross-tissue validation was assessed in 50 nasal samples. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and enrichment in traits and biological pathways were assessed. A false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1 and a genome-wide significance threshold of p < 9 × 10−8 were used to control for false-positive results. The CpG cg12835256 (PLA2G12A) was genome-wide associated with FeNO in blood samples (coefficient= −0.015, p = 2.53 × 10−9) and nominally associated in nasal samples (coefficient = −0.015, p = 0.045). Additionally, three CpGs were suggestively associated with BDR (FDR < 0.1). We identified 12 and four DMRs associated with FeNO and BDR (FDR < 0.05), respectively. An enrichment in allergic and inflammatory processes, smoking, and aging was observed. We reported novel associations of DNAm markers associated with BDR and FeNO enriched in asthma-related processes.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a heterogeneous respiratory disease that affects more than 330 million people worldwide and is the most prevalent chronic disease in children. Moreover, asthma is associated with one in every 250 deaths worldwide [1]. Characterized by chronic airway inflammation and variable expiratory airflow limitation, asthma is defined by its symptoms, including wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and cough, which may vary over time and in intensity. Anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator drugs are the main therapy to control asthma symptoms, improve lung function, and reduce the risk of severe exacerbations [2]. However, less than 5% of pediatric asthma patients have severe asthma, defined as uncontrolled asthma that often does not respond to the currently available medications despite adherence to maximal optimized high doses [3]. Severe asthma patients have the lowest quality of life and the highest risk for morbidity and mortality, and their treatment consumes the majority of healthcare resources due to asthma [3].
The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and the bronchodilator drug response (BDR) are two of the main clinical biomarkers that can be objectively measured for asthma diagnosis and for assessing treatment response. FeNO is the only available non-invasive biomarker for type 2 airway inflammation in asthma. It can be quantified in exhaled air of children and adults through portable and non-invasive devices. FeNO levels in exhaled air have been related to chronic inflammatory diseases, Th2-mediated immune responses, and airway eosinophilia [2]. BDR measures changes in lung function after administration of short-acting β2-agonists [4], the main rapid-onset airway bronchodilators. BDR is also associated with the severity and instability of asthma and is also frequently used for asthma phenotyping. FeNO and BDR are conditioned by genetic and environmental factors [5,6].
Precision medicine aims to improve the prevention and treatment of diseases based on features inherent to each patient [7]. The genetic background greatly contributes to asthma, estimating the heritability of asthma susceptibility over 55–90% and 70% to treatment response [7]. However, currently reported genetic variants only partially explain this heritability. Asthma is a multifactorial disease, and susceptibility and treatment response are influenced by genetic variation and environmental factors [7]. DNA methylation (DNAm), an epigenetic mechanism that reflects the interaction between both genetic and environmental factors, could explain part of the heritability of asthma treatment response [8]. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have identified promising CpG sites and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) involved in asthma [9,10]. Despite being useful clinical biomarkers in the management of asthma, the relationship of DNAm with FeNO and BDR has been scarcely investigated. Cardenas et al. [9] profiled DNAm in nasal cells in 547 children from different populations and identified a large set of CpGs and DMRs associated with multiple asthma-related phenotypes, including FeNO (8,372 CpGs and 191 DMRs with FDR < 0.05) and BDR (130 CpGs with an FDR < 0.05). They reported that FeNO-associated epigenetic markers were enriched in intracellular membrane trafficking, T cell activation, oxidative stress, mucin production, neutrophil degranulation, and interleukin pathways. Multiple DMRs were located in asthma-associated genes, including TNIP-1, IL-13, and CHI3L1. For the BDR trait, they did not report any significant DMRs and observed that the associated epigenetic markers did not overlap with any other asthma-related phenotype. However, this study only included 12% of individuals with current asthma. On the other hand, FeNO-related genes, including multiple nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and arginase (ARG) isoforms, have been evaluated in candidate-gene epigenetic studies, but controversial results of the effect of epigenetic markers in these genes and FeNO have been reported [11,12].
The association of FeNO and BDR with both environmental and genetic factors has been reported, but its relationship with the epigenome in asthma patients remains barely investigated. Thus, we hypothesize that DNAm from whole blood is a biomarker associated with BDR and FeNO that captures the influence of environmental and genetic factors on these clinical biomarkers. Therefore, this study aimed to identify DNAm markers in whole blood associated with BDR or FeNO in pediatric asthma, assess whether they are shared with nasal epithelium cells, and analyze their enrichment in previous associations and/or biological processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This study was conducted in children with moderate-to-severe asthma from the Systems Pharmacology Approach to Uncontrolled Pediatric Asthma (SysPharmPediA) consortium (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04865575) [13]. This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committees of participating institutions: University Regensburg, Germany (18-1034-101); Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Basque Country, Spain [PI2015075 (SO)]; Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, The Netherlands (NL55788.041.15); National Medical Ethics Committee, Slovenia (0120-569/2017/4); and Ethical Regional Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden (Dnr 2010/1336-31/3 and 2019-00546). All parents and participants provided signed written consent and agreed to participate in the study. The study design and characteristics of the enrolled patients have already been described elsewhere [13]. Briefly, patients were enrolled in four European countries (Spain, The Netherlands, Slovenia, and Germany) according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) aged between 6 and 17 years old, (2) physician’s diagnosis of asthma, and (3) moderate-to-severe patients with asthma treated with medication step ≥ 3 according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines [2]. In the current study, only individuals with available data on BDR and/or FeNO were included.
Clinical and demographic variables of interest were recorded using standardized questionnaires. Asthma control was assessed based on (childhood) Asthma Control Test (ACT/cACT) and the development of asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as having an ACT/cACT score ≤ 19 or ≥ 1 exacerbation requiring oral corticosteroids or severe exacerbation requiring hospitalization or emergency room visits in the past year. Controlled asthma was defined as asthma patients with an ACT/cACT score > 19 and no severe exacerbations in the past year. Body mass index (BMI) was estimated as BMI = weight (kg)/height (m2). According to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, we expressed BMI as z-scores [14].

2.2. Measurement of FeNO and BDR

Spirometry tests pre- and post-administration of bronchodilator and FeNO assessment were performed according to the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) guidelines [15,16], as previously described [13]. BDR was calculated based on the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), expressed in liters, as BDR = postFEV 1 − preFEV 1 preFEV 1 × 100. FeNO values were reported as parts per billion (ppb).

2.3. Genome-Wide Methylation Assessment and Quality Control

Blood samples were collected in K-EDTA vacutainer tubes for subsequent downstream applications, including genotyping and methylation profiling. Genomic DNA was isolated using the FlexiGene DNA Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After concentration measurements and quality control (QC), the samples were equilibrated to 10 ng/µL, and a total of 500 ng DNA was utilized for bisulfite conversion. Next, methylation levels of 865,918 CpG sites across the whole genome were assessed using the Infinium Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip array (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Raw data QC was conducted using the ENmix package (1.28.8) [17] in R (4.1.2) [18]. First, we removed low-quality samples and probes. Methylation data points were defined as low-quality data if their signal did not differ from negative control (detection p-value > 1 × 10−6) and/or they were measured by < 3 beads. Based on that, low-quality CpG probes were defined as those having ≥ 5% of bad-quality data points across samples. Low-quality samples were defined as (1) the presence of ≥ 5% of bad quality data points across CpGs, (2) having total bisulfite intensity less than three standard deviations than bisulfite controls, and/or (3) outliers of bisulfite intensity or beta value distribution.
We used the out-of-band (oob) method for background noise correction. Bisulfite intensities were normalized by quantile normalization to reduce variability among arrays. The EPIC array uses two different dyes and types of probes; (i) Regression on Correlated Probes (RCP) and (ii) the Regression on Logarithm of Internal Control (RELIC) methods [19,20] to correct dye- and probe-type biases. Methylation intensities were used to estimate beta values. Furthermore, outlier methylation data points for each CpG, defined as values below/above three times the interquartile range (IQR) from the first/third quantiles, were set as missing values. CpGs and samples with a missing rate of ≥5% and ≥10%, respectively, were removed. The remaining missing values were imputed (k-nearest neighbor method). Moreover, we estimated the predicted sex based on methylation data and discarded one sample with sex discordance between the reported and predicted sex.
We removed first- and second-degree related individuals previously identified based on genotype data obtained with the Global Screening Array (GSA, Illumina Inc.). Since we included both males and females, we removed probes within sex chromosomes. Potential cross-sample contamination was assessed based on the distribution of beta-values of the control genotype probes included in the EPIC array. We used the ewastools R package [21] to identify potential cross-sample contaminated individuals and inspected the beta value distribution plots. Potential problematic probes that may capture other artifacts different than methylation were also filtered out. These include probes: (1) with a multimodal distribution of beta values, (2) cross-reactive or non-specific, which bind non-specifically to the target region of interest [22], and (3) potentially polymorphic probes defined as those containing a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1% based on the Illumina v1.0 B4 manifest file at the CpG site or a single base extension. Finally, beta values were transformed into M-values for improved statistical properties [23].

2.4. Estimation of Cell-Type Heterogeneity and Potential Confounders

Cell-type heterogeneity is the major confounder in EWAS performed in primary tissues. In whole blood, DNAm captures the epigenetic states of a mixture of cell types. These distinct methylation profiles may lead to false discoveries when looking for their correlation with the phenotype of interest [24]. Therefore, cell-type heterogeneity in whole blood was captured using the Reference-Free Adjustment for Cell-Type composition (ReFACTor) [24] algorithm in GLINT 1.0.4, adjusting for sex, age, and the first six genotype principal components (PCs). This method estimates a set of PCs correlated with cell-type composition and could be included as covariates in subsequent analyses to correct this major confounder. A principal component regression analysis was used to test for association between multiple potential confounding variables and global DNAm.

2.5. Epigenome-Wide Association Study

We conducted an EWAS to identify single CpG sites across the genome associated with FeNO or BDR. The association between the methylation M-values and FeNO/BDR was tested through linear regression models using the limma v3.48.3 R package [25], adjusting for age, sex, ancestry (six genotype PCs), and the first six ReFACTor components. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 10% was used to correct for multiple comparisons. The p-value < 9 × 10−8 threshold was used to declare genome-wide significant association, as recommended for the EPIC array [26]. Genome inflation factor (λ) and quantile–quantile plots (Q-Q plots) of regression p-values were examined to inspect genomic inflation. Probes were annotated to the nearest gene based on the Illumina manifest file v1.0 B4 [27] and GREAT v4.0.4 [28]. Furthermore, we evaluated the robustness of the results by conducting sensitivity analyses adjusting for ICS dosage and recruiting center and stratified analysis by sex, age, and ethnicity. Potentially problematic probes were filtered out for subsequent analyses.

2.6. Cross-Tissue Validation

We attempted to evaluate the effect of the CpGs identified in whole blood samples in 62 nasal samples. Clinical data are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Nasal epithelial cells were collected using sterile nasal swabs (Paul Böttger OHG, Bodenmais, Germany) and stored at −80 °C until processing. Genomic DNA was isolated using the MasterPure Complete DNA & RNA Purification Kit (Lucigen, Teddington, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genome-wide DNAm profiling was carried out using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array. QC of DNAm data, cell-tissue heterogeneity assessment, and association analyses were conducted following the same procedures described for the blood samples.

2.7. Differentially Methylated Regions

A DMR analysis was conducted to identify genomic regions of several CpG sites in which the global DNAm might be associated with our outcomes of interest. Two independent software, comb-p [29] and DMRcate [30], were used to identify DMRs associated with BDR and FeNO. Regions were identified based on CpGs with p-value < 0.05 (comb-p) or FDR ≤ 0.2 (DMRcate), and those CpGs located within 750 bp (comb-p) or 1000 bp (DMRcate) were combined into the same region. Only DMRs significant after correcting for multiple testing overlapping in both methods (adjusted p-value < 0.05) were retained. Comb-p was used to identify DMRs associated with BDR and FeNO in nasal samples using the same parameters as in the discovery phase.

2.8. Enrichment Analyses

Enrichment analysis was next performed to identify whether a set of CpGs or genes were more likely to be related to biological pathways, gene ontology terms, or different traits than by chance. The top 100 probes from the EWAS of FeNO and BDR were included in CpG-set enrichment analyses to identify an enrichment of CpGs previously associated with any traits through EWAS. These analyses were carried out using the EWAS Toolkit [31]. Furthermore, the genes to which these CpGs were annotated were included in gene-set enrichment analyses to identify enrichment in biological pathways and gene ontologies using Enrichr [32].

3. Results

3.1. Quality Control of DNAm Data and Assessment of Global DNAm Patterns

After QC, epigenomic data were available for 124 individuals and 773,260 CpGs from whole blood, and 55 individuals and 636,555 CpGs from nasal epithelia were available for subsequent analyses. The individuals and CpGs removed or flagged during the QC are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. The principal regression analysis plot showed that age, sex, ReFACTor principal components (capturing cell-heterogeneity), and ancestry had the most significant associations with global methylation patterns (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). As a result, these variables were considered the most relevant confounders to be included as covariates in the association analyses. FeNO and BDR also showed significant associations with global methylation patterns.

3.2. Study Population

A total of 109 and 121 asthma patients from SysPharmPediA with available FeNO and BDR and epigenomic data in blood were analyzed. Their main characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, for the 121 patients, the median age was 12.0 years old, and 62% were male. The median FeNO was 16.0 ppb (IQR = 9.0–38.0), and the median BDR was 4.2% (IQR = 0.6–11.3). Most children were European (79.3%), and 63.6% had uncontrolled asthma. Regarding lung function, the median predicted percentage values were 93.6% (IQR = 82.5–103.2) and 99.4% (IQR = 91.2–108.1) for pre-FEV1 and pre-forced vital capacity (pre-FVC), respectively.

3.3. Epigenome-Wide Association Study

We did not observe genomic inflation both in the EWAS of BDR (λ = 1.04) (Figure 1A) and FeNO (λ = 1.03) (Figure 1C), indicating an optimal control for cell heterogeneity and other confounders. A total of three CpGs were significantly associated with BDR with FDR < 0.1 (Table 2, Figure 1B). The top hit was the CpG cg26203256, located in the ADD3-AS1 gene, in which DNAm was associated with lower BDR (coefficient = −0.02, p = 1.85 × 10−7). On the other hand, the CpG cg12835256 located near PLA2G12A was genome-wide significantly associated with a reduction in FeNO (coefficient = −0.015, p = 2.53 × 10−9) (Table 2, Figure 1D). The negative coefficients for both associations suggest that these CpG are more likely to be hypomethylated in patients with higher FeNO or BDR values. These associations remained robust in all sensitivity analyses considering ICS dosage, recruiting centers, and ethnicity (Supplementary Table S3). The top-hit CpG cg12835256 (PLA2G12A) was cross-tissue associated in nasal samples (coefficient = −0.015, p = 0.045, Supplementary Table S4). This CpG is flagged in Illumina’s manifest file as a potential polymorphic probe. However, the potentially implicated SNP (rs4557260) is almost monomorphic in our population (minor allele count = 1).
Given that the age of the patients recruited in the study included puberty onset (13 years), where asthma prevalence trend switches between males and females [33,34], we also performed sensitivity analyses stratifying by sex and age. In the sex-stratified analysis, with the exception of the CpG from C21orf91, the rest of the CpGs were significant and showed consistent effects in both sexes (Supplementary Table S5). In the age-stratified analysis, all CpGs showed consistent effects in both age groups, but the one from FAM69B was not statistically significant in patients younger than 13 years old (Supplementary Table S5).

3.4. Differentially Methylated Regions

Four DMRs were associated with BDR using two independent software (adjusted p-value < 0.05) (Table 3). The top-hit was a region of 699 bp located in C5orf63 (FDR = 2.80 × 10−7). The other DMRs were annotated to PPFIBP2, RAMP1, and LY6G5C. The top hit DMR located in C5orf63 was cross-tissue validated in nasal samples (5: 126409007-5: 126409455, 9 CpGs, region p-value = 6.30 × 10−7, adjusted p-value = 9.54 × 10−4). In addition, 12 DMRs were associated with FeNO (adjusted p-value < 0.05) (Table 3). The top hit was a region of 1,458 bp located in PPP5D1 (FDR = 1.48 × 10−18). The other DMRs were annotated to EGR3, ODF3L1, HOXA6, HOXA-AS3, HOXA4, AURKC, MOGAT3, HOXA7, PDZRN4, MAGI2-AS3, and PTGS1. The majority of DMRs showed a negative coefficient, indicating they are more likely hypomethylated in patients with higher FeNO or BDR values.

3.5. Enrichment Analyses

Regarding the EWAS of BDR, the gene-set enrichment analysis revealed enrichment in several pathways relevant to asthma, including IL-5 (FDR = 1.1 × 10−2), IL-2 (FDR = 4.2 × 10−2), Fc epsilon Receptor I signaling pathways (FDR = 3.3 × 10−2), and cellular aging (FDR = 4.2 × 10−2) (Supplementary Table S6). The CpG-set analyses showed enrichment in several traits, but they were supported only by one CpG (Supplementary Figure S3). The CpGs associated with FeNO demonstrated enrichment in previous EWAS associations, including aging (p = 1.33 × 10−82, 44 CpGs), smoking (p = 9.19 × 10−16, 13 CpGs), and puberty (p = 1.30 × 10−11, 6 CpGs) (Figure 2). The gene-set analysis only revealed the enrichment of genes implicated in the mechanism of action of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (odds ratio [OR] = 138.18, FDR = 7.38 × 10−3, effect-causing genes: PPARA and PTGS1).

4. Discussion

This study investigated the role of DNAm in two clinical biomarkers, FeNO and BDR, in children with moderate-to-severe asthma. We identified one CpG located in the PLA2G12A gene as genome-wide significantly associated with FeNO and three CpGs significantly associated with BDR. Furthermore, twelve and four DMRs were related to FeNO and BDR, respectively. In addition, the top-hit CpG and DMR associated with FeNO and BDR, respectively, were cross-tissue validated in nasal samples. CpG-set and gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment in previous EWAS signals and biological pathways involved in asthma. Our findings are relevant by providing new perspectives on the influence of DNAm on asthma biomarkers in pediatric asthma. Although some results overlap with a previous study (e.g., biological pathways such as interleukin signaling), our CpGs and differentially methylated sites and also its implications in biological pathways had not been previously reported by Cardenas et al. [9].
The CpG genome-wide, significantly associated with FeNO in whole blood and cross-validated in nasal samples (cg12835256), is located at the gene encoding for phospholipase A2 Group XIIA (PLA2G12A), a member of a group of phospholipases with a key role as regulators of type-2 inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and eicosanoids production in asthma [35]. This enzyme, highly expressed in airway cells [36], acts as a high-affinity ligand for the PLA2R1 receptor, whose expression is elevated in children with asthma compared to healthy patients [37]. We also reported another CpG associated with FeNO, annotated to the chromosome 21 open reading frame 91 (C21orf91) gene. In a previous study, this gene was observed to be co-expressed with the IL-6 receptor (IL-R6), which has been associated with asthma risk. [38]. The complex IL-6/IL6R triggers a cascade that activates STAT3 and CEBP transcription factors, both involved in airway inflammation and asthma [39]. Increased levels of IL-6 have been related to impaired altered lung function and the use of high-dose ICS [40].
The most significant DMR for FeNO was annotated to PPP5D1, a pseudogene whose role in asthma is still unclear. Furthermore, we reported a DMR associated with FeNO located near EGR3. This gene encodes for a protein member of the early growth factors (EGR), which regulate the expression of genes related to inflammation and cell growth [41]. In addition, EGR3 was reported to be overexpressed in the lung of asthma patients and regulates the expression of IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 [42,43,44]. The other DMRs associated with FeNO are located in genes of the HOXA gene family (i.e., HOXA-AS3, HOXA7, and HOXA4), AURKC, MAGI2-AS3, PDZRN4, and MOGAT3. HOXA-AS3 encodes a long noncoding RNA identified as a positive regulator of the necrosis factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling [45]. NF-κB is a well-known transcription factor that leads to the expression of multiple pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines and chemokines) involved in asthma [46]. In addition, MOGAT3 encodes a protein that catalyzes the synthesis of diacylglycerol, a metabolite that attenuates the pathological consequences of inflammatory processes [47]. Furthermore, DNAm markers in HOXA7 and HOXA4 genes have been associated with lung development and asthma [48], while DNAm in AURKC has been associated with lung function in Latino children with asthma [49]. Finally, MAGI2-AS3 encodes a lncRNA previously associated with asthma-related functions and pathways, such as cytokine production, cell proliferation, and kinase activity [50].
We reported the association of three epigenetic markers with BDR, located in ADD3-AS1, PARP2, and FAM69B. The ADD3-AS1 gene is located in the antisense strand of ADD3, whose gene expression patterns correlate with serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in atopic asthma patients [51]. The PARP2 encodes a protein from PARP enzymes, which play key roles in asthma pathogenesis by affecting the expression of pro-inflammatory genes and chemokines [52]. Furthermore, we reported DMRs associated with BDR annotated to C5orf63 (validated in nasal samples), PPFIBP2, LY6G5C, and RAMP1. The receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) is a component of the Calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP) receptor. Studies questioning the role of CGRP during allergic asthma have been contradictory, suggesting both protective (e.g., maintenance of vascular tone) and inflammation-promoting roles [53].
The epigenetic markers identified in this study showed enrichment in traits and biological processes, including PPARs, interleukins (IL-5 and IL-2), FcERI signaling pathways, smoking, and aging. PPARs have been established as critical components of type 2 immune response to allergens. The mechanism of action of PPARs is characterized by the ability to regulate lipid metabolism and inhibit proinflammatory transcription factors (e.g., NF-κB), which could make them a therapeutic target for asthma [54]. Patients with severe asthma have abnormal production of type 2 cytokines, whereas IL-5 is the main mediator of eosinophilic inflammation [55]. Similarly, alterations in the FcERI pathway are described in allergic diseases and associated with asthma exacerbations and allergic inflammation [56]. Interestingly, the strongest enrichment signal was related to aging. In the context of asthma, epigenetic age acceleration has been associated with asthma, allergic phenotypes, IgE, and FeNO [9,57]. In addition, we identified enrichment in CpGs related to smoking and second-hand smoke, which are well-known risk factors for asthma, impaired lung function, and unresponsiveness to corticosteroids [58].
We acknowledge some strengths of this work. Our study on pediatric patients provides a novel insight into a specific asthma phenotype that has been widely understudied: moderate-to-severe asthma. Moreover, we have controlled our analyses for known confounders in EWAS, such as age, sex, tissue heterogeneity, and ancestry. We also used microarrays that allow the agnostic genome-wide screening of DNAm changes with a low technical variation [59]. In addition, the multi-center pan-European nature makes the results likely generalizable to multiple populations. However, some limitations of this study must be acknowledged. First, the sample size of our study is modest in comparison to previous EWAS, not allowing us to detect DNAm changes with small effects. However, the prevalence of children with moderate to severe asthma is generally low, making this a unique cohort. Second, focusing on this specific phenotype of moderate-to-severe pediatric asthma could limit the generalizability of the results to other asthma phenotypes. Third, we have not included an independent population to replicate our findings, but we assessed cross-tissue validation in nasal samples. Fourth, although we assessed DNAm in whole blood and nasal samples, other asthma-relevant tissues remained unexplored. Fifth, although we adopted the standard approach of adjusting by cell heterogeneity, we acknowledge that this could have reduced the statistical power to detect DNAm changes related to eosinophilic or Th2 asthma. Sixth, although we addressed any potential bias in our results related to age and sex, we have not recorded sex hormone levels or the age of puberty onset to better classify the patients in sensitive and stratified analyses.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we reported novel associations of epigenetic markers in whole blood associated with FeNO and BDR in children with moderate-to-severe asthma. These markers were enriched in asthma-related pathways, such as aging, smoking, and inflammatory and allergic responses. Furthermore, these findings provide new insights into potential epigenetic biomarkers of asthma that could be used as predictors of prognosis or treatment response.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines11030676/s1, Table S1: Clinical and demographic characteristics of the individuals with methylation measured in nasal samples; Table S2: Summary table of the quality control of methylation data; Table S3: Sensitivity analysis for the main EWAS findings; Table S4: Evaluation of the effect of CpGs in nasal epithelial cells; Table S5: Summary results of sensitivity analyses stratifying by sex and age; Table S6: Summary results of the gene-set enrichment analysis for the EWAS of BDR; Figure S1: Principal component regression analysis plot of blood samples; Figure S2: Principal component regression analysis plot of nasal samples; Figure S3: CpG-set enrichment analysis plot for the top 100 CpGs associated with BDR. Supplementary SI: SysPharmPediA consortium members (authors list); Supplementary SII: Acknowledgements.

Author Contributions

O.S.-P., P.C.-E., J.K.-M., J.V., C.A., A.D.K., U.P., A.H.M.-v.d.Z. and M.P.-Y. were involved in the study conceptualization; M.M.-A., J.P.-G., E.H.-L., C.R.-B., M.G., A.H.N., A.A.T., S.B., E.V., M.I.A.-A., S.H. (Susanne Harner), S.H. (Simone Hashimoto), A.M.H., J.C.V., S.J.H.V., V.B., N.K. and J.V. in the data curation; M.M.-A., J.P.-G., E.H.-L. and M.P.-Y. in the formal analysis; O.S.-P., J.V., A.D.K., U.P., M.K., A.H.M.-v.d.Z. and M.P.-Y. in the funding acquisition; M.M.-A., J.P.-G., E.H.-L., M.G., A.H.N., A.A.T., S.H. (Susanne Harner), M.I.A.-A., S.H. (Simone Hashimoto), S.J.H.V., V.B., M.K., A.H.M.-v.d.Z. and M.P.-Y. in the investigation; M.M.-A., J.P.-G., E.H.-L. and M.P.-Y. in the methodology; A.H.N., A.A.T., C.W., M.I.A.-A., S.H. (Simone Hashimoto), H.B.-D., A.H.M.-v.d.Z. and M.P.-Y. in the project administration; M.P.-Y. in the supervision; and M.M.-A. and J.P.-G. in writing the original draft. M.M.-A. and J.P.-G. contributed equally to this work and should be considered joint first author. The SysPharmPediA consortium authors are listed in the Supplementary SI under the header “SysPharmPediA members”. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN), grant PID2020-116274RB-I00 awarded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. The SysPharmPediA consortium was supported by ZonMW [project No. 9003035001], the Ministry of Education, Science, and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia [contract No. C330-16-500106]; the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [project No. FKZ 031L0088]; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through Strategic Action for Health Research (AES) and European Community (EC) within the Active and Assisted Living (AAL) Program framework [award No. AC15/00015 and AC15/00058] under the frame of the ERACoSysMed JTC-1 Call. M.P.-Y. was supported by a grant from the Ramón y Cajal Program (RYC-2015-17205) by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Social Fund “ESF Investing in your future”. J.P.-G. was funded by the fellowship FPU19/02175 (Formación Profesorado Universitario Program) from the Spanish Ministry of Universities. E.H.-L. was funded by fellowship PRE2018-083837 from MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Social Fund “Investing in your future”. M.P.-Y. and J.V. were also supported by CIBER—Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—(CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Unión Europea—European Regional Development Fund (CB06/06/1088). U.P., V.B., and M.G. were funded by Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P3-0427). M.I.A.-A. was funded by the Egyptian Government Ph.D. Scholarships. The STOPPA study was funded by the Swedish Research Council project grant 2018-02640 and the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Research Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committees of participating institutions: University Regensburg, Germany (18-1034-101); Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Basque Country, Spain [PI2015075 (SO)]; Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, The Netherlands (NL55788.041.15); National Medical Ethics Committee, Slovenia (0120-569/2017/4); and Ethical Regional Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden (Dnr 2010/1336-31/3 and 2019-00546).

Informed Consent Statement

All parents and participants provided signed written consent and agreed to participate in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings and conclusions of this study are reported and available in the main text and/or supplementary material of this article. For clinical and other omics data generated within the SysPharmPediA study, the authors will make these data available upon specific requests subject to the requestor obtaining ethical, research, data access, and collaboration approvals from the SysPharmPediA study management board. Requests can be sent to mdelpino@ull.edu.es and a.h.maitland@amsterdamumc.nl.

Acknowledgments

All authors acknowledge the children and their parents for participating in the SysPharmPediA study. The SysPharmPediA is a consortium effort, and we wish to acknowledge the help and expertise of the individuals and groups involved in the SysPharmPediA consortium whose names are provided in the Supplementary SII.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Over the past three years, J.C.V. has acted as a consultant for KNMP, Mentis, Red Bull, Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical, and Toast! S.H. (Simone Hashimoto), P.B., A.A.T., S.H. (Susanne Harner), S.B., C.W., A.M.H., C.A., P.C.-E., J.K.-M., O.S.-P., A.D.K., E.V., V.B., N.K., J.V., H.B.-D., M.M.-A., and C.R.-B. have no conflicts of interest to disclose. M.P.-Y. reports a grant from GlaxoSmithKline Spain, outside of the scope of the submitted work. In the last few years, M.K. also received payment for consultancy to Sanofi, Novartis, Bionorica, and Bencard and fees for lectures from ERS, EAACI, ATS, Novartis, Chiesi, Glaxo, Sanofi, Nutricia, Hipp, and Allergopharma. He is part of a patent “Method for testing a subject thought to have or to be predisposed to asthma”, European patent application 5 EP07301135.5. A.H.M.-v.d.Z. received unrestricted research grants from Vertex and Boehringer Ingelheim, received consulting fees (paid to institution) from Astra Zeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, and received honoraria (paid to institution) for lectures by GSK. A.H.M.-v.d.Z. is the PI of a P4O2 (Precision Medicine for more Oxygen) public–private partnership sponsored by Health Holland involving many private partners who contribute in cash and/or in-kind (Partners in the Precision Medicine for more Oxygen (P4O2)) consortium are the Amsterdam UMC, Leiden University Medical Center, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht University, UMC Groningen, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, TNO, Aparito, Boehringer Ingelheim, Breathomix, Clear, Danone Nutricia Research, Fluidda, MonitAir, Ncardia, Ortec Logiqcare, Philips, Proefdiervrij, Quantib-U, RespiQ, Roche, Smartfish, SODAQ, Thirona, TopMD, Lung Alliance Netherlands (LAN) and the Lung Foundation Netherlands (Longfonds). The consortium is additionally funded by the PPP Allowance made available by Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (LSHM20104; LSHM20068), to stimulate public–private partnerships and by Novartis), and she is the president of the federation of innovative drug research in the Netherlands (FIGON) (unpaid) and President of the European Association of Systems Medicine (EASYM). A.H.M.-v.d.Z. also participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Chair of DSMB SOS BPD study (unpaid) and Advisory board member CHAMP study (unpaid).

References

  1. Masoli, M.; Fabian, D.; Holt, S.; Beasley, R. The Global Burden of Asthma: Executive Summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee Report. Allergy 2004, 59, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention; Global Initiative for Asthma: Fontana, WI, USA, 2022.
  3. Licari, A.; Brambilla, I.; Marseglia, A.; De Filippo, M.; Paganelli, V.; Marseglia, L.L. Difficult vs. Severe Asthma: Definition and Limits of Asthma Control in the Pediatric Population. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 1, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sordillo, J.E.; Kelly, R.S.; Lutz, S.M.; Lasky-Su, J.; Wu, A.C. Pharmacogenetics of Bronchodilator Response: Future Directions. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burchard, E.G.; Avila, P.C.; Nazario, S.; Casal, J.; Torres, A.; Rodriguez-Santana, J.R.; Toscano, M.; Sylvia, J.S.; Alioto, M.E.; Salazar, M.; et al. Lower Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Puerto Rican than in Mexican Subjects with Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 169, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lund, M.B.; Kongerud, J.; Nystad, W.; Boe, J.; Harris, J.R. Genetic and Environmental Effects on Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Airway Responsiveness in a Population-Based Sample of Twins. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hernandez-Pacheco, N.; Pino-Yanes, M.; Flores, C. Genomic Predictors of Asthma Phenotypes and Treatment Response. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ober, C. Asthma Genetics in the Post-GWAS Era. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016, 13 (Suppl. 1), S85–S90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cardenas, A.; Sordillo, J.E.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Chung, W.; Liang, L.; Coull, B.A.; Hivert, M.F.; Lai, P.S.; Forno, E.; Celedón, J.C.; et al. The Nasal Methylome as a Biomarker of Asthma and Airway Inflammation in Children. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Edris, A.; den Dekker, H.T.; Melén, E.; Lahousse, L. Epigenome-Wide Association Studies in Asthma: A Systematic Review. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2019, 49, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Breton, C.V.; Byun, H.M.; Wang, X.; Salam, M.T.; Siegmund, K.; Gilliland, F.D. DNA Methylation in the Arginase-Nitric Oxide Synthase Pathway Is Associated with Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Children with Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ji, N.; Fang, M.; Baptista, A.; Cepeda, C.; Greenberg, M.; Mincey, I.C.; Ohman-Strickland, P.; Haynes, F.; Fiedler, N.; Kipen, H.M.; et al. Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Changes in Exhaled Nitric Oxide and DNA Methylation in Arginase and Nitric Oxide Synthase in Children with Asthma. Environ. Health 2021, 20, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Abdel-Aziz, M.I.; Neerincx, A.H.; Vijverberg, S.J.H.; Hashimoto, S.; Brinkman, P.; Gorenjak, M.; Toncheva, A.A.; Harner, S.; Brandstetter, S.; Wolff, C.; et al. A System Pharmacology Multi-Omics Approach toward Uncontrolled Pediatric Asthma. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2009, 51, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miller, M.R.; Hankinson, J.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Crapo, R.; Enright, P.; Van Der Grinten, C.P.M.; Gustafsson, P.; et al. Standardisation of Spirometry. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 171, 912–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Xu, Z.; Niu, L.; Li, L.; Taylor, J.A. ENmix: A Novel Background Correction Method for Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Available online: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 10 May 2022).
  19. Niu, L.; Xu, Z.; Taylor, J.A. RCP: A Novel Probe Design Bias Correction Method for Illumina Methylation BeadChip. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2659–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xu, Z.; Langie, S.A.S.; De Boever, P.; Taylor, J.A.; Niu, L. RELIC: A Novel Dye-Bias Correction Method for Illumina Methylation BeadChip. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Heiss, J.A.; Just, A.C. Identifying Mislabeled and Contaminated DNA Methylation Microarray Data: An Extended Quality Control Toolset with Examples from GEO. Clin. Epigenetics 2018, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pidsley, R.; Zotenko, E.; Peters, T.J.; Lawrence, M.G.; Risbridger, G.P.; Molloy, P.; Van Djik, S.; Muhlhausler, B.; Stirzaker, C.; Clark, S.J. Critical Evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip Microarray for Whole-Genome DNA Methylation Profiling. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wu, M.C.; Kuan, P.F. A Guide to Illumina BeadChip Data Analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1708, 303–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rahmani, E.; Zaitlen, N.; Baran, Y.; Eng, C.; Hu, D.; Galanter, J.; Oh, S.; Burchard, E.G.; Eskin, E.; Zou, J.; et al. Sparse PCA Corrects for Cell Type Heterogeneity in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 443–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. Limma Powers Differential Expression Analyses for RNA-Sequencing and Microarray Studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mansell, G.; Gorrie-Stone, T.J.; Bao, Y.; Kumari, M.; Schalkwyk, L.S.; Mill, J.; Hannon, E. Guidance for DNA Methylation Studies: Statistical Insights from the Illumina EPIC Array. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hansen, K.D. IlluminaHumanMethylationEPICanno.Ilm10b4.Hg19: Annotation for Illumina’s EPIC Methylation Arrays. R Packag. Version 0.6.0 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. McLean, C.Y.; Bristor, D.; Hiller, M.; Clarke, S.L.; Schaar, B.T.; Lowe, C.B.; Wenger, A.M.; Bejerano, G. GREAT Improves Functional Interpretation of Cis-Regulatory Regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pedersen, B.S.; Schwartz, D.A.; Yang, I.V.; Kechris, K.J. Comb-p: Software for Combining, Analyzing, Grouping and Correcting Spatially Correlated P-Values. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2986–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Peters, T.J.; Buckley, M.J.; Statham, A.L.; Pidsley, R.; Samaras, K.; Lord, R.V.; Clark, S.J.; Molloy, P.L. De Novo Identification of Differentially Methylated Regions in the Human Genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 2015, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Xiong, Z.; Yang, F.; Li, M.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, G.; Li, Z.; Zheng, X.; Zou, D.; Zong, W.; et al. EWAS Open Platform: Integrated Data, Knowledge and Toolkit for Epigenome-Wide Association Study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D1004–D1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuleshov, M.V.; Jones, M.R.; Rouillard, A.D.; Fernandez, N.F.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Koplev, S.; Jenkins, S.L.; Jagodnik, K.M.; Lachmann, A.; et al. Enrichr: A Comprehensive Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Web Server 2016 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W90–W97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chowdhury, N.U.; Guntur, V.P.; Newcomb, D.C.; Wechsler, M.E. Sex and Gender in Asthma. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2021, 30, 210067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jenkins, C.R.; Boulet, L.P.; Lavoie, K.L.; Raherison-Semjen, C.; Singh, D. Personalized Treatment of Asthma: The Importance of Sex and Gender Differences. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2022, 10, 963–971.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nolin, J.D.; Lai, Y.; Ogden, H.L.; Manicone, A.M.; Murphy, R.C.; An, D.; Frevert, C.W.; Ghomashchi, F.; Naika, G.S.; Gelb, M.H.; et al. Secreted PLA2 Group X Orchestrates Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses to Inhaled Allergen. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e94929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hallstrand, T.S.; Chi, E.Y.; Singer, A.G.; Gelb, M.H.; Henderson, W.R. Secreted Phospholipase A 2 Group X Overexpression in Asthma and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 176, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Rouault, M.; Le Calvez, C.; Boilard, E.; Surrel, F.; Singer, A.; Ghomashchi, F.; Bezzine, S.; Scarzello, S.; Bollinger, J.; Gelb, M.H.; et al. Recombinant Production and Properties of Binding of the Full Set of Mouse Secreted Phospholipases A 2 to the Mouse M-Type Receptor. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 1647–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Revez, J.N.M.A. The Role of the Interleukin-6 Pathway in Asthma. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rincon, M.; Irvin, C.G. Role of IL-6 in Asthma and Other Inflammatory Pulmonary Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ilmarinen, P.; Tuomisto, L.E.; Niemela, O.; Danielsson, J.; Naanpaa, J.; Kankaanranta, T.; Kankaanranta, H. Comorbidities and Elevated IL-6 Associate with Negative Outcome in Adult-Onset Asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 48, 1052–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Silverman, E.S.; De Sanctis, G.T.; Boyce, J.; Maclean, J.A.; Jiao, A.; Green, F.H.Y.; Grasemann, H.; Faunce, D.; Fitzmaurice, G.; Shi, G.P.; et al. The Transcription Factor Early Growth-Response Factor 1 Modulates Tumor Necrosis Factor- α, Immunoglobulin E, and Airway Responsiveness in Mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 163, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baron, V.T.; Pio, R.; Jia, Z.; Mercola, D. Early Growth Response 3 Regulates Genes of Inflammation and Directly Activates IL6 and IL8 Expression in Prostate Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 112, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Omodho, B.; Miao, T.; Symonds, A.L.J.; Singh, R.; Li, S.; Wang, P. Transcription Factors Early Growth Response Gene (Egr) 2 and 3 Control Inflammatory Responses of Tolerant T Cells. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2018, 6, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Jakiela, B.; Soja, J.; Sladek, K.; Przybyszowski, M.; Plutecka, H.; Gielicz, A.; Licholai, S.; Aab, A.; Rebane, A.; Bochenek, G. Bronchial Epithelial Cell Transcriptome Shows Endotype Heterogeneity of Asthma in Patients with NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhu, X.; Chen, D.; Liu, Y.; Yu, J.; Qiao, L.; Lin, S.; Chen, D.; Zhong, G.; Lu, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Long Noncoding RNA HOXA-AS3 Integrates NF-ΚB Signaling To Regulate Endothelium Inflammation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2019, 39, e00139-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Edwards, M.R.; Bartlett, N.W.; Clarke, D.; Birrell, M.; Belvisi, M.; Johnston, S.L. Targeting the NF-KappaB Pathway in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 121, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kambayashi, T.; Deshpande, D.A. The Role of Diacylglycerol Kinases in Allergic Airway Disease. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2020, 51, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Den Dekker, H.T.; Burrows, K.; Felix, J.F.; Salas, L.A.; Nedeljkovic, I.; Yao, J.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Ruiz-Arenas, C.; Amin, N.; Bustamante, M.; et al. Newborn DNA-Methylation, Childhood Lung Function, and the Risks of Asthma and COPD across the Life Course. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1801795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Herrera-Luis, E.; Li, A.; Mak, A.C.Y.; Perez-Garcia, J.; Elhawary, J.R.; Oh, S.S.; Hu, D.; Eng, C.; Keys, K.L.; Huntsman, S.; et al. Epigenome-wide Association Study of Lung Function in Latino Children and Youth with Asthma. Clin. Epigenetics 2022, 14, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liao, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Ning, S.; Su, D. Construction of Asthma Related Competing Endogenous RNA Network Revealed Novel Long Non-Coding RNAs and Potential New Drugs. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Howrylak, J.A.; Moll, M.; Weiss, S.T.; Raby, B.A.; Wu, W.; Xing, E.P. Gene Expression Profiling of Asthma Phenotypes Demonstrates Molecular Signatures of Atopy and Asthma Control. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zaffini, R.; Gotte, G.; Menegazzi, M. Asthma and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition: A New Therapeutic Approach. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Li, M.; Wetzel-Strong, S.E.; Hua, X.; Tilley, S.L.; Oswald, E.; Krummel, M.F.; Caron, K.M. Deficiency of RAMP1 Attenuates Antigen-Induced Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kytikova, O.Y.; Perelman, J.M.; Novgorodtseva, T.P.; Denisenko, Y.K.; Kolosov, V.P.; Antonyuk, M.V.; Gvozdenko, T.A.; Hsun, T.; Huang, W. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors as a Therapeutic Target in Asthma. PPAR Res. 2020, 2020, 8906968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Principe, S.; Porsbjerg, C.; Bolm Ditlev, S.; Kjærsgaard Klein, D.; Golebski, K.; Dyhre-Petersen, N.; van Dijk, Y.E.; van Bragt, J.J.M.H.; Dankelman, L.L.H.; Dahlen, S.E.; et al. Treating Severe Asthma: Targeting the IL-5 Pathway. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2021, 51, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, L.C. Immunoglobulin E Receptor Signaling and Asthma. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 32891–32897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Peng, C.; Cardenas, A.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Hivert, M.F.; Gold, D.R.; Platts-Mills, T.A.; Lin, X.; Oken, E.; Avila, L.; Celedón, J.C.; et al. Epigenetic Age Acceleration Is Associated with Allergy and Asthma in Children in Project Viva. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143, 2263–2270.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Stapleton, M.; Howard-Thompson, A.; George, C.; Hoover, R.M.; Self, T.H. Smoking and Asthma. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2011, 24, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Teh, A.L.; Pan, H.; Lin, X.; Lim, Y.I.; Patro, C.P.K.; Cheong, C.Y.; Gong, M.; MacIsaac, J.L.; Kwoh, C.K.; Meaney, M.J.; et al. Comparison of Methyl-Capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K Methylation Array for Methylome Analysis in Clinical Samples. Epigenetics 2016, 11, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 11 00676 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Q-Q plot of p-values of the EWAS of BDR. (B) Manhattan plot for the EWAS of BDR. This figure illustrates the position of each CpG arranged by chromosomal location (X-axis) and the level of statistical significance measured by the negative logarithm of the corresponding p-value (Y-axis). The blue and red lines represent the FDR < 0.1 and genome-wide thresholds, respectively. (C) Q-Q plot of p-values of the EWAS of FeNO. (D) Manhattan plot for the EWAS of FeNO.
Figure 1. (A) Q-Q plot of p-values of the EWAS of BDR. (B) Manhattan plot for the EWAS of BDR. This figure illustrates the position of each CpG arranged by chromosomal location (X-axis) and the level of statistical significance measured by the negative logarithm of the corresponding p-value (Y-axis). The blue and red lines represent the FDR < 0.1 and genome-wide thresholds, respectively. (C) Q-Q plot of p-values of the EWAS of FeNO. (D) Manhattan plot for the EWAS of FeNO.
Biomedicines 11 00676 g001
Biomedicines 11 00676 g002 550
Figure 2. Summary plot of the trait-enrichment analysis for the top 100 CpGs associated with FeNO. p-values are displayed on the X-axis, and traits on the Y-axis. The color scale represents the significance of the association. The point size indicates the number of CpGs supporting the enrichment.
Figure 2. Summary plot of the trait-enrichment analysis for the top 100 CpGs associated with FeNO. p-values are displayed on the X-axis, and traits on the Y-axis. The color scale represents the significance of the association. The point size indicates the number of CpGs supporting the enrichment.
Biomedicines 11 00676 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population.
CharacteristicsnEWAS of BDRnEWAS of FeNO
Sex (male)12175 (62)10967 (61.5)
Age (years)12112.0 (9.8−14.0)10912.1 (9.8−14.0)
Ancestry121 109
African 4 (3.3) 2 (1.9)
Asian 2 (1.7) 1 (0.9)
European 96 (79.3) 88 (80.7)
Latin 9 (7.4) 8 (7.3)
Mixed/Other 10 (8.3) 10 (9.2)
Body mass index (z-score)1210.5 (−0.3−4.0)1080.4 (-0.4−1.3)
Uncontrolled asthma12177 (63.6)10971 (65.1)
pre-FEV1 (predicted %)12193.6 (82.5−103.2)10895.3 (82.7−103.2)
pre-FVC (predicted %)12199.4 (91.2−108.1)108100.3 (91.0−107.6)
BDR (%)1214.2 (0.6−11.3)1084.2 (0.6−10.5)
FeNO (ppb)12016.0 (9.0−38.0)10916.0 (9.0−41.0)
SABAs10394 (91.3)9284 (91.3)
LABAs10396 (93.2)9287 (94.6)
ICS103103 (100)9292 (100)
LTRA10317 (16.5)9215 (16.3)
OCS1032 (1.9)921 (1.09)
Biological therapy †1039 (8.7)928 (8.7)
Categorical variables are described as counts (percentage), and continuous variables as median (interquartile range). † Biological therapy: Mepolizumab or Omalizumab intake. Abbreviations: FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second; FVC: forced vital capacity; BDR: Bronchodilator drug response; FeNO: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide; SABA: Short-Acting Beta-Agonists; LABAs: Long-Acting Beta-Agonists; ICS: Inhaled corticosteroids; LTRA: Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists; OCS: Oral corticosteroids.
Table
Table 2. Summary results of the epigenome-wide association studies.
Table 2. Summary results of the epigenome-wide association studies.
CpGChrPosition †GeneRelative Position *CoefSEp-ValueFDR
Bronchodilator drug response
cg2620325610111756055ADD3-AS1First intron−0.0200.0041.85 × 10−70.099
cg149853211420823915PARP2Tenth exon−0.0100.0023.71 × 10−70.099
cg069751209139606856FAM69B165 bp upstream−0.0340.0063.86 × 10−70.099
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide
cg128352564110651671PLA2G12A439 bp upstream−0.0150.0022.53 × 10−90.002
cg196445802119166676C21orf91Fourth intron0.0060.0011.29 × 10−70.050
† Position based on GRCh37/hg19 build. * Relative position to the transcription start sites of each gene. Abbreviations. Chr: chromosome; Coef: Coefficient expressed as log2(fold-change); SE: Standard error; FDR: False discovery rate.
Table
Table 3. Differentially methylated regions associated with BDR and FeNO.
Table 3. Differentially methylated regions associated with BDR and FeNO.
ChrStart †End †GeneRelative Position *N° of CpGsCoefficientFDR
Bronchodilator drug response
5126408755126409453C5orf63Promoter, first exon, and intron11−0.0242.80 × 10−7
1175978137598150PPFIBP2Gene body (alternative transcripts)5−0.0119.24 × 10−7
2238767350238767779RAMP1671 bp upstream4−0.0222.67 × 10−6
63165073431650849LY6G5CGene body (alternative transcripts)3−0.0238.96 × 10−6
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide
194699838246999839PPP5D1Third intron16−0.0041.48 × 10−18
82256092122561950EGR310,622 bp upstream7−0.0053.15 × 10−17
157601612876016334ODF3L1Promoter and first exon6−0.0036.66 × 10−14
72718655327187559HOXA6Promoter and gene body110.0052.01 × 10−13
72718327327184736HOXA-AS3First intron330.0042.53 × 10−13
72717024027170831HOXA4Promoter and first exon10−0.0061.00 × 10−10
195774211157742443AURKCPromoter and first exon10−0.0083.95 × 10−10
7100844059100844444MOGAT3First exon7−0.0024.21 × 10−10
72719818827198428HOXA71857 bp upstream30.0051.37 × 10−9
124158177441582136PDZRN4Promoter and first exon6−0.0041.37 × 10−9
77908399679084165MAGI2-AS3Second intron70.0032.59 × 10−9
9125137543125137593PTGS1Second intron30.0037.61 × 10−9
† Position based on GRCh37/hg19 build. * Relative position to the transcription start sites. Abbreviations. Chr: Chromosome; BDR: bronchodilator drug response; FeNO: fractional exhaled nitric oxide.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martin-Almeida, M.; Perez-Garcia, J.; Herrera-Luis, E.; Rosa-Baez, C.; Gorenjak, M.; Neerincx, A.H.; Sardón-Prado, O.; Toncheva, A.A.; Harner, S.; Wolff, C.; et al. Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of the Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Bronchodilator Drug Response in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Asthma. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030676

AMA Style

Martin-Almeida M, Perez-Garcia J, Herrera-Luis E, Rosa-Baez C, Gorenjak M, Neerincx AH, Sardón-Prado O, Toncheva AA, Harner S, Wolff C, et al. Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of the Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Bronchodilator Drug Response in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Asthma. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(3):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martin-Almeida, Mario, Javier Perez-Garcia, Esther Herrera-Luis, Carlos Rosa-Baez, Mario Gorenjak, Anne H. Neerincx, Olaia Sardón-Prado, Antoaneta A. Toncheva, Susanne Harner, Christine Wolff, and et al. 2023. "Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of the Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Bronchodilator Drug Response in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Asthma" Biomedicines 11, no. 3: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030676

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop