Next Article in Journal
Biological Sensing of Nitric Oxide in Macrophages and Atherosclerosis Using a Ruthenium-Based Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
MGMT Promoter Methylation as a Prognostic Factor in Primary Glioblastoma: A Single-Institution Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Intracellular Habitation of Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms and Prospects for Antimicrobial Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Escalating a Biological Dose of Radiation in the Target Volume Applying Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Head and Neck Region Tumours
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Approach to Imaging and Rapid Microbiome Identification for Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 1806; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081806
by Ewelina Maślak 1,2, Wioletta Miśta 3, Michał Złoch 1, Dominika Błońska 1,2, Paweł Pomastowski 1, Fernanda Monedeiro 1, Bogusław Buszewski 1,2, Jolanta Mrochem-Kwarciak 4, Katarzyna Bojarska 4 and Dorota Gabryś 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 1806; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081806
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Cancer Biology and Therapeutics in Poland)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Novel and interesting study.

The introduction is quite clear, not so clear the aim of the study. I believe that the main endpoint should be evaluate if there is any change in the microbiota composition during the different phases of the RT treatment. In the intro it seems that actually the main endpoint is only to evaluate the microbiota before RT treatment which is not so interesting, and the secondary endpoint is the evaluation of possible microbiota change during and after the treatment.

Would have been interesting to know which species are those who showed the huge increase/decrease during the treatment

Limitations of the study should be highlighted and declared ad the end of the discussion. For example:

-        Limited sample size

-        some patients took hormonal therapy and other not. The ADT might influence the microbiota.

-        Two different types of RT: line accelerator and cyber knife

-        Different Gy doses

-        etc

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is devoted to an urgent topic, the search for potential predictors associated with the effectiveness of radiotherapy. However, the discussion and conclusion to the article requires careful processing. It is necessary to clearly identify the identified changes taking into account changes in biochemical markers and PSA content.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I read the new version and the authors replied to my concerns.

 

Back to TopTop