Next Article in Journal
Potential Antioxidant Multitherapy against Complications Occurring in Sepsis
Next Article in Special Issue
Heat Accumulation in Implant Inter-Osteotomy Areas—An Experimental In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Growth Arrest of Alveolar Cells in Response to Cytokines from Spike S1-Activated Macrophages: Role of IFN-γ
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Two-Dimensional Entropy Measures to Detect the Radiographic Signs of Tooth Resorption and Hypercementosis in an Equine Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of the Efficacy of CPP-ACP Remineralizing Mousse in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralized Teeth Using Polarized Raman and Scanning Electron Microscopy—An In Vitro Study

Biomedicines 2022, 10(12), 3086; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123086
by Inês Cardoso-Martins 1,*, Sofia Pessanha 2, Ana Coelho 1, Sofia Arantes-Oliveira 1 and Paula F. Marques 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2022, 10(12), 3086; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123086
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 27 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Biomaterials and Technologies in Dentistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review of the manuscript entitled ‘Evaluation of the efficacy of CPP-ACP remineralizing mousse in Molar-Incisor hypomineralized teeth using polarized Raman and Scanning Electron Microscopy – an in vitro study’ by I. Cardoso-Martins et al. In this paper, the authors evaluate the efficacy of CPP-ACP tooth mousse in remineralizing MIH affected enamel using polarized Raman microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

The research is interesting and the manuscript could be accepted after taking into account the minor comments. 

1.  I advise to use ‘Raman spectroscopy results’, ‘Raman spectroscopy analysis’, rather than ‘Raman results’, ‘Raman analysis’, also in Fig. 1.

2.     It is written ‘spectra were recorded without polarization’, however these results are not described.

           

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors, 

Attached please find the PDF with the comments.

Good work

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment"

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for providing the revised version of your work. I inform you that the modifications were correctly performed, therefore the manuscript is now suitable for publication.
Thank you for your submission to Biomedicines. 

Back to TopTop