Next Article in Journal
Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Quality of Care Evaluation in Malaysia Using SERVQUAL and Facebook
Next Article in Special Issue
Cost and Effectiveness of Long-Term Care Following Integrated Discharge Planning: A Prospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Survey on Medication Safety in Korean Older Adults: An Analysis of an Ageing Society
Previous Article in Special Issue
Psychometric Properties of the Taiwanese Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Unilateral Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Cancer Metastasis Diagnosed with Electromyography: A Case Report

Healthcare 2021, 9(10), 1370; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101370
by Chan-Hee Park 1, Eunhee Park 2,3 and Tae-Du Jung 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Healthcare 2021, 9(10), 1370; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101370
Submission received: 26 August 2021 / Revised: 4 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This case report is well written and well described, so this referee is satisfied.

Author Response

Thank you for your kind review of my case report.

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. The authors do not define the objective of the work. They only report that they "will describe unilateral CES diagnosed with electromyography (EMG) which is easy to be confused with radiculopathy".
  2. What is this information in the middle of the article (end of page 4 and the beggining of page 5) ????

    ""Materials and Methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate and build on the published results. Please note that the publication of your man-uscript implicates that you must make all materials, data, computer code, and protocols
    associated with the publication available to readers. Please disclose at the submission stage any restrictions on the availability of materials or information. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly de-scribed and appropriately cited. ""

  3. Methods and discussion lack depth and granularity. And there is no discussion about EMG signals for CES.
  4. Given that this is a case study, the conclusion is fragile.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for an interesting case report.

Author Response

Thank you for your kind review of my case report.

Reviewer 4 Report

This is an interesting case report

Author Response

Thank you for your kind review of my case report.

Back to TopTop