Next Article in Journal
The Asymptotic Expansion of a Function Introduced by L.L. Karasheva
Previous Article in Journal
Stochastic Analysis of the Time Continuum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Contour Method of a Trigonometric Integral by Prudnikov et al.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J1P3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2021, 9(12), 1453; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121453
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 18 June 2021 / Accepted: 18 June 2021 / Published: 21 June 2021

Abstract

:
In this present work we derive, evaluate and produce a table of definite integrals involving logarithmic and exponential functions. Some of the closed form solutions derived are expressed in terms of elementary or transcendental functions. A substantial part of this work is new.

1. Significance Statement

The Fourier cosine and Mellin transforms are used in a wide range of fields in science and engineering. Some of these applications are in software engineering [1], digital processing for the purposes of pattern recognition and Wiener filtering [2], distribution of sums of independent random variables [3], application to range radar profiles of naval vessels [4], gravity effect of a buried sphere and two-dimensional horizontal circular cylinder [5], and stress distribution in an infinite wedge [6].
The usage of these transforms is vast and covers all aspects of everyday life. In this present work, we aim to expand on the current compendium of tables of these transforms available to researchers in order to provide additional formula to AI in new research where these new formula are applicable. We also provide formal derivations of existing formula, which is a useful exercise for determining if these formula are correct. We derive new Fourier cosine and Mellin transforms and summarize these derivations in a table for easy perusal by interested readers and researchers.

2. Introduction

We apply the simultaneous contour integral method [7] to an integral in Prudnikov et al. and use it to derive closed forms for a Fourier cosine transform, Mellin transform, provide formal derivations for integrals in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik originally derived by Erdéyli et al. and Bierens de Haan, and present a table of definite integrals of results new and known.
In this paper, we derive the definite integral given by
0 e a x e i m x ( log ( c ) + i x ) k + e i m x ( log ( c ) i x ) k e a x + 1 2 d x
and used it to achieve several objectives. We derive formula for the Mellin transform, Fourier cosine, and sine transform. We present formal derivations for some definite integrals in [8]. We also summarize our derivations with a table of transforms not listed in current literature. The Mellin transform is used in almost all areas of science and engineering, such as statistics and analysis of different kinds of geophysical data to name a few. Regarding our definite integral, the constants a , k , c , and m in Equation (1) are general complex numbers subject to the restrictions given below. The derivations follow the method used by us in [7]. The generalized Cauchy’s integral formula is given by
y k k ! = 1 2 π i C e w y w k + 1 d w
where C is in general an open contour in the complex plane where the bilinear concomitant [7] has the same value at the end points of the contour. This method involves using a form of Equation (2) then multiplying both sides by a function and then takes a definite integral of both sides. This yields a definite integral in terms of a contour integral. Then, we multiply both sides of Equation (2) by another function and take the infinite sum of both sides such that the contour integral of both equations are the same.

2.1. Definite Integral of the Contour Integral

Using the method in [7] involving Cauchy’s integral Equation (2), we replace y by log ( c ) + i x and multiply both sides by e m x i . Then, we derive a second equation by replacing x by x and adding, followed by multiplying both sides by e a x 2 e a x + 1 2 to get
0 e a x e i m x ( log ( c ) + i x ) k + e i m x ( log ( c ) i x ) k 4 k ! e a x + 1 2 d x = 1 2 π i 0 C e a x c w w k 1 cos ( x ( m + w ) ) e a x + 1 2 d w d x = 1 2 π i C 0 e a x c w w k 1 cos ( x ( m + w ) ) e a x + 1 2 d x d w = 1 2 π i C π c w w k 1 ( m + w ) csch π ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w
from Equation (2.5.34.7) in [9] where 0 < I m ( w + m a ) . The logarithmic function is given, for example, in Section 4.1 in [10]. We are able to switch the order of integration over w + m and x using Fubini’s theorem since the integrand is of bounded measure over the space C × [ 0 , ) .

2.2. The Lerch Function

We use Equation (1.11.3) in [11] where Φ ( z , s , v ) is the Lerch function, which is a generalization of the Hurwitz zeta and Polylogarithm functions. The Lerch function has a series representation given by
Φ ( z , s , v ) = n = 0 ( v + n ) s z n
where | z | < 1 , v 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , , and is continued analytically by its integral representation given by
Φ ( z , s , v ) = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e v t 1 z e t d t = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e ( v 1 ) t e t z d t
where R e ( v ) > 0 , and either | z | 1 , z 1 , R e ( s ) > 0 , or z = 1 , R e ( s ) > 1 .

2.3. Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral

2.3.1. Derivation of the First Contour Integral

In this section we will derive the contour integral given by
1 2 π i C π m c w w k 1 csch π ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w
Again, we use the method in [7]. Using Equation (2) replace y by π ( 2 y + 1 ) a + log ( c ) and multiply both sides by π m a 2 e π m ( 2 y + 1 ) a . Next, we take the infinite sum over y [ 0 , ) and simplify in terms of the Lerch function to get
2 k π k + 1 m 1 a k + 2 e π m a Φ e 2 m π a , k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π k ! = 1 2 π i y = 0 C π m c w w k 1 e π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) a a 2 d w = 1 2 π i C y = 0 π m c w w k 1 e π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) a a 2 d w = 1 2 π i C π m c w w k 1 csch π ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w
from (1.232.3) in [8] and I m ( m + w a ) > 0 for convergence of the sum.

2.3.2. Derivation of the Second Contour Integral

In this section we will derive the contour integral given by
1 2 π i C π c w w k csch π ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w
Again, we use the method in [7]. Using Equation (2), replace y by π ( 2 y + 1 ) a + log ( c ) and multiply both sides by π a 2 e π m ( 2 y + 1 ) a and simplify in terms of the Lerch function to get
2 k 1 π k 1 a k + 1 e π m a Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π ( k 1 ) ! = 1 2 π i y = 0 C π c w w k 1 e π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w = 1 2 π i C y = 0 π c w w k 1 e π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w = 1 2 π i C π c w w k csch π ( m + w ) a 2 a 2 d w
from (1.232.3) in [8] and I m ( m + w a ) > 0 for convergence of the sum.

3. Main Results

Definite Integral in Terms of the Lerch Function

Theorem 1.
k , c C , R e ( m / a ) 0 ,
0 e a x e i m x ( log ( c ) + i x ) k + e i m x ( log ( c ) i x ) k e a x + 1 2 d x = k ( 2 π ) k 1 a k + 1 e π m a Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π ( 2 π ) k + 1 m 1 a k + 2 e π m a Φ e 2 m π a , k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π
Proof. 
Since the right-hand side of Equation (3) is equal to the sum of the right-hand sides of Equations (7) and (9), we can equate the left-hand sides and simplify the factorials.  ☐

4. Derivation of a Fourier Cosine Transform

Theorem 2.
For all k , c C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 sech 2 a x 2 cos ( m x ) ( log ( c ) i x ) k + ( log ( c ) + i x ) k d x = 2 k + 1 π k 1 a k + 2 e π m a a k Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π + e 2 π m a a k Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π + 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , k , a log ( c ) + π 2 π
Proof. 
Use Equation (10) and form a second equation by replacing m by m and add to Equation (10) and simplify. Note we can derive the Fourier sine transform by taking the first partial derivative with respect to m of Equation (11).  ☐

4.1. Derivation of a Mellin Transform

Theorem 3.
For all k C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 x k + 1 sech 2 ( a x ) sin ( m x ) d x = 1 2 π k + 1 1 a k + 3 e π m 2 a sec π k 2 π m Φ e m π a , k 1 , 1 2 a ( k + 1 ) Φ e m π a , k , 1 2 + e π m a π m Φ e m π a , k 1 , 1 2 + a ( k + 1 ) Φ e m π a , k , 1 2
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) replace a by 2 a and set c = 1 and simplify the left-hand side.  ☐

4.2. Derivation of a Mellin Transform

Theorem 4.
For all k C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 x k sech 2 a x 2 cos ( m x ) d x = ( 2 π ) k 1 a k + 2 e π m a sec π k 2 a k Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , 1 2 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , k , 1 2 + e 2 π m a a k Φ e 2 m π a , 1 k , 1 2 + 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , k , 1 2
Proof. 
Use Equation (12) and take the first partial derivative with respect to m and simplify.  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.118 in [8]
Theorem 5.
For all m C ,
0 x sech 2 ( x ) sin ( m x ) d x = 1 4 π π m coth π m 2 2 csch π m 2
Proof. 
Use Equation (12) and set k = 0 , a = 1 and use entries (2) and (3) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to simplify.  ☐
Derivation of Entry 3.982.1 in [8]
Theorem 6.
For all m C ,
0 sech 2 a x 2 cos ( m x ) d x = 2 π m csch π m a a 2
Proof. 
Use Equation (13) and set k = 0 and use entries (1) and (2) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to simplify.  ☐

4.3. Derivation of an Integral with Combinations of Trigonometric and Rational Functions

Theorem 7.
For all c C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 sech 2 a x 2 cos ( m x ) c 2 + x 2 d x = e π m a 2 π a c 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , 1 , a c + π 2 π + a Φ e 2 m π a , 2 , a c + π 2 π + e 2 π m a a Φ e 2 m π a , 2 , a c + π 2 π 2 π m Φ e 2 m π a , 1 , a c + π 2 π
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) set k = 1 and replace c by e c and simplify.  ☐

4.4. Derivation of Logarithmic Functions and Powers

Theorem 8.
For all c C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 sech 2 a x 2 log c 2 + x 2 cos ( m x ) d x = e π m a a 2 2 e 2 π m a a Φ e 2 m π a , 1 , a c + π 2 π 2 π m Φ e 2 π m a , 0 , a c + π 2 π + 4 π m log 2 π a coth π m a + 1 Φ e 2 π m a , 0 , a c + π 2 π 2 a Φ e 2 m π a , 1 , a c + π 2 π
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) and take the first partial derivative with respect to k then set k = 0 and use entries (2) and (3) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to simplify.  ☐

5. A General Case

In this section, we will derive a formula for the general case for deriving equations in Table 4.376 in [8].
Theorem 9.
For all k , γ , β C , R e ( m / a ) = 0 ,
0 x k log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) ( ( 2 γ + 1 ) cosh ( m x ) β x sinh ( m x ) ) d x = 1 4 π k 1 a k + 3 e i π m 2 a sec π k 2 i π β 2 a ( k + 1 ) Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m π tan π k 2 Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 2 Φ e i π m a , k 1 , 1 2 + e i π m a 2 a ( k + 1 ) Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 2 Φ e i π m a , k 1 , 1 2 2 i π m log π a Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 + a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 ( k + 1 ) log π a + π ( k + 1 ) tan π k 2 + 2 a e i π m a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 ( k + 1 ) log π a + π ( k + 1 ) tan π k 2 + 2 a ( 2 γ + 1 ) 2 a k Φ e i π m a , 1 k , 1 2 + 2 i π m Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 2 a k e i π m a Φ e i π m a , 1 k , 1 2 2 i π m e i π m a Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 + i π m e i π m a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 + a Φ e i m π a , 1 k , 1 2 2 k log π a + π k tan π k 2 + 2 + a e i π m a Φ e i m π a , 1 k , 1 2 2 k log π a + π k tan π k 2 + 2
Proof. 
Use Equation (12) and first replace m by m i , multiply both sides by β i , and take the first partial derivative with respect to k to get
0 β x k + 1 log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) sinh ( m x ) d x = 1 4 i β π k + 1 1 a k + 3 e i π m 2 a sec π k 2 2 a ( k + 1 ) Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m π tan π k 2 Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 2 Φ e i π m a , k 1 , 1 2 + e i π m a 2 a ( k + 1 ) Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 2 Φ e i π m a , k 1 , 1 2 2 i π m log π a Φ e i m π a , k 1 , 1 2 + a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 ( k + 1 ) log π a + π ( k + 1 ) tan π k 2 + 2 a e i π m a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 ( k + 1 ) log π a + π ( k + 1 ) tan π k 2 + 2
Next, using Equation (13), we multiply both sides by 2 γ + 1 , replace m by m i then take the first partial derivative with respect to m to get
0 ( 2 γ + 1 ) x k log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) cosh ( m x ) d x = 1 4 ( 2 γ + 1 ) π k 1 a k + 2 e i π m 2 a sec π k 2 2 a k Φ e i π m a , 1 k , 1 2 + 2 i π m Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 2 a k e i π m a Φ e i π m a , 1 k , 1 2 2 i π m e i π m a Φ e i π m a , k , 1 2 i π m Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 + i π m e i π m a Φ e i m π a , k , 1 2 2 log π a + π tan π k 2 + a Φ e i m π a , 1 k , 1 2 2 k log π a + π k tan π k 2 + 2 + a e i π m a Φ e i m π a , 1 k , 1 2 2 k log π a + π k tan π k 2 + 2
Take the difference between Equations (19) and (20) and simplify.  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.376.2 in [8]
Using Equation (18), set a = m = β = 1 , replace k by μ and γ by μ / 2 , and simplify in terms of the Hurwitz zeta function (12.7) in [13] using entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to get
0 x μ log ( x ) sech ( x ) ( μ x tanh ( x ) + 1 ) d x = 2 μ π μ + 1 ζ μ , 1 4 ζ μ , 3 4 sec π μ 2
Derivation of Entry 4.376.3 in [8]
Using Equation (21) and simplifying in terms of the Bernoulli polynomials B μ ( x ) using Equation (12.11.17) in [13], we get
0 x μ log ( x ) sech ( x ) ( μ x tanh ( x ) + 1 ) d x = e i π μ 2 ( 2 π ) μ + 1 B μ + 1 3 4 μ + 1
Derivation of Entry 4.376.7 in [8]
Using Equation (18), replace β by a, k by 2 n , and γ by n and simplify using the Hurwitz zeta function (12.7) in [13] and entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to get
0 x 2 n log ( x ) sech ( a x ) ( a x tanh ( a x ) + 2 n + 1 ) d x = 4 n π 2 n + 1 1 a 2 n + 1 ζ 2 n , 1 4 ζ 2 n , 3 4 sec ( π n )
Derivation of Entry 4.376.8 in [8]
For this entry, we derive the solution which is continued analytically using the Hurwitz zeta function from Equation (9.521.1) in [8].
Theorem 10.
For all a , k C ,
0 x k log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) ( 2 a x tanh ( a x ) + 2 n + 1 ) d x = 4 k 1 a k + 1 ζ ( k ) Γ ( k ) 2 2 k 2 k log π a ( k 2 n ) 4 2 k 2 n + 4 k 2 k + k log ( 2 ) n log ( 4 ) 2 + π 2 k 2 k ( k 2 n ) tan π k 2 2 k 2 k ( 2 π ) k ( k 2 n ) sec π k 2 ζ ( 1 k )
Proof. 
Use Equation (13) and multiply both sides by ( 2 n + 1 ) and set m = 0 , then take the first partial derivative with respect to k, simplify using entry (2) in Table below (64:7) and entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to get
0 ( 2 n 1 ) x k log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) d x = 4 k ( 2 n + 1 ) 1 a k + 1 ζ ( k ) Γ ( k ) 2 2 k 2 k log π a + 2 k + k log ( 4 ) 2 π 2 k 2 k tan π k 2 + 2 k 2 k ( 2 π ) k sec π k 2 ζ ( 1 k )
Next, use Equation (13), take the first partial derivative with respect to a and set m = 0 and simplify using entry (2) in Table below (64:7) and entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12] to get
0 2 a x k + 1 log ( x ) tanh ( a x ) sech 2 ( a x ) d x = 1 a k + 1 4 k ζ ( k ) Γ ( k ) 2 2 k 2 k ( k + 1 ) log π a + 2 k + 2 k 2 k + k log ( 2 ) 2 + log ( 2 ) 2 + π 2 k 2 k ( k + 1 ) tan π k 2 2 k 2 k ( k + 1 ) π 2 k sec π k 2 ζ ( 1 k )
Next, add Equations (25) and (26) and simplify.  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.376.8 in [8]
Using Equation (24) and replace k by 2 n , and simplifying we get
0 x 2 n log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) ( 2 a x tanh ( a x ) + 2 n + 1 ) d x = 4 1 2 n 4 n 2 n 1 a 2 n + 1 ζ ( 2 n ) Γ ( 2 n ) , for n 0 1 a , for n = 0
Note the the formula quoted in [8] is in error.

5.1. Derivation of More Examples

Example 2

Using Equation (17) and setting m = π i , c = 1 , a = π , simplify to get
0 log x 2 + 1 ( π x tanh ( π x ) + 1 ) sech ( π x ) d x = 3 + π + log 81 Γ 3 4 4 64 Γ 1 4 4

5.2. Integral in Terms of the Polylogarithmic Function

In this section we will derive formula using the Polylogarithms L i k ( z ) given in Section (25:12) in [12]. Polylogarithms are also known as Jonquière’s functions (Ernest Jean Philippe Fauque de Jonquières, 1820–1901, French naval officer and mathematician), they appear in the Feynman diagrams of particle physics.
Theorem 11.
For all c , k , m C ,
0 ( c i x ) k + ( c + i x ) k sech 2 π x 2 c cos ( m x ) d x = 2 k + 1 c k + 1 e c m π k L i 1 k e 2 c m + e 2 c m k L i 1 k e 2 c m 2 c m L i k e 2 c m + 2 c m L i k e 2 c m
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) and replace a by π c and simplify using Equation (64:12:2) in [12].  ☐

5.3. Definite Integral in Terms of the Hurwitz Zeta Function

Theorem 12.
For all a , k , c C ,
0 sech a x 2 ( c i x ) k + ( c + i x ) k d x = 2 k + 2 π k + 1 1 a k + 1 2 k ζ k , a c + π 4 π 2 k ζ k , 1 2 a c + π 2 π + 1
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) and replace m by a i 2 and simplify using entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7).  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.373.1 in [8]
Using Equation (30) and taking the first partial derivative with respect to k and setting k = 0 simplifying using Equation (64:10:2) in [12], we get
0 log a 2 + x 2 sech ( b x ) d x = π b log 2 π Γ a b 2 π + 3 4 2 b Γ 2 a b + π 4 π 2
Derivation of Entry 4.373.2 in [8]
Using Equation (31) and setting a = 1 , b = π / 2 we get
0 log x 2 + 1 sech π x 2 d x = 2 log 4 π

6. Definite Integral Involving the Arctangent Function in Terms of the Stieltjes Constant γ 1

Theorem 13.
For all a , c C ,
0 sech a x 2 c log c 2 + x 2 + 2 x tan 1 x c c 2 + x 2 d x = γ 1 1 4 a c π + 3 + γ 1 a c + π 4 π + log 4 π a ψ ( 0 ) 1 4 a c π + 3 ψ ( 0 ) a c + π 4 π
Proof. 
Use Equation (30) and take the first partial derivative with respect to k followed by applying L’Hopital’s rule to the right-hand side as k 1 and simplify the left-hand side for the addition and subtraction of logarithmic functions and using Equation (64:4:1) in [12] and Equation (3.2) in [14]. Note the digamma function ψ 0 ( z ) is defined Section 6.3 in [10].  ☐
Example in Terms of the Riemann Zeta Function ζ ( k )
Theorem 14.
For all k C ,
0 ( 1 i x ) k + ( 1 + i x ) k sech π x 2 d x = 2 k + 2 2 k + 1 1 ζ ( k )
Proof. 
Use Equation (30) and replace c by π a and simplify using entry (2) in Table below (64:7) in [12].  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.373.1 in [8]
Theorem 15.
For all a , c C ,
0 sech 2 a x 2 log c 2 + x 2 d x = 4 ψ ( 0 ) a c + π 2 π + log 2 π a a
Proof. 
Use Equation (11) set m = 0 , replace c by e c and take the first partial derivative with respect to k followed by applying L’Hopital’s rule to the right-hand side as k 0 and simplify using Equation (64:4:1) and entry (4) in Table below (64:12:7) in [12].  ☐
Derivation of Entry 4.372.2 in [8]
Using Equation (35) and setting c = 0 , a = 2 and simplifying we get
0 log ( x ) sech 2 ( x ) d x = γ log 4 π
where γ is Euler’s constant given in Section 8.367 in [8].
Please See Table 1 for the table of integrals.

7. Mathematica Code

In this section, we give the Mathematica code [15] for the Table in Section 20. In some cases Mathematica is not able to evaluate the integrals, in which cases our formulae are provided.
Mathematics 09 01453 i001aMathematics 09 01453 i001b

8. Discussion

In this work, using our contour integration method, we achieve a few objectives from the definite integral in terms of the Lerch function formula. Firstly, we derived Fourier cosine and Fourier sine transforms along with two Mellin transforms. Furthermore we produce formal derivations for a few definite integrals in the book of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik [8]. We also derive a few new interesting definite integrals in terms of fundamental constants. We also provide extended evaluation for integrals through analytic continuation where possible. Finally, we summarized our work in the form a table of integrals for easy perusal by interested readers. We will be using our method to derive more formulae to produce more tables of integrals. We used Wolfram Mathematica to assist with the numeric evaluation of these formulae for complex values of the parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R.; Funding acquisition, A.S.; Supervision, A.S. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Grant No. 504070.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vetterli, M.; Ligtenberg, A. A Discrete Fourier-Cosine Transform Chip. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1986, 4, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ahmed, N.; Natarajan, T.; Rao, K.R. Discrete Cosine Transform. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1974, C-23, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Epstein, B. Some Applications of the Mellin Transform in Statistics. Ann. Math. Statist. 1948, 19, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zwicke, P.E.; Kiss, I. A New Implementation of the Mellin Transform and its Application to Radar Classification of Ships. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1983, PAMI-5, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohan, N.L.; Anandababu, L.; Seshagiri Rao, S.V. Gravity interpretation using the Mellin transform. Geophysics 1986, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tranter, C.J. The Use of the Mellin Transform in Finding the Stress Distribution in an Infinite Wedge. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1948, 1, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Method for Evaluating Definite Integrals in Terms of Special Functions with Examples. Int. Math. Forum 2020, 15, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 6th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. Integrals and Series, More Special Functions; USSR Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia, 1990; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th ed.; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  11. Erdéyli, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Higher Transcendental Functions; McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; London, UK, 1953; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oldham, K.B.; Myland, J.C.; Spanier, J. An Atlas of Functions: With Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Apostol, T.M. Introduction to Analytic Number Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Coffey, M.W. New summation relations for the Stieltjes constants. Proc. R. Soc. A 2006, 462, 2563–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moraño Fernández, J.A.; Sánchez Ruiz, L.M. Cálculo y Álgebra con Mathematica, 11th ed.; Universtat Politècnica de València: Valencia, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Table of Integrals.
Table 1. Table of Integrals.
f ( x ) 0 f ( x ) dx
x sech 2 ( x ) sin ( m x ) 1 4 π π m coth π m 2 2 csch π m 2
sech 2 a x 2 cos ( m x ) 2 π m a 2 csch π m a
x μ log ( x ) sech ( x ) ( μ x tanh ( x ) + 1 ) 1 μ + 1 e i π μ 2 ( 2 π ) μ + 1 B μ + 1 3 4
x μ log ( x ) sech ( x ) ( μ x tanh ( x ) + 1 ) 2 μ π μ + 1 ζ μ , 1 4 ζ μ , 3 4 sec π μ 2
x 2 k log ( x ) sech ( a x ) ( a x tanh ( a x ) + 2 k + 1 ) 4 k π 2 k + 1 1 a 2 k + 1 ζ 2 k , 1 4 ζ 2 k , 3 4 sec ( π k )
x 2 n log ( x ) sech 2 ( a x ) ( 2 a x tanh ( a x ) + 2 n + 1 ) 4 1 2 n 4 n 2 n 1 a 2 n + 1 ζ ( 2 n ) Γ ( 2 n )
log x 2 + 1 ( π x tanh ( π x ) + 1 ) sech ( π x ) 3 + π + log 81 Γ 3 4 4 64 Γ 1 4 4
sech ( a x ) ( log ( c i x ) + log ( c + i x ) ) π a log 2 π Γ a c 2 π + 3 4 2 a Γ 2 a c + π 4 π 2
log a 2 + x 2 sech ( b x ) π b log 2 π Γ a b 2 π + 3 4 2 b Γ 2 a b + π 4 π 2
log x 2 + 1 sech π x 2 2 log 4 π
( 1 i x ) k + ( 1 + i x ) k sech π x 2 2 k + 2 2 k + 1 1 ζ ( k )
sech 2 a x 2 log c 2 + x 2 4 a ψ ( 0 ) a c + π 2 π + log 2 π a
log ( x ) sech 2 ( x ) γ log 4 π
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Simultaneous Contour Method of a Trigonometric Integral by Prudnikov et al. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121453

AMA Style

Reynolds R, Stauffer A. Simultaneous Contour Method of a Trigonometric Integral by Prudnikov et al. Mathematics. 2021; 9(12):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reynolds, Robert, and Allan Stauffer. 2021. "Simultaneous Contour Method of a Trigonometric Integral by Prudnikov et al." Mathematics 9, no. 12: 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop