Next Article in Journal
Profitability Index Maximization in an Inventory Model with a Price- and Stock-Dependent Demand Rate in a Power-Form
Next Article in Special Issue
Oscillation of Second-Order Differential Equations with Multiple and Mixed Delays under a Canonical Operator
Previous Article in Journal
A Generalized Quasi Cubic Trigonometric Bernstein Basis Functions and Its B-Spline Form
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Numerical Simulation of HPDEs Using θ-Weighted Scheme and the Galerkin Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generalization of Quantum Ostrowski-Type Integral Inequalities

by
Muhammad Aamir Ali
1,†,
Sotiris K. Ntouyas
2,3,† and
Jessada Tariboon
4,*,†
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
3
Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM)-Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Intelligent and Nonlinear Dynamic Innovations Research Center, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2021, 9(10), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101155
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 12 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Differential Equations and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we prove some new Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for q-differentiable bounded functions. It is also shown that the results presented in this paper are a generalization of know results in the literarure. Applications to special means are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Quantum calculus, or q-calculus, is a modern term for the study of calculus without limits. It has been studied since the early eighteenth century. Euler, a prominent mathematician, invented q-calculus, and F. H. Jackson [1] discovered the definite q-integral known as the q-Jackson integral in 1910. Orthogonal polynomials, combinatorics, number theory, quantum theory, simple hypergeometric functions, dynamics, and theory of relativity are the applications of quantum calculus in mathematics and physics; see [2,3,4] and refernces cited there. Kac and Cheung’s book [5] discusses the fundamentals of quantum calculus as well as the basic theoretical terms.
Because of its enormous importance in a wide range of applied and pure sciences, in recent decades, the definition of convex and bounded functions has received much attention. Since the theory of inequalities and the concept of convex and bounded functions are closely related, various inequalities for convex, differentiable convex and differentiable bounded functions can be found in the literatur; see [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Inspired by this study, we prove some new quantum Ostrowski’s inequalities to expand the relationship between differentiable bounded functions and quantum integral inequalities. We prove some new quantum Ostrowski’s inequalities to expand the relationship between differentiable bounded functions and quantum integral inequalities, generalizing existing results in the literature [23].

2. Basics of q -Calculus

In this portion, we recall some formerly developed concepts. We also use the following notation in this paper (see [5]):
n q = 1 q n 1 q = 1 + q + q 2 + + q n 1 , q     0 , 1 .
In [1], the q-Jackson integral of a function F from 0 to π 2 and 0 < q < 1 is defined as follows:
0 π 2 F x d q x   =   1 q π 2 n = 0 q n F π 2 q n
provided the sum converges absolutely.
Definition 1.
Reference [4]: the quantum q π 1 -derivative for a mapping F   :   π 1 , π 2     R at x     π 1 , π 2 is defined as:
π 1 D q F x = F x F q x + 1 q π 1 1 q x π 1 , x π 1 .
If x = π 1 , we define π 1 D q F π 1   =   lim x π 1 π 1 D q F x if it exists and it is finite.
Definition 2.
Reference [13] The quantum q π 2 -derivative for a mapping F   :   π 1 , π 2     R at x     π 1 , π 2 is defined as:
π 2 D q F x = F q x + 1 q π 2 F x 1 q π 2 x , x π 2 .
If x = π 2 , we define π 2 D q F π 2   =   lim x π 2 π 2 D q F x if it exists and is finite.
Definition 3.
Reference [4]: the quantum q π 1 -definite integral for a mapping F   :   π 1 , π 2     R on π 1 , π 2 is defined as:
π 1 π 2 F x π 1 d q x = 1 q π 2 π 1 n = 0 q n F q n π 2 + 1 q n π 1 = π 2 π 1 0 1 F 1 t π 1 + t π 2 d q t .
Definition 4.
Reference [13]: The quantum q π 2 -definite integral for a mapping F   :   π 1 , π 2     R on π 1 , π 2 is defined as:
π 1 π 2 F x π 2 d q x = 1 q π 2 π 1 n = 0 q n F q n π 1 + 1 q n π 2 = π 2 π 1 0 1 F t π 1 + 1 t π 2 d q t .
Now, we present the classical Ostrowski inequality.
Theorem 1.
Let F   :   π 1 , π 2     R be a continuous function that is differentiable on π 1 , π 2 . If F x M , then we have the following inequality for x π 1 , π 2 :
F x 1 π 2 π 1 π 1 π 2 F t d t M π 2 π 1 x π 1 2 + π 2 x 2 2 .
The quantum version of the inequality (3) given by Budak et al. can be stated as:
Theorem 2.
Reference [17]: Let F   :   π 1 , π 2     R     R be a function. If π 2 D q F t , | π 1 D q F t | M for all t π 1 , π 2 , then we have the following quantum Ostrowski-type inequality:
F x 1 π 2 π 1 π 1 x F t   π 1 d q t + x π 2 F t   π 2 d q t q M π 2 π 1 x π 1 2 + π 2 x 2 1 + q
for all x π 1 , π 2 where 0 < q < 1 .

3. Quantum Ostrowski Type Inequalities

In this section, for the q-differentiable bounded functions, we prove some new Ostrowski-type inequalities. For this, we propose a new quantum integral identity that will be used as an aid in the development of new results.
Lemma 1.
Let F   :   π 1 , π 2     R be a continuous and q-differentiable function on the given interval π 1 , π 2 . Then, the following equality holds for the quantum integrals:
π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 D q F t π 1 d q t + x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 D q F t π 2 d q t = π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t ,
where h 0 , 1 and π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 .
Proof. 
Using the fundamental concepts of q integration and derivative [24], we have
π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 D q F t π 1 d q t = x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 F x + h π 2 π 1 2 F π 1 π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t
and
x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 D q F t π 2 d q t = h π 2 π 1 2 F π 2 x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 F x x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t .
After the addition of equalities (6) and (7), we obtain the required equality (5). □
Remark 1.
By taking the limit as q 1 in Lemma 1, we have
π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 F t d t + x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 F t d t = π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 π 2 F t d t
which is given by Dragomir et al. in [23] (Theorem 2).
Remark 2.
In Lemma 1, if we set h = 0 , then we have
π 1 x t π 1 π 1 D q F t π 1 d q t + x π 2 t π 2 π 2 D q F t π 2 d q t = π 2 π 1 F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t .
Theorem 3.
Assume that the conditions of Lemma 1 hold. If π 1 D q F t , π 2 D q F t M , then
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t M P π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q + Q π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q ,
where
P π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q = π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 d q t
and
Q π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q = x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 d q t .
Proof. 
From Lemma 1 and properties of the modulus, we have
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 D q F t π 1 d q t + x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 D q F t π 2 d q t M π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 d q t + M x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 d q t = M P π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q + Q π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q .
Remark 3.
By taking the limit as q 1 in Theorem 3, we obtain the following inequality:
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 π 2 F t d t M 1 4 π 2 π 1 2 h 2 + h 1 2 + x π 1 + π 2 2 2
which is given by Dragomir et al. in [23] (Theorem 2).
Remark 4.
In Theorem 3, if we put h = 0 , then we have:
π 2 π 1 F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t M P π 1 , π 2 , 0 , x ; q + Q π 1 , π 2 , 0 , x ; q .
Theorem 4.
Assume that the conditions of Lemma 1 hold. If for p > 1 , π 1 D q F t p , π 2 D q F t p M , then
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t M x π 1 A 1 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q + π 2 x A 2 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q
where
A 1 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q = π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 s π 1 d q t 1 s , A 2 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q = x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 s π 1 d q t 1 s
and 1 p + 1 s = 1 .
Proof. 
From Lemma 1 and Hölder’s inequality, we have
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 π 1 D q F t π 1 d q t + x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 π 2 D q F t π 2 d q t π 1 x t π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 s π 1 d q t 1 s π 1 x π 1 D q F t p π 1 d q t 1 p + x π 2 t π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 s π 1 d q t 1 s x π 2 π 2 D q F t p π 2 d q t 1 p M x π 1 A 1 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q + π 2 x A 2 π 1 , π 2 , h , x ; q .
Remark 5.
By taking the limit as q 1 in Theorem 4, we have:
π 2 π 1 h F π 1 + F π 2 2 + π 2 π 1 1 h F x π 1 π 2 F t d t M x π 1 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 s + h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 + π 2 x x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 s h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 .
Remark 6.
In Theorem 4, if we put h = 0 , we have:
π 2 π 1 F x π 1 x F q t + 1 q π 1 π 1 d q t + x π 2 F q t + 1 q π 2 π 2 d q t M x π 1 A 1 π 1 , π 2 , 0 , x ; q + π 2 x A 2 π 1 , π 2 , 0 , x ; q .

4. Application to Special Means

For arbitrary positive numbers π 1 , π 2 ( π 1 π 2 ) , we consider the means as follows:
  • The arithmetic mean
    A = A ( π 1 , π 2 ) = π 1 + π 2 2 .
  • The harmonic mean
    H = H π 1 , π 2 = 2 π 1 π 2 π 1 + π 2 .
  • The logarithmic mean
    L = L π 1 , π 2 = π 1 π 2 ln π 2 ln π 1 .
  • The p-logarithmic mean
    L p = L p π 1 , π 2 = π 1 , if π 1 = π 2 π 2 p + 1 π 1 p + 1 p + 1 π 2 π 1 1 p , if π 1 π 2 .
Proposition 1.
For π 1 , π 2 R , π 1 < π 2 and p R \ 1 , 0 , the following inequality is true:
1 h x p + h A π 1 p , π 2 p L p p π 1 , π 2 π 2 π 1 h 2 + h 1 2 4 + x A π 1 , π 2 π 2 π 1 ϵ p π 1 , π 2
where
ϵ p π 1 , π 2 = p π 2 p 1 , if p > 1 , p π 1 p 1 , if p ( , 1 ] \ 1 , 0 .
Proof. 
The inequality (8) for the mapping F   :   0 ,     0 , , F x   =   x p leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 2.
For π 1 , π 2 R , π 1 < π 2 , the following inequality is true:
1 h H π 1 , π 2 L π 1 , π 2 + L π 1 , π 2 x h x H π 1 , π 2 x H π 1 , π 2 L π 1 , π 2 π 1 2 π 2 π 1 h 2 + h 1 2 4 + x A π 1 , π 2 π 2 π 1 .
Proof. 
The inequality (8) for the mapping F   :   0 ,     0 , , F x   =   1 x leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 3.
For π 1 , π 2 R , π 1 < π 2 and p R \ 1 , 0 , the following inequality is true:
1 h x p + h A π 1 p , π 2 p L p p π 1 , π 2 x π 1 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 s + h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 + π 2 x x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 s h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 ϵ p π 1 , π 2 .
Proof. 
The inequality in Remark 5, for the mapping F   :   0 ,     0 , , F x   =   x p , leads to this conclusion. □
Proposition 4.
For π 1 , π 2 R , π 1 < π 2 , the following inequality is true:
1 h H π 1 , π 2 L π 1 , π 2 + L π 1 , π 2 x h x H π 1 , π 2 x H π 1 , π 2 L π 1 , π 2 π 1 2 x π 1 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 x π 1 + h π 2 π 1 2 s + h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 + π 2 x x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 x π 2 h π 2 π 1 2 s h π 2 π 1 2 s + 2 s + 1 .
Proof. 
The inequality (9) for the mapping F   :   0 ,     0 , , F x   =   1 x , leads to this conclusion. □

5. Conclusions

Some new Ostrowski-type integral inequalities for q-differentiable bounded functions are established in the present research, generalizing existing results in the literature. Applications to special means are also discussed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.A., S.K.N., J.T.; Formal analysis, M.A.A., S.K.N., J.T.; Funding acquisition, J.T.; Methodology, M.A.A., S.K.N., J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand. Contract no. 6142105. The work of M.A.A. is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11971241).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Quarterly J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ernst, T. The History of q-Calculus and New Method; Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yildrim, H. Some new Simpson’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in quantum calculus. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 4515–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Abbas, M.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second qπ2-derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, M.A.; Abbas, M.; Budak, H.; Agarwal, P.; Murtaza, G.; Chu, Y.-M. New quantum boundaries for quantum Simpson’s and quantum Newton’s type inequalities for preinvex functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, M.A.; Chu, Y.-M.; Budak, H.; Akkurt, A.; Yildrim, H. Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, M.A.; Alp, N.; Budak, H.; Chu, Y.-M.; Zhang, Z. On some new quantum midpoint type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable convex functions. Open Math. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Akkurt, A.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Ostrowski type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus. Open Math. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z.; Kunt, M.; İşcan, İ. q-Hermite Hadamard inequalities and quantum estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2018, 30, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bermudo, S.; Kórus, P.; Valdés, J.N. On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions. Acta Math. Hung. 2020, 162, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Budak, H. Some trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities for newly defined quantum integrals. Proyecciones 2021, 40, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Budak, H.; Ali, M.A.; Tarhanaci, M. Some new quantum Hermite-Hadamard-like inequalities for coordinated convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2020, 186, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Budak, H.; Erden, S.; Ali, M.A. Simpson and Newton type inequalities for convex functions via newly defined quantum integrals. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2020, 44, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Budak, H.; Ali, M.A.; Alp, N.; Chu, Y.-M. Quantum Ostrowski type integral inequalities. J. Math. Inequal. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q-calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 251, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Awan, M.U. Some quantum integral inequalities via preinvex functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 269, 242–251. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sudsutad, W.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Quantum integral inequalities for convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2015, 9, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhuang, H.; Liu, W.; Park, J. Some quantum estimates of Hermite-Hadmard inequalities for quasi-convex functions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Dragomir, S.S.; Cerone, P.; Roumeliotis, J. A new generalization of Ostrowski’s integral inequality for mapping whose derivatives are bounded and application in numerical integration and for special means. Appl. Math. Lett. 2000, 13, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kunt, M.; Baidar, A.W.; Şanli, Z. Left-right quantum derivatives and definite integrals. Authorea 2020. Available online: https://www.authorea.com/users/346089/articles/472188 (accessed on 10 May 2021). [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, M.A.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Generalization of Quantum Ostrowski-Type Integral Inequalities. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101155

AMA Style

Ali MA, Ntouyas SK, Tariboon J. Generalization of Quantum Ostrowski-Type Integral Inequalities. Mathematics. 2021; 9(10):1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Muhammad Aamir, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, and Jessada Tariboon. 2021. "Generalization of Quantum Ostrowski-Type Integral Inequalities" Mathematics 9, no. 10: 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop