Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Salvia officinalis L. Essential Oil
Next Article in Special Issue
iTRAQ-Based Proteomic and Physiological Analyses Reveal the Mechanisms of Dehydration and Cryopreservation Tolerance of Sophora tonkinensis Gagnep. Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Key Pathways and Genes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis halleri Roots under Cadmium Stress Responses: Differences and Similarities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Distribution of Cedrela odorata L. in Mexico according to Its Optimal Thermal Range for Seed Germination under Different Climate Change Scenarios
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/plants12091790
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation in Seed Dormancy of Chaco Seasonally Dry Forest Species: Effects of Seed Traits and Population Environmental Conditions

by
Tania Bertuzzi
1,
Diego López-Spahr
2,
Carlos A. Gómez
2,3,
Silvia Sühring
2,
Gisela Malagrina
4,
Carol C. Baskin
5,6 and
Guadalupe Galíndez
7,*
1
Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Catamarca (CITCA)—CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Catamarca, Catamarca 4700, Argentina
2
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta 4400, Argentina
3
Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica de Barrido (LASEM)—CCT-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta 4400, Argentina
4
Banco Base de Germoplasma, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, CIRN-INTA, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires 1686, Argentina
5
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA
6
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0321, USA
7
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta—CCT-CONICET, Salta 4400, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(9), 1790; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091790
Submission received: 16 January 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Seed Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The persistence of subtropical seasonally dry forests urgently requires the implementation of ex situ conservation and restoration programs. We studied variation in seed traits and dormancy of six native species growing in seasonally dry Chaco forests of Argentina. We documented high intra- and interspecific variability in seed traits and dormancy. Fresh seeds of Geoffroea decorticans and Parasenegalia visco (Fabaceae) were water-permeable and nondormant (ND), while those of Parkinsonia praecox and Vachellia aroma (Fabaceae) were water-impermeable and had physical dormancy (PY). Seeds of Schnopsis lorentzii (Anacardiaceae) and Sarcomphalus mistol (Rhamnaceae) were water-permeable and had physiological dormancy (PD). Mechanical and chemical scarification were the most effective methods to break PY, and dry storage for 3 months was effective in breaking PD. Seeds of large-seeded species were ND or had PD, and those of small-seeded species had PY. Species inhabiting moist habitats had ND seeds, whereas those from seasonally dry habitats had seeds with PY or PD. These results suggest that seed traits and dormancy are species-specific and that intraspecific variation in seed traits is likely associated with high phenotypic plasticity of species in response to local environmental heterogeneity. These findings should be considered at the time of implementation of conservation techniques and for seed sourcing decisions for restoration.

1. Introduction

The subtropical seasonally dry forests of Argentina, like many other forests in the world, have suffered great destruction due to deforestation, overgrazing, fires, and land-use changes to agriculture [1]. In addition, numerous native species have high value for use as wood sources and are being overexploited for charcoal, building materials, and/or for medicinal and/or ornamental purposes. This situation has led to the impoverishment and reduction of native forests [2], and many species have become locally extinct or are threatened regionally, making ex situ conservation and ecological restoration a priority for these forests. The storage of seeds in gene banks is the most practicable and least expensive way to conserve plant biodiversity [3]. For successful seed storage to ensure current and/or future uses, it is necessary to determine seed storage behavior and develop standard protocols for seed dormancy-break and germination [4]. Moreover, morphological/physical (e.g., seed mass, seed moisture content, seed coat features) and physiological (e.g., seed dormancy) seed traits are in many cases a prerequisite for management decisions and successful ecological restoration [5,6]. In this sense, Seglias et al. [7] highlighted the relevance of identifying intraspecific variation in seed dormancy and germination before recommending the use of specific seed sources and whether restoration can be accomplished at the species level.
Seed dormancy is an important adaptive trait that helps to ensure that seeds germinate only when conditions are favorable for successful seedling establishment and growth [8]. Among the classes of seed dormancy, physiological dormancy (PD) is the most common and occurs in different plant lineages and ecosystems around the world [9]. PD is due to a physiological inhibiting mechanism in the embryo (e.g., high level of abscisic acid in the embryo) that decreases the growth potential of the embryo, thus preventing it from being able to overcome the mechanical resistance of the endosperm, perisperm, seed coats or an indehiscent fruit wall [10]. The second most common class of dormancy is physical dormancy (PY), which is caused by the presence of water-impermeable palisade cell layer(s) in the seed or fruit coat; it has been reported in 18 angiosperm families, including Anacardiaceae, Fabaceae, and Rhamnaceae [8]. Although PY has been linked to phylogeny, there are species in these families whose seeds are nondormant (ND) or have PD or PY+PD [8].
Species with PY also have been documented in different ecosystems around the world, although they are more prevalent in dry ecosystems with seasonal rainfall, relatively high temperatures and low relative humidity than in moist environments with aseasonal rainfall, relatively low temperatures, and high humidity [9,11,12]. Baskin and Baskin [13] proposed that the selective force for evolution of PY was climatic drying, resulting in seasonally dry forest habitats within the tropics and subtropics. Thus, PY evolved as a mechanism for delaying germination until the beginning of next rainy season in seasonally dry environments. These authors also mentioned that large-seeded species with a high water content at maturity and intolerance to desiccation (i.e., recalcitrant species) are not compatible with seasonally dry environments. On the other hand, small seeded species with a low water content and tolerance to desiccation (i.e., orthodox seeds) are characteristic of these environments and have PY or PD. In this sense, Rubio de Casas et al. [12], taking Fabaceae as a case study, proposed that within a given lineage, taxa producing small dormant seeds will predominate in seasonal environments, whereas large ND seeds will predominate in aseasonal environments. Thus, PY gives small seeds an adaptive advantage by delaying seed germination until the dry season ends and the moist season begins, which would be the most favorable time for seedling establishment.
Seeds with PY have a morpho-anatomical specialized region, called a ‘water-gap’, that differs anatomically from the rest of the seed coat [14]. Species of Anacardiaceae with PY have a water-impermeable fruit coat, and the water-gap is a specialized structure in the endocarp (carpellary micropyle) [15]. Seeds of Fabaceae and Rhamnaceae with PY have a water-impermeable seed coat, and the water gap is a lens and hilar slit, respectively [8,14]. The water gap acts as an environmental signal detector, and it opens in response to specific conditions thereby allowing water to enter the seed thus promoting germination [14]. The location, morpho-anatomy, and origin of water gaps can vary between and even within families [8,14]. In natural environments, seasonal temperature variation, high or low temperatures, and/or fires are signals that can disrupt or dislodge the water gap marking the termination of dormancy. However, in laboratory mechanical and chemical scarification, dry or wet heat conditions and even dry storage can break PY or make seeds sensitive to dormancy-breaking treatments [8,16,17,18]. In addition, Rodrigues-Junior [19] reported that large seeds of Senna multijuga (Fabaceae) are more sensitive to dormancy break than small seed due to their high MC, relatively thin seed coat, and low seed coat thickness: seed mass ratio. After seeds or fruits become permeable to water, they can germinate in both light and darkness over a wide range of temperatures [13].
In addition, several studies have reported within-species variation in seed traits, seed dormancy and germination that is associated with climatic differences among sites and/or with different environmental conditions during seed maturation (i.e., maternal environmental effect) [8,9,20]. For example, Rubio de Cases et al. [12] and Renzi et al. [21] documented a positive association between seed dormancy and latitude, while Fernández-Pascual et al. [22] reported a positive correlation between dormancy and altitude and with sites with high temperature variation. Further, the development of the water-impermeable coat occurs at the final phase of seed maturation when the seed MC decreases to 8–15%, depending on the species and the maternal environmental conditions during this phase [23]. Thus, depending on the maternal environmental factors, the structure and thickness of the seed coat can vary among populations and over the years [18]. Plant species exhibit a high ability to generate different phenotypes in response to variation in the environment (i.e., phenotypic plasticity) [21].
The Chaco subtropical dry forest in northwestern Argentina is an example of a bioregion with a seasonal environment [24,25]. Precipitation is erratic with marked differences between the wet (predominantly summer) and dry (with marked water deficit) seasons, and temperatures tend to be high (≥30 °C on average in summer) but vary with latitude and altitude [25]. Three vegetation units can be distinguished in the Chaco forests based on elevation and amount of annual precipitation: (1) Arid Chaco in the Central Valley of Catamarca Province at 200 and 600 m a.s.l. receives 350–650 mm of rain, (2) Semiarid Chaco in the eastern part of Catamarca Province at 300 and 600 m a.s.l. receives 650–1000 mm of rain, and (3) Chaco Serrano on mountain extensions at 600 and 1500 m a.s.l. receives 500–800 mm of rain [25,26]. Some of the characteristic native trees of the Chaco forest include the Anacardiaceae species Schinopsis lorentzii; the Fabaceae species Geoffroea decorticans, Parasenegalia visco, Parkinsonia praecox, and Vachellia aroma; and the Rhamnaceae species Sarcomphalus mistol. P. visco and V. aroma are characteristic species of Chaco Serrano; S. mistol, P. praecox, and G. decorticans of Arid and Semiarid Chaco; and S. lorentzii of Chaco Serrano and Semiarid Chaco.
Previous studies concluded that seeds of G. decorticans [15], P. praecox [27,28,29,30], S. mistol [27,31], S. lorentzii [32], and V. aroma [32,33,34] have PY. It also has been reported that seeds of G. decorticans [17,35] and S. mistol [36] are ND, and species of Schinopsis [37] are reported to have PD or be ND. There is no information about dormancy of P. visco seeds. In this context, knowledge of seed traits, type of seed dormancy, seed dormancy-breaking mechanism, and the relation between seed dormancy and the environmental conditions in the habitat of each species is key for predicting plant regeneration and population dynamics of the species in natural and anthropized environments. Additionally, this information is required for efficient use of seeds in restoration and conservation programs, both of which are urgently required for the persistence of the Chaco seasonally dry forests in Argentina (National Native Forests Law N° 26.331/2007).
The broad objective of our research was to study seed dormancy of these six Chaco species, evaluating their inter- and intraspecific variability in relation to seed traits and environmental variables. All these species can grow in each of the three kinds of Chaco forests, but due to differences in environmental conditions in the forests it is possible that seed dormancy and seed traits differ among species and/or populations [38]. Our first hypothesis was that Anacardiaceae, Fabaceae species (except for G. decorticans that has ND seeds [17]), and Rhamnaceae have seed dormancy (PY and/or PD). We expected seeds of G. decorticans to have a permeable seed coat and those of the other species to have a water-impermeable coat (PY) and/or permeable coats but low or no initial germination (PD). Our second hypothesis was that seed dormancy is related to seed traits. We expected that small-seeded species and/or populations have seeds with a relatively low moisture content (MC), a thick seed coat, and therefore PY; whereas large-seeded species and/or populations have seeds with a relatively high MC, a thin seed coat, and therefore ND or PD. Finally, our third hypothesis was that seeds of species and/or populations occupying the same environment (i.e., vegetation units) have the same class of dormancy. We expected species and/or populations from Arid Chaco to have dormant seeds (PY or PD) and those from Semiarid and Serrano Chaco to have ND seeds.

2. Results

2.1. Seed Traits

Initial seed viability was on average ≥ 80% for all species, with no significant differences among populations (p > 0.05). MC and seed mass varied among species and, depending on the species, between populations (Table 1). Seeds of P. visco, P. praecox, V. aroma, and S. lorentzii had on average a higher MC (8.9%) than those of S. mistol (7.9%) and G. decorticans (5.8%). For P. visco, S. mistol, and V. aroma, differences in seed MC between populations were observed. Seed mass ranged from <50 mg in P. praecox to >700 mg in G. decorticans (Table 1 and Figure 1). Except for P. praecox and S. lorentzii, seed mass varied among populations of a species. Seeds of P. visco germinated to almost 100% in all light and temperature conditions, and the time to 50% germination (t50) was low and similar among populations and treatments (>3 d). Germination of G. decorticans was higher in darkness at 25 °C (≥78%) than at the other conditions, with no differences among populations. For the other species, germination was lower than 50% and differed between populations and/or treatments, depending on the species (Table 1).
The dispersal/germination unit for G. decorticans, S. mistol, and S. lorentzii is a fruit, and no water gaps were observed. G. decorticans and S. mistol have a woody endocarp composed of several layers of sclerified cells (Figure 1 and Figure 2A,B). S. lorentzii has a woody pericarp consisting of an exocarp with various layers of thick lignified cells, a mesocarp with an external layer of suberized cells and various layers of sclereids, and an endocarp with two or three layers of sclereids, that were smaller than those of the mesocarp (Figure 1 and Figure 2C). Seeds of P. visco, P. praecox, and V. aroma have a lens in the hilar–micropylar region (Figure 2D,G,J). The seed coat of P. visco has three zones: one macrosclereid layer (palisade) with no distinguishable light-line, one osteosclereid layer (hourglass cells), and various layers of sclerified parenchyma (Figure 2E,F). P. praecox has a seed coat also composed of three zones: one palisade layer with a light-line in the middle of the cells, one hourglass cell layer, and various layers of sclerified parenchyma (Figure 2H,I). V. aroma has a seed coat with two zones: one palisade layer with a light-line in the external half of the cells, and various layers of sclerified parenchyma (Figure 2K,L).
For seeds of P. visco, P. praecox, and V. aroma, thickness of palisade layer in the seed coat, seed coat thickness, and seed width varied among species and populations (Table 2). Seeds of V. aroma and P. praecox had the thickest palisade layer (>0.06 mm and ≤0.04 mm, respectively). Thickness of the palisade layer varied among populations of V. aroma but not P. praecox. G. decorticans had the thickest coat and widest seeds (>2.5 mm and 10 mm, respectively), whereas P. visco had the thinnest coat (≤0.14 mm) and P. praecox the narrowest seeds (≤2 mm). Only for G. decorticans did coat thickness vary among populations. The seed coat thickness: seed width and seed coat thickness: seed mass ratios varied among species, with S. lorentzii showing the highest ratios (≥0.40 and ≥0.010, respectively), and P. visco the lowest (≤0.12 and 0.001, respectively). Except for S. lorentzii and V. aroma, population differences were found for the seed coat thickness: seed width ratio.

2.2. Seed Dormancy

2.2.1. Imbibition Curve

After a week of imbibition, intact and mechanically scarified seeds of G. decorticans, P. visco, S. mistol and S. lorentzii did not differ in percentage of water imbibed (Table 1). In contrast, the mass of mechanically scarified seeds of P. praecox and V. aroma increased at least 120%, whereas that of intact seeds only increased 60%. Significant differences in mass increase among populations occurred only for V. aroma.

2.2.2. Dormancy-Breaking Treatments

Germination percentages and t50 differed significantly among populations and treatments (Figure 3) for P. praecox, V. aroma, S. mistol, and S. lorentzii. For all populations of P. praecox, 95–100% germination occurred between 3 and 5 days after mechanical scarification, wet heat treatment (100 °C), and chemical scarification (20 and 30 min; Figure 3A). V. aroma seeds from all populations germinated to 100% in <2 days after mechanical scarification and those from Capital also after chemical scarification (30 min; Figure 3B). Three months of dry storage affected seed germination of S. mistol and S. lorentzii (Figure 3C,D). For S. mistol, storage increased germination of intact seeds from Recreo (from 28% to 52%), decreased germination of seeds from Huaycama (from 48% to 22%) and had no effect on germination of seeds from Pomancillo Oeste (3% and 6%; Table 1 and Figure 3C). Mechanical and chemical scarification increased germination, mainly for seeds from Huaycama and Recreo, and no germination was registered after wet heat treatment (100 °C) for all populations (Figure 3C). For S. lorentzii, storage significantly increased germination of intact seeds from El Portezuelo and La Quebrada (Table 1, Figure 3D). The response to different scarification and heat treatments varied depending on the population and treatments (Figure 3D).
After chemical scarification, the water gap on seeds of P. praecox and V. aroma opened by removal or fissure of the lens (Figure 4 and Figure 5), and wet heat treatments but not dry heat treatments caused the lens on P. praecox seeds to open (Figure 4E,F).

2.3. Associations between MC, Seed Mass, Morpho-Anatomical Traits, and Geographic and Environmental Variables

Seed MC correlated negatively with coat thickness (r = −0.92, p < 0.001), seed width (r = −0.95, p < 0.001) and seed mass (r = −0.95, p < 0.001), whereas coat thickness correlated positively with seed width (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) and seed mass (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). Seed width correlated positively with seed mass (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). The seed coat thickness: seed width ratio correlated positively with the seed coat thickness: seed mass ratio (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Seed coat thickness: seed width and seed coat thickness: seed mass ratios correlated negatively with latitude (r = −0.57 and −0.56, respectively, p ≤ 0.02). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first and second components accounted for 72.1% of total variation between species and populations for all variables considered in the analysis (Figure 6). PC1 explained 39.7% of the variation and ordered species and/or populations according to seed mass, seed coat thickness, and seed width. Thus, all G. decorticans populations, S. mistol (Recreo), and S. lorentzii (Santo Domingo) were located to the right of axis 1 and had high seed mass, seed coat thickness, and seed width, and low MC. In contrast, all populations of P. visco, V. aroma, and P. praecox (Pomancillo Este and Santa Cruz) were located on the left side of the biplot and were characterized by high seed MC, and low seed mass, seed coat thickness, and seed width.
PC2 explained 32.4% of the variation and separated species and/or populations according to environmental variables and to seed coat thickness: seed width and seed coat thickness: seed mass ratios. All populations of P. visco and G. decorticans were associated with high altitude, latitude, and annual precipitation (AT), since they corresponded to positive scores on PC2. However, P. praecox (Recreo and Santa Cruz), V. aroma (Capital and Colonia del Valle), S. mistol (Huaycama and Recreo), and S. lorentzii (Santo Domingo), corresponding to negative scores, had high seed coat thickness: seed width and seed coat thickness: seed mass ratios and mean annual temperature (MAT). The remaining populations of P. praecox, V. aroma, S. mistol, and S. lorentzii had scores near zero on axis 1 and 2 and are characterized by a seed MC similar to that of P. visco and coat: width and coat: mass ratios similar to those of G. decorticans.

3. Discussion

3.1. Seed Traits and Seed Dormancy

The combination of morphological and physiological seed traits and environmental conditions (e.g., light, temperature, and water availability) result in the coordination of seed dispersal and germination at an optimal time for successful seedling establishment [8,39]. In our study, we found interspecific variability in all seed traits evaluated among the six native species growing in seasonally dry Chaco forests of Argentina. In general, the highest values for seed mass and morpho-anatomical seed traits were found in species (e.g., G. decorticans, S. mistol, and S. lorentzii) whose dispersal units were fruits, and the lowest in species whose dispersal units were seeds. All species showed differences in light and temperature requirements for germination. Thus, for G. decorticans, seed germination percentage was highest in darkness at a constant temperature, whereas P. visco seeds germinated to high percentages in all conditions evaluated. These characteristics would allow seeds of G. decorticans to germinate under buried conditions; whereas seeds of P. visco could germinate either under buried conditions or on the soil surface. For the other species, the low germination percentage in all light and temperature conditions indicates the presence of seed dormancy and the requirement for exposure of seeds to specific environmental conditions to promote dormancy-break and germination. Similar results have been reported for these species and other species characteristic of the seasonally dry Chaco forests of Argentina [38,40]. This interspecific variation in seed traits and seed germination could have important implications for the regeneration and coexistence (regeneration niche differentiation) of these species in the three kinds of Chaco seasonally dry forests inhabited by these species.
In our study, we confirmed our first hypothesis that species of Anacardiaceae, Fabaceae (except for G. decorticans that has ND seeds), and Rhamnaceae have seed dormancy (PY and/or PD). However, seeds of the legume P. visco are ND. Through initial water-imbibition tests and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses, we confirmed that seeds of P. praecox and V. aroma have PY with thick water-impermeable seed coats and a high thickness: seed mass ratio. The lens functions as water gap (Complex Type II simple water gap), which is characteristic of Fabaceae sensu Gama-Arachchige et al. [14]. For P. visco, the lack of PY was associated with a thin water-permeable seed coat and a low thickness: seed mass ratio. For G. decorticans, although the woody endocarp was thick, it was permeable to water, and seeds of S. lorentzii (Anacardiaceae) and S. mistol (Rhamnaceae) had PD, as confirmed by their low initial germination and the presence of a water-permeable seed coat.
It has been reported that seed mass, seed MC, and seed coat thickness are related to dormancy break [19]. These authors reported that seeds of small-seeded species tend to have a relatively low MC, thick seed coat, and PY; whereas those of large-seeded species tend to have a relatively high MC, thin seed coats, and be ND. In contrast to our second hypothesis, we found that seeds of large-seeded species have on average a low MC and high seed coat thickness and seed width, and they are ND (G. decorticans) or have PD (S. mistol and S. lorentzii). However, if we considered only Fabaceae species, seeds of G. decorticans and P. visco with high seed mass were ND, whereas those of P. praecox and V. aroma with low seed mass had PY. It has been suggested that species with large seeds have a proportionally thinner seed coat (i.e., reduced dormancy) than those with small seeds and that seedlings from large seeds have large reserves and can thrive in unfavorable environments better than those from small seeds with low reserves [12].
Similar to our results, other studies have shown that seeds of P. praecox and V. aroma have PY [28,29,32,33,34]. However, contrary to our results, seeds of G. decorticans [27], S. mistol [27,31], and S. lorentzii [32] had been reported to have PY. The difference between our results and those of other authors probably is due to differences in methods used to determine the class of dormancy. In previous studies for these three species, only methods to break PY were evaluated, and no imbibition studies were conducted, which are critical experiments to prove that seeds are water-impermeable [8]. The major problem with the methods in the previous studies is that they could have broken PD, which was confirmed in our study. Thus, for S. mistol and S. lorentzii, our results agree with the results of Baskin and Baskin [8,41] who mentioned that these species have PD. For P. visco, this is the first report of the absence of PY.
For P. praecox, mechanical and acid scarification and wet heat increased seed germination, and acid scarification and wet heat opened the water gap [29,30]. For V. aroma, only mechanical and acid scarification increased seed germination, and acid scarification opened the water gap [32,33]. For S. mistol and S. lorentzii, depending on the population, 3 months of dry storage significantly increased germination of intact seeds, suggesting that fresh seeds had non-deep PD that was broken via after-ripening during storage [41]. Interestingly, Venier et al. [33] reported that passage of V. aroma seeds through the digestive tract of cattle increased germination. Further, Renison et al. [27] reported that passage of G. decorticans and S. mistol seeds through the digestive tract of a large flightless bird native to South America increased germination.
Seeds of G. decorticans and P. visco (large-seeded species and ND) which are dispersed during the rainy season (summer) germinate immediately after dispersal, whereas those of P. praecox and V. aroma (small-seeded species and PY) are dispersed during the dry season (spring and autumn, respectively), and germinate in the following rainy season. During the dry season, seeds in the soil seed bank may be exposed to heat from spring fires that could open the water gap. These results suggest that the heat from fires can act as an environmental signal for the breaking of PY [42]. In addition, germination of S. lorentizii and S. mistol seeds is delayed until PD is broken via after-ripening, which can occur during the dry season (Figure 7). However, the role of environmental factors on the seed dormancy of these species requires further research.
Intraspecific variability of seed traits and seed dormancy and germination has been widely reported in many species and ecosystems around the world, and it has important consequences for the natural regeneration and persistence of species in their native habitats [8]. In our study, we also found high intraspecific variability in seed traits and seed dormancy and seed germination. Except for P. praecox and S. lorentzii, the study species exhibited intraspecific variability in most seed traits, probably due to a high phenotypic plasticity [12,38,43]. For seeds of S. mistol and S. lorentzii, (with PD), the response to dry storage differed among populations, which may be associated with differences in the intensity of PD and/or sensitivity to dormancy-breaking factors [18]. In contrast, seeds of P. praecox and V. aroma from all populations showed a similar pattern of response to dormancy-breaking methods, suggesting that seed dormancy is a conservative trait associated with phylogeny in these species [8]. Finally, intraspecific variation would give species a competitive advantage in the seasonal dry Chaco forests characterized by erratic precipitation and by temperatures that vary with latitude and altitude, and it may enhance colonization of species in new environments, particularly under scenarios of climate change [39].

3.2. Associations between Seed Traits, Seed Dormancy, and Environmental Variables

Geographical gradients of environmental factors such as temperature and precipitation offer opportunities for evaluating intra- and interspecific variability in plant traits and provide the possibility to analyze association between seed traits, seed dormancy, and environmental variables [44]. A positive correlation between dormancy and latitude and/or altitude has been widely reported [12,22,44,45]. In our study, we only found a negative correlation between the seed coat thickness: seed width and seed coat thickness: seed mass ratios and latitude, indicating that species and/or populations from high latitudes (southern population) had thicker seed coats in relation to seed width and mass than those from northern populations. However, southern species and/or populations have ND seeds. We also found that MC correlated negatively with seed mass and seed width, and coat thickness correlated positively with seed mass and seed width, contrary to the report by Rodrigues-Junior et al. [19] for Fabaceae. However, these results could be biased by the disproportionately higher values of seed mass, width, and coat thickness of G. decorticans compared with the other species.
Finally, species and populations were grouped in the PC Analysis according to seed mass, MC, seed width, and coat thickness; i.e., seed traits were species-specific. However, species and populations also were grouped according to environments variables, which partially supported our third hypothesis. That is, in all three Chaco vegetation units we found species with PY, PD, and ND. However, species and populations from sites with (on average) a higher altitude, latitude, and annual precipitation have ND seeds; whereas those from sites with (on average) a higher annual temperature have seeds with PY or PD. These results support the conclusion of Baskin and Baskin [13] that species with seed dormancy (PD and PY) are prevalent in seasonally dry environments. In the same sense, seed dormancy of Pisum sativum [44] and Medicago trunculata [12] is associated with increased annual temperatures. However, for other Fabaceae species, including V. aroma, other studies did not find a significant relationship between dormancy and rainfall or between dormancy and temperature gradients [34,46]. For V. aroma, Ferreras et al. [34] observed a trend toward a higher percentage of seed imbibition (lower PY) at the most humid extreme of a precipitation gradient in dry forests of the central region of Argentina.
Knowledge of seed traits and seed dormancy is essential for biodiversity conservation and can inform decisions for in situ and ex situ conservation and restoration management of species. Additionally, the information is needed for anticipating the response of species to current and/or future global climate changes [39]. Thus, it is essential to develop standard protocols for seed dormancy-break and germination for seed management in seed banks that guarantee the availability of high-quality seeds for their use in these programs. Further, it is important to identify intraspecific variability in these traits before recommending the use of specific seed sources and if restoration can be made at the species level. In this work, we have generated basic information on seed traits and seed dormancy, and their intraspecific variability, for six native tree species of Chaco forests that can be used for the implementation of ex situ conservation and ecological restoration programs.

4. Conclusions

We documented intra- and interspecific variability in seed traits and seed dormancy and their interactions in six native tree species belonging to the Anacardiaceae, Fabaceae and Rhamnaceae families growing in the seasonally dry Chaco forests of northwestern Argentina. For Fabaceae, two species had ND seeds (G. decorticans and P. visco), whereas seeds of two species (P. praecox and V. aroma) had PY. Seeds of S. mistol (Rhamnaceae) and S. lorentzii (Anacardiaceae) had PD. Thus, seeds of G. decorticans and P. visco can germinate following dispersal if soil moisture is favorable. Germination of P. praecox and V. aroma seeds is delayed until environmental conditions in the habitat, which may include heat from fires, cause the water gap to open, after which the timing of germination depends on the onset of the rainy season. Germination of S. lorentzii and S. mistol seeds is delayed until PD is broken via after-ripening, which can occur during the dry season. Seed dormancy was associated with seed mass but not with MC. Seeds of large-seeded species (G. decorticans, P. visco, S. mistol, S. lorentzii) were ND or had PD, and those of small-seeded species (P. praecox and V. aroma) had PY. Seeds of Fabaceae with relatively high seed mass and thin seed coats were ND, whereas those with low seed mass and thick seed coats had PY. Mechanical and chemical scarification were the most effective methods to break PY, and dry storage was effective in breaking PD.
Species and populations were grouped according to seed mass, MC, seed width and coat thickness, and environmental variables (altitude, latitude, and annual precipitation). Species inhabiting moist habitats (higher AP) had ND, whereas those from dry habitats (higher MAT) had PY or PD. These results suggest that seed traits and seed dormancy are species-specific, and that intraspecific variation in seed traits is likely associated with high phenotypic plasticity of species in response to local environmental heterogeneity. These findings are relevant not only for predicting the current and future natural regeneration of these species under possible scenarios of climate change but also for implementing ex situ conservation, management, and restoration programs urgently required for the persistence of Chaco forests in Argentina.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Studied Species and Seed Collection

The study species were Geoffroea decorticans (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.) Burkart (Fabaceae), Parasenegalia visco (Lorentz ex Griseb.) Seigler and Ebinger (Fabaceae), Parkinsonia praecox (Ruiz and Pav. ex Hook.) Hawkins (Fabaceae), Sarcomphalus mistol (Griseb.) Hauenschild (Rhamnaceae), Schinopsis lorentzii (Griseb.) Engl. (Anacardiaceae) and Vachellia aroma (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.) Seigler & Ebinger (Fabaceae). Fruiting occurs during October–December for G. decorticans, February–April for P. visco, November–March for P. praecox and S. mistol, March–August for S. lorentzii, and February–June for V. aroma. G. decorticans and S. mistol produce fleshy fruits (drupes) dispersed by animals, and S. lorentzii produces dry indehiscent fruits (samaras). P. visco and P. praecox produce dehiscent pods, whereas V. aroma produces indehiscent pods dispersed by animals (Figure 1). P. praecox and V. aroma colonize degraded areas, and presence of V. aroma indicates that fire has occurred in the habitat [47].
During the natural seed dispersal period for each species and population, many mature fruits were collected from at least 10 individuals per species and locality (hereafter population; Table 3). Seeds were cleaned, and if not used in the initial studies they were stored in paper bags at 20 °C and ≤30% relative humidity for 3 months. For G. decorticans, S. mistol, and S. lorentzii all experiments were carried out with fruits (hereafter seeds).

5.2. Seed Traits

Immediately after seed collection for each species and population, we determined seed viability, seed moisture content (MC), seed mass, seed germination percentage, and morpho-anatomical seed traits. Seed viability was evaluated in 4 replicates of 25 seeds each using the tetrazolium chloride (TZ) staining technique [48]. MC (expressed on a fresh weight basis) was determined gravimetrically by drying 3 samples of 10 seeds each at 103 °C for 17 h [48]. Seed mass was determined by weighing 30 fresh seeds individually with a precision balance to 0.0001 mg accuracy (Denver Instrument APX-200). Initial seed germination was evaluated in 4 replicates of 25 seeds per species and population. Seeds were placed in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes on two sheets of filter paper moistened with 5 mL distilled water and incubated in a germination chamber at 25 °C or 30/20 °C under light (8 h light/16 h dark; 30 μmol m–2 s–1, 400–700 nm of cool white fluorescent light) or complete darkness (24 h dark). Darkness was achieved by wrapping dishes in aluminum foil, and germination was recorded once at the end of the experiment. Temperature regimes were selected based on average temperatures occurring in the field during the summer–autumn months, which is the natural germination season [38]. At the end of the germination tests, when no additional germination had occurred in light for 2 weeks, a cut test was conducted to determine the viability of the non-germinated seeds (soft or firm, i.e., dead and viable, respectively), and the total number of viable seeds per replicate was calculated on the basis of the total number of firm non-germinated seeds + the germinated seeds.
The final germination percentage was calculated based on the total number of viable seeds. The time-course cumulative germination curves obtained at different treatments were used to estimate the time required for completion of 50% germination of viable seeds (t50). For this purpose, we fitted the time-course cumulative germination data to the Gompertz equation: Y = C x exp (−exp (−B x (X − M))), where Y is the percent of germination, X is time in days, C is the maximum percent of germination reached by the seed batches (the asymptote of the curve), B is the maximum germination rate standardized by the maximum percent of germination, and M is the value of time, in days, corresponding to the inflection point of the curve (moment at which the maximum rate of germination is reached).
Morpho-anatomical seed traits were evaluated for each species and each population in 10 intact and 10 transversally sectioned seeds that were fixed in FAA for 48 h. After fixation, the seeds were dehydrated in ethanol, critical-point dried with CO2, coated with gold, and observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL JSM-6480 LV). Digital photographs of the hilar–micropyle zone and of cross sections of the seed coat were taken to determine morpho-anatomical traits. Photographs were processed with ImageJ [49] to estimate palisade layer thickness, seed coat thickness, and seed width. The water gap complex was characterized following Gama-Arachchige et al. [14].

5.3. Seed Dormancy

5.3.1. Imbibition Curve

For each species and population, 25 intact and 25 mechanically scarified (seed coat opposite to the micropyle was cut/nicked with a scalpel) seeds were weighed using a digital balance (0.0001 g precision). Seeds were then sown in Petri dishes on two sheets of filter paper moistened with distilled water in light at 25 °C. Seeds were removed from the dishes at 1–2 h intervals for the first 12 h and then every 24 h, blotted dry with filter paper, and reweighed. The weighing procedure was continued until the mass of the seeds remained constant or the mechanically scarified seeds germinated. Water uptake was calculated for intact and scarified seeds as (final weight − initial weight)/initial weight × 100 [48].

5.3.2. Dormancy-Breaking Treatments

The effects of mechanical scarification, dry heat, wet heat, and chemical scarification on dormancy-break and seed germination were evaluated for fresh seeds of P. praecox, V. aroma (both had impermeable seed coats, see imbibition curve results), and for seeds of S. mistol and S. lorentzii (these species had permeable seed coats and low initial germination, see seed traits and imbibition curve results) stored dry for 3 months. The following treatments were tested: (1) mechanical scarification: seed coat opposite the micropyle was nicked with a scalpel; (2) dry heat treatments: seeds were placed in oven at 90 °C for 10, 20, and 30 min; (3) wet heat treatments: seeds were immersed in water at 60, 80, and 100 °C for 2 min; and (4) chemical scarification: seeds were immersed in concentrated sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min. The control was intact seeds that received no pretreatments. For all treatments, 4 replicates of 25 seeds were used, and after each treatment (or control) seeds were then sown in Petri dishes on 2 sheets of filter paper moistened with distilled water and incubated in light at 25 °C. The number of germinated seeds and t50 were determined as previously described. The effects of mechanical scarification, dry heat, wet heat, and chemical scarification on morpho-anatomical changes (e.g., the opening of the water gap by removal or fissure of the lens) in seeds also were evaluated. Ten seeds of each species were submitted to each treatment and then their morpho-anatomical traits were observed as previously described.

5.4. Statistical Analyses

General linear mixed models were used to analyze initial viability, moisture content, seed mass, and morpho-anatomical seed traits, and compare among species or among populations for each species. Variance heterogeneity was considered, and the same information criteria were used to select the best fitted model. The same type of analysis was used to assess the effect of the factors on t50. General linear mixed models for binomial distribution and logit link functions were used to explain variations in number of germinated seeds. As the number of viable seeds was not the same for all experimental units, this number was entered as a covariable. For all analyses, species, scarification, light, and temperature treatment factors were considered as fixed effects. The population factor was considered as fixed when the species were analyzed separately, but since the localities were not the same for each species, this factor was considered to have random effects nested in the species when between-species comparisons were made. In all cases, all factor interactions were included in the models. AIC and BIC information criteria were used to select the most parsimonious model and the residual deviance/degrees of freedom ratio was calculated to assess if the goodness of fit of the model was reasonable and if there was over-dispersion. Treatments with no variance (none or all of the seeds germinated in each replicate) were excluded from the analyses. The post hoc DGC test of multiple comparisons of means was used to locate the differences among factor levels or their combinations of means when the effect of the factor or their interaction was significant (p < 0.05). We explored the associations between seed traits and environmental variables (latitude, longitude, altitude, MAT, AP), evaluating the significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient. Seed lots (of each species x population) were ordered and possible associations between seed characters (MC, seed mass, CT: seed coat thickness, W: seed width, C:W: seed coat thickness: seed width ratio, and C:M: seed coat thickness: seed mass ratio) and the environmental variables were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) on standardized data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G. and T.B.; Methodology, G.G., T.B., D.L.-S., C.A.G. and G.M.; Formal Analysis, T.B. and S.S.; Investigation, G.G. and T.B.; Supervision, G.G.; Project Administration, G.G.; Funding Acquisition, G.G. and G.M.; Writing—original draft, T.B., G.G., D.L.-S., C.A.G. and S.S.; Writing—review and editing, G.G. and C.C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Consejo de Investigación de la Universidad Nacional de Salta (grant number CIUNSa 2491/0) and by the Agencia Nacional para la Promoción Científica y Técnica (grant number PICT 2018-3588).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank María Mercedes Rua for collaborating with us on determination of seed morpho-anatomy, Arydia Filippín for her technical support in the laboratory essays and Cristina Montivero for her contribution to seed collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vallejos, M.; Volante, J.N.; Mosciaro, M.J.; Vale, L.M.; Bustamante, M.L.; Paruelo, J.M. Transformation dynamics of the natural cover in the Dry Chaco ecoregion: A plot level geo-database from 1976 to 2012. J. Arid Environ. 2014, 123, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Volante, J.N.; Alcaraz-Segura, D.; Mosciaro, M.J.; Viglizzo, E.F.; Paruelo, J.M. Ecosystem functional changes associated with land clearing in NW Argentina. Agric. Ecosyste. Environ. 2012, 154, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gold, K.; Way, M. Seed Conservation of the Latinamerican flora–An international opportunity. Royal Botanic Gardens. Lyonia 2004, 6, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kameswara Rao, N.K.; Hanson, J.; Dulloo, M.E.; Ghosh, K.; Nowell, A. Manual of Seed Handling in Genebanks; No.8; Bioversity International: Rome, Italy, 2006; p. 147. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Breaking seed dormancy during dry storage: A useful tool or major problem for successful restoration via direct seeding? Plants 2020, 9, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kildisheva, O.A.; Dixon, K.W.; Silveira, F.A.; Chapman, T.; Di Sacco, A.; Mondoni, A.; Cross, A.T. Dormancy and germination: Making every seed count in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S256–S265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seglias, A.E.; Williams, E.; Bilge, A.; Kramer, A.T. Phylogeny and source climate impact seed dormancy and germination of restoration relevant forb species. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination, 2nd ed.; Elsevier/Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 145–181. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Classification, biogeography, and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. In Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: Richmond, UK, 2003; pp. 518–544. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaganathan, G.K.; Song, D.; Liu, B. Diversity and distribution of physical dormant species in relation to ecosystem and life-forms. Plant Sci. Today 2017, 4, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rubio de Casas, R.; Willis, C.G.; Pearse, W.D.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Cavender-Bares, J. Global biogeography of seed dormancy is determined by seasonality and seed size: A case study in the legumes. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C.; Li, X. Taxonomy, anatomy and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Plant Species Biol. 2000, 15, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gama-Arachchige, N.S.; Baskin, J.M.; Geneve, R.L.; Baskin, C.C. Identification and characterization of ten new water gaps in seeds and fruits with physical dormancy and classification of water-gap complexes. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Anatomy of two mechanisms of breaking physical dormancy by experimental treatments in seeds of two North American Rhus species (Anacardiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1999, 86, 1505–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galíndez, G.; Ortega-Baes, P.; Seal, C.E.; Daws, M.I.; Scopel, A.L.; Pritchard, H.W. Physical seed dormancy in Collaea argentina (Fabaceae) and Abutilon pauciflorum (Malvaceae) after 4 years storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2010, 38, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Galíndez, G.; Ceccato, D.; Malagrina, G.; Pidal, B.; Chilo, G.; Bach, H.; Ortega-Baes, P. Physical seed dormancy in native legume species of Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 2016, 51, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jaganathan, G.K. Influence of maternal environment in developing different levels of physical dormancy and its ecological significance. Plant Ecol. 2015, 217, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodrigues-Junior, A.G.; Mello, A.C.M.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Oliveira, D.M.; Garcia, Q.S. Why large seeds with physical dormancy become nondormant earlier than small ones. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Donohue, K.; Dorn, L.; Griffith, C.; Kim, E.; Aguilera, A.; Polisetty, C.R.; Schmitt, J. Environmental and genetic influences on the germination of Arabidopsis thallana in the field. Evolution 2005, 59, 740–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Renzi, J.P.; Duchoslav, M.; Brus, J.; Hradilová, I.; Pechanec, V.; Václavek, T.; Machalová, J.; Hron, K.; Verdier, J.; Smýkal, P. Physical dormancy release in Medicago truncatula seeds is related to environmental variations. Plants 2020, 9, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fernández-Pascual, E.; Jiménez-Alfaro, B.; Caujapé-Castells, J.; Jaén-Molina, R.; Díaz, T.E. A local dormancy cline is related to the seed maturation environment, population genetic composition and climate. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hay, F.R.; Smith, R.D.; Ellis, R.H.; Butler, L. Developmental changes in the germinability, desiccation tolerance, hardseededness, and longevity of individual seeds of Trifolium ambiguum. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1035–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oyarzabal, M.; Clavijo, J.; Oakley, L.; Biganzoli, F.; Tognetti, P.; Barberis, I.; León, R.J. Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina. Ecol. Austral 2018, 28, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karlin, M.; Karlin, U.O.; Coirini, R.; Contreras, A. Cambio climático en el Chaco Seco. In Proceedings of the Congreso Internacional de Cambio Climático; Publicaciones CCC: Córdoba, Argentina, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morláns, M.C. Regiones naturales de Catamarca: Provincias geológicas y provincias fitogeográficas. Rev. Cienc. Téc. 1995, 2, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  27. Renison, D.; Valladares, G.; Martella, M.B. The effect of passage through the gut of the Greater Rhea (Rhea americana) on germination of tree seeds: Implications for forest restoration. Emu-Aust. Ornithol. 2010, 110, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Funes, G.; Díaz, S.; Venier, P. La temperatura como principal determinante de la germinación en especies del Chaco seco de Argentina. Ecol Austral. 2009, 19, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  29. Paredes, D.A.; Rodriguez Araujo, M.E.; Pérez, D.R. Germinación de tres especies de Fabaceae de interés para la restauración ecológica en el Monte Austral, Patagonia, Argentina. Quebracho 2018, 26, 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodriguez Araujo, M.E.; Pérez, D.; Aronson, J.; Cross, A. Filling gaps on seed germination and species selection in drylands of Argentina: Work in progress and reflections on intelligent tinkering. Multequina 2021, 30, 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  31. Araoz, S.D.; Del Longo, O.T. Tratamientos pregerminativos para romper la dormición física impuesta por el endocarpo en Ziziphus mistol Grisebach. Quebracho 2006, 13, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ibañez Moro, A.V.; Bravo, S.J.; Abdala, N.R.; Borghetti, F.; Chaib, A.M.; Galetto, L. Heat shock effects on germination and seed survival of five woody species from the Chaco region. Flora 2021, 275, 151751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Venier, P.; Funes, G.; García, C.C. Physical dormancy and histological features of seeds of five Acacia species (Fabaceae) from xerophytic forests in central Argentina. Flora 2012, 207, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferreras, A.E.; Zeballos, S.R.; Funes, G. Inter-and intra-population variability in physical dormancy along a precipitation gradient. Acta Bot Bras. 2017, 31, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jaureguiberry, P.; Díaz, S. Post-burning regeneration of the Chaco seasonally dry forest: Germination response of dominant species to experimental heat shock. Oecologia 2015, 177, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Del Longo, O.T.; Aráoz, S.D. Criteria to determine the duration of the germination test for seeds of mistol (Ziziphus mistol Grisebach). Seed Sci. Technol. 2009, 37, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Seed (true seed plus endocarp) dormancy in Anacardiaceae in relation to infrafamilial taxonomy and endocarp anatomy. Seed Sci. Res. 2022, 32, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bertuzzi, T.; Pastrana-Ignes, V.; Curti, R.N.; Batlla, D.; Baskin, C.C.; Sühring, S.; Galíndez, G. Variation in thermal and hydrotime requirements for seed germination of Chaco seasonally dry forest species in relation to population environmental conditions and seed mass. Austral Ecol. 2022, 47, 1232–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saatkamp, A.; Cochrane, A.; Commander, L.; Guja, L.K.; Jimenez-Alfaro, B.; Larson, J.; Nicotra, A.; Poschlod, P.; Silveira, F.A.O.; Cross, A.T.; et al. A research agenda for seed-trait functional ecology. New Phytol. 2018, 221, 1764–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Funes, G.; Venier, P. Dormancy and germination in three Acacia (Fabaceae) species from central Argentina. Seed Sci. Res. 2006, 16, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Mimicking the natural thermal environments experienced by seeds to break physiological dormancy to enhance seed testing and seedling production. Seed Sci. Technol. 2022, 50, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ooi, M.K.; Auld, T.D.; Denham, A.J. Projected soil temperature increase and seed dormancy response along an altitudinal gradient: Implications for seed bank persistence under climate change. Plant Soil 2012, 353, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cochrane, J.A.; Hoyle, G.L.; Yates, C.J.; Wood, J.; Nicotra, A.B. Evidence of population variation in drought tolerance during seed germination in four Banksia (Proteaceae) species from Western Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 2014, 62, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hradilová, I.; Duchoslav, M.; Brus, J.; Pechanec, V.; Hýbl, M.; Kopecký, P.; Smýkal, P. Variation in wild pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) seed dormancy and its relationship to the environment and seed coat traits. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Klupczyńska, E.A.; Pawłowski, T.A. Regulation of seed dormancy and germination mechanisms in a changing environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Berger, J.D.; Shrestha, D.; Ludwig, C. Reproductive strategies in Mediterranean legumes: Trade-offs between phenology, seed size and vigor within and between wild and domesticated Lupinus species collected along aridity gradients. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Demaio, P.; Karlin, U.O.; Medina, M. Árboles Nativos de Argentina. Tomo 3: Noroeste; Ecoval Editorial: Córdoba, Argentina, 2015; p. 410. [Google Scholar]
  48. International Seed Testing Association-ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing; The International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rasband, W.S.; ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1997–2018. Available online: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 1 November 2022).
Plants 12 01790 g001 550
Figure 1. Fruit and seed morphology of Geoffroea decorticans (A), Parasenegalia visco (B), Parkinsonia praecox (C), Sarcomphalus mistol (D), Schinopsis lorentzii (E), and Vachellia aroma (F). Bars = 10 mm.
Figure 1. Fruit and seed morphology of Geoffroea decorticans (A), Parasenegalia visco (B), Parkinsonia praecox (C), Sarcomphalus mistol (D), Schinopsis lorentzii (E), and Vachellia aroma (F). Bars = 10 mm.
Plants 12 01790 g001
Plants 12 01790 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of cross sections of the fruit of Geoffroea decorticans (A), Sarcomphalus mistol (B), and Schinopsis lorentzii (C). Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds of Parasenegalia visco: (D) hilar–micropilar region, (E) cross section, (F) detail of seed coat; Parkinsonia praecox: (G) hilar–micropilar, (H) cross section, (I) detail of seed coat; Vachellia aroma: (J) hilar–micropilar, (K) cross section, (L) detail of seed coat. Abbreviations: emb, embryo; en; endocarp; hg, hourglass cells; loc, locule; pal, palisade layer; par, sclerified parenchyma; pe, pericarp; sc: seed coat. Black arrows: light-line, white arrows: lens. Bars with dotted lines represent measured traits: ct, coat thickness; pt, palisade layer thickness; sw, seed width.
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of cross sections of the fruit of Geoffroea decorticans (A), Sarcomphalus mistol (B), and Schinopsis lorentzii (C). Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds of Parasenegalia visco: (D) hilar–micropilar region, (E) cross section, (F) detail of seed coat; Parkinsonia praecox: (G) hilar–micropilar, (H) cross section, (I) detail of seed coat; Vachellia aroma: (J) hilar–micropilar, (K) cross section, (L) detail of seed coat. Abbreviations: emb, embryo; en; endocarp; hg, hourglass cells; loc, locule; pal, palisade layer; par, sclerified parenchyma; pe, pericarp; sc: seed coat. Black arrows: light-line, white arrows: lens. Bars with dotted lines represent measured traits: ct, coat thickness; pt, palisade layer thickness; sw, seed width.
Plants 12 01790 g002
Plants 12 01790 g003 550
Figure 3. Seed germination (%) of (A) Parkinsonia praecox: Pomancillo Oeste (white bars), Recreo (grey bars), and Santa Cruz (black bars); (B) Vachellia aroma: Capital (white bars), Colonia del Valle (grey bars), and Pomancillo Oeste (black bars); (C) Sarcomphalus mistol: Huaycama (white bars), Pomancillo Oeste (grey bars), and Recreo (black bars); and (D) Schinopsis lorentzii: El Portezuelo (white bars), La Quebrada (grey bars), and Santo Domingo (black bars). Treatments: mechanical scarification (MS), dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90 °C for 10, 20, and 30 min; DH10, DH20, DH30), wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C; WH60, WH80, WH100), chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min; Ch10, Ch20, Ch30) and intact seeds (I). Values with different letters indicate significant differences between populations and treatments included in the analyses (DGC test p < 0.05). Data are the means of 4 replicates (+1 standard error).
Figure 3. Seed germination (%) of (A) Parkinsonia praecox: Pomancillo Oeste (white bars), Recreo (grey bars), and Santa Cruz (black bars); (B) Vachellia aroma: Capital (white bars), Colonia del Valle (grey bars), and Pomancillo Oeste (black bars); (C) Sarcomphalus mistol: Huaycama (white bars), Pomancillo Oeste (grey bars), and Recreo (black bars); and (D) Schinopsis lorentzii: El Portezuelo (white bars), La Quebrada (grey bars), and Santo Domingo (black bars). Treatments: mechanical scarification (MS), dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90 °C for 10, 20, and 30 min; DH10, DH20, DH30), wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C; WH60, WH80, WH100), chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min; Ch10, Ch20, Ch30) and intact seeds (I). Values with different letters indicate significant differences between populations and treatments included in the analyses (DGC test p < 0.05). Data are the means of 4 replicates (+1 standard error).
Plants 12 01790 g003
Plants 12 01790 g004 550
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds after dormancy-breaking treatments for Parkinsonia praecox: (A–C): chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively); (D–F): wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C, respectively); (G–I): dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90° for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively). White arrows indicate the lens (water gap).
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds after dormancy-breaking treatments for Parkinsonia praecox: (A–C): chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively); (D–F): wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C, respectively); (G–I): dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90° for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively). White arrows indicate the lens (water gap).
Plants 12 01790 g004
Plants 12 01790 g005 550
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds after dormancy-breaking treatments for Vachellia aroma: (A–C): chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively); (D–F): wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C, respectively); (G–I): dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90° for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively). White arrows indicate the lens (water gap).
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrographs of water gap region of seeds after dormancy-breaking treatments for Vachellia aroma: (A–C): chemical scarification (seeds immersed in sulfuric acid for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively); (D–F): wet heat (seeds immersed in water for 2 min at 60, 80, and 100 °C, respectively); (G–I): dry heat (seeds placed in oven at 90° for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively). White arrows indicate the lens (water gap).
Plants 12 01790 g005
Plants 12 01790 g006 550
Figure 6. Ordination of species and populations on the first two principal components of the principal component analysis (PCA) based on seed traits (MC, seed mass, W, CT, C:W, C:M), environmental variables (latitude, longitude, altitude, MAT, AP) and seed dormancy (ND: blue, PY: magenta, PD: yellow). Abbreviations: Ch: Chacabuco, Hu: Huaycama, PO: Pomancillo Oeste, Co: Concepción, LP: La Puerta, LT: Los Túneles, PE: Pomenacillo Este, Re: Recreo, SC: Santa Cruz, EP: El Portezuelo, LQ: La Quebrada, SD: Santo Domingo, Ca: Capital, and CV: Colonia del Valle.
Figure 6. Ordination of species and populations on the first two principal components of the principal component analysis (PCA) based on seed traits (MC, seed mass, W, CT, C:W, C:M), environmental variables (latitude, longitude, altitude, MAT, AP) and seed dormancy (ND: blue, PY: magenta, PD: yellow). Abbreviations: Ch: Chacabuco, Hu: Huaycama, PO: Pomancillo Oeste, Co: Concepción, LP: La Puerta, LT: Los Túneles, PE: Pomenacillo Este, Re: Recreo, SC: Santa Cruz, EP: El Portezuelo, LQ: La Quebrada, SD: Santo Domingo, Ca: Capital, and CV: Colonia del Valle.
Plants 12 01790 g006
Plants 12 01790 g007 550
Figure 7. Model showing seed dormancy-break and germination of the six study species in the field. ND, nondormant; PD, physiological dormancy; and PY, physical dormancy.
Figure 7. Model showing seed dormancy-break and germination of the six study species in the field. ND, nondormant; PD, physiological dormancy; and PY, physical dormancy.
Plants 12 01790 g007
Table
Table 1. Mean and (standard deviation) of moisture content (MC; % fresh weight basis), seed mass, germination (%) in light and darkness at 25 and 30/20 °C, and water uptake (% initial mass basis) for each species and population.
Table 1. Mean and (standard deviation) of moisture content (MC; % fresh weight basis), seed mass, germination (%) in light and darkness at 25 and 30/20 °C, and water uptake (% initial mass basis) for each species and population.
SpeciesPopulationMC (%) Seed Mass (mg) Germination (%) Water Uptake (%)
Light Darkness IntactScarified
25 °C30/20 °C25 °C30/20 °C
Geoffroea decorticansChacabuco5.4 (0.3) Ca1005.2 (355) Aa16 (9) Cc7 (8) Cb83 (17) Ca77 (32) Ca71.2 (30) Ba63.9 (12) Ba
Huaycama5.7 (0.5) Ca909.3 (115) Aa12 (5) Bc74 (28) Bb78 (19) Ba61 (41) Ba76.5 (37) Ba63.3 (11) Ba
Pomancillo Oeste6.3 (0.1) Ca700.9 (246) Ab36 (18) Ac52 (31) Ab98 (5) Aa10085.7 (16) Aa80.4 (19) Aa
Parasenegalia viscoConcepción8.9 (0.2) Ab111.3 (18) Ca100100100100233.4 (32) Ba223.0 (54) Aa
La Puerta9.5 (0.04) Aa99.0 (15) Cb10099 (3) 100100195.6 (193) Ca252.6 (45) Aa
Los Túneles9.4 (0.3) Aa101.8 (18) Cb10099 (3) 100100276.4 (46) Aa232.1 (38) Ab
Parkinsonia praecoxPomancillo Este8.7 (0.2) Aa46.5 (5) Da44 (6) Aa50 (20) Aa38 (8) Ab26 (7) Ab64.2 (77) Ab150.2 (17) Aa
Recreo9.0 (0.2) Aa42.5 (7) Da35 (10) Aa42 (14) Aa32 (17) Ab34 (15) Ab56.8 (86) Ab150.3 (36) Aa
Santa Cruz8.7 (0.1) Aa46.2 (9) Da47 (5) Aa46 (15) Aa34 (6) Ab24 (18) Ab46.6 (72) Ab144.1 (39) Aa
Sarcomphalus mistolHuaycama8.4 (0.1) Ba234.4 (38) Ba48 (7) Aa48 (8) Aa13 (18) Ab12 (13) Ab28.5 (5) Aa29.1 (3) Aa
Pomancillo Oeste7.6 (0.1) Bc233.7 (37) Ba4 (4) Ca2(3) Ca0019.1 (3) Ba19.7 (9) Ba
Recreo7.8 (0.05) Bb176.9 (31) Bb28 (18) Ba29 (18) Ba5 (6) Bb8 (7) Bb26.5 (3) Aa29.7 (6) Aa
Schinopsis lorentziiEl Portezuelo8.6 (0.1) Aa 118.8 (24) Ca37 (26) Ba40 (33) Bb26 (13) Ba25 (24) Bb76.5 (17) Aa67.9 (11) Ab
La Quebrada 8.5 (0.1) Aa128.2 (30) Ca55 (13) Aa41 (9) Ab43 (7) Aa39 (33) Ab78.2 (23) Aa77.6 (18) Aa
Santo Domingo 8.7 (0.1) Aa117.1 (27) Ca24 (13) Ca10 (4) Cb15 (15) Ca9 (4) Cb61.4 (9) Ba49.6 (9) Bb
VachelliaCapital 8.8 (0.1) Aa61.2 (7) Da8 (1) Ba4 (5) Ba8 (7) Ba4 (5) Ba18.0 (47) Ba152.8 (20) Ab
aromaColonia del Valle8.2 (0.2) Ab83.6 (10) Db10 (3) Ba9 (3) Ba8 (7) Ba5 (4) Ba2.9 (5) Ba167.0 (49) Ab
Pomancillo Oeste9.3 (0.4) Aa66.7 (17) Da14 (6) Aa14 (4) Aa15 (18) Aa6 (8) Aa53.1 (82) Aa124.2 (22) Bb
For seed MC and seed mass, values with different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between species and values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between populations of each species. For seed germination and water uptake, values with different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between populations and values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments included in the analyses (DGC test p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Mean and (standard deviation) of morpho-anatomical seed traits: palisade layer thickness (P), seed coat thickness (CT), seed width (W), coat thickness: seed width ratio (C:W) and coat thickness: seed mass ratio (C:M), for each species and population.
Table 2. Mean and (standard deviation) of morpho-anatomical seed traits: palisade layer thickness (P), seed coat thickness (CT), seed width (W), coat thickness: seed width ratio (C:W) and coat thickness: seed mass ratio (C:M), for each species and population.
SpeciesPopulationPl (mm)CT (mm)W (mm)C:WC:M
Geoffroea decorticansChacabuco-4.21 (0.6) Aa14.69 (2.8) Aa0.29 (0.02) Ca0.004 (0.0003) Da
Huaycama-3.87 (0.1) Aa13.15 (0.6) Aa0.29 (0.01) Ca0.004 (0.001) Da
Pomancillo Oeste-2.49 (0.5) Ab10.09 (1.5) Aa0.24 (0.01) Cb0.003 (0.001) Da
Parasenegalia viscoConcepción0.036 (0.01) Ca0.14 (0.02) Fa1.54 (0.3) Da0.09 (0.01) Eb0.001(0.0003) Ea
La Puerta0.029 (0.005) Ca0.11 (0.03) Fa1.46 (0.3) Da0.08 (0.01) Eb0.001 (0.0003) Ea
Los Túneles0.030 (0.004) Ca0.14 (0.02) Fa1.19 (0.1) Da0.12 (0.03) Ea0.001 (0.0002) Ea
Parkinsonia praecoxPomancillo Este0.063 (0.005) Ba0.32 (0.04) Ea1.47 (0.3) Da0.23 (0.05) Cb0.007 (0.001) Ba
Recreo0.061 (0.003) Ba0.34 (0.05) Ea1.25 (0.2) Da0.28 (0.02) Ca0.008 (0.002) Ba
Santa Cruz0.063 (0.01) Ba0.40 (0.07) Ea1.48 (0.2) Da0.27 (0.01) Ca0.009 (0.002) Ba
Sarcomphalus mistolHuaycama-1.15 (0.03) Ca3.72 (0.05) Ba0.31 (0.01) Bb0.005 (0.001) Ca
Pomancillo Oeste-1.13 (0.1) Ca3.32 (0.3) Ba0.34 (0.02) Ba0.004 (0.001) Ca
Recreo-1.29 (0.009) Ca3.62 (0.1) Ba0.36 (0.01) Ba0.007 (0.0003) Ca
Schinopsis lorentziiEl Portezuelo-1.59 (0.4) Ba3.99 (0.9) Ba0.40 (0.03) Aa0.014 (0.004) Aa
La Quebrada -1.4 (0.3) Ba3.54 (0.6) Ba0.40 (0.02) Aa0.010 (0.003) Aa
Santo Domingo -1.46 (0.2) Ba3.52 (0.5) Ba0.42 (0.03) Aa0.013 (0.003) Aa
Vachellia aromaCapital 0.153 (0.03) Aa0.47 (0.1) Da2.62 (0.4) Ca0.18 (0.03) Da0.008 (0.003) Ba
Colonia del Valle0.097 (0.02) Ab0.44 (0.09) Da2.55 (0.4) Ca0.17 (0.05) Da0.004 (0.0005) Ba
Pomancillo Oeste0.106 (0.01) Ab0.46 (0.04) Da2.77 (0.4) Ca0.17 (0.01) Da0.007 (0.002) Ba
Values with different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between species and values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between populations of each species (DGC test p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Vegetation units and environmental variables (latitude; longitude; altitude; MAT, mean annual temperature; and AP, annual precipitation) for each species and population. Climatic data were extracted from WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html; accessed on 1 November 2022). Population names correspond to the localities where seeds were collected in Catamarca Province, Argentina.
Table 3. Vegetation units and environmental variables (latitude; longitude; altitude; MAT, mean annual temperature; and AP, annual precipitation) for each species and population. Climatic data were extracted from WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html; accessed on 1 November 2022). Population names correspond to the localities where seeds were collected in Catamarca Province, Argentina.
Species (Family)PopulationVegetation UnitLatitudeLongitudeAltitude (m a.s.l.)MAT (°C)AP (mm)
Geoffroea decorticans
(Fabaceae)		ChacabucoArid Chaco−28°26′−65°43′52520.1529
HuaycamaArid Chaco−28°30′−65°39′57819.0529
Pomancillo OesteChaco Serrano−28°18′−65°43′64819.4545
Parasenegalia visco
(Fabaceae)		ConcepciónChaco Serrano−28°40′−66°04′88118.7441
La PuertaChaco Serrano−28°11′−65°46′88018.2547
Los TúnelesChaco Serrano−28°08′−65°38′95518.3613
Parkinsonia praecox
(Fabaceae)		Pomancillo EsteChaco Serrano−28°18′−65°42′67719.4545
Recreo Semiarid Chaco−29°05′−65°4′24320.5491
Santa CruzArid Chaco−28°29′−65°40′56620.1530
Sarcomphalus mistol
(Rhamnaceae)		HuaycamaArid Chaco−28°31′−65°41′53820.1524
Pomancillo OesteChaco Serrano−28°18′−65°43′64619.4545
RecreoSemiarid Chaco−29°08′−65°05′23520.6483
Schinopsis lorentzii
(Anacardiaceae)		El PortezueloChaco Serrano−28°27′−65°36′76018.5553
La QuebradaChaco Serrano−28°27′−65°51′88719.2502
Santo DomingoSemiarid Chaco−29°09′−65°12′25420.5483
Vachellia aroma
(Fabaceae)		CapitalArid Chaco−28°26′−65°45′53920.1529
Colonia del ValleArid Chaco−28°38′−65°54′47620.2494
Pomancillo OesteChaco Serrano−28°18′−65°43′65319.4545
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bertuzzi, T.; López-Spahr, D.; Gómez, C.A.; Sühring, S.; Malagrina, G.; Baskin, C.C.; Galíndez, G. Variation in Seed Dormancy of Chaco Seasonally Dry Forest Species: Effects of Seed Traits and Population Environmental Conditions. Plants 2023, 12, 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091790

AMA Style

Bertuzzi T, López-Spahr D, Gómez CA, Sühring S, Malagrina G, Baskin CC, Galíndez G. Variation in Seed Dormancy of Chaco Seasonally Dry Forest Species: Effects of Seed Traits and Population Environmental Conditions. Plants. 2023; 12(9):1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091790

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bertuzzi, Tania, Diego López-Spahr, Carlos A. Gómez, Silvia Sühring, Gisela Malagrina, Carol C. Baskin, and Guadalupe Galíndez. 2023. "Variation in Seed Dormancy of Chaco Seasonally Dry Forest Species: Effects of Seed Traits and Population Environmental Conditions" Plants 12, no. 9: 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091790

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop