Next Article in Journal
Morphological and Anatomical Analysis of the Internodes of a New Dwarf Variant of Moso Bamboo, Phyllostachys edulis f. exaurita
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Sagittaria trifolia L. to Phytotoxic Ethyl Acetate Fungal Extract from Curvularia lunata Strain CLST-01
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Compendium for Novel Marker-Based Breeding Strategies in Eggplant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) in China

1
College of Life and Environmental Science, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement and Quality Control of Medicinal Plants, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
3
Orient Science & Technology College, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(9), 1755; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091755
Submission received: 24 March 2023 / Revised: 14 April 2023 / Accepted: 21 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solanaceae Genetic Resources: Genomics, Phenomics and Breeding)

Abstract

:
Cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.), an annual plant containing a variety of active ingredients, has great medicinal value. However, studies on the genetic diversity and population structure of P. angulata are limited. In this study, we developed chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers and applied them to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure of P. angulata. A total of 57 cpSSRs were identified from the chloroplast genome of P. angulata. Among all cpSSR loci, mononucleotide markers were the most abundant (68.24%), followed by tetranucleotide (12.28%), dinucleotide (10.53%), and trinucleotide (8.77%) markers. In total, 30 newly developed cpSSR markers with rich polymorphism and good stability were selected for further genetic diversity and population structure analyses. These cpSSRs amplified a total of 156 alleles, 132 (84.62%) of which were polymorphic. The percentage of polymorphic alleles and the average polymorphic information content (PIC) value of the cpSSRs were 81.29% and 0.830, respectively. Population genetic diversity analysis indicated that the average observed number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (He), Nei’s gene diversity (h), and Shannon information indices (I) of 16 P. angulata populations were 1.3161, 1.1754, 0.1023, and 0.1538, respectively. Moreover, unweighted group arithmetic mean, neighbor-joining, principal coordinate, and STRUCTURE analyses indicated that 203 P. angulata individuals from 16 populations were grouped into four clusters. A molecular variance analysis (AMOVA) illustrated the considerable genetic variation among populations, while the gene flow (Nm) value (0.2324) indicated a low level of gene flow among populations. Our study not only provided a batch of efficient genetic markers for research on P. angulata but also laid an important foundation for the protection and genetic breeding of P. angulata resources.

1. Introduction

Cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) is an important annual herbaceous plant from the Solanaceae family, mainly distributed in China, Japan, India, Australia, and the Americas [1,2]. P. angulata has high potential medicinal value and a very long history of being used in traditional medicines around the world. Recent phytochemical and pharmacological studies have confirmed that P. angulata is rich in vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and many important pharmacologically active constituents, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer ingredients [3,4,5,6]. In many countries, such as China, Indonesia, Peru, Mexico, and Brazil, P. angulata is often used to treat a variety of illnesses, including dermatitis, tracheitis, impaludism, rheumatism, hepatitis, and analogous conditions [7,8,9,10]. Recently, increasing attention has been paid to the phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of P. angulata, and a variety of bioactive steroids with antitumor activities, including physagulins (A−Q), physangulidines (A−C), withangulatins (A−I), physalins (B, D, F−H), and withaminimin, have been isolated from the species [4,5,11]. Due to their important medicinal value, P. angulata plants have been widely cultivated in some regions of China for decades.
Genetic research to determine genetic diversity and population dynamics can be invaluable when forming and revising a species management plan, as maintaining diversity is critical for conservation [12,13,14]. Information about genetic structure is essential to understanding the scales over which dispersal, genetic drift, and selection operate in populations [15]. The design of microsatellite (simple sequence repeat, SSR) markers is based on conserved nucleotide sequences on both sides of simple repeat sequences, and the polymorphism among alleles is reflected by detecting the difference in the number of repeats [16]. SSRs are widely distributed in the nuclear and organellar genomes of eukaryotes [17,18,19,20]. SSR markers are considered to be among the most ideal molecular markers for the study of plant genetics [14,18]. Chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSRs) are widely distributed in the chloroplast genomes of plants. CpSSR markers not only have the advantages of co-dominance, high polymorphism, and multi-allelic loci, but also have the characteristics of a slow evolution rate, low molecular weight, relative conservation, simple structure, and single-parent inheritance [21]. In recent years, cpSSR markers have been widely used in plant phylogeography [22], species identification [21], phylogeny [23], and genetic diversity and population structure studies [24].
To date, several molecular marker techniques, including the use of SSRs, ISSRs, InDels, and SNP markers, have been used to analyze the genetic diversity of some Physalis species, including P. peruviana, P. philadelphica, and P. floridana [25,26,27,28]. Until recently, however, no cpSSR markers have been developed within the genus Physalis, and there are no reports of cpSSR marker usage for P. angulata. Moreover, there have been no published molecular marker-based studies of genetic diversity in P. angulata populations with a large number of samples. Although P. angulata has many important applications, researchers and plant breeders have not given enough attention to its conservation and improvement. Consequently, the production, utilization, and improvement of P. angulata are severely restricted.
Hence, this study was initiated with the aim of developing cpSSR markers to evaluate the genetic diversity and population structure in P. angulata germplasm collections in China. The findings can eventually serve as an important basis for the genetic improvement and sustainable conservation of P. angulata resources.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of the Developed cpSSR Markers

In total, 57 cpSSR motifs (including three complex SSR types) were detected in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata, most of which were single-base repetitions dominated by A and T (Table 1 and Table 2). Information about the 57 SSR motifs is shown in Table S1. Among all detected SSR loci, mononucleotides were the most abundant, with 39 loci (68.24% of the total). This was followed by tetranucleotides, with seven loci (12.28% of the total), dinucleotides, with six loci (10.53% of the total), and trinucleotides, with five loci (8.77% of the total) (Table 1). Of the mononucleotide motifs, T (24 of 39, 61.54%) was the most abundant, followed by A (14 out of 39, 35.90%). The C motif was the least frequently observed (one of 39, 0.26%) mononucleotide. The dinucleotide motifs were mainly AT and TA, each accounting for 50%, respectively. Trinucleotide motifs included AAG, ACT, TAA, TTA, and TTC, accounting for 20% each, respectively. Of the tetranucleotide motifs, TTTA (28.57%) and TTTG (28.57%) were the most abundant, followed by AAAC (14.29%), CTAT (14.29%), and CTTA (14.29%) (Table 2 and Figure 1). The average lengths (bp) of the mononucleotide, dinucleotide, trinucleotide, and tetranucleotide cpSSRs were 12.04, 10.67, 11.6 and 12, respectively (Table S1). Additionally, 39 SSR motifs (68.42%) had repeat numbers greater than or equal to 10 (Table 2 and Figure 1).
In this study, 54 cpSSR primer pairs were developed and designed on the basis of the 57 cpSSR motifs detected in the P. angulata chloroplast genome using Primer Premier 5 with manual correction (Table S2). The amplification segments of these cpSSR primer pairs were distributed in four regions (LSC, SSC, IRA, and IRB) of the P. angulata chloroplast genome. Among them, 41 were distributed in the LSC region, along with five in the SSC region, four in the IRA region, and four in the IRB region. Through screening the 54 cpSSR primer pairs with six P. angulata genomic DNA samples, a total of 30 cpSSR primer pairs (55.6%) with good stability, high polymorphism, and clear electrophoresis bands were chosen for further genetic diversity analyses of the P. angulata populations (Table 3).

2.2. CpSSR Analysis

A total of 156 alleles were amplified by the 30 cpSSR primer pairs, with a range of two (KzcpSSR19, KzcpSSR21, KzcpSSR25, KzcpSSR37, KzcpSSR38, KzcpSSR39, and KzcpSSR53) to 12 (KzcpSSR04), and an average of 5.2 bands per primer pair (Table 3). The actual lengths of the amplified products ranged from 100 to 300 bp. Overall, 132 of the 156 amplified alleles were polymorphic, accounting for 84.62%, with an average of 4.4 alleles per pair of primers. The percentage of polymorphic alleles across the primer pairs ranged from 25.0% to 100.0%, with an average of 81.29%. The PIC value of each primer pair ranged from 0.550 to 0.945, with an average of 0.830 (PIC > 0.500). This indicates that these alleles contain abundant genetic information and can be used to study the genetic diversity and genetic structure of P. angulata populations.

2.3. Genetic Diversity Analysis

The genetic diversity of the 16 P. angulata populations (n = 203) was evaluated, revealing high mean per population estimates of allele and genetic diversity (Na = 1.3161, Ne = 1.1754, h = 0.1023, and I = 0.1538; see Table 4). The PL of the 16 P. angulata populations ranged from 10 (DQ) to 85 (YN and XS), with an average of 49, while the PPL ranged from 6.41% (DQ) to 54.49% (YN and XS), with an average of 31.61%. The Na per population ranged from 1.0641 (DQ) to 1.5449 (XS and YN), with an average of 1.3161. The Ne across the 16 populations ranged from 1.0371 (DQ) to 1.2984 (XS), with a mean of 1.1754. The I per population ranged from 0.0325 (DQ) to 0.2640 (XS), with an average of 0.1538. At the population level, the PPL, Na, Ne, and I values were the highest in the XS population, indicating that this population had the highest level of genetic diversity. The 16 populations were ranked by genetic diversity as follows: XS > YN > WZ > XJ > PJ > HG > JJ > NJZ > YW > TZ > LA > NH > LH > NJX > HZ > DQ.

2.4. Genetic Differentiation and Gene Flow

Nei’s genetic distance, calculated on the basis of a pairwise comparison, ranged from 0.0329 (between DQ and YW) to 0.8268 (between NH and NJX), with an average of 0.3401. The majority of Nei’s genetic identity ranged from 0.4374 (between NH and NJX) to 0.9677 (between TZ and LH), with an average of 0.7386 (Table 5). A Mantel test conducted to assess the correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance among the populations of P. angulata revealed no significant correlation (r = −0.176, p = 0.055).
At the species level, the Ht of the P. angulata population was 0.3224, the Hs was 0.1023, and the Gst was 0.6827 (Table 6). The results indicated that 68.27% of the genetic variation occurred between P. angulata populations, and 31.73% of the genetic variation occurred within P. angulata populations. The Nm of P. angulata populations was 0.2324, indicating that there was a low level of gene exchange between them. Furthermore, an AMOVA was performed to assess the molecular variations among P. angulata populations (Table 7). The results of the AMOVA revealed that 29% of total molecular variations were contributed by differences within populations, while the remaining 71% of total molecular variations were due to differences among populations. Population differentiation (PhiPT = 0.706) was significant (p = 0.001), which was consistent with the results from the analysis of Nei’s genetic diversity, indicating that the genetic differentiation between populations was higher than that within populations.

2.5. Genetic Relationships

The UPGMA dendrogram of P. angulata populations was constructed on the basis of Nei’s genetic distance, which is an accurate reflection of the genetic relationships among populations. The UPGMA tree showed that the 16 populations could be divided into four major clusters (Clusters I, II, III, and IV) (Figure 2). Cluster I contained six populations, namely, HZ, LA, LH, TZ, DQ, and YW. Cluster II included four populations, namely, NJX, XJ, HG, and YN, while population JJ formed a separate cluster (Cluster III). The XS, PJ, NH, WZ, and NJZ populations were separated from the others and collectively grouped into Cluster IV.
To verify the results of the UPGMA analysis, an NJ tree of the 203 individuals was constructed on the basis of genetic distance (Figure 3). The results of the NJ tree analysis showed that the 203 P. angulata individuals were grouped into four distinct clusters, consistent with the results of the UPGMA analysis. The findings indicated that most of the individuals from the same population clustered together, but there were also a few individuals from the same population who grouped separately into different clusters. For example, almost all individuals in the XJ population were grouped into Cluster I, and the remaining individuals were grouped into Cluster II and Cluster III (Figure 3). Similar results were also observed in the JJ, YN, and NJX populations.
PCoAs, based on the genetic distance matrix, were then performed to more intuitively understand the genetic relationship among the 203 samples and 16 populations of P. angulata (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The percentage variance among the 203 samples attributable to the first two principal coordinate axes explained 35.04% and 14.55% of the molecular variance (Figure 4). Meanwhile, the percentage variance among the 16 populations attributable to the first three principal coordinate axes explained 76.67%, 5.95%, and 3.26% of the total molecular variance (Figure 5). Interestingly, the results of the two-dimensional PCoA among 203 samples and three-dimensional PCoA among 16 populations were consistent with the results of the UPGMA and NJ clustered tree analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3). All the samples of P. angulata from 16 populations were classified into four groups.

2.6. Population Structure

Population structure analysis was employed to rebuild the genetic relationship among the 16 P. angulata populations using the newly developed cpSSR markers. The results of the Structure Harvester analysis showed that the most likely value of K in the Bayesian clustering analysis was four (Figure 6A), indicating the presence of four main groups within the 16 P. angulata populations. The results of the Bayesian clustering analysis using STRUCTURE software (Figure 6B) confirmed the results obtained from the UPGMA dendrogram, NJ tree, and PCoA. The first cluster (yellow color) contained the HZ, LA, DQ, YW, LH, and TZ populations. The second cluster (red color) consisted of the XS, PJ, NH, WZ, and NJZ populations. The JJ population alone was placed into the third cluster (green color), while the NJX, HG, XJ, and YN populations were placed into the fourth cluster (blue color). Samples from the same population tended to be concentrated together, indicating that the genetic relationship between samples within a population was closer than the genetic relationship between populations. However, the results also showed that some individuals were crossed and overlapped among the populations, which indicates that there was some gene exchange and mutual penetration among the populations.

3. Discussion

SSR markers are popular tools for use in DNA marker technology and are extensively applied to the analysis of genetic diversity in plant populations. As a type of SSR marker, cpSSRs have the characteristics of high mutability and high conservation of chloroplast genome sequences. CpSSR markers are simple, efficient, and easy to operate, and they can reveal a high level of population diversity. CpSSRs have been used successfully to reveal genetic diversity among many plants [29,30,31,32]. However, to date, there have been no studies related to P. angulata SSR development, and no DNA marker technique has been employed to analyze the genetic diversity among P. angulata populations. In the present study, we developed a batch of SSR markers and used them to study the genetic diversity among P. angulata populations.
Mononucleotides (68.24% of the total) were the most common SSR loci detected in our study, followed by tetranucleotides (12.28% of the total). These proportions are similar to those of cpSSR marker types found in many plants [33,34,35]. Polymorphism is an important index for evaluating the application value of molecular markers in the study of plant genetic diversity [18,30,36]. The cpSSR markers developed in our study yielded reproducible polymorphic alleles in 203 samples from 16 P. angulata populations. This indicates that these cpSSR markers can be used as a reliable molecular tool for studying genetic diversity and population structure in P. angulata.
A total of 30 out of 54 cpSSR markers amplified electrophoretic bands with high levels of polymorphism, good stability, and high resolution in P. angulata populations, accounting for 55.56% of the newly developed markers. The polymorphic ratio of the cpSSR markers ranged from 25% to 100%, with an average of 81.29%, which was higher than the polymorphic ratios detected by SSR of 73.5% among Dendrocalamus hamiltonii [37], and 53.8% among celery cultivars [38]. The PIC values ranged between 0.550 and 0.945, with an average of 0.830, indicating that the cpSSR markers had good polymorphism and could be used to assess genetic diversity in P. angulata populations.
Genetic diversity is the sum of genetic information in a population, which is necessary for population persistence, adaptation, and evolution [36,39]. The interaction of drift, migration, mutation, and selection is the main factor causing genetic diversity in natural populations [14,40]. Using cpSSR markers, our study indicated that there is considerable genetic diversity among P. angulate populations (Na = 1.3161, Ne = 1.1754, h = 0.1023, and I = 0.1538). The proportion of polymorphism among P. angulata populations ranged from 6.41% to 54.49%, indicating that there were significant differences in polymorphic loci among populations. Furthermore, the XS population showed greater genetic diversity than the other 15 populations. Correspondingly, the complexity of genetic diversity was as follows: XS > YN > WZ > XJ > PJ > HG > JJ > NJZ > YW > TZ > LA > NH > LH > NJX > HZ > DQ. Compared to other populations, the DQ population from Deqing, Zhejiang Province had the lowest level of genetic diversity, with the smallest number of polymorphic loci, i.e., the lowest Na and Ne values. The reason for the lowest genetic diversity in the DQ population is probably because it contains a limited number of individuals adapted to specific habitats due to their isolation from other populations. Therefore, to more accurately evaluate the genetic diversity of this population in the future, more samples will be required. The average h and I values among the P. angulata populations were 0.1023 and 0.1538, respectively (<0.5), similar to those of P. philadelphica and P. peruviana [27,28,41,42]. The scattered and narrow distribution ranges, as well as small population sizes and large spatial distances between populations, limit pollination between populations, leading to self- and inbreeding. All of these factors may contribute to low genetic diversity.
Gene flow, negatively correlated with the genetic differentiation coefficient, is a basic microevolutionary phenomenon that often hinders genetic differentiation between populations and affects the maintenance of genetic diversity [14,43,44]. In our study, the level of gene flow among P. angulata populations was low (Nm = 0.2324), similar to that found in P. philadelphica, P. peruviana, and M. savatieri [28,41,45]. The main reasons for the low degree of genetic differentiation of among P. angulata populations may be related to the genetic mode and the dispersal distance of the seeds and pollen. The Ht value of P. angulata (0.3224) was higher than that of P. philadelphica (Ht = 0.292) [41]. The Gst value of 0.6827 for P. angulata indicates that 68.27% of the genetic variation occurred among populations, while 31.73% of the genetic variation occurred within populations. This is a similar result to that observed in Rhodiola alsia [46]. The AMOVA results also supported population differentiation, which indicated that the major genetic variance occurred among populations rather than within populations.
The population genetic structure reveals the distribution pattern of genetic diversity within and among populations [14,39,47]. Three methods, UPGMA and NJ clustering, PCoA, and Structure analysis, were combined to detect the genetic diversity and population structure in P. angulata. Many studies have reported a correlation between genetic distance and geographical location in the populations of certain plants [30,39,45,47]. Similar results were also obtained in our study. The UPGMA and NJ results both indicated that the six populations from the Zhejiang region (HZ, LA, LH, TZ, DQ, and YW) were jointly grouped into one cluster. These six populations were geographically close, especially the LH and TZ populations, and the genetic distance between them was also the smallest. The populations that were geographically distant from Zhejiang, such as the NJX, XJ, HG, and YN populations, were clustered together, while the JJ population from Jiangxi was clustered separately. These results indicated that the genetic distance between the P. angulata populations from these provinces and those from Zhejiang Province was relatively large, and the level of gene flow was very low. Interestingly, some populations did not show a clear correlation with geographical location. For example, the NJZ population from Jiangsu Province and four populations (XS, PJ, NH, and WZ) from Zhejiang Province were clustered together, although they were geographically distant. In our previous investigation of morphological phenotypic traits, we found that the plant height in these five populations was higher than that in the other populations. This might explain why they clustered together. Our study showed that the genetic diversity of P. angulata was not only related to geographical location but also likely associated with the geographical environment, human selection, and other factors. Furthermore, the PCoA and Structure analysis results were identical, and both supported the results of the UPGMA and NJ trees analyses. In a future study, more P. angulata population samples and more genome-wide molecular markers (such as SNPs, nSSRs, AFLPs, and others) will be used to more comprehensively evaluate the genetic diversity and structure of P. angulata populations.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and DNA Extraction

In total, 203 samples of wild P. angulata representing 16 populations were randomly collected from their main areas of distribution in China (Table 8, Figure 7). The identity of the samples was confirmed by reference to the species description provided in the herbarium at the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (http://www.cvh.ac.cn/; accessed on 15 June 2021). The collected samples were planted during the regular crop growing season (early May) in 2018 at the field site of the Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement and Quality Control of Medicinal Plants, Hangzhou Normal University, China. The field site was located at a geographic position of 30°32′18′′ N, 120°40′07′′ E and an altitude of 10 m. The phenotypes of some of the P. angulata materials are shown in Figure 8.
Fresh, young leaf tissues from three individuals of each sample were randomly collected for genomic DNA isolation. Genomic DNA was isolated from these samples as described in our previous studies [1,48]. The DNA quality was evaluated using 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the DNA quantity was determined using a UV spectrophotometer.

4.2. CpSSR Marker Development

In our earlier work, the complete chloroplast genome sequence of P. angulata was sequenced, annotated, and submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database (GenBank accession no. MH045574) [49]. The SSR loci distributed throughout the P. angulata chloroplast genome were screened using MISA software (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/; accessed on 20 May 2022) [50]. The cpSSR motifs comprised 1–6 nucleotides containing the minimum number of repeats. Ten motifs contained mononucleotide repeats, five contained dinucleotide repeats, four contained trinucleotide repeats, and three each contained tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats. Primer Premier 5 software was used to design cpSSR primers, and manual adjustments were made [51]. The parameters for designing the primers were set as follows: the primer length was 18–26 nucleotides, the annealing temperature was 55 °C ± 5 °C, and the amplification product size was 100–300 bp.

4.3. CpSSR Analysis

In total, 54 cpSSR primer pairs were selected and synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Service Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After a trial run of the 54 newly developed cpSSR primer pairs, 30 cpSSRs showing high definition, good stability, and abundant polymorphism were chosen for further analysis. cpSSR amplification was performed in 10 μL volumes including 1 μL of 10× buffer (200 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.8), 100 mM KCl, 100 mM (NH4)2SO4, 20 mM MgCl2, and 1% TritonX-100), 0.8 μL of dNTPs (10 mmol/L), 1 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 1 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (2 U/µL) (Beijing Dingguo Changsheng Biotechnology Co. Ltd., China), 50 ng of genomic DNA template, and 4.7 μL of ddH2O. The amplification program for the cpSSR-PCR was as follows: pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 32 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 50 s, annealing at 55–61 °C (depending on each primer’s Tm value) for 50 s, 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated on 8% nondenaturing-polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide: bisacrylamide 19:1) using Trans2K DNA markers (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) as size standards before being stained with silver.

4.4. Data Analysis

To ensure the accuracy of the results, each pair of primers was used for PCR amplification and electrophoresis detection twice, and only the cpSSR fragments with high definition and good stability were scored. Genetic variation at each locus was characterized in terms of the number of alleles. The PIC was calculated using the following formula: P I C = 1 ( i = 1 n p i 2 ) ( i = 1 n 1 j = i + 1 n 2 q i 2 q j 2 ) , where n is the number of alleles, qi is the frequency of the i-th allele, and qj is the frequency of the j-th allele [52]. The percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL), the number of observed alleles (Na), the number of effective loci (Ne), Shannon’s information diversity index (I), Nei’s genetic diversity index (h), and the total genetic variation of the population (Ht) were calculated using PopGene32 Version 1.32 (https://sites.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/popgene_download.html; accessed on 22 August 2022). The genetic variation within the population (Hs), population genetic differentiation coefficient (Gst), and gene flow (Nm) were also calculated using PopGene32 Version 1.32. On the basis of the genetic consistency of the populations, an unweighted group arithmetic mean (UPGMA) cluster diagram and three-dimensional principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), which enable the visualization of genetic variation distribution across populations, were constructed and carried out using NTSYS-PC 2.10e software [53]. On the basis of the genetic distance among the 203 individuals, a neighbor-joining (NJ) cluster diagram was constructed in MEGA X [54]. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and a two-dimensional principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) across individuals were computed using GenAlEx 6.5 software [55]. The population genetic structure was analyzed using the Bayesian clustering analysis method in STRUCTURE 2.3.4 software [56]. The estimated range of group K values was set to 2–15, and each K value was run 10 times. In addition, the length of burn-in period and MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) parameters were set to 10,000 and 50,000, respectively. Lastly, using Structure Harvester online software (http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester; accessed on 22 August 2022), the results of the structure calculation were analyzed to find the best group K value [57,58].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first study to develop a novel set of cpSSR markers and apply them to the investigation of genetic diversity and genetic structure in P. angulata populations. Our study revealed that most of the newly developed cpSSR markers had a high level of stability and polymorphism. The cpSSR analysis confirmed that P. angulata populations contain considerable genetic diversity, and there are high levels of genetic differentiation among populations. The 16 populations of P. angulata were clustered into four groups with some significant geography-related population structure and extensive admixture. Our study demonstrated that cpSSR markers can be used as a powerful tool for evaluating genetic diversity and population structure in P. angulata.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12091755/s1: Table S1. Information on 57 SSR motifs detected in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata; Table S2. Information on the 54 cpSSR primer pairs developed in this study.

Author Contributions

S.F. and H.W. conceptualized and designed the experiments, participated in the analysis, and drafted the manuscript; K.J., Z.Z., Y.G., Y.J., J.L. and X.Z. carried out the molecular studies; S.F., C.S. and S.Y. performed the statistical analysis; H.W. secured funding and helped to revise the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research funded in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970346, 32000255), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY20H280012). The key project at the central government level for the ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (2060302), and the Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Project Grants (2018C02030).

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) (accessed on 20 October 2022) for editing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feng, S.; Jiang, M.; Shi, Y.; Jiao, K.; Shen, C.; Lu, J.; Ying, Q.; Wang, H. Application of the ribosomal DNA ITS2 region of Physalis (Solanaceae): DNA barcoding and phylogenetic study. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhan, X.; Liao, X.; Luo, X.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, S.; Yu, C.; Lu, J.; Shen, C.; Wang, H. Comparative metabolomic and proteomic analyses reveal the regulation mechanism underlying MeJA-induced bioactive compound accumulation in cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) hairy roots. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6336–6347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ding, H.; Hu, Z.; Yu, L.; Ma, Z.; Ma, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhao, X. Induction of quinone reductase (QR) by withanolides isolated from Physalis angulata L. var. villosa Bonati (Solanaceae). Steroids 2014, 86, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Jin, Y.; Shen, C.; Wang, H.; Feng, S. Complete plastome of Physalis angulata var. villosa, Gene organization, comparative genomics and phylogenetic relationships among Solanaceae. Genes 2022, 13, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, Q.; Shen, C.; Lu, J.; Zhan, X.; Wang, H.; Feng, S. The complete chloroplast genomes of two Physalis species, Physalis macrophysa and P. ixocarpa: Comparative genomics, evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic relationships. Agronomy 2023, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Daltro, S.R.T.; Santos, I.P.; Barros, P.L.; Moreira, D.R.M.; Tomassini, T.C.B.; Ribeiro, I.M.; Ribeiro Dos Santos, R.; Meira, C.S.; Soares, M.B.P. In vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory activity of Physalis angulata concentrated ethanolic extract. Planta. Med. 2021, 87, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, C.P.; Kutateladze, A.G.; Zhao, F.; Chen, L.X.; Qiu, F. A novel withanolide with an unprecedented carbon skeleton from Physalis angulata. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1110–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rivera, D.; Ocampo, Y.; Franco, L.A. Physalis angulata calyces modulate macrophage polarization and alleviate chemically induced intestinal inflammation in mice. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Lu, S.; Wang, L.; Xin, M.; Xu, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, D.; Chen, L.; Liu, S.; Zhao, F. Anti-inflammatory effects of three withanolides isolated from Physalis angulata L. in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells through blocking NF-kappaB signaling pathway. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 276, 114186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramakrishna Pillai, J.; Wali, A.F.; Menezes, G.A.; Rehman, M.U.; Wani, T.A.; Arafah, A.; Zargar, S.; Mir, T.M. Chemical composition analysis, cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Physalis angulata L.: A comparative study of leaves and fruit. Molecules 2022, 27, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Preet, R.; Gupta, R.C. Quantification of withaferin-A and withanolide-A in diploid (n = 12) and tetraploid cytotypes (n = 24) of “Rassbhary”, Physalis angulata L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 33, 3157–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arruda, J.C.C.; Rocha, N.C.; Santos, E.G.; Ferreira, L.G.B.; Bello, M.L.; Penido, C.; Costa, T.; Santos, J.A.A.; Ribeiro, I.M.; Tomassini, T.C.B.; et al. Physalin pool from Physalis angulata L. leaves and physalin D inhibit P2X7 receptor function in vitro and acute lung injury in vivo. Biomed. Pharm. 2021, 142, 112006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Feng, S.; Hou, K.; Zhang, H.; Chen, C.; Huang, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Investigation of the role of TmMYB16/123 and their targets (TmMTP1/11) in the tolerance of Taxus media to cadmium. Tree Physiol. 2023, tpad019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, S.Q. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered species Paeonia decomposita endemic to China and implications for its conservation. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ye, M.R.; Liu, W.; Xue, Q.Y.; Yan, W.J.; Hou, B.W.; Luo, J.; Ding, X.Y. Phylogeography of endangered Dendrobium moniliforme in East Asia based on mitochondrial DNA sequence variations. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017, 26, 1659–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tautz, D. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 1989, 17, 6463–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramu, P.; Billot, C.; Rami, J.F.; Senthilvel, S.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Ananda Reddy, L.; Hash, C.T. Assessment of genetic diversity in the sorghum reference set using EST-SSR markers. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 2051–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, R.; Kumar, C.; Paliwal, R.; Roy Choudhury, D.; Singh, I.; Kumar, A.; Kumari, A.; Singh, R. Development of novel genomic simple sequence repeat (g-SSR) markers and their validation for genetic diversity analyses in Kalmegh [Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Nees]. Plants 2020, 9, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tyagi, S.; Kumar, A.; Gautam, T.; Pandey, R.; Rustgi, S.; Mir, R.R. Development and use of miRNA-derived SSR markers for the study of genetic diversity, population structure, and characterization of genotypes for breeding heat tolerant wheat varieties. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0231063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharma, H.; Hyvonen, J.; Poczai, P. Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Appl. Plant Sci. 2020, 8, e11313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zapiola, M.L.; Cronn, R.C.; Mallory-Smith, C.A. Development of novel chloroplast microsatellite markers to identify species in the Agrostis complex (Poaceae) and related genera. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 738–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiong, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Shu, X.; Yu, Q.; Lei, X.; Li, D.; Yan, J.; Bai, S.; Ma, X. Molecular phylogeography and intraspecific divergences in siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) wild populations in China, Inferred From chloroplast DNA sequence and cpSSR Markers. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 862759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Awasthi, P.; Ahmad, I.; Gandhi, S.G.; Bedi, Y.S. Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for phylogenetic analysis in Brassicaceae. Acta Biol. Hung. 2012, 63, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Phumichai, C.; Phumichai, T.; Wongkaew, A. Novel chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers for genetic diversity assessment of cultivated and wild Hevea Rubber. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1486–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simbaqueba, J.; Sanchez, P.; Sanchez, E.; Nunez Zarantes, V.M.; Chacon, M.I.; Barrero, L.S.; Marino-Ramirez, L. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the Cape gooseberry Physalis peruviana. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vargas-Ponce, O.; Perez-Alvarez, L.F.; Zamora-Tavares, P.; Rodriguez, A. Assessing genetic diversity in Mexican Husk tomato species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 29, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Labate, J.; Robertson, L. Nucleotide diversity estimates of tomatillo (Physalis philadelphica) accessions including nine new inbred lines. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garzon-Martinez, G.A.; Osorio-Guarin, J.A.; Delgadillo-Duran, P.; Mayorga, F.; Enciso-Rodriguez, F.E.; Landsman, D.; Marino-Ramirez, L.; Barrero, L.S. Genetic diversity and population structure in Physalis peruviana and related taxa based on InDels and SNPs derived from COSII and IRG markers. Plant Gene 2015, 4, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, L.S.; Sun, Y.Q.; Jin, Y.; Gao, Q.; Hu, X.G.; Gao, F.L.; Yang, X.L.; Zhu, J.J.; El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Mao, J.F. Development of high transferability cpSSR markers for individual identification and genetic investigation in Cupressaceae species. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 4967–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Terrab, A.; Paun, O.; Talavera, S.; Tremetsberger, K.; Arista, M.; Stuessy, T.F. Genetic diversity and population structure in natural populations of Moroccan Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica; Pinaceae) determined with cpSSR markers. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1274–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, S.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Wu, H. Comparative analysis of four Zantedeschia chloroplast genomes: Expansion and contraction of the IR region, phylogenetic analyses and SSR genetic diversity assessment. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Shen, S.K. Genetic diversity and population structure of Rhododendron rex subsp. rex inferred from microsatellite markers and chloroplast DNA sequences. Plants 2020, 9, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ye, J.W.; Li, D.Z. Development of 20 chloroplast microsatellite primers in wuyao (Lindera aggregata, Lauraceae). Appl. Plant Sci. 2019, 7, e01213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, M.; Xu, L.A.; Cao, F.L.; Zhang, H.J.; Yu, F.X. Development of novel chloroplast microsatellite markers for Ginkgo biloba. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 7715–7720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xue, J.; Wang, S.; Zhou, S.L. Polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite loci in Nelumbo (Nelumbonaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, e240–e244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Feng, S.; He, R.; Lu, J.; Jiang, M.; Shen, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H. Development of SSR markers and assessment of genetic diversity in medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bhandawat, A.; Sharma, V.; Singh, P.; Seth, R.; Nag, A.; Kaur, J.; Sharma, R.K. Discovery and utilization of EST-SSR marker resource for genetic diversity and population structure analyses of a subtropical bamboo, Dendrocalamus hamiltonii. Biochem Genet. 2019, 57, 652–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, N.; Wang, P.Y.; Liu, X.D.; Shen, H.L. Use of EST-SSR markers for evaluating genetic diversity and fingerprinting celery (Apium graveolens L.) cultivars. Molecules 2014, 19, 1939–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, X.; Chen, W.; Luo, J.; Yao, Z.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Shen, Y. Development of EST-SSR markers and their application in an analysis of the genetic diversity of the endangered species Magnolia sinostellata. Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG 2019, 294, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hamrick, J.L.; Godt, M.J.W.; Sherman-Broyles, S.L. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For. 1992, 6, 95–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zamora-Tavares, P.; Vargas-Ponce, O.; Sanchez-Martinez, J.; Cabrera-Toledo, D. Diversity and genetic structure of the husk tomato (Physalis philadelphica Lam.) in Western Mexico. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2015, 62, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wei, J.; Hu, X.; Yang, J.; Yang, W. Identification of single-copy orthologous genes between Physalis and Solanum lycopersicum and analysis of genetic diversity in Physalis using molecular markers. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yao, X.; Ye, Q.; Kang, M.; Huang, H. Microsatellite analysis reveals interpopulation differentiation and gene flow in the endangered tree Changiostyrax dolichocarpa (Styracaceae) with fragmented distribution in central China. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Xu, L.; Feng, J.; Wang, J.; Tang, Y.; Pei, X.; Zhao, X. Genetic diversity of Juglans mandshurica populations in northeast China based on SSR markers. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 931578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, W.; Bai, Z.; Wang, F.; Zou, M.; Wang, X.; Xie, J.; Zhang, F. Analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure of Monochasma savatieri Franch. ex Maxim using novel EST-SSR markers. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xia, T.; Chen, S.; Chen, S.; Ge, X. Genetic variation within and among populations of Rhodiola alsia (Crassulaceae) native to the Tibetan Plateau as detected by ISSR markers. Biochem. Genet. 2005, 43, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barkley, N.A.; Roose, M.L.; Krueger, R.R.; Federici, C.T. Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Feng, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, C.; Jiao, K.; Jiang, M.; Lu, J.; Shen, C.; Ying, Q.; Wang, H. Development of species-specific SCAR markers, based on a SCoT analysis, to authenticate Physalis (Solanaceae) species. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, S.; Zheng, K.; Jiao, K.; Cai, Y.; Chen, C.; Mao, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhan, X.; Ying, Q.; Wang, H. Complete chloroplast genomes of four Physalis species (Solanaceae): Lights into genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Beier, S.; Thiel, T.; Munch, T.; Scholz, U.; Mascher, M. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2583–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lalitha, S. Primer premier 5. Biotech Softw. Internet Rep. Comput. Softw. J. Sci. 2000, 1, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Botstein, D.; White, R.L.; Skolnick, M.; Davis, R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980, 32, 314–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Rohlf, F.J. NTSYS-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.00. In Biochemical Genetics; Exeter Software: Setauket, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Falush, D.; Stephens, M.; Pritchard, J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Earl, D.A.; Vonholdt, B.M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Types of SSR motifs detected in the P. angulata chloroplast genome.
Figure 1. Types of SSR motifs detected in the P. angulata chloroplast genome.
Plants 12 01755 g001
Figure 2. Dendrogram of 16 populations of P. angulata based on UPGMA analysis.
Figure 2. Dendrogram of 16 populations of P. angulata based on UPGMA analysis.
Plants 12 01755 g002
Figure 3. Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of 203 individuals from 16 P. angulata populations. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Figure 3. Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of 203 individuals from 16 P. angulata populations. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Plants 12 01755 g003
Figure 4. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 203 individuals of P. angulata based on GenAlEx analysis. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Figure 4. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 203 individuals of P. angulata based on GenAlEx analysis. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Plants 12 01755 g004
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 16 populations of P. angulata based on NTSYS analysis. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 16 populations of P. angulata based on NTSYS analysis. All tested samples were grouped into four clusters: I, II, III and IV.
Plants 12 01755 g005
Figure 6. Population genetic structure. (A) Estimation of the best subpopulation numbers using delta K values for K ranging from 2 to 15. (B) Genetic structural plot of 16 P. angulata populations based on structure analysis. (b-1) K = 4, sorted by Q via STRUCTURE. (b-2) K = 4, samples displayed in order of P. angulata populations.
Figure 6. Population genetic structure. (A) Estimation of the best subpopulation numbers using delta K values for K ranging from 2 to 15. (B) Genetic structural plot of 16 P. angulata populations based on structure analysis. (b-1) K = 4, sorted by Q via STRUCTURE. (b-2) K = 4, samples displayed in order of P. angulata populations.
Plants 12 01755 g006
Figure 7. Sampling locations of the P. angulata used in this study.
Figure 7. Sampling locations of the P. angulata used in this study.
Plants 12 01755 g007
Figure 8. Partial germplasm resource sample phenotype and P. angulata planting resource nursery. (A) sample from XJ; (B) sample from JJ; (C) sample from HZ; (D) sample from XS; (E) sample from NH; (F) sample from WZ; (G,H) P. angulata planting resource nursery.
Figure 8. Partial germplasm resource sample phenotype and P. angulata planting resource nursery. (A) sample from XJ; (B) sample from JJ; (C) sample from HZ; (D) sample from XS; (E) sample from NH; (F) sample from WZ; (G,H) P. angulata planting resource nursery.
Plants 12 01755 g008
Table 1. Characterization of cpSSRs in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata.
Table 1. Characterization of cpSSRs in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata.
ParameterValue
Total size of examined sequences (bp)156,905
Total number of identified SSRs57
Number of SSR containing sequences1
Number of sequences containing more than 1 SSR1
Number of SSRs present in compound formation3
Repeat types
Mononucleotide39 (68.42%)
Dinucleotide6 (10.53%)
Trinucleotide5 (8.77%)
Tetranucleotide7 (12.28%)
Table 2. Distributions of cpSSR motifs observed in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata.
Table 2. Distributions of cpSSR motifs observed in the chloroplast genome of P. angulata.
SSR MotifNumber of Repeat Units in cp Genome
Repeats3456789≥10Total
Mononucleotide 3939
(A)n1414
(C)n11
(T)n2424
Dinucleotide 5 1 6
(AT)n3 3
(TA)n2 13
Trinucleotide 5 5
(AAG)n11
(ACT)n11
(TAA)n11
(TTA)n11
(TTC)n11
Tetranucleotide7 7
(AAAC)n11
(CTAT)n11
(CTTA)n11
(TTTA)n22
(TTTG)n22
Total75501003957
Distribution frequency (%)12.288.778.7701.540068.42
Table 3. Statistical analyses of genetic polymorphisms in 30 cpSSR primer pairs.
Table 3. Statistical analyses of genetic polymorphisms in 30 cpSSR primer pairs.
Primer NamePrimer Sequences (5′–3′)Repeat MotifTm (°C)Sequence Size (bp)No. of AllelesPolymorphic AllelesPolymorphic Rate (%)PIC
KzcpSSR02F: CGTAGAAAGACGAAAGTGGATT(AAG)458196111090.910.931
R: AAACTCTTCGCTATTGGGTAAA
KzcpSSR04F: ATAGATAAATACACCAAACAACAAA(T)1258231121191.670.945
R: GATAGAAGTTAATCAGTAATGGGAA
KzcpSSR17F: TCAACAATGATCCACTAGACACT(A)205825599100.000.939
R: TTTTCCCCTCAAATATGAATACT
KzcpSSR18F: AGGTTCTTTAAATTCCGTGG(TTC)4581724375.000.835
R: TCCTTTTTCAAATCCTGCTG
KzcpSSR19F: TGATCGTGACCTTGAACCTGTT(T)13602992150.000.550
R: TCCCTCTCTCTCCTTTTTTGCT
KzcpSSR21F: TTTTTCCTATTTTGACTTCTATG(T)13561722150.000.657
R: ATCTGTCATTACGTGCGACTATC
KzcpSSR23F: ACAAGGAATGAAAAGAAAAAAGA(CTTA)3562314125.000.781
R: AATAATAGATAGTAAATGGGTCG
KzcpSSR24F: GGGATGAATTGGATAAATATACAG(TA)5581584375.000.831
R: TAGATGATTGATAATGTTCCTTTG
KzcpSSR25F: GAATAAAAAAAAGAATAGGGAA(ACT)4562472150.000.613
R: TAGAATTGTGATAAATCGAAA
KzcpSSR26F: TTCTCCTGTTTCTCTTGTTTTTTT(T)115718988100.000.922
R: CTCTTCTATTTGATTACTTGTTCT
KzcpSSR29F: CTTTGCGTTTTTCTTTCTTTT(A)11571787571.430.897
R: ACCCAATTTTTATTTTTTACC
KzcpSSR30F: GAGTTTTTGACTTTCATTATTTTG(T)105818844100.000.862
R: TTTTCTTCCCCGCATTTATC
KzcpSSR31F: AAAAGAAAAAGAAATCCATTTT(A)10…(TTTG)3571764125.000.780
R: GTTGGGTTCATCCCTGTAGTAA
KzcpSSR34F: CTCTACAAGAAAATTGACCCCC(A)13581876583.330.865
R: TGCTGAATCACAGACAAAAAAA
KzcpSSR35F: GATAAAGTCGGTTGATTAGGGT(T)16601788787.500.921
R: ATTGAAAAATCGAAGAAAAGCC
KzcpSSR36F: CCCATTACCATTTCTTTTTGT(T)106017944100.000.858
R: TGAAGTATCCAGGCTCCGTTT
KzcpSSR37F: TTTGTTTTGTAATGGATAGTTGC(T)125625122100.000.714
R: TTTTTGTTATTGGGATAGGTGAA
KzcpSSR38F: TCTTTGTTTTGTAATGGATAGTTG(AT)56025622100.000.719
R: GTTTTTTTGTTATTGGGATAGGTG
KzcpSSR39F: TTGGCTGTTATTCAAAAGGTC(T)11581885360.000.836
R: ACAATCAACATACGGTTCCTT
KzcpSSR41F: TTCTTATTTAATGGTTAGGTCCG(T)106017544100.000.854
R: AAAGCATCAATACGCATTCATAC
KzcpSSR42F: ATTGTGGGTATAATGGTAGATGC(T)16582717685.710.896
R: TGGAAGAAGAAGTAGAAAAAGGA
KzcpSSR44F: AAAATGGAAAGTTCGACACAA(A)12581433266.670.772
R: GAAGAGAAGCAAATGAAAGGC
KzcpSSR45F: GTGACGATACTGTAGGGGAGG(A)12582397571.430.904
R: ATTTCGGGTTAAGAAGATGTG
KzcpSSR46F: AGGTCGTGTCATCTTTCTTCCAT(A)10601535480.000.850
R: CACAAAACCCCTTTCTACTCAAT
KzcpSSR47F: GGAAAGAAACAAAAAAAAGAAA(A)115812544100.000.857
R: TGAGAAAGGAGAATAGGAATGA
KzcpSSR48F: CAATTTTCAGATTCAGTTTGACTA(T)135919955100.000.885
R: AAGAAACCAAAGAATGGCTTATCA
KzcpSSR49F: GCCATTCTTTGGTTTCTTTT(T)105616044100.000.861
R: TCCTTTTTTGAGCCCATTTT
KzcpSSR50F: ATCAATGAAGGTAATAGAATA(T)105517966100.000.903
R: CAAACAAAAAGAGAAGAGAAA
KzcpSSR51F: CGAGGTGTGAAGTGGGAGAGA(T)126014599100.000.935
R: CGACGCCAGGATGATAAAAAG
KzcpSSR53F: GTAATTTCATAGAGTCATTCGGTC(AT)56023622100.000.716
R: CCAAACTGTACAAGCTTCTTCCAA
Average 5.24.481.290.830
Total 156132
Table 4. Genetic diversity analysis of 16 populations of P. angulata.
Table 4. Genetic diversity analysis of 16 populations of P. angulata.
PopulationNaNehIPLPPL (%)
HZ1.1154 ± 0.32051.0879 ± 0.26230.0476 ± 0.13890.0685 ± 0.19721811.54
XS1.5449 ± 0.49961.2984 ± 0.37050.1743 ± 0.19740.2640 ± 0.27988554.49
LA1.2051 ± 0.40511.0873 ± 0.22680.0536 ± 0.12950.0839 ± 0.19093220.51
DQ1.0641 ± 0.24571.0371 ± 0.16630.0215 ± 0.09020.0325 ± 0.1316106.41
YW1.3077 ± 0.46301.1848 ± 0.31220.1093 ± 0.17920.1628 ± 0.26094830.77
PJ1.4551 ± 0.49961.2226 ± 0.33250.1324 ± 0.18500.2020 ± 0.26607145.51
NH1.1795 ± 0.38501.1368 ± 0.31200.0749 ± 0.16720.1079 ± 0.23812817.95
LH1.1538 ± 0.36201.0969 ± 0.25760.0555 ± 0.14180.0821 ± 0.20482415.38
TZ1.2244 ± 0.41851.1689 ± 0.32550.0951 ± 0.17960.1376 ± 0.25843522.44
WZ1.5000 ± 0.50161.2375 ± 0.33270.1428 ± 0.18520.2195 ± 0.26567850.00
NJZ1.3205 ± 0.46821.1466 ± 0.27300.0902 ± 0.16000.1390 ± 0.23515032.05
NJX1.1346 ± 0.34241.0842 ± 0.23210.0498 ± 0.13210.0741 ± 0.19382113.46
JJ1.3910 ± 0.48961.2323 ± 0.36550.1323 ± 0.19230.1982 ± 0.27396139.10
HG1.4231 ± 0.49561.2306 ± 0.34580.1344 ± 0.19090.2019 ± 0.27386642.31
XJ1.4936 ± 0.50161.2692 ± 0.36720.1559 ± 0.19750.2345 ± 0.28097749.36
YN1.5449 ± 0.49961.2858 ± 0.36340.1673 ± 0.19740.2529 ± 0.28088554.49
Average1.3161 ± 0.43111.1754 ± 0.30280.1023 ± 0.16650.1538 ± 0.23954931.61
Table 5. Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal).
Table 5. Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal).
PopulationHZXSLADQYWPJNHLHTZWZNJZNJXJJHGXJYN
HZ 0.50090.92210.89960.92380.53390.44460.92370.89930.52930.48600.88450.84380.88920.90150.8935
XS0.6914 0.52670.49940.53560.92110.91710.50460.52660.90750.90930.51600.64820.59200.59750.5809
LA0.08110.6411 0.94190.94790.55700.46620.95070.94260.51430.48970.90540.85380.89980.90530.9119
DQ0.10590.69430.0599 0.96120.51990.44030.91460.91970.48580.44090.89300.82540.88810.87400.8716
YW0.07930.62430.05350.0396 0.54930.47270.93920.93460.52370.48520.91500.85050.91830.91150.9124
PJ0.62750.08220.58530.65410.5991 0.93370.53700.54330.90800.91060.51010.67740.59330.61540.5939
NH0.81060.08650.76310.82020.74920.0686 0.46030.46580.89000.91710.43740.58350.51750.53620.5092
LH0.07940.68400.05050.08930.06270.62170.7758 0.96770.50380.48330.92630.85490.91790.93020.9204
TZ0.10620.64140.05910.08370.06770.61000.76400.0329 0.54430.49700.91670.86080.92280.92170.9194
WZ0.63610.09710.66490.72200.64690.09660.11650.68560.6083 0.93460.50650.66570.60340.60980.5979
NJZ0.72160.09510.71390.81900.72320.09370.08650.72710.69910.0676 0.48960.64620.57940.59640.5650
NJX0.12270.66170.09940.11310.08880.67310.82680.07650.08700.68020.7141 0.84920.93740.94130.9336
JJ0.16980.43350.15810.19190.16190.38960.53880.15670.14990.40700.43660.1634 0.90120.90210.8985
HG0.11740.52430.10560.11870.08520.52210.65870.08570.08040.50510.54570.06470.1041 0.95340.9551
XJ0.10370.51500.09950.13470.09270.48550.62330.07230.08150.49470.51680.06040.10310.0477 0.9513
YN0.11260.54320.09220.13750.09170.52100.67500.08290.08410.51430.57100.06870.10710.04600.0499
Table 6. Genetic variation in the 16 populations of P. angulata based on cpSSR markers.
Table 6. Genetic variation in the 16 populations of P. angulata based on cpSSR markers.
Total Gene Diversity (Ht)Population Genetic Diversity
(Hs)
Coefficient of Genetic Differentiation (Gst)Gene Flow (Nm)
0.3224 ± 0.02840.1023 ± 0.00640.68270.2324
Table 7. Summary of the AMOVA results for 203 samples of P. angulata.
Table 7. Summary of the AMOVA results for 203 samples of P. angulata.
SourcedfSSMSEst. Var.Percentage (%)PhiPT
Among pops1510,086.383672.42651.470710.710 (p = 0.001)
Within pops1873923.82420.98320.98329
Total20214,010.207 72.453100
Note: df, degree of freedom; SS, sum of squared observations; MS, mean of squared observations. PhiPT = AP/(WP + AP) = AP/TOT; Key: AP = estimated variance among populations, WP = estimated variance within populations.
Table 8. Sample sizes and location information for 16 populations of P. angulata.
Table 8. Sample sizes and location information for 16 populations of P. angulata.
NumberPopulation CodeSample SizeLocations
1HZ10Jianggan, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2XS14Xiaoshan, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
3LA13Tianmushan, Lin’an, Zhejiang, China
4DQ6Deqing, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
5YW12Yiwu, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
6PJ14Pujiang, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
7NH10Nihai, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
8LH12Linhai, Taizhou, Zhejinag, China
9TZ15Jiaojiang, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
10WZ12Wenling, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
11NJZ15Xixia, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
12NJX12Xuanwu, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
13JJ13Xunyang, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China
14HG15Luotian, Huanggang, Hubei, China
15XJ14Xiajin, Dezhou, Shangdong, China
16YN16Baohua, Honghe, Yunnan, China
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, S.; Jiao, K.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, S.; Gao, Y.; Jin, Y.; Shen, C.; Lu, J.; Zhan, X.; Wang, H. Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) in China. Plants 2023, 12, 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091755

AMA Style

Feng S, Jiao K, Zhang Z, Yang S, Gao Y, Jin Y, Shen C, Lu J, Zhan X, Wang H. Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) in China. Plants. 2023; 12(9):1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091755

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Shangguo, Kaili Jiao, Zhenhao Zhang, Sai Yang, Yadi Gao, Yanyun Jin, Chenjia Shen, Jiangjie Lu, Xiaori Zhan, and Huizhong Wang. 2023. "Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata L.) in China" Plants 12, no. 9: 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091755

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop